Some of the Day’s that pay-outs were agreed
27 January 2015 10:05
30 January 2015 17:02
This one is on us / or something like that!
1)
A Simulation of
January 2012
2)
A Simulation of
February 2012
8)
A Simulation of
August 2012
9)
A Simulation of
September 2012
10)
A Simulation of
October 2012
11)
A Simulation of
November 2012
12)
A Simulation of
December 2012
1)
A Simulation of January 2013
2)
A Simulation of February 2013
8)
A Simulation of August 2013
9)
A Simulation of September 2013
10) A Simulation of
October 2013
11) A Simulation of
November 2013
12) A Simulation of
December 2013
1)
A Simulation of January 2014
2)
A Simulation of February 2014
8)
A Simulation of August 2014
9)
A Simulation of September 2014
10) A Simulation of
October 2014
11) A Simulation of
November 2014
12) A Simulation of
December 2014
1)
A Simulation of January 2015
2)
A Simulation of February 2015
8)
A Simulation of August 2015
9)
A Simulation of September 2015
10) A Simulation of
October 2015
11) A Simulation of
November 2015
12) A Simulation of
December 2015
1)
A Simulation of January 2016
2)
A Simulation of February 2016
8)
A Simulation of August 2016
9)
A Simulation of September 2016
10) A Simulation of
October 2016
11) A Simulation of
November 2016
12) A Simulation of
December 2016
1)
A Simulation of January 2017
2)
A Simulation of February 2017
8)
A Simulation of August 2017
9)
A Simulation of September 2017
10) A Simulation of
October 2017
11) A Simulation of
November 2017
12) A Simulation of
December 2017
1) A Simulation of
January 2018
A Simulation of September 2018
A Simulation of September 2019
A Simulation of September 2020
A Simulation of September 2021
A Simulation of September 2022
Driving Ban
Simulation
Simulation January 2012
(Click
here to go back to the Index)
Simulation
February 2012 (Click here to go back to
the Index)
Simulation
March 2012 (Click
here to go back to the Index)
|
March 2012 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
23/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
24/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
25/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
26/03/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
27/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
27/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
28/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
29/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
30/03/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
31/03/2012 |
|
|
Simulation
April 2012 (Click
here to go back to the Index)
|
April 2012 |
||||
|
Incidents |
||||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
01/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance
Company Limited. I am the named
policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid
policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was
valid until 22/02/2013 |
02/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance
Company Limited. I am the named
policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid
policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was
valid until 22/02/2013 |
03/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
04/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
05/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
06/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
07/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance
Company Limited. I am the named
policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid
policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was
valid until 22/02/2013 |
08/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
09/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
10/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
11/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
12/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
13/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
14/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
15/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
16/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
17/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
18/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
19/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
20/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
21/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
22/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
23/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
24/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: Insurance “Certificate
of insurance” / Page Numbers: 1 |
25/04/2012 |
|
|
|
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: Insurance “Certificate of insurance” / Page
Numbers: 1 Date: Wednesday, 25 April 2012, 13:06 Subject: Certificate of insurance From: Jamie Close JamieClose@broadsuredirect.com Good Afternoon, please find
attached your Insurance documentation for your Motor trade Policy, your
certificate of insurance is included in the documentation. Many Thanks, Jamie
Close. Si Note: This is a copy of the email
that I got sent out that contains proof of my Certificate
of insurance. |
||||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
26/04/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
27/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
28/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
29/04/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
30/04/2012 |
|
|
Simulation
May 2012 (Click
here to go back to the Index)
Simulation
June 2012 (Click here to go back to
the Index)
|
June 2012 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
01/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
02/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
03/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
04/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
05/06/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
06/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
07/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
08/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
09/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
10/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
11/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
12/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
13/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
14/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
15/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
16/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
17/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
18/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
19/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
20/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
21/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
22/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
23/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
23/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
24/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
25/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
26/06/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
27/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
27/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
28/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
29/06/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
30/06/2012 |
|
|
Simulation July 2012 (Click here to go back to
the Index)
|
July 2012 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
01/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
02/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
03/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
04/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
05/07/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
06/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
07/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
08/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
09/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
10/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
11/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
12/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
13/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
14/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
15/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
16/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
17/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
18/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
19/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
20/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
21/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 1
Stopped by Police. Driving Ban
(1) Page Numbers: 2
Driving Ban! Life could make you cry, yet again. Page Numbers: |
22/07/2012 |
|
|
|
“Driving Ban
(1)” 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: Stopped by Police. Page Numbers: 22/07/2012 Ø
I was yet again
harassed. Ø
My vehicle showed up
in error on the police Database stating I did not have any insurance to
drive. Ø
but I really did
have the correct insurance policy in place at the time. Ø
Police later created
a case out of the on goings of the incident and took the case to court. Ø
this got said to get
done by government officials via a summons. Ø
what I did not
receive. Email Dated = 06/05/2013 Ø
The offence of no
insurance was allegedly committed on 22/07/2012 Ø
I had a valid policy
of insurance from 23/03/2012 Ø
and this policy was
valid until 22/02/2013 Ø
The company insuring
me was Tradex Insurance Company Limited. Ø
I am the named
policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. “Driving Ban
(1)” 2 Stopped by Police Diary. Life could make you cry, yet again. Page Numbers: Stopped by Police. Ø Life could make you cry, yet again, I am
telling the truth the police kept pulling me over: -- Ø In this point of my life, I managed
to still stay happy and in my thoughts; I was as innocent as a true;
“Jubilant British Child.” Ø When describing my first arrival at
Burncroft Avenue, I would say Life to me was pretty average to myself
and others, in this time period the police had been pulling me over
where-ever on a regular basis, but what was going on seemed to still be
manageable. Ø When I got home, I reminisced on the bad
incident, what did take place while I went out. Ø I can visualize and now document down
what happened to me: I got stopped by the police on the 22/07/2012. Ø I was yet again harassed. Ø My vehicle showed up in error on the
police Database stating I did not have any insurance to drive, but I
really did have the correct insurance policy in place at the time. Ø Police later created a case out of the on
goings of the incident and took the case to court, this got said to get done
by government officials via a summons, what I did not receive. Ø In applying to have the case reopened, I
did get justice and as a further, consequence to this meant I won the case
and this became apparent a few months after the problem aroused, but even so,
this was not until I noticed this case existed; In the final stages of this
case I did finally managed to sort the issues out in the police’s ongoing case,
against me, by showing my insurance policy to the judge at the courthouse, so
in this instance, towards my person I was adjacent to, a fine and points that
did take place against my person, in turn causing me to suffer and this
incident caused me wrongful punishments of expense, out of my life, to partly
explain some of my expenses this incident got placed as an offence onto
my driving licence, in an effect; causing a driving ban to persist. Ø I latter did have the conviction removed,
and the inducements redacted from my driving licence, but this case also
caused me other additional wrongful losses out of my life. |
||||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
23/07/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
24/07/2012 |
|
||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
25/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
26/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
27/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
28/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
29/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
30/07/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
31/07/2012 |
|
|
Simulation August 2012 (Click here to go back to
the Index)
|
August 2012 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013
·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Insurance Broad Sure / Page Numbers: 5,6 |
01/08/2012 |
|
|
|
Error: I am not sure were it
goes for now! The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 01 Insurance
Broad Sure / Page Numbers: 5,6 Date: Wednesday, 1 August 2012, 14:14: Subject: REF: Documents: -- From: Gaheris Edwards (gaheris@broadsuredirect.com) To: re_wired@ymail.com; Kind Regards, Gaheris Edwards Insurance
Administration Department. Attachments S Cordell Docs.GE.pdf (44.74 KB) 6 S Cordell.GE.pdf (182.78 KB) image001.png (6.81 KB) Si Note: This Email with the policy proves that I was
insured on the following dates that were in question by the met police
alongside with these listed emails, dated: -- |
||||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
02/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
03/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
04/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
05/08/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
06/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
07/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
08/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
09/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
10/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
11/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
12/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
13/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
14/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
15/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
16/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
17/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
18/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
19/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
20/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
21/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
22/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
23/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
24/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
25/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
26/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
27/08/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
28/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
29/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
30/08/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
31/08/2012 |
|
|
Simulation September 2012 (Click
here to go back to the Index)
|
September 2012 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
01/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
02/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
03/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
04/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
05/09/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
06/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
07/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
08/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
09/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
10/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
11/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
12/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
13/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
14/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
15/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
16/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
17/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
18/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
19/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
20/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
21/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
22/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
23/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
24/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
25/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
26/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
27/09/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
28/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
29/09/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
30/09/2012 |
|
|
Simulation October 2012 (Click here to go back to
the Index)
|
October 2012 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
01/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
02/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
03/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
04/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
05/10/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
06/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
07/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
08/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
09/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
10/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
11/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
12/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
13/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
14/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
15/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
16/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
17/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
18/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
19/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
20/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
21/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
22/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
23/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
24/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
25/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
26/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
27/10/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
28/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
29/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
30/10/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
31/10/2012 |
|
|
Simulation November 2012 (Click
here to go back to the Index)
|
November 2012 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
01/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
02/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
03/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
04/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
05/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
06/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
07/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
08/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
09/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
10/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
11/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
12/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
13/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
14/11/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
15/11/2012 |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
16/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
17/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
18/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
19/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
20/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
21/11/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
22/11/2012 |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
23/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
24/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
25/11/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
26/11/2012 |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
27/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
28/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
29/11/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
30/11/2012 |
|
|
Simulation December 2012 (Click
here to go back to the Index)
|
December 2012 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 2012 December 2012 Mothers Car got
crashed (Ford fiesta) |
01/12/2012 |
|
|
|
2012 December 2012 Ø Mothers Car got crashed (Ford fiesta) Ø Tradex Insurance Policy Ø This is when the blokes slammed their breaks on me coming down the sloop
onto the A406 in the rain, this was one of those insurance scams that got
done to me. |
||||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
02/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and
my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
03/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
04/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
05/12/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
06/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
07/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
08/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
09/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
10/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
11/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
12/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
13/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
14/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
15/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
16/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
17/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
18/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
19/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
20/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 Driving ban (1)? Si Note: 1 21/12/2012 Added from 09 January 2013
13:16 From:
Lorraine Cordell Mail
To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent:
21 December 2012 16:47 To: 'glthames.mclist@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk' Subject:
RE: Simon Cordell Court case |
21/12/2012 |
|
|
|
Driving ban (1)? Si Note: 1 Added
from 09 January 2013 13:16 From:
Lorraine Cordell Mail
To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent:
21 December 2012 16:47 To: 'glthames.mclist@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk' Subject:
RE: Simon Cordell Court case To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email after a call
I made to the court about a case that was heard about no insurance which the
outcome was 6 points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. My Name and address are below Mr Simon Cordell 23 Byron terraces Edmonton London N9 7DG Ø The problem I have with this is yes, I was pulled up by the
police and was asked to bring my insurance to a police station which I did
do, but it seem the police had given me the wrong form so the police station
would not accept me to give them my insurance documents and said it would
need to go to court. Ø I have never heard anything about this until I got a
letter from DVLA saying I had to send my driving licence back to them. Ø I called DVLA to be told that there was a court case
which was heard and that I been given 6 points so needed to send my driving
licence to them to get these points added. Ø I explained to them that I did not know about any court
date and that I did in fact have insurance to drive on the day the police
pulled me over. Ø DVLA give me the court information to contract the court
which I did and was told I need to put in that I did not know about the court
date. Ø I called Enfield court and was told that I need to write
a letter to them which I have done but as of today’s date 21/12/2012 Ø I have not heard anything back from them. Ø Today 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA saying that my driving licence was
going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 again, I made a call to them which they have put a next
28 days onto the date that they will revoke my driving licence, I have also made a next call to the court and it seems
I was given the wrong information and it should have asked for the case to be
reopened which I am doing now by send you this email. Ø Please could you reopen the case so that I can indeed
show the court I do in fact have insurance to have been driving on the date I
was pulled by the police, and as I said on the phone to the court person, I
speak to today I did not know about any dates for court before I got the
letter from DVLA. Ø I will enclose in this email my insurance documents so
you can see in fact I was insurance, and could you please send me a new date
to go to court to prove this. Many Thanks |
||||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
22/12/2012 |
|
|
|
21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
||||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
23/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
24/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
25/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
26/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
27/12/2012 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
28/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
29/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
30/12/2012 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell,
and my policy number is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
31/12/2012 |
|
|
Simulation January 2013 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
Driving Case Files / Attachments 27/02/2013 Till 20/10/2015 |
||||
|
|
|
INTRO Start! |
|
|
|
January 2013 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. 1 I grow up a bit
more – The start with the
police for me! Month Summary! |
01/01/2013 |
|
|
|
1 I grow up a bit
more – The start with the
police for me! Month Summary! Ø The month the start of more Evidence of a
continuation off assault against my person that still to date, continues to
persist: - In 2013 at the start, be that as it may, I am still
fighting strong for my share of a fair reality, that to me would make me my
perfect life, but this has taken a drastic turn, for the worst. Ø My Life has definitely changed for me by
now and in being granted the quoted and as a further continuation of events,
I have noticed that no matter how much I induce myself into good things that
I commit my time to, that I always seem to get into some form of speculated:
-- “accused trouble.” Ø I and some other people believe that
these happenings occur until now, with the police for my, jubilant, denial of
not having a deprived lifestyle and also for getting to this age in my life I
partly believe that the police just simply will not leave me alone as they
want me in prison or dead full stop and this is, because of their running
companies'' running objectives: -- to me this means that this is because of
how misplaced the police force get portrayed by some officers, at different
times. |
||||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
02/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
03/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
04/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
05/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
06/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
07/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
08/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. 1 Driving Ban (1)? The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 2 Lorraine Cordell RE_ Simon
Cordell Court case _ (2) / Page Numbers: 19,20 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 3 Lorraine Cordell RE_ Simon
Cordell Court case _ (3) / Page
Numbers: 21,22 “Same as above” |
09/01/2013 |
|
|
|
1 Driving Ban (1)? The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 2 Lorraine Cordell RE_ Simon
Cordell Court case _ (2) / Page Numbers: 19,20 From:
Lorraine
Cordell Sent:
09
January 2013 13:16 To: 'glthames.mclist@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk' Subject:
RE: RE: Simon
Cordell Court case To Whom It May Concern: Ø I sent an email on the 21/12/2012 about a
case below, I have not heard anything about this email. Ø Please can you confirm you have got the email with a
reply to this email so that I know this matter is being looked into. Many Thanks Mr Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 December 2012 16:47 To: 'glthames.mclist@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Court case To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email after a call I made to the court about a case
that was heard about no insurance which the outcome was 6 points on my
driving licence and a £700 fine. My Name and address are below Mr Simon Cordell 23 Byron terraces Edmonton London N9 7DG Ø
The problem I have with this is
yes, I was pulled up by the police and was asked to bring my insurance to a
police station which I did do, but it seem the police had given me the wrong
form so the police station would not accept me to give them my insurance
documents and said it would need to go to court. Ø
I have never heard anything
about this until I got a letter from DVLA saying I had to send my driving
licence back to them. Ø
I called DVLA to be told that
there was a court case which was heard and that I been given 6 points so
needed to send my driving licence to them to get these points added. Ø
I explained to them that I did
not know about any court date and that I did in fact have insurance to drive
on the day the police pulled me over. Ø
DVLA give me the court
information to contract the court which I did and was told I need to put in
that I did not know about the court date. Ø
I called Enfield court and was
told that I need to write a letter to them which I have done but as of
today’s date 21/12/2012 Ø
I have not heard anything back
from them. Ø
Today 21/12/2012 I got a
next letter from DVLA saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked
on the 22/12/2012 again, I
made a call to them which they have put a next 28 days onto the date that
they will revoke my driving licence, I have also made a
next call to the court and it seems I was given the wrong information and it
should have asked for the case to be reopened which I am doing now by send
you this email. Ø
Please could you reopen the
case so that I can indeed show the court I do in fact have insurance to have
been driving on the date I was pulled by the police, and as I said on the
phone to the court person, I speak to today I did not know about any dates
for court before I got the letter from DVLA. Ø
I will enclose in this email my
insurance documents so you can see in fact I was insurance, and could you
please send me a new date to go to court to prove this. Many Thanks |
||||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
10/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
11/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
12/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
13/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
14/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
15/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
16/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
17/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
18/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
19/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
20/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
21/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from DVLA
saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 revoked
date + 22/01/2013 extension
date till = 6
points on my driving licence and a £700 fine. |
22/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
23/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
24/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
25/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
26/01/2013 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
27/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
27/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
28/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
29/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
30/01/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
31/01/2013 |
|
|
Simulation February 2013 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
February 2013 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
01/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
02/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
03/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
04/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
05/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
06/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
07/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
08/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
09/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
10/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
11/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
12/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
13/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
14/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
15/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
16/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
17/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
18/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
19/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
20/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
21/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell, and my policy number
is L/WST/MTP/0192359. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013 |
22/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. 08/04/2012 insurance policy
email "insurance broker Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" +
"Lloyds Bank" = MT3574694 I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
23/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
24/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
25/02/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
26/02/2013 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. 1. Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.27.2013_RE RE Simon
Cordell Court case 27/02/2013 / Page Numbers: 1,2 1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 4 Lorraine Cordell RE_
Simon Cordell Court case / Page
Numbers: 25,26 “Enfield court / my
insurance” 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 5 Lorraine Cordell RE_ Simon
Cordell Court case _ (1) / Page
Numbers: 27,28 “Same as above” 3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 6 Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell Court case / Page
Numbers: 29,30 “Same as above” 4 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 7 Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon
Cordell Court case _ (1) / Page
Numbers: 31,32 “Same as above” 5 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 8 Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell Court case _ (2) / Page
Numbers: 33,34 “Same as above” |
27/02/2013 |
12:22:00 |
X2 1,2 |
|
|
1. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 1 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.27.2013_RE RE Simon
Cordell Court case 27/02/2013 / Page Numbers: 1,2 1, From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 27 February 2013
12:22 ' To: gl-thamesmcenq@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk Subject: RE: RE: Simon
Cordell Court case From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 27 February 2013
12:19 To: gl-thames.mcenq@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk Subject: RE: RE: Simon
Cordell Court case Hello Ø Again, I am writing
to get the case below reopened, Ø I have emailed as
you can see below, and I still have heard nothing about this case. Ø After a call that
was made today, I have been given a next email to send this email to in the
hope that it can be dealt with. Ø Please read the
below emails and can you please reply to say you have got this email. Many Thanks Mr Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:
lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 09 January 2013 13:20 To: gl-thames.mclist@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk Subject: RE: RE: Simon Cordell Court case To Whom It May Concern: Ø I sent an email on the 21/12/2012 about a case below, Ø I have not heard anything about this email. Ø
Please
can you confirm you have got the email with a reply to this email so that I
know this matter is being looked into. Many Thanks Mr Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 December 2012 16:47 To: gl-thames.mclist@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Court case To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am
writing this email after a call I made to the court about a case that was
heard about no insurance which the outcome was 6 points on my driving
licence and a £700 fine. Ø
My
Name and address are below Ø
Mr
Simon Cordell 23 Byron terrace Edmonton London N9 7DG 2, Ø
The problem I have with this is
yes, I was pulled up by the police and was asked to bring my insurance to a
police station which I did do, but it seem the police had given me the wrong
form so the police station would not accept me to give them my insurance
documents and said it would need to go to court. Ø
I have never heard anything
about this until I got a letter from DVLA saying I had to send my driving
licence back to them. Ø
I called DVLA to be told that
there was a court case which was heard and that I been given 6 points so
needed to send my driving licence to them to get these points added. Ø
I explained to them that I did
not know about any court date and that I did in fact have insurance to drive
on the day the police pulled me over. Ø
DVLA give me the court
information to contract the court which I did and was told I need to put in
that I did not know about the court date. Ø
I called Enfield court and was
told that I need to write a letter to them which I have done but as of
today’s date 21/12/2012 Ø
I have not heard anything back
from them. Ø
Today 21/12/2012 I got a
next letter from DVLA saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked
on the 22/12/2012 again, I
made a call to them which they have put a next 28 days onto the date that
they will revoke my driving licence, I have also made a
next call to the court and it seems I was given the wrong information and it
should have asked for the case to be reopened which I am doing now by send
you this email. Ø
Please could you reopen the
case so that I can indeed show the court I do in fact have insurance to have
been driving on the date I was pulled by the police, and as I said on the
phone to the court person, I speak to today I did not know about any dates
for court before I got the letter from DVLA. Ø
I will enclose in this email my
insurance documents so you can see in fact I was insurance, and could you
please send me a new date to go to court to prove this. Many Thanks 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 4 Lorraine Cordell RE_ Simon Cordell Court case /
Page Numbers: 25,26 “Enfield court / my insurance” From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 27 February 2013 12:19 To: 'glthames.mcenq@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk' Subject: RE: RE: Simon Cordell Court case Hello Ø Again, I am writing to get the case below reopened, Ø I have emailed as you can see below and I still have heard nothing
about this case. Ø After a call that was made today, Ø I have been given a next email to send this email to in the hope that
it can be dealt with. Ø Please read the below emails and can you please reply to say you have
got this email. Many Thanks Mr Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 09 January 2013 13:20 To: 'glthames.mclist@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk' Subject: RE: RE: Simon Cordell Court case To Whom It May Concern: I sent an email on the 21/12/2012 about a case below, I have not heard anything about this email. Please
can you confirm you have got the email with a reply to this email so that I
know this matter is being looked into. Many Thanks Mr Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 December 2012 16:47 To: 'glthames.mclist@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Court case To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email after a call I made to the court about a case
that was heard about no insurance which the outcome was 6 points on my
driving licence and a £700 fine. My Name and address are below Mr Simon Cordell 23 Byron Terrace Edmonton London N9 7DG The problem I have with this is yes I was pulled up by the police and
was asked to bring my insurance to a police station which I did do, but it
seem the police had given me the wrong form so the police station would not
accept me to give them my insurance documents and said it would need to go to
court, I have never heard anything about this until I got a letter from DVLA
saying I had to send my driving licence back to them, I called DVLA to be
told that there was a court case which was heard and that I been given 6
points so needed to send my driving licence to them to get these points
added, I explained to them that I did not know about any court date and that
I did in fact have insurance to drive on the day the police pulled me over. Page: 26 DVLA give me the court information to contract the court which I did
and was told I need to put in that I did not know about the court date. I
called Enfield court and was told that I need to write a letter to them which
I have done but as of today’s date 21/12/2012 I have not heard anything back from them. Today 21/12/2012 I got a next letter from
DVLA saying that my driving licence was going to be revoked on the 22/12/2012 again, I made a call to them which they have put a next 28 days onto
the date that they will revoke my driving licence, I have also made a next call to the court and it seems I was given the
wrong information and it should have asked for the case to be reopened which
I am doing now by send you this email. Please could you reopen the case so that I can indeed show the court I
do in fact have insurance to have been driving on the date I was pulled by
the police, and as I said on the phone to the court person, I speak to today
I did not know about any dates for court before I got the letter from DVLA. I will enclose in this email my insurance documents so you can see in
fact I was insurance, and could you please send me a new date to go to court
to prove this. Many Thanks Mr. Simon
Cordell |
||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
28/02/2013 |
|
|
Simulation March 2013 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
March 2013 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
01/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
02/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until
Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
03/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
04/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
05/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
06/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
07/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
08/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
09/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
10/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
11/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until
Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
12/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
13/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
14/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
15/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
16/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
17/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
18/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
19/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
20/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
21/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
22/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
23/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until
Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
24/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
25/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
26/03/2013 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
27/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
27/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
28/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
29/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
30/03/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
31/03/2013 |
|
|
Simulation April 2013 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
April 2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
01/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
02/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with under
policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
03/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
04/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
05/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until
Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
06/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. 1 ·
The 1st Asbo Folder / pub Book Issue: 1! CRIS report
4208625/13 Sunday Going Out on Motor Bikes Pc 466ht /224810 C. Scott / Page Numbers: Mag 2 – 143,144,145,146,147,148,149, 150,151,152,153,154,155,156, 157,158,159,160,161,162,163, 164,165,166,167,168,169,170, 171,172,173,174 Mag 1) Response: 108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116, 117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125, 126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134, 135,136, Appeal- 131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139, 140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148, 149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157, 158,159,160 07/04/2013 ·
2 Like a hurricane, they kept on tucking
into me; while forcibly Ripping, me apart: - ·
3 Police PNC Record 4 ·
Court Case: “Sunday Going out on my Motorbike for
the day.” 1. Wandering Around: -- 2. Next in, is Just, three out of three, quick short couple of notes; — 3.
A continuation of
the same day events: -- |
07/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 ·
The 1st Asbo Folder / pub Book Issue: 1! CRIS report
4208625/13 Sunday Going Out on Motor Bikes Pc 466ht /224810 C. Scott / Page Numbers: Mag 2 – 143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162, 163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174 Mag 1) Response: 108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127, 128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136, Appeal- 131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150, 151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160 07/04/2013 153, Data Protection Act – Dispose of As Confidential Waste PC SJ ELSMORE
752YE 206372
167, Data Protection Act – Dispose of As Confidential Waste PC SJ ELSMORE
752YE 206372
2 Like a hurricane,
they kept on tucking into me; while forcibly Ripping, me
apart: - Ø By the next date in reference being a
quarter of the way through 2013. Ø I say that things had become a constant
vision to me of the metropolitan police always bullying me, they would never,
stop intimidating me, it had become so bad that it had become a “reality” the
police just would not stop harassing me, victimising me, labelling me, right
up until the last final moments that I have to live to take my last final
breaths of air and then end up straight after, as getting claimed as a dead
body. Ø On the 07/04/2013 members
of the metropolitan police force yet again pulled me over to stop me in my
car, the reason given to me for being stopped by them while in my car, got
explained to be - Ø This error occurred, because my vehicle
insurance was still not showing up on the metropolitan police computer
systems. Ø When checked it stated that I never got
insured and that in some circumstances, different on duty police officers,
were having problems with being updated correctly, betraying to them, that I
might not have insurance to drive. Ø I had insurance at these different times;
as any reader of this report would also understand to be true, as well by
now; it was simple for the police on this occasion to handle this incident;
In a fair manner of law, to accept there was an error on the police and or
the MID database and this was at no fault of my own but as in most cases with
the police this did not happen. Ø This inelegance on the police national
computers got put into place due to me prior
being, incorrectly, stopped, so many times beforehand, by random
representing police officers of the law. Ø In the start of the case the police used
a summons against me, so to take me to court also, which I never receive,
adding, even more complications to my daily surprises; I was later to
find out that the judge who heard my case at the court, found me guilty in my
absence and after his or her hand, he or she added more driving points to my
driving licence and another fine. Ø A fine got issued in this case by the
judge, I and others worked hard, for us to get the case reopened in
co Hurst towards the rest of the court cases, that I got imposed
too. Ø In the final stages of the court case, I
ended up showing the court my insurance, so I won the case. Ø The Points did finally get removed of my
driving licence and the fine ended up being revoked; coincidentally. Proof of Insurance policy: Link 3 Police PNC Record Arrest Arrest/Summons Ref: 13/01HT/01/1537C Name Charged: CORDELL, SIMON PAUL Date of Birth: 26/01/81 Fingerprint Status: CONFIRMED 01FP 07/04/13 DNA Status: NOT TAKEN Process Stage: ARRESTED ON 07/04/2013 14:46 Photograph: 01HT 07/04/13 Arresting Officer: ASTON/PC/232845 Report Owner: 01 (METROPOLITAN POLICE) Prosecuting Agent: CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE (CPS) Last Updated: 07/04/2013 Remand Description: REMANDED ON BAIL ON 07/04/2013 At: AT 01HT To Appear at NEXT APPEARING
ON 23/07/2013 At: AT EAST LONDON MAGISTRATES. Owner: 01 (METROPOLITAN POLICE.) Crime Reference: 01HT/1537/13 23/07/2013 AT EAST LONDON MAGISTRATES COURT REF: Last Updated: 07/04/2013 07/04/2013: “Arrested” 23/07/2013: “Court & Won the Case but
now put into Asbo files by Met Police Force members!” 4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" +
"KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with
under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force
until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. 1
Insurance / Page Numbers: 36 Copy of my Insurance
Broadsure Direct |
08/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 01 Insurance / Page Numbers: 36 36 Subject: Fwd.: REF: 00-COSX14MT04-ID<23> Open Attach
Documents From: Rewired (re_wired@ymail.com) To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk; Date: Monday, 8
April 2013, 14:21 ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Gaheris Edwards Sent: Monday, 8
April 2013, 14:55 Subject: REF: 00-COSX14MT04-ID<23> Open Attach
Documents Ø As requested, Kind Regards, Gaheris Edwards |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
09/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
10/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
11/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
12/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
13/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
14/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. 1 ·
The
Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Insurance / Page Numbers: 22,23 proof of my insurance policy’s schedule |
15/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Insurance / Page Numbers: 37,38 On the Date off: Monday, 15 April 2013 at time: 15:14 Ø I decided to call my insurance company
and send an email so that I would get prove of my insurance policy’s schedule
and this is a copy of the email I received: - Subject: Documents From: Melanie Tyman: -- melanietwyman@broadsuredirect.com Dear Mr Cordell Ø Please see below the listed payment dates
and amounts of your new direct debit facility as discussed: Ø Payment Schedule Items Payment Date Type
of Payment Scheduled Payment Amounts Wednesday 24-Apr-2013.
Finally: Ø I can confirm, there is a balance owed to
Close Premium Finance, relating to your cancelled Motor Trade policy, Ø which ran from 12/10/2013 & 25/01/2014 the balance required is £157.42. Ø Please contact Close Premium Finance to
make payment of this balance, as agreed. Many thanks, Melanie Twyman Finance Manager. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
16/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
17/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
18/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
19/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
20/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
21/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
22/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
23/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
24/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
25/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
26/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
27/04/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
28/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
29/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
30/04/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Simulation May 2013 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
May 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. 1 ·
The
Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Insurance / Page Numbers: 28,29 Wanting to revoke my insurance 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Insurance, Hello I have
enclosed my driving licence / Page Numbers: Error |
01/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Insurance / Page Numbers: 43,44 43, Subject: Re: REF: 00-COSX14MT04-ID<24> Open Attach Documents From: Rewired (re_wired@ymail.com) To: jolidstone@broadsuredirect.com Date: Wednesday, 1 May 2013, 12:18 Hello Ø
please find enclosed my
driving license Simon Cordell From:
Jo
Lid stone <jolidstone@broadsuredirect.com> To:
'Rewired
' <re_wired@ymail.com> Sent:
Wednesday,
17 April 2013, 10:55 Subject:
RE: REF:
00-COSX14MT04-ID<24> Open Attach Documents Ø Good Morning Simon, Thank you for the
documents. We are s 44 Jo Lid stone Administration Department ---------------------------------------------------- Broadsure Direct -
Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax Number: 01843 594488 ---------------------------------------------------- This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential
and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed.
It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you are not the
intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in
reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to
the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we
are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications passing
through us network. ---------------------------------------------------- Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by
the Financial Services Authority. Attachments Driving Lic.jpg (133.01 KB) Driving LicBackPart.jpg (143.79 KB) Simin_Paper-Part.pdf (50.60 KB) image001.png (3.49 KB) 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Insurance, Hello I
have enclosed my driving licence / Page Numbers: Error On the Date of Wednesday, 1 May 2013, at 12:18: -- An email got sent
to my insurance firm regarding them wanting to revoke my insurance policy and
this is a copy of the email. Subject: Documents: -- From: Rewired re_wired@ymail.com To: jolidstone@broadsuredirect.com Ø Hello, I have enclosed my driving
licence; Mr. Simon Cordell. Proof of Insurance
policy: Link |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
02/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
03/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
04/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
05/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 ·
Additional Email
Attachments & Emails / Issue: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_05.06.2013_Wrongful
conviction and request to set aside the c 06/05/2013 / Page Numbers: 3,4,5,6 7,8,9,10,11,12 13,14,15,16,17,18 19,20,21,22,23,24 25,26,27 1 ·
The
Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 9 Lorraine Cordell Wrongful conviction
and request to set aside the conviction and re-open the case / Page Numbers: 45 |
06/05/2013 |
17:26:00 |
X25 3,4 5,6,7,8 9,10,11,12 13,14,15,16 17,18,19,20 21,22,23,24 25,26,27, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Number 2. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 2 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_05.06.2013_Wrongful
conviction and request to set aside the c 06/05/2013 / Page Numbers: 3,4,5,6 7,8,9,10,11,12 13,14,15,16,17,18 19,20,21,22,23,24 25,26,27 -- Page 3. From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 06 May 2013 17:26 To: gl-thamesmcenq@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk Cc: eastgroupcpo@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Wrongful conviction
and request to set aside the conviction and re-open the case Attachments:
Dear Sir or Madam Ø I have emailed your
court on a number of occasions regarding my conviction and sentence for no
insurance. Ø I am making this
request to have my case listed in order that I can do the following: -
Application to set
aside the conviction: - Ø On 22nd July 2012 I was stopped and
given a producer by the police as they did not believe that I held a valid
policy of insurance. Ø I attended the
police station and I was advised that my case would be going to court and I
would be summonsed in due course. Ø I never received
any summons in relation to this matter and I only became aware that the case
had been dealt with in my absence when I received a letter from the DVLA
advising me that I had to send in my driving licence. Ø I disputed with the
DVLA the points, but I was given an ultimatum that if I did not send in my
licence it would be revoked. Ø I therefore had no
choice but to send in my licence. Ø I immediately
contacted the Court by telephone, and I was advised to send an email. Ø I sent in a number
of emails and I have been given a number of emails, but I have not received
any confirmation from the court. Ø I forwarded a copy
of my insurance policy to the court and again this was ignored. Ø The offence of no
insurance was allegedly committed on 22nd July 2012. Ø I had a valid
policy of insurance from 23rd March 2012 and this policy was valid
until 22nd February 2013. Ø The company
insuring me was Tradex Insurance Company Limited. Ø I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon
Cordell and my policy number are L/WST/MTP/0192359. Ø I have points on my
licence which I should not have. Ø Can you please as a
matter of urgency email me back on this matter so that I can have a date so
that the conviction can be set aside and my case heard in order that I can
show the court my insurance and the PLO can make the necessary enquiries. Ø Once this has
happened, I would be grateful if the court could email the DVLA to advise
them that the points have been issued in error and the fine be set aside
also. Ø This matter is
urgent and is dragging on. I Ø cannot resolve this matter until the case is
listed before either a District Judge or Magistrates so I would appreciate
your cooperation. Ø I am very disappointed that you have
ignored all my emails. Ø This is causing me stress. Ø Can you now please resolve this
legal mater by listing the case for an application to set aside the
conviction? I can then forward my documents to the relevant prosecuting
authority. Ø I await hearing from you in
relation to this matter and I thank you in advance for your anticipated
co=operation in this matter. Yours faithfully Simon Cordell 4, Wrongful conviction
and request to set aside the conviction and re-open the case->S Cordell
Docs._GE_.pdf -- Insurance Company
Ltd Mr Simon Cordell
109, Burncroft Avenue Enfield EN3 7JQ 03 April 2012 Dear Mr Cordell, Policy Number:
L/WST/MTP/0192359 Reference: Motor Trade Policy Ø We have pleasure in
enclosing your policy documents. Ø These have been
issued in accordance with your instructions however we recommend that you thoroughly
check the enclosed and advise us immediately should any amendments be
required. Ø Thank you for
entrusting your business with us. Yours sincerely, Emma Guard (UW) Tradex Insurance
Company Ltd Tradex Insurance
Company Ltd Victory House, 7 Selsdon Way, London. E14 9GL DX551740, Isle of
Dogs 5 Tel 020 7001 9200 Fax 020 7068 7730 www.tradex.com Tradex Insurance
Company Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority
(no. 202917) FSA Registered in
England and Wales no. 2983873 at Victory House, 7 Selsdon Way, London E14 9GL
(Doc version 11.6.11) 5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18,
19,
20,
21,
22,
23,
24,
25,
26,
27,
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 9 Lorraine Cordell Wrongful
conviction and request to set aside the conviction and re-open the case / Page Numbers: 45 From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 06 May 2013 17:26 To: glthamesmcenq@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk Cc: eastgroupcpo@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Wrongful conviction and request to
set aside the conviction and reopen the case Attachments: RE: Simon Cordell Court case ; RE: Simon Cordell Court case ; RE: RE: Simon Cordell Court case ; RE: RE: Simon Cordell Court case ; RE: Simon Cordell Court case ; RE: Simon Cordell Court case ; S
Cordell Docs.GE.pdf Dear Sir or Madam Ø I have emailed your court on a number of
occasions regarding my conviction and sentence for no insurance. I am making
this request to have my case listed in order that I can do the following.
Ø I was stopped and given a producer by the
police as they did not believe that I held a valid policy of insurance. Ø I attended the police station and I was
advised that my case would be going to court and I would be summonsed in due
course. Ø I never received any summons in relation
to this matter and I only became aware that the case had been dealt with in
my absence when I received a letter from the DVLA advising me that I had to
send in my driving licence. Ø I disputed with the DVLA the points but I
was given an ultimatum that if I did not send in my licence it would be
revoked. Ø I therefore had no choice but to send in
my licence. Ø I immediately contacted the Court by
telephone and I was advised to send an email. Ø I sent in a number of emails and I have
been given a number of emails but I have not received any confirmation from
the court. Ø I forwarded a copy of my insurance policy
to the court and again this was ignored. Ø The offence of no insurance was allegedly
committed on 22/07/2012 Ø I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2013. Ø The company insuring me was Tradex
Insurance Company Limited. Ø I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon
Cordell and my policy number are L/WST/MTP/0192359. Ø I have points on my licence which I
should not have. Ø Can you please as a matter of urgency email
me back on this matter so that I can have a date so that the conviction can
be set aside and my case heard in order that I can show the court my
insurance and the PLO can make the necessary enquiries. Ø Once this has happened, I would be
grateful if the court could email the DVLA to advise them that the points
have been issued in error and the fine be set aside also. Ø This matter is urgent and is dragging on.
Ø I cannot resolve this matter until the
case is listed before either a District Judge or Magistrates so I would
appreciate your cooperation. I am very disappointed that you have ignored all
my emails. Ø This is causing me stress. Ø Can you now please resolve this legal
mater by listing the case for an application to set aside the conviction? Ø I can then forward my documents to the
relevant prosecuting authority. Ø I await hearing from you in relation to
this matter and I thank you in advance for your anticipated co=operation in
this matter. Yours faithfully Simon Cordell |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. 1
10 Lorraine Cordell RE Simon
Cordell Documents for court case / Page Numbers: 46 2
11 Forbes, Andrea_ Re
Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and re-open the
cad / Page Numbers: 47,48 3
12 Lorraine Cordell_ FW_
Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and re-open the
Cad / Page Numbers: 49,50 4
13 JOSEPHINE WARDS Re_
FW_ Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and re-open
the / Page Numbers: 51,52,53 5
14 JOSEPHINE Ward Re_ FW_
Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and re-open t2 / Page Numbers: 54,55,56,57 6
15 Lorraine Cordell RE_
FW_ Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and re-open / Page Numbers: 58,59,60 |
07/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 10 Lorraine Cordell RE Simon
Cordell Documents for court case / Page Numbers: 46 From:
Lorraine
Cordell Sent:
06
May 2013 18:30 To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD' Subject:
Re Simon
Cordell Documents for court case Attachments:
Bail_01.jpg; Bail_02.jpg; Bill_Of_Sale.jpg; MOT.jpg; Payment.jpg; S Cordell Cert. _GE_ (2).pdf; Vehicle_Seizure.jpg Hi Josey Ø Here are the documents you need for Simon. Lorraine 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 11 Forbes, Andrea_ Re
Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and re-open the
cad / Page Numbers: 47,48 From:
Forbes,
Andrea andrea.forbes@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk on behalf of GL Thames MC List glthamesmclist@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent:
07
May 2013 11:11 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: Wrongful
conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen the case Dear Mr Cordell, Ø I am in receipt of your email; these have been printed
off and passed to the reopening section to deal with. Ø There is a backlog due to the huge number of requests to
reopen, but you will hear from someone in due course. regards, Andrea (admin officer in Thames
Customer Service dept) From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 06 May 2013 17:26 To: glthamesmcenq@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk Cc: East Group CPO Subject: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen the case Dear Sir or Madam Ø
I have emailed your court
on a number of occasions regarding my conviction and sentence for no
insurance. I am making this request to have my case listed in order that I
can do the following.
Ø
I was stopped and given a
producer by the police as they did not believe that I held a valid policy of
insurance. Ø
I attended the police
station and I was advised that my case would be going to court and I would be
summonsed in due course. Ø
I never received any
summons in relation to this matter and I only became aware that the case had
been dealt with in my absence when I received a letter from the DVLA advising
me that I had to send in my driving licence. Ø
I disputed with the DVLA
the points but I was given an ultimatum that if I did not send in my licence
it would be revoked. Ø
I therefore had no choice
but to send in my licence. Ø
I immediately contacted
the Court by telephone and I was advised to send an email. Ø
I sent in a number of
emails and I have been given a number of emails but I have not received any
confirmation from the court. Ø
I forwarded a copy of my
insurance policy to the court and again this was ignored. Ø
The offence of no
insurance was allegedly committed on 22/07/2012 Ø
I had a valid policy of
insurance from 23/03/2012 and this policy was valid
until 22/02/2013. Ø
The company insuring me
was Tradex Insurance Company Limited. Ø
I am the named policy
holder, Mr. Simon Cordell and my policy number are L/WST/MTP/0192359. Ø
I have points on my
licence which I should not have. Ø
Can you please as a
matter of urgency email me back on this matter so that I can have a date so
that the conviction can be set aside and my case heard in order that I can
show the court my insurance and the PLO can make the necessary enquiries. Ø
Once this has happened, Ø
I would be grateful if
the court could email the DVLA to advise them that the points have been
issued in error and the fine be set aside also. Ø
This matter is urgent and
is dragging on. Ø
I cannot resolve this
matter until the case is listed before either a District Judge or Magistrates
so I would appreciate your cooperation. Ø
I am very disappointed
that you have ignored all my emails. Ø
This is causing me
stress. Ø
Can you now please
resolve this legal mater by listing the case for an application to set aside
the conviction? Ø I can then forward my documents to the relevant prosecuting 48 authority. Ø I await hearing from you in relation to this matter
and I thank you in advance for your anticipated co=operation in this matter. Yours
faithfully Simon Cordell 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 12 Lorraine Cordell_ FW_
Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and re-open the
Cad / Page Numbers: 49,50 From:
Lorraine
Cordell Sent:
07
May 2013 11:49 To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD' Subject:
FW: Wrongful
conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen the case Hi Josey Ø I got a reply from the court about re opening the case
for Simon see Below. From: Forbes, Andrea Mail To: andrea.forbes@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk On Behalf of GL Thames MC List Sent: 07 May 2013 11:11 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: RE: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen
the case Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
I am in receipt of your email;
these have been printed off and passed to the reopening section to deal with.
There is a backlog due to the huge number of requests to reopen, but you will
hear from someone in due course. regards, Andrea (admin officer in Thames Customer Service dept) From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 06 May 2013 17:26 To: glthamesmcenq@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk Cc: East Group CPO Subject: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen
the case Dear Sir or Madam I have emailed your court on a number of occasions regarding my
conviction and sentence for no insurance. I am making this request to have my case listed in order that I can do
the following. 1. Application to set aside the conviction 2. Reopen the case Application to set aside the conviction: On 22nd July 2012 I was stopped and given a producer by the
police as they did not believe that I held a valid policy of insurance. I attended the police station and I was advised that my case would be
going to court and I would be summonsed in due course. I never received any summons in relation to this matter and I only
became aware that the case had been dealt with in my absence when I received
a letter from the DVLA advising me that I had to send in my driving licence. I disputed with the DVLA the points, but I was given an ultimatum that
if I did not send in my licence it would be revoked. I therefore had no choice but to send in my licence. I immediately contacted the Court by telephone, and I was advised to
send an email. I sent in a number of emails and I have been given a number of emails,
but I have not received any confirmation from the court. I forwarded a copy of my insurance policy to the court and again this
was ignored. The offence of no insurance was allegedly committed on 22nd July 2012.
I had a valid policy of insurance from 23rd March 2012 and this policy
was valid until 22nd February 2013. The company insuring me was Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell and my policy number
are L/WST/MTP/0192359. I have points on my licence which I should not have.
Can you please as a matter of urgency email me back on 50 this matter so that I can have a date so that the conviction can be
set aside, and my case heard in order that I can show the court my insurance
and the PLO can make the necessary enquiries. Once this has happened, I would be grateful if the court could email the DVLA to advise them
that the points have been issued in error and the fine be set aside
also. This matter is urgent and is dragging on. I cannot resolve this matter until the case is listed before either a
District Judge or Magistrates so I would appreciate your cooperation. I am very disappointed that you have ignored all my emails. This is causing me stress. Can you now please resolve this legal mater by listing the case for an
application to set aside the conviction? I can then forward my documents to the relevant prosecuting authority.
I await hearing from you in relation to this matter and I thank you in
advance for your anticipated co=operation in this matter. Yours faithfully Simon Cordell 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 13 JOSEPHINE WARDS Re_ FW_ Wrongful
conviction and request to set aside the conviction and re-open the / Page Numbers: 51,52,53 From:
JOSEPHINE
WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent:
07
May 2013 14:32 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject:
Re: FW: Wrongful
conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen the case Hi Lorraine Ø At least progress is now being made. Ø Keep me posted and if you need any further help then
please do not hesitate to contact me on email / mobile. Kind regards Josephine On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:48 AM,
Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Hi Josey I got a reply from the court about re
opening the case for Simon see Below. From: Forbes, Andrea [Mail To:andrea.forbes@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] On Behalf of GL Thames MC List Sent: 07 May 2013 11:11 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: RE: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen
the case Dear Mr Cordell, I am in receipt of your email; these have been printed off and passed
to the reopening section to deal with. There is a backlog due to the huge
number of requests to reopen, but you will hear from someone in due course. regards, Andrea 52, To: glthamesmcenq@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk Cc: East Group CPO Subject: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen
the case Dear Sir or Madam I have emailed your court on a number of occasions regarding my
conviction and sentence for no insurance. I am making this request to have my case listed in order that I can do
the following;: 1. Application to set aside the conviction 2. Reopen the case Application to set aside the conviction:
On 22nd July 2012 I was stopped and given a producer by the police as they did not
believe that I held a valid policy of insurance. I attended the police
station and I was advised that my case would be going to court and I would be
summonsed in due course. I never received any summons in relation to this
matter and I only became aware that the case had been dealt with in my
absence when I received a letter from the DVLA advising me that I had to send
in my driving licence. I disputed with the DVLA the points, but I was given
an ultimatum that if I did not send in my licence it would be revoked. I
therefore had no choice but to send in my licence. I immediately contacted
the Court by telephone, and I was advised to send an email. I sent in a
number of emails and I have been given a number of emails, but I have not
received any confirmation from the court. I forwarded a copy of my insurance
policy to the court and again this was ignored. The offence of no insurance
was allegedly committed on 22nd July 2012. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23rd March 2012
and this policy was valid until 22nd
February 2013. The company insuring me was Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the
named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell and my policy number are
L/WST/MTP/0192359. I have points on my licence which I should not have. Can
you please as a matter of urgency email me back on this matter so that I can
have a date so that the conviction can be set aside and my case heard in order
that I can show the court my insurance and the PLO can make the necessary
enquiries. Once this has happened, I would be grateful if the court could
email the DVLA to advise them that the points have been issued in error and
the fine be set aside also. This matter is urgent and is dragging on. I
cannot resolve this matter until the case is listed before either a District
Judge or Magistrates so I would appreciate your cooperation. I am very
disappointed that you have ignored all my emails. This is causing me stress.
Can you now please resolve this legal mater by listing the case for an
application to set aside the conviction? I can then forward my documents to the relevant prosecuting authority. I await hearing from you in relation to this matter and I thank you in
advance for your anticipated co=operation in this matter. 53 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 14 JOSEPHINE Ward Re_ FW_ Wrongful
conviction and request to set aside the conviction and re-open t2 / Page Numbers: 54,55,56,57 From:
JOSEPHINE
WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent:
07
May 2013 17:46 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject:
Re: FW: Wrongful
conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen the case Lorraine Ø There are many ways to skin a cat. Ø Having thought about Simon's other case it may be better to wait until the hearing as we may be able to
make representation to the prosecutor on the day in question Ø that Simon did have a valid insurance policy and the
data base could not be accessed. Ø There were no warning markers re the van. Ø The whole reason for the stop of the vehicle had to be
ascertained as why Ø was he stopped in the first place, if not for no
insurance then for what? Ø I can refer them to the case re possession of the bladed
article. Ø Basically, I will argue that but for his van being
seized for no insurance for which he was not guilty and could have brought
his insurance to the station on a producer then the public order offence
would not have been committed. Ø We will play it by ear, I think. Regards Josephine On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Lorraine
Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: I think it was due to your email and
the wording lol - lol Lorraine From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent: 07 May 2013 14:32 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: FW: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen
the case Hi Lorraine Ø
At least progress is now being
made. Ø
Keep me posted and if you need
any further help then please do not hesitate to contact me on email / mobile. Kind regards Josephine On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:48 AM,
Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Hi Josey 55, I got a reply from the court about re
opening the case for Simon see Below. From: Forbes, Andrea [Mail To:andrea.forbes@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] On Behalf of GL Thames MC List Sent: 07 May 2013 11:11 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: RE: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen
the case Dear Mr Cordell, I am in receipt of your email; these have been printed off and passed to
the reopening section to deal with. There is a backlog due to the huge number
of requests to reopen, but you will hear from someone in due course. regards, Andrea (admin officer in Thames Customer Service dept) From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 May 2013 17:26 To: glthamesmcenq@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk Cc: East Group CPO Subject: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen
the case Dear Sir or Madam I have emailed your court on a number of occasions regarding my
conviction and sentence for no insurance. I am making this request to have my
case listed in order that I can do the following. 1. Application to set aside the conviction 2. Reopen the case 56, Application to set aside the conviction: On 22nd July 2012 I was stopped and given a producer by the police as they did not
believe that I held a valid policy of insurance. I attended the police
station and I was advised that my case would be going to court and I would be
summonsed in due course. I never received any summons in relation to this
matter and I only became aware that the case had been dealt with in my
absence when I received a letter from the DVLA advising me that I had to send
in my driving licence. I disputed with the DVLA the points, but I was given
an ultimatum that if I did not send in my licence it would be revoked. I
therefore had no choice but to send in my licence. I immediately contacted
the Court by telephone, and I was advised to send an email. I sent in a
number of emails and I have been given a number of emails, but I have not
received any confirmation from the court. I forwarded a copy of my insurance
policy to the court and again this was ignored. The offence of no insurance
was allegedly committed on 22nd July 2012. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23rd March 2012
and this policy was valid until 22nd
February 2013. The company insuring me was Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the
named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell and my policy number are
L/WST/MTP/0192359. I have points on my licence which I should not have. Can you please as
a matter of urgency email me back on this matter so that I can have a date so
that the conviction can be set aside and my case heard in order that I can
show the court my insurance and the PLO can make the necessary enquiries.
Once this has happened, I would be grateful if the court could email the DVLA to advise them
that the points have been issued in error and the fine be set aside also. This matter is urgent and is dragging on. I cannot resolve this matter until the case is listed before either a
District Judge or Magistrates so I would appreciate your cooperation. I am very disappointed that you have ignored all my emails. This is causing me stress. Can you now please resolve this legal mater by listing the case for an
application to set aside the conviction? I can then forward my documents to the relevant prosecuting authority.
I await hearing from you in relation to this matter and I thank you in
advance for your anticipated co=operation in this matter. Yours faithfully Simon Cordell 57 N/a 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 15 Lorraine Cordell RE_ FW_
Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and re-open / Page Numbers: 58,59,60 From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
07
May 2013 14:34 To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD' Subject:
RE: FW: Wrongful
conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen the case Ø I think it was due to your email and the wording lol -
lol Lorraine From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent: 07 May 2013 14:32 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: FW: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen the case Hi Lorraine Ø
At least progress is now being
made. Ø
Keep me posted and if you need
any further help then please do not hesitate to contact me on email / mobile. Kind regards Josephine On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:48 AM,
Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Hi Josey Ø I got a reply from the court about re opening the case
for Simon see Below. From: Forbes, Andrea [Mail To:andrea.forbes@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] On Behalf of GL Thames MC List Sent: 07 May 2013 11:11 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: RE: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen
the case Dear Mr Cordell, I am in receipt of your email; these have been printed off and passed
to the reopening section to deal with. There is a backlog due to the huge
number of requests to reopen, but you will hear from someone in due course. regards, Andrea (admin officer in Thames Customer Service dept) From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 May 2013 17:26 To: glthamesmcenq@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk Cc: East Group CPO Subject: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen
the case Dear Sir or Madam I have emailed
your court on a number of occasions regarding my conviction and sentence for
no insurance. I 59, am making this request to have my case listed in order that I can do
the following: - 1. Application to set aside the conviction 2. Re-open the case Application to set aside the conviction: - On 22nd July 2012 I was stopped and given a producer by the police as they did not
believe that I held a valid policy of insurance. I attended the police
station and I was advised that my case would be going to court and I would be
summonsed in due course. I never received any summons in relation to this
matter and I only became aware that the case had been dealt with in my
absence when I received a letter from the DVLA advising me that I had to send
in my driving licence. I disputed with the DVLA the points, but I was given an ultimatum that
if I did not send in my licence it would be revoked. I therefore had no
choice but to send in my licence. I immediately contacted the Court by
telephone, and I was advised to send an email. sent in a number of emails and I have been given a number of emails,
but I have not received any confirmation from the court. I forwarded a copy of my insurance policy
to the court and again this was ignored. The offence of no insurance was allegedly committed on 22nd July 2012. I had a valid policy of insurance from 23rd March 2012 and this
policy was valid until 22nd February 2013. The company insuring me was Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell and my policy number
are L/WST/MTP/0192359. I have points on my licence which I should not have. Can you please as
a matter of urgency email me back on this matter so that I can have a date so
that the conviction can be set aside and my case heard in order that I can
show the court my insurance and the PLO can make the necessary enquiries. Once this has happened, I would be grateful if the court could email the DVLA to advise them
that the points have been issued in error and the fine be set aside
also. This matter is urgent and is dragging on. I cannot resolve this matter until the case is listed before either a
District Judge or Magistrates so I would appreciate your cooperation. I am very disappointed that you have ignored all my emails. This is causing me stress. Can you now please resolve this legal mater by listing the case for an
application to set aside the conviction? I can then forward my documents to
the relevant prosecuting authority. I await hearing from you in relation to this matter and I thank you in
advance for your anticipated co=operation in this matter. Yours faithfully Simon Cordell 60 N/a |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
08/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
09/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
10/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
11/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
12/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
13/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
14/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1 ·
Update! “Penalty Notice I got pulled
over by police in a petrol station in se1 London.” Arrest |
15/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Update! “Penalty Notice I got pulled
over by police in a petrol station in se1 London.” Arrest
Arrest/Summons Ref: 13/0000/00/484853Z Name Charged: CORDELL, SIMON Date of Birth: 26/01/81 Fingerprint Status: NOT TAKEN DNA Status: NOT TAKEN Process Stage: REPORTED ON 15/05/2013 21:10
Arresting Officer: O'MAHONEY/PC/226527 Report Owner: 01 (METROPOLITAN POLICE) Prosecuting Agent: CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE
(CPS) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
16/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
17/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
18/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
19/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
20/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
21/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
22/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
23/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
23/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
24/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
25/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
26/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
27/05/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
27/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
28/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
29/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
30/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
31/05/2013 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Simulation June 2013 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
June 2013 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
01/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
02/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
03/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
04/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
05/06/2013 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
06/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
07/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
08/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
09/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
10/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
11/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
12/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
13/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
14/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
15/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
16/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
17/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
18/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
19/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
20/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
21/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
22/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
23/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
23/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
24/06/2013 |
|
|
|
Emails were put on
this date that belonged to the 24/07/2013 they have been moved their now. The Diary still
needs updating! |
||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. 1 Wrongful imprisonment
the Gazebo Case: -- |
25/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
26/06/2013 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
27/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
27/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
28/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
29/06/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
30/06/2013 |
|
|
Simulation July 2013 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
July 2013 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
01/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
02/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
03/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
04/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
05/07/2013 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
06/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
07/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
08/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
09/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
10/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
11/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
12/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
13/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
14/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
15/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
16/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
17/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
18/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
19/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
20/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
21/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
22/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
23/07/2013 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. 1. 3 Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_07.24.2013_re open matter 24/07/2013 / Page Numbers: 28 |
24/07/2013 |
11:48:00 |
X1 CHECK 28 |
|
|
1.
|
1. 4 Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 4 joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_07.24.2013_RE re open matter 24/07/2013 / Page Numbers: 29,30 1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 52
Lorraine Cordell RE_ Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the
conviction and re-open the / Page Numbers: 113,114,115 Driving
Ban (1)/? Thames Court! 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 17 Miller, Joanne_ Re open
matter / Page Numbers: 65 3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 18 Miller, Joanne_ Reopen
matter / Page Numbers: 66,67 |
24/07/2013 |
12:33:00 |
X2 29,30 |
|
3. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_07.24.2013_re open matter 24/07/2013 / Page Numbers: 28 -- 28, From: Miller,
Joanne joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 24 July 2013 11:48 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: re open
matter Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
Thank you for your
email of today in
relation to your case being re-opened. Ø
I have checked our
system and have seen that the matter was re listed on the 22/07/2013 and on that date the conviction and
sentence that was imposed on the 14/11/2012 has been set aside and the endorsement on your driving
licence will be removed, also any financial penalty imposed will be removed
and no money will be owed my you. Ø
Hope this
information helps you. Joanne Miccer East London Magistrates' Court
Thames, Stratford and Waltham Forest Email joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk This e-mail (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you
are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the
sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a
secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by
someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material
in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are
the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the
Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and
e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure
laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email
was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi
may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 4. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 4 joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_07.24.2013_RE re open matter 24/07/2013 / Page Numbers: 29,30 -- 29, From: Miller, Joanne Sent: 24 July 2013 12:33 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: re open matter Mr Cordell Ø
There are some cases
where the person involved in the re-opening matter does not need to attend
court but in all cases, people should be informed of the date of hearing, not
sure this was not done in this case, but as long as the outcome was right for
you, I am pleased to hear that. regards Joanne Miccer East London Magistrates'
Court Thames, Stratford and Waltham Forest Email joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 24 July 2013 12:27 To: Miller, Joanne Subject: RE: re open matter Dear Miller, Joanne Thank you for the reply in this matter we were
not aware the case had been listed for the 22/07/2013, But the outcome the
court has made is correct. Once again thank you for the update in this
matter. Mr. Simon Cordell From: Miller, Joanne mailto: joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 24 July 2013 11:48 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: re open matter Dear Mr Cordell, Thank you for your email of today in relation to your case being
re-opened. I have checked our system and have seen that the matter was re
listed on the 22.07.13 and on that date the conviction and sentence that was
imposed on the 14.11.12 has been set aside and the endorsement on your
driving licence will be removed, also any financial penalty imposed will be
removed and no money will be owed my you. Hope this information helps you. Joanne Miccer East London Magistrates' Court Thames, Stratford and Waltham Forest
Email joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is
not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. 30, Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding
whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at
any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership
with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi
this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the
Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of
problems, please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is
not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at
any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership
with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi
this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 52 Lorraine Cordell RE_
Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and re-open the / Page Numbers: 113,114,115 From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
24
July 2013 09:29 To: 'GL Thames MC List' Subject:
RE: Wrongful
conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen the case Dear Sir or Madam Ø I am writing this letter as I still do not have a court
date to clear this matter up and I still have points on my licence which I
should not have due to this. Ø I do understand that in your reply to my email you had a
backlog but had passed on the paper to have the case re opened. It has been
some time and I have not heard anything about this and wonder if you can
check into this and find out how long it will take to get a new date from the
court. Yours faithfully Simon Cordell From: Forbes, Andrea [Mail To:andrea.forbes@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] On Behalf of GL Thames MC List Sent: 07 May 2013 11:11 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: RE: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen the case Dear Mr Cordell, I am in receipt of your email; these have been printed off and passed
to the reopening section to deal with. There is a backlog due to the huge
number of requests to reopen, but you will hear from someone in due course. regards, Andrea (admin officer in Thames Customer Service dept) From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 May 2013 17:26 To: glthamesmcenq@hmcts.gsl.gov.uk Cc: East Group CPO Subject: Wrongful conviction and request to set aside the conviction and reopen
the case Dear Sir or Madam I have emailed your court on a number of occasions regarding my
conviction and sentence for no insurance. I am making this request to have my
case listed in order that I can do the following;: 1.Application to set aside the conviction 2. Reopen the case Application to set aside the conviction: On 22nd July 2012 I was stopped and given a producer by the police as they did not
believe that I held a valid policy of insurance. I attended the police station
and I was advised that my case would be going to court and I would be
summonsed in due course. I never received any summons in relation to this
matter and I only became aware that the case had been dealt with in my
absence when I received a letter from the DVLA advising me that I had to send
in my driving licence. I disputed with the DVLA the points, but I was given
an ultimatum that if I did not send in my licence it would be revoked. I
therefore had no choice but to send in my licence. I immediately 114, contacted the Court by telephone and I was advised to send an email. I
sent in a number of emails and I have been given a number of emails, but I
have not received any confirmation from the court. I forwarded a copy of my insurance policy
to the court and again this was ignored. The offence of no insurance was
allegedly committed on 22nd July 2012 I had a valid policy of insurance from 23rd March 2012 and this policy was valid until 22nd February 2013 The company insuring me was Tradex Insurance Company Limited. I am the
named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell and my policy number are
L/WST/MTP/0192359. I have points on my licence which I should not have. Can
you please as a matter of urgency email me back on this matter so that I can
have a date so that the conviction can be set aside and my case heard in
order that I can show the court my insurance and the PLO can make the
necessary enquiries. Once this has happened, I would be grateful if the court
could email the DVLA to advise them that the points have been issued in error
and the fine be set aside also. This matter is urgent and is dragging on. I
cannot resolve this matter until the case is listed before either a District
Judge or Magistrates so I would appreciate your cooperation. I am very
disappointed that you have ignored all my emails. This is causing me stress.
Can you now please resolve this legal mater by listing the case for an
application to set aside the conviction? I can then forward my documents to
the relevant prosecuting authority. I
await hearing from you in relation to this matter and I thank you in advance
for your anticipated co=operation in this matter. Yours faithfully Simon Cordell 115 N/a 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 17 Miller, Joanne_ Re open matter /
Page Numbers: 65 From: Miller, Joanne [joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 24 July 2013 11:48 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: re open matter Dear Mr Cordell, Thank you for your email of today in relation to your case being
re-opened. I have checked our system and have seen that the matter was re listed
on the 22/07/2013 and on that date the conviction and sentence that was imposed on the 14/11/2012 has been set aside and the endorsement on your driving licence will be removed, also any financial penalty imposed will be removed and no money will
be owed my you. Hope this information helps you. Joanne Mifljer East London Magistrates' Court Thames, Stratford and Waltham Forest
Email joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 18 Miller, Joanne_ Reopen matter /
Page Numbers: 66,67 From: Miller, Joanne [joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 24
July 2013 12:33 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: re open matter Mr Cordell There are some cases where the person involved in the re-opening
matter does not need to attend court but in all cases, people should be
informed of the date of hearing, not sure this was not done in this case, but
as long as the outcome was right for you, I am pleased to hear that. regards Joanne Mifljer East London Magistrates' Court Thames, Stratford and Waltham Forest
Email joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 24 July 2013 12:27 To: Miller, Joanne Subject:
RE: re open
matter Dear Miller, Joanne Thank you for the reply in this
matter we were not aware the case had been listed for the 22/07/2013 But the outcome the court has made is
correct. Once again thank you for the update
in this matter. Mr. Simon Cordell From: Miller, Joanne [Mail To: joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 24
July 2013 11:48 To: 'lorraine32@bl ueyonder.co.uk' Subject: re open matter Dear Mr Cordell, Thank you for your email of today in relation to your case being
re-opened. I have checked our system and have seen that the matter was re
listed on the 22/07/2013 and on that date the conviction and sentence that was imposed on the 14/11/2012 has been set aside and the endorsement on your driving licence will be
removed, also any financial penalty imposed will be removed and no money will
be owed my you. Hope this information
helps you. Joanne Mifljer East London Magistrates' Court Thames, Stratford and Waltham Forest
Email joanne.miller@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk 67 N/a |
||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
25/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
26/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
27/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
28/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
29/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
30/07/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
31/07/2013 |
|
|
Simulation August 2013 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
August 2013 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
01/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
02/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
03/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
04/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
05/08/2013 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
06/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
07/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
08/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
09/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
10/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
11/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
12/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
13/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
14/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
15/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
16/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
17/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
18/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
19/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
20/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
21/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
22/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
23/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
24/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
25/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
26/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
27/08/2013 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
28/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
29/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
30/08/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
31/08/2013 |
|
|
Simulation September 2013 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
September 2013 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
01/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
02/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
03/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
04/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
05/09/2013 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
06/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
07/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
08/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
09/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
10/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
11/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
12/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
13/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
14/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
15/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
16/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
17/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
18/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
19/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
20/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
21/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
22/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
23/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
24/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
25/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
26/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
27/09/2013 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
28/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
29/09/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
30/09/2013 |
|
|
Simulation October 2013 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
October 2013 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
01/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
02/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
03/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
04/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
05/10/2013 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
06/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
07/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
08/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
09/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
10/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
11/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
12/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
13/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
14/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
15/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
16/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
17/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
18/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
19/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
20/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
21/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
22/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
23/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
24/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
25/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
26/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
27/10/2013 |
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. 1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: Insurance / Page Numbers: 259,260 Broadsure 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 112. 'I Car Check / Page
Numbers: 261 Broadsure 3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 113.
'I Car Check_ (1) / Page Numbers: 262 Broadsure |
28/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Insurance / Page Numbers: 259,260 Date: Monday, 28 October 2013, 15:20 Subject: Documents From: Gaheris Edwards gaheris@broadsuredirect.com To: re_wired@ymail.com; Ø
As
requested, please find attached your full certificate of motor insurance. A
duplicate will be posted to you today. Kind Regards, Gaheris
Edwards. 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 112. 'I Car Check / Page Numbers: 261 From:
'iCarCheck.net
Vehicle checks' [support@icarcheck.net] Sent:
28
October 2013 15:13 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
Your
I Car Check Vehicle History Receipt Attachments:
I
CarCheck_reciept6807f19d353c4ffb98e6836b23042a92.pdf Ø Please find attached
your receipt for your I Car check purchase 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 113. 'I Car Check_ (1) / Page Numbers: 262 From: 'iCarCheck.net Vehicle checks' [support@icarcheck.net] Sent: 28 October 2013 15:17 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Your I Car Check Vehicle History Receipt Attachments: I CarCheck_reciept6807f19d353c4ffb98e6836b23042a92.pdf Ø Please find attached your receipt for your I Car
check purchase |
||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
29/10/2013 |
|
|
|
1 Police! Ø Case for wrongful accusations
of no insurance. Ø I then had to pick
up my vehicle from the compound and pay for this then the Police used the
incident and got summoned me to court for no insurance. 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Festival Work Enfield Town / Page Numbers: Error Date: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 21:20 Subject: Re: Gen Power From: Rewired re_wired@ymail.com To: garyhurst1987@hotmail.co.uk Cc: darrenrleonard@tiscali.co.uk Hi Gary Ø Thank you for the email. Ø This very late notice has now
made me lose contracts to hire out the gen, as I could have had other
bookings, but knew I was booked for yourself. Ø I did email Darren last week to
confirm the booking, as for the gen not being able to cope with your needs, Ø I know it would be fully
capable to cope with all the requirements that we agree on and much more, as
you know I did have a problem with my van which due to me knowing I was doing
this event with you I made sure I paid to get it fixed so I did not let
anyone down, as it was for the local community. Mr. Simon. |
||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
30/10/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
31/10/2013 |
|
|
Simulation November 2013 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
November 2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
01/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
02/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
03/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
04/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
05/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
06/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
07/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
08/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
09/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
10/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
11/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
12/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Insurance: Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds
Bank" I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on the 23/02/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when it lapsed. |
13/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
0 ·
Brixton High Street (Driving Ban, Loss
of Van / Loss of Nightclub Manager Job) 14/11/2013 1 ·
Rory
Geoghegan Police Officer! Brixton Case! 2 ·
Getting a job As
a night club manager! Brixton Case! 3 ·
My 1st Asbo Response Bundle/ pub Book Issue: 1! TRANSCRIPT OF TELEPHONE
CALL MADE BETWEEN PC GEOGHAN/ Page
Numbers: 205,206,207,208 Police got caught on tape
setting me up! Asbo Response Bundle Brixton Case! 4 ·
The Ringing
Tone Call to insurance
company! Brixton Case! 5 ·
Simon Cordell’s MP3’S Indexed Stage 1 1x Recording INFO ABOUT
RECORDING Night club job 01m. 22_11_2013 _S.
Cordell call at roadside with Police Date: 14/11/2013 Page Number: Update Page
Number 1, 1. 01m. 22_11_2013 _S.
Cordell call at roadside with Police.docx 2. 01m. 22_11_2013 _S.
Cordell call at roadside with Police.htm 3. 01m. 22_11_2013 _S.
Cordell call at roadside with Police.mp3 |
14/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
0 Brixton
High Street (Driving Ban, Loss of Van / Loss of Nightclub Manager Job) 14/11/2013 Ø 14th November 2013 at Brixton Hill and I had my van seized. Ø
There was a case
heard on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my son Simon Cordell
was found guilty of using his vehicle for business purposes KGM who
my son was insured with. Ø
I am sure that the
letter that has been sent of Indemnity from KGM. But
this is having an effect on my life my driving licence has been revoked 3
times for no insurance 1 The Brixton case: -- Ø
The 26/11/2014 Ø
on this date I had a
court case at Wimbledon magistrates court that I had got orders to attend the
Brixton courthouse in reference towards, an incident that did get related
too, where I got accused of using my vehicle insurance policy for other
business reasons than the policy got taken out by me for. Ø
I got found guilty Ø
and attended home in
anger with a driving ban, the case latter got overturned in my favour. 1 Rory Geoghegan Police Officer! 1. 2. 2 Getting a job as a night club
manager; -- Ø
I had
been out looking for more work when I came across a gentleman who was redeveloped
a night club in Brixton, what was to get named, as Brixton’s white sands
night club. Ø
This got
done while it had been getting built, I spoke to the owner and showed him what
I was capable of doing for his company. Ø
He got
very impressed with my CV and as a result offered me the position of
nightclub manager. Ø
To make
sure that I kept on the owners’ books of good workers, I travelled backwards
and forwards from my home to the club on a regular basis and in doing this I
noticed that I could speed up the process and offered to help move some left
other demolition materials to an environmental waste site. Ø
On the 14/11/2013 Ø
I was
travelling with my friend named dean, we were together in my van and driving
to Brixton, as we were travelling along Brixton high road. Ø
We had
got about 400 yards to where I was to park my van outside of the night club
and the police officers decided to pull us over, as I hit the 400 yards’,
mark I had to drive past some police stop and search patrol who were doing
some; “Roadside” Apr checks, on passing vehicles. Ø
They got
placed on the same side of the road as the up-and-coming night club, as I
drove past the police and their cars, we never got stopped. Ø
I
managed to pull over to where I had wanted to stop, outside of the club,
without any problems so far. The owner of the club had not arrived yet on
this day, so I decided to wait in the van. Ø
My
friend decided to jump out and quickly go to a local shop to buy some drinks
and so forth. Ø
When I
noticed some police, officer come up to the driver's door window and tell me
to get out of my van, I asked him why I should do this and what for. Ø
He
explained that I had not shown up without any insurance on their computer
systems as I had driven past them as always, I understood and knew that I had
the correct insured to be driven. Ø
I
explained to the police officer that I was attending the location as I had
got a manager's job at the new nightclub and continued to show him a copy of
my policy while explaining to him why my van may show up as a not insured. Ø
A PC
Geoghegan decided to do a full search of myself and of the inside of my van,
on him doing so he finding the business card that I had previously made for
my friend on my dashboard On PC Geoghegan doing this I passed him my own
mobile phone so that he could speak to my insurance companies as I had called
them while he got engaged in my van. Ø
I could
hear him speaking to the employees on the phone and then explaining that I
have social and domestic and a motor trade policy in place this did include
high performance cars, my insurance company was adamant to the police officer
that I got covered to drive the van now then in question. Ø
With
this information being provided to the police officer, he decided to say that
I would not get covered if I had tools of another trade on me, to which I did
not. Ø
He
decided to seize my van because he had found the business card that I had made
for dean to do with painting, so I refused to get out of the van and
surrender my keys to him. Ø
Eventfully
he also decided to arrest me for a breach of the peace. Ø
finally,
being booked into the police station I had no additional property with me and
got held till the next day’s early hours of the morning with finally being
charged for driving with no insurance as the officer claimed that my
insurance policy was not in restraints of the policy underwriting. Ø
When I
got finally realised, I had to go and pick my van up from the police car
compound, in doing so I decided to recorded in audio format the ongoing, what
did in fact happen was I asked to speak to the car compounds manager who is a
civilian, I asked him to see a copy of the van's seizure notice, the reason I
had done this was because it would show any belongings that got left in the
van as they have got to get signed for by the arresting or seizing police
officer. Ø
In the
car compounds manager, helping me with my request, he also noticed that there
were no other tools of the trade within the side of the van and that it got
signed that I never took anything out of the van, I collected the van and
then headed back to my home. Ø
So, on
the 14/11/2013; I had to yet again attend court to defend myself from
their wrongful allegations. Ø
What in
fact did happen to me is that I got left in amazement by being found guilty
of the offences after the PC Geoghegan stood and gave evidence from his
police notebook from the day's? Ø
Being
upset with knowing that I was right, and all I did was carry business cards
in my van that I had made for dean’s own company, I explained to the judge
that the police officer was being deceitful with his evidence and asked him
to give me a chance to prove the truth by requesting a copy of the sound
audio recording from the insurance company from when the police officer had
first pulled me over. Ø
The
Judge granted my request, and I applied to the insurance company for the
sound recording evidence to get realised to me. Ø
On
receiving my request of the recordings, I could prove that I was right as I
now had both recording from the roadside and car compound. Ø
I
applied for an appeal hearing to take place at the courthouse. Ø
Very
soon after this day arrived, and I was on my way to court, I felt a bit of a
mess due to what had been going on to me by every person that did get
involved in hurting me. Ø
In the
courtroom the appeal started to go ahead, I can remember the day being a
repeat of the trial where I had wrongfully got found guilty in the first
instance, till right up until my solicitor asked the police officer to stop
going over his evidence from his police notebook. Ø
When the
police officer did do as he had got asked to do by my barrister on the day
made sure to confirm with him that his notes were correct from the day's
events and looked at a CD player that he had earlier put a copy of the audio
recording made by me with PC Geoghegan, talking to them. Ø
On
playing the audio CD for a few seconds, my solicitor then stopped the CD and
asked PC Geoghegan; if this was his voice; for him to confirm the answer: PC
Geoghegan, agreed while under oath that it was his voice on the CD and this
was to his surprise. Ø
There is
a copy of the official sound audio transcribed from them days. Ø
Hang on
first just to confirm one more thing even stronger than before I did not have
any other tools of trade in my van on the day of events. 3 My 1st Asbo Response Bundle/ pub Book
Issue: 1! TRANSCRIPT OF TELEPHONE CALL
MADE BETWEEN PC GEOGHAN/ Page Numbers: 205,206,207,208 Police got caught on tape
setting me up!
4 Call to insurance company A continuation of the 14/11/2013.
5 1x Recording INFO ABOUT
RECORDING Night club job 01m. 22_11_2013
_s Cordell call at roadside with Police / Date: 14/11/2013 1.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pick up of My Van
from the Police Car Compound: -- 1. 5 Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_11.15.2013_FW RE
Simon Cordell 15/11/2013 / Page Numbers: 31,32 1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 128. x2hmm Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell / Page
Numbers: 280 Broadsure Insurance! Brixton Case! 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 129. Lorraine Cordell
_FW_ RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 281 Broadsure Insurance! Brixton Case! 3 ·
Telephone Recording of Insurance Company! Broadsure Insurance! Brixton Case! 4 ·
Simon Cordell’s MP3’S Indexed Stage 1 1x Recording INFO ABOUT
RECORDING 01m.
26_11_2013_Kelly Tiller Kelly call to compound 15_ll_2013_ll_53_Kelly Tiller
Kelly call to compound Page
Number: Update Page Number 1, 15/11/2013 01m.
26_11_2013_Kelly Tiller call to compound.docx 2. 01m.
26_11_2013_Kelly Tiller call to compound.htm 3. 01m.
26_11_2013_Kelly Tiller call to compound.mp3 |
15/11/2013 |
13:57:00 |
X2 31,32 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
5. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 5 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_11.15.2013_FW RE Simon Cordell 15/11/2013 / Page
Numbers: 31,32 -- 31, From: Lorraine
Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Attachments: Van-reciept-10-11-2013.jpg Dear martin Ø After a next call and talking to oily he asked me to send over the
receipt of me buying the van please see attached scan. Ø I am waiting for the new logbook to come from DVLA. Simon From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 15 November 2013 13:07 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Martin Ø Today the 15/11/13 I made a call to be able to speak to you
with regard to what happened yesterday the 14/11/2013 with the police.
Ø I have talked to Oilly today and he asked me to write this email to
you as they are thinking of closing my insurance policy. Ø Yesterday I went for a meeting with the owner of a night club for a
future job position the meeting was set for 14.00 hours. Ø I drove down for my meeting and got there at around 13.00 hours
there were some police at the roadside doing stops on cars etc, as I drove
pass and pulled over to park by the night club, my friend who was with me got
out of the van to get some drinks and food while I waited in the van, as I
got to the club early for my meeting. Ø The police that were doing the stops came up to me, they told me
they wanted to do some checks on the van I was sitting in, I asked why, and
they told me under the road traffic act. Ø I then passed the police my insurance policy for them to go over,
the police officer also asked me why I had stopped there. Ø I explained to him I had a meeting in the night club that we were
outside, as it was due to open to the public in 1-month time to secure my
future position there. Ø While I was there, I was also planning on asking if there were any
painting jobs, I explained all this to the police officer I was talking to. Ø The police looked inside the van and clearly saw it was empty and
that there were also no signs on the van showing it to be a company van. Ø But the police officer was still unhappy. Ø He talked to yourselves as the insurance company on the phone and
was told I was not insured, at what point I called you myself as my insurance
company as I knew I was insured. Ø I explained the situation to yourselves to be told I was covered for
commuting to work, social and domestic, as well as motor trade, but not for
carriage of goods for a company, which did not matter as my van was empty and
still is whilst being in the police impound. Ø I am putting in a complaint to the independent complaints commission
in regard to the unlawful seizure of my vehicle. Ø Further to this would it please be possible to find out the status
of my insurance policy and the reasons as to why I have been told you are in
the process of closing my policy. Yours sincerely Mr Simon Cordell 32,
End of Picture! 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 128.
x2hmm Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 280 From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:07 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Martin Ø Today the 15/11/13
I made a call to be able to speak to you with regard to what happened
yesterday the 14/11/2013 with the police. Ø I have talked to Oilly
today and he asked me to write this email to you as they are thinking of
closing my insurance policy. Ø Yesterday I went for a
meeting with the owner of a night club for a future job position the meeting
was set for 14.00 hours. Ø I drove down for my
meeting and got there at around 13.00 hours there were some police at the
roadside doing stops on cars etc, as I drove pass and pulled over to park by
the night club, my friend who was with me got out of the van to get some
drinks and food while I waited in the van, as I got to the club early for my
meeting. Ø The police that were
doing the stops came up to me, they told me they wanted to do some checks on
the van I was sitting in, I asked why, and they told me under the road
traffic act. Ø I then passed the
police my insurance policy for them to go over, the police officer also asked
me why I had stopped there. Ø I explained to him I
had a meeting in the night club that we were outside, as it was due to open
to the public in 1-month time to secure my future position there. Ø While I was there, I
was also planning on asking if there were any painting jobs, I explained all
this to the police officer I was talking to. Ø The police looked
inside the van and clearly saw it was empty and that there were also no signs
on the van showing it to be a company van. Ø But the police officer
was still unhappy. Ø He talked to yourselves
as the insurance company on the phone and was told I was not insured, at what
point I called you myself as my insurance company as I knew I was insured. Ø I explained the
situation to yourselves to be told I was covered for commuting to work,
social and domestic, as well as motor trade, but not for carriage of goods
for a company, which did not matter as my van was empty and still is whilst
being in the police impound. Ø I am putting in a
complaint to the independent complaints commission in regard to the unlawful seizure
of my vehicle. Ø Further to this would
it please be possible to find out the status of my insurance policy and the
reasons as to why I have been told you are in the process of closing my
policy. Yours
sincerely Mr
Simon Cordell 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 129.
Lorraine Cordell _FW_ RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 281 From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Attachments: Vanreciept10112013.jpg Dear martin After a next call and talking to oily he
asked me to send over the receipt of me buying the van please see attached
scan. I am waiting for the new logbook to come from DVLA. Simon From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:07 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Martin Ø Today the 15/11/13
I made a call to be able to speak to you with regard to what happened
yesterday the 14/11/2013 with the police. Ø I have talked to Oilly
today and he asked me to write this email to you as they are thinking of
closing my insurance policy. Ø Yesterday I went for a
meeting with the owner of a night club for a future job position the meeting
was set for 14.00 hours. Ø I drove down for my
meeting and got there at around 13.00 hours there were some police at the
roadside doing stops on cars etc, as I drove pass and pulled over to park by
the night club, my friend who was with me got out of the van to get some
drinks and food while I waited in the van, as I got to the club early for my
meeting. Ø The police that were
doing the stops came up to me, they told me they wanted to do some checks on
the van I was sitting in, I asked why, and they told me under the road
traffic act. Ø I then passed the
police my insurance policy for them to go over, the police officer also asked
me why I had stopped there. Ø I explained to him I
had a meeting in the night club that we were outside, as it was due to open
to the public in 1-month time to secure my future position there. Ø While I was there, I
was also planning on asking if there were any painting jobs, I explained all
this to the police officer I was talking to. Ø The police looked
inside the van and clearly saw it was empty and that there were also no signs
on the van showing it to be a company van. Ø But the police officer
was still unhappy. Ø He talked to yourselves
as the insurance company on the phone and was told I was not insured, at what
point I called you myself as my insurance company as I knew I was insured. Ø I explained the
situation to yourselves to be told I was covered for commuting to work,
social and domestic, as well as motor trade, but not for carriage of goods
for a company, which did not matter as my van was empty and still is whilst
being in the police impound. Ø I am putting in a complaint
to the independent complaints commission in regard to the unlawful seizure of
my vehicle. Ø Further to this would
it please be possible to find out the status of my insurance policy and the
reasons as to why I have been told you are in the process of closing my
policy. Yours
sincerely Mr
Simon Cordell 3 Telephone Recording of
Insurance Company! Caller Assistant: Thank you for calling KGM underwriting
department. Caller Assistant: All right. Police Officer: All I can do is comment on the paperwork that I
see in front of me. Caller Assistant: Right OK. Police Officer: And there was nothing left in the vehicle. Caller Assistant: Right at the time of when it comes in but
obviously, he had the opportunity to take items out of the vehicle. Police Officer: No because that would have been
registered that he had done and there is nothing there, when he had. Caller Assistant: So, it would have also been mentioned with
what was taken. Police Officer: yes, yes, on the seizer notice. Caller Assistant: OK, is there any chance that you could
forward me a copy of this please. Police Officer: No we are not allowed to under the police Act and
good knows what else, all that I can confirm is what I have seen on
the seizure notice. 4 1x Recording INFO ABOUT RECORDING 01m. 26_11_2013_Kelly Tiller Kelly call
to compound 26_ll_2013_ll_53_Kelly Tiller Kelly call to compound “Same as Above!” 1. Details of search of van: KGM recording. (FROM RECORDING 26_11_2013_11_53_Kelly Tiller Kelly call
to compound Thank
you for calling KGM …. introductions hold whilst we connect you to our
underwriters Charlton Car pound: Good afternoon James speaking James KMG: Hello James is Kelly there please.
Who’s calling please? Charlton
Car pound – Car pound Metropolitan police service James KMG: Yeah, one second please. Okay I
will just put you through Kelly
Tiller – Hello Kelly speaking Gareth: Hello Kelly my name is Gareth, Manager of Charlton Car Pound
Metropolitan Police Service I’m dealing with a Mr Simon Paul Cordell
something about the tools in the back of his vehicle Kelly: Correct yeah Gareth: All I can do is I’ve looked at the seizure notice which would be given
to Paul at the time and any property left was blank so if there were any
tools in the back normally that would be registered as tools in the rear of
the vehicle Kelly: Right okay because we had a call from the police Gareth: Yeah Kelly: He advised that there were tools in the vehicle Gareth: Do you want to speak to him a moment Kelly: Who Sorry Gareth: Paul because I have got him in front of me Kelly: Yeah, that’s fine SC: Hello Kelly: Hello SC: You alright Kelly Kelly: Okay what have they given you there SC: They have not given me anything but he did explain to you on the phone
that there’s’ no tools on the vehicle on their CADs and in any case, they
would write that down tools in the vehicle and so forth Kelly: Right okay and has he gives you a printout of this. SC: No, you will have to ask him yourself Kelly: Right can you pass me back to him Gareth: Hello Kelly Kelly: Hello, right okay so if there was any kind of tools in the vehicle it
would be stated on there Gareth: Well yeah what happens on the roadside a police officer will issue a
seizure notice and he will say do you want to take any property out of the
vehicle, normally they take sat nav’s, wallets, money whatever Kelly: He could have taken the tools out of the vehicle Gareth: Well, I do not know I am not going to comment on that to be perfectly
frank with you all I can do is comment on the paperwork that I see in front
of me Right
okay Gareth: And there was nothing left in the vehicle Kelly: At the time of when it come in but obviously Yeah Kelly: He’s had the opportunity to take items out of that vehicle Gareth: But then it would have been mentioned that he had done that and there
is nothing there saying that he had, and it would have also mentioned what
was taken on
the seizure notice yeah Kelly: Is there any chance you can forward me a copy of this Gareth: No, we are not allowed to under the Police Act and God knows what
else. All I can confirm is what I have
seen on the seizure notice Kelly: Can you confirm that in an email to me please Gareth: Right, what you do Kelly: I have already emailed yourselves and Right You’ve
replied to say you would not have anything like that on record and I just
need you to pop me over an email to say that Gareth: If you go to Charlton car Charlton documents and I can reply from
there because we have firewalls and God knows what else Kelly: So, you don’t use the vcse one of whatever it is called Gareth: No if you do charltondocuments@met.police.uk. What I am going to do I am
going to bring up a copy of this seizure notice just double check that I have
done everything right for you Kelly: Are you a police officer Gareth: No, I work at the compound I am just one of the little plebs Kelly: I have just forwarded you over a copy of the email and the reply that
I got from the vres Charlton@met.pnn.police.co.uk Gareth: What I will do I can only go on what we have got here and I’m just
bringing it up now if you bear with me.
I am looking at the copy of Kelly: Is that from a PC Geoghan Gareth: Bear with me at the end of the day it is just a signature Kelly: Oh, alright okay Gareth: All I can say is property left in the vehicle there is nothing in
there Property
removed from driver that is blank as well but obviously he did not remove
anything else as that would have been registered Kelly: Yeah Gareth: He would have told the officer there’s tools in there be careful as
they’re part of me trade Kelly: Yeah Gareth: Then that would have been registered they were within there. We take them out and put them into our
property store for safe-keeping and then when he comes to collect them, they
get given back then Kelly: Right okay that fine it is just when we got a call from the officer
when he has Mr Cordell at the roadside, he has advised us that he is carrying
tools in his vehicle Gareth: Well, I can’t comment on that I can only go on the information on that
seizure notice and there was nothing been entered that the gentleman removed
anything or there was anything left.
That’s all I can say Kelly: That’s fine no worries so if you can just reply to my email there and
then that will be great. Thanks for
your help. Email
from Kelly Tiller to compound. Case
Number: 011401009802 REQUEST
FROM MAGISTRATES COURT VIA EMAIL Summons’s
reply sent in by email on 22nd May 2014 at 14.19 hours with not guilty
plea attached Receipt
from 23rd May 2014 GL-SWESTERNMCENQ [smglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Phone
call from Simon’s mother who confirmed receipt of the email. Convicted
in absence on Application
to re-open case email sent on 11th September 2014 Email
acknowledged from the court to |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
16/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
17/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 130. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell / Page
Numbers: 282,283 Brixton Case! Broadsure Insurance! 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 131. Lorraine Cordell _FW_ RE_ Simon Cordell _
(1) / Page
Numbers: 284,285 Brixton Case! Broadsure Insurance! |
18/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 130. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 282,283 From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
18
November 2013 20:52 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject:
RE: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Ø Can you let me know by email if I am going to still have
insurance as from the27/11/2013 please? Ø I got a letter saying my insurance will be closed from
the 27/11/2013 and I cannot see the reason for this as I have done
nothing wrong. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Dear martin After a next call and talking to oily he asked me to send over the
receipt of me buying the van please see attached scan. I am waiting for the
new logbook to come from DVLA. Simon From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:07 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Martin Today the 15/11/2013 I made a call to be able to speak to you with regard to what happened
yesterday the 14/11/2013 with the police. I have talked to Oilly today and he asked me to write
this email to you as they are thinking of closing my insurance policy.
Yesterday I went for a meeting with the owner of a night club for a future
job position the meeting was set for 14.00 hours. I drove down for my meeting
and got there at around 13.00 hours there were some police at the roadside
doing stops on cars etc, as I drove pass and pulled over to park by the night
club, my friend who was with me got out of the van to get some drinks and
food while I waited in the van, as I got to the club early for my meeting.
The police that were doing the stops came up to me, they told me they wanted
to do some checks on the van I was sitting in, I asked why, and they told me
under the road traffic act. I then passed the police my insurance policy for
them to go over, the police officer also asked me why I had stopped there. I
explained to him I had a meeting in the night club that we were outside, as
it was due to open to the public in 1-month time to secure my future position
there. While I was there, I was also planning on asking if there were any
painting jobs, I explained all this to the police officer I was talking to.
The police looked inside the van and clearly saw it was empty and that there
were also no signs on the van showing it to be a company van. But the police
officer was still unhappy. He talked to yourselves as the insurance company
on the phone and was told I was not insured, at what point I called you
myself as my insurance company as I knew I was insured. I explained the
situation to yourselves to be told I was covered for commuting to work,
social and domestic, as well as motor trade, but not for carriage of goods
for a company, 283 which did not matter as my van was empty and still is whilst being in
the police impound. I am putting in a complaint to the independent complaints
commission in regard to the unlawful seizure of my vehicle. Further to this
would it please be possible to find out the status of my insurance policy and
the reasons as to why I have been told you are in the process of closing my
policy. Yours sincerely Mr. Simon
Cordell 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 131. Lorraine Cordell _FW_ RE_ Simon
Cordell _ (1) /
Page Numbers: 284,285, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 18 November 2013 20:53 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø
Can you let me know by email if
I am going to still have insurance as from the27/11/2013 please? Ø
I got a letter saying my insurance
will be closed from the 27/11/2013 and I cannot see the reason
for this as I have done nothing wrong. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Dear martin After a next call and talking to oily he asked me to send over the
receipt of me buying the van please see attached scan. I am waiting for the
new logbook to come from DVLA. Simon From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:07 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Martin Today the 15/11/2013 I made a call to be able to speak to you with regard to what happened
yesterday the 14/11/2013 with the police. I have talked to Oilly today and he asked me to write
this email to you as they are thinking of closing my insurance policy.
Yesterday I went for a meeting with the owner of a night club for a future
job position the meeting was set for 14.00 hours. I drove down for my meeting
and got there at around 13.00 hours there were some police at the roadside
doing stops on cars etc, as I drove pass and pulled over to park by the night
club, my friend who was with me got out of the van to get some drinks and
food while I waited in the van, as I got to the club early for my meeting.
The police that were doing the stops came up to me, they told me they wanted
to do some checks on the van I was sitting in, I asked why, and they told me
under the road traffic act. I then passed the police my insurance policy for
them to go over, the police officer also asked me why I had stopped there. I
explained to him I had a meeting in the night club that we were outside, as
it was due to open to the public in 1-month time to secure my future position
there. While I was there, I was also planning on asking if there were any
painting jobs, I explained all this to the police officer I was talking to. The
police looked inside the van and clearly saw it was empty and that there were
also no signs on the van showing it to be a company van. But the police
officer was still unhappy. He talked to yourselves as the insurance company
on the phone and was told I was not insured, at what point I called you
myself as my insurance company as I knew I was insured. I explained the
situation to yourselves to be told I was covered for commuting to work,
social and domestic, as well as motor trade, but not for carriage of goods
for a company, 285, which did not matter as my van was empty and still is whilst being in
the police impound. I am putting in a complaint to the independent complaints
commission in regard to the unlawful seizure of my vehicle. Further to this
would it please be possible to find out the status of my insurance policy and
the reasons as to why I have been told you are in the process of closing my
policy. Yours sincerely Mr Simon Cordell |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
19/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
20/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
21/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Equalling to the
Loss of Night club Job Due to the Police! 1. 6 Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_11.22.2013_RE RE Simon
Cordell _001 22/11/2013 / Page Numbers: 33,34,35,36,37,38,39 1 1.
Night club Email! - Equalling to the Loss of Night club Job Due to the
Police! Brixton
Case / Met Police! Broadsure
Insurance! 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 132. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell _ (1) / Page Numbers: 286,287 Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance! 3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 133. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell _ (2) / Page Numbers: 288,289,290 Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance! 4 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 134. Martin Jenkin _RE_
[1] RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 291,292,293 Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance! 5 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 135. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ [1] RE_ Simon Cordell / Page
Numbers: 294,295,296 Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance! 6 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 136.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ CX52 - JRZ / Page Numbers: 297 Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance! 7 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 137.
Lorraine Cordell _FW_ RE_ CX52JRZ / Page Numbers: 298 Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
22/11/2013 |
14:24:00 |
X7 33,34,35,36 37,38,39, |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
6. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 6 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_11.22.2013_RE RE Simon
Cordell _001 22/11/2013 / Page Numbers: 33,34,35,36 37,38,39 -- 33, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 22 November 2013
14:24 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: RE: Simon
Cordell Attachments: Police-Meno.pdf. Police
complaint.doc. CX52JRZ-Mid-database.png Hello Martin Ø
After the call you made
today and talked to myself Miss Lorraine Cordell, I am sending over the
information you asked for. Ø
I do feel also that
KMG asking to speak to the police office is in breach of my data protection,
but I will be willing to write and allow them to do this. Ø
As I said to KMG
yesterday on a phone that was made to them when I talked to Kelly Tilley, I
have not been found guilty at a court of law for not having no insurance and
it is for a court of law to find me guilty not a police officer who thinks I
done something when I have not. Ø
Even if KGM does
speak to the police office he will still say what he feels and that is not a
fact that I am guilty of anything. Ø
To be found guilty
it would have to be done in front of a judge. Ø
Also, Martin as you
said on the phone today when you in fact talked to the police on that day not
once did, they say I had anything in my van that would void my insurance, and
in fact I believe at this stage if the police did in fact have proof, they
would have said to you that my van was full of things which is not the case. Ø
I would like to also
know if my insurance is going to carry on while this matter is addressed or
if it will be closed down on the 27/11/2013 as the letter says that
KGM have sent me. Ø
And if KMG is going
to close down my policy I would like full written conditions of what part of
my policy I have broken. Ø
As for the letter of
complain that will be going to the police Simon still has not fully read over
it to make sure there is no errors or anything else that needs adding but it
does go into details as to what went on, it is only for use by yourself and
KGM to read only. Ø
Also, as I said on
the phone to you today the police are also telling me that the 3 times that my vehicles were seized and I had to
pay for them to be taken out of the compound, I will
need to claim this back from my insurance company as they had not done
their job and put them on the database so they are at fault not the police. Ø
You said to me today
that KGM are looking into this as they are on the database and it should show
up to the police that I am in fact insured. Ø
This has not been
the case for me and I have suffered badly due to this and this is the reason
I have to carry my insurance policy at all times so when I get pulled over by
the police, I can show them my documents, as the police say it does not show
up as I am insured, this is also the reason the insurance company have had so
many calls from the police to asked if I am insured or not since my policy
started. Ø
Could you please
send me proof that the vehicles where on the database so I can put the claim in to the police to get my money back for the
times my vehicles were seized. Ø
As at this stage I
do not want to have to put a freedom of information act into yourselves or
the police to the number of times that the police have in fact had to call my
insurance company to see if I was insured due to the police saying I was not
insured. Ø
I have always been
very happy with Broadsure Direct that is why I have still use them and would
like my insurance to carry on under them. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø
Can you let me know by email if
I am going to still have insurance as from the27/11/2013 please? Ø
I got a letter saying my
insurance will be closed from the 27/11/2013 and I cannot see the reason
for this as I have done nothing wrong. Many Thanks Simon Cordell 34, From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Dear martin Ø After a next call and talking
to oily he asked me to send over the receipt of me buying the van please see
attached scan. Ø I am waiting for the
new logbook to come from DVLA. Simon From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 15 November 2013 13:07 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Martin Ø Today the 15/11/13
I made a call to be able to speak to you with regard to what happened
yesterday the 14/11/2013 with the police. Ø I have talked to Oilly today
and he asked me to write this email to you as they are thinking of closing my
insurance policy. Ø Yesterday I went for a
meeting with the owner of a night club for a future job position the meeting
was set for 14.00 hours. Ø I drove down for my
meeting and got there at around 13.00 hours there were some police at the
roadside doing stops on cars etc, as I drove pass and pulled over to park by
the night club, my friend who was with me got out of the van to get some
drinks and food while I waited in the van, as I got to the club early for my
meeting. Ø The police that were
doing the stops came up to me, they told me they wanted to do some checks on
the van I was sitting in, I asked why, and they told me under the road
traffic act. Ø I then passed the
police my insurance policy for them to go over, the police officer also asked
me why I had stopped there. Ø I explained to him I
had a meeting in the night club that we were outside, as it was due to open
to the public in 1-month time to secure my future position there. Ø While I was there, I
was also planning on asking if there were any painting jobs, I explained all
this to the police officer I was talking to. Ø The police looked
inside the van and clearly saw it was empty and that there were also no signs
on the van showing it to be a company van. Ø But the police officer
was still unhappy. Ø He talked to yourselves
as the insurance company on the phone and was told I was not insured, at what
point I called you myself as my insurance company as I knew I was insured. Ø I explained the
situation to yourselves to be told I was covered for commuting to work,
social and domestic, as well as motor trade, but not for carriage of goods
for a company, which did not matter as my van was empty and still is whilst
being in the police impound. Ø I am putting in a
complaint to the independent complaints commission in regard to the unlawful
seizure of my vehicle. Ø Further to this would
it please be possible to find out the status of my insurance policy and the
reasons as to why I have been told you are in the process of closing my
policy. Yours sincerely Mr Simon Cordell 35,
End of Picture! 36, RE: RE: Simon Cordell
->Police complaint.doc Ø I am writing this
complaint about the 14/10/2013 when I was going to a meeting with an owner of
a night club for a future job position the meeting was set for 14.00 hours at
Brixton Hill SW2 1QZ. Ø When I got to
Brixton Hill SW2 1QZ there were some police on the roadside doing some stops
of cars etc, Ø I drove pass them
and parked up just in front of them. Ø My friend who was with
me got out of my van and went to buy some drinks and food while I waited in
the van. Ø Then next thing a police
officer come to my van and said to me he waited to do some checks on my van I
asked him the reason for this the police officer replied under the road
traffic act he also asked me the reason why I had stopped there as I was
passing him my insurance documents. Ø I explained to him
I had a meeting in the night club that we were outside, as it was due to open
to the public in 1-month time to secure my future position there. Ø While I was there,
I was also planning on asking if there were any painting jobs, I explained
all this to the police officer I was talking to. Ø The police officer
made a call to my insurance company and he then replied to me they are saying
that I was not insured, at this I was very shocked and started to make a call
to my Mother to ask her to call my insurance company to speak about why they
were saying I was not insurance. Ø She is fact talked
to a person called Martin who took Simons Number and said he would call him. Ø Martin did call and
I explained to him what was going on and he told me I was insured and also
talked to the police office and told him that I was insured. Ø The police talked
on the phone more than once and was told I was in fact insured to drive my
van. Ø The police officer
was still not happy and now told me that I was using my Van for work which I
told him that was not the case and that I was here for a meeting, I told the
police officer to look in my van and see if there were any working tools
inside it. Ø The police officer
saw this was not the case as the van was empty. Ø By this time a next
police officer had come to the other police officer and I started to talk to
him I explained what was going on and what the other officer was saying that
I was using my Van to work in, which was not the case and I told him also to
look in the van and see if there were any working tools in there. Ø I even showed him a
business card I had got made up to give out to people in the hope of work. Ø Which the police
officer put in his own wallet to keep for himself. Ø At this the other
officer overheard me and the other officer talking about the business card
and then used this to say that I had in fact been working and this is why he
was going to seize my van. Ø I told him that
where is the print bushes and print in my van as this is what was on the business
card it was a printer’s business card. Ø The officer then
said why have you got paint of your jeans I told him that I did not have
money to buy new jeans and that was why I was looking for work to try and
better myself. Ø I also told the
office to go into the property where I was due to go for a meeting and ask
them if I was working there. Ø He refused to do
this. Ø I still feel as if
there is a big issue here, I am allowed to drive to a meeting and park there
as long as I am not carrying goods for a company which I was not and that
could clearly be seen my van was empty so how anyone can think I am doing
anything wrong is beyond me. Ø The police officer
did not want to hear anything I had to say and was looking for any reason
from the start to arrest me or seize my van this was his aim from the start. Ø It did not matter
that the insurance company told him I was insured, the only thing I would not
be insured for were if I was to use my van as a tool for carriage of goods
for any company which was clearly not the case as my van was empty. 37, Ø I am insured to go
back and forward to any place of work as my insurance covers for social
domestic and pleasure and commuting as well as motor trade. Ø The police officer for
some reason would not hear I was insured and just at this time wanted to
seize my Van. Ø He was asking me to
sign a ticket in order to give me 6 points on my licence and a £300 fine and
for my van to be seized. Ø Which I did
understand what he was asking me to do as this has not happened to me only
this time but a further 2 times when the police on a Sunday on both other
times seized my vehicles due to them not being able to call my insurance
company. Ø And it is showing
on the database I was not insured. Ø I refused to sign
as I knew I was insured. Ø I told the police
officer to arrest me and that we could get this sorted at the police station,
due to me refusing to sign the ticket the police officer arrested me as I
asked him to do. Ø All this time I was
on the phone to my mother and she heard all of what was going on. Ø PC Smith spoke to
my mum also on the phone two times as well, my mother also asked PC smith was
there anything in my Van and PC Smith told her not that the van was empty. Ø My mother also
called the insurance company and talked to them they also told her I was
insured, and they could not understand why the police was doing this. Ø I was taken to
Southwark police station they were still trying to force me to sign the
ticket which I did not want to do, they told me if I did not sign then they
would not bail me and take me to court the next morning, I told them to do
this I was willing to stay in the police cells till the next day when this
could be heard by a judge as I knew I was not in the wrong, they changed
their mind and told this would not happen and they wanted me out of the
police station. Ø They forced me to
sign the ticket and then made me leave the police station, Ø While waiting
outside by reception in the police station I asked to speak to an inspector
the police officer who had come to drive me out of Southwark told me if I did
not leave with them now then I would have to make my own way or I would break
my bail conditions of not being in Southwark, I was on the phone to my mum
and she told me she was going to get off the phone and call my solicitors,
which she did, my solicitors told my mum to tell me to wait and talk to an
inspector and that due to the police taking me to Southwark I would not be
breaking my bail conditions as the police had taken me there. Ø I waited to see an
inspector and talked to him, he said due to the police being from Brixton
there was very little he could do, but he would get an inspector from Brixton
to call me so I could put in my complaint in, this has not happened and this
is the reason I am writing my complaint to yourselves. Ø I had to make my
way home with no money each time getting to the stop on the train I needed to
change telling the train officer what had happened if it was not for the
fact, they let me get back without paying I would have had to walk all the
way home as the police officer would not let me get my things out of the van
or my money. Ø I went to pick my
van up and again there was a cost to myself of £190, I will be taking this to
court as I should have had no need to have 6 points put on my licence and a
£300 fine when I did in fact have insurance to drive. Ø Due to also the
police officer lying to my insurance saying I was working and carrying goods
in my van which is clearly a lie as the van was empty, I have also had a
letter saying they are closing my insurance over, so I am having to deal with
this also. Ø I do not feel the
police officer who dealt with this matter address it as he should have, I
feel he did not do his job correctly and I have suffered due to this. Ø My insurance
company are saying that the data for my vehicles are on the data base and are
looking into the reason why it is not showing up when the police are doing
their checks. 38, Yours sincerely Mr
Simon Cordell 39,
End of Picture! 1 Night club Email! Equaling to the Loss of Night club Job Due to the
Police! Date:
Friday, 22 November 2013, 18:32 Subject: RE: white’s
venue From: Rewired re_wired@ymail.com To: Ø Hello Mr. Below are the domains I have ordered Ø www.whitesandsvenue.co.uk
Ø 07/10/2015 Ø White
sands venue.com Ø 07/10/2015 Ø The renewal dates
for both domains are 07/10/2015 they
were ordered with the Go Daddy Europe Limited and the cost was £22.15. Ø I have also started
a Facebook account Whites Function Hall the URL is https://www.facebook.com Ø White Sands. Ø The login information
for the Facebook account is whitesandvenue@yahoo.co.uk Ø wxx1. Ø The yahoo mail
account pass is whitesandvenue@yahoo.co.uk Ø W xxx Ø We are also going to
have to have a meeting about making a full website, so that the White Sands
Function Hall will have its own website, as I already said, I myself have a
number of accounts that I hold a number of people in them that have
birthdays, etc. that I would like to market towards the White Sands Function
Hall. Please see below picture of just one of my accounts for just Dec 2013 Ø Birthdays. Ø You can also look at
my own Website which is still having work done to it before I fully release
it to the public at http://toosmooth.co.uk Ø I will forward you
the details of the pricing for the flooring and virgin media tomorrow. Simon. 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 132. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell _ (1) /
Page Numbers: 286,287, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 November 2013 14:24 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: RE: Simon Cordell Attachments: Police Meno.pdf; Police complaint.doc; CX52JRZMiddatabase.png Hello Martin Ø After the call you made
today and talked to myself Miss Lorraine Cordell, I am sending over the
information you asked for. Ø I do feel also that KMG
asking to speak to the police office is in breach of my data protection, but
I will be willing to write and allow them to do this. Ø As I said to KMG
yesterday on a phone that was made to them when I talked to Kelly Tilley, I
have not been found guilty at a court of law for not having no insurance and
it is for a court of law to find me guilty not a police officer who thinks I
done something when I have not. Ø Even if KGM does speak
to the police office he will still say what he feels and that is not a fact
that I am guilty of anything. Ø To be found guilty it
would have to be done in front of a judge. Ø Also, Martin as you
said on the phone today when you in fact talked to the police on that day not
once did, they say I had anything in my van that would void my insurance, and
in fact I believe at this stage if the police did in fact have proof, they
would have said to you that my van was full of things which is not the case. Ø I would like to also
know if my insurance is going to carry on while this matter is addressed or
if it will be closed down on the 27/11/2013 as the letter says that
KGM have sent me. Ø And if KMG is going to
close down my policy I would like full written conditions of what part of my
policy I have broken. Ø As for the letter of
complain that will be going to the police Simon still has not fully read over
it to make sure there is no errors or anything else that needs adding but it
does go into details as to what went on, it is only for use by yourself and
KGM to read only. Ø Also, as I said on the
phone to you today the police are also telling me that the 3 times that my vehicles were seized and I had to
pay for them to be taken out of the compound, I will
need to claim this back from my insurance company as they had not done
their job and put them on the database so they are at fault not the police. Ø You said to me today
that KGM are looking into this as they are on the database and it should show
up to the police that I am in fact insured. Ø This has not been the
case for me and I have suffered badly due to this and this is the reason I
have to carry my insurance policy at all times so when I get pulled over by
the police, I can show them my documents, as the police say it does not show
up as I am insured, this is also the reason the insurance company have had so
many calls from the police to asked if I am insured or not since my policy
started. Ø Could you please send
me proof that the vehicles where on the database so
I can put the claim in to the police to get my money back for the times my
vehicles were seized. Ø As at this stage I do
not want to have to put a freedom of information act into yourselves or the
police to the number of times that the police have in fact had to call my
insurance company to see if I was insured due to the police saying I was not
insured. Ø I have always been very
happy with Broadsure Direct that is why I have still use them and would like
my insurance to carry on under them. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Can you let me know by email if I am going to still have insurance as
from the? 27/11/2013 please, I got a letter saying my insurance will be closed from the 27/11/2013 and I cannot see the reason for this as I have done nothing wrong. Many Thanks 287, Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Dear martin After a next call and talking to oily he asked me to send over the
receipt of me buying the van please see attached scan. I am waiting for the
new logbook to come from DVLA. Simon From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:07 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Martin Ø Today the 15/11/13
I made a call to be able to speak to you with regard to what happened
yesterday the 14/11/2013 with the police. Ø I have talked to Oilly
today and he asked me to write this email to you as they are thinking of
closing my insurance policy. Ø Yesterday I went for a
meeting with the owner of a night club for a future job position the meeting
was set for 14.00 hours. Ø I drove down for my
meeting and got there at around 13.00 hours there were some police at the
roadside doing stops on cars etc, as I drove pass and pulled over to park by
the night club, my friend who was with me got out of the van to get some
drinks and food while I waited in the van, as I got to the club early for my
meeting. Ø The police that were
doing the stops came up to me, they told me they wanted to do some checks on
the van I was sitting in, I asked why, and they told me under the road
traffic act. Ø I then passed the
police my insurance policy for them to go over, the police officer also asked
me why I had stopped there. Ø I explained to him I
had a meeting in the night club that we were outside, as it was due to open
to the public in 1-month time to secure my future position there. Ø While I was there, I
was also planning on asking if there were any painting jobs, I explained all
this to the police officer I was talking to. Ø The police looked inside
the van and clearly saw it was empty and that there were also no signs on the
van showing it to be a company van. Ø But the police officer
was still unhappy. Ø He talked to yourselves
as the insurance company on the phone and was told I was not insured, at what
point I called you myself as my insurance company as I knew I was insured. Ø I explained the
situation to yourselves to be told I was covered for commuting to work,
social and domestic, as well as motor trade, but not for carriage of goods
for a company, which did not matter as my van was empty and still is whilst
being in the police impound. Ø I am putting in a
complaint to the independent complaints commission in regard to the unlawful
seizure of my vehicle. Ø Further to this would
it please be possible to find out the status of my insurance policy and the
reasons as to why I have been told you are in the process of closing my
policy. Yours sincerely Mr Simon Cordell 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 133. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell _ (2) / Page Numbers: 288,289,290, From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
22
November 2013 15:15 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject:
RE: RE: Simon
Cordell Hello Martin Ø I made a mistake on the date that KGM said they were going
to close my insurance policy it’s the 23/11/2013 Ø So, I will need to know today if I will still be insured
as from 23/11/2013 until this matter is sorted. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 November 2013 14:24 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin Ø After the call you made
today and talked to myself Miss Lorraine Cordell, I am sending over the
information you asked for. Ø I do feel also that KMG
asking to speak to the police office is in breach of my data protection, but
I will be willing to write and allow them to do this. Ø As I said to KMG
yesterday on a phone that was made to them when I talked to Kelly Tilley, I
have not been found guilty at a court of law for not having no insurance and
it is for a court of law to find me guilty not a police officer who thinks I
done something when I have not. Ø Even if KGM does speak
to the police office he will still say what he feels and that is not a fact
that I am guilty of anything. Ø To be found guilty it
would have to be done in front of a judge. Ø Also, Martin as you said
on the phone today when you in fact talked to the police on that day not once
did, they say I had anything in my van that would void my insurance, and in
fact I believe at this stage if the police did in fact have proof, they would
have said to you that my van was full of things which is not the case. Ø I would like to also
know if my insurance is going to carry on while this matter is addressed or
if it will be closed down on the 27/11/2013 as the letter says that
KGM have sent me. Ø And if KMG is going to close
down my policy I would like full written conditions of what part of my policy
I have broken. Ø As for the letter of
complain that will be going to the police Simon still has not fully read over
it to make sure there is no errors or anything else that needs adding but it
does go into details as to what went on, it is only for use by yourself and
KGM to read only. Ø Also, as I said on the
phone to you today the police are also telling me that the 3 times that my vehicles were seized and I had to
pay for them to be taken out of the compound, I will
need to claim this back from my insurance company as they had not done
their job and put them on the database so they are at fault not the police. Ø You said to me today
that KGM are looking into this as they are on the database and it should show
up to the police that I am in fact insured. Ø This has not been the
case for me and I have suffered badly due to this and this is the reason I
have to carry my insurance policy at all times so when I get pulled over by
the police, I can show them my documents, as the police say it does not show
up as I am insured, this is also the reason the insurance company have had so
many calls from the police to asked if I am insured or not since my policy
started. Ø Could you please send me
proof that the vehicles where on the database so I
can put the claim in to the police to get my money back for the times my
vehicles were seized. Ø As at this stage I do
not want to have to put a freedom of information act into yourselves or the
police to the number of times that the police have in fact had to call my
insurance company to see if I was insured due to the police saying I was not
insured. Ø I have always been very
happy with Broadsure Direct that is why I have still use them and would like
my insurance to carry on under them. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell 289, Hi Martin Ø
Can you let me know by email if
I am going to still have insurance as from the 27/11/2013 Ø
please, Ø
I got a letter saying my
insurance will be closed from the 27/11/2013, and I cannot see the
reason for this as I have done nothing wrong. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Dear martin Ø
After a next call and talking
to oily he asked me to send over the receipt of me buying the van please see
attached scan. I am waiting for the new logbook to come from DVLA. Simon From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:07 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Martin Ø Today the 15/11/13
I made a call to be able to speak to you with regard to what happened
yesterday the 14/11/2013 with the police. Ø I have talked to Oilly
today and he asked me to write this email to you as they are thinking of
closing my insurance policy. Ø Yesterday I went for a
meeting with the owner of a night club for a future job position the meeting
was set for 14.00 hours. Ø I drove down for my
meeting and got there at around 13.00 hours there were some police at the
roadside doing stops on cars etc, as I drove pass and pulled over to park by
the night club, my friend who was with me got out of the van to get some
drinks and food while I waited in the van, as I got to the club early for my
meeting. Ø The police that were
doing the stops came up to me, they told me they wanted to do some checks on
the van I was sitting in, I asked why, and they told me under the road
traffic act. Ø I then passed the
police my insurance policy for them to go over, the police officer also asked
me why I had stopped there. Ø I explained to him I
had a meeting in the night club that we were outside, as it was due to open
to the public in 1-month time to secure my future position there. Ø While I was there, I
was also planning on asking if there were any painting jobs, I explained all
this to the police officer I was talking to. Ø The police looked
inside the van and clearly saw it was empty and that there were also no signs
on the van showing it to be a company van. Ø But the police officer
was still unhappy. Ø He talked to yourselves
as the insurance company on the phone and was told I was not insured, at what
point I called you myself as my insurance company as I knew I was insured. Ø I explained the
situation to yourselves to be told I was covered for commuting to work,
social and domestic, as well as motor trade, but not for carriage of goods
for a company, which did not matter as my van was empty and still is whilst
being in the police impound. Ø I am putting in a
complaint to the independent complaints commission in regard to the unlawful
seizure of my vehicle. Ø Further to this would
it please be possible to find out the status of my insurance policy and the
reasons as to why I have been told you are in the process of closing my
policy. Yours sincerely Mr Simon Cordell 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 134. Martin Jenkin _RE_ [1]
RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 291,292,293, From:
Martin
Jenkin [martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent:
22
November 2013 15:50 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject:
RE: [1] RE: Simon Cordell Hi Lorraine, Ø Please find response from your insurers Ø I have listened to the call that took place between the
police and my colleague Jessica advising that Mr Simon Cordell was carrying
tools in his vehicle so unfortunately, we have no
other opportunity but to continue with the cancellation of the policy. Ø Unfortunately, the policy will cease as of tomorrow as
per the letter from KGM. Ø The only way to stop this is to either get the Police
officer to contact KGM or to get a signed statement from Ø him before 1700hrs today. Regards Martin From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 November 2013 15:15 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin Ø
I made a mistake on the date that
KGM said they were going to close my insurance policy it’s the 23/11/2013 Ø
So, I will need to know today
if I will still be insured as from 23/11/2013 until this matter is
sorted. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 November 2013 14:24 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin Ø After the call you made
today and talked to myself Miss Lorraine Cordell, I am sending over the
information you asked for. Ø I do feel also that KMG
asking to speak to the police office is in breach of my data protection, but
I will be willing to write and allow them to do this. Ø As I said to KMG
yesterday on a phone that was made to them when I talked to Kelly Tilley, I
have not been found guilty at a court of law for not having no insurance and
it is for a court of law to find me guilty not a police officer who thinks I
done something when I have not. Ø Even if KGM does speak
to the police office he will still say what he feels and that is not a fact
that I am guilty of anything. Ø To be found guilty it
would have to be done in front of a judge. Ø Also, Martin as you said
on the phone today when you in fact talked to the police on that day not once
did, they say I had anything in my van that would void my insurance, and in
fact I believe at this stage if the police did in fact have proof, they would
have said to you that my van was full of things which is not the case. Ø I would like to also
know if my insurance is going to carry on while this matter is addressed or
if it will be closed down on the 27/11/2013 as the letter says that
KGM have sent me. Ø And if KMG is going to close
down my policy I would like full written conditions of what part of my policy
I have broken. Ø As for the letter of
complain that will be going to the police Simon still has not fully read over
it to make sure there is no errors or anything else that needs adding but it
does go into details as to what went on, it is only for use by yourself and
KGM to read only. Ø Also, as I said on the
phone to you today the police are also telling me that the 3 times that my vehicles were seized and I had to
pay for them to be taken out of the compound, I will
need to claim this back from my insurance company as they had not done
their job and put them on the database so they are at fault not the 292, police. Ø You said to me today
that KGM are looking into this as they are on the database and it should show
up to the police that I am in fact insured. Ø This has not been the case
for me and I have suffered badly due to this and this is the reason I have to
carry my insurance policy at all times so when I get pulled over by the
police, I can show them my documents, as the police say it does not show up
as I am insured, this is also the reason the insurance company have had so
many calls from the police to asked if I am insured or not since my policy
started. Ø Could you please send
me proof that the vehicles where on the database so
I can put the claim in to the police to get my money back for the times my
vehicles were seized. Ø As at this stage I do
not want to have to put a freedom of information act into yourselves or the
police to the number of times that the police have in fact had to call my
insurance company to see if I was insured due to the police saying I was not
insured. Ø I have always been very
happy with Broadsure Direct that is why I have still use them and would like
my insurance to carry on under them. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø
Can you let me know by email if
I am going to still have insurance as from the 27/11/2013 Ø
please, Ø
I got a letter saying my
insurance will be closed from the 27/11/2013, and I cannot see the
reason for this as I have done nothing wrong. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Dear martin Ø
After a next call and talking
to oily he asked me to send over the receipt of me buying the van please see
attached scan. I am waiting for the new logbook to come from DVLA. Simon From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:07 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Martin Ø Today the 15/11/13
I made a call to be able to speak to you with regard to what happened
yesterday the 14/11/2013 with the police. Ø I have talked to Oilly today
and he asked me to write this email to you as they are thinking of closing my
insurance policy. Ø Yesterday I went for a
meeting with the owner of a night club for a future job position the meeting
was set for 14.00 hours. Ø I drove down for my
meeting and got there at around 13.00 hours there were some police at the
roadside doing stops on cars etc, as I drove pass and pulled over to park by
the night club, my friend who was with me got out of the van to get some
drinks and food while I waited in the van, as I got to the club early for my
meeting. Ø The police that were
doing the stops came up to me, they told me they wanted to do some checks on
the van I was sitting in, I asked why, and they told me under the road
traffic act. Ø I then passed the
police my insurance policy for them to go over, the police officer also asked
me why I had stopped there. Ø I explained to him I
had a meeting in the night club that we were outside, as it was due to open
to the public in 1-month time to secure my future position there. Ø While I was there, I
was also planning on asking if there were any painting jobs, I explained all
this to the police officer I was talking to. Ø The police looked
inside the van and clearly saw it was empty and that there were also no signs
on the van showing it to be a company van. Ø But the police officer
was still unhappy. Ø He talked to yourselves
as the insurance company on the phone and was told I was not insured, at what
point I called you myself as my insurance company as I knew I was insured. Ø I explained the
situation to yourselves to be told I was covered for commuting to work,
social and domestic, as well as motor trade, but not for carriage of goods
for a company, which did not matter as my van was empty and still is whilst
being in the police impound. Ø I am putting in a
complaint to the independent complaints commission in regard to the unlawful
seizure of my vehicle. Ø Further to this would
it please be possible to find out the status of my insurance policy and the
reasons as to why I have been told you are in the process of closing my
policy. Yours sincerely Mr Simon Cordell 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 135. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
[1] RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 294,295,296, From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
22
November 2013 16:50 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject:
RE: [1] RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin Ø Kelly from KGM has just called and said that they will
keep the cover till Monday at 12.00 for us to have time to get information
from the police that there was in fact no tools in the van. Ø Simon has already been on the phone to the police and
been told to contract the compound 6the van was taken to as they have to
check every vehicle that is taken there, Ø he is at this time on the phone to the compound in order
to try and get the information that KGM needs. Ø The Compound it was taken to is Charlton vehicle pound 8 Bramshot Avenue, Charlton, London, SE7 7HY Simon From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To:martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 22 November 2013 15:50 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: [1] RE: Simon Cordell Hi Lorraine, Ø Please find
response from your insurers Ø I have
listened to the call that took place between the police and my colleague
Jessica advising that Mr Simon Cordell was carrying tools in his vehicle so
unfortunately, we have no other opportunity but to continue with the
cancellation of the policy. Ø Unfortunately,
the policy will cease as of tomorrow as per the letter from KGM. Ø The only
way to stop this is to either get the Police officer to contact KGM or to get
a signed statement from Ø him before
1700hrs today. Regards Martin From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 November 2013 15:15 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin Ø
I made a mistake on the date
that KGM said they were going to close my insurance policy it’s the 23/11/2013 Ø
So, I will need to know today if
I will still be insured as from 23/11/2013 until this matter is
sorted. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 November 2013 14:24 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin 295, Ø After the call you made
today and talked to myself Miss Lorraine Cordell, I am sending over the
information you asked for. Ø I do feel also that KMG
asking to speak to the police office is in breach of my data protection, but
I will be willing to write and allow them to do this. Ø As I said to KMG
yesterday on a phone that was made to them when I talked to Kelly Tilley, I
have not been found guilty at a court of law for not having no insurance and
it is for a court of law to find me guilty not a police officer who thinks I
done something when I have not. Ø Even if KGM does speak
to the police office he will still say what he feels and that is not a fact
that I am guilty of anything. Ø To be found guilty it
would have to be done in front of a judge. Ø Also, Martin as you
said on the phone today when you in fact talked to the police on that day not
once did, they say I had anything in my van that would void my insurance, and
in fact I believe at this stage if the police did in fact have proof, they
would have said to you that my van was full of things which is not the case. Ø I would like to also
know if my insurance is going to carry on while this matter is addressed or
if it will be closed down on the 27/11/2013 as the letter says that
KGM have sent me. Ø And if KMG is going to
close down my policy I would like full written conditions of what part of my
policy I have broken. Ø As for the letter of
complain that will be going to the police Simon still has not fully read over
it to make sure there is no errors or anything else that needs adding but it
does go into details as to what went on, it is only for use by yourself and
KGM to read only. Ø Also, as I said on the
phone to you today the police are also telling me that the 3 times that my vehicles were seized and I had to
pay for them to be taken out of the compound, I will
need to claim this back from my insurance company as they had not done
their job and put them on the database so they are at fault not the police. Ø You said to me today
that KGM are looking into this as they are on the database and it should show
up to the police that I am in fact insured. Ø This has not been the
case for me and I have suffered badly due to this and this is the reason I
have to carry my insurance policy at all times so when I get pulled over by
the police, I can show them my documents, as the police say it does not show
up as I am insured, this is also the reason the insurance company have had so
many calls from the police to asked if I am insured or not since my policy
started. Ø Could you please send
me proof that the vehicles where on the database so
I can put the claim in to the police to get my money back for the times my
vehicles were seized. Ø As at this stage I do
not want to have to put a freedom of information act into yourselves or the
police to the number of times that the police have in fact had to call my
insurance company to see if I was insured due to the police saying I was not
insured. Ø I have always been very
happy with Broadsure Direct that is why I have still use them and would like
my insurance to carry on under them. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø
Can you let me know by email if
I am going to still have insurance as from the 27/11/2013 Ø
please, Ø
I got a letter saying my
insurance will be closed from the 27/11/2013, and I cannot see the
reason for this as I have done nothing wrong. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Dear martin 296, Ø
After a next call and talking
to oily he asked me to send over the receipt of me buying the van please see
attached scan. I am waiting for the new logbook to come from DVLA. Simon From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 November 2013 13:07 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Martin Ø Today the 15/11/13
I made a call to be able to speak to you with regard to what happened
yesterday the 14/11/2013 with the police. Ø I have talked to Oilly
today and he asked me to write this email to you as they are thinking of
closing my insurance policy. Ø Yesterday I went for a
meeting with the owner of a night club for a future job position the meeting
was set for 14.00 hours. Ø I drove down for my
meeting and got there at around 13.00 hours there were some police at the
roadside doing stops on cars etc, as I drove pass and pulled over to park by
the night club, my friend who was with me got out of the van to get some
drinks and food while I waited in the van, as I got to the club early for my
meeting. Ø The police that were
doing the stops came up to me, they told me they wanted to do some checks on
the van I was sitting in, I asked why, and they told me under the road
traffic act. Ø I then passed the
police my insurance policy for them to go over, the police officer also asked
me why I had stopped there. Ø I explained to him I
had a meeting in the night club that we were outside, as it was due to open
to the public in 1-month time to secure my future position there. Ø While I was there, I
was also planning on asking if there were any painting jobs, I explained all this
to the police officer I was talking to. Ø The police looked
inside the van and clearly saw it was empty and that there were also no signs
on the van showing it to be a company van. Ø But the police officer
was still unhappy. Ø He talked to yourselves
as the insurance company on the phone and was told I was not insured, at what
point I called you myself as my insurance company as I knew I was insured. Ø I explained the
situation to yourselves to be told I was covered for commuting to work,
social and domestic, as well as motor trade, but not for carriage of goods
for a company, which did not matter as my van was empty and still is whilst
being in the police impound. Ø I am putting in a
complaint to the independent complaints commission in regard to the unlawful
seizure of my vehicle. Ø Further to this would
it please be possible to find out the status of my insurance policy and the
reasons as to why I have been told you are in the process of closing my
policy. Yours sincerely Mr Simon Cordell 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 136.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ CX52JRZ / Page Numbers: 297 From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
22
November 2013 17:14 To: 'vrescharlton@met.police.uk' Subject:
RE: CX52JRZ To Whom It May Concern: Ø I am writing this email after calling the police and
being told to contract yourselves about a matter I am trying to sort out. My
Van reg CX52 JRZ was impounded to Charlton Car Pound, 8 Bramshot Avenue,
London, SE7 7HY on the 14/11/2013 tickets No: 01/ J63181495 Ø I have been told by the police when I called them that
each vehicle that is impounded you do a check on to list what items are in
there. Ø I would like to know how I can go about getting a list
of items that was in my van reg CX52 JRZ as I need this list to give it to my
insurance company. Ø Or if my insurance company emails you can you give them
a list. Many Thanks Simon Cordell 7 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 137. Lorraine Cordell _FW_
RE_ CX52JRZ / Page Numbers: 298, From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
22
November 2013 17:20 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject:
FW: RE: CX52JRZ Hello Martin Ø Please see the below email that I have been told by the
police to contract Charlton Car Pound as when any vehicle is impounded, they
do a check and list all the items in the vehicle. Ø I am hoping to get a reply to my email on how to go
about getting the list shortly. Simon From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 November 2013 17:14 To: 'vrescharlton@met.police.uk' Subject: RE: CX52JRZ To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am writing this email after
calling the police and being told to contract yourselves about a matter I am
trying to sort out. My Van reg CX52 JRZ was impounded to Charlton Car Pound,
8 Bramshot Avenue, London, SE7 7HY on the 14/11/2013 tickets
No: 01/ J63181495 Ø
I have been told by the police when
I called them that each vehicle that is impounded you do a check on to list
what items are in there. Ø
I would like to know how I can
go about getting a list of items that was in my van reg CX52 JRZ as I need
this list to give it to my insurance company. Ø
Or if my insurance company
emails you can you give them a list. Many Thanks Simon Cordell |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
22/11/2013 Charlton Car Pound |
23/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
22/11/2013 Charlton Car Pound I do feel also that KMG asking
to speak to the police office is in breach of my data protection, but I will
be willing to write and allow them to do this. 22/11/2013 I have also been speaking to
Sally Browne, duty inspector at Lambeth police station, I spoken to her on
the and the 23/11/2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 138. Lorraine Cordell
_FW_ RE_ CX52JRZ (2) / Page Numbers: 299 Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
24/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 138. Lorraine Cordell _FW_ RE_ CX52JRZ (2) / Page Numbers: 299, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 24 November 2013 13:33 To: 'charltondocuments@met.police.uk' Subject: FW: RE: CX52JRZ Hello Ø Can anyone please tell me how I can deal with this issue
below Many
Thanks Simon
Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 November 2013 17:14 To: 'vrescharlton@met.police.uk' Subject: RE: CX52JRZ To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am writing this email after
calling the police and being told to contract yourselves about a matter I am
trying to sort out. My Van reg CX52 JRZ was impounded to Charlton Car Pound,
8 Bramshot Avenue, London, SE7 7HY on the 14/11/2013 tickets
No: 01/ J63181495 Ø
I have been told by the police
when I called them that each vehicle that is impounded you do a check on to
list what items are in there. Ø
I would like to know how I can
go about getting a list of items that was in my van reg CX52 JRZ as I need
this list to give it to my insurance company. Ø
Or if my insurance company
emails you can you give them a list. Many Thanks Simon
Cordell |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 139. Lorraine Cordell _FW_
RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 300,301,302 Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 140. Vicky Beale _FW_
REF_ 00-COSX14MT04-ID_42_ Urgent / Page
Numbers: 303,304 Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! 3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 141. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ REF_ 00-COSX14MT04-ID_42_ Urgent / Page
Numbers: 305,306 Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
25/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 139. Lorraine Cordell _FW_ RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 300,301,302, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 25 November 2013 10:06 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Hello
Martin Ø I have spent all weekend trying to get hold of the
Charlton Car Pound as that is where the police have said there will hold a
list of what was in the van. Ø The police have told me that the compound has to make a
list of every vehicle that is impounded so it covers them also so they will
have a list. Ø I have sent 2 emails over the weekend which I do know
they have read as I had tracking on them. Ø I have spoken to Kelly today and she has asked me to
make sure you have the information for the compound and can you pass it over
to her asap. Also, can you find out from Kelly Tiller if Simon will be
covered after 12.00 today while she gets hold of the compound please and let
us know as soon as possible. Ø Emails for the compound Ø charltondocuments@met.police.uk Address
and ticket number Charlton
Car Pound, 8 Bramshot Avenue, London,
SE7 7HY on
the 14/11/2013 tickets
No: 01/ J63181495 Charlton
Car Pound 0208284866 Ø I telephone number that I can find. Van Reg CX52JRZ and
the date was taken in was the 14/11/2013 Ø I have also been speaking to Sally Browne, duty
inspector at Lambeth police station, I spoken to her on the 22/11/2013 and the 23/11/2013 when has she called me
back? Ø I was told that due to this going to court the police
would not be able to talk to us and that they will not be back on duty till
the end of this week and they will be doing night shaft. Ø CAD 7548/22Nov13 Ø and also, CAD 10164/22Nov13 Ø these are the 2 CAD numbers for me asking to speak to
the inspector Silly Browne. Ø Please see the read receipts below for the emails I sent
over to the compound Your
message To: Austin PAUL R (DORCC SERV) Subject: RE: CX52JRZ Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 5:14:12 PM Ø (UTC) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London was read on Saturday, November 23, 2013 4:41:48 AM (UTC)
Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London. Total Policing is the Met's commitment to
be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime
and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make our
capital safer. Consider our environment please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary. NOTICE This
email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or
legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you
must not distribute or copy the 301, information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts
no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find
us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Your
message To: Guy Rob (DORCC SERV) Subject: FW: RE: CX52JRZ Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 1:32:58 PM Ø (UTC) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London was read on Sunday, November 24, 2013 5:01:36 PM (UTC)
Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London. Total Policing is the Met's commitment to
be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime
and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make our
capital safer. Consider our environment please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be
confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the
Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find
us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 24 November 2013 13:33 To: 'charltondocuments@met.police.uk' Subject: FW: RE: CX52JRZ Hello Ø
Can anyone please tell me how I
can deal with this issue below Many Thanks 302, Simon Cordell From: Lorraine
Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22
November 2013 17:14 To: 'vrescharlton@met.police.uk' Subject: RE: CX52JRZ To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am writing this email after
calling the police and being told to contract yourselves about a matter I am
trying to sort out. My Van reg CX52 JRZ was impounded to Charlton Car Pound,
8 Bramshot Avenue, London, SE7 7HY on the 14/11/2013 tickets
No: 01/ J63181495 Ø
I have been told by the police
when I called them that each vehicle that is impounded you do a check on to
list what items are in there. Ø
I would like to know how I can
go about getting a list of items that was in my van reg CX52 JRZ as I need
this list to give it to my insurance company. Ø
Or if my insurance company
emails you can you give them a list. Many Thanks Simon
Cordell 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 140. Vicky Beale _FW_ REF_ 00-COSX14MT04-ID_42_
Urgent / Page Numbers: 303,304 From:
Vicky Beale [vickybeale@broadsuredirect.com] Sent:
25 November 2013 16:10
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
FW: REF:
00-COSX14MT04-ID<42> Urgent Importance:
High Kind
Regards, Vicky
Beale “dd:
image001.png@01CC9F89.E” Administration Department t: 01843 594477 f:
01843 594488 Broadsure Direct – Telephone number: 01843 594477 – Fax Number: 01843 594488 This
e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the
person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and
confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must
not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as
possible and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve
the right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our network.
Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. -- From: Vicky Beale [Mail
To: vickybeale@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 25 November 2013 15:53 To: 'lorriane32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: REF: 00-COSX14MT04-ID<42> Urgent Importance: High Good
Afternoon, Ø Can you please ask Simon to contact me urgently? Ø as we need him to go to the compound and when he is
there to contact Kelly at KGM on 02085301811, Ø if he can't do this that we need a report form from the
compound and for him to contact 02071613500 Ø and request a subject access request of report. Kind
Regards, Vicky
Beale Administration Department t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 304 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure
Direct ‐ Telephone number: 01843
594477 ‐ Fax Number: 01843
594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This
e‐mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for
the person or organisation to whom it is addressed.
It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you are not the
intended recipient, you
must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this e‐mail in error, please
reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note
that we are able to, and reserve
the right to, monitor e‐mail communications passing through our network. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure
Direct Is Authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 141. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ REF_
00-COSX14MT04-ID_42_ Urgent / Page Numbers: 305,306 From:
Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
25 November 2013 17:12 To: 'Vicky Beale' Subject:
RE: REF:
00-COSX14MT04-ID<42> Urgent Hello
Vicky Beale Ø After the call I made to yourself about the email you
sent me Ø I will go to the compound in the morning Ø due to the time now Ø I would not get there, till very late due to the tariff Ø and by the time I got there I do not believe Kelly
Tiller would still be working Ø so, I will go in the morning Ø and when I get there, Ø I will call Kelly. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: Vicky Beale [Mail
To: vickybeale@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 25 November 2013 16:10 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: FW: REF: 00-COSX14MT04-ID<42> Urgent Importance:
High Kind
Regards, Vicky
Beale cid:
image001.png@01CC9F89.E Administration Department t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct - Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail
transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the person or
organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and
confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must
not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible
and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the
right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure
Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Vicky Beale [Mail
To: vickybeale@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 25 November 2013 15:53 To: 'lorriane32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: REF: 00-COSX14MT04-ID<42> Urgent Importance: High Ø Good Afternoon, 306, Sent: 25 November 2013 16:28 From: Tiller, Kelly Mail To: Kelly.Tiller@canopius.com To: VRES Mailbox – Charlton Subject: RE: Mr. Simon Cordell - CX52 Xxxx. Ø I got told by the police that you do a report on all
items that was in the vehicle at the time it was ceased. Ø Can I get a copy of this report please? Kind regards Kelly Tiller Fleet Underwriting | KGM Motor Insurance—Member
of the Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18
1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1818 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com Sent: 25 November 2013 16:26 From: Sarah.Williams6@met.pnn.police.uk Mail To: Sarah.Williams6@met.pnn.police.uk On Behalf Of VresCharlton@met.pnn.police.uk To: Tiller, Kelly Subject: RE: Mr Simon Cordell - CX52 Jxx Ø We got no record what was in the vehicle; we do not
touch the vehicle's contents. Regards, S. Williams. Sent: 25 November 2013 10:55 From: Tiller, Kelly. Mail To: Kelly.Tiller@canopius.com To: VRES Mailbox—Charlton Subject: Mr Simon Cordell - CX52 Xxxx. Ø Morning, I need some assistance with regards to the
above. Ø We insure, Mr Simon Cordell Ø and I need a copy of the report of the items that was in
his vehicle at the time it was ceased. Ø We are due to cancel his policy @ noon today. Ø Your urgent advises are awaited. Kind regards Kelly Tiller. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. 7 Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 7 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_11.26.2013_RE
Simon Cordell 26/11/2013 / Page Numbers: 40,41,42,43 1 ·
x1 Email Police Car Compound, / Loss of Insurance for the Van + collection
fees / Night club Job Due to the Police Loss of Insurance for the Van +
collection fees / Nightclub Job Due to the Police & Insurance Company Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 142.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 307 Brixton
Case / Met Police! Broadsure
Insurance! |
26/11/2013 |
15:46:00 |
X4 40,41,42 43 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
7. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 7 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_11.26.2013_RE Simon Cordell 26/11/2013 / Page Numbers: 40,41,42 43 -- 40, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 26 November 2013
15:46 To: Martin Jenkin Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Attachments: Data-Protection-KGM.doc;
Kelly-TiNer-KGM.doc Hello Martin, Ø Thank you for the
phone call today to tell me I was still insured. Ø Could you please
pass on the attached documents to Kelly Tiller at KGM one is a Subject access
request under the Data Protection Act 1998. Ø The other letter is
just to get Kelly Tiller to confirm by email I am in fact still insured so I
have this in writing and also to found out why my van is still not showing up
on the database. Ø And also, about the
logbooks which I am still waiting for them from DVLA I called DVLA today when
I got back from the compound and was told it can take 8 weeks for me to get
the new logbooks, I will therefore send then right over to you by email as
soon as I get them. Many Thanks Simon Cordell 41, RE: Simon
Cordell->Data-Protection-KGM.doc Mr Simon Cordell
109 Burncroft Ave Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ 25/11/2013 KGM House 14
Eastwood Close London E18 1RZ Dear Sir or Madam Subject access
request Mr Simon Cordell 109
Burncroft Ave Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ Ø Please supply the
information about me I am entitled to under the Data Protection Act 1998
relating to: Ø All data to prove that my
Vehicles were on the database since my insurance was taken out. Ø Phone recording of the 14/11/2013
with the police officer and Jessica advising that Mr Simon Cordell was
carrying tools in his vehicle. Ø Phone call for 26/11/2013 with
Kelly Tiller and the manager of the Charlton vehicle pound, 8 Bramshot
Avenue, Charlton, London, SE7 7HY, saying that there were not tools in the
van Reg CX52 JRZ when it was impounded on the 14/11/2013. Ø And the reason why it still
shows as of today’s date 25/11/2013 that my Van Reg CX52 JRZ still
shows on the Mid data base as uninsured. Ø All phone calls made to
Broadsure Direct and KGM since my policy started where the police have had to
call to confirm I was in fact insured. Ø If there is any data that
cannot be forwarding to me, please state this when forwarding me my data. 42, Ø If you need any
more information from me, or a fee, please let me know as soon as possible. Ø It may be helpful
for you to know that a request for information under the Data Protection Act
1998 should be responded to within 40 days. Ø If you do not
normally deal with these requests, please pass this letter to your Data
Protection Officer. Ø If you need advice
on dealing with this request, the Information Commissioner’s Office can
assist you and can be contacted on 0303 123 1113 or at www.ico.org.uk/ Yours faithfully Mr Simon Cordell 43, RE: Simon
Cordell->Kelly-Tiller-KGM.doc Mr Simon Cordell
109 Burncroft Ave Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ 25/11/2013 KGM House 14
Eastwood Close London E18 1RZ Dear Kelly Tiller Ø Would it please be
possible to confirm by email that I am in fact still insured so I have this
in writing by KGM. Ø Also, I have talked
to Martin and he has told me that you need the logbook for my Vehicles, I am
still waiting for them to come back from DVLA and as soon as I get them back
which can take up to 8 weeks, I have been told by DVLA on the phone today, I
will scan them in and send them over to Martin. Ø Also, can you
please look into the reason that my Van CX52 JRZ is still showing up on the
database as uninsured as of today’s date. Ø My Car MA57 LDY is
now showing as insured. Yours faithfully Mr Simon Cordell 1 x1 Email Police
Car Compound Sent: 26 November 2013 14:10 From: GARETH.Mullett@met.pnn.police.uk Mail To: GARETH.Mullett@met.pnn.police.uk On
Behalf Of VresCharlton@met.pnn.police.uk To: Tiller, Kelly Subject: RE: MR.
Simon Cordell - CX52 Xxxx Ø Kelly, I looked at
the seizure notice nothing was taken at the roadside Ø and nothing was
registered as left in the vehicle. Regards,
Gareth 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 142. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon
Cordell / Page Numbers: 307, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 26
November 2013 15:46 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Attachments: Data-Protection-KGM.doc; Kelly-Tiller-KGM.doc Hello Martin, Ø
Thank you for the phone call
today to tell me I was still insured. Ø
Could you please pass on the
attached documents to Kelly Tiller at KGM one is a Subject access request
under the Data Protection Act 1998. Ø
The other letter is just to get
Kelly Tiller to confirm by email I am in fact still insured so I have this in
writing and also to found out why my van is still not showing up on the
database. Ø
And also, about the logbooks
which I am still waiting for them from DVLA I called DVLA today when I got
back from the compound and was told it can take 8 weeks for me to get the new
logbooks, I will therefore send then right over to you by email as soon as I
get them. Many Thanks Simon Cordell |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
27/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 144. Lorraine
Cordell _RE_ Simon Cordell Case update / Page Numbers: 308 Brixton
Case / Met Police! Broadsure
Insurance! |
28/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 144. Lorraine Cordell _RE_
Simon Cordell Case update / Page Numbers: 308, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 28 November 2013 13:41
To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Case update Hi Josey Ø Is there any update as to Simon case have you got any of
the information from the crown yet and how is the 3-party discloser going
with the insurance company as the case is on the WL for the 16/12/2013 and there not many weeks left till this date? Ø Also, an update as to the other day when the police
seized Simon case. Ø The police officer called Simon insurance it was at this
point he told the Insurance company that Simon had tools in his van. Ø And the insurance company has this recorded. Ø The insurance company was then going to void Simon
insurance due to what the police office had told them. The insurance was
going to be closed as of the 23/11/2013 Ø Simon then told the insurance company if they close his
insurance down that he will sure as he did not have any tools the insurance
company give him till the 25/11/2013 at 12.00 hours to prove in
fact he did not have tools in his van. Ø We called the police and was told to contract the
compound the van was taken to as they have to list everything that’s in any
vehicles that are in a vehicle that is taken to any of these compounds. Ø The insurance company asked Simon to go to the compound
and call them when he got there to be able to talk to the police at the
compound with Simon being there as they would need Simon to be there to be
able give the police permission to talk to the insurance company. Ø Simon did this on the 26/11/2013 Ø when he got to the compound, he asked to speak to a
manager which he was allowed to do the manager looked on their system and
told Simon his van had nothing in there. Ø A call was then made to his insurance company and the
manager told them the Van had no tools in there in fact it had nothing in
there as if it did it would have been noted on their system and the items
would need to be taken out and locked up or they could be liable. Ø The insurance company now have not closed Simon
insurance down and now know that the police officer lied to them. Ø So, in fact the police were setting Simon up again. Lorraine |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
29/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
30/11/2013 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Simulation December 2013 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
December 2013 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
06/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Simon had a letter from
policy plan saying they were cancelling his policy the letter was dated 12/05/2014 and they said they were
cancelling seven days from the date of their letter. Not sure as to why as when
Simon got your letter dated the 06/05/2014 we sent the documents you
asked for to policy plan. Please see attached documents which were posted
to policy plan. Could you please see as to the? reason as why they are
cancelling his policy please? Regards Simon Mothers Rover car crash claim which was given on the
phone to KGM on the 09/12/2013, where Simon was driving my
car to service it the Rover Reg Y311 FVV. |
09/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Southwark Case / Page Numbers: 326,327,328 Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! My Company Too Smooth! |
11/12/2013 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Southwark Case / Page
Numbers: 326,327,328, 327, Subject: FW: Regina v. Simon Cordell - application
for Judge and Chambers bail application on 28th June 2013 At Southwark Crown Court. From: Lorraine Cordell (lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk) To: re_wired@ymail.com; Date: Wednesday, 11 December 2013, 22:06 From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent: 27 June 2013 09:35 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Fwd.: Regina v. Simon Cordell -
application for Judge and Chambers bail application on 28th June 2013 At Southwark Crown Court. Morning Lorraine Ø
Please
accept this email as confirmation that I have requested that Simon's bail
application be listed tomorrow morning for bail. Ø
He will
not be produced but I may have to require you to attend with the Post Office
statement and also, your passport and a utility bill with your address on it.
Ø
I will
confirm if you are required this afternoon. Regards Josephine ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: JOSEPHINE WARD <josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:32 AM Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell - application
for Judge and Chambers bail application on 28th June 2013 At Southwark Crown Court. To: listing@southwark.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk Cc: Innerlondon&Southwarkcrown@cps.gsi.gov.uk Dear Sir or Madam Ø
We act
on behalf of our above-named client and request that this matter be listed
for a bail application at Southwark Crown Court on 28th June 2013 at
10am. We attach the following:
328,
Yours faithfully MICHAEL CARROLL & CO. Attachments
|
||||
|
|
18/12/2013 “Due to this Simon is not
driving the van as he does not want to get pulled again by the police which I
don’t think is right as he has in fact paid his insurance to be able to
drive.” |
12/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
18/12/2013 “Due to this Simon is not
driving the van as he does not want to get pulled again by the police which I
don’t think is right as he has in fact paid his insurance to be able to
drive.” |
13/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
18/12/2013 “Due to this Simon is not
driving the van as he does not want to get pulled again by the police which I
don’t think is right as he has in fact paid his insurance to be able to
drive.” |
14/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
18/12/2013 “Due to this Simon is not
driving the van as he does not want to get pulled again by the police which I
don’t think is right as he has in fact paid his insurance to be able to
drive.” |
15/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
18/12/2013 “Due to this Simon is not
driving the van as he does not want to get pulled again by the police which I
don’t think is right as he has in fact paid his insurance to be able to
drive.” 1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 144.
Lorraine Cordell _RE_ Simon Cordell Case update / Page Numbers: 308, |
16/12/2013 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 144. Lorraine Cordell _RE_
Simon Cordell Case update / Page Numbers: 308, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 28 November 2013 13:41
To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Case update Hi Josey Ø Is there any update as to Simon case have you got any of
the information from the crown yet and how is the 3-party discloser going
with the insurance company as the case is on the WL for the 16/12/2013 and there not many weeks left till this date? |
||||
|
|
18/12/2013 “Due to this Simon is not
driving the van as he does not want to get pulled again by the police which I
don’t think is right as he has in fact paid his insurance to be able to
drive.” |
17/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 158. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 375 Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
18/12/2013 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 158. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 375, From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
18
December 2013 13:06 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Ø I have still not had a reply from KGM about the data
protection or an email from them to say he is in fact still insured. Ø And on the Mid database the van is still showing as not
insured, due to this Simon is not driving
the van as he does not want to get pulled again by the police which I don’t
think is right as he has in fact paid his insurance to be able to drive it if
he needs to can this please be sorted out as he really does not want any more
problems with getting pulled over due to it not showing up as insured. Ø I also have called DVLA again about the logbook and have
been told that they should be with us soon. Many Thanks Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 26 November 2013 15:46 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin, Ø
Thank you for the phone call
today to tell me I was still insured. Ø
Could you please pass on the
attached documents to Kelly Tiller at KGM one is a Subject access request
under the Data Protection Act 1998. The other letter is just to get Kelly
Tiller to confirm by email I am in fact still insured so I have this in
writing and also to found out why my van is still not showing up on the database.
Ø
And also, about the logbooks
which I am still waiting for them from DVLA I called DVLA today when I got
back from the compound and was told it can take 8 weeks for me to get the new
logbooks, I will therefore send then right over to you by email as soon as I
get them. Many Thanks Simon Cordell |
||||
|
|
18/12/2013 “Due to this Simon is not
driving the van as he does not want to get pulled again by the police which I
don’t think is right as he has in fact paid his insurance to be able to
drive.” |
19/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
18/12/2013 “Due to this Simon is not
driving the van as he does not want to get pulled again by the police which I
don’t think is right as he has in fact paid his insurance to be able to
drive.” |
20/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
18/12/2013 “Due to this Simon is not
driving the van as he does not want to get pulled again by the police which I
don’t think is right as he has in fact paid his insurance to be able to
drive.” |
21/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
18/12/2013 “Due to this Simon is not
driving the van as he does not want to get pulled again by the police which I
don’t think is right as he has in fact paid his insurance to be able to
drive.” |
22/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
18/12/2013 “Due to this Simon is not
driving the van as he does not want to get pulled again by the police which I
don’t think is right as he has in fact paid his insurance to be able to
drive.” |
23/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
18/12/2013 “Due to this Simon is not
driving the van as he does not want to get pulled again by the police which I
don’t think is right as he has in fact paid his insurance to be able to
drive.” ·
·
Gazebo Case Bail Variation! |
24/12/2013 |
|
|
|
1 Gazebo
Case Bail Variation! Ø On the 24/12/2014 Ø I went back to Woolwich Crown
Court with a fresh application to vary my bail conditions for Christmas and
New Year periods, so I could spend time with my family’s members. Ø I applied to go
to Scotland with my family over the New Year and the application to
vary bail had gotten granted by the Judge, so I could go. Ø To be honest, I got shocked
when the bail variation got granted but I smiled to be out, for the first
time in a year. Ø The judge on the day agreed
to amend these three conditions.
Ø with the judge doing this it
meant that I still had a curfew off 8pm; till 6am and this was with a change
of home address. |
||||
|
|
|
25/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
28/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/12/2013 |
|
|
|
|
Diary checked
up to here! 1 ·
I was in
Scotland Bail conditions varied! |
31/12/2013 |
|
|
|
1 I was in Scotland Bail
conditions varied! Let’s say next. I needed to explain to the
judge that on the date of 31/12/2014 — 01/01/2014 Ø I was in Scotland and had to leave
early with my family to come back home and on the way as I entered London’s
streets; the police pulled me over in the early hours of the 01/01/2014 the time then was 05:55 Am, the reason I got pulled
over got said to be for the normal accusations of the police force and that
being of, No insurance again due to the error in the MID database. Ø Again, I told the police
officer’s that I got insured and there were also notes on the police system
to prove this, but they still arrested me and seized my van. Ø I got arrested due to the
police officers saying I breached my bail conditions and then as a
consequence off their actions I got held at the police station and taken to
court on the 01/01/2014 Ø My mother also attended the
courthouse on this incident and once the judge heard my explanation of what
happened to me, in turn, me stating to the judge that I had not breached my
bail conditions on this occasion; I was soon then after released to go back
to my home. Ø After being released from
being detained I had to travel back to the police car compound, so I could
pick up my van, I recollect the day being the 03/01/2014 to my
upset I once again needed to pay again to get my property released with no
guilty offence taking place. |
||||
Simulation January
2014 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
January
2014 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
·
·
No insurance. Had to pick up the van from
the police compound, once again. I had to pay when I clearly had insurance! |
01/01/2014 |
|
|
|
Case No 011401596899 Ø
On 01/01/2014
I was stopped by the police as they did not believe that I held a valid
policy of insurance. Ø
Due to this being a
holiday my insurance company was closed so the police could not check if I
was in fact was insured, Van to be taken out of the compound but still
impounded my van reg CX52 JRZ. Ø
After the holidays I
went to the compound and had to again pay for my Van to be taken out of the
compound. Ø
I never received any
summons in relation to this matter and I only became aware that the case had
been dealt with in my absence when Ø
I received a letter
from the DVLA advising me that I had to send in my driving licence. Ø
I disputed with the
DVLA the points, but I was given an ultimatum that if I did not Ø
send in my licence
it would be revoked. Ø
I had a valid policy
of insurance from 23/02/2013 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2014
Ø
The company insuring
me was KGM, and my broker was Broadsure direct Ø
policy number is
MT3574694 |
||||
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 162. Martin Jenkin _Simon
Cordell / Page Numbers: 379,380, 2 ·
No insurance. Had to pick up the van from
the police compound, once again. I had to pay when I clearly had insurance! |
02/01/2014 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 162. Martin Jenkin _Simon
Cordell /
Page Numbers: 379,380, From:
Martin
Jenkin [martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent:
02
January 2014 16:51 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject:
Simon
Cordell Lorraine,
Ø as per telephone conversation today please find a screen
print from the insurance company KGM confirming that vehicle reg CX52 JRZ
should be showing on the database. Ø I have today contacted the MIB and spoken to a young
lady named Sam who has confirmed the vehicle in question IS showing as
insured with KGM Insurance, there seems to be an issue with the ASK mid
database but Sam has assured me that the Police National Computer accesses
the MID direct and this should not cause a problem. Ø If the police contacted the MIB regarding the vehicle
they will confirm that the vehicle is insured under policy number MT3574694 Regards
Martin
Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 380, t:
01843 594477 f:
01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure
Direct ‐ Telephone number: 01843
594477 ‐ Fax Number: 01843
594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This
e‐mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for
the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged
and confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you
must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this e‐mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as
possible and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve
the right to, monitor e‐mail communications passing through our
network. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Is
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. |
||||
|
|
2 ·
No insurance. Had to pick up the van
from the police compound, once again. I had to pay when I clearly had
insurance! Broadsure Insurance! |
03/01/2014 |
|
|
|
2 No insurance. Had
to pick up the van from the police compound, once again. I had to pay when I
clearly had insurance! |
||||
|
|
|
04/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
27/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/01/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/01/2014 |
|
|
Simulation
February 2014 (Click
here to go back to the Index)
|
February
2014 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
12. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.12 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.06.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 06/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 59,60 61,62,63,64,65,66 67,68 “This email was missing,
taken from the 06/03/2014” |
19/02/2014 |
|
|
|
12. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.12 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.06.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 06/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 59,60 61,62,63,64,65,66 67,68 -- 59, 60, 61, 62, -- From: Lorraine Cordell mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 19 February 2014
13:36 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: Re: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. Mr. Simon Paul Cordell 109
Burncroft Road Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ 18/02/2014 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email as I
have an ongoing case at Woolwich Crown Court, and I have noticed some errors
in my PNC record which the police printed of at around 25/06/2013. I would be very grateful if
you can pull up the following records so I can check them with the PNC the
police printed off for the case that is ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court, I
have been told I will need a Memorandum of conviction or the transcript for
the case. I do know there are some
errors on the cases that was heard at Enfield Magistrates and can see them
clearly, but due to how far they go back cannot remember some of the cases. I
do also know some are correct but due to some dates being wrong on some of
the ones I can see errors in I would 63, like to check all the cases
on the PNC that was heard at Enfield Magistrates. If this can be done as a
matter of urgency due to the impact this is having on my life with the case
that is ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court and my bail and other issues. If the information could be
emailed to me, I would be grateful as I am next in court on March 2014 and
would like this information of any errors so I can show the judge. Please see below the lists of
cases I would like information on.
End of Picture! 64,
End of Picture! 65,
End of Picture! 66,
End of Picture! 67,
End of Picture! Yours faithfully Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB
26/01/ This email was
received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet
anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your
organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. This e-mail (and
any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised
use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the
intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return
e-mail. Internet e-mail is
not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read
by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send
material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail
(whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and
retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software
may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a
responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding
e-mails and their contents. The original of
this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified
virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email was
received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet
anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your
organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. This e-mail (and
any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying 68, is not permitted.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform
the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is
not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read
by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send
material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail
(whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and
retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software
may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a
responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding
e-mails and their contents. The original of
this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified
virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email was
received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet
anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your
organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. This e-mail (and
any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you
are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the
sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is
not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read
by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send
material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail
(whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and
retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software
may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a
responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding
e-mails and their contents. The original of
this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified
virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email was
received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet
anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your
organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. This e-mail (and
any attachment) is intended only for the attention of 69, the addressee(s).
Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If
you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the
sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is
not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read
by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send
material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail
(whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and
retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software
may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a
responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding
e-mails and their contents. The original of
this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified
virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. |
||||
|
|
12. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.12 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.06.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 06/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 59,60 61,62,63,64,65,66 67,68 “This email was missing,
taken from the 06/03/2014” |
20/02/2014 |
|
|
|
12. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.12 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.06.2014_RE Simon Cordell Errors
on Cases. 06/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 59,60 61,62,63,64,65,66 67,68 -- 59, 60, 61, -- From: Lorraine Cordell mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 20 February 2014
12:29 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. Hello Ø
I do understand that
most of the items listed in my emails are archived due to their date but as I
can see errors in the dates of some of the things and I know this as fact I
would like all items checked that is listed so that it can be checked against
the PNC records, I have got the printout from. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto:
gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 20 February 2014
12:14 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 62, Dear Mr Cordell, Ø Further to the
conversation between Mrs Cordell and a member of staff yesterday, please
specify which dates and offences you wish us to check. Ø Almost all the
offences are archived and not immediately accessible using the computer;
specific dates and offences would help reduce the delay in providing this
information. Regards, Customer Services
Unit Administration Office Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither
authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make
representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in
any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 19 February 2014 13:36 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Mr. Simon Paul Cordell 109 Burncroft Road Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ
18/02/2014 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email as I have an ongoing case at Woolwich Crown
Court, and I have noticed some errors in my PNC record which the police
printed of at around 25/06/2013. I would be very grateful if you can pull up the following records so I
can check them with the PNC the police printed off for the case that is
ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court, I have been told I will need a Memorandum of
conviction or the transcript for the case. I do know there are some errors on the cases that was heard at Enfield
Magistrates and can see them clearly, but due to how far they go back cannot
remember some of the cases. I do also know some are correct but due to some
dates being wrong on some of the ones I can see errors in I would 63, like to check all the cases on the PNC that was heard at Enfield
Magistrates. If this can be done as a matter of urgency due to the impact this is
having on my life with the case that is ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court and
my bail and other issues. If the information could be emailed to me, I would be grateful as I am
next in court on March 2014 and would like this information of any errors so
I can show the judge. Please see below the lists of cases I would like information on.
End of Picture! 64,
End of Picture! 65,
End of Picture! 66,
End of Picture! 67,
End of Picture! Yours faithfully Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB 26/01/ This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage or copying 68, is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of 69, the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. |
||||
|
|
12. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.12 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.06.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 06/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 59,60 61,62,63,64,65,66 67,68 “This email was missing,
taken from the 06/03/2014” |
21/02/2014 |
|
|
|
12. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.12 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.06.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 06/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 59,60 61,62,63,64,65,66 67,68 -- 59, 60, 61, -- From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto:
gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 21 February 2014
16:06 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
The records you
request are at another court. Ø
We will begin
searching for them next week when the court is open. Regards, Customer Services Unit
Administration Officer Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither
authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make
representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in
any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 20 February 2014 12:29 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Hello I do understand that most of the items listed in my emails are
archived due to their date but as I can see errors in the dates of some of
the things and I know this as fact I would like all items checked that is
listed so that it can be checked against the PNC records, I have got the
printout from. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 20 February 2014 12:14 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. 62, Dear Mr Cordell, Further to the conversation between Mrs Cordell
and a member of staff yesterday, please specify which dates and offences you
wish us to check. Almost all the offences are archived and not immediately
accessible using the computer; specific dates and offences would help reduce
the delay in providing this information. Regards, Customer Services Unit Administration Office
Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 19 February 2014 13:36 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Mr. Simon Paul Cordell 109 Burncroft Road Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ
18/02/2014 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email as I have an ongoing case at Woolwich Crown
Court, and I have noticed some errors in my PNC record which the police
printed of at around 25/06/2013. I would be very grateful if you can pull up the following records so I
can check them with the PNC the police printed off for the case that is
ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court, I have been told I will need a Memorandum of
conviction or the transcript for the case. I do know there are some errors on the cases that was heard at Enfield
Magistrates and can see them clearly, but due to how far they go back cannot
remember some of the cases. I do also know some are correct but due to some
dates being wrong on some of the ones I can see errors in I would 63, like to check all the cases on the PNC that was heard at Enfield
Magistrates. If this can be done as a matter of urgency due to the impact this is
having on my life with the case that is ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court and
my bail and other issues. If the information could be emailed to me, I would be grateful as I am
next in court on March 2014 and would like this information of any errors so
I can show the judge. Please see below the lists of cases I would like information on.
End of Picture! 64,
End of Picture! 65,
End of Picture! 66,
End of Picture! 67,
End of Picture! Yours faithfully Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB 26/01/ This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage or copying 68, is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of 69, the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. |
||||
|
|
|
22/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/02/2014 |
|
|
|
8. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 8 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.24.2014_RE RE Simon
Cordell CX52JRZ 24/02/2014 / Page Numbers: 44,45 1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 227.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell CX52JRZ / Page
Numbers: 538 Brixton
Case / Met Police! Broadsure
Insurance! 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 228. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell REG CX52JRX / Page Numbers: 539 Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
24/02/2014 |
16:34:00 |
X2 44,45 |
|
|
9. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 9 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.24.2014_RE Simon Cordell
REG CX52JRX 24/02/2014 / Page Numbers: 46,47 |
24/02/2014 |
19:09:00 |
X2 46,47 |
|
|
8. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 8 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.24.2014_RE RE Simon
Cordell CX52JRZ 24/02/2014 / Page Numbers: 44,45 -- 44, From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 24 February 2014
16:34 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: RE: Simon
Cordell CX52JRZ Attachments: sold-Van-CX52JRZ.jpg Hi Martin Ø
After the call today
please see the attached recipe for the Van CX52JRZ Lorraine 45,
End of Picture! 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 227. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell CX52JRZ / Page Numbers: 538, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 24
February 2014 16:34 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: RE: Simon
Cordell CX52JRZ Attachments: soldVanCX52JRZ.jpg Hi Martin Ø
After the call today please see
the attached recipe for the Van CX52JRZ Lorraine 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 228. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell REG CX52JRX / Page Numbers: 539, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 24
February 2014 19:09 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell REG CX52JRX Attachments: SoldVanCX52JRZ27042013.jpg; BuyVanrecieptCX52JRZ10112013.jpg Hi Martin Ø
Today when I sent over the
recipe for the van, I sent over the wrong one. Ø
Simon has just come here and
showed me the last 2 recipes for the van. Ø
I believe you already have the 10/11/2013 Ø
as I emailed this over to you
on the 15/11/2013 at 15.57 Lorraine 9. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 9 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.24.2014_RE Simon Cordell
REG CX52JRX 24/02/2014 / Page Numbers: 46,47 -- 46, From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 24 February 2014
19:09 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: Simon Cordell REG
CX52JRX Attachments: Sold-Van-CX52JRZ-27-04-2013.jpg Buy-Van-reciept-CX52JRZ-10-11-2013.jpg Hi Martin Ø Today when I sent
over the recipe for the van, I sent over the wrong one. Ø Simon has just come
here and showed me the last 2 recipes for the van. Ø I believe you
already have the 10/11/2013 as I emailed this over to you on the 15/11/2013
at 15.57 Lorraine 47,
End of Picture!
End of Picture! |
||||
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 230. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (24) / Page Numbers: 541 Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
25/02/2014 |
|
||
|
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 230. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (24) /
Page Numbers: 541, From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
25
February 2014 14:31 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Ø Can you please give an update as to what is going on
please with my insurance? Ø I do not think it is right that KGM are doing this with
my no claims, KGM has made one phone call to me about a claim on the 14/09/2013 Ø where I told them, I would send the invoice for the van,
since this time I have not had one single letter to say they did not get the
invoice, or any letters about this so-called claim for the 14/09/2013 Ø and this is nearly 6 months old now. Ø How can it be I have not had one single letter yet now
my insurance is due to be renewed they bring up this and this is nearly 6
months down the line and I have heard nothing about this claim since I talked
to someone from KGM on the phone back in Sep
2013? Ø I have still not had any letters about the subject
access request under the data protect act 1998, and the letter I emailed
yourself to send over to KGM on the 26/11/2013 at 15.46 and will now be
taking this up with the ICO. Ø I have never had so many problems with an insurance
company in my life then what I have had in the past year with KGM and will be
taking this up with the insurance ombudsman I have already spoken to them and
they are very shocked at what I have told them and that is not all of it,
they have asked me to write it all down and send it to them by email which I
will be doing. Ø There should be only one thing that is outstanding and
that is the issue for the 09/12/2013, I have made 3 calls to the claim
line to inform them what happened and yes there is a claim which was not my
fault being addressed. Ø I am at this time waiting for someone to contract me
about this matter as this is what I was told the last time I made a call about
it. Ø Could this be looked into also so I know that it is
being addressed in the correct way and I am not just waiting for someone to
contact me and this does not happen as I would like to get this addressed as
soon as possible so that KGM will see this claim was not my fault. Ø I would like to get insured yet for the past days have
not been able to do so as I am waiting for information on a quote and also to
hear back about what KGM is doing with my 10 years no claims which was
protected. Ø I have been with Broadsure for a few years now and have
never had any problems with you. Simon |
||||
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 233. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (25) / Page
Numbers: 544 Broadsure Insurance! Driving Ban (1)/? |
26/02/2014 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 233. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (25) /
Page Numbers: 544, From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 26 February 2015 22:31 To: 'GL-BrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Cc: 'Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Subject:
Re: Simon
Cordell Attachments: Simon_Cordell_Appeal_Willesden_Harrow_Crown_Court.pdf; Found
Guilty again -26-01-2015.pdf Dear
Annabel Jereniah Ø I have just seen the
Memorandum of Entry that the Crown Court has sent and on that it says there
was a Disqualification until test passed.
Ø But when we contacted the
court, we were only told about 6 points and a fine for this case and this was
also on the letter from the court. Ø If I knew a Disqualification
until test passed when I filed my appeal on the 13/02/2015 Ø I would have ticked this be
suspended until appeal was heard. Ø Can you please look into this
and see if the appeal could include the suspension of the Disqualification
until the appeal is heard? Ø Please see attached document Ø Simon_ Cordell_ Appeal_
Willesden_ Harrow_ Crown_ Court Found Guilty again 26-01-2015 Ø As you will see the letter
Found Guilty again 26-01-2015 Ø does not show any
disqualification and this was confirmed by the court when we called that
there were 6 points added and a fine. Regards Lorraine Cordell |
||||
|
|
27/02/2014 |
|||
|
|
|
27/02/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2014 |
|
|
Simulation March 2014 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
March
2014 |
|||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
||||
|
|
|
01/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
12. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.12 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.06.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 06/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 59,60 61,62,63,64,65,66 67,68 “This email was missing,
taken from the 06/03/2014” |
03/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
12. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.12 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.06.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 06/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 59,60 61,62,63,64,65,66 67,68 -- 59, 60, From: Lorraine Cordell mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 14:39
To: 'GL-HCORNERMCENQ' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: Ø
After your email
dated the 21/02/2014 I was thinking that you would be searching for
the data from the week of the 24/02/2014 as this is what it said in
the email. Ø
As I said in my 1st
email when asking for the information, I have a case that is at Woolwich
crown court and I am having problems with my bail due to the records on my PNC, I am due in court maybe tomorrow or this
week as my solicitor is putting into court to have a hearing and I wanted to
have any errors on the PNC addressed at court. Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto:
gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 13:48
To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
Staff will be
searching for the requested Registers from tomorrow. Ø
We will contact you
as soon as this is done. Regards, Customer Services Unit
Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither
authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make
representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in
any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 13:22 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I was wondering if
there were any updates as to the data, I have asked for so that I can check
cases against my PNC file. 61, Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 21 February 2014 16:06 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, The records you request are at another court. We will begin searching
for them next week when the court is open. Regards, Customer Services Unit Administration Officer Highbury Corner
Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 20 February 2014 12:29 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Hello I do understand that most of the items listed in my emails are
archived due to their date but as I can see errors in the dates of some of
the things and I know this as fact I would like all items checked that is
listed so that it can be checked against the PNC records, I have got the
printout from. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 20 February 2014 12:14 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. 62, Dear Mr Cordell, Further to the conversation between Mrs Cordell and
a member of staff yesterday, please specify which dates and offences you wish
us to check. Almost all the offences are archived and not immediately
accessible using the computer; specific dates and offences would help reduce
the delay in providing this information. Regards, Customer Services Unit Administration Office
Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 19 February 2014 13:36 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Mr. Simon Paul Cordell 109 Burncroft Road Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ
18/02/2014 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email as I have an ongoing case at Woolwich Crown
Court, and I have noticed some errors in my PNC record which the police
printed of at around 25/06/2013. I would be very grateful if you can pull up the following records so I
can check them with the PNC the police printed off for the case that is
ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court, I have been told I will need a Memorandum of
conviction or the transcript for the case. I do know there are some errors on the cases that was heard at Enfield
Magistrates and can see them clearly, but due to how far they go back cannot
remember some of the cases. I do also know some are correct but due to some
dates being wrong on some of the ones I can see errors in I would 63, like to check all the cases on the PNC that was heard at Enfield
Magistrates. If this can be done as a matter of urgency due to the impact this is
having on my life with the case that is ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court and
my bail and other issues. If the information could be emailed to me, I would be grateful as I am
next in court on March 2014 and would like this information of any errors so
I can show the judge. Please see below the lists of cases I would like information on.
End of Picture! 64,
End of Picture! 65,
End of Picture! 66,
End of Picture! 67,
End of Picture! Yours faithfully Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB 26/01/ This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage or copying 68, is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of 69, the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. |
|||||
|
|
12. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.12 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.06.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 06/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 59,60 61,62,63,64,65,66 67,68 “This email was missing,
taken from the 06/03/2014” |
04/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
12. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.12 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.06.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 06/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 59,60 61,62,63,64,65,66 67,68 -- 59, From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto:
gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 04 March 2014 15:23
To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Ø Staff are looking
for the records at Enfield Magistrates Court this week; however, we will not
have them for tomorrow morning. Ø We will endeavour
to have as many as possible before Thursday. Ø If there are
specific dates you needed particularly, these could be accessed first. Regards, Customer Services
Unit Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither
authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make
representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in
any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 04 March 2014 15:08 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am wondering if
there is any update, as I am in Woolwich Crown
Court tomorrow and as said I wanted the information before I went to court. 60, Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 14:39 To: 'GL-HCORNERMCENQ' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: After your email dated the 21/02/2014 I was thinking that you
would be searching for the data from the week of the 24/02/2014 as
this is what it said in the email. As I said in my 1st email when asking for
the information, I have a case that is at Woolwich crown court and I am
having problems with my bail due to the records on my PNC, I am due in court maybe tomorrow or
this week as my solicitor is putting into court to have a hearing and I
wanted to have any errors on the PNC addressed at court. Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 13:48 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Staff will be searching for the requested Registers from tomorrow. We will
contact you as soon as this is done. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 13:22 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I was wondering if there were any updates as to the data, I have asked
for so that I can check cases against my PNC file. 61, Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 21 February 2014 16:06 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, The records you request are at another court. We will begin searching
for them next week when the court is open. Regards, Customer Services Unit Administration Officer Highbury Corner
Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 20 February 2014 12:29 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Hello I do understand that most of the items listed in my emails are
archived due to their date but as I can see errors in the dates of some of
the things and I know this as fact I would like all items checked that is
listed so that it can be checked against the PNC records, I have got the
printout from. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 20 February 2014 12:14 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. 62, Dear Mr Cordell, Further to the conversation between Mrs Cordell
and a member of staff yesterday, please specify which dates and offences you
wish us to check. Almost all the offences are archived and not immediately
accessible using the computer; specific dates and offences would help reduce
the delay in providing this information. Regards, Customer Services Unit Administration Office
Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 19 February 2014 13:36 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Mr. Simon Paul Cordell 109 Burncroft Road Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ
18/02/2014 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email as I have an ongoing case at Woolwich Crown
Court, and I have noticed some errors in my PNC record which the police
printed of at around 25/06/2013. I would be very grateful if you can pull up the following records so I
can check them with the PNC the police printed off for the case that is
ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court, I have been told I will need a Memorandum of
conviction or the transcript for the case. I do know there are some errors on the cases that was heard at Enfield
Magistrates and can see them clearly, but due to how far they go back cannot
remember some of the cases. I do also know some are correct but due to some
dates being wrong on some of the ones I can see errors in I would 63, like to check all the cases on the PNC that was heard at Enfield
Magistrates. If this can be done as a matter of urgency due to the impact this is
having on my life with the case that is ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court and
my bail and other issues. If the information could be emailed to me, I would be grateful as I am
next in court on March 2014 and would like this information of any errors so
I can show the judge. Please see below the lists of cases I would like information on.
End of Picture! 64,
End of Picture! 65,
End of Picture! 66,
End of Picture! 67,
End of Picture! Yours faithfully Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB 26/01/ This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage or copying 68, is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications
via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of 69, the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. |
|||||
|
|
|
05/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
12. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.12 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.06.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 06/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 59,60 61,62,63,64,65,66 67,68 |
06/03/2014 |
09:38:00 |
X11 59,60 61,62,63,64 65,66,67,68 |
||
|
12. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.12 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.06.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 06/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 59,60 61,62,63,64,65,66 67,68 -- 59, From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 06 March 2014 09:38 To: 'GL-HCORNERMCENQ' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am writing this to
ask if there is any update, they did not list my case yesterday and it is now
listed for today at Woolwich at 2pm so I was
wondering if you had any of the data, Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 04 March 2014 15:23 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Staff are looking for the records at Enfield
Magistrates Court this week; however, we will not have them for tomorrow
morning. We will endeavour to
have as many as possible before Thursday. If there are specific dates you
needed particularly, these could be accessed first. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 04 March 2014 15:08 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am wondering if there is any update, as I am in Woolwich Crown Court tomorrow and as said I wanted
the information before I went to court. 60, Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 14:39 To: 'GL-HCORNERMCENQ' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: After your email dated the 21/02/2014 I was thinking that you
would be searching for the data from the week of the 24/02/2014 as
this is what it said in the email. As I said in my 1st email when asking for
the information, I have a case that is at Woolwich crown court and I am
having problems with my bail due to the records on my PNC, I am due in court maybe tomorrow or
this week as my solicitor is putting into court to have a hearing and I
wanted to have any errors on the PNC addressed at court. Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 13:48 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Staff will be searching for the requested Registers from tomorrow. We
will contact you as soon as this is done. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 13:22 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I was wondering if there were any updates as to the data, I have asked
for so that I can check cases against my PNC file. 61, Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 21 February 2014 16:06 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, The records you request are at another court. We will begin searching
for them next week when the court is open. Regards, Customer Services Unit Administration Officer Highbury Corner
Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 20 February 2014 12:29 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Hello I do understand that most of the items listed in my emails are
archived due to their date but as I can see errors in the dates of some of
the things and I know this as fact I would like all items checked that is
listed so that it can be checked against the PNC records, I have got the
printout from. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 20 February 2014 12:14 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. 62, Dear Mr Cordell, Further to the conversation between Mrs Cordell
and a member of staff yesterday, please specify which dates and offences you
wish us to check. Almost all the offences are archived and not immediately
accessible using the computer; specific dates and offences would help reduce
the delay in providing this information. Regards, Customer Services Unit Administration Office
Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 19 February 2014 13:36 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Mr. Simon Paul Cordell 109 Burncroft Road Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ
18/02/2014 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email as I have an ongoing case at Woolwich Crown Court,
and I have noticed some errors in my PNC record which the police printed of
at around 25/06/2013. I would be very grateful if you can pull up the following records so I
can check them with the PNC the police printed off for the case that is
ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court, I have been told I will need a Memorandum of
conviction or the transcript for the case. I do know there are some errors on the cases that was heard at Enfield
Magistrates and can see them clearly, but due to how far they go back cannot
remember some of the cases. I do also know some are correct but due to some
dates being wrong on some of the ones I can see errors in I would 63, like to check all the cases on the PNC that was heard at Enfield
Magistrates. If this can be done as a matter of urgency due to the impact this is
having on my life with the case that is ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court and
my bail and other issues. If the information could be emailed to me, I would be grateful as I am
next in court on March 2014 and would like this information of any errors so
I can show the judge. Please see below the lists of cases I would like information on.
End of Picture! 64,
End of Picture! 65,
End of Picture! 66,
End of Picture! 67,
End of Picture! Yours faithfully Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB 26/01/ This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage or copying 68, is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of 69, the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. |
|||||
|
|
|
07/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
14 Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 14 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.10.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 10/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 72 73,74,75,76,77,78 79,80,81,82 PNC 16. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 16 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.12.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 12/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 85,86,87,88,89,90 91,92,93,94,95,96 “This email was
missing” |
10/03/2014 |
12:43:00 |
X11 72 73,74,75,76 77,78,79,80 81,82, |
||
|
14. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 14 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.10.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 10/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 72 73,74,75,76,77,78 79,80,81,82 -- 72, From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 10 March 2014 12:43 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am writing this
email to see if there is any update to the information that I have asked for. Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 04 March 2014 15:23 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Staff are looking for the records at Enfield
Magistrates Court this week; however, we will not have them for tomorrow
morning. We will endeavour to have as many as possible before Thursday. If
there are specific dates you needed particularly, these could be accessed
first. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner
Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 04 March 2014 15:08 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am wondering if there is any update, as I am in Woolwich Crown Court
tomorrow and as said I wanted the information before I went to court. 73, Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 14:39 To: 'GL-HCORNERMCENQ' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: After your email dated the 21/02/2014 I was thinking that you would be
searching for the data from the week of the 24/02/2014 as this is what it
said in the email. As I said in my 1st email when asking for the information,
I have a case that is at Woolwich crown court and I am having problems with
my bail due to the records on my PNC, I am due in court maybe tomorrow or
this week as my solicitor is putting into court to have a hearing and I
wanted to have any errors on the PNC addressed at court. Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 13:48 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Staff will be searching for the requested Registers from tomorrow. We
will contact you as soon as this is done. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner
Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 13:22 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I was wondering if there were any updates as to the data, I have asked
for so that I can check cases against my PNC file. 74, Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcomermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 21 February 2014 16:06 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, The records you request are at another court. We will begin searching
for them next week when the court is open. Regards, Customer Services Unit Administration Officer
Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 20 February 2014 12:29 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Hello I do understand that most of the items listed in my emails are
archived due to their date but as I can see errors in the dates of some of
the things and I know this as fact I would like all items checked that is
listed so that it can be checked against the PNC records, I have got the
printout from. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 20 February 2014 12:14 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. 75, Dear Mr Cordell, Further to the conversation between Mrs Cordell
and a member of staff yesterday, please specify which dates and offences you
wish us to check. Almost all the offences are archived and not immediately
accessible using the computer; specific dates and offences would help reduce
the delay in providing this information. Regards, Customer Services Unit Administration Office
Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 19 February 2014 13:36 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Mr. Simon Paul Cordell 109 Burncroft Road Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ
18/02/2014 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email as I have an ongoing case at Woolwich Crown
Court, and I have noticed some errors in my PNC record which the police
printed of at around 25/06/2013. I would be very grateful if you can pull up the following records so I
can check them with the PNC the police printed off for the case that is
ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court, I have been told I will need a Memorandum of
conviction or the transcript for the case. I do know there are some errors on the cases that was heard at Enfield
Magistrates and can see them clearly, but due to how far they go back cannot
remember some of the cases. I do also know 76,
End of Picture! 77,
End of Picture! 78,
End of Picture! 79,
End of Picture! 80,
End of Picture! 81, is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.)
In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of 82, the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 16. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 16 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.12.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 12/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 85,86,87,88,89,90 91,92,93,94,95,96 -- From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 March 2014 12:59
To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, As confirmed to Mrs
Cordell last week, a member of staff at Tottenham Magistrates Court will
research the Registers listed and copies will be sent, by e-mail, to you as
we recover them. The Court opens Tuesday to Thursday: we hope to have at
least some of the records for you tomorrow. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner Magistrates
Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to
bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or
other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via
electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 10 March 2014 12:43 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email to see if there is any update to the
information that I have asked for. Regards 86, Simon Cordell |
|||||
|
15. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 15 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.11.2014_RE Simon Cordell
DVLA 11/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 83,84 4 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 263.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell DVLA / Page Numbers: 657 Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
11/03/2014 |
11:42:00 |
X2 83,84 |
||
|
15. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 15 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.11.2014_RE Simon Cordell
DVLA 11/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 83,84 -- 83, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 11 March 2014 11:42 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: Simon Cordell DVLA Attachments: DVLA-CX52JRZ.pdf Hi Martin Ø
Please see the
attached letter from DVLA about CX52JRZ. Ø
I got the letter today
but they seem to have put my Surname as Cardell and not Cordell so I will be
contacting them today by phone. Regards, Simon 84,
4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 263. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell DVLA / Page Numbers: 657, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 11
March 2014 11:42 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell DVLA Attachments: DVLACX52JRZ.pdf Hi Martin Ø
Please see the attached letter
from DVLA about CX52JRZ. Ø
I got the letter today but they
seem to have put my Surname as Cardell and not Cordell so I will be
contacting them today by phone. Regards, Simon |
|||||
|
16. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 16 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.12.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 12/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 85,86,87,88,89,90 91,92,93,94,95,96 17. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 17 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.13.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 13/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 97,98,99,100,101,102 103,104,105,106,107,108 109,110,111 PNC “This email was
missing” |
12/03/2014 |
11:59:00 |
X12 85,86,87,88 89,90,91,92 93,94,95,96 |
||
|
16. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 16 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.12.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 12/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 85,86,87,88,89,90 91,92,93,94,95,96 -- 85, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 12 March 2014 11:59 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this to see if
there is any news as to the data I asked for. I was hoping to have got an
email yesterday with some information due to the email you sent me on the 10/02/2014
but I did not. I understand that the court is only open Tuesday to Thursday
which only give till tomorrow as you are aware, I am back in court on the 18/03/2014
which if I do not get anything by tomorrow, I will have to go into court then
with nothing as the court would be closed. Could you therefore let me know if
the data I have asked for will be available by tomorrow? Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 March 2014 12:59 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, As confirmed to Mrs Cordell last week, a member
of staff at Tottenham Magistrates Court will research the Registers listed
and copies will be sent, by e-mail, to you as we recover them. The Court
opens Tuesday to Thursday: we hope to have at least some of the records for
you tomorrow. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually,
nor to make representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry
of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 10 March 2014 12:43 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email to see if there is any update to the
information that I have asked for. Regards 86, Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcomermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 04 March 2014 15:23 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Staff are looking for the records at Enfield
Magistrates Court this week; however, we will not have them for tomorrow
morning. We will endeavour to have as many as possible before Thursday. If
there are specific dates you needed particularly, these could be accessed
first. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner
Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 04 March 2014 15:08 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am wondering if there is any update, as I am in Woolwich Crown Court
tomorrow and as said I wanted the information before I went to court. Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 14:39 To: 'GL-HCORNERMCENQ' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: 87, After your email dated the 21/02/2014 I was thinking that you
would be searching for the data from the week of the 24/02/2014 as
this is what it said in the email. As I said in my 1st email when asking for
the information, I have a case that is at Woolwich crown court and I am
having problems with my bail due to the records on my PNC, I am due in court
maybe tomorrow or this week as my solicitor is putting into court to have a
hearing and I wanted to have any errors on the PNC addressed at court. Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcomermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 13:48 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Staff will be searching for the requested Registers from tomorrow. We
will contact you as soon as this is done. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner
Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 13:22 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I was wondering if there were any updates as to the data, I have asked
for so that I can check cases against my PNC file. Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 21 February 2014 16:06 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell 88, The records you request are at another court. We will begin searching
for them next week when the court is open. Regards, Customer Services Unit Administration Officer Highbury Corner
Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 20 February 2014 12:29 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Hello I do understand that most of the items listed in my emails are
archived due to their date but as I can see errors in the dates of some of
the things and I know this as fact I would like all items checked that is
listed so that it can be checked against the PNC records, I have got the
printout from. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 20 February 2014 12:14 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Further to the conversation between Mrs Cordell and a member of staff
yesterday, please specify which dates and offences you wish us to check.
Almost all the offences are archived and not immediately accessible using the
computer; specific dates and offences would help reduce the delay in
providing this information. Regards, Customer Services Unit 89, Administration Office Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually,
nor to make representations or other statements which r bind the Ministry of
Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 19 February 2014 13:36 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Mr. Simon Paul Cordell 109 Burncroft Road Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ 18/02/2014 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email as I have an ongoing case at Woolwich Crown
Court, and I have noticed some errors in my PNC record which the police
printed of at around 25/06/2013. I would be very grateful if you can pull up the following records so I
can check them with the PNC the police printed off for the case that is
ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court, I have been told I will need a Memorandum of
conviction or the transcript for the case. I do know there are some errors on the cases that was heard at Enfield
Magistrates and can see them clearly, but due to how far they go back cannot
remember some of the cases. I do also know some are correct but due to some
dates being wrong on some of the ones I can see errors in I would like to
check all the cases on the PNC that was heard at Enfield Magistrates. If this can be done as a matter of urgency due to the impact this is
having on my life with the case that is ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court and
my bail and other issues. If the information could be emailed to me, I would be grateful as I am
next in court on March 2014 and would like this information of any
errors so I can show the judge. Please see below the lists of cases I would like information on. 90,
End of Picture! 91,
End of Picture! 92,
End of Picture! 93,
End of Picture! 94, organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by 95, Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your
organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 96, This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 17. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 17 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.13.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 13/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 97,98,99,100,101,102 103,104,105,106,107,108 109,110,111 -- 98 -- From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ [mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 12 March 2014 12:04
To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Ø Our colleague is
searching for the files now: Ø I will send
whatever she finds today. Ø She will be
continuing to search for files tomorrow also. Regards, Customer Services
Unit Highbury Corner
Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither
authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make
representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in
any way via electronic means. |
|||||
|
17. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.13.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 13/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 97,98,99,100,101,102 103,104,105,106,107,108 109,110,111 PNC |
13/03/2014 |
14:10:00 |
X15 97,98,99,100 101,102,103,104 105,106,107,108 109,110,111, |
||
|
18. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.13.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. _001 13/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 112,113,114 115,116,117,118,119,120 121,122,123,124,125,126 PNC |
13/03/2014 |
13:12:00 |
X15 112 113,114,115,116 117,118,119,120 121,122,123,124 125,126, |
||
|
19. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.13.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. _002 13/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 127,128,129,130,131,132 133,134,135,136,137,138 139 PNC |
13/03/2014 |
12:27:00 |
X13 127,128 129,130,131,132 133,134,135,136 137,138,139, |
||
|
17. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 17 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.13.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. 13/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 97,98,99,100,101,102 103,104,105,106,107,108 109,110,111 -- 97, From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 13 March 2014 14:10 To: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: Ø
Could you
please email them to this address if possible? Ø
Or would
it please be possible for my mum to attend Enfield Court and pick the data
up. Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 13 March 2014 13:04 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, A number of the registers have been located and
they are being copied now. We will send them by post tomorrow to the address
given by you in a previous e-mail: Mr. Simon Paul Cordell 109 Burncroft Road Enfield
Middlesex EN3 7JQ The age and quality of the register entries is
such that scanning, and e-mailing is not a viable option. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice
contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind
the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. 98, From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 13 March 2014 12:27 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am sorry to keep emailing you, but I still have not had any emails
with the data I have asked for. Can you please get back to me with what is going on? Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ [mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 12 March 2014 12:04 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Our colleague is searching for the files now: I
will send whatever she finds today. She will be continuing to search for files
tomorrow also. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 12 March 2014 11:59 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this to see if there is any news as to the data I asked
for. I was hoping to have got an email yesterday with some information due to
the email you sent me on the 10/02/2014 but I did not. I understand
that the court is only open Tuesday to Thursday which only give till tomorrow
as you are aware, I am back in court on the 18/03/2014 which if I do
not get anything by tomorrow, I will have to go into court then with nothing
as the court would be closed. Could you therefore let me know if the data I
have asked for will be available by tomorrow? 99, Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcomermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 March 2014 12:59 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, As confirmed to Mrs Cordell last week, a member of
staff at Tottenham Magistrates Court will research the Registers listed and
copies will be sent, by e-mail, to you as we recover them. The Court opens
Tuesday to Thursday: we hope to have at least some of the records for you
tomorrow. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 10 March 2014 12:43 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email to see if there is any update to the
information that I have asked for. Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 04 March 2014 15:23 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell 100, Staff are looking for the records at Enfield
Magistrates Court this week; however, we will not have them for tomorrow
morning. We will endeavour to have as many as possible before Thursday. If
there are specific dates you needed particularly, these could be accessed first. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner
Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 04 March 2014 15:08 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am wondering if there is any update, as I am in Woolwich Crown Court
tomorrow and as said I wanted the information before I went to court. Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 14:39 To: 'GL-HCORNERMCENQ' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: After your email dated the 21/02/2014 I was thinking that you
would be searching for the data from the week of the 24/02/2014 as
this is what it said in the email. As I said in my 1st email when asking for
the information, I have a case that is at Woolwich crown court and I am
having problems with my bail due to the records on my PNC, I am due in court
maybe tomorrow or this week as my solicitor is putting into court to have a
hearing and I wanted to have any errors on the PNC addressed at court. Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 13:48 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' 101, Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Staff will be searching for the requested Registers from tomorrow. We
will contact you as soon as this is done. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner
Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 13:22 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I was wondering if there were any updates as to the data, I have asked
for so that I can check cases against my PNC file. Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 21 February 2014 16:06 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, The records you request are at another court. We will begin searching
for them next week when the court is open. Regards, Customer Services Unit Administration Officer
Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 102, Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 20 February 2014 12:29 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Hello I do understand that most of the items listed in my emails are
archived due to their date but as I can see errors in the dates of some of
the things and I know this as fact I would like all items checked that is
listed so that it can be checked against the PNC records, I have got the
printout from. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 20 February 2014 12:14 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Further to the conversation between Mrs Cordell
and a member of staff yesterday, please specify which dates and offences you
wish us to check. Almost all the offences are archived and not immediately
accessible using the computer; specific dates and offences would help reduce
the delay in providing this information. Regards, Customer Services Unit Administration Office
Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice
contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may 103, bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via
electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 19 February 2014 13:36 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Mr. Simon Paul Cordell 109 Burncroft Road Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ 18/02/2014 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email as I have an ongoing case at Woolwich Crown
Court, and I have noticed some errors in my PNC record which the police
printed of at around 25/06/2013. I would be very grateful if you can pull up the following records so I
can check them with the PNC the police printed off for the case that is
ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court, I have been told I will need a Memorandum of
conviction or the transcript for the case. I do know there are some errors on the cases that was heard at Enfield
Magistrates and can see them clearly, but due to how far they go back cannot
remember some of the cases. I do also know some are correct but due to some
dates being wrong on some of the ones I can see errors in I would like to
check all the cases on the PNC that was heard at Enfield Magistrates. If this can be done as a matter of urgency due to the impact this is
having on my life with the case that is ongoing at Woolwich Crown Court and
my bail and other issues. If the information could be emailed to me, I would be grateful as I am
next in court on March 2014 and would like this information of any
errors so I can show the judge. Please see below the lists of cases I would like information on. 104,
End of Picture! 105,
End of Picture! 106,
End of Picture! 107,
End of Picture! 108, organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications
via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by 109, Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your
organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 110, This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 111, This email was received from the INTERNET and
scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 18. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 18 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.13.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. _001 13/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 112,113,114 115,116,117,118,119,120 121,122,123,124,125,126 -- 112, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 13 March 2014 13:12 To: 'GL-HCORNERMCENQ' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: Ø
Could you please
email them to this address if possible? Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 13 March 2014 13:04 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, A number of the registers have been located and
they are being copied now. We will send them by post tomorrow to the address
given by you in a previous e-mail: Mr. Simon Paul Cordell 109 Burncroft Road Enfield
Middlesex EN3 7JQ The age and quality of the register entries is
such that scanning, and e-mailing is not a viable option. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. 113, From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 13 March 2014 12:27 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am sorry to keep emailing you, but I still have not had any emails
with the data I have asked for. Can you please get back to me with what is
going on? Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 12 March 2014 12:04 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Our colleague is searching for the files now: I
will send whatever she finds today. She will be continuing to search for
files tomorrow also. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 12 March 2014 11:59 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this to see if there is any news as to the data I asked
for. I was hoping to have got an email yesterday with some information due to
the email you sent me on the 10/02/2014 but I did not. I understand that the
court is only open Tuesday to Thursday which only give till tomorrow as you
are aware, I am back in court on the 18/03/2014 which if I do not get
anything by tomorrow, I will have to go into court then with nothing as the
court would be closed. Could you therefore let me know if the data I have
asked for will be available by tomorrow? Regards 114, Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcomermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 March 2014 12:59 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, As confirmed to Mrs Cordell last week, a member
of staff at Tottenham Magistrates Court will research the Registers listed
and copies will be sent, by e-mail, to you as we recover them. The Court
opens Tuesday to Thursday: we hope to have at least some of the records for
you tomorrow. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 March 2014 12:43 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email to see if there is any update to the
information that I have asked for. Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 04 March 2014 15:23 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell 115, Staff are looking for the records at Enfield Magistrates
Court this week; however, we will not have them for tomorrow morning. We will
endeavour to have as many as possible before Thursday. If there are specific
dates you needed particularly, these could be accessed first. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner
Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually,
nor to make representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry
of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 04 March 2014 15:08 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am wondering if there is any update, as I am in Woolwich Crown Court
tomorrow and as said I wanted the information before I went to court. Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 14:39 To: 'GL-HCORNERMCENQ' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: After your email dated the 21/02/2014 I was thinking that you would be
searching for the data from the week of the 24/02/2014 as this is what it
said in the email. As I said in my 1st email when asking for the information,
I have a case that is at Woolwich crown court and I am having problems with
my bail due to the records on my PNC, I am due in court maybe tomorrow or
this week as my solicitor is putting into court to have a hearing and I wanted
to have any errors on the PNC addressed at court. Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 13:48 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' 116, Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Staff will be searching for the requested Registers from tomorrow. We
will contact you as soon as this is done. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner
Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice
contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind
the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 March 2014 13:22 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I was wondering if there were any updates as to the data, I have asked
for so that I can check cases against my PNC file. Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 21 February 2014 16:06 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, The records you request are at another court. We will begin searching
for them next week when the court is open. Regards, Customer Services Unit Administration Officer
Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 19. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 19 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.13.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. _002 13/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 127,128,129,130,131,132 133,134,135,136,137,138 139 -- 127, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 13 March 2014 12:27 To: 'GL-HCORNERMCENQ' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am sorry to keep
emailing you, but I still have not had any emails with the data I have asked
for. Ø
Can you please get
back to me with what is going on? Regards Simon Cordell From: GL-HCORNERMCENQ mailto: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 12 March 2014 12:04 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. Dear Mr Cordell, Our colleague is searching for the files now: I
will send whatever she finds today. She will be continuing to search for
files tomorrow also. Regards, Customer Services Unit Highbury Corner Magistrates Court Tel: 0207-506 3100 Fax: 0870 739 5768 e-mail: GL-HCORNERMCENQ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk I am neither authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 12 March 2014 11:59 To: GL-HCORNERMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Errors on Cases. To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this to see if there is any news as to the data I asked
for. I was hoping to have got an email yesterday with some information due to
the email you sent me on the 10/02/2014 but I did not. I understand that the
court is only open Tuesday to Thursday which only give till tomorrow as you
are aware, I am back in court on the 18/03/2014 which if I do not get
anything by tomorrow, I will have to go into court then with nothing as the
court would be closed. Could you therefore let me know if the data I have
asked for will be available by tomorrow? 128, |
|||||
|
|
|
14/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
20. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.25.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Logbook 25/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 140,141,142,143,144 2 ·
Added from 31 March 2014 13:53 From:
Lorraine
Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent:
25 March 2014 11:40 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Logbook Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance! 1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 229.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Logbook_ (1) / Page Numbers: 540 Brixton
Case / Met Police! Broadsure
Insurance! |
25/03/2014 |
11:40:00 |
X5 140 141,142,143,144 |
||
|
20. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 20 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.25.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Logbook 25/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 140,141,142,143,144 -=- 140, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 25 March 2014 11:40 To: Martin Jenkin Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Logbook Attachments: CX52JRZ-logbook-full.pdf Dear Martin Ø Here is the logbook for CX52JRZ please see attached. Ø I did call DVLA after I got the letter from them which
showed the spelling of the last name wrong as it was spelled Cardell and not
Cordell, they told me I had to wait until the logbook come in the post and
then to fill in section 6 to get it corrected. Ø Which I will be doing. Ø Also, I have also noticed today when the logbook came in
the post and I am not sure why they have put the new keepers date as 15/02/2014 as the green slip section 10 was sent to them, so the
date of the 10/11/2013 Ø was on it so I will be writing a letter to ask why this
was done, along with the section 6 to correct the last name. Could you please
update us as to when this can be sorted with KGM as to the claim that is
against Simon so he can sort his insurance out. Ø Also, about the claim for 09 Dec 2013 Ø we still have not heard from KGM as to when someone will
be sent out to take a report from Simon could this be looked into? Ø And also, I know there was some confusion as to the
number that was called to report this on the 09 Dec 2013 Ø please see the below information from my phone bill Mon
09 Dec 13:28 SPEC SERV 08444126412 22:00 The call was made to 08444126412 at
13:28 and lasted 22 min this is when Simon called to report what had happened
on the 09/12/2013 and give all the information which the person noted. Ø I know there is some issue as to the lady who witnessed
this information being missing but it was all given on this call. Ø If it can be possible can someone get the tape for this
call and get the information to the witness so KGM can contact her about what
she saw and who was at fault. Lorraine 141, Copy of my Driving license! 142, Copy of my Driving license! 143, Copy of my Driving license! 144, Copy of my Driving license! 1. Added from 31 March 2014 13:53 From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 25 March 2014 11:40 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Logbook Dear Martin Ø
Here is the logbook for CX52JRZ
please see attached. Ø
I did call DVLA after I got the
letter from them which showed the spelling of the last name wrong as it was
spelled Cardell and not Cordell, they told me I had to wait until the logbook
come in the post and then to fill in section 6 to get it corrected. Ø
Which I will be doing. Ø
Also, I have also noticed today
when the logbook came in the post and I am not sure why they have put the new
keepers date as 15/02/2014 as the green slip section
10 was sent to them, so the date of the 10/11/2013 Ø
was on it so I will be writing a
letter to ask why this was done, along with the section 6 to correct the last
name. Could you please update us as to when this can be sorted with KGM as to
the claim that is against Simon so he can sort his insurance out. Ø
Also, about the claim for 09 Dec 2013 Ø
we still have not heard from
KGM as to when someone will be sent out to take a report from Simon could
this be looked into? Ø
And also, I know there was some
confusion as to the number that was called to report this on the 09 Dec 2013 Ø
please see the below
information from my phone bill Mon 09 Dec 13:28 SPEC SERV 08444126412 22:00
The call was made to 08444126412 at 13:28 and lasted 22 min this is when
Simon called to report what had happened on the 09/12/2013 and
give all the information which the person noted. Ø
I know there is some issue as
to the lady who witnessed this information being missing but it was all given
on this call. Ø
If it can be possible can
someone get the tape for this call and get the information to the witness so
KGM can contact her about what she saw and who was at fault. Lorraine 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 229. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Logbook_ (1) / Page Numbers: 540, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 25 March 2014 11:40 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Logbook Attachments: CX52JRZlogbookfull.pdf Dear Martin Ø
Here is the logbook for CX52JRZ
please see attached. Ø
I did call DVLA after I got the
letter from them which showed the spelling of the last name wrong as it was
spelled Cardell and not Cordell, they told me I had to wait until the logbook
come in the post and then to fill in section 6 to get it corrected. Ø
Which I will be doing. Ø
Also, I have also noticed today
when the logbook came in the post and I am not sure why they have put the new
keepers date as 15/02/2014 as the green slip section
10 was sent to them, so the date of the 10/11/2013 Ø
was on it so I will be writing
a letter to ask why this was done, along with the section 6 to correct the
last name. Could you please update us as to when this can be sorted with KGM
as to the claim that is against Simon so he can sort his insurance out. Ø
Also, about the claim for 09 Dec 2013 Ø
we still have not heard from
KGM as to when someone will be sent out to take a report from Simon could
this be looked into? Ø
And also, I know there was some
confusion as to the number that was called to report this on the 09 Dec 2013 Ø
please see the below
information from my phone bill Mon 09 Dec 13:28 SPEC SERV 08444126412 22:00
The call was made to 08444126412 at 13:28 and lasted 22 min this is when
Simon called to report what had happened on the 09/12/2013 and
give all the information which the person noted. Ø
I know there is some issue as
to the lady who witnessed this information being missing but it was all given
on this call. Ø
If it can be possible can
someone get the tape for this call and get the information to the witness so
KGM can contact her about what she saw and who was at fault. Lorraine |
|||||
|
21. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 21 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.26.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Logbook 26/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 145 1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 232. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell Logbook / Page Numbers: 543 Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
26/03/2014 |
17:54:00 |
X1 145 |
||
|
21. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 21 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.26.2014_RE Simon Cordell
Logbook 26/03/2014 / Page Numbers: 145 -- 145 From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 26 March 2014 17:54 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Logbook Hi Martin Ø
Is it all possible
to get an update? Ø
I am losing money due
to not having insurance and not being able to drive. Ø
You said you would
get back to me today and I have not heard anything. Simon From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 25 March 2014 11:40 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Logbook Dear Martin Ø
Here is the logbook for CX52JRZ
please see attached. Ø
I did call DVLA after I got the
letter from them which showed the spelling of the last name wrong as it was
spelled Cardell and not Cordell, they told me I had to wait until the logbook
come in the post and then to fill in section 6 to get it corrected. Ø
Which I will be doing. Ø
Also, I have also noticed today
when the logbook came in the post and I am not sure why they have put the new
keepers date as 15/02/2014 as the green slip section
10 was sent to them, so the date of the 10/11/2013 Ø
was on it so I will be writing
a letter to ask why this was done, along with the section 6 to correct the
last name. Could you please update us as to when this can be sorted with KGM
as to the claim that is against Simon so he can sort his insurance out. Ø
Also, about the claim for 09 Dec 2013 Ø
we still have not heard from
KGM as to when someone will be sent out to take a report from Simon could
this be looked into? Ø
And also, I know there was some
confusion as to the number that was called to report this on the 09 Dec 2013 Ø
please see the below
information from my phone bill Mon 09 Dec 13:28 SPEC SERV 08444126412 22:00
The call was made to 08444126412 at 13:28 and lasted 22 min this is when
Simon called to report what had happened on the 09/12/2013 and
give all the information which the person noted. Ø
I know there is some issue as
to the lady who witnessed this information being missing but it was all given
on this call. Ø
If it can be possible can
someone get the tape for this call and get the information to the witness so
KGM can contact her about what she saw and who was at fault. Lorraine 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 232. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Logbook / Page Numbers: 543, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 26
March 2014 17:54 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Logbook Hi Martin Ø
Is it all possible to get an
update? Ø
I am losing money due to not
having insurance and not being able to drive? Ø
You said you would get back to
me today and I have not heard anything. Simon From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 25 March 2014 11:40 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Logbook Dear Martin Ø
Here is the logbook for CX52JRZ
please see attached. Ø
I did call DVLA after I got the
letter from them which showed the spelling of the last name wrong as it was
spelled Cardell and not Cordell, they told me I had to wait until the logbook
come in the post and then to fill in section 6 to get it corrected. Ø
Which I will be doing. Ø
Also, I have also noticed today
when the logbook came in the post and I am not sure why they have put the new
keepers date as 15/02/2014 as the green slip section
10 was sent to them, so the date of the 10/11/2013 Ø
was on it so I will be writing
a letter to ask why this was done, along with the section 6 to correct the
last name. Could you please update us as to when this can be sorted with KGM
as to the claim that is against Simon so he can sort his insurance out. Ø
Also, about the claim for 09 Dec 2013 Ø
we still have not heard from
KGM as to when someone will be sent out to take a report from Simon could
this be looked into? Ø
And also, I know there was some
confusion as to the number that was called to report this on the 09 Dec 2013 Ø
please see the below
information from my phone bill Mon 09 Dec 13:28 SPEC SERV 08444126412 22:00
The call was made to 08444126412 at 13:28 and lasted 22 min this is when
Simon called to report what had happened on the 09/12/2013 and
give all the information which the person noted. Ø
I know there is some issue as
to the lady who witnessed this information being missing but it was all given
on this call. Ø
If it can be possible can
someone get the tape for this call and get the information to the witness so
KGM can contact her about what she saw and who was at fault. Lorraine |
|||||
|
|
|
27/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 ·
Added from 31 March 2014 13:53 From: Paul McNally [Mail To: p.mcnally@aaconline.co.uk] On Behalf Of + Southend
Claims Sent: 28 March 2014 15:34 Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
28/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
Added from 31 March 2014 13:53 From: Paul McNally [Mail To: p.mcnally@aaconline.co.uk] On Behalf Of + Southend
Claims Sent: 28 March 2014 15:34 To: Martin Jenkin Subject: RE: [1] Simon Cordell REG CX52JRX
Claim Reference A27/2013/190530 Ø Good afternoon Ø Many thanks for the V5 now received, however the details
therein do not tally with the insurance nor the sales and purchase receipts submitted
by the policyholder as such we are at this time unable to close the
file. Ø We will however pass the evidence to hand onto the third
party and request confirmation that they will redirect their claim, failing
which we will insist that they obtain judgement on the driver of the vehicle
at the time of the alleged incident. Ø As the vehicle was never removed from the policy and the
DVLA history does not tie in with the purchase/sales history submitted we are
left with a possible involvement as the RTA Insurer which remains a
contentious issue, as the V5 shows the owner from 06/02/2012 to 15/02/2014 Ø as Adam Harris, with the inception of this insurance
policy being 23/02/2013 for the vehicle and our
mutual client/policyholder. Ø We trust the above is of assistance. Paul
McNally | Technical Claims Handler Auto Accident Claims on behalf of KGM
Insurance | Sure land House | Journeyman’s Way | Southend on Sea | SS2 5TF Tel: 01702 444381 Fax: 01702 461508 Accident
Management You Can Rely On Please
visit our website at - www.autoaccidentclaims.co.uk |
|||||
|
|
|
29/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 238. Martin Jenkin RE_
[1] Simon Cordell Logbook / Page Numbers: 791,792 Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
31/03/2014 |
|
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 238. Martin Jenkin RE_ [1]
Simon Cordell Logbook /
Page Numbers: 791,792, From:
Martin
Jenkin [martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent:
31
March 2014 13:53 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject:
RE: [1]
Simon Cordell Logbook Hi
Lorraine, Ø Please find attached the response I have received from
Claims, From: Paul McNally [Mail To: p.mcnally@aaconline.co.uk] On Behalf Of + Southend Claims Sent: 28 March 2014 15:34 To: Martin Jenkin Subject: RE: [1]
Simon Cordell REG CX52JRX Claim Reference A27/2013/190530 Good afternoon Many thanks for the V5 now received,
however the details therein do not tally with the insurance nor the sales and
purchase receipts submitted by the policyholder as such we are at this time
unable to close the file. We will
however pass the evidence to hand onto the third party and request
confirmation that they will redirect their claim, failing which we will
insist that they obtain judgement on the driver of the vehicle at the time of
the alleged incident. As the vehicle
was never removed from the policy and the DVLA history does not tie in with
the purchase/sales history submitted we are left with a possible involvement
as the RTA Insurer which remains a contentious issue, as the V5 shows the
owner from 06/02/2012 To 15/02/2014 as Adam Harris, with the inception of
this insurance policy being 23/02/2013 for the vehicle and our mutual
client/policyholder. We trust the
above is of assistance. Paul McNally |
Technical Claims Handler Auto Accident Claims on behalf of KGM Insurance |
Sureland House | Journeyman’s Way | Southend on Sea | SS2 5TF Tel: 01702 444381 Fax: 01702 461508 1*r„1cid: image00 Accident Management You Can Rely On Please visit our website at - www.autoaccidentclaims.co.uk From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 26 March 2014 17:54 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Logbook Hi Martin Is it all possible to get an update I am losing money due to not
having insurance and not being able to drive? You said you would get back to
me today and I have not heard anything. 792, Simon From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 25 March 2014 11:40 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Logbook Dear Martin Here is the logbook for CX52JRZ please
see attached. I did call DVLA after I got the letter from them which showed
the spelling of the last name wrong as it was spelled Cardell and not
Cordell, they told me I had to wait until the logbook come in the post and
then to fill in section 6 to get it corrected. Which I will be doing. Also, I
have also noticed today when the logbook came in the post and I am not sure
why they have put the new keepers date as 15/02/2014 as the green slip section 10 was sent
to them, so the date of the 10/11/2013 was on it so I will be writing a letter
to ask why this was done, along with the section 6 to correct the last
name. Could you please update us as to
when this can be sorted with KGM as to the claim that is against Simon so he
can sort his insurance out. Also, about the claim for 09 Dec 2013 we still have not heard from KGM as to
when someone will be sent out to take a report from Simon could this be
looked into? And also, I know there was some
confusion as to the number that was called to report this on the 09 Dec 2013 please see the below information from
my phone bill Mon 09 Dec13:28 SPEC SERV 08444126412 22:00 The call was made
to 08444126412 at 13:28 and lasted 22 min this is when Simon called to report
what had happened on the 09/12/2013 and give all the information which the
person noted. I know there is some issue as to the lady who witnessed this
information being missing but it was all given on this call. If it can be
possible can someone get the tape for this call and get the information to the
witness so KGM can contact her about what she saw and who was at fault. Lorraine |
|||||
Simulation April 2014 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
April 2014 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 290. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ [1] Simon Cordell Logbook / Page Numbers: 811,812,813,814 Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
08/04/2014 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 290. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
[1] Simon Cordell Logbook /
Page Numbers: 811,812,813,814, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 08 April 2014 19:14 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: [1] Simon Cordell Logbook Dear
Martin Ø After the call I made to you today and what we spoke
about please see the email that you asked me to write. As said on the phone
today and as you are well aware Simon did not think any Vehicles was on the
database and had to carry his policy around from the start of his policy with
KGM as each time he was pulled by police nothing showed as him being insured,
so as you are aware the police and Simon had to call you many times when
Simon was pulled by police to confirm with the police that he was in fact
insured. Ø So as to what the claims department are saying about the
Vehicle being on the database how was Simon have meant to know about this to
have called to take off any Vehicles? Ø Simon did not know there was an error on the database
due to it being inputted wrong on the database form, so it was showing up on
the insurance database but not he mid database due to this error, so how was
he meant to be aware of this fact. Ø He was only made aware of this in late November 2013 Ø when some issues came up that Kelly Tiller of KGM was
dealing with. It was at this point his car started showing up on the mid so
KGM had fixed this, but no other Vehicles, was showing up on the mid database
until it was corrected in Jan 2013 by KGM. Ø I do believe now it was something to do with a space
being placed within the numbers of the reg of the Vehicles, the insurance
database accepts this, but the mid database does not. Ø But this is documented well in emails. Ø Also why has KGM never sent me any letters of this claim
being held against me? Ø there was a call from KGM about the Sep 2013 but I
told the person who called I did not own the Van at that time I was asked to
send in the bill of sale and I did, after this I did not hear anything else
about this so was thinking everything was ok until it was time for my renewal
it was only at this point I was told about this claim being on my insurance,
It is also well known you have my mums phone number which is on file which is
0208 245 7454 and there is always someone at home so if there was any issues
why no phone calls or any letters about this? Ø But also, I am sure there should have been a letter sent
about this claim and there have never been any letters sent. Ø There are some more issues and that is the claim for Dec 2013 Ø when Simon was taking my car to service it. Ø As you are aware KGM even said Simon was not covered by
his trade policy and you had to call them and sort this issue out. Ø But that still does not cover the fact Simon has made
many calls and also sent emails about this claim. Ø Which we still have not heard anything back about also
there has been no letters sent about this claim also. Ø The last time he called he was told that someone would
be sent out to take a report for this claim yet again there have been no
phone calls or letters to set this up so a report can be taken. Ø There is also a problem that on the 09/12/2013 Ø when he called to report this, he gave over a witness
information IE Name and her phone number which on the last call that was made
they did not seem to have any information as to the witness information I
have checked my phone bill and the call was made please see below. 812, Ø Mon 09 Dec 13:28 SPEC SERV 08444126412 22:00 Ø The call was made to 08444126412 at 13:28 and lasted 22
min this is when Simon called to report what had happened on the 09/12/2013 and give all the information which the person noted. Ø I have asked for the recoding of the phone call be
pulled out and heard so that the information as to the witness can be put on
this claim and contacted yet I have heard nothing also. Ø I have asked and emailed many times about this claim and
it seems nothing has been done but yet KGM wants to hold this claim also
against my insurance. Ø There is also the fact on the 26/11/2013 an
email was sent to Kelly Tiller at KGM about a subject access request under
the data protection act 1998 again I have heard nothing about this, and more
emails have been sent over about this. Ø Please can these issued be addressed I paid for my
insurance and it seems that nothing gets done it does not matter how many
times calls are made or emails are sent KGM are just leaving everything. Ø How long should it take to sort out a claim? Ø Should I have had at least a letter? Ø Why has nothing been addressed? Ø As at this time due to these claims I cannot work, and
this is costing me money every day I am not insured. Regards From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To:martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 31 March 2014 13:53 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: [1]
Simon Cordell Logbook Hi Lorraine, Please find attached the response I
have received from Claims, From: Paul McNally [Mail To: p.mcnally@aaconline.co.uk] On Behalf Of + Southend Claims Sent: 28 March 2014 15:34 To: Martin Jenkin Subject: RE: [1]
Simon Cordell REG CX52JRX Claim Reference A27/2013/190530 Good afternoon Many thanks for the V5 now received,
however the details therein do not tally with the insurance nor the sales and
purchase receipts submitted by the policyholder as such we are at this time
unable to close the file. We will however pass the evidence to hand onto the
third party and request confirmation that they will redirect their claim,
failing which we will insist that they obtain judgement on the driver of the
vehicle at the time of the alleged incident. As the vehicle was never removed
from the policy and the DVLA history does not tie in with the purchase/sales
history submitted we are left with a possible involvement as the RTA Insurer
which remains a contentious issue, as the V5 shows the owner from 06/02/2012 To 15/02/2014 as Adam Harris, with the inception of
this insurance policy being 23/02/2013 for the vehicle and our mutual client/policyholder. 813,814, |
||||
|
|
|
09/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 299. Martin Jenkin
returning your call / Page Numbers: 829 Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
14/04/2014 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 299. Martin Jenkin returning
your call /
Page Numbers: 829, From:
Martin
Jenkin [martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent:
14
April 2014 15:55 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject:
returning
your call Ø Please could you give me a call... Regards
Martin
Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 (t:
01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843 594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This
e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the
person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and
confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must
not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible
and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the
right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. |
||||
|
|
|
15/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/04/2014 |
|
|
|
22. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 22 martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com_04.17.2014_ 17/04/2014 / Page Numbers: 146,147,148 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 305. Martin Jenkin_ / Page Numbers: 842 Brixton
Case / Met Police! Broadsure
Insurance! |
17/04/2014 |
18:44:00 |
X3 146,147,148 |
|
|
22. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 22 martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com_04.17.2014_ 17/04/2014 / Page Numbers:
146,147,148 -- 146, From: Martin Jenkin martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com> Sent: 17 April 2014 18:44 To: Lorraine Cordell Attachments: Cordell Cover
note.pdf Regards Martin Jenkin DDI
01843 598744 Broadsure direct INSURANCE INTERMEDIARY t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct - Telephone
number: 01843 594477 - Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is
strictly confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to
whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information
and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or
take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please
note that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail
communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. 147, Temporary Motor Insurance
Cover Note Number! 148, Temporary Motor Insurance
Cover Note Number! 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 305. Martin Jenkin_ / Page Numbers: 842, From: Martin Jenkin [martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 17 April 2014 18:44 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Attachments: Cordell
Cover note.pdf Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 cid: image001.png@01CC9FAC. t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct - Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax Number: 01843
594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as
soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and
reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our
network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial
Conduct Authority. |
||||
|
|
|
18/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
27/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/04/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/04/2014 |
|
|
Simulation May 2014 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
May
2014 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/05/2014 |
|
|
|
Simon had a letter from
policy plan saying they were cancelling his policy the letter was dated 12/05/2014 and they said they were
cancelling seven days from the date of their letter. Not sure as to why as when
Simon got your letter dated the 06/05/2014 we sent the documents you
asked for to policy plan. Please see attached documents which were posted
to policy plan. Could you please see as to the? reason as why they are
cancelling his policy please? Regards Simon claim which was given on the
phone to KGM on the 09/12/2013, where Simon was driving my
car to service it the Rover Reg Y311 FVV. |
06/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
Simon had a letter from
policy plan saying they were cancelling his policy the letter was dated 12/05/2014 and they said they were
cancelling seven days from the date of their letter. Not sure as to why as when
Simon got your letter dated the 06/05/2014 we sent the documents you
asked for to policy plan. Please see attached documents which were posted
to policy plan. Could you please see as to the? reason as why they are
cancelling his policy please? Regards Simon claim which was given on the
phone to KGM on the 09/12/2013, where Simon was driving my
car to service it the Rover Reg Y311 FVV. |
12/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/05/2014 |
|
|
|
23. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 23 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_05.15.2014_RE Policy-Simon-Cordell 15/05/2014 / Page Numbers:149,150 151,152,153,154,155,156 157,158,159,160,161,162 163,164,165 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 309. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Policy-Simon-Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 855 Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
15/05/2014 |
13:04:00 |
X17 149,150,151,152 153,154,155,156 157,158,159,160 161,162,163,164 165, |
|
|
23. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 23 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_05.15.2014_RE
Policy-Simon-Cordell 15/05/2014 / Page Numbers:149,150 151,152,153,154,155,156 157,158,159,160,161,162 163,164,165 -- 149, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 15 May 2014 13:04 To: Martin Jenkin Subject: RE:
Policy-Simon-Cordell Attachments: Statement-of-facts.pdf 36980126-Mr Ian
Robinson.doc 36980127-Miss M
Stavros.doc 36980128-Miss L
Cordell.doc Policy-plan-letter-dated-12-05-2014.pdf Simon-Driving
Licence-Card-Back.jpg Simon- Driving
Licence-Card-Front (1).jpg Simon-Driving
Licence-Front-Back.pdf Hi Martin Ø Simon had a letter
from policy plan saying they were cancelling his policy the letter was dated 12/05/2014
and they said they were cancelling seven days from the date of their
letter. Ø Not sure as to why
as when Simon got your letter dated the 06/05/2014 we sent the
documents you asked for to policy plan. Please see attached documents which
were posted to policy plan. Ø Could you please
see as to the reason as why they are cancelling his policy please? Regards Simon 150, Broadsure Direct 4th Floor, Argyle Centre York
Street Ramsgate Kent CT11 9DS Telephone :0J 843 594477 Fax :01843 594488 facts.pdf Policyholder: Mr Simon Cordell Policy ref: COSX14MT05 STATEMENT OF FACT (vl.02) Ø
Please note that the
documents enclosed relate to a "Statement of Fact" insurance
policy. Ø
This means that
Broadsure Direct have prepared the documentation on your behalf, based on the
information provided by you. Ø
It is vitally
important that you check all the enclosed documentation to ensure that it is
correct and that the policy meets your requirements. Ø
Please complete
& return declaration below within seven days. Ø
I have checked the
Statement of Fact and all related documentation that the information is
correct, and the policy meets my requirements. Print I UNDERSTAND THAT SHOULD ANY
OF THE INFORMATION WITHIN THIS STATEMENT BE INCORRECT, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILTY
TO CONTACT BROADSURE DIRECT IMMEDIATELY ON 01843 594477 AND OBTAIN
CONFIRMATION THAT THESE AMENDMENTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. 151, Motor trade documents! 152, Motor trade documents! 153, Motor trade documents! 154, Motor trade documents! 155, Motor trade documents! 156, Motor trade documents! 157, Motor trade documents! 158, Motor trade documents! 159, Motor trade documents! 160, Motor trade documents! 161, Motor trade documents! 162, Motor trade documents! 163, Motor trade documents! 164, Motor trade documents! 165, Motor trade documents! 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 309. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Policy-Simon-Cordell_ (1) /
Page Numbers: 855, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 May 2014 13:04 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Policy Simon Cordell Attachments: Statement _of _facts. Pdf 36980126Mr
Ian Robinson.doc 36980127Miss
M Stavros.doc 36980128MissL
Cordell.doc Policyplanletterdated12052014.pdf Simon
Driving Licence Card Back.jpg Simon
Driving Licence Card Front (1).jpg Simon
Driving Licence Front Back.pdf Hi
Martin Ø Simon had a letter from policy plan saying they were
cancelling his policy the letter was dated 12/05/2014 Ø and they said they were cancelling seven days from the
date of their letter. Ø Not sure as to why as when Simon got your letter dated
the 06/05/2014 Ø we sent the documents you asked for to policy plan. Ø Please see attached documents which were posted to
policy plan. Ø Could you please see as to the reason as why they are
cancelling his policy please? Regards Simon |
||||
|
24. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 24 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_05.16.2014_RE
Policy-Simon-Cordell 16/05/2014 / Page Numbers: 166,167,168 169,170,171,172 1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 310. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Policy-Simon-Cordell / Page Numbers: 857 Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
16/05/2014 |
16:27:00 |
X7 166,167,168 169,170,171,172 |
|
|
24. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 24 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_05.16.2014_RE
Policy-Simon-Cordell 16/05/2014 / Page Numbers: 166,167,168 169,170,171,172 -- 166, From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 16 May 2014 16:27 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE:
Policy-Simon-Cordell Attachments: 36980157-Jamie
Macuire.doc 36980158-L
Cordell.doc 36980160.doc Hi Martin Ø
I got a call today
and was told they needed 3 more invoices which I am sending over now. Ø
I hope the invoices
will not be used for anything as this could cause me trouble under the data
protection law. Regards Simon From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 15 May 2014 13:04 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Policy-Simon-Cordell Hi Martin Simon had a letter from policy plan saying they
were cancelling his policy the letter was dated 12/05/2014 and they said they
were cancelling seven days from the date of their letter. Not sure as to why
as when Simon got your letter dated the 06/05/2014 we sent the documents you
asked for to policy plan. Please see attached documents which were posted to
policy plan. Could you please see as to the reason as why they are cancelling
his policy please? Regards Simon 167, Motor trade documents! 168, Motor trade documents! 169, Motor trade documents! 170, Motor trade documents! 171, Motor trade documents! 172, 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 310. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Policy-Simon-Cordell / Page Numbers: 857, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 16
May 2014 16:27 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Policy
Simon Cordell Attachments: 36980157JamieMacuire.doc 36980158LCordell.doc 36980160SheilaLewis.doc Hi Martin I got a call today and was told they
needed 3 more invoices which I am sending over now. I hope the invoices will
not be used for anything as this could cause me trouble under the data
protection law. Regards Simon From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 May 2014 13:04 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Policy
Simon Cordell Hi Martin Simon had a letter from policy plan
saying they were cancelling his policy the letter was dated 12/05/2014 and they said they were cancelling
seven days from the date of their letter. Not sure as to why as when Simon
got your letter dated the 06/05/2014 we sent the documents you asked for to
policy plan. Please see attached documents which were posted to policy plan.
Could you please see as to the reason as why they are cancelling his policy
please? Regards Simon |
||||
|
|
|
17/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
Dairy striped up to here for sure |
19/05/2014 |
|
|
|
25. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 25 martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com_05.20.2014_FW 20/05/2014 / Page Numbers: 173,174 1 ·
1st Curfew Bromley
Court! Broadsure Insurance! Police
Driving Ban??????? 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 314. Martin Jenkin _Fwd._
/ Page Numbers: 862 Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
20/05/2014 |
18:52:00 |
X2 173,174 |
|
|
25. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 25 martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com_05.20.2014_FW 20/05/2014 / Page Numbers: 173,174 -- 173, From: Martin Jenkin martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 20 May 2014 18:52 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: FW: Attachments: image2014-05-20-184559.pdf 174,
End of Picture! 1 1st Curfew Bromley Court! Bromley 20/05/2014 Ø
Bromley Court -
011401009802 - Bexley Bromley Greenwich Ø
2 case we had to do
statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for Bromley. Ø
The Court case with
the offence date of the 20/05/2014 is as follows: ‐ Ø
South East London
Magistrates' Court Ø
Date of Conviction –
06/11/2014 Ø
Offence – IN10 Ø
Date of Offence – 20/05/2014 Ø
Fine ‐ £600 Ø
Points – 6 Ø
South East London
Magistrates' Court Ø
Bromley Magistrates'
Court - Tracey Bullock Ø
Dated 18/03/2015 Ø
Your driving licence
was revoked due to it not being returned for updating Ø
with the latest
hearing details of the 26/01/2015, Ø
N10 offence Ø
My insurance is not
cheap it is costing me around £1600.00 Ø
Case No: Ø
011401009802 Ø
Bromley Court? 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 314. Martin Jenkin _Fwd._ / Page Numbers: 862, From: Martin Jenkin [martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 20
May 2014 18:52 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: FW: Attachments: image20140520184559.pdf |
||||
|
|
|
21/05/2014 |
|
|
|
26. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 26
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_05.22.2014_Plea-form-011401009802 22/05/2014 / Page Numbers: 175,176,177 1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 315.
Lorraine Cordell_Plea-form-011401009802 / Page Numbers: 863 Bromley
Court – 011401009802 Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank! 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 316.
GL-SWESTERNMCENQ_RE_ Plea-form-011401009802 / Page Numbers: 864 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 317. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ KGM Policy-Simon-Cordell / Page Numbers: 865,866 Bromley
Court – 011401009802 or Brixton Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
22/05/2014 |
14:19:00 |
X3 175,176,177 |
|
|
26. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 26 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_05.22.2014_Plea-form-011401009802 22/05/2014 / Page Numbers: 175,176,177 -- 175, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 22 May 2014 14:19 To: swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Plea-form-011401009802 Attachments: Plea-form-011401009802.pdf To Whom It May
Concern: Please see attached
Plea form for summons dated 16/04/2014 for case number 011401009802 to be
heard on the 28/05/2014. Which I am pleading not guilty to. Could you please
send back an email recipe that you have received my Plea form. Regards Mr Simon Cordell 176,
End of Picture! 177,
End of Picture! 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 315. Lorraine
Cordell_Plea-form-011401009802 /
Page Numbers: 863, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 May 2014 14:19 To: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: Pleaform011401009802 Attachments: Pleaform011401009802.pdf To
Whom It May Concern: Please
see attached Plea form for summons dated 16/04/2014 for case
number 011401009802 to be heard on the 28/05/2014. Which
I am pleading not guilty to. Could you please send back an email recipe that
you have received my Plea form? Regards Mr.
Simon Cordell 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 316. GL-SWESTERNMCENQ_RE_
Plea-form-011401009802 /
Page Numbers: 864, From: GLSWESTERNMCENQ [swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 22 May 2014 14:20 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Pleaform011401009802 Thank
you for your email which has been passed to our correspondence team please be
aware it may have to be referred to our Legal Team and we will respond to you
as soon as possible. This
email (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies
and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure medium.
Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else.
Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response
to this message by email. This email (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content
may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The original
of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded
for legal purposes. 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 317. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
KGM Policy-Simon-Cordell /
Page Numbers: 865,866, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 May 2014 17:28 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: KGM Policy Simon Cordell Attachments: Rewired Our ref_ A27_190530 AX
REF 403050.pdf Dear
martin Ø For the last 3 days Simon and myself have been trying to
sort these 2 claims out with KGM. Ø Many phone calls have been made and all sorts of things
said. Ø Claim dated 14/09/2014 information below Today I
got a call back for the claim dated 14/09/2013 Ø where I asked the lady, I spoke to for the information
for the insurance company that were making the claim, I was also shocked to
hear that they had only today again sent an email to Accident exchange to get
them to redirect the claim, the information is below. Company: Accident exchange Ref: LR4030501 Phone Number: 08700116720 Ø Simon called and spoke to a Mr. Chris Garvin at around
11.50am on the 22/05/2014 Ø Simon was told that they were no longer looking at his
insurance and had not been for some time. Ø That they had redirect there claim to Mr. Harris and all
they were waiting for was for proof of the sale of the index incident
vehicle, CX52 JRZ from KGM and had been waiting for this for some months to
close that part of the claim down for Simon. Ø Simon asked Mr. Chris Garvin if he could email himself
this and also email this again to KGM I will attach the email from Mr. Chris
Garvin with this email for you to see Again it does seem as if KGM are not
doing their job as from what I heard today this claim should have been taken
of my insurance from months ago. Ø Simon again called KGM about this and getting KGM to
send Mr. Chris Garvin the proof of sale and was shocked to hear it would take
KGM 5 days to send this over so that this claim can be closed down. Ø I at this time think KGM has had long enough already to deal
with this matter and due to how long this has taken has messed Simon
insurance up enough already due to KGM not doing their job. Ø This should have been cleared up months ago but KGM is
just holding on to it. Ø Claim dated the 09/12/2013 information below Also
today we have been trying again to sort the claim dated 09/12/2013, Ø where Simon was driving my car to service it the Rover
Reg Y311 FVV. Ø We have been told that the last few weeks they would
send us a form out to fill in to Simon email address re_wired@ymail.com Ø which should be on file when he took the insurance
policy out with KGM. Ø But not getting the form again we called and asked why. Ø They seemed to have had the wrong email so re took it
and said they would send they out yesterday still not having got the email by
today we asked them why we had not got this again they had the wrong email so
again they had to take it. Ø We do now have the form which is a joke in itself to
fill in so I made a call to KGM to get some help as most of the information
also KGM already have, but within the call I was not happy with what Mr. C
Clancy said to me on the phone. Ø They do seem to have the witness information now to the
claim which was given on the phone to KGM on the 09/12/2013 Ø which they in the pass told me they did not have. Mr. C
Clancy had to in the end go and get the file out as there was so much mess on
their system, he needed to see what had been done in the file. Ø They did call Miss Hue who is the witness and got her
email address and they sent her an email on the 05/02/2014, but
since this time, they have not heard from her. Ø I said to Mr. C Clancy with the mess up with Simon email
address and not taking down the correct email does it not seem something is
wrong if Miss Hue was willing to give you her email then why would she not
have filled in the information to ask her for. Ø Why has nothing been following up by calling Miss Hue
and asking. Ø He could not understand why this had not been done. Ø He then went on to try and help me with the form they
had sent over and when he heard I was insured on Y311 FVV he said could I
give him a while for him to read the full file. 866, Ø He came back on the phone and said but why is this claim
not going through my insurance I said why should it as I was not driving it
on the 09/12/2013 it was covered under Simon Trade insurance as he was
taking it to be serviced. Ø At this he said that Simon was not covered to drive my
car to service it under his trade insurance, I told him what the reason was
for having this trade insurance if Simon was not insured. Ø I then went on to say about some months back when I
myself talked to the claim hander Miss Alana Foster and she said this also. Ø And that you had contracted the underwriters and sorted
this out and Simon was in fact insured. Ø He said he was going to have to contract the
underwriters and conform this. Ø At this I was really not happy and told him does your
teams do their work correctly as to me there is no communication between KGM
departments. Ø I told him on the phone I was going to again contract
you and again sort this mess out as if there still saying Simon was not
insured then they sold him the wrong insurance policy. Ø At this he said to me don’t do that just wait till I get
back to you today or tomorrow. Ø There is a lot more that has been said but this is just
a little outline. Ø Sorry Martin there is such a mess with KGM they don’t seem
to know what they are doing and this is having a great effect on Simon life
and more costs due to his insurance costs, and the fact now he has to go to
court around 6 times for no insurance when he was in fact insurance and his
insurance was paid for. Ø you please try to deal with this mess? Ø And take a look at the email that I have attached for
the claim of 14/09/2014 Ø I don’t see why Simon no claims are being withheld due
to KGM not doing their job and also having the new insurance closed due to
this fact and you having to open a new one this is really looking bad on
Simon and he has done nothing wrong here. Ø Also, can I ask something about Simon New insurance does
it cover him for his window screen on his car? Ø Can you please give us an update for all this and sorry
for the long email? Regards Lorraine |
||||
|
|
|
23/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
27/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
Court date PC
Geoghegan Brixton hill. Did not know
about this court date! Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance! |
28/05/2014 |
|
|
|
1 Court date PC Geoghegan Ø Brixton hill. Ø Did not know about
this court date! |
||||
|
|
|
29/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/05/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/05/2014 |
|
|
Simulation June 2014 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
June 2014 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 326. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (61) / Page Numbers: 880, |
02/06/2014 |
|
|
|
3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 326. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (61) /
Page Numbers: 880, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 02 June 2014 20:06 To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi
Josey Ø Is there any update on the DX files coming into the
office? Ø If not can you re email the barrister to get them sent
over, please Regards Lorraine |
||||
|
|
4 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 327. Martin Jenkin _REF_ 00-COSX14MT06
Open Print Manager Documents / Page Numbers: 881 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 5 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 328. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
00-COSX14MT06 Open Print Manager Documents / Page Numbers: 882 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 6 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 329. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (23) / Page Numbers: 883 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
03/06/2014 |
|
|
|
4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 327. Martin Jenkin _REF_
00-COSX14MT06 Open Print Manager Documents /
Page Numbers: 881, From:
Martin
Jenkin martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent:
03
July 2014 10:51 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject:
REF:
00-COSX14MT06 Open Print Manager Documents Attachments: sofdec (COSX14MT06).pdf Ø Please ask Simon to sign and return Regards
Martin
Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 cid: image001.png@01CC9FAC. t:
01843 594477 f:
01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843 594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This
e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the
person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and
confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must
not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible
and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the
right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our network.
Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 328. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
00-COSX14MT06 Open Print Manager Documents /
Page Numbers: 882, From:
Lorraine
Cordell Sent:
03
July 2014 11:20 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject:
RE: 00-COSX14MT06
Open Print Manager Documents Attachments: sofdec (COSX14MT06)
-signed.pdf Hi
Martin Ø Here is the statement of facts From: Martin Jenkin Mail To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 03
July 2014 10:51 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: REF: 00-COSX14MT06 Open Print Manager
Documents Please ask Simon to sign and return Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 cid: image001.png@01CC9FAC. ( t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you
are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any
action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note
that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications
passing through our network. Broadsure
Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 329. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (23) /
Page Numbers: 883, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 03 June 2014 11:34 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi
Martin Ø Can you tell me if the claim for the 14/09/2013 has been taken off by KGM they have had notice to do
this and it was due to be done last week? Ø If it has does Simon no claims come into force now? Ø Also, can you tell me the payments for his new insurance
as Simon has not had anything from them yet in the post or from yourselves? Ø Also, what date the next payment is due to be paid. Ø The total cost of the insurance and the monthly
instalment costs please. Ø And if KMG has closed down the claim for the 14/09/2013 and Simon no claims come back into force what is the
total payment for the new insurance. Ø Also, as I said on the phone before |Simon has to go to
court for no insurance for Nov 2013 Ø when the police said Simon had tools in his van would it
please be possible to get an email which shows fully what happened as to
Simon insurance going to be closed down due to what the police said and that
the only reason it was not was due to Simon having to go to the compound and
speak to the manager who then called Kelly Tiller at KGM and told her there
was no tools when the police took the Van into the compound therefore KGM
said he was in fact insurance the day he was stopped by the police and that
the van should not have been sized, Ø also explained that you yourself talked to the police by
phone on that day and told them he was insured. Ø This would really help so it can be shown to the judge. Regards Lorraine |
||||
|
|
|
04/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 332. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (22) / Page Numbers: 886 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
05/06/2014 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 332. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (22) /
Page Numbers: 886, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 05 June 2014 10:56 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi
Martin Ø Can you let me know about the below email I sent over to
you please? Regards From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 June 2014 11:34 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Ø
Can you tell me if the claim
for the 14/09/2013 has been taken off by KGM they have had notice to do
this and it was due to be done last week? Ø
If it has does Simon no claims
come into force now? Ø
Also, can you tell me the
payments for his new insurance as Simon has not had anything from them yet in
the post or from yourselves? Ø
Also, what date the next
payment is due to be paid. Ø
The total cost of the insurance
and the monthly instalment costs please. Ø
And if KMG has closed down the
claim for the 14/09/2013 and Simon no claims come
back into force what is the total payment for the new insurance. Ø
Also, as I said on the phone
before |Simon has to go to court for no insurance for Nov 2013 Ø
when the police said Simon had
tools in his van would it please be possible to get an email which shows
fully what happened as to Simon insurance going to be closed down due to what
the police said and that the only reason it was not was due to Simon having
to go to the compound and speak to the manager who then called Kelly Tiller
at KGM and told her there was no tools when the police took the Van into the
compound therefore KGM said he was in fact insurance the day he was stopped
by the police and that the van should not have been sized, Ø
also explained that you
yourself talked to the police by phone on that day and told them he was
insured. Ø
This would really help so it
can be shown to the judge. Regards Lorraine |
||||
|
|
06/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 333. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (21) / Page Numbers: 887 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
09/06/2014 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 333. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (21) /
Page Numbers: 887, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 09 June 2014 18:29 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi
Martin Ø Please can you let me know about Simon insurance it’s
not showing on the mid database and I really need to know about the payments
and also the below emails. Ø I did call today to talk to you and left my number for
you to call me back but did not get any calls. Ø I need to know if Simon is insured. Ø The last time I spoke to you said you would get back to
me about the payments and I have not heard anything yet from you and no
paperwork has come to Simon address. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 05 June 2014 10:56 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Ø
Can you let me know about the
below email I sent over to you please? Regards From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 June 2014 11:34 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Ø
Can you tell me if the claim
for the 14/09/2013 has been taken off by KGM they have had notice to do
this and it was due to be done last week? Ø
If it has does Simon no claims
come into force now? Ø
Also, can you tell me the
payments for his new insurance as Simon has not had anything from them yet in
the post or from yourselves? Ø
Also, what date the next
payment is due to be paid. Ø
The total cost of the insurance
and the monthly instalment costs please. Ø
And if KMG has closed down the
claim for the 14/09/2013 and Simon no claims come
back into force what is the total payment for the new insurance. Ø
Also, as I said on the phone
before |Simon has to go to court for no insurance for Nov 2013 Ø
when the police said Simon had
tools in his van would it please be possible to get an email which shows
fully what happened as to Simon insurance going to be closed down due to what
the police said and that the only reason it was not was due to Simon having
to go to the compound and speak to the manager who then called Kelly Tiller
at KGM and told her there was no tools when the police took the Van into the
compound therefore KGM said he was in fact insurance the day he was stopped
by the police and that the van should not have been sized, Ø
also explained that you
yourself talked to the police by phone on that day and told them he was
insured. Ø
This would really help so it
can be shown to the judge. Regards Lorraine |
||||
|
|
4 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 335. Rachel _REF_
00-COSX14MT06-ID_63_ Open Attach Documents / Page Numbers: 889 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
10/06/2014 |
|
|
|
4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 335. Rachel _REF_
00-COSX14MT06-ID_63_ Open Attach Documents /
Page Numbers: 889, From:
Rachel
[rachelbarker@broadsuredirect.com] Sent:
10
July 2014 15:50 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
REF:
00-COSX14MT06-ID<63> Open Attach Documents Good
Afternoon Lorraine, Ø Sorry to bother you but Martin said you would be the
best person to email. Ø Could you please forward Up to Date Copy of Driving Licence
for Simon in his correct address as a matter of urgency we have been trying
to contact him but no answer. Ø Many Thanks for all your help if you have any problems
or require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me. Kind
Regards Rachel
Barker Administration Department t: 01843 594477 f:
01843 594488 Broadsure Direct – Telephone number: 01843 594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This
e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the
person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and
confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must
not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible
and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the
right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our network.
Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. |
||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 336. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (20) / Page Numbers: 890,891 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
11/06/2014 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 336. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (20) /
Page Numbers: 890,891, From:
Lorraine
Cordell Sent:
11
June 2014 21:06 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject:
RE: Simon Cordell Hi
Martin Ø Could you please give us an update to the below emails
please? Ø I did call you the other day and asked for a call back
as you were busy and left my mobile number which is 07961 Ø I have not had any calls and I am getting more worried
as Simon still has not had any paper work and also you said you would get
back to me about payments, Ø I am sure something should be due and would like to know
if Simon is still insured, Regards
Lorraine
From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 09 June 2014 18:29 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø
Please can you let me know
about Simon insurance it’s not showing on the mid database and I really need
to know about the payments and also the below emails. Ø
I did call today to talk to you
and left my number for you to call me back but did not get any calls. Ø
I need to know if Simon is
insured. Ø
The last time I spoke to you
said you would get back to me about the payments and I have not heard
anything yet from you and no paperwork has come to Simon address. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 05 June 2014 10:56 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Can you let me know about the below
email I sent over to you please? Regards From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 June 2014 11:34 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Can you tell me if the claim for the? 14/09/2013 has been taken off by KGM they have had
notice to do this and it was due to be done last week? If it has does Simon no claims come
into force now? Also, can you tell me the payments for
his new insurance as Simon has not had anything from them yet in the post or
from yourselves? Also, what date the next payment is due
to be paid. The total cost of the insurance and the monthly instalment costs
please. And if KMG has closed down the claim for the 14/09/2013 and Simon no claims come back into
force what is the 891, total payment for the new insurance.
Also, as I said on the phone before |Simon has to go to court for no
insurance for Nov 2013 when the police said Simon had tools in
his van would it please be possible to get an email which shows fully what
happened as to Simon insurance going to be closed down due to what the police
said and that the only reason it was not was due to Simon having to go to the
compound and speak to the manager who then called Kelly Tiller at KGM and
told her there was no tools when the police took the Van into the compound
therefore KGM said he was in fact insurance the day he was stopped by the
police and that the van should not have been sized, also explained that you
yourself talked to the police by phone on that day and told them he was
insured. This would really help so it can be shown to the judge. Regards Lorraine |
||||
|
27. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 27 gaheris@broadsuredirect.com_06.12.2014_REF
00-COSX14MT06-ID58 Open Attach Documents 12/06/2014 / Page Numbers: 178,179,180 181,182,183,184,185,186 187,188,189,190,191,192 193,194,195,196,197,198 199,200,201,202,203,204 205,206,207 4 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 341. Martin Jenkin RE_
[1] Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 900,901 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 5 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 342. Gaheris Edwards
_REF_ 00-COSX14MT06-ID_58_ Open Attach Documents / Page Numbers: 902 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
12/06/2014 |
13:47:00 |
X30 178,179,180 181,182,183,184 185,186,187,188 189,190,191,192 193,194,195,196 197,198,199,200 201,202,203,204 205,206,207, |
|
|
27. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 27 gaheris@broadsuredirect.com_06.12.2014_REF
00-COSX14MT06-ID58 Open Attach Documents 12/06/2014 / Page Numbers: 178,179,180 181,182,183,184,185,186 187,188,189,190,191,192 193,194,195,196,197,198 199,200,201,202,203,204 205,206,207 -- 178, From: Gaheris Edwards Sent: 12 June 2014 13:47 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: REF:
00-COSX14MT06-ID<58> Open Attach Documents Attachments: Vehicle Referral
List Edited 14082012.pdf. Examples of Proof of
trading.pdf; 021608047-12-06-2014-13- 43-09.PDF;
MotTrade-RR-Summary.pdf. Terms of Business.pdf. MotTrade-RR-wording.pdf. new biz fsa.GE.pdf. sofdec-GE.pdf. demands needs.GE.pdf Ø
As requested, Kind Regards, Gaheris Edwards Broadsure direct INSURANCE INTERMEDIARY Administration Department t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct - Telephone
number: 01843 594477 - Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is
strictly confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to
whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information
and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or
take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please
note that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail
communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. 179, Motor trade documents! 180, Motor trade documents! 181, Motor trade documents! 182, Certificate of Motor
Insurance Certificate Number MT10 021608047 183, Period of Insurance from 19th May 2014 To Noon Renewal Date 19th May 2015 Total Payable £2,088.69 184, Motor trade documents! 185, Motor trade documents! 186, Motor trade documents! 187, Motor trade documents! 188, Motor trade documents! 189, Motor trade documents! 190, Motor trade documents! 191, Motor trade documents! 192, Motor trade documents! 193, Motor trade documents! 194, Motor trade documents! 195, Motor trade documents! 196, Motor trade documents! 197, Motor trade documents! 198, Motor trade documents! 199, Motor trade documents! 200, Motor trade documents! 201, Motor trade documents! 202, Motor trade documents! 203, Motor trade documents! 204, Motor trade documents! 205, REF: 00-COSX14MT06-ID<58>
Open Attach Documents->demands needs._GE_.pdf SECTION 1 Ø Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (v1.04) SECTION 2 Ø Mr Simon Cordell Prospect Ref: COSX064MT8 Ø 109 Burncroft Avenue Enfield EN3 7JQ Date: 02/06/2014 Ø Dear Mr Cordell SECTION 3 Ø Thank you for
requesting a quotation for your insurance cover. Ø This letter sets
out the nature and scope of the services we are providing to you, together
with a Statement of Demands & Needs. Ø It will also
provide further information that we are required by law to provide. Ø Please read it
carefully and let us know immediately if any of the information is
inaccurate, so that we can take any appropriate action as soon as possible. Ø Enclosed please
find our terms of business and a policy summary. Ø It is important
that you read both in full carefully and contact us if you have any queries. Ø In selecting the
insurances set out in the recommendation section below, we have dealt on the
following basis. Ø We offer products
from a range of insurers for private cars, light vans and buildings and
contents (non-commercial). Ø We only offer
products from a limited number of insurers for Motor Trade, Heavy Goods
Vehicles (HGV), Fleet, Liability, Landlords, Commercial Premises, and
commercial Combined non-investment insurance contracts. Ø Ask us for a list
of insurers we offer insurance from. Duty to disclose
all material facts Ø It is your
responsibility to provide complete and accurate information to insurers when
you take out your insurance policy, throughout the life of the policy, and
when you renew your insurance. Ø Failure to disclose
information pertaining to your insurance, or any inaccuracies in information
given or changes in circumstances, could result in your insurance being
invalid or cover not operating fully and could mean that part or all of a
claim may not be paid. Ø It is important
that you ensure that all statements you make on your proposal forms,
statement of fact declaration, renewal declaration, claims forms and any
other documentation are full and accurate. Ø If a form is
completed on your behalf, you should check the answers shown to any questions
are true and accurate before signing the document. Ø You are reminded
that it is an offence under The Road Traffic Act to make any false statements
or withhold relevant information to obtain a Certificate of Insurance. Ø Please note under
the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 you are required not to disclose
convictions regarded as "Spent". Ø You are advised to
keep copies of any correspondence you send to us or direct to your insurer. Ø Material facts are
ones which are likely to influence an insurer in the assessment and
acceptance of the 206, Ø application, for
example for motor insurance any offence including motor and non-motor
offences, drivers’ infirmities, a young or inexperienced driver, Examples for
household, buy to let property and commercial premises insurance include
subsidence, flood, landslip, theft. Ø For example, for
liability insurance previous claims, potential future claims, for Goods in
Transit insurance hazardous goods, pharmaceuticals, time critical goods, for
commercial combined all facts concerning risks covered. Ø Criminal
convictions, bankruptcy, administration, receivership, liquidation, country
of residence or if you have had insurance declined or cancelled should be
disclosed for all types of insurance. Ø These are only
examples and is not meant to be an exhaustive list. If you are in any
doubt about whether information is material, you should disclose it. Ø Should you require
further guidance, please contact us. Ø SECTION 4 Your Demands and
Needs Ø You have requested
a quotation on the basis of your requirements below: Ø We have set out
below our understanding of your demands and needs and whether the policy we
have selected meets those demands and needs. Ø Please read the
information below carefully. Ø It records the
statements and information you provided when requesting the quotation. Ø If any of the
information is incorrect or incomplete please contact us immediately, so that
we can take any appropriate action as soon as possible. Ø Based on the
information set out below, we are making a personal recommendation to you of
the policy proposed for the reasons set out on this letter. Ø Comprehensive Cover
/ Road Risk Only Indemnity Limit £10,000 No Public or Employer Liability
Cover Mr Simon Cordell to Drive
Ø Payment by Direct
Debit Ø £500 Excess Ø The Period of
insurance covered in this quotation is 12 months. SECTION 5 Ø We have reviewed
the policies within our range and recommend the following policy to be the
most suitable to meet your needs: Ø Covea Policy Ø The Above Policy
meets all your demands and needs set out as above Main exclusions,
Limitations, and conditions. 207, Ø You should read
carefully and take note of all exclusions, excesses, limitations, or
conditions as set out in this letter and the enclosed Policy Summary. A copy
of the policy is available on request. SECTION 6 Ø From the
information provided we are able to offer the following quotation. This and
all quotations are subject to change in respect of the premium indicated and
the terms and conditions that are supplied. SECTION 7 Ø Covea Ø Policy Premium: £
2088.69 Ø Including of£
125.32 Ø Broker Arrangement
Fee: £ Ø Legal Expenses: £ Ø Total of Ø Premiums and Fees:
£ 2088.69 Ø Including of£125.32 SECTION 8 - Insurer
Instalments Ø See attached Direct
Debit mandate SECTION 9 - Broker
Instalments WITH DEPOSIT Ø The Total Premium
and Fees can be paid by instalments with an initial payment of £ 1044.35
followed by monthly 1 Ø instalments of £
1044.35 each. Payment by instalments is offered subject to status and the
terms and conditions of a Ø customer credit
agreement. SECTION 10 Ø Please see copy
credit agreement form where applicable. SECTION 11 Ø Other taxes or
costs, or both, may exist which are not paid through, nor imposed, by us. Ø If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Yours sincerely Broadsure Direct 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 341. Martin Jenkin _RE_ [1]
Simon Cordell /
Page Numbers: 900,901, From: Martin Jenkin martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 12 June 2014 13:41 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: [1] Simon Cordell Ø Hi Lorraine, Ø Payment Date Amount
£196.67
£196.63
£196.67
£196.67
£196.67
£196.67
£196.67
£196.67
£196.67
£196.67
£196.67 From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 11 June 2014 21:06 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Ø
Could you please give us an
update to the below emails please? Ø
I did call you the other day
and asked for a call back as you were busy and left my mobile number which is
07961 833021. Ø
I have not had any calls and I
am getting more worried as Simon still has not had any paperwork and also you
said you would get back to me about payments, I am sure something should be
due and would like to Ø
know if Simon is still insured, Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 09 June 2014 18:29 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Please can you let me know about Simon insurance
it’s not showing on the mid database and I really need to know about the
payments and also the below emails. I did call today to take to you and left
my number for you to call me back but did not get any calls. I need to know
if Simon is insured. The last time I spoke to you said you would get back to
me about the payments and I have not heard anything yet from you and no
paperwork has come to Simon address. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 05 June 2014 10:56 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Can you let me know about the below
email I sent over to you please? Regards From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 June 2014 11:34 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 901, Hi Martin Can you tell me if the claim for the? 14/09/2013 has been taken off by KGM they have had
notice to do this and it was due to be done last week. If it has does Simon
no claims come into force now? Also, can you tell me the payments for
his new insurance as Simon has not had anything from them yet in the post or
from yourselves? Also, what date the next payment is due
to be paid. The total cost of the insurance and the monthly instalment costs
please. And if KMG has closed down the claim for the 14/09/2013 and Simon no claims come back into
force what is the total payment for the new insurance. Also, as I said on the
phone before |Simon has to go to court for no insurance for Nov 2013 when the police said Simon had tools in
his van would it please be possible to get an email which shows fully what
happened as to Simon insurance going to be closed down due to what the police
said and that the only reason it was not was due to Simon having to go to the
compound and speak to the manager who then called Kelly Tiller at KGM and
told her there was no tools when the police took the Van into the compound
therefore KGM said he was in fact insurance the day he was stopped by the
police and that the van should not have been sized, also explained that you
yourself talked to the police by phone on that day and told them he was
insured. This would really help so it can be shown to the judge. Regards Lorraine 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 342. Gaheris Edwards _REF_ 00-COSX14MT06-ID_58_ Open Attach Documents / Page Numbers: 902, From: Gaheris Edwards Sent: 12 June 2014 13:47 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: REF: 00-COSX14MT06-ID<58> Open Attach Documents Attachments: Vehicle
Referral List Edited 14082012.pdf. Examples of Proof of trading.pdf. 021608047-12-06-2014-13-43-09.PDF. MotTrade_RR_Summary.pdf. Terms of Business.pdf. MotTrade_RR_wording.pdf. new biz fsa._GE_.pdf. sofdec._GE_.pdf. demands needs._GE_.pdf As requested, Ø
Kind Regards, Gaheris Edwards cid: image001.png@01CF8644.A Administration Department t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct – Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you
are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any
action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note
that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications
passing through our network. Broadsure
Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. |
||||
|
|
|
13/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
27/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/06/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/06/2014 |
|
|
Simulation July 2014 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
July
2014 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/07/2014 |
|
|
|
13. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 13 martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com_07.03.2014_REF 00-COSX14MT06
Open Print Manager Documents 03/07/2014 / Page Numbers: 70,71 “Got put in the
wrong place in the index – Sorted here! was 13” |
03/07/2014 |
10:51:00 |
X2 70,71 |
|
|
13. Additional Email
Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 13 martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com_07.03.2014_REF 00-COSX14MT06
Open Print Manager Documents 03/07/2014 / Page Numbers: 70,71 -- 70, From: Martin Jenkin <martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com> Sent: 03 July 2014 10:51 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: REF: 00-COSX14MT06 Open
Print Manager Documents Attachments: sofdec
(COSX14MT06).pdf Ø Please ask Simon to
sign and return Regards Martin Jenkin DDI
01843 598744 Broadsure direct INSURANCE INTERMEDIARY t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct - Telephone
number: 01843 594477 - Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you
are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any
action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note
that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications
passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. 71,
End of Picture! |
||||
|
|
|
04/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
06/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/07/2014 |
|
|
|
28. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 28 rachelbarker@broadsuredirect.com_07.10.2014_REF
00-COSX14MT06-ID63 Open Attach Documents 10/07/2014 / Page Numbers: 208 |
10/07/2014 |
15:50:00 |
X1 208 |
|
|
28. Additional Email
Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 28 rachelbarker@broadsuredirect.com_07.10.2014_REF
00-COSX14MT06-ID63 Open Attach Documents 10/07/2014 / Page Numbers: 208 -- 208, From: Rachel rachelbarker@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 10 July 2014 15:50 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: REF:
00-COSX14MT06-ID<63> Open Attach Documents Good Afternoon Lorraine, Ø
Sorry to bother you
but Martin said you would be the best person to email. Ø
Could you please
forward Up to Date Copy of Driving Licence for Simon in his correct address
as a matter of urgency we have been trying to contact him but no answer. Ø
Many Thanks for all
your help if you have any problems or require any further information please
do not hesitate to contact me. Kind Regards Rachel Barker Broadsure direct INSURANCE INTERMEDIARY
Administration Department t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct - Telephone
number: 01843 594477 - Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is
strictly confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to
whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information
and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or
take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please
note that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail
communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised
and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. |
||||
|
|
|
11/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 345. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ 00-COSX14MT06-ID_63_ Open Attach Documents / Page
Numbers: 910 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
12/07/2014 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 345. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
00-COSX14MT06-ID_63_ Open Attach Documents /
Page Numbers: 910, From:
Lorraine
Cordell Sent:
12
July 2014 10:08 To: 'Rachel' Subject:
RE: 00-COSX14MT06-ID<63>
Open Attach Documents Hello
Rachel Ø Simon did ask Martin the other
day about this and Martin said the only document that was missing due to an
error on my part was the statement of facts as I had sent him the old
insurance one which I corrected by him sending me the one he needed by email
and then getting Simon to sign it and sending it back to Martin. Ø Simon has never changed his
address on his of Driving Licence or his passport they have always been in my
address, if you would need one in his address then we would need to send off
to DVLA and get it changed which he has never wanted to do as he feels safer
that they always come to my addressee as he sometimes does not get his mail
to his address. Ø We have never had any
problems before due to them being in my address, do you need the Driving
Licence changed to his address for a reason? Regards
Lorraine
Cordell From: Rachel Mail To: rachelbarker@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 10 July 2014 15:50 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: REF: 00-COSX14MT06-ID<63> Open Attach Documents Good Afternoon Lorraine, Ø Sorry to bother you but
Martin said you would be the best person to email. Ø Could you please
forward Up to Date Copy of Driving Licence for Simon in his correct address
as a matter of urgency we have been trying to contact him but no answer. Ø Many Thanks for all
your help if you have any problems or require any further information please
do not hesitate to contact me. Kind Regards Rachel Barker Broadsure direct INSURANCE INTERMEDIARY Administration Department t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct - Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax
Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient,
you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on it. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as
possible and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve
the right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. |
||||
|
|
|
13/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 344. TEC_TEC
Acknowledgment / Page
Numbers: 912, 213 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
21/07/2014 |
|
|
|
3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 344. TEC_TEC Acknowledgment / Page Numbers: 912,213 From: TEC Sent: 21
July 2014 13:55 To: Lorraine
Cordell Subject: TEC Acknowledgment Ø Thank you for using the
Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) Customer Service email account. Ø We will aim to process your
email in line with current TEC targets and procedures. Ø Please note that where an
application to have the Court registration revoked is received, this will be
processed in the following time scale: Ø Witness Statement or
Statutory Declarations received Monday Friday and within the time allowed to
file will be processed within 48 hours of receipt. Ø Applications to file a
Witness Statement or Statutory Declaration ‘out of time’ received on Monday –
Friday by 16.00hrs, will be processed on the day of receipt. Ø If your application is
received after 16.00hrs it will be processed on the following working day. Ø Please note the TEC does not
have the resources to provide the following: Confirmation of appeal forms
received at the TEC. Ø Please contact the issuing
Local Authority who TEC will have informed that your valid application has
been received. Ø Details regarding
payments/instalment plans. Ø TEC does not collect payments
on behalf of the Local Authority or their agents. Ø Please contact the issuing
Local Authority with your enquiry. Ø Locate your Penalty Charge
Number (PCN) from your name/address/vehicle registration. Ø Your correspondence will be
returned to you if your PCN is not quoted as we do not have the facility to
search. Ø Please contact the issuing
Local Authority for this information before submitting your
enquiry/application. Ø If your query is about a
bailiff or a clamped vehicle etc please contact the local authority direct.
Please note the office is closed over Easter, Christmas and Public Bank
Holidays. Ø If you would like more
information on TEC procedures please visit our website at: This email (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are
not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender
by return email. Internet email is not a secure medium. Any reply to this
message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by
email. This email (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring
/ blocking software may be used, and email content may be read at any time.
You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or
forwarding emails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned
for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied
by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal 213 purposes. |
||||
|
|
|
22/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/07/2014 |
|
|
|
24/07/2014 |
|
|||
|
|
3 ·
I was driving down Alma
Road: -- This day was a Thursday and
at 16:30 hours and on the 24th July 2014. Asbo! |
24/07/2014 |
|
|
|
3 I was
driving down Alma Road: -- Ø This day was a Thursday and
at 16:30 hours and on the 24th July 2014. Ø I personally got alleged to
have admitted to policing officers that I organized illegal raves and this is
too far a distance away from any prospect of a reality for there to be any
truth in. Ø What really took place is
that on this evening at about 16:30 hours, I was driving down Alma Road.
Ø I use this road to travel
between my mother's house and my flat as it is the shortest and fastest route
on most days. Ø My Nan used to live
off Alma Road just before 2014, so this method of a chosen
route means that I would drive or pass by her house, before she stayed at my
mother’s house. Ø I was travelling from my
mother’s home on the 24th July 204: Ø a little while after visiting
my Nan and my mother due to my Nan's illness and to also say hello
to them and others. Ø The police pulled me over on
my travels back to my home, I used Alma Road as a route and not
managed to travel less than half of the way to my destination when I noticed
an unmarked police car as it was showing to take a right turn, the opposite
way from which I was travelling. Ø It took a right turn out of
Durant’s Road when I realized it was an unmarked police car, I noticed this
as I had seen the driver on active duty in the local area beforehand, as I
drove past the unmarked police car it changed its sign to the way I was
heading, it showed left. Ø The car followed me and then
put on its blue lights, so I pulled over to the left-hand side of the road,
opposite the BMW repair centre along Alma Road ajar to the football field or
rugby field that is on the other side of the road to the plan of field next
to the high semi high rise of maisonette flats. Ø When I stopped, I pulled over
my car that I had driven on the left-hand side of the pavement that leads to
the back entrance of Durant’s Park. Ø I took note to the male
officer who got out of the passenger side of their undercover car and
approached my driver's door. Ø In understanding what they
had been like to me, so I decided that the best thing for me to do to aid in
their request without my solicitor or no witness being present was to opened
my car window to the man just the slightest little, bit and asked politely
why I got pulled over. Ø The police officer said he
was not sure why, but explained his colleague instructed him to do so. Ø It got easy to think to
myself a thought like; all these coppers have gone mad, the police officer
told me that he did not know why, he pulled me over, I had questions for him
as I asked him more questions; Ø He then hurried and back to
his unmarked police car. Ø He soon after re-approached
me while I stayed safe locked in my car, but this time he came with the
driver his college. Ø I waited for them to approach
and then as they arrived and bent down to the gap in my window, I asked again
why I got pulled over, this time the driver of the police car pulled out his
truncheon and said I had to get out of my car, and that if I declined my
window would get smashed. Ø Stunned is how I felt,
amazingly stunned, I noticed that he really meant what he said and did not
want to pay for a window, so I got out of my vehicle as I had nothing to
hide, I could not have been any, surer of anything other than that I did not
commit any offence, in fact I committed no offence whatsoever, and I
definitely was not showing up as wanted by the police. Ø It got finally explained to
me by the police that I got pulled over because I drove too close to the car
in-front of me. Ø This car referred to did not
get stopped by the officers and had not gotten stopped by the driver of that
vehicle. Ø I then got accused of having
drugs, and I continued to get searched, and my vehicle also went through the
same procedure of a full custom search and nothing got found as I had nothing
illegal on me. Ø It then got asked by the
police officers what I had recently got up to, so I said to them both; that I
was setting up my company catalogue and that catalogue I was building with a
friend, this included talk about my company website; I explained to the
police officers that I almost finished completing it, I also said to them
that I was trying to achieve positive effects within today's society with my
business that I am building a brad for. Ø Once the police checked
everything, they needed to get parted after I shook hands with them both and
said goodbye. Ø Then I made my way home, and
I surely did not cause any Anti-Social Behaviour on the 24th July 2014. Ø Shortly after the police
added this day also into the Anti-Social Behaviour Order and now, I have got
the following problems with the case file paperwork and governing laws
representing the case. |
||||
|
|
|
25/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/07/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/07/2014 |
|
|
Simulation August 2014 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
August 2014 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
06/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 346. Lorraine Cordell
_Fwd._ Our ref_ A27_190530 AX REF – 403050 Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page
Numbers: 918,919,920,921,922,923,924 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
07/08/2014 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 346. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._
Our ref_ A27_190530 AX REF - 403050 Simon Cordell_ (1) /
Page Numbers: 918,919,920,921,922,923,924, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 07 August 2014 13:30 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: Our ref: A27/190530 AX REF 403050 Simon
Cordell Attachments: Chris Garvin _ RE_ Our ref_
A27_190530_AX REF 403050.pdf Hi
Martin Ø Please see the list of emails
that I sent to the insurance company that put the claim in for the 15/09/2014
the ref for this claim for accident exchange was ref: A27/190530 AX REF
403050(11) they were sent from Simon email address. Ø Also please see the attached
document that was sent over to KGM so the claim could be taken off of Simon
insurance from Chris Garvin from accident exchange. Ø I was the one that had to
deal with this to sort this out as you will see as KGM was not doing anything
to sort this claim out which was against Simon name. Ø This was cleared from Simon
insurance in May 2014 so I cannot understand why it is still on Simon
insurance. Ø I have sent this over before
to you when it was sorted but it seems to still be on there and KGM did say
to me that they would send you the details so it could be taken off. Ø Can this please be addressed,
and this taken off Simon insurance so that his insurance is not so high and
his no claims can come back into force. Regards Lorraine From: Rewired [Mail To: re_wired@ymail.com] Sent: 07 August 2014 13:03 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Fwd.: Our ref: A27/190530 AX REF 403050 On Tuesday,
27 May 2014, 10:01, Rewired <re_wired@ymail.com> wrote: On Tuesday,
27 May 2014, 9:55, Chris Garvin <cgarvin@accidentexchange.com> wrote: 919, 27/05/2014 From: Rewired [Mail To: re_wired@ymail.com] Sent: 27
May 2014 09:55 To: Chris Garvin Subject: Re: Our ref: A27/190530 AX REF - 403050 Hell Chris Ø
Yes, if at all
possible, could you please forward me a copy, Ø
I need to try
and sort this today and get my no claims put back in place. Regards Simon 27/05/2014 On Tuesday, 27 May 2014,
9:05, Chris Garvin cgarvin@accidentexchange.com > wrote: Mr. Cordell, Ø I have noted your email
having returned from the Bank Holiday weekend. Ø Do you still require a copy
of the email sent to your representatives? Regards, Chris 23/05/2014 From: Rewired Mail To: re_wired@ymail.com Sent:
23
May 2014 17:37 To: Chris Garvin Subject:
Re: Our ref: A27/190530
AX REF – 403050 To Mr Chris Garvin Ø Could you please forward me a
copy of the email you have sent to KGM please, they seem to take their time
with doing anything and if I have the email, I can call them and maybe sort
this matter out faster with them if I have a copy of your email to them. Regards S Cordell On Friday, 23 May 2014,
17:25, Chris Garvin cgarvin@accidentexchange.com > wrote: Mr. Cordell, Ø I have today emailed your
Insurer advising I am seeking to re-direct the matter to Mr. Harris as I am
satisfied you have no involvement in the matter. Kind regards, Chris 920, 23/05/2014 From: Rewired Mail To: re_wired@ymail.com Sent: 23 May 2014 17:07 To: Chris Garvin Subject: Re: Our ref: A27/190530 AX REF - 403050 To Chris Garvin Ø Thank you for your recent
correspondence on the phone and by email on the 22/05/2014 Ø Please see attached proof of
the sale of the index incident vehicle, CX52 JRZ. Ø Could you please now let my
insurance company KGM know that this matter has now been fully re-direct to
Mr. Harris Ø and that you can now
completely discount my insurance from your enquiries, Ø I would be very grateful if
this can be done so that KGM can give me my no claims back. Regards S Cordell 22/05/2014 On Thursday, 22 May 2014,
16:35, Rewired <re wired@ymail.com> wrote: On Thursday, 22 May 2014,
12:23, Chris Garvin cgarvin@accidentexchange.com > wrote: To whom this may concern, Ø Thank you for your recent
correspondence. Ø Please be advised that we
have sought to redirect our claim to Mr. Harris as previously requested. Ø However, to date we have
received no positive contact from Mr. Harris thus investigators have been
appointed. Ø So, as we can completely
discount your insured from our enquiries, Ø we would be grateful if you
could provide the proof of the sale of the index incident vehicle, CX52 JRZ.
We look forward to hearing from you. Regards, Chris Chris Garvin 921, Claims
Negotiator Accident
Exchange Limited Alpha 1, Canton
Lane, Hams Hall, Birmingham,
B46 1GA T: 08700 116 720 M: E: caarvin@accidentexchanae.com Accident
Exchange Limited registered in England, registered number 04141140,
registered office Alpha 1, Canton Lane, Hams Hall, Birmingham B46 1GA. Accident Exchange Limited is a subsidiary
company of Automotive and Insurance Solutions Group Pic. Confidentiality: This email and its
attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If
they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor
must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this email and
highlight the error. Security Warning: Please note that this email
has been created in the knowledge that Internet email is not 100% secure
communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of
security when emailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps
to ensure that this email and attachments are free from any virus, we advise
that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they
are actually virus free. We do not accept responsibility for any virus that
may be transferred by way of this e-mail. For more information about
Accident Exchange, please visit our web site at Hi
Claire, Ø Thank you for your email. Ø I can confirm we are
satisfied that your insured has no responsibility/negligence for the index
incident. Regards,
Chris
23/05/2014 From:
Claire
Wilson [Mail To: C.Wilson@aaconline.co.uk] Sent:
23
May 2014 11:15 To: Chris Garvin Subject:
RE: Our ref: A27/190530 AX REF - 403050 Hi
Chris Ø Please send requested
document. Ø We await your urgent
confirmation that our Insured is not accountable for the accident and we may
close our file Thanks
Claire 922, Claire
Wilson Claims Handler Email:
C.Wilson@autoaccidentclaims.co.uk Auto Accident Claims on behalf of KGM Insurance I
7 Argent Court I Sylvan Way I Southfields Business Park I Basildon I Essex I
SS15 6TH Tel: DDI:
01702 444 317 Fax: 0845
077 9727 cid:
imaged Accident
Management You Can Rely On Please
visit our website at - www.autoaccidentclaims.co.uk 22/05/2014 From:
Chris
Garvin Mail To: caarvin@accidentexchanae.com Sent:
22
May 2014 12:23 To: Claire Wilson Cc: SA Outgoing; re_wired@ymail.com Subject:
Our ref: A27/190530 AX REF - 403050 To
whom this may concern, Ø Thank you for your recent
correspondence. Ø Please be advised that we
have sought to re-direct our claim to Mr. Harris as previously requested. Ø However, to date we have
received no positive contact from Mr. Harris thus investigators have been
appointed. Ø So, as we can completely
discount your insured from our enquiries, Ø we would be grateful if you
could provide the proof of the sale of the index incident vehicle, CX52 JRZ.
We look forward to hearing from you. Regards,
Chris
Chris
Garvin Claims
Negotiator Accident
Exchange Limited Alpha 1, Canton Lane, Hams Hall, Birmingham, B46 1GA T: 08700 116 720 M: E: caarvin@accidentexchanae.com Accident
Exchange Limited registered in England, registered number 04141140,
registered office Alpha 1, Canton Lane, Hams Hall, Birmingham B46 1GA. Accident Exchange Limited is a subsidiary
company of Automotive and Insurance Solutions Group Pic. Confidentiality:
This
email and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be
confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based
on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this email
and highlight the error. 923, Hi
Claire, Ø Thank you for your email. Ø I can confirm we are
satisfied that your insured has no responsibility/negligence for the index
incident. Regards,
Chris
23/05/2014 From:
Claire
Wilson [Mail To: C.Wilson@aaconline.co.uk] Sent: 23 May 2014 11:15 To: Chris Garvin Subject: RE: Our ref: A27/190530 AX REF - 403050 Hi
Chris Ø Please send requested
document. Ø We await your urgent
confirmation that our Insured is not accountable for the accident and we may
close our file Thanks
Claire
Claire
Wilson Claims Handler Email:
C.Wilson@autoaccidentclaims.co.uk Auto Accident Claims on behalf of KGM Insurance I
7 Argent Court I Sylvan Way I Southfields Business Park I Basildon I Essex I
SS15 6TH Tel: DDI:
01702 444 317 Fax: 0845
077 9727 cid:
imaged Accident
Management You Can Rely On Please
visit our website at - www.autoaccidentclaims.co.uk 22/05/2014 From:
Chris
Garvin Mail To: caarvin@accidentexchanae.com Sent:
22
May 2014 12:23 To: Claire Wilson Cc: SA Outgoing; re wired@ymail.com Subject:
Our ref: A27/190530 AX REF - 403050 To whom
this may concern, Security Warning: Please note that this email
has been created in the knowledge that Internet email is not a 100% secure
communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of
security when emailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps
to ensure that this email and attachments are free from any virus, we advise
that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they
are actually virus free. We do not accept responsibility for any virus that
may be transferred by way of this e-mail.
For more information about Accident Exchange, please visit our web
site at 924, Ø Thank you for your recent
correspondence. Ø Please be advised that we
have sought to re-direct our claim to Mr. Harris as previously requested. Ø However, to date we have
received no positive contact from Mr. Harris thus investigators have been
appointed. Ø So, as we can completely
discount your insured from our enquiries, Ø we would be grateful if you
could provide the proof of the sale of the index incident vehicle, CX52 JRZ. Ø We look forward to hearing
from you. Regards,
Chris
Chris
Garvin Claims
Negotiator Accident
Exchange Limited Alpha 1, Canton Lane, Hams Hall, Birmingham, B46 1GA T: 08700 116 720 M: E: caarvin@accidentexchanae.com Accident
Exchange Limited registered in England, registered number 04141140,
registered office Alpha 1, Canton Lane, Hams Hall, Birmingham B46 1GA. Accident Exchange Limited is a subsidiary
company of Automotive and Insurance Solutions Group Pic. Confidentiality: This email and its
attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If
they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor
must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this email and
highlight the error. Security Warning: Please note that this email
has been created in the knowledge that Internet email is not a 100% secure
communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of
security when emailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps
to ensure that this email and attachments are free from any virus, we advise
that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they
are actually virus free. We do not accept responsibility for any virus that
may be transferred by way of this e-mail.
For more information about Accident Exchange, please visit our web
site at It is
unbelievable that I am still supposed to live in the flat with such
lamentable damp and cold conditions! |
||||
|
|
|
08/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 347. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._
Our ref_ A27_190530 AX REF - 403050 Simon Cordell / Page
Numbers: 932,933,934,935,936,937,938 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
13/08/2014 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 347. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._
Our ref_ A27_190530 AX REF - 403050 Simon Cordell /
Page Numbers: 932,933,934,935,936,937,938, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 13 August 2014 15:44 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: Our ref: A27/190530 AX REF 403050 Simon
Cordell Attachments: Chris Garvin _RE_ Our ref_
A27_190530_AX REF 403050.pdf Hi
Martin Ø Can you give me an update as
to what is going on with Simon insurance as we have not heard from you since? Ø the telephone call on 07/08/2014. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 07 August 2014 13:30 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: FW: Our ref: A27/190530 AX REF 403050 Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø Please see the list of emails that I sent to the insurance company
that put the claim in for the 15/09/2014 the ref for this claim for
accident exchange was ref: A27/190530 AX REF 403050(11) they were sent from
Simon email address. Ø Also please see the attached document that was sent over to KGM so the
claim could be taken off of Simon insurance from Chris Garvin from accident
exchange. Ø I was the one that had to deal with this to sort this out as you will
see as KGM was not doing anything to sort this claim out which was against
Simon name. Ø This was cleared from Simon insurance in May 2014 so I cannot
understand why it is still on Simon insurance. Ø I have sent this over before to you when it was sorted but it seems to
still be on there and KGM did say to me that they would send you the details
so it could be taken off. Ø Can this please be addressed, and this taken off Simon insurance so
that his insurance is not so high and his no claims can come back into force. Regards Lorraine From: Rewired [Mail To: re_wired@ymail.com] Sent: 07 August 2014 13:03 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Fwd.: Our ref: A27/190530 AX REF 403050 933,934,935,936,937,938, |
||||
|
|
|
14/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
28/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/08/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/08/2014 |
|
|
Simulation September 2014 (Click
here to go back to the Index)
|
September
2014 |
||||||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||||||
|
|
|
01/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
02/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
03/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
04/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
05/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
06/09/2014 |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
07/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
08/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
09/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
10/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 350. GL-SWESTERNMCENQ_RE_
Urgent Simon CORDELL re opening Att Miss Brown / Page
Numbers: 959 Broadsure Insurance! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ |
11/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 350. GL-SWESTERNMCENQ_RE_ Urgent
Simon CORDELL re opening Att Miss Brown /
Page Numbers: 959, From:
GL-SWESTERNMCENQ
[swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent:
11
September 2014 23:17 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject:
RE: Urgent
Simon CORDELL re opening Att Miss Brown Ø Thank you for your email
which has been passed to our correspondence team please be aware it may have
to be referred to our Legal Team and we will respond to you as soon as
possible. Polite Request: There is no need to send your
correspondence via post/DX or by fax as this risks the Court duplicating
correspondence that has already been received. This e-mail (and any attachment) is
intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return
e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a
secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by
someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material
in response to this message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring
/ blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time.
You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or
forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned
for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied
by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. |
||||||||
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 351. GL-BRENTMCENQ_RE_
urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899 / Page Numbers: 960 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Driving - Case No –
011401596899 - On 01/01/2014 3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 353. GL-BRENTMCENQ_RE_
urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899_ (1) / Page Numbers: 961 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Driving - Case No –
011401596899 - On 01/01/2014 4 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 354. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899_ (1) / Page Numbers: 962,963 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Driving - Case No –
011401596899 - On 01/01/2014 5 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 355. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899 / Page Numbers: 964,965 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Driving - Case No –
011401596899 - On 01/01/2014 6 ·
The start of the Anti-Social
Behaviour Order Case
proceeding for me. Asbo! |
12/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 351. GL-BRENTMCENQ_RE_ urgent
Simon CORDELL 011401596899 /
Page Numbers: 960, From: GLBRENTMCENQ [glbrentmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 12 September 2014
14:22 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: urgent Simon CORDELL
011401596899 Ø Thank you for emailing the
North West and West London Magistrates' Courts Administration Centre. Please
be aware that it has been received and will be processed. Polite Request: Please refrain from also sending
your correspondence via post/DX or by fax as this risks the Court duplicating
correspondence that has already been received. Thank you for your
cooperation. This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the
attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is
not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read
by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send
material in response to this message by email. This email (whether you are
the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the
Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and
email content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure
laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 353. GL-BRENTMCENQ_RE_ urgent
Simon CORDELL 011401596899_ (1) /
Page Numbers: 961, From: GLBRENTMCENQ [glbrentmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 12 September 2014
15:11 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: urgent Simon CORDELL
011401596899 Ø Thank you for emailing the
North West and West London Magistrates' Courts Administration Centre. Ø Please be aware that it has
been received and will be processed. Polite Request: Please refrain from also
sending your correspondence via post/DX or by fax as this risks the Court
duplicating correspondence that has already been received. Thank you for your
cooperation. This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the
attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is
not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read
by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send
material in response to this message by email. This email (whether you are
the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the
Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and
email content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure
laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The
original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 354. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899_ (1) /
Page Numbers: 962,963, From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
12
September 2014 14:22 To: gl-brentmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject:
RE: urgent
Simon CORDELL 011401596899 Dear Sir
or Madam Ø I have tried to call the
court on a number of occasions regarding my conviction and sentence for no
insurance but the phone just rings when I press the number given to ask about
this case the telephone number, I am calling is 0208 955 0555. Ø I have now found out the
information to the case but pressing number 7 the lady I spoke to did in fact
try and put me to a manager but that also just ring then cut me off. Ø So, I called back again and
asked her if she could give me the information which she did. Ø I am making this request to
have my case listed in order that I can do the following: -
My
name: Mr
Simon Paul Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981. Address: 109 Burncroft Av Enfield
Middlesex EN3 7JQ Case
No: 011401596899
Application to set aside the conviction: - Ø On 01/01/2014 I was
stopped by the police as they did not believe that I held a valid policy of
insurance. Due to this being a holiday my insurance company was closed so the
police could not check if I was in fact was insured, I was insured and asked
the police to check there records due to the number of problems I had had
with my insurance not showing on the MID database and being stopped do many
times they did this and could in fact see many times but still impounded my
van reg CX52 JRZ. Ø After the holidays I went to
the compound and had to again pay for my Van to be taken out of the
compound. Ø I never received any summons
in relation to this matter and I only became aware that the case had been
dealt with in my absence when I received a letter from the DVLA advising me
that I had to send in my driving licence.
Ø I disputed with the DVLA the
points, but I was given an ultimatum that if I did not send in my licence it
would be revoked. Ø The offence of no insurance
was allegedly committed on 01/01/2014. Ø I had a valid policy of
insurance from 23/02/2013 and this policy was valid until 22/02/2014
Ø The company insuring me was
KGM, and my broker was Broadsure direct I am the named policy holder, Mr.
Simon Cordell and my policy number is MT3574694. Ø I have points on my licence
which I should not have. Ø Can you please as a matter of
urgency email me back on this matter so that I can have a date so that the
conviction can be set aside and my case heard in order that I can show the
court my insurance and the PLO can make the necessary enquiries. Ø I would be grateful if you can
inform DVLA that this matter and the points that have been added to my
licence is being disputed so this can be put on hold as I do not see why I
should suffer when I have done nothing wrong and I was insured to drive. Ø This is in fact have a big
effect on my life when I have done nothing wrong and would like this
addressed as a matter of urgency. Ø This matter is urgent. Ø I cannot resolve this matter
until the case is listed before either a District Judge or Magistrates so I
would appreciate your cooperation. Ø I am very disappointed that
you have ignored all my emails. Ø This is causing me stress. Ø Can you now please resolve
this legal mater by listing the case for an application to set aside the
conviction? Ø I can then forward my
documents to the relevant prosecuting authority. Ø Please see attached my
insurance documents for this offence in fact showing I was in fact
insured. Ø I await hearing from you in
relation to this matter and I thank you in advance for your anticipated
co-operation in 963, this
matter. Yours
faithfully Simon
Cordell 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 355. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899 / Page Numbers: 964,965, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 12 September 2014
15:11 To: gl-brentmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899 Attachments: S
Cordell Cert - GE_ 2013-2014.pdf Dear Sir or Madam Ø I have tried to call the court on a number of occasions regarding my
conviction and sentence for no insurance but the phone just rings when I
press the number given to ask about this case the telephone number, I am
calling is 0208 955 0555. Ø I have now found out the information to the case but pressing number 7
the lady I spoke to did in fact try and put me to a manager but that also
just ring then cut me off. Ø So, I called back again and asked her if she could give me the
information which she did. Ø I am making this request to have my case listed in order that I can do
the following: -
My name: Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981. Address: 109 Burncroft Av Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ Case No: 011401596899 Application to set aside the conviction: - Ø On 01/01/2014 I was stopped by the police as they did not
believe that I held a valid policy of insurance. Due to this being a holiday
my insurance company was closed so the police could not check if I was in
fact was insured, I was insured and asked the police to check there records
due to the number of problems I had had with my insurance not showing on the
MID database and being stopped do many times they did this and could in fact
see many times but still impounded my van reg CX52 JRZ. Ø After the holidays I went to the compound and had to again pay for my
Van to be taken out of the compound. Ø I never received any summons in relation to this matter and I only
became aware that the case had been dealt with in my absence when I received
a letter from the DVLA advising me that I had to send in my driving
licence. Ø I disputed with the DVLA the points, but I was given an ultimatum that
if I did not send in my licence it would be revoked. Ø The offence of no insurance was allegedly committed on 01/01/2014.
Ø I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/02/2013 and this policy
was valid until 22/02/2014 Ø The company insuring me was KGM, and my broker was Broadsure direct I
am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell and my policy number is
MT3574694. Ø I have points on my licence which I should not have. Ø Can you please as a matter of urgency email me back on this matter so
that I can have a date so that the conviction can be set aside and my case
heard in order that I can show the court my insurance and the PLO can make
the necessary enquiries. Ø I would be grateful if you can inform DVLA that this matter and the
points that have been added to my licence is being disputed so this can be
put on hold as I do not see why I should suffer when I have done nothing
wrong and I was insured to drive. Ø This is in fact have a big effect on my life when I have done nothing
wrong and would like this addressed as a matter of urgency. Ø This matter is urgent. Ø I cannot resolve this matter until the case is listed before either a
District Judge or Magistrates so I would appreciate your cooperation. Ø I am very disappointed that you have ignored all my emails. Ø This is causing me stress. Ø Can you now please resolve this legal mater by listing the case for an
application to set aside the conviction? Ø I can then forward my documents to the relevant prosecuting
authority. Ø Please see attached my insurance documents for this offence in fact
showing I was in fact insured. 965, Ø I await hearing from you in relation to this matter and I thank you in
advance for your anticipated co-operation in this matter. Yours faithfully Simon Cordell |
||||||||
|
|
|
13/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
14/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
29. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 29 tatjana.rogovska2@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_09.15.2014_RE Not read RE
urgent Simon CORDELL 01140159689 15/09/2014 / Page Numbers: 209 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 356. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell documents_ (1) / Page
Numbers: 966 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
15/09/2014 |
09:31:00 |
X1 209 |
|||||
|
30. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 30 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_09.15.2014_RE Simon Cordell
documents 15/09/2014 / Page Numbers: 210,211,212 |
15/09/2014 |
23:24:00 |
X3 210,211,212 |
|||||
|
29. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 29 tatjana.rogovska2@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_09.15.2014_RE Not read RE
urgent Simon CORDELL 01140159689 15/09/2014 / Page Numbers: 209 29. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 29 tatjana.rogovska2@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_09.15.2014_RE Not read RE
urgent Simon CORDELL 01140159689 15/09/2014 / Page Numbers: 209 -- 209, From: Rogovska2, Tatjana tatjana.rogovska2@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 15 September 2014
09:31 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Not read: RE:
urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899 Ø
There were 2 emails
from you in our inbox which looked identical to me and one of them had an
attachment. Ø
I deleted the email
without the attachment. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 12 September 2014 19:33 To: Rogovska2, Tatjana Subject: FW: Not read: RE:
urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899 Dear Rogovska2, Tatjana Ø Can you please
advise as to what email was deleted? Ø I did send 2 emails
the same but the 1st one I forgot to attach my insurance document so I sent
the email again which included my insurance document can you please advise as
to if you have my email and the attached insurance document? Regards Simon Cordell From: Rogovska2, Tatjana mailto: tatiana.roaovska2@hmcts.asi.gov.uk Sent: 12 September 2014 16:30 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Not read: RE: urgent Simon
CORDELL 011401596899 Ø Your message was
deleted without being read on 12 September 2014 15:30:05 UTC. The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 356. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell documents_ (1) /
Page Numbers: 966, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 September 2014
10:23 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell documents Attachments: Simon Driving Licence Card
Front (1).jpg; 36980126
Mr Ian Robinson.doc; 36980127
Miss M Stavros.doc; 36980128
Miss L Cordell.doc; 36980157
Jamie.Macuire.doc; 36980158
L.Cordell.doc; 36980160
SheilaLewis.doc; Sim-
insure.pdf; Simon
Driving Licence Card Back.jpg Hi
Martin Ø Can these please be passed on
for Simon Insurance Ø I did say I would get them
over on Friday to the lady that called me and said she forgot to send the
insurance documents out, she also said that policy plan had done a letter to
cancel the new policy, Ø so, can you please let me
know ASAP if everything is still ok with Simon cover. Ø She also gave me her email
wish I can’t seem to find, but I been sorting out funerals for my Late mum
and also a close friend of the family died also so at this time it’s been a
really hard time for us as a family. Regards Lorraine 30. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 30 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_09.15.2014_RE Simon Cordell
documents 15/09/2014 / Page Numbers: 210,211,212 -- 210, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 15 September 2014
23:24 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
documents Attachments: Driving Lic.jpg; Driving.Lic.Back.Part.jpg Hi Martin I am sorry my head is really
not with it I sent the wrong photo part of the licence please see attached
and pass these over. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 15 September 2014 10:23 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell documents Hi Martin Ø Can these please be passed on for Simon Insurance Ø I did say I would get them over on Friday to the lady that called me
and said she forgot to send the insurance documents out, she also said that
policy plan had done a letter to cancel the new policy, Ø so, can you please let me know ASAP if everything is still ok with
Simon cover. Ø She also gave me her email wish I can’t seem to find, but I been
sorting out funerals for my Late mum and also a close friend of the family
died also so at this time it’s been a really hard time for us as a family. Regards Lorraine 211, Copy of my Driving Licence! 212, Copy of my Driving Licence! |
||||||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 357. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell documents / Page
Numbers: 967 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
16/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 357. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell
documents / Page Numbers: 967, From: Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15
September 2014 23:24 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell documents Attachments: Driving Lic.jpg Driving.Lic.Back.Part.jpg Hi Martin Ø I am sorry my head is really
not with it I sent the wrong photo part of the licence please see attached
and pass Ø these over. Regards Lorraine From:
Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
15 September 2014 10:23 To: 'Martin
Jenkin' Subject:
RE: Simon Cordell documents Hi Martin Ø Can these please be passed on for Simon Insurance Ø I did say I would get them over on Friday to the lady that called me and
said she forgot to send the insurance documents out, she also said that
policy plan had done a letter to cancel the new policy, Ø so, can you please let me know ASAP if everything is still ok with
Simon cover. Ø She also gave me her email wish I can’t seem to find, but I been
sorting out funerals for my Late mum and also a close friend of the family
died also so at this time it’s been a really hard time for us as a family. Regards Lorraine |
||||||||
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 358. Craig Adams _REF_
00-COSX14MT07-ID_74_ Open Attach Documents / Page
Numbers: 969 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 359. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ 00-COSX14MT07-ID_74_ Open Attach Documents / Page Numbers: 970 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
17/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 358. Craig Adams _REF_
00-COSX14MT07-ID_74_ Open Attach Documents /
Page Numbers: 969, From:
Craig
Adams [craigadams@broadsuredirect.com] Sent:
17
September 2014 13:47 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
REF: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<74>
Open Attach Documents Hi
there Ø Please contact our office as
a matter of urgency regarding the outstanding documents. Kind
Regards Craig Adams Administration Department t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843 594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This
e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the
person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and
confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must
not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible
and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the
right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 359. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
00-COSX14MT07-ID_74_ Open Attach Documents /
Page Numbers: 970, From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
17
September 2014 15:10 To: 'Craig Adams' Subject:
RE: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<74>
Open Attach Documents Hello
Ø I have sent over 2 emails to
Martin Jerkins with all the documents that was needed Ø as far as I am aware can you
let me know what documents you are talking about please. Regards
Lorraine
From: Craig Adams [Mail To: craigadams@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 17 September 2014
13:47 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: REF: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<74> Open
Attach Documents Hi there Ø Please contact our office as a matter of urgency regarding the
outstanding documents. Kind Regards Craig Adams Administration Department t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you
are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any
action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note
that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications passing
through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority. |
||||||||
|
31. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 31 pauletta.brown-w@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_09.18.2014_FW Application to
Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ 18/09/2014 / Page Numbers: 213,214,215 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 360. Craig Adams - RE_
00-COSX14MT07-ID_74_ Open Attach Documents / Page
Numbers: 971,972 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 361. Brown-W, Paul et ta
_Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802 / Page
Numbers: 973 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 362. Brown-W, Pauletta
_FW_ Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802 / Page
Numbers: 974,975 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ |
18/09/2014 |
17:008:00 |
X3 213,214,215 |
|||||
|
31. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 31 pauletta.brown-w@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_09.18.2014_FW Application to
Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ 18/09/2014 / Page Numbers: 213,214,215 -- 213, From: Brown-W, Pauletta pauletta.brown-w@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 18 September 2014
17:08 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: FW: Application to
Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 Attachments: HMCTS - Application
to Def giving new Re-opening date - S CORDELL.doc Ø For your information, please
find letter attached Pauletta Brown |
Admin Officer | HMCTS | 176a Lavender Hill,
Battersea, London SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 F: 020 7805 1437 | DX 58559 Clapham
Junction | E: Pauletta.Brown-W@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As of June 2nd, 2014, our
fax will be GOLDFAX No:0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to
bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or
other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via
electronic means." From: Brown-W, Pauletta Sent: 18 September 2014
16:09 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk RichmondSouthProsecutions@met.police.uk Cc: LCCC Compliance
Unit; LCCC Enforcement Unit Subject: Application to Reopen
- Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 Dear Sirs, Ø Please note that
the above case has been relisted for a reopening hearing on the 30th instant
at Lavender Hill Magistrates Court, courtroom 1 at 2 pm. Ø Therefore, please
be good enough to have your file in court and can the LCCC please put this
matter on hold until after the hearing, when the Defendant will attend. Thank you. Regards P Brown Pauletta Brown |
Admin Officer | HMCTS | 176a Lavender Hill,
Battersea, London SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 F: 020 7805 1437 | DX 58559 Clapham
Junction | E: Pauletta.Brown-W@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As of June 2nd, 2014, our fax
will be GOLDFAX No:0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to
bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or
other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via
electronic means." This e-mail (and any attachment)
is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a
secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by
someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material
in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are
the sender or the recipient) may be 214, monitored,
recorded, and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring /
blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time.
You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or
forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of
this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 215, FW: Application to Reopen - Simon
P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802->HMCTS – Application to Def
giving new Re-opening date - S CORDELL.doc September 19, HM Courts & Tribunals
Service 2014 Mr Simon Cordell 109 Burncroft Avenue Enfield
Middlesex EN3 7JQ Lavender Hill Magistrates'
Court 176a Lavender Hill Battersea
London SW11 1JU DX 58559 Clapham Junction T 0207 805 1497 F 0207 805
1437 gl-swesternmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Cluster Manager: Jan Hartnett Courts in the SW Group: Lavender Hill Magistrates'
Court Wimbledon Magistrates' & Youth Court Dear Mr Cordell Our ref: 1402437891 Re: Re-opening Summons Hearing Ø
With reference to your
recent court hearing, the matter has been listed for: - Ø
Tuesday, 30th
September 2014 at 2 pm at Lavender Hill
Magistrates’ Court, Ø
176A Lavender Hill,
Battersea, London SW11 1JU Ø
Your case may be
dealt with on that day, or and a new date of hearing will be set for your
case to be heard. If you have any queries, please contact the Admin Centre at
Lavender Hill. It is in your best interest to attend this hearing. Yours faithfully, P Brow P Brown Admin Officer Lavender Hill Admin Centre 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 360. Craig Adams - RE_
00-COSX14MT07-ID_74_ Open Attach Documents /
Page Numbers: 971,972, From:
Craig
Adams [craigadams@broadsuredirect.com] Sent:
18
September 2014 15:04 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject:
RE: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<74>
Open Attach Documents Importance: High Hi
Lorraine, Ø The Policy is due to be
cancelled today at 17.00 hrs. Ø The insurance company have advised
the following Ø They are awaiting Counterpart
license with issue number 21 Ø The proof of trade is
unacceptable, as it needs to be in Simon’s name, Ø I can adjust the policy show
the trading name but it means that Simon will have to trade under that name. Ø Obviously, the license is an
issue as the Photo card is issue 21 and the counterpart copy, Ø we have had issue 19a (this
means that two licenses have been issued since the copy we have received) Ø I have been trying to ring
you so we can get this rectified but have just been told you are not
answering you phone as you are ill. Ø If the counterpart is not
received by 17.00 hrs then the policy will be cancelled by the insurers and
we have no control over this. Regards
Craig
Adams Broadsure Direct From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 17 September 2014 15:10 To: 'Craig Adams' Subject: RE: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<74>
Open Attach Documents Hello Ø I have sent over 2 emails to Martin Jerkins with all the documents
that was needed as far as I am aware can you let me know what documents you
are talking about please. Regards Lorraine From: Craig Adams [Mail To: craigadams@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 17 September 2014 13:47 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: REF: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<74> Open
Attach Documents Ø Hi there Please contact our office as a matter of urgency regarding
the outstanding documents. 972, Kind Regards Craig Adams cid: image001.png@01CEF276. Administration Department t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you
are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any
action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note
that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications
passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by
the Financial Conduct Authority. 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 361. Brown-W, Pauletta _Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495
LAH) 1401009802 / Page Numbers: 973, From: Brown W Pauletta [pauletta.brownw@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 18
September 2014 16:09 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk'; RichmondSouthProsecutions@met.police.uk Cc: LCCC Compliance Unit; LCCC
Enforcement Unit Subject: Application to Reopen Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802 Dear Sirs, Ø
Please
note that the above case has been relisted for a reopening hearing on the
30th instant at Lavender Hill Magistrates Court, courtroom 1 at 2 pm. Ø
Therefore,
please be good enough to have your file in court and can the LCCC please put
this matter on hold until after the hearing, when the Defendant will attend. Thank you. Regards P Brown Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS
| 176a Lavender Hill, Battersea, London
SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 | F: 020 7805 1437 |
DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Pauletta.BrownW@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As of June 2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No:
0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the
Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other
statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic
means." This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is
not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure
medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone
else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in
response to this message by email. This email (whether you are the sender or
the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content
may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The original
of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 362. Brown-W, Pauletta _FW_ Application to Reopen -
Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 / Page Numbers: 974,975, From: Brown W, Pauletta [pauletta.brownw@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 18
September 2014 17:08 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: FW: Application
to Reopen Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802 Attachments: HMCTS
Application to Def giving new Reopening date S CORDELL.doc Ø For your information, please find letter attached Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS
| 176a Lavender Hill, Battersea, London
SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 | F: 020 7805 1437 |
DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Pauletta.BrownW@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As of June 2nd 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No:
0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the
Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other
statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic
means." From: Brown W Pauletta Sent: 18
September 2014 16:09 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk'; RichmondSouthProsecutions@met.police.uk Cc: LCCC Compliance Unit; LCCC
Enforcement Unit Subject: Application to Reopen Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802 Dear Sirs, Please note that the above case has
been relisted for a reopening hearing on the 30th instant at Lavender Hill
Magistrates Court, courtroom 1 at 2 pm. Therefore, please be good enough to
have your file in court and can the LCCC please put this matter on hold until
after the hearing, when the Defendant will attend. Thank you. Regards P Brown Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS
| 176a Lavender Hill, Battersea, London
SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 F: 020 7805 1437 DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Pauletta.iy7u84
W@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As of June 2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No:
0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the
Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other
statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic
means." This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the
attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is
not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read
by someone else. Please bear that in 975, mind when deciding whether to send
material in response to this message by email. This email (whether you are
the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the
Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and
email content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure
laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. |
||||||||
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 363. Craig Adams - RE_
REF_ 00-COSX14MT07-ID_74_ Open Attach Documents / Page
Numbers: 976 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
19/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 363. Craig Adams - RE_ REF_
00-COSX14MT07-ID_74_ Open Attach Documents /
Page Numbers: 976, From:
Craig
Adams [craigadams@broadsuredirect.com] Sent:
19
September 2014 10:28 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject:
RE: REF:
00-COSX14MT07-ID<74> Open Attach Documents Hi
Lorraine Ø We have managed to stop the
cancelation on the policy can you please contact our office when you are
feeling better to run through the details Thank
you, Craig
Adams, From: Craig Adams [Mail To: craigadams@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 17 September 2014 13:47 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: REF: 00-GDSX14MT07-ID<74> Open Attach Documents Hi there Please contact our office as a matter
of urgency regarding the outstanding documents. Kind Regards Craig Adams cid: image001.png@01CEF276. Administration Department t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you
are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any
action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note
that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications
passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by
the Financial Conduct Authority. |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
20/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
21/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
22/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
23/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
24/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
25/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
26/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
27/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
|
28/09/2014 |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
29/09/2014 |
|
|
||||
|
32. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 32 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_09.30.2014_FW Application to
Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ 30/09/2014 / Page Numbers: 216 217,218,219,220,221,222 223,224,225,226,227,228 229 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 349. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802 / Page
Numbers: 977,978 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 364. GL-SWESTERNMCENQ_RE_
Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802 / Page
Numbers: 979 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 365. Lorraine Cordell
_Fwd._ Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802_ (1) / Page
Numbers: 980,981 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 366. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (19) / Page
Numbers: 982 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 348. Lorraine
Cordell _Fwd._ Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495
LAH) 1401009802 / Page Numbers: 957,958 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court – 011401009802
= GL-SWESTERNMCENQ |
30/09/2014 |
13:29:00 |
X14 216 217,218,219,220 221,222,223,224 225,226,227,228 229, |
|||||
|
2.
|
33. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 33
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_09.30.2014_FW Application to
Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ_001 30/09/2014 / Page Numbers: 230,231,232,233,234 235,236,237,238,239,240 241,242,243 |
30/09/2014 |
13:22:00 |
X14 230,231,232 233,234,235,236 237,238,239,240 241,242,243, |
||||
|
3.
|
34. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 34. lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_09.30.2014_RE Application to
Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ 30/09/2014 / Page Numbers: 244,245,246 247,248,249,250,251,252 253,254,255,256,257,258 |
30/09/2014 |
12:47:00 |
X14 244 245,246,247,248 249,250,251,252 253,254,255,256 257,258, |
||||
|
32. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 32 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_09.30.2014_FW Application to
Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ 30/09/2014 / Page Numbers: 216 217,218,219,220,221,222 223,224,225,226,227,228 229 -- 216, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 30 September 2014
13:29 To: mandy.skinner@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: FW: Application to
Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 Attachments: S Cordell Cert._ GE_
2013-2014.pdf Lorraine Cordell_ FW_RE_
CX52JRZ.pdf Lorraine Cordell_ FW_ RE_
Simon Cordell.pdf Lorraine Cordell_ RE_ [1] RE_
Simon Cordell.pdf Lorraine Cordell_ RE_ REF_
00-COSX14MT04-ID_42_ Urgent.pdf Lorraine Cordell_ RE_ Simon
Cordell.pdf Lorraine Cordell_ RE_ Simon
Cordell-01.pdf Forwarded re phone call From: Lorraine Cordell mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 30 September 2014
12:47 To: 'Brown-W, Pauletta' Subject: RE: Application to
Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 Dear Miss Brown Ø
My son was due to
attend court today at 2pm but he is very unwell as I said on the phone to you
his Nan has just died and he also has crohn's disease and depression, due to
his Nan passing away this has made his crohn's disease come on very bad. Ø
We have tried to
leave today to come to the court and had to turn round due to my son needing
to change his things again. Ø
Please can this
email be passed to the judge to show why my son cannot attend court today. Ø
In addition, please
show the judge my son's insurance documents and all the emails that went back
and forward to the insurance company. Ø
Can you please ask
the Officer that checks the documents to call KGM which will show he was
insured and ask him to talk to Kelly Tiller who direct number is in the
emails. Ø
Can you please get
back to me with an update to this matter and if the judge will set a new date
or deal with this matter today as he will have all the documents needed to
show my son was in fact insured. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Brown-W, Pauletta mailto: pauletta.brown-w@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 18 September 2014 17:08 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: FW: Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802 Ø For your information,
please find letter attached Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS | 176a Lavender Hill, Battersea, London SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 F: 020 7805 1437 | DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Pauletta.Brown-W@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As
of June 2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No:0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice
contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind
the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means." 217, From: Brown-W, Pauletta Sent: 18 September 2014 16:09 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk RichmondSouthProsecutions@met.police.uk Cc: LCCC Compliance Unit; LCCC Enforcement Unit Subject: Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 Dear Sirs, Ø Please note that the above case has been relisted
for a reopening hearing on the 30th instant at Lavender Hill Magistrates
Court, courtroom 1 at 2 pm. Ø Therefore, please be good enough to have your
file in court and can the LCCC please put this matter on hold until after the
hearing, when the Defendant will attend. Thank you. Regards P Brown Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS | 176a Lavender Hill, Battersea, London SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 F: 020 7805 1437 | DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Pauletta.Brown-W@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As
of June 2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No:0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice
contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind
the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means." This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is
not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at
any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. 218,
219, FW: Application to
Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802->Lorraine
CX52JRZ.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 22 November 2013 17:20 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: FW: RE: CX52JRZ Hello Martin Ø
Please see the below email that
I have been told by the police to contract Charlton Car Pound as when any
vehicle is impounded, they do a check and list all the items in the vehicle. Ø
I am hoping to get a reply to
my email on how to go about getting the list shortly. Simon From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 22 November 2013 17:14 To: vrescharlton@met.police.uk Subject: RE: CX52JRZ To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am writing this email after
calling the police and being told to contract yourselves about a matter I am
trying to sort out. My Van reg CX52 JRZ was impounded to Charlton Car Pound,
8 Bramshot Avenue, London, SE7 7HY on the 14/11/2013 tickets
No: 01/ J63181495 Ø
I have been told by the police
when I called them that each vehicle that is impounded you do a check on to
list what items are in there. Ø
I would like to know how I can
go about getting a list of items that was in my van reg CX52 JRZ as I need
this list to give it to my insurance company. Ø
Or if my insurance company
emails you can you give them a list. Many Thanks Simon Cordell file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/32f56c08883d4e0098c6f6f8b77... 11/09/2014 220, FW: Application to
Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802->Lorraine Cordell
Son Cordell.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 25 November 2013 10:06 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin Ø
I have spent all weekend trying
to get hold of the Charlton Car Pound as that is where the police have said
there will hold a list of what was in the van. Ø
The police have told me that
the compound has to make a list of every vehicle that is impounded so it
covers them also so they will have a list. Ø
I have sent 2 emails over the
weekend which I do know they have read as I had tracking on them. Ø
I have spoken to Kelly today
and she has asked me to make sure you have the information for the compound
and can you pass it over to her asap. Also, can you find out from Kelly
Tiller if Simon will be covered after 12.00 today while she gets hold of the
compound please and let us know as soon as possible. Ø
Emails for the compound Ø
charltondocuments@met.police.uk Address and ticket number Charlton Car Pound, 8 Bramshot Avenue, London,
SE7 7HY on the 14/11/2013 tickets No: 01/ J63181495 Charlton Car Pound 0208284866 Ø
I telephone number that I can find. Ø
Van
Reg CX52JRZ and the date was taken in was the 14/11/2013 Ø
I
have also been speaking to Sally Browne, duty inspector at Lambeth police
station, I spoken to her on the 22/11/2013 and the 23/11/2013
when she called me back. I was told that due to this going to court the
police would not be able to talk to us and that they will not be back on duty
till the end of this week and they will be doing night shaft. Ø
CAD
7548/22Nov13 and also CAD 10164/22Nov13 these are the 2 CAD numbers for me
asking to speak to the inspector Silly Browne. Ø
Please
see the read receipts below for the emails I sent over to the compound Your
message To: Austin PAUL R - Services Subject: RE: CX52JRZ Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 5:14:12 PM Ø (UTC) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London was read on Saturday, November 23, 2013 4:41:48 AM (UTC) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London. Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We
are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary. NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be
confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/892c09e27c074f97a8c9258c5a8... 11/09/2014 221, Page 2 of 3 the information in this email without the permission of the sender.
MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Your message To: Guy Rob - CC Services Subject: FW: RE: CX52JRZ Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 1:32:58 PM Ø (UTC) Dublin,
Edinburgh, Lisbon, London was read on
Sunday, November 24, 2013 5:01:36 PM (UTC) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London. Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We
are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary. NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to
copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify
the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to
conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts
no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 24 November 2013 13:33 To: charltondocuments@met.police.uk Subject: FW: RE: CX52JRZ Hello Ø Can anyone please tell
me how I can deal with this issue below Many Thanks file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/892c09e27c074f97a8c9258c5a8... 11/09/2014 222, Page 3 of 3 Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 22 November 2013 17:14 To: vrescharlton@met.police.uk Subject: RE: CX52JRZ To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am writing this email after
calling the police and being told to contract yourselves about a matter I am
trying to sort out. My Van reg CX52 JRZ was impounded to Charlton Car Pound,
8 Bramshot Avenue, London, SE7 7HY on the 14/11/2013 tickets
No: 01/ J63181495 Ø
I have been told by the police
when I called them that each vehicle that is impounded you do a check on to
list what items are in there. Ø
I would like to know how I can
go about getting a list of items that was in my van reg CX52 JRZ as I need
this list to give it to my insurance company. Ø
Or if my insurance company
emails you can you give them a list. Many Thanks Simon Cordell file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/892c09e27c074f97a8c9258c5a8... 11/09/2014 223, FW: Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802->Lorraine Cordell Cordell.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 22 November 2013 16:50 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: [1] RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin Ø
Kelly from KGM has just called
and said that they will keep the cover till Monday at 12.00 for us to have
time to get information from the police that there was in fact no tools in
the van. Ø
Simon has already been on the
phone to the police and been told to contract the compound 6the van was taken
to as they have to check every vehicle that is taken there, Ø
he is at this time on the phone
to the compound in order to try and get the information that KGM needs. Ø
The Compound it was taken to is Charlton vehicle pound 8 Bramshot Avenue, Charlton, London, SE7 7HY Simon From: Martin Jenkin mailto: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 22 November 2013 15:50 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: [1] RE: Simon Cordell Hi Lorraine, Ø Please find
response from your insurers Ø I have
listened to the call that took place between the police and my colleague
Jessica advising that Mr Simon Cordell was carrying tools in his vehicle so
unfortunately, we have no other opportunity but to continue with the cancellation
of the policy. Ø Unfortunately,
the policy will cease as of tomorrow as per the letter from KGM. Ø The only
way to stop this is to either get the Police officer to contact KGM or to get
a signed statement from Ø him before
1700hrs today. Regards Martin From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 22 November 2013 15:15 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin Ø
I made a mistake on the date
that KGM said they were going to close my insurance policy it’s the 23/11/2013 Ø
So, I will need to know today
if I will still be insured as from 23/11/2013 until this matter is
sorted. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 22 November 2013 14:24 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/e8f014d0038a430ebb045cc2ec9... 11/09/2014 224, Page 2 of 3 Ø After the call you made
today and talked to myself Miss Lorraine Cordell, I am sending over the
information you asked for. Ø I do feel also that KMG
asking to speak to the police office is in breach of my data protection, but
I will be willing to write and allow them to do this. Ø As I said to KMG
yesterday on a phone that was made to them when I talked to Kelly Tilley, I
have not been found guilty at a court of law for not having no insurance and
it is for a court of law to find me guilty not a police officer who thinks I
done something when I have not. Ø Even if KGM does speak
to the police office he will still say what he feels and that is not a fact
that I am guilty of anything. Ø To be found guilty it
would have to be done in front of a judge. Ø Also, Martin as you
said on the phone today when you in fact talked to the police on that day not
once did, they say I had anything in my van that would void my insurance, and
in fact I believe at this stage if the police did in fact have proof, they
would have said to you that my van was full of things which is not the case. Ø I would like to also
know if my insurance is going to carry on while this matter is addressed or
if it will be closed down on the 27/11/2013 as the letter says that
KGM have sent me. Ø And if KMG is going to
close down my policy I would like full written conditions of what part of my
policy I have broken. Ø As for the letter of
complain that will be going to the police Simon still has not fully read over
it to make sure there is no errors or anything else that needs adding but it
does go into details as to what went on, it is only for use by yourself and
KGM to read only. Ø Also, as I said on the
phone to you today the police are also telling me that the 3 times that my vehicles were seized and I had to
pay for them to be taken out of the compound, I will
need to claim this back from my insurance company as they had not done
their job and put them on the database so they are at fault not the police. Ø You said to me today
that KGM are looking into this as they are on the database and it should show
up to the police that I am in fact insured. Ø This has not been the
case for me and I have suffered badly due to this and this is the reason I
have to carry my insurance policy at all times so when I get pulled over by
the police, I can show them my documents, as the police say it does not show
up as I am insured, this is also the reason the insurance company have had so
many calls from the police to asked if I am insured or not since my policy
started. Ø Could you please send
me proof that the vehicles where on the database so
I can put the claim in to the police to get my money back for the times my
vehicles were seized. Ø As at this stage I do
not want to have to put a freedom of information act into yourselves or the police
to the number of times that the police have in fact had to call my insurance
company to see if I was insured due to the police saying I was not insured. Ø I have always been very
happy with Broadsure Direct that is why I have still use them and would like
my insurance to carry on under them. From: Lorraine Cordell [ mailto: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø
Can you let me know by email if
I am going to still have insurance as from the 27/11/2013 Ø
please, Ø
I got a letter saying my
insurance will be closed from the 27/11/2013, and I cannot see the
reason for this as I have done nothing wrong. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [ mailto: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/e8f014d0038a430ebb045cc2ec9... 11/09/2014 225, Page 3 of 3 Dear martin Ø
After a next call and talking
to oily he asked me to send over the receipt of me buying the van please see
attached scan. I am waiting for the new logbook to come from DVLA. Simon From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 15 November 2013 13:07 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Martin Ø Today the 15/11/13
I made a call to be able to speak to you with regard to what happened
yesterday the 14/11/2013 with the police. Ø I have talked to Oilly
today and he asked me to write this email to you as they are thinking of
closing my insurance policy. Ø Yesterday I went for a
meeting with the owner of a night club for a future job position the meeting
was set for 14.00 hours. Ø I drove down for my
meeting and got there at around 13.00 hours there were some police at the
roadside doing stops on cars etc, as I drove pass and pulled over to park by
the night club, my friend who was with me got out of the van to get some
drinks and food while I waited in the van, as I got to the club early for my
meeting. Ø The police that were
doing the stops came up to me, they told me they wanted to do some checks on
the van I was sitting in, I asked why, and they told me under the road
traffic act. Ø I then passed the
police my insurance policy for them to go over, the police officer also asked
me why I had stopped there. Ø I explained to him I
had a meeting in the night club that we were outside, as it was due to open
to the public in 1-month time to secure my future position there. Ø While I was there, I
was also planning on asking if there were any painting jobs, I explained all
this to the police officer I was talking to. Ø The police looked
inside the van and clearly saw it was empty and that there were also no signs
on the van showing it to be a company van. Ø But the police officer
was still unhappy. Ø He talked to yourselves
as the insurance company on the phone and was told I was not insured, at what
point I called you myself as my insurance company as I knew I was insured. Ø I explained the
situation to yourselves to be told I was covered for commuting to work,
social and domestic, as well as motor trade, but not for carriage of goods
for a company, which did not matter as my van was empty and still is whilst
being in the police impound. Ø I am putting in a
complaint to the independent complaints commission in regard to the unlawful
seizure of my vehicle. Ø Further to this would
it please be possible to find out the status of my insurance policy and the
reasons as to why I have been told you are in the process of closing my
policy. Yours sincerely Mr Simon Cordell file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/e8f014d0038a430ebb045cc2ec9... 11/09/2014 226, FW: Application to Reopen - Simon P
CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802->Lorraine Cordell_ RE_ REF_ 42_
Urgent.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 25 November 2013 17:12 To: 'Vicky Beale' Subject: RE: REF: 00-COSX14MT04-ID<42> Urgent Hello Vicky Beale Ø
After the call I made to
yourself about the email you sent me Ø
I will go to the compound in
the morning Ø
due to the time now Ø
I would not get there, till very
late due to the tariff Ø
and by the time I got there I
do not believe Kelly Tiller would still be working Ø
so, I will go in the morning Ø
and when I get there, Ø
I will call Kelly. Many Thanks Simon Cordell From: Vicky Beale mailto: vickybeale@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 25 November 2013 16:10 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: FW: REF:
00-COSX14MT04-ID<42> Urgent Importance: High Kind Regards, Vicky Beale Broadsure Direct - Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax
Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as
soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and
reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our
network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. From: Vicky Beale mailto: vickybeale@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 25 November 2013 15:53 To: lorriane32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: REF: 00-COSX14MT04-ID<42> Urgent Importance: High Good Afternoon, file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/2b3bc59100854683a73894b080... 11/09/2014 227, Page 2 of 2 Ø
Can you please ask Simon to
contact me urgently? Ø
as we need him to go to the
compound and when he is there to contact Kelly at KGM on 02085301811, Ø
if he can't do this that we
need a report form from the compound and for him to contact 02071613500 and request a subject access request of report. Kind Regards, Vicky Beale Broadsure Direct - Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax
Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as
soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and
reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/2b3bc59100854683a73894b080... 11/09/2014 228, FW: Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL
(02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802->Lorraine Change Re Simon Cordell.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 26 November 2013 15:46 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Attachments: Data-Protection-KGM.doc. Kelly-Tiller-KGM.doc Hello Martin, Ø
Thank you for the phone call
today to tell me I was still insured. Ø
Could you please pass on the
attached documents to Kelly Tiller at KGM one is a Subject access request
under the Data Protection Act 1998. The other letter is just to get Kelly
Tiller to confirm by email I am in fact still insured so I have this in
writing and also to found out why my van is still not showing up on the
database. Ø
And also, about the logbooks
which I am still waiting for them from DVLA I called DVLA today when I got
back from the compound and was told it can take 8 weeks for me to get the new
logbooks, I will therefore send then right over to you by email as soon as I
get them. Many Thanks Simon Cordell file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/bf6c57d68b364b7a9c556779b77... 30/09/2014 229, FW: Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802->Lorraine Cordell-01.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 December 2013 13:06 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø
I have still not had a reply
from KGM about the data protection or an email from them to say he is in fact
still insured. Ø
And on the Mid database the van
is still showing as not insured, due to this Simon is
not driving the van as he does not want to get pulled again by the police
which I don’t think is right as he has in fact paid his insurance to be able
to drive it if he needs to can this please be sorted out as he really does
not want any more problems with getting pulled over due to it not showing up
as insured. Ø
I also have called DVLA again
about the logbook and have been told that they should be with us soon. Many Thanks Lorraine Many Thanks Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 26 November 2013 15:46 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin, Ø
Thank you for the phone call
today to tell me I was still insured. Ø
Could you please pass on the
attached documents to Kelly Tiller at KGM one is a Subject access request
under the Data Protection Act 1998. The other letter is just to get Kelly
Tiller to confirm by email I am in fact still insured so I have this in
writing and also to found out why my van is still not showing up on the
database. Ø
And also, about the logbooks
which I am still waiting for them from DVLA I called DVLA today when I got
back from the compound and was told it can take 8 weeks for me to get the new
logbooks, I will therefore send then right over to you by email as soon as I
get them. Many Thanks Simon Cordell file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/b809ad443dde47888749f7f2f1c... 30/09/2014 End 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 349. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL
(02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 / Page Numbers: 977,978, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 September 2014 12:47 To: 'Brown W, Pauletta' Subject: RE: Application
to Reopen Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 Attachments: S
Cordell Cert - GE_ 20132014.pdf; Lorraine Cordell FW_ RE_ CX52JRZ.pdf; Lorraine Cordell FW_ RE_ Simon
Cordell.pdf; Lorraine Cordell _RE_ [1] RE_ Simon
Cordell.pdf; Lorraine Cordell _RE_ REF_
00COSX14MT04ID_42_ Urgent.pdf Lorraine Cordell _RE_ Simon Cordell.pdf Lorraine Cordell _RE_ Simon
Cordell01.pdf Dear Miss Brown Ø My son was due to
attend court today at 2pm but he is very unwell as I said on the phone to you
his Nan has just died and he also has crohn's disease and depression, due to
his Nan passing away this has made his crohn's disease come on very bad. Ø We have tried to leave
today to come to the court and had to turn round due to my son needing to
change his things again. Ø Please can this email
be passed to the judge to show why my son cannot attend court today. Ø In addition, please
show the judge my son's insurance documents and all the emails that went back
and forward to the insurance company. Ø Can you please ask the
Officer that checks the documents to call KGM which will show he was insured
and ask him to talk to Kelly Tiller who direct number is in the emails. Ø Can you please get back
to me with an update to this matter and if the judge will set a new date or
deal with this matter today as he will have all the documents needed to show
my son was in fact insured. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Brown-W, Pauletta mailto: pauletta.brown-w@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 18 September 2014 17:08 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: FW: Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802 Ø For your information,
please find letter attached Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS | 176a Lavender Hill, Battersea, London SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 F: 020 7805 1437 | DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Pauletta.Brown-W@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As
of June 2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No:0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice
contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind
the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means." From: Brown W, Pauletta Sent: 18 September 2014 16:09 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk RichmondSouthProsecutions@met.police.uk Cc: LCCC Compliance Unit; LCCC
Enforcement Unit Subject: Application to Reopen Simon P CORDELL
(02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 978, Dear Sirs, Ø Please note that the above case has been relisted for a reopening
hearing on the 30th instant at Lavender Hill Magistrates Court, courtroom 1
at 2 pm. Ø Therefore, please be good enough to have your file in court and can
the LCCC please put this matter on hold until after the hearing, when the
Defendant will attend. Ø Thank you. Regards P Brown Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS
| 176a Lavender Hill, Battersea, London
SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 F: 020 7805 1437 DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Pauletta.Brown-W@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
*Please note: As of June 2nd 2014, our
fax will be GOLDFAX No:0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the
Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other
statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic
means." This e-mail (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you
are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the
sender by return e-mail. Internet
e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted
and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to
send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or
the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 364. GL-SWESTERNMCENQ_RE_
Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 /
Page Numbers: 979, From:
GL-SWESTERNMCENQ
[swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent:
30
September 2014 13:22 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject:
RE: Application
to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 Ø Thank
you for your email which has been passed to our correspondence team please be
aware it may have to be referred to our Legal Team and we will respond to you
as soon as possible. Polite
Request: There is no need to send your correspondence via
post/DX or by fax as this risks the Court duplicating correspondence that has
already been received. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended
only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any
reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please
bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail
(whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and
retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software
may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a
responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding
e-mails and their contents. The
original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications
via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 365. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL
(02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802_ (1) / Page Numbers: 980,981, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 September 2014 13:22 To: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: FW: Application
to Reopen Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802 Attachments: S
Cordell Cert.GE_ 20132014.pdf Lorraine Cordell _ FW_ RE_ CX52JRZ.pdf; Lorraine Cordell _ FW_ RE_ Simon
Cordell.pdf Lorraine Cordell _RE_ [1] RE_ Simon
Cordell.pdf; Lorraine Cordell _ RE_ REF_
00COSX14MT04ID_42_ Urgent.pdf Lorraine Cordell _RE_ SimonCordell.pdf; Lorraine Cordell _RE_ Simon
Cordell01.pdf Dear Miss Brown Ø My son was due to
attend court today at 2pm but he is very unwell as I said on the phone to you
his Nan has just died and he also has crohn's disease and depression, due to
his Nan passing away this has made his crohn's disease come on very bad. Ø We have tried to leave
today to come to the court and had to turn round due to my son needing to
change his things again. Ø Please can this email
be passed to the judge to show why my son cannot attend court today. Ø In addition, please
show the judge my son's insurance documents and all the emails that went back
and forward to the insurance company. Ø Can you please ask the
Officer that checks the documents to call KGM which will show he was insured
and ask him to talk to Kelly Tiller who direct number is in the emails. Ø Can you please get back
to me with an update to this matter and if the judge will set a new date or deal
with this matter today as he will have all the documents needed to show my
son was in fact insured. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Brown W, Pauletta [Mail To: pauletta.brownw@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 18 September 2014 17:08 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: FW: Application
to Reopen Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 For your information, please find
letter attached Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS
| 176a Lavender Hill, Battersea, London
SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 F: 020 7805 1437 DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Pauletta.BrownW@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As of June 2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX
No:0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the
Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other
statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic
means." From: 981, Dear Sirs, Ø Please note that the above case has been relisted
for a reopening hearing on the 30th instant at Lavender Hill Magistrates
Court, courtroom 1 at 2 pm. Ø Therefore, please be good enough to have your
file in court and can the LCCC please put this matter on hold until after the
hearing, when the Defendant will attend. Thank you. Regards P Brown Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS
| 176a Lavender Hill, Battersea, London
SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 F: 020 7805 1437 DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Pauletta.BrownW@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As of June 2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX
No:0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the
Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other
statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic
means." This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the
attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is
not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read
by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send
material in response to this message by email. This email (whether you are
the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the
Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and
email content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure
laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 366. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (19) /
Page Numbers: 982, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 September 2014
15:04 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hello
Martin Ø After Simon has just got off
the phone to you and you saying to him that the full amount would need
to be paid to keep the insurance in place or 2 payments at £700 to
keep it in place. Ø I fill that this is way too
much to ask I have a letter here dated the 26/09/2014 saying that he
has 7 days from that date before the insurance is closed. Ø There have been so many
errors with his insurance even to the fact we never got any documents for
ages as they were left in the fill and forgot to be sent out. Ø So, for ages we never had any
documents so did not know when any payments were due. Ø As you are also aware my
mother passed away and the family has been dealing with that also. Ø There have been many emails
that have been sent to Broadsure and many problems over the last 2 years. Ø Even to the fact from April 2014
when Simon started a next insurance policy that all went wrong also by no
fact of his own, and you making a payment to the said company I fill should
never have been made. Ø Please can you say what is
going on with the insurance policy and if instalments can be made and by how
much as ATM there is no way after paying for a funeral that 2 payments of
£700 can be made. Ø Can you also send him over
his no claims bonus? Regards Lorraine 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 348. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL
(02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 / Page Numbers: 957,958, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 September 2014 13:29 To: 'mandy.skinner@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: FW: Application to Reopen Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 Attachments: S Cordell Cert.GE_ 20132014.pdf; Lorraine Cordell_ RE_ CX52JRZ.pdf; Lorraine Cordell_ RE_ Simon Cordell.pdf; Lorraine Cordell _RE_ [1] RE_ Simon Cordell.pdf; Lorraine Cordell _RE_ REF_ 00COSX14MT04ID_42_ Urgent.pdf Lorraine Cordell _RE_ SimonCordell.pdf; Lorraine Cordell _RE_ Simon Cordell01.pdf Forwarded re phone call From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 September 2014 12:47 To: 'Brown W, Pauletta' Subject: RE: Application to Reopen Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 Dear Miss Brown Ø My son was due to
attend court today at 2pm but he is very unwell as I said on the phone to you
his Nan has just died and he also has crohn's disease and depression, due to
his Nan passing away this has made his crohn's disease come on very bad. Ø We have tried to leave today
to come to the court and had to turn round due to my son needing to change
his things again. Ø Please can this email
be passed to the judge to show why my son cannot attend court today. Ø In addition, please
show the judge my son's insurance documents and all the emails that went back
and forward to the insurance company. Ø Can you please ask the
Officer that checks the documents to call KGM which will show he was insured
and ask him to talk to Kelly Tiller who direct number is in the emails. Ø Can you please get back
to me with an update to this matter and if the judge will set a new date or
deal with this matter today as he will have all the documents needed to show
my son was in fact insured. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Brown W Pauletta [Mail To: pauletta.brownw@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 18 September 2014 17:08 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: FW: Application to Reopen Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 For your information, please find letter attached Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS | 176a Lavender, Battersea, London SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 | F: 020 7805 1437 | DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Paul et ta.Brown W
@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As of June
2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No:0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice
contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind
the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means." 958, From: Brown W, Pauletta Sent: 18 September 2014 16:09 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk RichmondSouthProsecutions@met.police.uk Cc: LCCC Compliance Unit; LCCC Enforcement Unit Subject: Application to Reopen Simon S. P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 Dear Sirs, Please note that the above case has been relisted for a reopening
hearing on the 30th instant at Lavender Hill Magistrates Court, courtroom 1
at 2 pm. Therefore, please be good enough to have your file in court and can
the LCCC please put this matter on hold until after the hearing, when the
Defendant will attend. Thank you. Regards P Brown Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS | 176a Lavender Hill, Battersea, London SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 | F: 020 7805 1437 | DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Pauletta.BrownW@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As of June
2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No:0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice
contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind
the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means." This email
(and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s).
Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If
you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the
sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure medium. Any reply to
this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that
in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by
email. This email (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Email
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content may be read at
any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The original of this email
was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 33. Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 33 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_09.30.2014_FW Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ_001 30/09/2014 /
Page Numbers: 230,231,232,233,234 235,236,237,238,239,240 241,242,243 -- 230, From: Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 30 September 2014 13:22 To: swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: FW: Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802 Attachments: S Cordell Cert._GE_2013-2014.pdf. Lorraine Cordell_ FW RE CX52JRZ.pdf. Lorraine Cordell_ FW RE_SimonCordell.pdf. Lorraine Cordell_ RE [1] RE_ Simon Cordell.pdf. Lorraine Cordell_ RE REF_ 00-COSX14MT04-ID_42_ Urgent.pdf. Lorraine Cordell_ RE Simon Cordell.pdf. Lorraine Cordell_ RE Simon Cordell-01.pdf Dear Miss Brown Ø My son was due to
attend court today at 2pm but he is very unwell as I said on the phone to you
his Nan has just died and he also has crohn's disease and depression, due to
his Nan passing away this has made his crohn's disease come on very bad. Ø We have tried to leave
today to come to the court and had to turn round due to my son needing to
change his things again. Ø Please can this email
be passed to the judge to show why my son cannot attend court today. Ø In addition, please
show the judge my son's insurance documents and all the emails that went back
and forward to the insurance company. Ø Can you please ask the
Officer that checks the documents to call KGM which will show he was insured
and ask him to talk to Kelly Tiller who direct number is in the emails. Ø Can you please get back
to me with an update to this matter and if the judge will set a new date or
deal with this matter today as he will have all the documents needed to show
my son was in fact insured. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Brown-W, Pauletta mailto: pauletta.brown-w@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 18 September 2014 17:08 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: FW: Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH)
1401009802 For your information, please find letter attached Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS | 176a Lavender Hill, Battersea, London SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 F: 020 7805 1437 | DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Pauletta.Brown-W@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Please note: As of June
2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No:0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually,
nor to make representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry
of Justice in any way via electronic means." From: Brown-W, Pauletta Sent: 18 September 2014 16:09 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk RichmondSouthProsecutions@met.police.uk Cc: LCCC Compliance Unit; LCCC Enforcement Unit Subject: Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 231, Dear Sirs, Please note that the above case has been relisted
for a reopening hearing on the 30th instant at Lavender Hill Magistrates
Court, courtroom 1 at 2 pm. Therefore, please be good enough to have your
file in court and can the LCCC please put this matter on hold until after the
hearing, when the Defendant will attend. Thank you. Regards P Brown Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS | 176a Lavender Hill, Battersea, London SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 | F: 020 7805 1437 | DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Pauletta.Brown-W@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As
of June 2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No:0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice
contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind
the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means." This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is
not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at
any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership
with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 232, KGM MOTOR INSURANCE Member of Canopies Group Certificate of Molo; insurance Name of Policy holder Mr SIMON CORDELL Policy Number:
MT3574694 Registration Number of the Vehicle: Any motor vehicle the property of the
Insured or in their custody or control Effective Time and Date for Commencement of the Insurance for the
purposes of the Relevant Law: 0:01 23 February 2013 Expiry Time and Date of the Insurance: 23:59 22 February 2014 -- 233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243, 34. Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 34. lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_09.30.2014_RE Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL (02TJJ 30/09/2014 /
Page Numbers: 244,245,246 247,248,249,250,251,252 253,254,255,256,257,258 -- 244, Dear Miss Brown Ø My son was due to
attend court today at 2pm but he is very unwell as I said on the phone to you
his Nan has just died and he also has crohn's disease and depression, due to
his Nan passing away this has made his crohn's disease come on very bad. Ø We have tried to leave
today to come to the court and had to turn round due to my son needing to
change his things again. Ø Please can this email
be passed to the judge to show why my son cannot attend court today. Ø In addition, please
show the judge my son's insurance documents and all the emails that went back
and forward to the insurance company. Ø Can you please ask the
Officer that checks the documents to call KGM which will show he was insured
and ask him to talk to Kelly Tiller who direct number is in the emails. Ø Can you please get back
to me with an update to this matter and if the judge will set a new date or
deal with this matter today as he will have all the documents needed to show
my son was in fact insured. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Brown-W, Pauletta mailto: pauletta.brown-w@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 18 September 2014 17:08 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: FW: Application to Reopen - Simon P
CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 For your information, please find letter attached Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS | 176a Lavender Hill, Battersea, London SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 | F: 020 7805 1437 | DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Pauletta.Brown-W@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As
of June 2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No:0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually,
nor to make representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry
of Justice in any way via electronic means." From: Brown-W, Pauletta Sent: 18 September 2014 16:09 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk RichmondSouthProsecutions@met.police.uk Cc: LCCC Compliance Unit; LCCC Enforcement
Unit Subject: Application to Reopen - Simon P CORDELL
(02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 30 September 2014 12:47 To: 'Brown-W, Pauletta' Subject: RE: Application to Reopen - Simon P
CORDELL (02TJJ63181495 LAH) 1401009802 Attachments: S Cordell Cert._ GE_ 2013-2014.pdf. Lorraine Cordell_ FW_RE_ CX52JRZ.pdf Lorraine Cordell_ FW_ RE_ Simon Cordell.pdf. Lorraine Cordell_ RE_ [1] RE_ Simon Cordell.pdf. Lorraine Cordell_ RE_ REF_ 00-COSX14MT04-ID_42_ Urgent.pdf. Lorraine Cordell_ RE_ Simon Cordell.pdf. Lorraine Cordell_ RE_ Simon Cordell-01.pdf 245, Dear Sirs, Please note that the above case has been relisted for a reopening
hearing on the 30th instant at Lavender Hill Magistrates Court, courtroom 1
at 2 pm. Therefore, please be good enough to have your file in court and can
the LCCC please put this matter on hold until after the hearing, when the
Defendant will attend. Thank you. Regards P Brown Pauletta Brown | Admin Officer | HMCTS | 176a Lavender Hill, Battersea, London SW11 1JU T: 020 7805 1467 | F: 020 7805 1437 | DX 58559 Clapham Junction | E: Pauletta.Brown-W@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk *Please note: As
of June 2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No:0870 324 0299* "I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice
contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind
the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means." This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is
not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at
any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership
with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 246, KGM MOTOR INSURANCE Member of Canopies Group Certificate of Molo; insurance Name of Policy holder Mr SIMON CORDELL Policy Number:
MT3574694 Registration Number of the Vehicle: Any motor vehicle the property of the
Insured or in their custody or control Effective Time and Date for Commencement of the Insurance for the
purposes of the Relevant Law: 0:01 23 February 2013 Expiry Time and Date of the Insurance: 23:59 22 February 2014 -- 247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258, |
||||||||
Simulation October 2014 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
October
2014 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 367. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (18) / Page
Numbers: 1001 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 4 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 368. Martin Jenkin _RE_
Simon Cordell / Page
Numbers: 1002,1003 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
01/10/2014 |
|
|
|
3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 367. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (18) /
Page Numbers: 1001, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 01 October 2014 15:35 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi
Martin Ø Can you please get back to me
by email with an update as to Simon insurance and where it stands after the
call? Ø you made to me yesterday 30/09/14
you said you was going to get back to me with what was acceptable as a
payment option. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 September 2014 15:04 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hello Martin Ø After Simon has just got off the phone to you and you saying to him
that the full amount would need to be paid to keep the insurance in
place or 2 payments at £700 to keep it in place. Ø I fill that this is way too much to ask I have a letter here dated the
26/09/2014 saying that he has 7 days from that date before the
insurance is closed. Ø There have been so many errors with his insurance even to the fact we
never got any documents for ages as they were left in the fill and forgot to
be sent out. Ø So, for ages we never had any documents so did not know when any
payments were due. Ø As you are also aware my mother passed away and the family has been
dealing with that also. Ø There have been many emails that have been sent to Broadsure and many
problems over the last 2 years. Ø Even to the fact from April 2014 when Simon started a next
insurance policy that all went wrong also by no fact of his own, and you
making a payment to the said company I fill should never have been made. Ø Please can you say what is going on with the insurance policy and if
instalments can be made and by how much as ATM there is no way after paying
for a funeral that 2 payments of £700 can be made. Ø Can you also send him over his no claims bonus? Regards Lorraine 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 368. Martin Jenkin _RE_ Simon
Cordell /
Page Numbers: 1002,1003, From:
Martin
Jenkin [martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent:
01
October 2014 16:20 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Lorraine, Ø I am currently looking to see
if I can re setup the direct debit on a recourse basis, Ø I will be back in contact
shortly Ø Regards Martin
Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 t:
01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843 594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488. This
e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the
person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and
confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must
not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible
and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the
right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our network.
Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 01 October 2014 15:35 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø Can you please get back to me by email with an update as to Simon
insurance and where it stands after the call you made to me yesterday 30/09/14
you said you was going to get back to me with what was acceptable as a
payment option. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 September 2014 15:04 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin Ø After Simon has just got off the phone to you and you saying to him
that the full amount would need to be paid to 1003, Ø keep the insurance in place or 2 payments at £700 to keep it in place. Ø I fill that this is way too much to ask I have a letter here dated the
26/09/2014 saying that he has 7 days from that date before the
insurance is closed. Ø There have been so many errors with his insurance even to the fact we
never got any documents for ages as they were left in the fill and forgot to
be sent out. Ø So, for ages we never had any documents so did not know when any
payments were due. Ø As you are also aware my mother passed away and the family has been
dealing with that also. Ø There have been many emails that have been sent to Broadsure and many
problems over the last 2 years. Ø Even to the fact from April 2014 when Simon started a next
insurance policy that all went wrong also by no fact of his own, and you
making a payment to the said company I fill should never have been made. Ø Please can you say what is going on with the insurance policy and if
instalments can be made and by how much as ATM there is no way after paying
for a funeral that 2 payments of £700 can be made. Ø Can you also send him over his no claims bonus? Regards Lorraine |
||||
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 369. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (17) / Page
Numbers: 1004,1005 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
02/10/2014 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 369. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (17) / Page Numbers: 1004,1005, From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
02
October 2014 09:32 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Ø Thank you Regards
Lorraine
From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To:martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 01 October 2014 16:20 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Lorraine, Ø I am currently looking to see if I can re setup the direct debit on a
recourse basis, Ø I will be back in contact shortly Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 cid: image001.png@01CC9FAC. (t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential
and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed.
It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you are not the
intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in
reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to
the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we
are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications passing
through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 01 October 2014 15:35 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Ø Can you please get back to me by email with an update as to Simon
insurance and where it stands after the call you made to me yesterday 30/09/14
you said you was going to get back to me with what was acceptable as a
payment option. 1005, Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 30 September 2014 15:04 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin Ø After Simon has just got off the phone to you and you saying to him
that the full amount would need to be paid to keep the insurance in
place or 2 payments at £700 to keep it in place. Ø I fill that this is way too much to ask I have a letter here dated the
26/09/2014 saying that he has 7 days from that date before the
insurance is closed. Ø There have been so many errors with his insurance even to the fact we
never got any documents for ages as they were left in the fill and forgot to
be sent out. Ø So, for ages we never had any documents so did not know when any
payments were due. Ø As you are also aware my mother passed away and the family has been
dealing with that also. Ø There have been many emails that have been sent to Broadsure and many
problems over the last 2 years. Ø Even to the fact from April 2014 when Simon started a next
insurance policy that all went wrong also by no fact of his own, and you
making a payment to the said company I fill should never have been made. Ø Please can you say what is going on with the insurance policy and if
instalments can be made and by how much as ATM there is no way after paying
for a funeral that 2 payments of £700 can be made. Ø Can you also send him over his no claims bonus? Regards Lorraine |
||||
|
|
|
03/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
06/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 370. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (16) / Page
Numbers: 1008,1009 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 371. Martin Jenkin _RE_
Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page
Numbers: 1010,1011,1012 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 372. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (15) / Page
Numbers: 1013,1014,1015 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
07/10/2014 |
|
|
|
3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 370. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (16) /
Page Numbers: 1008,1009, From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
07
October 2014 18:03 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Hi
Martin Ø Is there any news about the
payment yet? Regards
Lorraine
From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To:martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 01 October 2014 16:20 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Lorraine, Ø I am currently looking to see if I can re setup the direct debit on a
recourse basis, Ø I will be back in contact shortly Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488. This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you
are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any
action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note
that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications
passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by
the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 01 October 2014 15:35 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø Can you please get back to me by email with an update as to Simon
insurance and where it stands after the call you made to me yesterday 30/09/14
you said you was going to get back to me with what was acceptable as a
payment option. 1009, Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 30 September 2014 15:04 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin Ø After Simon has just got off the phone to you and you saying to him
that the full amount would need to be paid to keep the insurance in
place or 2 payments at £700 to keep it in place. Ø I fill that this is way too much to ask I have a letter here dated the
26/09/2014 saying that he has 7 days from that date before the
insurance is closed. Ø There have been so many errors with his insurance even to the fact we
never got any documents for ages as they were left in the fill and forgot to
be sent out. Ø So, for ages we never had any documents so did not know when any
payments were due. Ø As you are also aware my mother passed away and the family has been
dealing with that also. Ø There have been many emails that have been sent to Broadsure and many
problems over the last 2 years. Ø Even to the fact from April 2014 when Simon started a next
insurance policy that all went wrong also by no fact of his own, and you
making a payment to the said company I fill should never have been made. Ø Please can you say what is going on with the insurance policy and if
instalments can be made and by how much as ATM there is no way after paying
for a funeral that 2 payments of £700 can be made. Ø Can you also send him over his no claims bonus? Regards Lorraine 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 371. Martin Jenkin _RE_ Simon
Cordell_ (1) /
Page Numbers: 1010,1011,1012, From:
Martin
Jenkin [martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent:
07
October 2014 18:10 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Ø Could you confirm the bank
details and I will reset the direct debit up? Ø Once set up I will confirm
the payment dates and we need to make sure the payment goes through Regards
Martin
Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 t:
01843 594477 f:
01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843 594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488. This
e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the
person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and
confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must
not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible
and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the
right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure
Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 07 October 2014 18:03 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Is there any news about the payment
yet? Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin Mail To: martinienkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 01 October 2014 16:20 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Lorraine, Ø I am currently looking to see if I can re setup the direct debit on a
recourse basis, Ø I will be back in contact shortly 1011, Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 cid: image001.png@01CC9FAC. ( t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you
are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any
action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note
that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications
passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by
the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 01 October 2014 15:35 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø Can you please get back to me by email with an update as to Simon
insurance and where it stands after the call you made to me yesterday 30/09/14
you said you was going to get back to me with what was acceptable as a
payment option. Regards Lorraine From:
Lorraine
Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent:
30
September 2014 15:04 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Hello
Martin Ø After Simon has just got off the phone to you and you saying to him
that the full amount would need to be paid to keep the insurance in
place or 2 payments at £700 to keep it in place. Ø I fill that this is way too much to ask I have a letter here dated the
26/09/2014 saying that he has 7 days from that date before the
insurance is closed. Ø There have been so many errors with his insurance even to the fact we
never got any documents for ages as they were left in the fill and forgot to
be sent out. Ø So, for ages we never had any documents so did not know when any
payments were due. Ø As you are also aware my mother passed away and the family has been
dealing with that also. Ø There have been many emails that have been sent to Broadsure and many
problems over the last 2 years. 1012, Ø Even to the fact from April 2014 when Simon started a next
insurance policy that all went wrong also by no fact of his own, and you
making a payment to the said company I fill should never have been made. Ø Please can you say what is going on with the insurance policy and if
instalments can be made and by how much as ATM there is no way after paying
for a funeral that 2 payments of £700 can be made. Ø Can you also send him over his no claims bonus? Regards Lorraine 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 372. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (15) /
Page Numbers: 1013,1014,1015, From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
07
October 2014 18:44 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Hi
Martin Ø I will get them over to you tomorrow
as Simon is not here ATM, Ø I will also make a payment
over the phone if that is ok with you. Regards
Lorraine
From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To:martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 07
October 2014 18:10 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Ø Could you confirm the bank details and I will reset the direct debit
up? Ø Once set up I will confirm the payment dates and we need to make sure
the payment goes through Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 cid: image001.png@01CC9FAC. ( t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you
are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any
action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note
that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications
passing through our network. Broadsure
Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 07 October 2014 18:03 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi
Martin Ø Is there any news about the
payment yet? Regards 1014, Lorraine
From:
Martin
Jenkin Mail To: martinienkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent:
01
October 2014
16:20 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Lorraine, Ø I am currently looking to see if I can re setup the direct debit on a
recourse basis, Ø I will be back in contact shortly Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 cid: image001.png@01CC9FAC. (t: 01843 594477 (f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you
are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any
action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note
that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications
passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by
the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 01 October 2014 15:35 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø Can you please get back to me by email with an update as to Simon
insurance and where it stands after the call you made to me yesterday 30/09/2014 you said you was going to get back to me with what was
acceptable as a payment option. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 30 September 2014 15:04 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell 1015, Hello Martin Ø After Simon has just got off the phone to you and you saying to him that
the full amount would need to be paid to keep the insurance in place or
2 payments at £700 to keep it in place. Ø I fill that this is way too much to ask I have a letter here dated the
26/09/2014 saying that he has 7 days from that date before the insurance
is closed. Ø There have been so many errors with his insurance even to the fact we
never got any documents for ages as they were left in the fill and forgot to
be sent out. Ø So, for ages we never had any documents so did not know when any
payments were due. Ø As you are also aware my mother passed away and the family has been
dealing with that also. Ø There have been many emails that have been sent to Broadsure and many
problems over the last 2 years. Ø Even to the fact from April 2014 when Simon started a next
insurance policy that all went wrong also by no fact of his own, and you
making a payment to the said company I fill should never have been made. Ø Please can you say what is going on with the insurance policy and if
instalments can be made and by how much as ATM there is no way after paying
for a funeral that 2 payments of £700 can be made. Ø Can you also send him over his no claims bonus? Regards Lorraine |
||||
|
35. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 35 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_10.08.2014_RE RE urgent
Simon CORDELL 011401596899 08/10/2014 / Page Numbers: 259,260,261 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 373. GL-BRENTMCENQ_RE_ urgent
Simon CORDELL 011401596899_ (2) / Page
Numbers: 1024 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Driving - Case No –
011401596899 - On 01/01/2014 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 374. Lorraine Cordell _Re
_ urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899 / Page
Numbers: 1025,1026,1027 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Driving - Case No –
011401596899 - On 01/01/2014 |
08/10/2014 |
18:24:00 |
X4 259,260,261 |
|
|
35. Additional Email
Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 35 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_10.08.2014_RE RE urgent
Simon CORDELL 011401596899 08/10/2014 / Page Numbers: 259,260,261 -- 259, From: Lorraine Cordell
<lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 08 October 2014
18:24 To: 'gl-brentmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: RE: RE: urgent
Simon CORDELL 011401596899 Attachments: S Cordell Cert_ GE_
2013-2014.pdf Dear sir or Madam Ø
I am writing this
email due to the reply dated the 01/10/2014 I got in the post on 06/10/2014
about the email I sent to you on the 12/09/2014 Ø
please see below
email dated 12/09/2014.
End of Picture! Ø
Above is a picture
of the reply where you say I have 21 days to file a statutory declaration due
to me being unaware of the court processing. Ø
I did not know about
this court case. Ø I have been wrongfully
convicted and have points on my licence, which should not be there. Ø In the email dated the 12/09/2014,
I asked for my case to be listed in order that I could do the following Ø Application to set aside the
conviction and Re-open the case 260, Ø The reason for this is because I
have been wrongfully convicted as I did in fact have insurance. Ø As shown in the attached file. Ø Please can you list my case in
court so I can put the Application to set aside the conviction, Re-open the
case that I have been wrongfully convicted for. Ø This matter is urgent. Ø I cannot resolve this matter
until the case is listed before either a District Judge or Magistrates so I
would appreciate your cooperation. Ø This is causing me stress. Ø
Can you please
resolve this legal matter by listing the case for an application to set aside
the conviction? Ø
I can then forward
my documents to the relevant prosecuting authority. Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 12 September 2014 15:11 To: gl-brentmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899 Dear Sir or Madam Ø I have tried to call
the court on a number of occasions regarding my conviction and sentence for
no insurance but the phone just rings when I press the number given to ask
about this case the telephone number, I am calling is 0208 955 0555. Ø I have now found out
the information to the case but pressing number 7 the lady I spoke to did in
fact try and put me to a manager but that also just ring then cut me off. Ø So, I called back again
and asked her if she could give me the information which she did. Ø I am making this
request to have my case listed in order that I can do the following. Ø Application to set
aside the conviction, Re-open the case My name: Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981. Address: 109 Burncroft Av Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ Case No: 011401596899 Application to set aside the conviction: - Ø On 01/01/2014 I was stopped by the police as they did not
believe that I held a valid policy of insurance. Due to this being a holiday
my insurance company was closed so the police could not check if I was in
fact was insured, I was insured and asked the police to check there records
due to the number of problems I had had with my insurance not showing on the
MID database and being stopped do many times they did this and could in fact
see many times but still impounded my van reg CX52 JRZ. Ø After the holidays I went to the compound and had to again pay for my
Van to be taken out of the compound. Ø I never received any summons in relation to this matter and I only
became aware that the case had been dealt with in my absence when I received
a letter from the DVLA advising me that I had to send in my driving
licence. I disputed with the DVLA the points, but I was 261, Ø given an ultimatum that if I did not send in my licence it would be
revoked. Ø The offence of no insurance was allegedly committed on 01/01/2014.
Ø I had a valid policy of insurance from 23/02/2013 and this policy
was valid until 22/02/2014 Ø The company insuring me was KGM, and my broker was Broadsure direct I
am the named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell and my policy number is
MT3574694. Ø I have points on my licence which I should not have. Ø Can you please as a matter of urgency email me back on this matter so
that I can have a date so that the conviction can be set aside and my case
heard in order that I can show the court my insurance and the PLO can make
the necessary enquiries. Ø I would be grateful if you can inform DVLA that this matter and the
points that have been added to my licence is being disputed so this can be
put on hold as I do not see why I should suffer when I have done nothing
wrong and I was insured to drive. Ø This is in fact have a big effect on my life when I have done nothing
wrong and would like this addressed as a matter of urgency. Ø This matter is urgent. Ø I cannot resolve this matter until the case is listed before either a
District Judge or Magistrates so I would appreciate your cooperation. Ø I am very disappointed that you have ignored all my emails. Ø This is causing me stress. Ø Can you now please resolve this legal mater by listing the case for an
application to set aside the conviction? Ø I can then forward my documents to the relevant prosecuting
authority. Ø Please see attached my insurance documents for this offence in fact
showing I was in fact insured. Ø I await hearing from you in relation to this matter and I thank you in
advance for your anticipated co-operation
in this matter. Yours faithfully Simon Cordell 261+ KGM MOTOR INSURANCE Member of Canopies Group Certificate of Molo; insurance Name of Policy holder Mr SIMON CORDELL Policy Number:
MT3574694 Registration Number of the Vehicle: Any motor vehicle the property of the
Insured or in their custody or control Effective Time and Date for Commencement of the Insurance for the
purposes of the Relevant Law: 0:01 23 February 2013 Expiry Time and Date of the Insurance: 23:59 22 February 2014 End 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 373. GL-BRENTMCENQ_RE_ urgent
Simon CORDELL 011401596899_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1024, From:
GL-BRENTMCENQ [gl-brentmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 08
October 2014 18:24 To: Lorraine
Cordell Subject: RE: urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899 Ø Thank you for e-mailing the North West and West London Magistrates'
Courts Administration Centre. Ø Please be aware that it has been received and will be processed. Polite Request: Please refrain
from also sending your correspondence via post/DX or by fax as this risks the
Court duplicating correspondence that has already been received. Thank you
for your co-operation. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is
not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a
secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by
someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material
in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the
sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry
of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The
original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 374. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899 /
Page Numbers: 1025,1026,1027, Ø I am writing this email due
to the reply dated the 01/10/2014 I got in the post on 06/10/2014 about
the email I sent to you on the 12/09/2014 please see below email dated
12/09/2014. 1026, Ø Above is a picture of the
reply where you say I have 21 days to file a statutory declaration due to me
being unaware of the court processing. Ø I did not know about this
court case. Ø I have been wrongfully
convicted and have points on my licence, which should not be there. Ø In the email dated the 12/09/2014,
I asked for my case to be listed in order that I could do the following Application to set aside the conviction Ø Re-open the case Ø The reason for this is
because I have been wrongfully convicted as I did in fact have insurance. Ø As shown in the attached
file. 1027, Ø Broadsure direct I am the
named policy holder, Mr. Simon Cordell and my policy number are MT3574694.I
have points on my licence which I should not have. Ø Can you please as a matter of
urgency email me back on this matter so that I can have a date so that the
conviction can be set aside and my case heard in order that I can show the
court my insurance and the PLO can make the necessary enquiries. Ø I would be grateful if you
can inform DVLA that this matter and the points that have been added to my
licence is being disputed so this can be put on hold as I do not see why I
should suffer when I have done nothing wrong and I was insured to drive. Ø This is in fact have a big
effect on my life when I have done nothing wrong and would like this
addressed as a matter of urgency. Ø This matter is urgent. Ø I cannot resolve this matter
until the case is listed before either a District Judge or Magistrates so I
would appreciate your cooperation. Ø This is causing me stress. Ø Can you now please resolve
this legal mater by listing the case for an application to set aside the
conviction? Ø I can then forward my
documents to the relevant prosecuting authority. Ø Please see attached my
insurance documents for this offence in fact showing I was in fact insured. Ø I await hearing from you in
relation to this matter and I thank you in advance for your anticipated
cooperation in this matter. Yours
faithfully Simon Cordell |
||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 375. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (14) / Page
Numbers: 1028,1029,1030 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
09/10/2014 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 375. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (14) /
Page Numbers: 1028,1029,1030, From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
09
October 2014 15:15 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Hi
Martin Ø Sorry for the delay in getting the information Barclays Bank Mr Simon
P Cordell Ø That is the info you needed Ø Can you let me know when the 1st payment will come out and how much
for please and how much each payment is for and what date? Regards
Lorraine
From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To:martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 07 October 2014 18:10 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Ø Could you confirm the bank details and I will reset the direct debit
up? Ø Once set up I will confirm the payment dates and we need to make sure
the payment goes through Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 cid: image001.png@01CC9FAC. t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you
are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any
action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note
that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications
passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by
the Financial Conduct Authority. 1029, From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 07 October 2014 18:03 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø Is there any news about the payment yet? Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To: martinienkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 01 October 2014 16:20 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Lorraine, Ø I am currently looking to see if I can re setup the direct debit on a
recourse basis, Ø I will be back in contact shortly Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488. This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you
are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any
action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note
that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications
passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by
the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 01 October 2014 15:35 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø Can you please get back to me by email with an update as to Simon
insurance and where it stands after the call? 1030, Ø you made to me yesterday 30/09/14 you said you was going to get
back to me with what was acceptable as a payment option. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 September 2014 15:04 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hello Martin Ø After Simon has just got off the phone to you and you saying to him
that the full amount would need to be paid to keep the insurance in
place or 2 payments at £700 to keep it in place. Ø I fill that this is way too much to ask I have a letter here dated the
26/09/2014 saying that he has 7 days from that date before the
insurance is closed. Ø There have been so many errors with his insurance even to the fact we
never got any documents for ages as they were left in the fill and forgot to
be sent out. Ø So, for ages we never had any documents so did not know when any
payments were due. Ø As you are also aware my mother passed away and the family has been
dealing with that also. Ø There have been many emails that have been sent to Broadsure and many
problems over the last 2 years. Ø Even to the fact from April 2014 when Simon started a next
insurance policy that all went wrong also by no fact of his own, and you
making a payment to the said company I fill should never have been made. Ø Please can you say what is going on with the insurance policy and if
instalments can be made and by how much as ATM there is no way after paying
for a funeral that 2 payments of £700 can be made. Ø Can you also send him over his no claims bonus? Regards Lorraine |
||||
|
|
|
10/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 376. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (13) / Page Numbers: 1042,1043,1044 Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
14/10/2014 |
|
|
|
3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 376. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (13) /
Page Numbers: 1042,1043,1044, From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
14
October 2014 10:15 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Ø Can you get back to me with the payment
details for Simon and how much each month and when the 1st payment will be
due out of his account please. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 09 October 2014 15:15 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø Sorry for the delay in getting the information
Barclays Bank Mr Simon P Cordell Ø That is the info you needed. Ø Can you let me know when the 1st payment will
come out and how much for please and how much each payment is for and what
date? Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To:martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 07 October 2014 18:10 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Ø Could you confirm the bank details and I will
reset the direct debit up? Ø Once set up I will confirm the payment dates and
we need to make sure the payment goes through Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843
598744 1043, t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you
are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any
action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note
that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications
passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by
the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 07 October 2014 18:03 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø Is there any news about the payment yet? Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To: martinienkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 01 October 2014 16:20 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Lorraine, Ø I am currently looking to see if I can re setup the direct debit on a recourse
basis, Ø I will be back in contact shortly Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488. This e-mail transmission is strictly
confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is
addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you
are not the intended recipient, 1044, you must not copy, distribute, or take
any action in reliance on it. If you have received this e‐mail
in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the
message. Please note that we are able to, and
reserve the right to, monitor e‐mail communications passing through our
network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial
Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 01 October 2014 15:35 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Ø Can you please get back to me by email with an update as to Simon
insurance and where it stands after the call? Ø you made to me yesterday 30/09/14 you said you was going to get
back to me with what was acceptable as a payment option. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 September 2014 15:04 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hello Martin Ø After Simon has just got off the phone to you and you saying to him
that the full amount would need to be paid to keep the insurance in
place or 2 payments at £700 to keep it in place. Ø I fill that this is way too much to ask I have a letter here dated the
26/09/2014 saying that he has 7 days from that date before the
insurance is closed. Ø There have been so many errors with his insurance even to the fact we
never got any documents for ages as they were left in the fill and forgot to
be sent out. Ø So, for ages we never had any documents so did not know when any
payments were due. Ø As you are also aware my mother passed away and the family has been
dealing with that also. Ø There have been many emails that have been sent to Broadsure and many
problems over the last 2 years. Ø Even to the fact from April 2014 when Simon started a next
insurance policy that all went wrong also by no fact of his own, and you
making a payment to the said company I fill should never have been made. Ø Please can you say what is going on with the insurance policy and if
instalments can be made and by how much as ATM there is no way after paying
for a funeral that 2 payments of £700 can be made. Ø Can you also send him over his no claims bonus? Regards Lorraine Lorraine |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
15/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 377. DVLA Email _Re_ Email
DVLA - Vehicles Form 106 (KMM6181228V93001L0KM) / Page
Numbers: 1046 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! DVLA |
20/10/2014 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 377. DVLA
Email _Re_ Email DVLA - Vehicles Form 106 (KMM6181228V93001L0KM) /
Page Numbers: 1046, From:
DVLA
Email donotreply.contactcentre@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent:
20
October 2014 09:16 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Re: Email DVLA - Vehicles
Form 106 (KMM6181228V93001L0KM) Dear
Mr Cordell Ø Thank you for your email received on 16/10/14. Ø Your email reference number is 2455506. Ø If you have received a penalty letter from DVLA you
should follow the instructions on the letter you have received. If, however,
you believe there are circumstances which should be brought to the attention
of the enforcement centre, you must put these in writing using "the
statement" section on the reverse of the penalty letter. This
information will then be considered before any further action is taken on
this individual enforcement case. You
should receive a response to any appeal within 2-4 weeks. Do
not reply to this email. If
you wish to contact us again about this response, then please use our “Reply
Form” or copy and paste the following URL in to your browser: https://emaildvla.direct.gov.uk/emaildvla/cegemail/dvla/en/reply_form_vehicles.html When
filling in the form the email reference number 2455506 will be required. Regards
S
Hudson DVLA
Contact Centre Find
out about DVLA's online services at: Use
our free vehicle enquiry service to view vehicle information held on DVLA
records. Twitter:
@dvlagov.uk The
original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec.
(CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus
free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. |
||||
|
|
6 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 378. DVLA Email _Re_
Email DVLA – Reply Form 114
(KMM6197227V94808L0KM) / Page
Numbers: 1058,1059 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! DVLA |
21/10/2014 |
|
|
|
7 = 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 378. DVLA Email _Re_ Email
DVLA - Reply Form 114 (KMM6197227V94808L0KM) /
Page Numbers: 1058,1059, From: DVLA Email donotreply.contactcentre@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 21 October 2014 13:34 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Re: Email DVLA Reply Form 114
(KMM6197227V94808L0KM) Dear Mr Cordell Ø
Thank you for your
email received on 20/10/14. Ø
Your email reference
number is 2465589. Ø
If you have received a penalty from DVLA,
this suggests that you are still showing as the registered keeper of the
vehicle. Ø
We are unable to
accept notification of disposal by email as a signature is required. Ø
You will need to
write or fax to the address below quoting the registration number, make/model
of the vehicle, the exact date of sale/transfer/scrapping and the
name/address of the new keeper/motor trader/scrap dealer. Please write or fax to: Vehicles Customer Services DVLA Swansea SA99
1BD Fax: 01792 782381 Please note we are issuing
automatic acknowledgement letters to confirm that keepers are no longer
responsible for the vehicle. If you do not receive the confirmation letter
within 4 weeks, please contact us. If you have received a penalty letter from
DVLA you should follow the instructions on the letter you have received. If,
however, you believe there are circumstances which should be brought to the
attention of the enforcement centre, you must put these in writing using
"the statement" section on the reverse of the penalty letter. This
information will then be considered before any further action is taken on
this individual enforcement case. You should receive a response to any appeal
within 24 weeks. Do not reply to this email.
If you wish to contact us again about this response, then please use us Reply Form or copy and paste
the following URL into your browser: https://emaildvla.direct.gov.uk/emaildvla/cegemail/dvla/en/reply_form_vehicles.html When filling in the form the
email reference number 2465589 will be required. Regards J
Keaveny DVLA
Contact Centre Find
out about DVLA's online services at: Use
our free vehicle enquiry service to view vehicle information held on DVLA
records. Twitter:
@dvla.gov.uk 1059, The original of this email
was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. |
||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 386. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (12) / Page
Numbers: 1140,1141,1142,1143 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 387. Martin Jenkin _RE_
Simon Cordell_ (2) / Page
Numbers: 1144,1145,1146,1147 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 388. Lorraine
Cordell _RE_ Simon Cordell_ (11) / Page Numbers: 1148,1149,1150,1151 Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank! 4 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 389.
Martin Jenkin _RE_ Simon Cordell_ (3) /
Page Numbers: 1152,1153,1154,1155,1156 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
22/10/2014 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 386. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (12) /
Page Numbers: 1140,1141,1142,1143, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 October 2014 11:53 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Hi martin Ø Can you please get back to me
about payment we do not know any details and have had no letters? Ø I have
money here to make payment? Ø Can you please get back to me
today so that I know Simon insurance will not be stopped? Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 14 October 2014 10:15 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø Can you get back
to me with the payment details for Simon and how much each month and when the
1st payment will be due out of his account please. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 09 October 2014 15:15 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø Sorry for the delay in getting the information Barclays Bank Mr Simon
P Cordell Ø That is the info you needed Ø Can you let me know when the 1st payment will come out and how much
for please and how much each payment is for and what date? Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To:martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 07 October 2014 18:10 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' 1141, Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Could you confirm the bank details and I will reset the direct debit
up? Once set up I will confirm the payment dates and we need to make sure
the payment goes through Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This e‐mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended
solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e‐mail in error, please reply to the
sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we are
able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e‐mail communications
passing through our network. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 07 October 2014 18:03 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Is there any news about the payment
yet? Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To:martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 01 October 2014 16:20 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Lorraine, I am currently looking to see if I can re setup the direct debit on a
recourse basis, I will be back in contact shortly Regards 1142, Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This e‐mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended
solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e‐mail in error, please reply to the
sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we are
able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e‐mail communications
passing through our network. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 01 October 2014 15:35 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Can you please get back to me by email with an update as to Simon
insurance and where it stands after the call? you made to me yesterday 30/09/14 you said you was going to get back
to me with what was acceptable as a payment option. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 September 2014 15:04 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hello Martin After Simon has just got off the phone to you and you saying to him
that the full amount would need to be paid to keep the insurance in place or
2 payments at £700 to keep it in place. I fill that this is way too much to
ask I have a letter here dated the 26/09/2014 saying that he has 7 days from
that date before the insurance is closed. There have been so many errors with
his insurance even to the fact we never got any documents for ages as they
were left in the fill and forgot to be sent out. So, for ages we never had
any documents so did not know when any payments were due. As you are also
aware my mother passed away and the family has been dealing with that also.
There have been many emails that have been sent to Broadsure and many
problems over the last 2 years. Even to the fact from April 2014 when Simon
started a next insurance policy that all went wrong also by no fact of his
own, and you making a payment to the said company I fill should never have
been made. 1143, Please can you say what is going on with the insurance policy and if
instalments can be made and by how much as ATM there is no way after paying
for a funeral that 2 payments of £700 can be made. Can you also send him over his no claims
bonus? Regards Lorraine 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 387. Martin Jenkin _RE_ Simon
Cordell_ (2) /
Page Numbers: 1144,1145,1146,1147, From: Martin Jenkin [martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 22 October 2014 12:10 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Lorraine, Ø
Looking at the
agreement the Direct debit the payment schedule looks like the below, Ø
we need to make sure
the payment goes through as failure will result in the Facility being
withdrawn. Alternatively, Ø
I can process the
payment by card to ensure it goes through prior
Direct
Debit Unblocked £328.45
Direct
Debit Unblocked £149.21
Direct
Debit Unblocked £149.21
Direct
Debit Unblocked £149.21
Direct
Debit Unblocked £149.21
Direct
Debit Unblocked £149.21
Direct
Debit Unblocked £149.21
Direct
Debit Unblocked £149.21
Direct
Debit Unblocked £149.21
Direct
Debit Unblocked £149.21 Regards Martin
Jenkin DDI
01843 598744 t:
01843 594477 f:
01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure
Direct Telephone number: 01843 594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This e‐mail
transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the person or
organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and
confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must
not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this e‐mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as
possible and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve
the right to, monitor e‐mail communications passing through us network. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Is
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22
October 2014 11:53 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi martin Ø Can you please get back
to me about payment we do not know any details and have had no letters? Ø I have money here to make payment? Ø Can you please get back
to me today so that I know Simon insurance will not be stopped? Regards Lorraine 1145, From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 14 October 2014 10:15 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Ø Can you get back to me with the payment details for Simon and how much each month and when
the 1st payment will be due out of his account please. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 09 October 2014 15:15 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Ø Sorry for the delay in getting the information Barclays Bank Mr Simon
P Cordell Ø That is the info you needed Ø Can you let me know when the 1st payment will come out and how much
for please and how much each payment is for and what date? Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 07 October 2014 18:10 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Could you confirm the bank details and I will reset the direct debit
up, Once set up, I will confirm the payment dates and we need to make sure
the payment goes through Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This e‐mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended
solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take 1146, any action in reliance on it. If you have received this e‐mail
in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the
message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e‐mail
communications passing through our network. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 07 October 2014 18:03 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Is there any news about the payment
yet? Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 01 October 2014 16:20 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Lorraine, I am currently looking to see if I can re setup the direct debit on a
recourse basis, I will be back in contact shortly Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 cid: image001.png@01CC9FAC.C5567270 t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This e‐mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended
solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e‐mail in error, please reply to the
sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we are
able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e‐mail communications
passing through our network. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 01 October 2014 15:35 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Can you please get back to me by email with an update as to Simon
insurance and where it stands after the call you made to me yesterday
30/09/14 you said you was going to get back to me with what was acceptable as
a payment option. Regards Lorraine 1147, From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 30 September 2014 15:04 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hello Martin After Simon has just got off the phone to you and you saying to him
that the full amount would need to be paid to keep the insurance in place or
2 payments at £700 to keep it in place. I fill that this is way too much to
ask I have a letter here dated the 26/09/2014 saying that he has 7
days from that date before the insurance is closed. There have been so many
errors with his insurance even to the fact we never got any documents for
ages as they were left in the fill and forgot to be sent out. So, for ages we
never had any documents so did not know when any payments were due. As you are also aware my mother passed away
and the family has been dealing with that also. There have been many emails
that have been sent to Broadsure and many problems over the last 2 years.
Even to the fact from April 2014 when Simon started a next insurance policy
that all went wrong also by no fact of his own, and you making a payment to
the said company I fill should never have been made. Please can you say what is
going on with the insurance policy and if instalments can be made and by how
much as ATM there is no way after paying for a funeral that 2 payments of
£700 can be made. Can you also send him over his no claims bonus? Regards Lorraine 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 388. Lorraine Cordell _RE_
Simon Cordell_ (11) /
Page Numbers: 1148,1149,1150,1151, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 October 2014 13:15 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi
Martin Ø Thank you for the reply yes
can I make the payment of £328.45 today please. Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To:martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 22
October 2014 12:10 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Lorraine, Looking at the agreement the Direct debit the payment schedule looks
like the below, we need to make sure the payment goes through as failure will
result in the Facility being withdrawn. Alternatively, I can process the
payment by card to ensure it goes through prior Friday 31Oct2014 Direct Debit Unblocked £328.45 Wednesday 19Nov2014 Direct Debit Unblocked £149.21 Friday 19Dec2014 Direct Debit Unblocked £149.21 Monday 19Jan2015 Direct Debit Unblocked £149.21 Thursday 19Feb2015 Direct Debit Unblocked £149.21 Thursday 19Mar2015 Direct Debit Unblocked £149.21 Monday 20Apr2015 Direct Debit Unblocked £149.21 Tuesday 19May2015 Direct Debit Unblocked £149.21 Friday 19Jun2015 Direct Debit Unblocked £149.21 Monday 20Jul2015 Direct Debit Unblocked £149.21 Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 cid: image001.png@01CC9FAC.C5567270 t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843
594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This e‐mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended
solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e‐mail in error, please reply to the
sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we are
able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e‐mail communications
passing through our network. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Is Authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. 1149,1150,1151, 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 389. Martin Jenkin _RE_ Simon Cordell_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1152,1153,1154,1155,1156, From: Martin Jenkin [martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 22
October 2014 18:19 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Sorry Lorraine Ø Haven’t stopped today,
I need card details to process payment Number, sec code, ex-date etc Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 cid: image001.png@01CC9FAC.C5567270 t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct ‐ Telephone number: 01843 594477 ‐
Fax Number: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This e‐mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended
solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e‐mail in error, please reply to the
sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we are
able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e‐mail communications
passing through our network. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22
October 2014 13:15 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Ø Thank you for the reply yes can I make the payment of £328.45 today
please. Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 22 October 2014 12:10 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Lorraine, Looking at the agreement the Direct debit the payment schedule looks
like the below, we need to make sure the payment goes through as failure will
result in the Facility being withdrawn. Alternatively, I can process the
payment by card to ensure it goes through prior Friday 31Oct2014 Direct Debit Unblocked £328.45 1153,1154,1155,1156, |
||||
|
|
|
23/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/10/2014 |
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 390. Martin Jenkin _RE_
Simon Cordell_ (4) / Page Numbers: 1159,1160,1161,1162,1163 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
28/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 390. Martin Jenkin _RE_ Simon
Cordell_ (4) /
Page Numbers: 1159,1160,1161,1162,1163, From:
Martin
Jenkin [martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent:
28
October 2014 17:56 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Lorraine, Ø
The
payment is already in cycle so please ensure the money is there to be taken
as cleared funds by the 30th latest Regards Martin Jenkin DDI
01843 598744 t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct -
Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax Number: 01843 594488. This e-mail
transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the person or
organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and
confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must
not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible
and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the
right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our network.
Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 October 2014 13:15 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Martin Thank you for the reply
yes can I make the payment of £328.45 today please. Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To: martinienkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 22 October 2014 12:10 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi Lorraine, Looking at the agreement the Direct debit the
payment schedule looks like the below, we need to make sure the payment goes
through as failure will result in the Facility being withdrawn.
Alternatively, I can process the payment by card to ensure it goes through
prior 1160,1161,1162,1163, |
||||
|
|
3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 391. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (10) / Page
Numbers: 1164,1165,1166,1167,1168 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
29/10/2014 |
|
|
|
3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 391. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (10) /
Page Numbers: 1164,1165,1166,1167,1168, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 29 October 2014 16:35 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Hi
Martin Ø The money is in the bank all
ready Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To:martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 28 October 2014 17:56 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Lorraine, Ø The payment is already
in cycle so please ensure the money is there to be taken as cleared funds by
the 30th latest Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct ‐ Telephone number: 01843 594477 ‐
Fax Number: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This e‐mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended
solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e‐mail in error, please reply to the
sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we are
able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e‐mail communications
passing through our network. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 October 2014 13:15 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Martin Ø Thank you for the reply yes can I make the payment of £328.45 today
please. Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin Mail To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 22 October 2014 12:10 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Hi Lorraine, 1165,1166,1167,1168, |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
30/10/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/10/2014 |
|
|
Simulation November 2014 (Click here
to go back to the Index)
|
November
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
01/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
02/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
03/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
04/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
05/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
06/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
07/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
08/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
09/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
10/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
11/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
12/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
13/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
14/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
15/11/2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
16/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
17/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
18/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
19/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
36. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 36
Anita.Ayi@financial-ombudsman.org.uk_11.20.2014_Mr
S Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting Ag 20/11/2014 / Page Numbers: 262,263,264 265,266,267 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 392. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ REF_ 00-COSX14MT07-ID_80_ Open Attach Documents_
(1) / Page
Numbers: 1171,1172 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 393. Ayi Anita Mr. S Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting
Agencies Limited (Our
ref_ 16352175) / Page
Numbers: 1173,1174 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 394. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Mr. S Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our
ref_ 1 / Page
Numbers: 1175,1176 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
20/11/2014 |
17:30:00 |
X6 262,263,264 265,266,267 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
36. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 36 Anita.Ayi@financial-ombudsman.org.uk_11.20.2014_Mr
S Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting Ag 20/11/2014 / Page Numbers: 262,263,264 265,266,267 -- 262, From: Ayi, Anita Anita.Ayi@fmandal-ombudsman.org.uk Sent: 20 November 2014
17:30 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Mr S Cordell's
complaint about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our ref: 16352175) Attachments: Cordell CF.rtf Dear Ms Cordell Ø Mr S Cordell's
complaint about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited Ø Thank you for
getting in touch with us. Our consumer leaflet explains our role - so do read
through and have a look at how we can help: www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/consumer-leaflet.htm Ø As you can see,
before we can take on a complaint, the business involved must have the chance
to put things right. what happens next Ø I've written to the
business to let them know about the complaint. Ø They should contact
you soon to tell you they are looking into what's happened - and to ask for
more details if they need them. Ø If you don't
hear from the business within the next few days, you can contact them using
the details below - mentioning that we have already written to them. Ø They should give
you their final response to the complaint - in writing -
within eight weeks of the date they first received it. Ø The business's
final response should summarise the complaint and give you their final say.
It should also tell you that you can refer the complaint to us if you're not
happy - which you have to do within six months. Ø In case you need
it, the business's address is: KGM Underwriting
Agencies Limited KGM House George Lane London E18 1RX 263, once you have a
final response - or after eight weeks Ø If you're not happy
with the business's final response - or if eight weeks pass and you haven't
received it - then please fill in the enclosed complaint form and send it to
us. Ø Please also send us
a copy of the final response and any other information you think is important
to the complaint. Ø There's no need to
send us any original documents. Ø We don't normally
pay the professional fees - in full or in part - of any solicitor,
accountant, or other paid adviser that a consumer might use to bring a
complaint to us. Ø We won't take any
more action unless you contact us again. Ø If you would like
more information about us, please see our website - www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk. Yours sincerely
Anita Ayi Consumer Consultant Anita Ayi | Consumer
Consultant | Tel: 020 3716 9790 | Fax: 020 3716 9791
|Financial Ombudsman Service | Exchange Tower,
London, E14 9SR This email is
covered by our email disclaimer. This email was sent
from Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. Registered in
England and Wales. Registered Number:
3725015. Registered Office: Exchange Tower, London, E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. 264,
End of Picture! 265,
End of Picture! 266,
End of Picture! 267,
End of Picture! 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 392. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
REF_ 00-COSX14MT07-ID_80_ Open Attach Documents_ (1) /
Page Numbers: 1171,1172, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 20 November 2014 16:48
To: 'rachelbarker@broadsuredirect.com' Cc: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: RE: REF:
00-COSX14MT07-ID<80> Open Attach Documents Dear Rachel and Martin Ø
I am writing this
email as I said on the phone the other day to you there is big problems with
Simon Licence due to KGM I do not have counterpart issue 21 Simon lost it
ages ago. Ø
Due to KGM and all
the times Simon vehicles was sized due to then showing as not insured Simon
cannot even drive as his licence has been revoked for no insurance. Ø
Which as you are
aware, he was in fact insured. Ø
As I said, no
summons came for 2 of the seizer so we did not know about them going to court
and they found him guilty of no insurance when in fact he was insured the
reason we found out was DVLA wrote to us asking for Simon Licence to be sent
to them to add the points, these 2 cases I am asking the court to set them
aside, and reopen the cases in the email to the court I have sent a copy of
Simon insurance. Ø
But the 2 courts are
taking their time about it to do anything or set a new date. Ø
We got one summons
out of the 3 cases that I am trying to deal with and sent that off saying not
guilty I done this by email also and sent a copy of insurance but this is the
case where the police officer spoke to KGM and Martin to which both said he
was in fact insured then the police officer said Simon had tools in his van
which he did not and KGM was going to void his insurance due to this Martin
is well aware of this one and so is Kelly Tiller at KGM I have asked both KGM
doe data about this and also Martin to write an email about this but none has
done this as I have had not repose to what I asked. Ø
There is also the
fact no letter come from the court with a date this was going to be heard,
this case is listed to be heard at court on the 26/11/2014 Ø
Therefore, as you
can see due to KGM and Simon insurance not showing on the MID database this
has had a huge impact on Simon if I could apply for a new Licence I would but
due to it being revoked I cannot get this. Ø
Therefore, the
counterpart you need cannot be dealt with until all of this goes to court and
is sorted, and this is no fault of Simon’s.
Ø
Simon licence at
this time due to the no insurance will have points on it due to the no
insurance this is a mess due to what KGM done with Simon insurance, I have
kept asking for things to send the court but have had nothing, so ATM Simon
has insurance and cannot even drive. Ø
Which in itself is
totally wrong. Ø
I am also at this
time writing a letter to the insurance ombudsman as it has gone too far Simon
losing his licence when in fact he did have insurance and it did not matter
how many times we called Martin and KGM the MID database was not corrected,
until the compound noticed what was wrong and then we forwarded this
information over to Martin and KGM, at this point KGM did in fact sort his
car out on the database but not his van this did not happen for some months
after due to us keeping on about it to KGM. Ø
And it was all due
to a space being placed in the database within the reg of the vehicles. Ø
Simon ATN is out of
packet by a lot of money due to the sizers and also due to paying for
insurance that he cannot even use now due to this mess which is not right. Ø
I do not know how
this is going to be dealt with as I cannot send you the document you are
asking for Broadsure knows my son has a licence as Simon has been using
Broadsure for the past 3 or 4 years can you please get back to me about this
matter as you said you would talk to Martin after our last call and I have
heard nothing. Regards Lorraine From:
Rewired
[Mail To: re_wired@ymail.com] Sent:
20
November 2014 13:59 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
Fwd.: REF:
00-COSX14MT07-ID<80> Open
Attach Documents On Tuesday, 18 November
2014, 15:43, Rachel <rachelbarker@broadsuredirect.com> wrote 1172, Good Afternoon, Ø
Please contact
Broadsure Direct on 01843 594477 regarding outstanding Counter Part Driving
Licence (issue 21), Ø
This matter is now
urgent, and we need these documents to avoid your insurance company sending a
7-day cancellation notice. Kind Regards Rachel Barker cid:
image001.png@01 Administration Department t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure
Direct Telephone
number: 01843
594477 Fax Number:
01843
594488. This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as
soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and
reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our
network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial
Conduct Authority. 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 393. Ayi, Anita_ Mr S Cordell's complaint
about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our ref_ 16352175) /
Page Numbers: 1173,1174, From: Ayi, Anita Anita.Ayi@financialombudsman.org.uk Sent: 20 November 2014 17:30 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Mr S Cordell's complaint
about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our ref: 16352175) Attachments:
Cordell
CF.rtf Dear Ms Cordell Ø
Mr S Cordell’s
complaint about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited Ø
Thank you for
getting in touch with us. Ø
Our consumer leaflet
explains our role – so do read through and have Ø
a look at how we can
help: Ø www.financial‐ombudsman.org.uk/publications/consumer‐leaflet.htm Ø
As you can see,
before we can take on a complaint, the business involved must have the chance
to put things Ø
right. Ø
what happens next,
I’ve written to the business to let them know about the complaint. Ø
They should contact
you soon to tell you they are looking into what’s happened Ø
and to ask for more details if they need
them. Ø
If you don’t hear
from the business within the next few days, you can contact them using the
details below – Ø
mentioning that we
have already written to them. Ø
They should give you
their final response to the complaint in writing Ø
within eight weeks
of the date, they first received it. Ø
The business’s final
response should summarise the complaint and give you their final say. Ø
It should also tell
you that you can refer the complaint to us if you’re not happy Ø
which you have to do
within six months. In case you need it, the business’s address is: KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited KGM House George Lane London E18 1RX Ø
once you have a
final response – or after eight weeks Ø
If you’re not happy
with the business’s final response Ø
or if eight weeks
pass and you haven’t received it Ø
then please fill in
the enclosed complaint form and send it to us. Ø
Please also send us
a copy of the final response and any other information you think is important
to the complaint. Ø
There’s no need to
send us any original documents. Ø
We don’t normally
pay the professional fees – in full or in part – of any solicitor, accountant
or other paid adviser that a consumer might use to bring a complaint to us.
We won’t take any more action unless you contact us again. Ø
If you would like
more information about us, Ø
please see our
website – Ø www.financial‐ombudsman.org.uk. Yours
sincerely 1174, Anita
Ayi Consumer
Consultant Anita
Ayi | Consumer Consultant Tel: 020 3716 9790 Fax: 020 3716 9791|Financial
Ombudsman Service | Exchange Tower, London, E14
9SR This email is covered by our
email disclaimer. This email was sent from Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. Registered in England and Wales. Registered Number:
3725015. Registered Office: Exchange Tower, London, E14 9SR, United Kingdom. 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 394. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Mr
S Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our ref_ 1 /
Page Numbers: 1175,1176, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 20 November 2014 20:09 To: 'Ayi, Anita' Subject: RE: Mr S Cordell's complaint
about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our ref: 16352175) Hello Ø
Thank you for the
email to the complaint but I cannot see the attached form which my son would
need to look over and write anything else that has not been written and sign
and send back. Ø
Could you please
attach the form so that this can be done? Regards Lorraine From: Ayi, Anita [Mail To: Anita.Ayi@financialombudsman.org.uk] Sent: 20 November 2014 17:30 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Mr S Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our ref: 16352175) Dear Ms Cordell Ø Mr S Cordell’s
complaint about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited Ø Thank you for getting
in touch with us. Ø Our consumer leaflet
explains our role – so do read through and have Ø a look at how we can
help: Ø www.financial‐ombudsman.org.uk/publications/consumer‐leaflet.htm Ø As you can see, before
we can take on a complaint, the business involved must have the chance to put
things Ø right. Ø what happens next, I’ve
written to the business to let them know about the complaint. Ø They should contact you
soon to tell you they are looking into what’s happened Ø and to ask for more details if they need
them. Ø If you don’t hear from
the business within the next few days, you can contact them using the details
below – Ø mentioning that we have
already written to them. Ø They should give you
their final response to the complaint in writing Ø within eight weeks of
the date, they first received it. Ø The business’s final
response should summarise the complaint and give you their final say. Ø It should also tell you
that you can refer the complaint to us if you’re not happy Ø which you have to do
within six months. In case you need it, the business’s address is: KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited KGM House George Lane London E18 1RX Ø once you have a final
response – or after eight weeks Ø If you’re not happy
with the business’s final response Ø or if eight weeks pass
and you haven’t received it Ø then please fill in the
enclosed complaint form and send it to us. Ø Please also send us a
copy of the final response and any other information you think is important
to the complaint. Ø There’s no need to send
us any original documents. Ø We don’t normally pay
the professional fees – in full or in part – of any solicitor, accountant or
other paid adviser that a consumer might use to bring a complaint to us. We
won’t take any more action unless you contact us again. Ø If you would like more
information about us, Ø please see our website
– Ø www.financial‐ombudsman.org.uk. Yours sincerely 1176, Anita Ayi Consumer Consultant Anita Ayi | Consumer Consultant Tel: 020 3716 9790 Fax: 020 3716 9791|Financial Ombudsman Service | Exchange Tower, London, E14 9SR This email is covered by our email disclaimer. This email was sent from Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. Registered
in England and Wales. Registered Number: 3725015. Registered Office: Exchange
Tower, London, E14 9SR, United Kingdom. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
37. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 37 Anita.Ayi@financial-ombudsman.org.uk_11.21.2014_RE
Mr S Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting 21/11/2014 / Page Numbers: 268,269,270 271,272,273,274 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 395. Ayi, Anita RE_ Mr. S
Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our
ref_ 1635217 / Page
Numbers: 1177,1178 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 396. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (9) / Page
Numbers: 1179 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 397. GL-BROMLEYMCENQ_RE_
Simon Cordell / Page
Numbers: 1180,1181 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ |
21/11/2014 |
11:30:00 |
X7 268,269,270 271,272,273,274 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
38. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 38 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_11.21.2014_RE Simon Cordell 21/11/2014 / Page Numbers: 275,276 |
21/11/2014 |
14:12:00 |
X2 275,276 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
37. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 37 Anita.Ayi@financial-ombudsman.org.uk_11.21.2014_RE
Mr S Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting 21/11/2014 / Page Numbers: 268,269,270 271,272,273,274 -- 268, From: Ayi, Anita Anita.Ayi@fmandal-ombudsman.org.uk Sent: 21 November 2014
11:30 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Mr S Cordell's
complaint about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our ref: 16352175) Attachments: Cordell CF.rtf Dear Lorraine Ø
Many thanks for your
email. Ø
I have reattached the
complaint form to the email for your perusal. Ø
If you have any
further question, please do not hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Anita Ayi Consumer Consultant Anita Ayi | Consumer
Consultant | Tel: 020 3716 9790 | Fax: 020 3716 9791 | Financial Ombudsman Service |
Exchange Tower, London, E14 9SR From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 20 November 2014 20:09 To: Ayi, Anita Subject: RE: Mr S Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our
ref: 16352175) Hello Ø Thank you for the email
to the complaint but I cannot see the attached form which my son would need
to look over and write anything else that has not been written and sign and
send back. Ø Could you please attach
the form so that this can be done? Regards Lorraine From: Ayi, Anita mailto: Anita.Ayi@financial-ombudsman.org.uk Sent: 20
November 2014 17:30 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Mr S Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our
ref: 16352175) Dear Ms Cordell Mr S Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting
Agencies Limited Thank you for getting in touch with us. Our
consumer leaflet explains our role - so do read through and have a look at
how we can help: www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/consumer-leaflet.htm As you can see, before we can take on a
complaint, the business involved must have the chance to put things right. what happens next I've written to the business to let them know
about the complaint. They should contact you soon to tell you they are
looking into what's happened - and to ask for more details if they need them. 269, If you don't hear from the
business within the next few days, you can contact them using the details
below - mentioning that we have already written to them. They
should give you their final response to the complaint -
in writing - within eight weeks of the date they first received it. The business's final response should summarise
the complaint and give you their final say. It should also tell you that you can refer the
complaint to us if you're not happy - which you have to do within six
months. In case you need it, the business's address is: KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited KGM House George Lane London E18 1RX 270, once you have a final response - or after eight
weeks If you're not happy with the business's final
response - or if eight weeks pass and you haven't received it - then please
fill in the enclosed complaint form and send it to us. Please also send us a copy of the final response
and any other information you think is important to the complaint. There's no
need to send us any original documents. We don't normally pay the professional fees - in
full or in part - of any solicitor, accountant, or other paid adviser that a
consumer might use to bring a complaint to us. We won't take any more action unless you contact
us again. If you would like more information about us, please see our website
- www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk. Yours sincerely Anita Ayi Consumer Consultant Anita Ayi | Consumer Consultant | Tel: 020 3716 9790 | Fax: 020 3716 9791 | Financial Ombudsman Service | Exchange Tower,
London, E14 9SR This email is covered by our email disclaimer. This email was sent from Financial Ombudsman
Service Ltd. Registered in England and Wales. Registered Number: 3725015.
Registered Office: Exchange
Tower, London, E14 9SR, United Kingdom. This email is covered by our email disclaimer. This email was sent from Financial Ombudsman
Service Ltd. Registered in England and Wales. Registered Number: 3725015.
Registered Office: Exchange
Tower, London, E14 9SR, United Kingdom. 271, Financial Ombudsman Service / complaint form! 272, Financial Ombudsman Service / complaint form! 273, Financial Ombudsman Service / complaint form! 274, Financial Ombudsman Service / complaint form! 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 395. Ayi, Anita RE_ Mr S
Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our ref_ 1635217 / Page Numbers: 1177,1178, 1179, From: Ayi, Anita Anita.Ayi@financialombudsman.org.uk Sent: 21 November 2014 11:30 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Mr S Cordell's complaint
about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our ref:16352175) Attachments:
Cordell
CF.rtf Dear Lorraine Ø
Many thanks for your
email. Ø
I have reattached
the complaint form to the email for your perusal. Ø
If you have any
further question, please do not hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Anita Ayi Consumer
Consultant Anita
Ayi | Consumer Consultant Tel: 020 3716 9790 Fax: 020 3716 9791|Financial
Ombudsman Service | Exchange
Tower, London, E14 9SR From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 20 November 2014 20:09 To: Ayi, Anita Subject: RE: Mr S Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our
ref: 16352175) Hello Ø Thank you for the email
to the complaint but I cannot see the attached form which my son would need
to look over and write anything else that has not been written and sign and
send back. Ø Could you please attach
the form so that this can be done? Regards Lorraine From: Ayi, Anita Mail To: Anita.Ayi@financialombudsman.org.uk Sent: 20 November 2014 17:30 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Mr S Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited (Our
ref: 16352175) Dear Ms Cordell Mr S Cordell's complaint about KGM Underwriting
Agencies Limited Thank you for getting in touch with us. Our
consumer leaflet explains our role - so do read through and have a look at
how we can help: www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/consumer-leaflet.htm As you can see, before we can take on a
complaint, the business involved must have the chance to put things right. 1178, I’ve written to the business to let them know about the complaint.
They should contact you soon to tell you they are looking into what’s
happened – and to ask for more details if they need them. If you don’t hear
from the business within the next few days, you can contact them using the
details below – mentioning that we have already written to them. They should
give you their final response to the complaint – in writing – within eight
weeks of the date they first received it. The business’s final response
should summarise the complaint and give you their final say. It should also
tell you that you can refer the complaint to us if you’re not happy – which
you have to do within six months. In case you need it, the business’s address
is: KGM Underwriting Agencies Limited KGM House George Lane London E18 1RX once you have a final response – or after eight weeks If you’re not
happy with the business’s final response – or if eight weeks pass and you
haven’t received it – then please fill in the enclosed complaint form and
send it to us. Please also send us a copy of the final response and any other
information you think is important to the complaint. There’s no need to send
us any original documents. We don’t normally pay the professional fees – in
full or in part – of any solicitor, accountant or other paid adviser that a
consumer might use to bring a complaint to us. We won’t take any more action
unless you contact us again. If you would like more information about us,
please see our website – www.financial‐ombudsman.org.uk. Yours sincerely Anita Ayi Consumer Consultant Anita Ayi | Consumer Consultant Tel: 020 3716 9790 Fax: 020 3716 9791|Financial Ombudsman Service | Exchange Tower, London, E14 9SR This email is covered by our email disclaimer. This email was sent from Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. Registered
in England and Wales. Registered Number: 3725015. Registered Office: Exchange
Tower, London, E14 9SR, United Kingdom. This email is covered by our email
disclaimer. 1179, This email was sent from Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. Registered
in England and Wales. Registered Number: 3725015. Registered Office: Exchange
Tower, London, E14 9SR, United Kingdom. 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 396. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (9) /
Page Numbers: 1179, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 November 2014 14:12 To: 'glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Attachments: 011402647845CourtCase.pdf To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am writing this
email due to a letter from the court that my son Simon Cordell DOB 26/01/2014
had a case on the 06/11/2014 in Bromley Magistrates Court Ø
It says on the
letter it was for a case of no insurance the case number is 011402647845. Ø
The problem is we
did not know he was due to come to court on this date we have had no summons
and my son is insured he always has insurance and would not drive without it.
Ø
There has been a
number of issues with his insurance and this is due to it not showing up on
the MID database. Ø
There has been a
number of Seizers to his vehicles for no insurance when he was in fact
insured. Ø
Could you please
send me details of what date this offence of no insurance happened? Ø
This way I can send
the correct insurance policy by email. and can work forward to clearing this
matter up. Regards Lorraine Cordell 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 397. GL-BROMLEYMCENQ_RE_
Simon Cordell /
Page Numbers: 1180,1181, From: GLBROMLEYMCENQ [glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 21 November 2014 14:13 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell This is an automatically
generated message acknowledging your recent E Mail to the Customer Service
Team. Please note a full reply will only be sent if appropriate. Please DO
NOT re‐submit your enquiry by E Mail, fax or letter as duplicates
create unnecessary paperwork and delays. CONTACT DETAILS FOR BROMLEY
ADMINISTRATION CENTRE (for Bromley, Bexley and Greenwich Magistrates Courts) as
follows: Telephone: 020 8437 3500 or 020 8437
3585 Gold fax: 0870 324 0223 E
Mail: GL‐BromleyMCSummons@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for ongoing summons case
enquiries) GL‐BromleyMCEnq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for all concluded case
enquiries) GL‐BromleyMCList@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for ongoing charge case
& Legal Aid enquiries) SEGroupResultingEnquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for Court result enquiries) Other
useful E Mail contacts: GL‐CAO.CORRESPOND@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for all fines enquiries) Enquiries@bromley.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk (for Civil Proceeding
enquiries) Thank you, Customer Service Team This
email (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform
the sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by email. This email (whether you are the sender or the recipient)
may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Email
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content may be read at
any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The original of this email
was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning 1181, service supplied by Vodafone
in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This
email has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 38. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 38 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_11.21.2014_RE Simon Cordell 21/11/2014 / Page Numbers: 275,276 -- 275, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 21 November 2014 14:12 To: gl-bromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Attachments: 011402647845-Court-Case.pdf To Whom It May Concern: Ø I am writing this email
due to a letter from the court that my son Simon Cordell DOB 26/01/2014
had a case on the 06/11/2014 in Bromley Magistrates
Court Ø It says on the letter
it was for a case of no insurance the case number is 011402647845. Ø The problem is we did
not know he was due to come to court on this date we have had no summons and
my son is insured he always has insurance and would not drive without it. Ø There has been a number
of issues with his insurance and this is due to it not showing up on the MID
database. Ø There has been a number
of Seizers to his vehicles for no insurance when he was in fact insured. Ø Could you please send
me details of what date this offence of no insurance happened? Ø This way I can send the
correct insurance policy by email. and can work forward to clearing this
matter up. Lorraine Cordell 276, RE: - Simon
Cordell->011402647845-Court-Case.pdf Bromley Magistrates'
Court Code 2575 London Collection
and Compliance Centre PO Box 31090 London SW1P 3WQ Payments 0300 790 9901 www.direct.gov.uk/payacourtfine Information 020
7556 8500 AP 31712 Mr Simon Paul
CORDELL 109 Burnt Croft
Avenue Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ Division: 077 Account number: 14115223S
CG Case number: 011402647845 Born: 26 January
1981 Notice of fine
and collection order Offences and
penalties
The court has
made a Collection Order to collect the sum due. See reverse for
details on how to pay. Failure to pay as ordered will make you liable for further enforcement
action unless you pay the full balance
immediately. This could include: ® Deductions from
your earnings
If you have
difficulties in paying the amount you must immediately contact the
Enforcement Team on the number above. All enquiries
regarding this notice should be made to the above address. Date: 6 November 2014 K. T. Griffiths Justices' Clerk Mr Simon Paul
CORDELL 7 November
2014/FINO 36 0/2415061/1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
22/11/2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
23/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
24/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
25/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Willesden The Willesden one seems to have been reheard
at court on the
26/01/2015 without
us knowing again he was found
guilty, but they put this case under a new case number looking at the letter so all
the documents that were sent before was not with the court file I would have
through. Appeal against conviction at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court The dates of conviction were
the 26/11/2014
Wimbledon
magistrate’s court. Appeal date is 05/03/2015 at 10:00 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court GLBRENTMCENQ 011403134612 North West and West London
Magistrates' Courts Administration Centre Sharon. Burns - Met Police 1 Ø The Brixton Cases! Brixton
Case / Met Police! Broadsure
Insurance! 2 Ø My 1st Asbo
Response Bundle/ pub Book Issue: 1! FOLLOWING SIMON CORDELL SUMMONS
FOR NO INSURANCE COURT CLERK'S HANDWRITTEN
NOTES RESULTING IN CONVICTION FOR NO INSURANCE/ Page Numbers: 210,211,212,213 The Brixton case The Night
Club Job I Lost because of the Police! |
26/11/2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 The
Brixton case: -- Ø The 26/11/2014 Ø
On the date above I
had a court case at Wimbledon magistrate’s court in the Brixton area. Ø
I had wrongfully got
accused of using my vehicle without an insurance policy in place. Ø
The main allegation
was based as “for other business reasons than the policy got taken out by me
for.” Ø
I got found guilty
and attended home in anger with a driving ban and points inclusive of a fine. Ø
The case latter got
overturned in my favour. 2 My
1st Asbo Response Bundle/ pub Book Issue: 1! FOLLOWING SIMON CORDELL
SUMMONS FOR NO INSURANCE COURT CLERK'S HANDWRITTEN
NOTES RESULTING IN CONVICTION FOR NO INSURANCE/ Page
Numbers: 210,211,212,213 Ø The Brixton case The Night Club Job I Lost because of the Police! 210, “Hand
Wrote Notes” 211, “Hand
Wrote Notes” 212, “Hand
Wrote Notes” 213 “Hand
Wrote Notes” |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
39. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 39 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_11.27.2014_FW Simon Cordell 27/11/2014 / Page Numbers: 277,278,279 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 399. Leslie, Sandra RE_
Simon Cordell / Page
Numbers: 1183,1184 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 400. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (8) / Page
Numbers: 1185,1186 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 401. GL-BROMLEYMCENQ_RE_
Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page
Numbers: 1187,1188 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 402. Lorraine Cordell
_Fwd._ Simon Cordell / Page
Numbers: 1189,1190 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 403. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell Section 9 statement for court / Page Numbers: 1191 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
27/11/2014 |
12:49:00 |
X3 277,278,279 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
39. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 39 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_11.27.2014_FW Simon Cordell 27/11/2014 / Page Numbers: 277,278,279 -- 277, From: Lorraine Cordell
<lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 27 November 2014
12:49 To: 'sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: FW: Simon Cordell Attachments: si-insurance-19-05-2014.pdf Dear Miss S E
Leslie Ø Thank you for the reply to my
email, Ø I did in fact speak to
someone at the court yesterday Mr Mark Dredge as I explained my son was due
in court yesterday on a next matter of no insurance when he was insured. Ø After speaking to that court,
they told me to ask the CPS dealing with that case to deal with the other 2
matters of no insurance which my son never got a summons for. Ø Mark Dredge told me the case
at Bromley was in fact a date of 20/05/2014 so I attended court with my
son yesterday with my son’s insurance papers for that date. Ø I did ask the CPS yesterday
to deal with these other 2 matters, but she said she could not, and I would
have to contract the court which I had told her I had already done. Ø Please see attached file of
my son’s insurance. Ø You can contact me on 07961. Regards Miss Lorraine
Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra [mailto:sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] On Behalf Of GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 27 November 2014
12:01 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Morning Miss Cordell Ø Thank you for your email, please
could you email me your mobile number to discuss this matter further. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 November 2014 14:12 To: GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell To Whom It May Concern: Ø I am writing this email
due to a letter from the court that my son Simon Cordell DOB 26/01/2014
had a case on the 06/11/2014 in Bromley Magistrates
Court Ø It says on the letter
it was for a case of no insurance the case number is 011402647845. Ø The problem is we did
not know he was due to come to court on this date we have had no summons and
my son is insured he always has insurance and would not drive without it. Ø There has been a number
of issues with his insurance and this is due to it not showing up on the MID
database. Ø There has been a number
of Seizers to his vehicles for no insurance when he was in fact insured. Ø Could you please send
me details of what date this offence of no insurance happened? Ø This way I can send the
correct insurance policy by email. and can work forward to clearing this
matter up. 278, Regards Lorraine Cordell This email was scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please
call your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of Justice.
E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken
when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. 279,
End of Picture!
End of Picture! 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 399. Leslie, Sandra RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1183,1184, From: Leslie, Sandra [sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] on behalf of GLBROMLEYMCENQ [glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 27 November 2014 12:01 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Morning Miss Cordell Ø Thank you for your email, please could you email me your mobile number
to discuss this matter further. further. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 November 2014 14:12 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell To Whom It May Concern: Ø I am writing this email
due to a letter from the court that my son Simon Cordell DOB 26/01/2014
had a case on the 06/11/2014 in Bromley Magistrates
Court Ø It says on the letter
it was for a case of no insurance the case number is 011402647845. Ø The problem is we did
not know he was due to come to court on this date we have had no summons and
my son is insured he always has insurance and would not drive without it. Ø There has been a number
of issues with his insurance and this is due to it not showing up on the MID
database. Ø There has been a number
of Seizers to his vehicles for no insurance when he was in fact insured. Ø Could you please send
me details of what date this offence of no insurance happened? Ø This way I can send the
correct insurance policy by email. and can work forward to clearing this
matter up. Regards Lorraine Cordell This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet antivirus
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisations IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email (and any attachment) is
intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email.
Internet email is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding
whether to send material in response to this message by email. This email
(whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and
retained by the Ministry of Justice. Email 1184, monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken
when composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 400. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (8) / Page Numbers: 1185,1186, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 November 2014 12:44 To: 'GL-BROMLEYMCENQ' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Attachments: si-insurance-19-05-2014.
pdf Dear Miss S E Leslie Ø Thank you for the reply to my email, Ø I did in fact speak to someone at the court yesterday Mr Mark Dredge
as I explained my son was due in court yesterday on a next matter of no
insurance when he was insured. After speaking to that court, they told me to
ask the CPS dealing with that case to deal with the other 2 matters of no
insurance which my son never got a summons for. Ø Mark Dredge told me the case at Bromley was in fact a date of 20/05/2014
so I attended court with my son yesterday with my son’s insurance papers for
that date. Ø I did ask the CPS yesterday to deal with these other 2 matters, but
she said she could not, and I would have to contract the court which I had
told her I had already done. Ø Please see attached file of my son’s insurance. Ø You can contact me on 07961. Regards Miss Lorraine Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra Mail To: sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk On Behalf Of GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 27 November 2014 12:01 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Morning Miss Cordell Ø Thank you for your email, please could you email me your mobile number
to discuss this matter further. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 November 2014 14:12 To: GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell To Whom It May Concern: Ø I am writing this email
due to a letter from the court that my son Simon Cordell DOB 26/01/2014
had a case on the 06/11/2014 in Bromley Magistrates
Court Ø It says on the letter
it was for a case of no insurance the case number is 011402647845. Ø The problem is we did
not know he was due to come to court on this date we have had no summons and
my son is insured he always has insurance and would not drive without it. Ø There has been a number
of issues with his insurance and this is due to it not showing up on the MID
database. Ø There has been a number
of Seizers to his vehicles for no insurance when he was in fact insured. Ø Could you please send
me details of what date this offence of no insurance happened? Ø This way I can send the
correct insurance policy by email. and can work forward to clearing this
matter up. 1186, Regards Lorraine Cordell This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisations IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is
intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding
whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail
(whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and
retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software
may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a
responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding
e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 401. GL-BROMLEYMCENQ_RE_
Simon Cordell_ (1) /
Page Numbers: 1187,1188, From:
GL-BROMLEYMCENQ
[gl-bromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent:
27
November 2014 12:45 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Ø
This is an
automatically generated message acknowledging your recent E Mail to the
Customer Service Team. Ø
Please note a full
reply will only be sent if appropriate. Ø
Please DO NOT
re-submit your enquiry by E Mail, fax or letter as duplicates create
unnecessary paperwork and delays. Ø
CONTACT DETAILS FOR
BROMLEY ADMINISTRATION CENTRE (for Bromley, Bexley, and Greenwich Magistrates
Courts) as follows: Telephone:
020
8437 3500 or 020 8437 3585 Gold
fax: 0870
324 0223 E
Mail: GL-BromlevMCSummons@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for
ongoing summons case enquiries) GL-BromlevMCEnq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for
all concluded case enquiries) GL-BromleyMCList@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for
ongoing charge case & Legal Aid enquiries) SEGroupResultingEnquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for
Court result enquiries) Other
useful E Mail contacts: GL-CAO.CORRESPOND@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for
all fines enquiries) Enquiries@bromlev.countvcourt.gsi.gov.uk (for
Civil Proceeding enquiries) Thank you, Customer Service Team This e-mail (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you
are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the
sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to
this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that
in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by
e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at
any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning 1188, service supplied by Vodafone
in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This
email has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 402. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1189,1190, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 November 2014 12:49 To: 'sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: FW: Simon Cordell Attachments: si-insurance-19-05-2014.
Pdf Dear Miss S E Leslie Ø Thank you for the reply to my email, Ø I did in fact speak to someone at the court yesterday Mr Mark Dredge
as I explained my son was due in court yesterday on a next matter of no
insurance when he was insured. After speaking to that court, they told me to
ask the CPS dealing with that case to deal with the other 2 matters of no insurance
which my son never got a summons for. Ø Mark Dredge told me the case at Bromley was in fact a date of 20/05/2014
so I attended court with my son yesterday with my son’s insurance papers for
that date. Ø I did ask the CPS yesterday to deal with these other 2 matters, but
she said she could not, and I would have to contract the court which I had
told her I had already done. Ø Please see attached file of my son’s insurance. Ø You can contact me on 07961. Regards Miss Lorraine Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra Mail To: sandraleslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk On Behalf Of GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 27 November 2014 12:01 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Morning Miss Cordell Ø Thank you for your email, please could you email me your mobile number
to discuss this matter further. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 November 2014 14:12 To: GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell To Whom It May Concern: Ø I am writing this email
due to a letter from the court that my son Simon Cordell DOB 26/01/2014
had a case on the 06/11/2014 in Bromley Magistrates
Court Ø It says on the letter
it was for a case of no insurance the case number is 011402647845. Ø The problem is we did
not know he was due to come to court on this date we have had no summons and
my son is insured he always has insurance and would not drive without it. Ø There has been a number
of issues with his insurance and this is due to it not showing up on the MID
database. Ø There has been a number
of Seizers to his vehicles for no insurance when he was in fact insured. Ø Could you please send
me details of what date this offence of no insurance happened? Ø This way I can send the
correct insurance policy by email. and can work forward to clearing this
matter up. 1190, Regards Lorraine Cordell This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisations IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is
intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding
whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail
(whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and
retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software
may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a
responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding
e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 403. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell Section 9 statement for court /
Page Numbers: 1191, From:
Lorraine
Cordell Sent:
27
November 2014 16:40 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject:
RE: Simon
Cordell Section 9 statement for court Hi Martin Ø
Definition of an
‘admissible witness statement’ To be admissible (allowed) in court section 9
of the Criminal Justice Act (CJA) 1967 states for a witness statement to be
used as evidence in any criminal proceeding, other than committal
proceedings, it must: Ø Be a formal written document of a person Ø Be a set of facts relating to a certain event, or
events Ø Be signed by the person who makes it, to
confirm that the contents of the document are true, this is known as a
statement of truth, and have had a copy served on the other parties before
the trial. Ø If all of the above apply,
the witness does not always need to attend the trial to give oral evidence. Ø But once they have made a
written statement, they may be called on to attend court and give their
evidence in person. Ø The jury do not see witness
statements so the evidence contained in them will either be read out by
counsel or be given orally by the person who has given the statement. Ø When you can produce a
witness statement as evidence in court to be admissible in court, evidence
must be relevant to a fact which has to be proved, or disproved. Ø Every fact, and document
relied upon in court must be proved by admissible evidence. Ø You can produce a witness
statement as evidence in court when: Ø The relevant conditions in section 9 of the CJA
1967 are met: Ø This allows the defence to agree to a statement
being read at trial where it has been served in advance to them. For more information on the
act, see related link. Ø Section 116 or 117 of the CJA 2003 applies: Ø Please see the government
link: End |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
40. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 40 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_11.27.2014_RE Simon Cordell 27/11/2014 / Page Numbers: 280,281,282 |
27/11/2014 |
12:44:00 |
X3 280,281,282 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
40. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 40 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_11.27.2014_RE Simon Cordell 27/11/2014 / Page Numbers: 280,281,282 -- 280, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 27 November 2014
12:44 To: 'GL-BROMLEYMCENQ' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Attachments: si-insurance-19-05-2014.pdf Dear Miss S E
Leslie Ø Thank you for the reply to my
email, Ø I did in fact speak to
someone at the court yesterday Mr Mark Dredge as I explained my son was due
in court yesterday on a next matter of no insurance when he was insured.
After speaking to that court, they told me to ask the CPS dealing with that
case to deal with the other 2 matters of no insurance which my son never got
a summons for. Ø Mark Dredge told me the case
at Bromley was in fact a date of 20/05/2014 so I attended court with
my son yesterday with my son’s insurance papers for that date. Ø I did ask the CPS yesterday
to deal with these other 2 matters, but she said she could not, and I would
have to contract the court which I had told her I had already done. Ø Please see attached file of
my son’s insurance. Ø You can contact me on 07961. Regards Miss Lorraine
Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra [mailto:sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] On Behalf Of GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 27 November 2014 12:01 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Morning Miss Cordell Ø Thank you for your email, please could you email me your mobile number
to discuss this matter further. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 November 2014 14:12 To: GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell To Whom It May Concern: Ø I am writing this email
due to a letter from the court that my son Simon Cordell DOB 26/01/2014
had a case on the 06/11/2014 in Bromley Magistrates
Court Ø It says on the letter
it was for a case of no insurance the case number is 011402647845. Ø The problem is we did
not know he was due to come to court on this date we have had no summons and
my son is insured he always has insurance and would not drive without it. Ø There has been a number
of issues with his insurance and this is due to it not showing up on the MID
database. Ø There has been a number
of Seizers to his vehicles for no insurance when he was in fact insured. Ø Could you please send
me details of what date this offence of no insurance happened? Ø This way I can send the
correct insurance policy by email. and can work forward to clearing this
matter up. 281, Regards Lorraine Cordell This email was scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please
call your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. 282, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 404. Martin Jenkin _RE_ REF_
00-COSX14MT07-ID_80_ Open Attach Documents / Page
Numbers: 1192 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
28/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 404. Martin Jenkin _RE_ REF_ 00-COSX14MT07-ID_80_
Open Attach Documents /
Page Numbers: 1192, From: Martin Jenkin [martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 28 November 2014 14:36 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject:
RE: REF: 00COSX14MT07ID<80>
Open Attach Documents Lorraine, Ø
I have spoken to the
manager at KGM and he has advised Andy Austin is detailing with the case. Ø
They have asked for
a clear email for me to send to them of your requirements. Ø
Please could you
email what is required for me to forward on! (unfortunately, Kelly is on
annual leave at present) Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 cid:
image001.png@01CC9FAC.C5567270 t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure
Direct Telephone number: 01843 594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This e‐mail
transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the person or
organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and
confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must
not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this e‐mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as
possible and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve
the right to, monitor e‐mail communications passing through our
network. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Is
Authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
29/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
30/11/2014 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Simulation December 2014 (Click here
to go back to the Index)
|
December
2014 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
1 02/12/2014 Note 1: Driving license. I had to go to Highbury
Court! |
02/12/2014 |
|
|
|
1 Note
1: Driving license. Ø I had to go to Highbury
Court!
|
||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 406. Dredge, Mark _RE_
Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1202,1203,1204 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court – 011401009802
= GL-SWESTERNMCENQ |
03/12/2014 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 406. Dredge, Mark _RE_ Simon
Cordell / Page Numbers: 1202,1203,1204, From: Dredge, Mark [Mark.Dredge@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] on behalf of GLBROMLEYMCENQ [glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 03 December 2014 15:48 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Lorraine, Ø Thank you for your email as
it appears that your attempt to deal with the prosecution in one go was not a
success. Ø This will mean that your Son
will have to complete a Statutory Declaration at Bromley Magistrates Court. Ø I would suggest that you
either ring the court or email to confirm when your son heard about the case.
Often this easiest dealt with over the phone and we can book your son in a
Statutory Declaration in one of Bromley’s Traffic Courts. Kind Regards Mark Dredge Customer Services SE Group Bexley Bromley
Greenwich Magistrates' Courts 1 London Road Bromley BR1
1RA 0208
437 3500 Gold Fax 0870 324 0223 From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 November 2014 12:44 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Dear Miss S E Leslie Ø Thank you for the reply to my email, Ø I did in fact speak to someone at the court yesterday Mr Mark Dredge
as I explained my son was due in court yesterday on a next matter of no
insurance when he was insured. After speaking to that court, they told me to
ask the CPS dealing with that case to deal with the other 2 matters of no
insurance which my son never got a summons for. Ø Mark Dredge told me the case at Bromley was in fact a date of 20/05/2014
so I attended court with my son yesterday with my son’s insurance papers for
that date. Ø I did ask the CPS yesterday to deal with these other 2 matters, but
she said she could not, and I would have to contract the court which I had
told her I had already done. Ø Please see attached file of my son’s insurance. Ø You can contact me on 07961. Regards Miss Lorraine Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra [Mail To:sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] On Behalf Of GLBROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 27 November 2014 12:01 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Morning Miss Cordell Ø Thank you for your email, please could you email me your mobile number
to discuss this matter further. Regards Miss S E Leslie 1203, From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 November 2014 14:12 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell To Whom It May Concern: Ø I am writing this email
due to a letter from the court that my son Simon Cordell DOB 26/01/2014
had a case on the 06/11/2014 in Bromley Magistrates
Court Ø It says on the letter
it was for a case of no insurance the case number is 011402647845. Ø The problem is we did
not know he was due to come to court on this date we have had no summons and
my son is insured he always has insurance and would not drive without it. Ø There has been a number
of issues with his insurance and this is due to it not showing up on the MID
database. Ø There has been a number
of Seizers to his vehicles for no insurance when he was in fact insured. Ø Could you please send
me details of what date this offence of no insurance happened? Ø This way I can send the
correct insurance policy by email. and can work forward to clearing this
matter up. Regards Lorraine Cordell This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet antivirus
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisations IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email (and any attachment) is
intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email.
Internet email is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding
whether to send material in response to this message by email. This email
(whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and
retained by the Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may
be used, and email content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility
to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 1204, This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet antivirus
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisations IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email (and any attachment) is
intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email.
Internet email is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding
whether to send material in response to this message by email. This email
(whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and
retained by the Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may
be used, and email content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility
to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their
contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the
Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email
has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. |
||||
|
41. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 41 Mark.Dredge@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_12.04.2014_FW Simon Cordell 04/12/2014 / Page Numbers: 283,284,285,286 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 407. Dredge, Mark FW_
Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1206,1207,1208 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ |
04/12/2014 |
15:34:00 |
X4 283,284,285,286 |
|
|
41. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 41 12.04.2014_FW Simon Cordell 04/12/2014 / Page Numbers: 283,284,285,286 -- 283, From: Dredge, Mark <Mark.Dredge@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> on behalf of GL-BROMLEYMCENQ gl-bromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 04 December 2014 15:34 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: FW: Simon Cordell Attachments: si-insurance-19-05-2014.pdf Dear Miss Leslie, Ø Please be informed
that I the Statutory Declaration was granted and will be heard 18/12/2014 Kind Regards Mark Dredge Customer Services SE Group
Bexley-Bromley-Greenwich Magistrates' Courts 1 London Road Bromley BR11RA 0208 437 3500 Gold Fax 0870 324
0223 From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 27 November 2014 12:44 To: GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Miss S E Leslie Ø Thank you for the reply to my email, Ø I did in fact speak to someone at the court yesterday Mr Mark Dredge
as I explained my son was due in court yesterday on a next matter of no
insurance when he was insured. After speaking to that court, they told me to
ask the CPS dealing with that case to deal with the other 2 matters of no insurance
which my son never got a summons for. Ø Mark Dredge told me the case at Bromley was in fact a date of 20/05/2014
so I attended court with my son yesterday with my son’s insurance papers for
that date. Ø I did ask the CPS yesterday to deal with these other 2 matters, but
she said she could not, and I would have to contract the court which I had
told her I had already done. Ø Please see attached file of my son’s insurance. Ø You can contact me on 07961. Regards Miss Lorraine Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra mailto: sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk On Behalf Of GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 27 November 2014 12:01 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Morning Miss Cordell Ø Thank you for your email, please could you email me your mobile number
to discuss this matter further. Regards Miss S E Leslie 284, From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 November 2014 14:12 To: GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell To Whom It May Concern: Ø I am writing this email
due to a letter from the court that my son Simon Cordell DOB 26/01/2014
had a case on the 06/11/2014 in Bromley Magistrates
Court Ø It says on the letter
it was for a case of no insurance the case number is 011402647845. Ø The problem is we did
not know he was due to come to court on this date we have had no summons and
my son is insured he always has insurance and would not drive without it. Ø There has been a number
of issues with his insurance and this is due to it not showing up on the MID
database. Ø There has been a number
of Seizers to his vehicles for no insurance when he was in fact insured. Ø Could you please send
me details of what date this offence of no insurance happened? Ø This way I can send the
correct insurance policy by email. and can work forward to clearing this
matter up. Regards Lorraine Cordell This email was scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please
call your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. This email was scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please
call your organisations IT Helpdesk. 285, Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership
with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 286,
End of Picture! 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 407. Dredge, Mark FW_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1206,1207,1208, From: Dredge, Mark [Mark.Dredge@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] on behalf of GLBROMLEYMCENQ [glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 04 December 2014 15:34 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: FW: Simon
Cordell Attachments: siinsurance19052014.pdf Dear Miss Leslie, Ø Please be informed that I the Statutory Declaration was granted and
will be heard 18/12/2014 Kind Regards Mark Dredge Customer Services SE Group Bexley Bromley Greenwich Magistrates' Courts 1 London Road Bromley BR1 1RA 0208 437 3500 Gold Fax 0870 324 0223 From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 November 2014 12:44 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Dear Miss S E Leslie Ø Thank you for the reply to my email, Ø I did in fact speak to someone at the court yesterday Mr Mark Dredge
as I explained my son was due in court yesterday on a next matter of no
insurance when he was insured. After speaking to that court, they told me to ask
the CPS dealing with that case to deal with the other 2 matters of no
insurance which my son never got a summons for. Ø Mark Dredge told me the case at Bromley was in fact a date of 20/05/2014
so I attended court with my son yesterday with my son’s insurance papers for
that date. Ø I did ask the CPS yesterday to deal with these other 2 matters, but
she said she could not, and I would have to contract the court which I had
told her I had already done. Ø Please see attached file of my son’s insurance. Ø You can contact me on 07961. Regards Miss Lorraine Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra [Mail To:sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] On Behalf Of GLBROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 27 November 2014 12:01 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Morning Miss Cordell Ø Thank you for your email, please could you email me your mobile number
to discuss this matter further. Regards Miss S E Leslie 1207, From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 November 2014 14:12 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell To Whom It May Concern: Ø I am writing this email
due to a letter from the court that my son Simon Cordell DOB 26/01/2014
had a case on the 06/11/2014 in Bromley Magistrates
Court Ø It says on the letter it
was for a case of no insurance the case number is 011402647845. Ø The problem is we did
not know he was due to come to court on this date we have had no summons and
my son is insured he always has insurance and would not drive without it. Ø There has been a number
of issues with his insurance and this is due to it not showing up on the MID
database. Ø There has been a number
of Seizers to his vehicles for no insurance when he was in fact insured. Ø Could you please send
me details of what date this offence of no insurance happened? Ø This way I can send the
correct insurance policy by email. and can work forward to clearing this
matter up. Regards Lorraine Cordell This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet antivirus
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisations IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email (and any attachment) is
intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email.
Internet email is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding
whether to send material in response to this message by email. This email
(whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and
retained by the Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may
be used, and email content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility
to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their
contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the
Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email
has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This
email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet antivirus service
supplied by Vodafone 1208, in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.)
In case of problems, please call your organisations IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet
email is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted
and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to
send material in response to this message by email. This email (whether you
are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by
the Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used,
and email content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to
ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their
contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the
Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email
has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This file is missing From: MT Underwriting [MT.Underwriting@canopius.com] To: Gramlick, Les Sent: 04 December 2014
15:34:12 Subject: FW: MR SIMON
CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Kelly Tiller Ø Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14
Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9116 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com |
||||
|
|
|
05/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
06/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 408. GL-BROMLEYMCENQ_RE_
Simon Cordell_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1209,1210 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ 3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 409. Dredge, Mark Simon Cordell 1402647845 Stat
Dec Insurance / Page
Numbers: 1214,1215,1216,1217 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ “Was Missing took from the 09/12/2014” |
08/12/2014 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 408. GL-BROMLEYMCENQ_RE_
Simon Cordell_ (2) /
Page Numbers: 1209,1210, From: GLBROMLEYMCENQ [glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 08 December 2014 13:55 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Ø
This is an
automatically generated message acknowledging your recent E Mail to the
Customer Service Team. Ø
Please note a full
reply will only be sent if appropriate. Ø
Please DO NOT re‐submit
your enquiry by E Mail, fax or letter as duplicates create unnecessary
paperwork and delays. CONTACT DETAILS FOR BROMLEY
ADMINISTRATION CENTRE (for Bromley, Bexley and Greenwich Magistrates Courts) as
follows: Telephone: 020 8437 3500 or 020 8437
3585 Gold fax: 0870 324 0223 E Mail: GL‐BromleyMCSummons@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for ongoing summons case
enquiries) GL‐BromleyMCEnq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for all concluded case
enquiries) GL‐BromleyMCList@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for ongoing charge case
& Legal Aid enquiries) SEGroupResultingEnquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for Court result enquiries) Other
useful E Mail contacts: GL‐CAO.CORRESPOND@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for all fines enquiries) Enquiries@bromley.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk (for Civil Proceeding
enquiries) Thank
you, Customer
Service Team This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the
attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is
not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read
by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send
material in response to this message by email. This email (whether you are
the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the
Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and
email content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure
laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning 1210, service supplied by Vodafone
in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This
email has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 409. Dredge, Mark__ Simon Cordell 1402647845
Stat Dec Insurance /
Page Numbers: 1214,1215,1216,1217, -- 1214 From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 08 December 2014 13:55 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear
Mark Dredge Ø My son has already filed a
Statutory Declaration at Highbury magistrates court on the 02/12/2014. Ø We do know the points have
been removed from his driving Licence. Ø But could you please explain
what we can do now and where to send his insurance to be checked so that no
more of the courts time is wasted. Regards |
||||
|
|
|
09/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
10/12/2014 Dredge, Mark Customer Services SE Group Bexley Bromley
Greenwich Magistrates' Courts 3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 409. Dredge, Mark Simon Cordell 1402647845 Stat
Dec Insurance / Page
Numbers: 1214,1215,1216,1217 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court – 011401009802
= GL-SWESTERNMCENQ 4 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 410. Lorraine Cordell Re
Simon Cordell 1402647845 Stat Dec Insurance / Page
Numbers: 1218,1219,1220,1221,1222 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ |
10/12/2014 |
|
|
|
3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 409. Dredge, Mark__ Simon Cordell 1402647845
Stat Dec Insurance /
Page Numbers: 1214,1215,1216,1217, From: Dredge, Mark [Mark.Dredge@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 10 December 2014 11:53 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: Simon Cordell 1402647845 Stat
Dec Insurance Dear Lorraine, Ø
Thank you for your
email I must apologise for the delay in getting back to you, it would seem
that you will have to go through the court system and “waste the courts time”
again this is unfortunate and a shame but we must work through the procedures
that are set. Ø
I was more concerned
with wasting your time as a customer and it seems that you will have to put
in for a Statutory Declaration her at Bromley under you case ref gives below.
Ø
This will be
completed in one morning and hopefully this will be the end of the matter Kind
Regards Mark
Dredge Customer
Services SE
Group Bexley Bromley Greenwich Magistrates'
Courts 1
London Road Bromley BR1
1RA 0208
437 3500 Gold Fax 0870 324 0223 From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 08 December 2014 13:55 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Dear Mark Dredge Ø My son has already filed a Statutory Declaration at Highbury
magistrates court on the 02/12/2014. Ø We do know the points have been removed from his driving Licence. Ø But could you please explain what we can do now and where to send his
insurance to be checked so that no more of the courts time is wasted. Regards From: Dredge, Mark [Mail
To: Mark.Dredge@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] On Behalf Of GLBROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 03 December 2014 15:48 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Dear Lorraine, Ø Thank you for your email as it appears that your attempt to deal with
the prosecution in one go was not a success. Ø This will mean that your Son will have to complete a Statutory
Declaration at Bromley Magistrates Court. Ø I would suggest that you either ring the court or email to confirm
when your son heard about the case. Often this easiest dealt with over the
phone and we can book your son in a Statutory Declaration in one of Bromley’s
Traffic Courts. Kind Regards Mark Dredge Customer Services SE Group Bexley Bromley Greenwich Magistrates' Courts 1 London Road Bromley 1215, BR1 1RA 0208 437 3500 Gold Fax 0870 324 0223 From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 November 2014 12:44 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Dear Miss S E Leslie Ø Thank you for the reply to my email, Ø I did in fact speak to someone at the court yesterday Mr Mark Dredge
as I explained my son was due in court yesterday on a next matter of no
insurance when he was insured. After speaking to that court, they told me to
ask the CPS dealing with that case to deal with the other 2 matters of no
insurance which my son never got a summons for. Ø Mark Dredge told me the case at Bromley was in fact a date of 20/05/2014
so I attended court with my son yesterday with my son’s insurance papers
for that date. Ø I did ask the CPS yesterday to deal with these other 2 matters, but
she said she could not, and I would have to contract the court which I had
told her I had already done. Ø Please see attached file of my son’s insurance. Ø You can contact me on 07961. Regards Miss Lorraine Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra [Mail
To:sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] On Behalf Of GLBROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 27 November 2014 12:01 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Morning Miss Cordell Ø Thank you for your email, please could you email me your mobile number
to discuss this matter Ø further. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 November 2014 14:12 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell To Whom It May Concern: Ø I am writing this email
due to a letter from the court that my son Simon Cordell DOB 26/01/2014
had a case on the 06/11/2014 in Bromley Magistrates
Court Ø It says on the letter
it was for a case of no insurance the case number is 011402647845. Ø The problem is we did
not know he was due to come to court on this date we have had no summons and
my son is insured he always has insurance and would not drive without it. Ø There has been a number
of issues with his insurance and this is due to it not showing up on the MID
database. Ø There has been a number
of Seizers to his vehicles for no insurance when he was in fact insured. Ø Could you please send
me details of what date this offence of no insurance happened? Ø This way I can send the
1216, Ø correct insurance policy by email. and can work forward to clearing
this matter up. Regards Lorraine Cordell This email was scanned by the
Government Secure Intranet antivirus service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of
problems, please call your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the
GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies
and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure medium.
Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else.
Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response
to this message by email. This email (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content
may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The original
of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet antivirus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec.
(CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your
organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you
are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the
sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure medium. Any reply to
this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that
in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by
email. This email (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be 1217, monitored, recorded, and retained by
the Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used,
and email content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to
ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email was scanned by the
Government Secure Intranet antivirus service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of
problems, please call your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the
GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is
not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure
medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone
else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in
response to this message by email. This email (whether you are the sender or
the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of Justice.
Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken
when composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 410. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ _
Simon Cordell 1402647845 Stat Dec Insurance /
Page Numbers: 1218,1219,1220,1221,1222, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 December 2014 15:32 To: 'Dredge, Mark' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1402647845 Stat
Dec Insurance Dear
Mark Dredge Ø My son has filed a Statutory
Declaration, Ø which we were told could be
done at any court this was for the Bromley. Ø It was filed at Highbury
magistrate’s court on the 02/12/2014 and we have checked with DVLA and
the points have been removed for the Bromley case. Regards Lorraine From: Dredge, Mark [Mail To: Mark.Dredge@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 10 December 2014 11:53 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: Simon Cordell 1402647845 Stat
Dec Insurance Dear
Lorraine, Ø Thank you for your email Ø I must apologise for the
delay in getting back to you, Ø it would seem that you will
have to go through the court system and “waste the courts time” Ø again, this is unfortunate and
a shame Ø but we must work through the
procedures that are set. Ø I was more concerned with
wasting your time Ø as a customer Ø and it seems that you will
have to put in for a Statutory Declaration her at Bromley under you case ref
gives below. Ø This will be completed in one
morning and hopefully this will be the end of the matter Kind
Regards Mark
Dredge Customer
Services SE
Group Bexley Bromley Greenwich Magistrates'
Courts 1
London Road Bromley BR1
1RA 0208
437 3500 Gold Fax 0870 324 0223 From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail
To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 08 December 2014 13:55 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Dear Mark Dredge Ø My son has already filed a Statutory Declaration at Highbury
magistrates court on the 02/12/2014. Ø We do know the points have been removed from his driving Licence. Ø But could you please explain what we can do now and where to send his
insurance to be checked so that no more of the courts time is wasted. Regards From: Dredge, Mark [Mail
To: Mark.Dredge@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] On Behalf Of
GLBROMLEYMCENQ 1219, Sent: 03 December 2014 15:48 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Dear Lorraine, Ø Thank you for your email as it appears that your attempt to deal with
the prosecution in one go was not a success. Ø This will mean that your Son will have to complete a Statutory
Declaration at Bromley Magistrates Court. Ø I would suggest that you either ring the court or email to confirm
when your son heard about the case. Often this easiest dealt with over the
phone and we can book your son in a Statutory Declaration in one of Bromley’s
Traffic Courts. Kind Regards Mark Dredge Customer Services SE Group Bexley Bromley Greenwich Magistrates' Courts 1 London Road Bromley BR1 1RA 0208 437 3500 Gold Fax 0870 324 0223 From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail
To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 November 2014 12:44 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Dear Miss S E Leslie Ø Thank you for the reply to my email, Ø I did in fact speak to someone at the court yesterday Mr Mark Dredge as
I explained my son was due in court yesterday on a next matter of no
insurance when he was insured. After speaking to that court, they told me to
ask the CPS dealing with that case to deal with the other 2 matters of no
insurance which my son never got a summons for. Ø Mark Dredge told me the case at Bromley was in fact a date of 20/05/2014
so I attended court with my son yesterday with my son’s insurance papers for
that date. Ø I did ask the CPS yesterday to deal with these other 2 matters, but
she said she could not, and I would have to contract the court which I had
told her I had already done. Ø Please see attached file of my son’s insurance. Ø You can contact me on 07961. Regards Miss Lorraine Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra [Mail
To:sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] On Behalf Of GLBROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 27 November 2014 12:01 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon
Cordell Morning Miss Cordell Ø Thank you for your email, please could you email me your mobile number
to discuss this matter further. further. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine
Cordell [Mail
To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] 1220,1221,1222, |
||||
|
|
|
11/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/12/2014 |
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 411. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell Information / Page
Numbers: 1223 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
28/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 411. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell Information /
Page Numbers: 1223, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 28 December 2014 23:59 To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Information Hello
Martin Ø Can you please get back to me
with an update as I not heard anything from KGM about the email I sent over
to you on the 30/11/2014 with the data that would be needed? Ø I also have not heard
anything from you about the section 9 witness statement. Ø Please can you get back to me
as soon as possible. Regards Lorraine |
||||
|
|
|
29/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/12/2014 |
|
|
|
|
Diary sorted for sure up to this point! |
31/12/2014 |
|
|
Simulation January 2015
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
January
2015 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
01/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
02/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
03/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
04/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
05/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
06/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 414. Martin Jenkin _RE_
Simon Cordell Information / Page Numbers: 1250 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
07/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 414. Martin Jenkin
_RE_ Simon Cordell Information / Page Numbers: 1250, From: Martin Jenkin [martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 07 January 2015 09:06 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Information Good Morning Lorraine, Ø Apologies for the lack of contact, Ø I have been in and out of the office. Ø Have you received any correspondence from KGM?
Ø we spoke to them prior to Christmas regarding
the issues Ø and they have been looking into the situation Ø and as far as I am aware, they were going to
respond directly. Ø I look forward to hearing from you. Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 cid: image001.png@01CC9FAC t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843 594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488. This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for
the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged
and confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you
must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible
and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the
right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 28 December 2014 23:59 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Information Hello Martin Ø Can you please get back to me with an update as I not heard anything
from KGM about the email I sent over to you on the 30/11/2014 with the
data that would be needed? Ø I also have not heard anything from you about the section 9 witness
statement. Ø Please can you get back to me as soon as possible. Regards Lorraine |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
08/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
09/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
10/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
11/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
12/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
13/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
14/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
15/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
16/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
17/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
18/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
19/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
20/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
42. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 42 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_01.21.2015_FW MT3574694 21/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 287,288 289,290,291,292,293,294 295,296,297 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 415. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ MT3574694_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1255,1256,1257 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 416. Austin, Andrew _RE_
MT3574694 / Page Numbers: 1258,1259,1260,1261 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 417. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ MT3574694_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1262,1263,1264,1265,1266 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 5 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 418. Austin, Andrew _RE_
MT3574694_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1267,1268,1269,1270 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 6 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 419. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ MT3574694 / Page Numbers: 1271,1272,1273,1274,1275,1276,1277 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! 7 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 420. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._
MT3574694 / Page Numbers: 1278,1279,1280,1281,1282,1283,1284 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank! |
21/01/2015 |
22:53:00 |
X11 287,288 289,290,291,292 293,294,295,296 297, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
43. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 43 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_01.21.2015_RE MT3574694 21/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 298,299,300 301,302,303,304,305,306 307,308 |
21/01/2015 |
22:51:00 |
X11 298,299,300 301,302,303,304 305,306,307,308 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
44. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 44 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_01.21.2015_RE MT3574694_002 21/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 309,310,311,312 313,314,315,316,317,318 |
21/01/2015 |
11:31:00 |
X10 309,310,311,312 313,314,315,316 317,318, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
42. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 42 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_01.21.2015_FW MT3574694 21/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 287,288 289,290,291,292,293,294 295,296,297 -- 287, 21/01/2015 From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 21 January 2015
22:53 To: 'Andrew.Austin@canopius.com' Cc: 'complaints@lloyds.com' Subject: FW: MT3574694 Attachments: S Cordell Cert._
KGM_ 2013-2014_Colour.pdf. Information we
need.pdf Dear Andrew Ø Please see attached
Insurance, which will show you full details of his insurance policy and dates
covered. Ø Yes, we do want
full discloser so this mater can be sorted out by the court and I can send the
information over to the CPS for the case of the 14/11/2013 where the
police officer told KGM I had tools in my van to void my insurance. Ø Kelly Tiller from
the trade section and Jessica know fully what went on and it was Jessica that
took the phone call from the police officer. Ø After this I
believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my policy and she was the one
that had the say to cancel my policy and she was the one that believed the
police until I went to the police compound and spoke to the manager there
where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. Ø If I had not done
this Kelly Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have all
the emails to prove this. Ø After Kelly Tiller found
out I was not lying about having no tools in my van the insurance policy was
kept in place, I did ask Kelly Tiller on more than once to send me the
information and put data requests in which was not replied to. Ø Now I have been
found guilty when Kelly Tiller knows the truth that there was not tools and
the police officer lied to KGM on the phone call. Ø I am the one that
has suffered over all this not just on this case but all the times I have
been taken to court for no insurance over the year my policy run with KGM due
to it not showing on the MID database. Ø You should have all
the emails already from Broadsure Direct and many was sent by them to KGM as
I was told KGM could not talk to me and I had to deal with Broadsure Direct
about my policy Martin Jenkins from Broadsure Direct should also have copies
of all emails as I do. Ø I have spoken to
DVLA today and asked for the data of how many times points was put on my
licence due to not getting summons from police and then dealing with cases I
knew nothing about and then I had to get the cases reopened, I have to write
them a letter and they will send the data I have asked for in the post. Ø I do have a lot of
letters which I will sort out scan and send over. Ø But the 1st part I
want to deal with is the court case I was found guilty at and have put an
appeal in that is the most important to me right now. Ø We can deal with
everything else once I get all the data scanned as there is really a lot and
it was all due to KGM not sorting out why my insurance was not showing on the
MID database. Ø The seizers alone
have left me out of pocket by around £1700.00. Ø That is without all
the days I have not been able to work due to my driving licence being messed
up and showing points for no insurance. Ø All the time going back
and forward to the compound to collect my vehicles, and everything else I
have had to deal with the courts when in fact I had done nothing wrong. Ø I have tried to
deal with this for months and months without going to the ombudsman and KGM
has taken no notice, it has taken me to go to the ombudsman for KGM to take
any notice and I don’t feel anyone would be happy with this sort of service
from KGM let alone any company doing this and causing someone so much
suffering. Ø It was one of the
police in the end at the compound who in the end worked out why it was not
showing up on the MID and that was because there had been a space put within
my Reg Numbers. Ø It was that bad two
police compounds new me and said each time not again. 288, Ø As you can see, I
am not very happy about all of this, but I do not think anyone would be when
they paid for their insurance and had done nothing wrong to suffer all this. Ø Therefore, could
you please get the information I need to send to the CPS; I have written what
was needed from Nov 2014 and way before this, and it still has not been sent
and I have this hanging over my head. I did not just get points on my licence
I got disqualified from driving for 6 months due to repeat offending of no
insurance please tell me why when I have paid for my insurance from KGM? The
reason it has not been enforced is due to me putting an appeal in. Ø You can contact my
mother on Regards Simon
Cordell 21/01/2015 From: Austin, Andrew mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Sent: 21 January 2015
16:13 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
I have detailed the
process for requesting information under the subject access request and if
you wish to proceed with this please confirm. Ø
In the meantime, I
am keen to assist you if I can in confirming when cover was in force. Ø
Please can you
confirm if there is a contact number, I can call you or your Mother on and a
time that is acceptable so that I can try and help resolve this particular
issue for you. Ø
I look forward to
hearing from you with this information. Regards, Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting
Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division
of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 | M 07469 147743 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com 21/01/2015 From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015
13:22 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Andrew Ø I will forward this
to you within a few days I will ask the police compound to do a full print
out as to all the tickets as I believe there is a few missing. Ø I do have around 6
of the tickets here when the vehicles were sized, I also do have court
letters, and letters from DVLA, which I will forward over to you once I have
scanned then in so please give me a few days and I will get back to you with
this information as there is a lot of data. 289, Ø The main one at
this time I am worried about is the case where the vehicle was sized due to
the police lying and me being found guilty at court you did have an email on
the 30 November 2014 about what was needed and I do have the court
letter showing I was found guilty and about the appeal. Ø This data should
have been given under the Subject access request under the Data Protection
Act 1998 I put in, so was wondering what you can do about this and if you
will need a new Subj etc. Ø access request
under the Data Protection Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in so to do a 4th I
do not feel I should need to do. Ø KGM have in fact
did not follow the protocol for the Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998 which has been put in 3 times already to KGM, I will be
addressing this with the Information Commissioner’s Office as I do not see
any reason you would have to stop the information, Ø I have asked for
under this act to prove I was not in fact guilty of no insurance. Ø And now say to deal
with this you need information from me. Ø I can understand
you want the information for the complaint that has been put in, but not the
information I asked for to show I was in fact I was insured for an appeal
that is ongoing. Ø And in fact, would
not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under the Data Protection
Act 1998 as I would not have been found guilty. Ø I would like the
data sent to the court as soon as possible in regard to this so they can look
at the facts and see if fact I was insured so there should be no need for the
appeal to go ahead with more of my time wasted going to court. Regards Simon Cordell 21/01/2015 From: Austin, Andrew mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Sent: 21 January 2015
11:54 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank you for your
email. Ø My letter dated 22/12/2014
requests the following documentary evidence from you Ø With regards to any
losses that may have been incurred as a result of the above, I confirm as detailed
in my previous letter, I require the following: -
Ø Once I receive all
of the above, I will be happy to consider this further. Ø With regards to
your subject access request. Ø My letter of the 09/12/2014
advised the following: - Ø Following our
initial investigations, we note that you submitted a subject access request
to your Broker. Should you wish to proceed with this, please can you formally
request this in writing to our Data Protection Officer at the address
detailed at the foot of the letter including a cheque payable to KGM
Insurance for the sum of £10.00. 290, Ø Alternatively, you
may wish to wait until our full investigations have been finalised. Ø Can you please
confirm how you wish to proceed with that request? Ø Should you not be
in receipt of any of the letters I refer to advise me above, please and I
will ensure copies are sent to you immediately. Ø
I await your reply Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting
Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division
of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ 21/01/2015 From: Lorraine Cordell mailto:
lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015
11:31 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 To Whom It May
Concern: Ø I am writing due to
the complaint I put in. Ø I have forwarded
emails to Broadsure Direct and spoken to Broadsure Direct who took the policy
of insurance out policy no: MT3574694 Ø I have been asking
for information from KGM since 2013 and have heard nothing back. Ø When the policy was
taken out there was some reason it did not show up on the MID database
Broadsure Direct and KGM was aware of this. Ø Due to this fact I
had my vehicles were sized a number of times I believe 8 or 9 times in all,
where I had to pay the costs to get my vehicles out the compound each time. Ø In the week when I
was pulled by police it was not so bad as the insurance company was opened so
when I showed the police my policy, they could call the insurance company. Ø The seizers
happened mostly at the weekend mostly due to the insurance company being
closed and the police could not talk to anyone even when I had my policy on
me at all times to prove I did in fact have insurance. Ø I made many calls
to the police, Broadsure Direct, KGM and the people who run the MID database,
but the issue did not go away, and my vehicles still did not show up on the
MID database. Ø There was also a
time in Nov 2013 when my van was sized this was due to KGM telling the police
I was not insured due to the police telling KGM that I had tools in my van. Ø Which was a lie by
the police as I did not have anything in my van. Ø Kelly Tiller from
the trade section was dealing with this and a few days later I got a letter
from KGM saying they was going to cancel my policy. Ø As you can
understand I was very upset over this as I had done nothing wrong. Ø At this time lots
of calls was both made to KMG and Broadsure to stop the cancelation of my
insurance policy, I spoke to Kelly Tiller many times, but she believed the
police and I had no say in the matter. Ø The police were off
duty so I could not speak to them and Kelly Tiller was saying unless I could
prove I did not have any tools in my van then the insurance policy would be
cancelled which was very unfair as I had done nothing wrong, I knew I never
had any tools. Ø But I also asked
Kelly Tiller did the police tell her what tools was meant to be in my van, to
which she said no. Ø KGM was not even 291, Ø aware I had
mechanics trade on my policy so if my mechanics tools had been in my van at
the time my insurance would still have been cancelled which to me what was
the point in having insurance? Ø I then spoke to a
wonderful operator at the police when I called told her what had gone on and
was told by her to go to the police compound as when any vehicles are taken
there, they have to do a full list of items that are in the vehicles as they
are in fact legible if something goes missing. Ø Over that weekend I
sent emails to the compound and forwarded them to Broadsure as my insurance
was due to be cancelled on the Monday. Ø On Monday I got an
email from Broadsure direct asking me to go to the compound as Kelly Tiller
had no luck getting a reply from them also, and once there to call Kelly
Tiller due to the time on the Monday I got the email it would have been too
late to go the compound and get a call to Kelly Tiller as she would have
ended work for that day so I sent an email saying I would be going there
early the next morning. Ø I went the next day
and asked to speak to the manager of the compound who in fact looked up my
van and said nothing was in there, there was not tools I called Kelly Tiller
and the manager of the compound spoke to her and confirmed there was nothing
in the van when it was taken there by police and that I had put thing in the
van when I had taken it out of the compound. Ø At this point Kelly
tiller believed me and said the policy would not be cancelled. Ø But on my way back
from the compound driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and it
was Broadsure direct saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was very
upset at this and told them what had happened, I was asked to hold on they
was called KGM back and would call me right back. Ø I waited till
Broadsure direct called me back and confirmed my insurance policy had not
been cancelled then drove home. Ø From this point I
have been asking for all information and putting data protection acts in
which have not been dealt with and I have heard nothing from KGM. Ø I have been back
and forward to court due to no insurance and in fact 4 cases I did not get
any summons so was in fact found guilty as I did not know it was even going
to court. Ø I have had points
put on my driving licence for no reason and had to go back and forward to court
many times when this should not have been the case. Ø Then the case come
up for the seizer when the police said I had tools in my van I went to court
with all my documents but due to not having the information I had asked for
from KGM many times about that case I was found guilty. Ø I am very upset
about the whole policy with KGM. Ø I have put an
appeal in, and this case will be going to crown court I have again asked for
information and again heard nothing. Ø These matters need
to be addressed as I am suffering due to all of this. Ø Martin Jenkins at
Broadsure Direct knows everything that has gone on as he was my main contact. Ø I also have all the
emails the last one that I will enclose again, which I have heard nothing
about and the 1st Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998
that I sent on the 26/11/2013. Ø I did in fact send
the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 about time
times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into why I had heard nothing about
more than once. Ø Once I get the
appeal date for crown court, I will ask the court to summons the people at
KGM to deal with this matter as they know I was insurance and did nothing
wrong and the police lied. Ø All I have asked
for is the data so there will be no need to summons people this way I can
send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown and the other
information and this case should be dropped against me. Ø It just seemed that
KGM does not want to do anything and give me the information I need to prove
in fact I was insurance and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it that I
was not insurance. Ø There is a lot more
I could say about the insurance I had with KGM, but this insurance policy was
my worst nightmare. Ø It has 292, messed my clean
driving licence up and in fact got to the point I could not drive so could
not work. Ø Due to the fact,
KGM could not send me the information over that was needed to prove I did
have insurance. Ø If you need o can
send over all the emails that has been sent back and forward to Broadsure who
sent them to KGM. Ø I have lost a lot
of money, and time due to this insurance policy I have had to pay for my
vehicles to be taken out of the police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost
of £180.00 to £200.00 a time. Ø All the loss of work
due to having to take time to go to the police compound, and all the times I
have had to go to court for no insurance when in fact I had insurance. Ø And points put on
my driving licence to the fact I could not drive, this has all been costs to
myself. Ø My Mother Lorraine
Cordell has also written many of the emails and is fine with dealing with
this issue. Regards Simon Cordell Confidentiality
Caution The information in
this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the
intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify the sender
immediately. Canopius may
monitor the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings
UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing
Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential
Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the
Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius
Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed representative
of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered
number 02733994 293, KGM Motor Insurance
is a brand name for business written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Registered office: Gallery 9,
One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality
Caution The information in
this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the
intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify the sender
immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and received
via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful business
purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which
includes: Canopius Holdings
UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing
Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential
Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the
Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius
Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed representative
of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered
number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance
is a brand name for business written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Registered office: Gallery 9,
One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales 294,
End of Picture! 295, FW: MT3574fpage on we
need.pdf 30/11/2014 From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 November 2014
14:47 To: ’Martin Jenkin’ Subject: RE: REF:
00-COSX14MT07-ID<80> Open Attach Documents Hi Martin Ø
Thank you for
getting back to me about this matter, and for you contacting KGM and getting
this addressed, please see the below information that will be needed. Ø
We will also still
need the section 9 witness statement from you. Ø
The below section is
what will be needed from KGM. Section 9 witness
statement from: Ø Jessica about the call that she took, from
the police officer who called KGM after Simon Cordell was stopped on the 14/11/2013.
Ø This statement will include what was said on
the phone call by the police officer and what Jessica said to the police
officer this would also include what sort of tools the police officer said
there was in the van. Ø Any other information as to the date of the 14/11/2013
and after this date as to any dealing Jessica had with the stop on the 14/11/2013. Ø Copy of all phone recordings between the
police officer, and Jessica on the date of 14/11/2013. Ø All phone recordings of any calls that were
made, to KGM from Simon Cordell or Lorraine Cordell to try to stop his
insurance policy being cancelled and to address the stop that was made on the
14/11/2013. Ø The phone recording of when Kelly Tiller had
asked Simon Cordell to go to the police compound and get someone from the
compound to call Kelly Tiller about the list of tools that was meant to have
been in the van when the police stopped Mr |Simon Cordell on the 14/11/2013.
Ø I believe Simon Cordell went to the police
compound on the 26/11/2013 and this is where the manager of the
compound and Simon Cordell spoke to called Kelly Tiller and confirmed there
was in fact no tools in the van. Ø Copies of all emails that were sent from KGM
to Broadsure and Broadsure to KGM with regard to the police stop of Simon
Cordell on the 14/11/2013. Ø This would include all emails of dates after
the 14/11/2014 when Simon Cordell was trying to stop his insurance policy
from being cancelled and was trying to address this matter of what the police
had said about there being tools in his Van which was why the insurance
policy was going to be cancelled. Section 9 witness
statement from: Ø Kelly Tiller as to any dealing she had with
the police stop on Simon Cordell on the 14/11/2013. Ø This would include all dealing with
Broadsure about this matter and any calls that was made to her by Simon
Cordell and Lorraine Cordell, and any calls Kelly Tiller made about this
matter about the cancellation of the policy and the stop by the police on the
14/11/2014 until this issue was addressed. Ø This would also include all details of the
call that was made by the police compound to Kelly Tiller on the 26/11/2013
to prove there were no tools in the van. Ø Which in turn stopped the cancelation of the
insurance policy as I believe the reason for the cancellation was due to
Kelly Tiller saying he had voided his insurance due to there being tools in
the van. Ø Full details as to why the insurance policy
was going to be cancelled and what Mr Simon Cordell was meant to have done
wrong which would have in fact made his insurance policy void. Ø file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 296, Page 2 of 3 Ø Full details as to why in the end the
insurance policy was not cancelled and the reasons for not cancelling which
was due to Mr Simon Cordell going to the police compound and the police
compound confirming to Kelly Tiller over the phone there was in fact no tools
in the van. Ø The reason why until Jan 2014 that Mr Simon
Cordell’s insurance did not show up on the MID database. Ø Confirmation Simon Cordell did have
insurance to drive on the 14/11/2014 and did not void his insurance in any
way. Ø Why Kelly Tiller did not deal with all the
data protection requests that had been submitted to KGM, under the data
protection act 1998 subject access request, as if this had been done Simon
Cordell would not be in the court system for this case. Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [mailto: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 28 November 2014 14:36 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: REF: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<80>
Open Attach Documents Lorraine, Ø I have spoken to the
manager at KGM and he has advised Andy Austin is detailing with the case. Ø They have asked for a
clear email for me to send to them of your requirements. Ø Please could you email
what is required for me to forward on! (unfortunately, Kelly is on annual
leave at present) Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 Broadsure Direct - Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax
Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e-mail in file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 297, Page 3 of 3 error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the
message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor
e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 END 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 415. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ MT3574694_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1255,1256,1257, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31 To: 'andrew.austin@canopius.com' Cc: 'complaints@lloyds.com' Subject:
RE: MT3574694 Attachments: RE_ REF_ 00COSX14MT07ID_80_ Open Attach
Documents.pdf RE_ SimonCordell.pdf; Data Protection KGM.doc Kelly Tiller KGM.doc To Whom It May Concern: I am writing due to the
complaint I put in. I have forwarded emails to Broadsure Direct and spoken to
Broadsure Direct who took the policy of insurance out policy no: MT3574694 I
have been asking for information from KGM since 2013 and have heard
nothing back. When the policy was taken out there was some reason it did not
show up on the MID database Broadsure Direct and KGM was aware of this. Due
to this fact I had my vehicles were sized a number of times I believe 8 or 9
times in all, where I had to pay the costs to get my vehicles out the
compound each time. In the week when I was pulled by police it was not so bad
as the insurance company was opened so when I showed the police my policy,
they could call the insurance company. The seizers happened mostly at the
weekend mostly due to the insurance company being closed and the police could
not talk to anyone even when I had my policy on me at all times to prove I
did in fact have insurance. I made many calls to the police, Broadsure
Direct, KGM and the people who run the MID database, but the issue did not go
away and my vehicles still did not show up on the MID database. There was
also a time in Nov 2013 when my van was sized this was due to KGM
telling the police I was not insured due to the police telling KGM that I had
tools in my van. Which was a lie by the police as I did not have anything in
my van. Kelly Tiller from the trade section was dealing with this and a few
days later I got a letter from KGM saying they was going to cancel my policy.
As you can understand I was very upset over this as I had done nothing wrong.
At these times lots of calls was both made to KMG and Broadsure to stop the
cancelation of my insurance policy, I spoke to Kelly Tiller many times, but
she believed the police and I had no say in the matter. The police were off
duty so I could not speak to them and Kelly Tiller was saying unless I could
prove I did not have any tools in my van then the insurance policy would be
cancelled which was very unfair as I had done nothing wrong, I knew I never
had any tools. But I also asked Kelly Tiller did the police tell her what tools
was meant to be in my van, to which she said no. KGM was not even aware I had
mechanics trade on my policy so if my mechanics tools had been in my van at
the time my insurance would still have been cancelled which to me what was
the point in having insurance? I then spoke to a
wonderful operator at the police when I called told her what had gone on and
was told by her to go to the police compound as when any vehicles are taken
there, they have to do a full list of items that are in the vehicles as they are
in fact legible if something goes missing. Over that weekend I sent emails to
the compound and forwarded them to Broadsure as my insurance was due to be
cancelled on the Monday. On Monday I got an email from Broadsure direct
asking me to go to the compound as Kelly Tiller had no luck getting a reply
from them also, and once there to call Kelly Tiller due to the time on the
Monday I got the email it would have been too late to go the compound 1256, and get a call to Kelly
Tiller as she would have ended work for that day so I sent an email saying I
would be going there early the next morning. I went the next day and asked to
speak to the manager of the compound who in fact looked up my van and said
nothing was in there, there was not tools I called Kelly Tiller and the
manager of the compound spoke to her and confirmed there was nothing in the
van when it was taken there by police and that I had put thing in the van
when I had taken it out of the compound. At this point Kelly tiller believed
me and said the policy would not be cancelled. But on my way back from the
compound driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and it was
Broadsure direct saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was very upset
at this and told them what had happened, I was asked to hold on they was
called KGM back and would call me right back. I waited till Broadsure direct
called me back and confirmed my insurance policy had not been cancelled then
drove home. From this point I have been asking for all information and putting
data protection acts in which have not been dealt with and I have heard
nothing from KGM. I have been back and forward to court due to no insurance
and in fact 4 cases I did not get any summons so was in fact found guilty as
I did not know it was even going to court. I have had points put on my
driving licence for no reason and had to go back and forward to court many
times when this should not have been the case. Then the case come up for the
seizer when the police said I had tools in my van I went to court with all my
documents but due to not having the information I had asked for from KGM many
times about that case I was found guilty. I am very upset about the whole
policy with KGM. I have put an appeal in, and this case will be going to
crown court I have again asked for information and again heard nothing. These
matters need to be addressed as I am suffering due to all of this. Martin
Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows everything that has gone on as he was my
main contact. I also have all the emails the last one that I will enclose
again, which I have heard nothing about and the 1st Subject access request
under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the 26/11/2013. I
did in fact send the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act
1998 about time times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into why I had heard
nothing about more than once. Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I
will ask the court to summon the people at KGM to deal with this matter as
they know I was insurance and did nothing wrong and the police lied. All I
have asked for is the data so there will be no need to summons people this
way I can send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown and the
other information and this case should be dropped against me. It just seemed
that KGM does not want to do anything and give me the information I need to
prove in fact I was insurance and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it
that I was not insurance. There is a lot more I could say about the insurance
I had with KGM, but this insurance policy was my worst nightmare. It has
messed my clean driving licence up and in fact got to the point I could not
drive so could not work. Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the
information over that was needed to prove I did have insurance. If you need o
can send over all the emails that has been sent back and forward to Broadsure
who sent them to KGM. 1257, I have lost a lot of
money, and time due to this insurance policy I have had to pay for my
vehicles to be taken out of the police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost
of £180.00 to £200.00 a time. All the loss of work due to having to take time
to go to the police compound, and all the times I have had to go to court for
no insurance when in fact I had insurance. And points put on my driving
licence to the fact I could not drive, this has all been costs to myself. My
Mother Lorraine Cordell has also written many of the emails and is fine with
dealing with this issue. Regards Simon Cordell 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 416. Austin, Andrew _RE_ MT3574694 / Page Numbers: 1258,1259,1260,1261, From: Austin, Andrew [Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell Thank you for your email. My letter dated 22/12/14
requests the following documentary evidence from you with regards to any
losses that may have been incurred as a result of the above, I confirm as detailed
in my previous letter, I require the following:
Following our initial
investigations, we note that you submitted a subject access request to your
Broker. Should you wish to proceed with this, please can you formally request
this in writing to our Data Protection Officer at the address detailed at the
foot of the letter including a cheque payable to KGM Insurance for the sum of
£10.00. Alternatively, you may wish to wait until our full investigations
have been finalised. Can you please confirm how you wish to proceed with that
request? Should you not be in receipt of any of the letters I refer to above,
please advise me and I will ensure copies are sent to you immediately. I await your reply Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM
Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing due to the
complaint I put in. I have forwarded emails to Broadsure Direct and spoken to
Broadsure Direct who took the policy of insurance out policy no: MT3574694 1259, I have been asking for
information from KGM since 2013 and have heard nothing back. When the
policy was taken out there was some reason it did not show up on the MID
database Broadsure Direct and KGM was aware of this. Due to this fact I had
my vehicles were sized a number of times I believe 8 or 9 times in all, where
I had to pay the costs to get my vehicles out the compound each time. In the
week when I was pulled by police it was not so bad as the insurance company
was opened so when I showed the police my policy, they could call the
insurance company. The seizers happened mostly at the weekend mostly due to
the insurance company being closed and the police could not talk to anyone
even when I had my policy on me at all times to prove I did in fact have
insurance. I made many calls to the police, Broadsure Direct, KGM and the
people who run the MID database, but the issue did not go away and my
vehicles still did not show up on the MID database. There was also a time in
Nov 2013 when my van was sized this was due to KGM telling the police
I was not insured due to the police telling KGM that I had tools in my van.
Which was a lie by the police as I did not have anything in my van. Kelly
Tiller from the trade section was dealing with this and a few days later I
got a letter from KGM saying they was going to cancel my policy. As you can
understand I was very upset over this as I had done nothing wrong. At this
time lots of calls was both made to KMG and Broadsure to stop the cancelation
of my insurance policy, I spoke to Kelly Tiller many times, but she believed the
police and I had no say in the matter. The police were off duty so I could
not speak to them and Kelly Tiller was saying unless I could prove I did not
have any tools in my van then the insurance policy would be cancelled which
was very unfair as I had done nothing wrong, I knew I never had any tools.
But I also asked Kelly Tiller did the police tell her what tools was meant to
be in my van, to which she said no. KGM was not even aware I had mechanics
trade on my policy so if my mechanics tools had been in my van at the time my
insurance would still have been cancelled which to me what was the point in
having insurance? I then spoke to a
wonderful operator at the police when I called told her what had gone on and
was told by her to go to the police compound as when any vehicles are taken
there, they have to do a full list of items that are in the vehicles as they
are in fact legible if something goes missing. Over that weekend I sent
emails to the compound and forwarded them to Broadsure as my insurance was
due to be cancelled on the Monday. On Monday I got an email from Broadsure
direct asking me to go to the compound as Kelly Tiller had no luck getting a
reply from them also, and once there to call Kelly Tiller due to the time on
the Monday I got the email it would have been too late to go the compound and
get a call to Kelly Tiller as she would have ended work for that day so I
sent an email saying I would be going there early the next morning. I went
the next day and asked to speak to the manager of the compound who in fact
looked up my van and said nothing was in there, there was not tools I called
Kelly Tiller and the manager of the compound spoke to her and confirmed there
was nothing in the van when it was taken there by police and that I had put
thing in the van when I had taken it out of the compound. At this point Kelly
tiller believed me and said the policy would not be cancelled. But on my way
back from the compound driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and
it was Broadsure direct saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was
very upset at this and told them what had happened, I was asked to hold on
they was called KGM back and would call me right back. I waited till
Broadsure direct called me back and confirmed my insurance policy had not
been cancelled then 1260, drove home. From this
point I have been asking for all information and putting data protection acts
in which have not been dealt with and I have heard nothing from KGM. I have
been back and forward to court due to no insurance and in fact 4 cases I did
not get any summons so was in fact found guilty as I did not know it was even
going to court. I have had points put on my driving licence for no reason and
had to go back and forward to court many times when this should not have been
the case. Then the case come up for the seizer when the police said I had
tools in my van I went to court with all my documents but due to not having
the information I had asked for from KGM many times about that case I was
found guilty. I am very upset about the whole policy with KGM. I have put an
appeal in, and this case will be going to crown court I have again asked for
information and again heard nothing. These matters need to be addressed as I
am suffering due to all of this. Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows
everything that has gone on as he was my main contact. I also have all the
emails the last one that I will enclose again, which I have heard nothing
about and the 1st Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998
that I sent on the 26/11/2013. I did in fact send the Subject access
request under the Data Protection Act 1998 about time times and asked Martin
Jenkins to look into why I had heard nothing about more than once. Once I get
the appeal date for crown court, I will ask the court to summon the people at
KGM to deal with this matter as they know I was insurance and did nothing
wrong and the police lied. All I have asked for is the data so there will be
no need to summons people this way I can send the section 9 witness
statements over to the crown and the other information and this case should
be dropped against me. It just seemed that KGM does not want to do anything
and give me the information I need to prove in fact I was insurance and the
police lied to KGM to in fact make it that I was not insurance. There is a
lot more I could say about the insurance I had with KGM, but this insurance
policy was my worst nightmare. It has messed my clean driving licence up and
in fact got to the point I could not drive so could not work. Due to the
fact, KGM could not send me the information over that was needed to prove I
did have insurance. If you need o can send over all the emails that has been
sent back and forward to Broadsure who sent them to KGM. I have lost a lot of
money, and time due to this insurance policy I have had to pay for my
vehicles to be taken out of the police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost
of £180.00 to £200.00 a time. All the loss of work due to having to take time
to go to the police compound, and all the times I have had to go to court for
no insurance when in fact I had insurance. And points put on my driving
licence to the fact I could not drive, this has all been costs to myself. My
Mother Lorraine Cordell has also written many of the emails and is fine with
dealing with this issue. Regards 1261, Simon Cordell Confidentiality Caution The information in this
email and in any attachments is
CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this
message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content
of emails sent and received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use or
other lawful business purposes. Email sent for and on behalf of a member of
Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK
Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents
Limited | registered number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius
Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed representative
of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited
| registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a
brand name for business written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 417. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ MT3574694_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1262,1263,1264,1265,1266, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22 To: 'Austin, Andrew' Cc: 'complaints@lloyds.com' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Andrew Ø
I will
forward this to you within a few days I will ask the police compound to do a
full print out as to all the tickets as I believe there is a few missing. Ø
I do
have around 6 of the tickets here when the vehicles were sized, I also do
have court letters, and letters from DVLA, which I will forward over to you
once I have scanned then in so please give me a few days and I will get back
to you with this information as there is a lot of data. Ø
The
main one at this time I am worried about is the case where the vehicle was
sized due to the police lying and me being found guilty at court you did have
an email on the 30 November 2014 about what was needed and I do have
the court letter showing I was found guilty and about the appeal. Ø
This
data should have been given under the Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998 I put in, so was wondering what you can do about this and
if you will need a new Subj etc. Ø
access
request under the Data Protection Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in so to do
a 4th I do not feel I should need to do. Ø
KGM
have in fact did not follow the protocol for the Subject access request under
the Data Protection Act 1998 which has been put in 3 times already to KGM, I
will be addressing this with the Information Commissioner’s Office as I do
not see any reason you would have to stop the information, Ø
I
have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact guilty of no
insurance. Ø
And
now say to deal with this you need information from me. Ø
I
can understand you want the information for the complaint that has been put
in, but not the information I asked for to show I was in fact I was insured
for an appeal that is ongoing. Ø
And
in fact, would not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under the
Data Protection Act 1998 as I would not have been found guilty. Ø
I
would like the data sent to the court as soon as possible in regard to this
so they can look at the facts and see if fact I was insured so there should
be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more of my time wasted going to
court. Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew [Mail To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell Thank you for your email. My letter dated 22/12/14 requests
the following documentary evidence from you with regards to any losses that
may have been incurred as a result of the above, I confirm as detailed in my
previous letter, I require the following: 1263,
Following our initial
investigations, we note that you submitted a subject access request to your
Broker. Should you wish to proceed with this, please can you formally request
this in writing to our Data Protection Officer at the address detailed at the
foot of the letter including a cheque payable to KGM Insurance for the sum of
£10.00. Alternatively, you may wish to wait until our full investigations
have been finalised. Can you please confirm how you wish to proceed with that
request? Should you not be in receipt of any of the letters I refer to above,
please advise me and I will ensure copies are sent to you immediately. I await your reply Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM
Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing due to the
complaint I put in. I have forwarded emails to Broadsure Direct and spoken to
Broadsure Direct who took the policy of insurance out policy no: MT3574694 I
have been asking for information from KGM since 2013 and have heard
nothing back. When the policy was taken out there was some reason it did not
show up on the MID database Broadsure Direct and KGM was aware of this. Due
to this fact I had my vehicles were sized a number of times I believe 8 or 9
times in all, where I had to pay the costs to get my vehicles out the
compound each time. In the week when I was pulled by police it was not so bad
as the insurance company was opened so when I showed the police my policy,
they could call the insurance company. 1264, The seizers happened mostly
at the weekend mostly due to the insurance company being closed and the
police could not talk to anyone even when I had my policy on me at all times
to prove I did in fact have insurance. I made many calls to the police,
Broadsure Direct, KGM and the people who run the MID database, but the issue
did not go away and my vehicles still did not show up on the MID database.
There was also a time in Nov 2013 when my van was sized this was due
to KGM telling the police I was not insured due to the police telling KGM
that I had tools in my van. Which was a lie by the police as I did not have
anything in my van. Kelly Tiller from the trade section was dealing with this
and a few days later I got a letter from KGM saying they was going to cancel
my policy. As you can understand I was very upset over this as I had done
nothing wrong. At this time lots of calls was both made to KMG and Broadsure
to stop the cancelation of my insurance policy, I spoke to Kelly Tiller many
times, but she believed the police and I had no say in the matter. The police
were off duty so I could not speak to them and Kelly Tiller was saying unless
I could prove I did not have any tools in my van then the insurance policy
would be cancelled which was very unfair as I had done nothing wrong, I knew
I never had any tools. But I also asked Kelly Tiller did the police tell her
what tools was meant to be in my van, to which she said no. KGM was not even
aware I had mechanics trade on my policy so if my mechanics tools had been in
my van at the time my insurance would still have been cancelled which to me
what was the point in having insurance? I then spoke to a
wonderful operator at the police when I called told her what had gone on and
was told by her to go to the police compound as when any vehicles are taken
there, they have to do a full list of items that are in the vehicles as they
are in fact legible if something goes missing. Over that weekend I sent
emails to the compound and forwarded them to Broadsure as my insurance was
due to be cancelled on the Monday. On Monday I got an email from Broadsure
direct asking me to go to the compound as Kelly Tiller had no luck getting a
reply from them also, and once there to call Kelly Tiller due to the time on
the Monday I got the email it would have been too late to go the compound and
get a call to Kelly Tiller as she would have ended work for that day so I
sent an email saying I would be going there early the next morning. I went
the next day and asked to speak to the manager of the compound who in fact
looked up my van and said nothing was in there, there was not tools I called
Kelly Tiller and the manager of the compound spoke to her and confirmed there
was nothing in the van when it was taken there by police and that I had put
thing in the van when I had taken it out of the compound. At this point Kelly
tiller believed me and said the policy would not be cancelled. But on my way
back from the compound driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and
it was Broadsure direct saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was
very upset at this and told them what had happened, I was asked to hold on
they was called KGM back and would call me right back. I waited till
Broadsure direct called me back and confirmed my insurance policy had not
been cancelled then drove home. From this point I have been asking for all
information and putting data protection acts in which have not been dealt
with and I have heard nothing from KGM. I have been back and forward to court
due to no insurance and in fact 4 cases I did not get any summons so was in
fact found guilty as I did not know it was even going to court. I have had
points put on my driving licence for no reason and had to go back and forward
to court 1265, many times, when this should
not have been the case. Then the case come up for the seizer when the police
said I had tools in my van I went to court with all my documents but due to
not having the information I had asked for from KGM many times about that
case I was found guilty. I am very upset about the whole policy with KGM. I
have put an appeal in and this case will be going to crown court I have again
asked for information and again heard nothing. These matters need to be
addressed as I am suffering due to all of this. Martin Jenkins at Broadsure
Direct knows everything that has gone on as he was my main contact. I also
have all the emails the last one that I will enclose again, which I have
heard nothing about and the 1st Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the 26/11/2013. I did in fact send
the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 about time
times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into why I had heard nothing about
more than once. Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I will ask the
court to summon the people at KGM to deal with this matter as they know I was
insurance and did nothing wrong and the police lied. All I have asked for is
the data so there will be no need to summons people this way I can send the section
9 witness statements over to the crown and the other information and this
case should be dropped against me. It just seemed that KGM does not want to
do anything and give me the information I need to prove in fact I was
insurance and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it that I was not
insurance. There is a lot more I could say about the insurance I had with
KGM, but this insurance policy was my worst nightmare. It has messed my clean
driving licence up and in fact got to the point I could not drive so could
not work. Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the information over that
was needed to prove I did have insurance. If you need o can send over all the
emails that has been sent back and forward to Broadsure who sent them to KGM.
I have lost a lot of money, and time due to this insurance policy I have had
to pay for my vehicles to be taken out of the police compound around 8 to 9
times at a cost of £180.00 to £200.00 a time. All the loss of work due to
having to take time to go to the police compound, and all the times I have
had to go to court for no insurance when in fact I had insurance. And points
put on my driving licence to the fact I could not drive, this has all been
costs to myself. My Mother Lorraine Cordell has also written many of the
emails and is fine with dealing with this issue. Regards Simon Cordell 1266, Confidentiality Caution The information in this
email and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy this message and notify the sender immediately.
Canopius may monitor the content of emails sent and received via its network
for viruses, unauthorised use or other lawful business purposes. Email sent
for and on behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius
Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents
Limited | registered number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential
Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the
Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered
number 02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents
Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor
Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius Managing Agents
Limited Registered office: Gallery
9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 418. Austin, Andrew _RE_ MT3574694_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1267,1268,1269,1270, From: Austin, Andrew [Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 16:13 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, Ø I have detailed the process
for requesting information under the subject access request and if you wish
to proceed with this please confirm. Ø In the meantime, I am
keen to assist you if I can in confirming when cover was in force. Ø Please can you confirm if
there is a contact number, I can call you or your Mother on and a time that
is acceptable so that I can try and help resolve this particular issue for
you. Ø I look forward to
hearing from you with this information. Regards, Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting
Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of the UK
Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 |
M 07469 147743 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Andrew Ø
I
will forward this to you within a few days I will ask the police compound to
do a full print out as to all the tickets as I believe there is a few missing. Ø
I do
have around 6 of the tickets here when the vehicles were sized, I also do
have court letters, and letters from DVLA, which I will forward over to you
once I have scanned then in so please give me a few days and I will get back
to you with this information as there is a lot of data. Ø
The
main one at this time I am worried about is the case where the vehicle was
sized due to the police lying and me being found guilty at court you did have
an email on the 30 November 2014 about what was needed and I do have
the court letter showing I was found guilty and about the appeal. Ø
This
data should have been given under the Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998 I put in, so was wondering what you can do about this and
if you will need a new Subj etc. Ø
access
request under the Data Protection Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in so to do
a 4th I do not feel I should need to do. Ø
KGM
have in fact did not follow the protocol for the Subject access request under
the Data Protection Act 1998 which has been put in 3 times already to KGM, I
will be addressing this with the Information Commissioner’s Office as I do
not see any reason you would have to stop the information, Ø
I
have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact guilty of no
insurance. Ø
And
now say to deal with this you need information from me. Ø
I
can understand you want the information for the complaint that has been put
in, but not the information I asked for to show I was in fact I was insured
for an appeal that is ongoing. Ø
And
in fact, would not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under the
Data Protection Act 1998 as I would not have been found guilty. Ø
I would
like the data sent to the court as soon as possible in regard to this so they
can look at the facts and see if fact I was insured so there should be no
need for the appeal to go ahead with more of my time wasted going to court. Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew [Mail To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell Thank you for your email. 1268, My letter dated 22/12/14
requests the following documentary evidence from you with regards to any
losses that may have been incurred as a result of the above, I confirm as
detailed in my previous letter, I require the following:
Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting
Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of the UK
Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing due to the
complaint I put in. I have forwarded emails to Broadsure Direct and spoken to
Broadsure Direct who took the policy of insurance out policy no: MT3574694 I
have been asking for information from KGM since 2013 and have heard
nothing back. When the policy was taken out there was some reason it did not
show up on the MID database Broadsure Direct and KGM was aware of this. Due
to this fact I had my vehicles were sized a number of times I believe 8 or 9
times in all, where I had to pay the costs to get my vehicles out the
compound each time. In the week when I was pulled by police it was not so bad
as the insurance company was opened so when I showed the police my policy,
they could call the insurance company. The seizers happened mostly at the
weekend mostly due to the insurance company being closed and the police could
not talk to anyone even when I had my policy on me at all times to prove I
did in fact have insurance. I made many calls to the police, Broadsure
Direct, KGM and the people who run the MID database, but the issue did not go
away and my vehicles still did not show up on the MID database. There was
also a time in Nov 2013 when my van was sized this was due to KGM
telling the police I was not insured due to the police telling KGM that I had
tools in my van. Which was a lie by the police as I did not have anything in
my van. Kelly Tiller from the trade section was dealing with this and a few
days later I got a letter from KGM saying they was going to cancel my policy.
As you can understand I was very upset over this as I had done nothing wrong.
At these times lots of calls was both made to KMG and Broadsure to stop the
cancelation of my insurance policy, I spoke to Kelly Tiller many times, but
she believed the police and I had no say in the matter. The police were off
duty so I could not speak to them and Kelly Tiller was saying unless I could
prove I did not have any tools in my van then the insurance policy would be
cancelled which was very unfair as I had done nothing wrong, I knew I never
had any tools. But I also asked Kelly Tiller did the police tell her what
tools was meant to be in my van, to which she 1269, said no. KGM was not even
aware I had mechanics trade on my policy so if my mechanics tools had been in
my van at the time my insurance would still have been cancelled which to me
what was the point in having insurance? I then spoke to a
wonderful operator at the police when I called told her what had gone on and
was told by her to go to the police compound as when any vehicles are taken
there, they have to do a full list of items that are in the vehicles as they
are in fact legible if something goes missing. Over that weekend I sent
emails to the compound and forwarded them to Broadsure as my insurance was due
to be cancelled on the Monday. On Monday I got an email from Broadsure direct
asking me to go to the compound as Kelly Tiller had no luck getting a reply
from them also, and once there to call Kelly Tiller due to the time on the
Monday I got the email it would have been too late to go the compound and get
a call to Kelly Tiller as she would have ended work for that day so I sent an
email saying I would be going there early the next morning. I went the next
day and asked to speak to the manager of the compound who in fact looked up
my van and said nothing was in there, there was not tools I called Kelly
Tiller and the manager of the compound spoke to her and confirmed there was
nothing in the van when it was taken there by police and that I had put thing
in the van when I had taken it out of the compound. At this point Kelly
tiller believed me and said the policy would not be cancelled. But on my way
back from the compound driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and
it was Broadsure direct saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was
very upset at this and told them what had happened, I was asked to hold on
they was called KGM back and would call me right back. I waited till
Broadsure direct called me back and confirmed my insurance policy had not
been cancelled then drove home. From this point I have been asking for all
information and putting data protection acts in which have not been dealt
with and I have heard nothing from KGM. I have been back and forward to court
due to no insurance and in fact 4 cases I did not get any summons so was in
fact found guilty as I did not know it was even going to court. I have had
points put on my driving licence for no reason and had to go back and forward
to court many times when this should not have been the case. Then the case
come up for the seizer when the police said I had tools in my van I went to
court with all my documents but due to not having the information I had asked
for from KGM many times about that case I was found guilty. I am very upset about
the whole policy with KGM. I have put an appeal in, and this case will be
going to crown court I have again asked for information and again heard
nothing. These matters need to be addressed as I am suffering due to all of
this. Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows everything that has gone on as
he was my main contact. I also have all the emails the last one that I will
enclose again, which I have heard nothing about and the 1st Subject access
request under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the 26/11/2013.
I did in fact send the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act
1998 about time times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into why I had heard
nothing about more than once. Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I
will ask the court to summon the people at KGM to deal with this matter as
they know I was insurance and did nothing wrong and the police lied. All I
have asked for is the data so there will be no need to summons people this
way I can send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown and the
other information and this case should be dropped against me. It just seemed
that KGM does not want to do anything and give me the information I need to
prove in fact I was insurance and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it
that I was not insurance. There is a lot more I could say about the insurance
I had with KGM, but this insurance policy was my worst nightmare. It has
messed my clean driving licence up and in fact got to the point I could not
drive so could not work. Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the
information over that was needed to prove I did have insurance. If you need o
can send over all the emails that has been sent back and forward to Broadsure
who sent them to KGM. I have lost a lot of money, and time due to this
insurance policy I have had to pay for my vehicles to be taken out of the
police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost of £180.00 to £200.00 a time.
All the loss of work due to having to take time to go to the police compound,
and all the times I have had 1270, to go to court for no
insurance when in fact I had insurance. And points put on my driving licence
to the fact I could not drive, this has all been costs to myself. My Mother Lorraine Cordell has also written
many of the emails and is fine with dealing with this issue. Regards Simon Cordell Confidentiality Caution
The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you
are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify the
sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius
Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited |
registered number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation
Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential
Regulation Authority Canopius
Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed representative
of Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for
business written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London,
EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales
Confidentiality Caution The
information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are
not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify the sender
immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and received
via its network for viruses, unauthorised use or other lawful business
purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which
includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited
| registered number 04818520 Canopius
Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 | Authorised by the
Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered
number 02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents
Limited Canopius Services Limited |
registered number 02733994 KGM Motor
Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius Managing Agents
Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA |
Registered in England and Wales 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 419. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ MT3574694 / Page Numbers: 1271,1272,1273,1274,1275,1276,1277, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 22:51 To: 'Austin, Andrew' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Attachments: S Cordell Cert. KGM_20132014_Colour.pdf Information we need.pdf Dear Andrew Please see attached
Insurance, which will show you full details of his insurance policy and dates
covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can be sorted out by
the court and I can send the information over to the CPS for the case of the
14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools in my van to
void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and Jessica know fully
what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call from the police
officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my policy
and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and she was the one
that believed the police until I went to the police compound and spoke to the
manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not done this Kelly
Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have all the emails
to prove this. After Kelly Tiller found out I was not lying about having no
tools in my van the insurance policy was kept in place, I did ask Kelly
Tiller on more than once to send me the information and put data requests in
which was not replied to. Now I have been found guilty when Kelly Tiller
knows the truth that there was not tools and the police officer lied to KGM
on the phone call. I am the one that has suffered over all this not just on
this case but all the times I have been taken to court for no insurance over
the year my policy run with KGM due to it not showing on the MID database.
You should have all the emails already from Broadsure Direct and many was
sent by them to KGM as I was told KGM could not talk to me and I had to deal
with Broadsure Direct about my policy Martin Jenkins from Broadsure Direct
should also have copies of all emails as I do. I have spoken to DVLA today
and asked for the data of how many times points was put on my licence due to
not getting summons from police and then dealing with cases I knew nothing
about and then I had to get the cases reopened, I have to write them a letter
and they will send the data I have asked for in the post. I do have a lot of
letters which I will sort out scan and send over. But the 1st part I want to
deal with is the court case I was found guilty at and have put an appeal in
that is the most important to me right now. We can deal with everything else
once I get all the data scanned as there is really a lot and it was all due
to KGM not sorting out why my insurance was not showing on the MID database.
The seizers alone have left me out of pocket by around £1700.00. That is without
all the days I have not been able to work due to my driving licence being
messed up and showing points for no insurance. All the time going back and
forward to the compound to collect my vehicles, and everything else I have
had to deal with the courts when in fact I had done nothing wrong. I have
tried to deal with this for months and months without going to the ombudsman
and KGM has taken no notice, it has taken me to go to the ombudsman for KGM
to take any notice and I don’t feel anyone would be happy with this sort of
service from KGM let alone any company doing this and causing someone so much
suffering. 1272, It was one of the police
in the end at the compound who in the end worked out why it was not showing
up on the MID and that was because there had been a space put within my Reg
Numbers. It was that bad two police compounds new me and said each time not
again. As you can see, I am not very happy about all of this but I do not
think anyone would be when they paid for their insurance and had done nothing
wrong to suffer all this. Therefore, could you please get the information I
need to send to the CPS, I have written what was needed from Nov 2014
and way before this, and it still has not been sent and I have this hanging
over my head. I did not just get points on my licence I got disqualified from
driving for 6 months due to repeat offending of no insurance please tell me
why when I have paid for my insurance from KGM? The reason it has not been
enforced is due to me putting an appeal in. You can contact my mother on 0208
245 7454 or 07961 833021 Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew [Mail To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 16:13 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, I have detailed the process
for requesting information under the subject access request and if you wish
to proceed with this please confirm. In the meantime, I am keen to assist you
if I can in confirming when cover was in force. Please can you confirm if
there is a contact number, I can call you or your Mother on and a time that
is acceptable so that I can try and help resolve this particular issue for
you. I look forward to hearing from you with this information. Regards, Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting
Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of the UK
Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 |
M 07469 147743 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Andrew 1273, I will forward this to you
within a few days I will ask the police compound to do a full print out as to
all the tickets as I believe there is a few missing. I do have around 6 of
the tickets here when the vehicles were sized, I also do have court letters,
and letters from DVLA, which I will forward over to you once I have scanned
then in so please give me a few days and I will get back to you with this
information as there is a lot of data. The main one at this time I am worried
about is the case where the vehicle was sized due to the police lying and me
being found guilty at court you did have an email on the 30 November 2014
about what was needed and I do have the court letter showing I was found
guilty and about the appeal. This data should have been given under the
Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 I put in, so was
wondering what you can do about this and if you will need a new Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in
so to do a 4th I do not feel I should need to do. KGM have in fact not
followed the protocol for the Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998 which has been put in 3 times already to KGM, I will be
addressing this with the Information Commissioner’s Office as I do not see
any reason you would have to stop the information, I have asked for under
this act to prove I was not in fact guilty of no insurance. And now say to
deal with this you need information from me. I can understand you want the
information for the complaint that has been put in, but not the information I
asked for to show I was in fact I was insured for an appeal that is ongoing.
And in fact, would not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under
the Data Protection Act 1998 as I would not have been found guilty. I would
like the data sent to the court as soon as possible in regards to this so
they can look at the facts and see if fact I was insured so there should be
no need for the appeal to go ahead with more of my time wasted going to
court. Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew [Mail To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell Thank you for your email. My letter dated 22/12/2014 requests the following
documentary evidence from you with regards to any losses that may have been
incurred as a result of the above, I confirm as detailed in my previous
letter, I require the following: 1. Confirmation of the points you raised to the Financial Ombudsman when
you verbally submitted your complaint and the outcome you are looking to
achieve. 2. Full details of the losses that you have incurred as a direct result
of your complaint and full documentary evidence supporting this. 3. Confirmation of dates of any convictions or costs imposed directly as
a result of your complaint, including full documentary evidence supporting
this. 1274, Once I receive all of the
above, I will be happy to consider this further. With regards to your
subject access request. My letter of the 9/12/14 advised the following:
Following our initial investigations we note that you submitted a subject
access request to your Broker. Should you wish to proceed with this, please
can you formally request this in writing to our Data Protection Officer at
the address detailed at the foot of the letter including a cheque payable to
KGM Insurance for the sum of £10.00. Alternatively, you may wish to wait
until our full investigations have been finalised. Can you please confirm how
you wish to proceed with that request? Should you not be in receipt of any of
the letters I refer to above, please advise me and I will ensure copies are
sent to you immediately. I await your reply Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations
Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of the UK
Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing due to the
complaint I put in. I have forwarded emails to Broadsure Direct and spoken to
Broadsure Direct who took the policy of insurance out policy no: MT3574694 I
have been asking for information from KGM since 2013 and have heard
nothing back. When the policy was taken out there was some reason it did not
show up on the MID database Broadsure Direct and KGM was aware of this. Due
to this fact I had my vehicles were sized a number of times I believe 8 or 9
times in all, where I had to pay the costs to get my vehicles out the
compound each time. In the week when I was pulled by police it was not so bad
as the insurance company was opened so when I showed the police my policy,
they could call the insurance company. The seizers happened mostly at the weekend
mostly due to the insurance company being closed and the police could not
talk to anyone even when I had my policy on me at all times to prove I did in
fact have insurance. I made many calls to the police, Broadsure Direct, KGM
and the people who run the MID database but the issue did not go away and my
vehicles still did not show up on the MID database. There was also a time in
Nov 2013 when my van was sized this was due to KGM telling the police
I was not insured due to the police telling KGM that I had tools in my van.
Which was a lie by the police as I did not have anything in my van. Kelly
Tiller from the trade section was dealing with this and a few days later I
got a letter from KGM saying they was going to cancel my policy. As you can 1275, understand I was very
upset over this as I had done nothing wrong. At this time lots of calls was
both made to KMG and Broadsure to stop the cancelation of my insurance
policy, I spoke to Kelly Tiller many times, but she believed the police and I
had no say in the matter. The police were off duty so I could not speak to
them and Kelly Tiller was saying unless I could prove I did not have any
tools in my van then the insurance policy would be cancelled which was very
unfair as I had done nothing wrong, I knew I never had any tools. But I also
asked Kelly Tiller did the police tell her what tools was meant to be in my
van, to which she said no. KGM was not even aware I had mechanics trade on my
policy so if my mechanics tools had been in my van at the time my insurance
would still have been cancelled which to me what was the point in having
insurance? I then spoke to a
wonderful operator at the police when I called told her what had gone on and
was told by her to go to the police compound as when any vehicles are taken
there, they have to do a full list of items that are in the vehicles as they
are in fact legible if something goes missing. Over that weekend I sent
emails to the compound and forwarded them to Broadsure as my insurance was
due to be cancelled on the Monday. On Monday I got an email from Broadsure
direct asking me to go to the compound as Kelly Tiller had no luck getting a
reply from them also, and once there to call Kelly Tiller due to the time on
the Monday I got the email it would have been too late to go the compound and
get a call to Kelly Tiller as she would have ended work for that day so I
sent an email saying I would be going there early the next morning. I went
the next day and asked to speak to the manager of the compound who in fact looked
up my van and said nothing was in there, there was not tools I called Kelly
Tiller and the manager of the compound spoke to her and confirmed there was
nothing in the van when it was taken there by police and that I had put thing
in the van when I had taken it out of the compound. At this point Kelly
tiller believed me and said the policy would not be cancelled. But on my way
back from the compound driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and
it was Broadsure direct saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was
very upset at this and told them what had happened, I was asked to hold on
they was called KGM back and would call me right back. I waited till
Broadsure direct called me back and confirmed my insurance policy had not
been cancelled then drove home. From this point I have been asking for all
information and putting data protection acts in which have not been dealt
with and I have heard nothing from KGM. I have been back and forward to court
due to no insurance and in fact 4 cases I did not get any summons so was in
fact found guilty as I did not know it was even going to court. I have had
points put on my driving licence for no reason and had to go back and forward
to court many times when this should not have been the case. Then the case
come up for the seizer when the police said I had tools in my van I went to
court with all my documents but due to not having the information I had asked
for from KGM many times about that case I was found guilty. I am very upset
about the whole policy with KGM. I have put an appeal in and this case will
be going to crown court I have again asked for information and again heard
nothing. These matters need to be addressed as I am suffering due to all of
this. Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows everything that has gone on as
he was my main contact. I also have all the emails the last one that I will
enclose again, which I have heard nothing about and 1276, the 1st Subject access
request under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the 26/11/2013.
I did in fact send the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act
1998 about time times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into why I had heard
nothing about more than once. Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I
will ask the court to summon the people at KGM to deal with this matter as
they know I was insurance and did nothing wrong and the police lied. All I
have asked for is the data so there will be no need to summons people this
way I can send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown and the
other information and this case should be dropped against me. It just seemed
that KGM does not want to do anything and give me the information I need to
prove in fact I was insurance and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it
that I was not insurance. There is a lot more I could say about the insurance
I had with KGM, but this insurance policy was my worst nightmare. It has
messed my clean driving licence up and in fact got to the point I could not
drive so could not work. Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the
information over that was needed to prove I did have insurance. If you need o
can send over all the emails that has been sent back and forward to Broadsure
who sent them to KGM. I have lost a lot of money, and time due to this insurance
policy I have had to pay for my vehicles to be taken out of the police
compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost of £180.00 to £200.00 a time. All the
loss of work due to having to take time to go to the police compound, and all
the times I have had to go to court for no insurance when in fact I had
insurance. And points put on my driving licence to the fact I could not
drive, this has all been costs to myself. My Mother Lorraine Cordell has also
written many of the emails and is fine with dealing with this issue. Regards Simon Cordell 1277, Confidentiality Caution The information in this
e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy this message and notify the sender immediately.
Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and received via its network
for viruses, unauthorised use or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent
for and on behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered
number 04818520 Canopius Managing
Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential
Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the
Prudential Regulation Authority
Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered
number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is
a brand name for business written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Registered office: Gallery 9, One
Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered
number 04818520 Canopius Managing
Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential
Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the
Prudential Regulation Authority
Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered
number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is
a brand name for business written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Registered office: Gallery 9, One
Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales 7 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 420. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ MT3574694 / Page Numbers: 1278,1279,1280,1281,1282,1283,1284, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 22:53 To: 'Andrew.Austin@canopius.com' Cc: 'complaints@lloyds.com' Subject:
FW: MT3574694 Attachments: S Cordell Cert. KGM_20132014_Colour.pdf; Information we need.pdf Dear Andrew Please see attached
Insurance, which will show you full details of his insurance policy and dates
covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can be sorted out by
the court and I can send the information over to the CPS for the case of the
14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools in my van to
void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and Jessica know fully
what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call from the police
officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my policy
and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and she was the one
that believed the police until I went to the police compound and spoke to the
manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not done this Kelly
Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have all the emails
to prove this. After Kelly Tiller found out I was not lying about having no
tools in my van the insurance policy was kept in place, I did ask Kelly
Tiller on more than once to send me the information and put data requests in
which was not replied to. Now I have been found guilty when Kelly Tiller
knows the truth that there was not tools and the police officer lied to KGM
on the phone call. I am the one that has suffered over all this not just on
this case but all the times I have been taken to court for no insurance over
the year my policy run with KGM due to it not showing on the MID database.
You should have all the emails already from Broadsure Direct and many was
sent by them to KGM as I was told KGM could not talk to me and I had to deal
with Broadsure Direct about my policy Martin Jenkins from Broadsure Direct
should also have copies of all emails as I do. I have spoken to DVLA today
and asked for the data of how many times points was put on my licence due to
not getting summons from police and then dealing with cases I knew nothing
about and then I had to get the cases reopened, I have to write them a letter
and they will send the data I have asked for in the post. I do have a lot of
letters which I will sort out scan and send over. But the 1st part I want to
deal with is the court case I was found guilty at and have put an appeal in
that is the most important to me right now. We can deal with everything else
once I get all the data scanned as there is really a lot and it was all due
to KGM not sorting out why my insurance was not showing on the MID database.
The seizers alone have left me out of pocket by around £1700.00. That is without
all the days I have not been able to work due to my driving licence being
messed up and showing points for no insurance. All the time going back and
forward to the compound to collect my vehicles, and everything else I have
had to deal with the courts when in fact I had done nothing wrong. I have
tried to deal with this for months and months without going to the ombudsman
and KGM has taken no notice, it has taken me to go to the ombudsman for KGM
to take any notice and I don’t feel anyone would be happy with this sort of
service from KGM let alone any company doing this and 1279, causing someone so much suffering.
It was one of the police in the end at the compound who in the end worked out
why it was not showing up on the MID and that was because there had been a
space put within my Reg Numbers. It was that bad two police compounds new me
and said each time not again. As you can see, I am not very happy about all
of this but I do not think anyone would be when they paid for their insurance
and had done nothing wrong to suffer all this. Therefore, could you please
get the information I need to send to the CPS, I have written what was needed
from Nov 2014 and way before this, and it still has not been sent and
I have this hanging over my head. I did not just get points on my licence I
got disqualified from driving for 6 months due to repeat offending of no insurance
please tell me why when I have paid for my insurance from KGM? The reason it
has not been enforced is due to me putting an appeal in. You can contact my
mother on 0208 245 7454 or 07961 833021 Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew [Mail To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 16:13 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, I have detailed the
process for requesting information under the subject access request and if
you wish to proceed with this please confirm. In the meantime, I am keen to
assist you if I can in confirming when cover was in force. Please can you
confirm if there is a contact number, I can call you or your Mother on and a
time that is acceptable so that I can try and help resolve this particular
issue for you. I look forward to hearing
from you with this information. Regards, Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting
Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of the UK
Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 |
M 07469 147743 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Andrew 1280,1281,1282,1283,1284, 43. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 43 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_01.21.2015_RE MT3574694 21/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 298,299,300 301,302,303,304,305,306 307,308 -- 298, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 21 January 2015 22:51 To: 'Austin, Andrew' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Attachments: S Cordell Cert._ KGM_
2013-2014_Colour.pdf Information we need.pdf Dear Andrew Please see attached Insurance, which will show
you full details of his insurance policy and dates covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can
be sorted out by the court and I can send the information over to the CPS for
the case of the 14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools in
my van to void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and Jessica
know fully what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call from the
police officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my
policy and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and she was the
one that believed the police until I went to the police compound and spoke to
the manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not done this
Kelly Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have all the
emails to prove this. After Kelly Tiller found out I was not lying
about having no tools in my van the insurance policy was kept in place, I did
ask Kelly Tiller on more than once to send me the information and put data
requests in which was not replied to. Now I have been found guilty when Kelly
Tiller knows the truth that there was not tools and the police officer lied
to KGM on the phone call. I am the one that has suffered over all this not
just on this case but all the times I have been taken to court for no
insurance over the year my policy run with KGM due to it not showing on the
MID database. You should have all the emails already from
Broadsure Direct and many was sent by them to KGM as I was told KGM could not
talk to me and I had to deal with Broadsure Direct about my policy Martin
Jenkins from Broadsure Direct should also have copies of all emails as I do. I have spoken to DVLA today and asked for the
data of how many times points was put on my licence due to not getting
summons from police and then dealing with cases I knew nothing about and then
I had to get the cases reopened, I have to write them a letter and they will
send the data I have asked for in the post. I do have a lot of letters which I will sort out
scan and send over. But the 1st part I want to deal with is the court case I
was found guilty at and have put an appeal in that is the most important to
me right now. We can deal with everything else once I get all
the data scanned as there is really a lot and it was all due to KGM not
sorting out why my insurance was not showing on the MID database. The seizers
alone have left me out of pocket by around £1700.00. That is without all the
days I have not been able to work due to my driving licence being messed up
and showing points for no insurance. All the time going back and forward to
the compound to collect my vehicles, and everything else I have had to deal
with the courts when in fact I had done nothing wrong. I have tried to deal with this for months and
months without going to the ombudsman and KGM has taken no notice, it has
taken me to go to the ombudsman for KGM to take any notice and I don’t feel
anyone would be happy with this sort of service from KGM let alone any
company doing this and causing someone so much suffering. It was one of the police in the end at the
compound who in the end worked out why it was not showing up on the MID and
that was because there had been a space put within my Reg Numbers. It was
that bad two police compounds new me and said each time not again. 299, As you can see, I am not very happy about all of
this, but I do not think anyone would be when they paid for their insurance
and had done nothing wrong to suffer all this. Therefore, could you please get the information I
need to send to the CPS; I have written what was needed from Nov 2014 and way
before this, and it still has not been sent and I have this hanging over my
head. I did not just get points on my licence I got disqualified from driving
for 6 months due to repeat offending of no insurance please tell me why when
I have paid for my insurance from KGM? The reason it has not been enforced is
due to me putting an appeal in. You can contact my mother on Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 16:13 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, I have detailed the process for requesting information under the
subject access request and if you wish to proceed with this please confirm. In the meantime, I am keen to assist you if I can in confirming when
cover was in force. Please can you confirm if there is a contact number, I can call you or
your Mother on and a time that is acceptable so that I can try and help
resolve this particular issue for you. I look forward to hearing from you with this information. Regards, Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of
the UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close |
London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 | M 07469
147743 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Andrew I will forward this to you within a few days I
will ask the police compound to do a full print out as to all the tickets as
I believe there is a few missing. I do have around 6 of the tickets here when the
vehicles were sized, I also do have court letters, and letters from DVLA,
which I will forward over to you once I have scanned then in so please give
me a few days and I will get back to you with this information as there is a
lot of data. The main one at this time I am worried about is
the case where the vehicle was sized due to the police lying and me being
found guilty at court you 300, did have an email on the 30 November 2014 about
what was needed, and I do have the court letter showing I was found guilty
and about the appeal. This data should have been given under the
Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 I put in, so was
wondering what you can do about this and if you will need a new Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in
so to do a 4th I do not feel I should need to do. KGM have in fact did not follow the protocol for
the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 which has been
put in 3 times already to KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information
Commissioner’s Office as I do not see any reason you would have to stop the
information, I have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact
guilty of no insurance. And now say to deal with this you need
information from me. I can understand you want the information for the
complaint that has been put in, but not the information I asked for to show I
was in fact I was insured for an appeal that is ongoing. And in fact, would
not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under the Data Protection
Act 1998 as I would not have been found guilty. I would like the data sent to the court as soon
as possible in regard to this so they can look at the facts and see if fact I
was insured so there should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more
of my time wasted going to court. Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell Thank you for your email. My letter dated 22/12/14 requests the following
documentary evidence from you With regards to any losses that may have been
incurred as a result of the above, I confirm as detailed in my previous
letter, I require the following: - · Confirmation of the points you raised to the
Financial Ombudsman when you verbally submitted your complaint and the
outcome you are looking to achieve. · Full details of the losses that you have incurred
as a direct result of your complaint and full documentary evidence supporting
this. · Confirmation of dates of any convictions or costs
imposed directly as a result of your complaint, including full documentary
evidence supporting this. Once I receive all of the above, I will be happy
to consider this further. With regards to your subject access request. My
letter of the 9/12/14 advised the following: - Following our initial investigations, we note
that you submitted a subject access request to your Broker. Should you wish
to proceed with this, please can you formally request this in writing to our
Data Protection Officer at the address detailed at the foot of the letter
including a cheque payable to KGM Insurance for the sum of £10.00.
Alternatively, you may wish to wait until our full investigations have been
finalised. 301, Can you please confirm how you wish to proceed
with that request? Should you not be in receipt of any of the letters I refer to advise
me above, please and I will ensure copies are sent to you immediately. I await your reply Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of
the UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close |
London | E18 1RZ From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing due to the complaint I put in. I
have forwarded emails to Broadsure Direct and spoken to Broadsure Direct who
took the policy of insurance out policy no: MT3574694 I have been asking for information from KGM since
2013 and have heard nothing back. When the policy was taken out there was some
reason it did not show up on the MID database Broadsure Direct and KGM was
aware of this. Due to this fact I had my vehicles were sized a
number of times I believe 8 or 9 times in all, where I had to pay the costs
to get my vehicles out the compound each time. In the week when I was pulled
by police it was not so bad as the insurance company was opened so when I
showed the police my policy, they could call the insurance company. The seizers happened mostly at the weekend mostly
due to the insurance company being closed and the police could not talk to
anyone even when I had my policy on me at all times to prove I did in fact
have insurance. I made many calls to the police, Broadsure
Direct, KGM and the people who run the MID database, but the issue did not go
away, and my vehicles still did not show up on the MID database. There was also a time in Nov 2013 when my van was
sized this was due to KGM telling the police I was not insured due to the
police telling KGM that I had tools in my van. Which was a lie by the police
as I did not have anything in my van. Kelly Tiller from the trade section was
dealing with this and a few days later I got a letter from KGM saying they
was going to cancel my policy. As you can understand I was very upset over
this as I had done nothing wrong. At this time lots of calls was both made to KMG
and Broadsure to stop the cancelation of my insurance policy, I spoke to
Kelly Tiller many times, but she believed the police and I had no say in the
matter. The police were off duty so I could not speak to them and Kelly
Tiller was saying unless I could prove I did not have any tools in my van
then the insurance policy would be cancelled which was very unfair as I had
done nothing wrong, I knew I never had any tools. But I also asked Kelly Tiller did the police tell
her what tools was meant to be in my van, to which she said no. KGM was not
even aware I had mechanics trade on my policy so if my mechanics tools had
been in my van at the time my insurance would still have 302, been cancelled which to me What was the point in
having insurance? I then spoke to a wonderful operator at the
police when I called told her what had gone on and was told by her to go to
the police compound as when any vehicles are taken there, they have to do a
full list of items that are in the vehicles as they are in fact legible if
something goes missing. Over that weekend I sent emails to the compound and
forwarded them to Broadsure as my insurance was due to be cancelled on the
Monday. On Monday I got an email from Broadsure direct asking me to go to the
compound as Kelly Tiller had no luck getting a reply from them also, and once
there to call Kelly Tiller due to the time on the Monday I got the email it
would have been too late to go the compound and get a call to Kelly Tiller as
she would have ended work for that day so I sent an email saying I would be
going there early the next morning. I went the next day and asked to speak to the
manager of the compound who in fact looked up my van and said nothing was in
there, there was not tools I called Kelly Tiller and the manager of the
compound spoke to her and confirmed there was nothing in the van when it was
taken there by police and that I had put thing in the van when I had taken it
out of the compound. At this point Kelly tiller believed me and said
the policy would not be cancelled. But on my way back from the compound
driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and it was Broadsure direct
saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was very upset at this and told
them what had happened, I was asked to hold on they was called KGM back and
would call me right back. I waited till Broadsure direct called me back and
confirmed my insurance policy had not been cancelled then drove home. From this point I have been asking for all
information and putting data protection acts in which have not been dealt
with and I have heard nothing from KGM. I have been back and forward to court due to no
insurance and in fact 4 cases I did not get any summons so was in fact found
guilty as I did not know it was even going to court. I have had points put on my driving licence for
no reason and had to go back and forward to court many times when this should
not have been the case. Then the case come up for the seizer when the
police said I had tools in my van I went to court with all my documents but
due to not having the information I had asked for from KGM many times about
that case I was found guilty. I am very upset about the whole policy with
KGM. I have put an appeal in, and this case will be going to crown court I
have again asked for information and again heard nothing. These matters need
to be addressed as I am suffering due to all of this. Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows
everything that has gone on as he was my main contact. I also have all the emails the last one that I
will enclose again, which I have heard nothing about and the 1st Subject access
request under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the 26/11/2013. I
did in fact send the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act
1998 about time times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into why I had heard
nothing about more than once. Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I
will ask the court to summon the people at KGM to deal with this matter as
they know I was insurance and did nothing wrong and the police lied. All I
have asked for is the data so there will be no need to summons people this
way I can send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown and the
other information and this case should be dropped against me. It just seemed that KGM does not want to do
anything and give me the information I need to prove in fact I was insurance
and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it that I was not insurance. There is a lot more I could say about the
insurance I had with KGM, but this insurance policy was my worst nightmare.
It has messed my clean driving licence up and in fact got to the point I
could not drive so could not work. Due to the fact, KGM could 303, not send me the information over that was needed
to prove I did have insurance. If you need o can send over all the emails that
has been sent back and forward to Broadsure who sent them to KGM. I have lost a lot of money, and time due to this
insurance policy I have had to pay for my vehicles to be taken out of the
police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost of £180.00 to £200.00 a time.
All the loss of work due to having to take time to go to the police compound,
and all the times I have had to go to court for no insurance when in fact I
had insurance. And points put on my driving licence to the fact I could not
drive, this has all been costs to myself. My Mother Lorraine Cordell has also written many
of the emails and is fine with dealing with this issue. Regards Simon Cordell Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited 304, Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in
England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments
is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this
message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content
of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use,
or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member
of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales 305,
End of Picture! 306, RE: MT3574fpage on we
need.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 November 2014 14:47 To: ’Martin Jenkin’ Subject: RE: REF: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<80>
Open Attach Documents Hi Martin Thank you for getting back to me about this matter, and for you
contacting KGM and getting this addressed, please see the below information that
will be needed. We will also still need the section 9 witness statement from
you. The below section is what will be needed from KGM. Section 9 witness statement from: Jessica about the call that she took, from the police officer who called
KGM after Simon Cordell was stopped on the 14/11/2013. This statement will
include what was said on the phone call by the police officer and what
Jessica said to the police officer this would also include what sort of tools
the police officer said there was in the van. Any other information as to the
date of the 14/11/2013 and after this date as to any dealing Jessica had with
the stop on the 14/11/2013. Copy of all phone recordings between the police officer, and Jessica
on the date of 14/11/2013. All phone recordings of any calls that were made, to KGM from Simon
Cordell or Lorraine Cordell to try to stop his insurance policy being
cancelled and to address the stop that was made on the 14/11/2013. The phone recording of when Kelly Tiller had asked Simon Cordell to go
to the police compound and get someone from the compound to call Kelly Tiller
about the list of tools that was meant to have been in the van when the
police stopped Mr |Simon Cordell on the 14/11/2013. I believe Simon Cordell
went to the police compound on the 26/11/2013 and this is where the manager
of the compound and Simon Cordell spoke to called Kelly Tiller and confirmed
there was in fact no tools in the van. Copies of all emails that were sent from KGM to Broadsure and
Broadsure to KGM with regard to the police stop of Simon Cordell on the
14/11/2013. This would include all emails of dates after the 14/11/2014 when
Simon Cordell was trying to stop his insurance policy from being cancelled
and was trying to address this matter of what the police had said about there
being tools in his Van which was why the insurance policy was going to be
cancelled. Section 9 witness statement from: Kelly Tiller as to any dealing she had with the police stop on Simon
Cordell on the 14/11/2013. This would include all dealing with Broadsure
about this matter and any calls that was made to her by Simon Cordell and
Lorraine Cordell, and any calls Kelly Tiller made about this matter about the
cancellation of the policy and the stop by the police on the 14/11/2014 until
this issue was addressed. This would also include all details of the call that was made by the
police compound to Kelly Tiller on the 26/11/2013 to prove there were no
tools in the van. Which in turn stopped the cancelation of the insurance
policy as I believe the reason for the cancellation was due to Kelly Tiller
saying he had voided his insurance due to there being tools in the van. Full details as to why the insurance policy was going to be cancelled
and what Mr Simon Cordell was meant to have done wrong which would have in
fact made his insurance policy void. file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 307, Page 2 of 3 Full details as to why in the end the insurance policy was not cancelled
and the reasons for not cancelling which was due to Mr Simon Cordell going to
the police compound and the police compound confirming to Kelly Tiller over
the phone there was in fact no tools in the van. The reason why until Jan 2014 that Mr Simon Cordell’s insurance did
not show up on the MID database. Confirmation Simon Cordell did have insurance to drive on the
14/11/2014 and did not void his insurance in any way. Why Kelly Tiller did not deal with all the data protection requests
that had been submitted to KGM, under the data protection act 1998 subject
access request, as if this had been done Simon Cordell would not be in the
court system for this case. Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin mailto: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 28 November 2014 14:36 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: REF: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<80>
Open Attach Documents Lorraine, I have spoken to the manager at KGM and he has advised Andy Austin is
detailing with the case. They have asked for a clear email for me to send to them of your
requirements. Please could you email what is required for me to forward on! (unfortunately, Kelly is on annual leave at present) Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 Broadsure Direct - Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax
Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e-mail in file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 308, Page 3 of 3 error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the
message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor
e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 END 44. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 44 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_01.21.2015_RE MT3574694_002 21/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 309,310,311,312 313,314,315,316,317,318 -- 309, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31 To: andrew.austin@canopius.com Cc: complaints@lloyds.com Subject: RE: MT3574694 Attachments: RE_REF_00-COSX14MT07-ID_80 Open Attach Documents.pdf. RE_ Simon Cordell.pdf. Data-Protection-KGM.doc. Kelly-TiNer-KGM.doc To Whom It May Concern: I am writing due to the complaint I put in. I
have forwarded emails to Broadsure Direct and spoken to Broadsure Direct who
took the policy of insurance out policy no: MT3574694 I have been asking for information from KGM since
2013 and have heard nothing back. When the policy was taken out there was some
reason it did not show up on the MID database Broadsure Direct and KGM was
aware of this. Due to this fact I had my vehicles were sized a
number of times I believe 8 or 9 times in all, where I had to pay the costs
to get my vehicles out the compound each time. In the week when I was pulled
by police it was not so bad as the insurance company was opened so when I
showed the police my policy, they could call the insurance company. The seizers happened mostly at the weekend mostly
due to the insurance company being closed and the police could not talk to
anyone even when I had my policy on me at all times to prove I did in fact
have insurance. I made many calls to the police, Broadsure
Direct, KGM and the people who run the MID database, but the issue did not go
away, and my vehicles still did not show up on the MID database. There was also a time in Nov 2013 when my van was
sized this was due to KGM telling the police I was not insured due to the
police telling KGM that I had tools in my van. Which was a lie by the police
as I did not have anything in my van. Kelly Tiller from the trade section was
dealing with this and a few days later I got a letter from KGM saying they
was going to cancel my policy. As you can understand I was very upset over
this as I had done nothing wrong. At this time lots of calls was both made to KMG
and Broadsure to stop the cancelation of my insurance policy, I spoke to
Kelly Tiller many times, but she believed the police and I had no say in the
matter. The police were off duty so I could not speak to them and Kelly
Tiller was saying unless I could prove I did not have any tools in my van
then the insurance policy would be cancelled which was very unfair as I had
done nothing wrong, I knew I never had any tools. But I also asked Kelly Tiller did the police tell
her what tools was meant to be in my van, to which she said no. KGM was not
even aware I had mechanics trade on my policy so if my mechanics tools had
been in my van at the time my insurance would still have been cancelled which
to me what was the point in having insurance? I then spoke to a wonderful operator at the
police when I called told her what had gone on and was told by her to go to
the police compound as when any vehicles are taken there, they have to do a
full list of items that are in the vehicles as they are in fact legible if
something goes missing. Over that weekend I sent emails to the compound and
forwarded them to Broadsure as my insurance was due to be cancelled on the
Monday. On Monday I got an email from Broadsure direct asking me to go to the
compound as Kelly Tiller had no luck getting a reply from them also, and once
there to call Kelly Tiller due to the time on the Monday I got the email it
would have been too late to go the compound and get a call to Kelly Tiller as
she would have ended work for that day so I sent an email saying I would be
going there early the next morning. 310, I went the next day and asked to speak to the
manager of the compound who in fact looked up my van and said nothing was in
there, there was not tools I called Kelly Tiller and the manager of the
compound spoke to her and confirmed there was nothing in the van when it was
taken there by police and that I had put thing in the van when I had taken it
out of the compound. At this point Kelly tiller believed me and said
the policy would not be cancelled. But on my way back from the compound
driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and it was Broadsure direct
saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was very upset at this and told
them what had happened, I was asked to hold on they was called KGM back and
would call me right back. I waited till Broadsure direct called me back and
confirmed my insurance policy had not been cancelled then drove home. From this point I have been asking for all
information and putting data protection acts in which have not been dealt
with and I have heard nothing from KGM. I have been back and forward to court due to no
insurance and in fact 4 cases I did not get any summons so was in fact found
guilty as I did not know it was even going to court. I have had points put on my driving licence for
no reason and had to go back and forward to court many times when this should
not have been the case. Then the case come up for the seizer when the
police said I had tools in my van I went to court with all my documents but
due to not having the information I had asked for from KGM many times about
that case I was found guilty. I am very upset about the whole policy with
KGM. I have put an appeal in, and this case will be going to crown court I
have again asked for information and again heard nothing. These matters need
to be addressed as I am suffering due to all of this. Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows
everything that has gone on as he was my main contact. I also have all the emails the last one that I
will enclose again, which I have heard nothing about and the 1st Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the
26/11/2013. I did in fact send the Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998 about time times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into
why I had heard nothing about more than once. Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I
will ask the court to summons the people at KGM to deal with this matter as
they know I was insurance and did nothing wrong and the police lied. All I
have asked for is the data so there will be no need to summons people this
way I can send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown and the
other information and this case should be dropped against me. It just seemed that KGM does not want to do
anything and give me the information I need to prove in fact I was insurance
and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it that I was not insurance. There is a lot more I could say about the
insurance I had with KGM, but this insurance policy was my worst nightmare.
It has messed my clean driving licence up and in fact got to the point I
could not drive so could not work. Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the
information over that was needed to prove I did have insurance. If you need o can send over all the emails that
has been sent back and forward to Broadsure who sent them to KGM. I have lost a lot of money, and time due to this
insurance policy I have had to pay for my vehicles to be taken out of the
police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost of £180.00 to £200.00 a time.
All the loss of work due to having to take time to go to the police compound,
and all the times I have had to go to court for no insurance when in fact I
had insurance. And points put on my driving licence to the fact I could not
drive, this has all been costs to myself. My Mother Lorraine Cordell has also written many
of the emails and is fine with dealing with this issue. 311, Regards Simon Cordell 312, RE: MT3574694->RE_ REF_
00-COSX14MT07-ID_80POpeniAtt°ch4Documents.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 November 2014 14:47 To: ’Martin Jenkin’ Subject: RE: REF: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<80> Open Attach Documents Hi Martin Thank you for getting back to me about this matter, and for you
contacting KGM and getting this addressed, please see the below information
that will be needed. We will also still need the section 9 witness statement
from you. The below section is what will be needed from KGM. · Section 9 witness statement from: Jessica about the call that she took, from the police officer who called
KGM after Simon Cordell was stopped on the 14/11/2013. This statement will
include what was said on the phone call by the police officer and what
Jessica said to the police officer this would also include what sort of tools
the police officer said there was in the van. Any other information as to the
date of the 14/11/2013 and after this date as to any dealing Jessica had with
the stop on the 14/11/2013. Copy of all phone recordings between the police officer, and Jessica
on the date of 14/11/2013. All phone recordings of any calls that were made, to KGM from Simon
Cordell or Lorraine Cordell to try to stop his insurance policy being
cancelled and to address the stop that was made on the 14/11/2013. The phone recording of when Kelly Tiller had asked Simon Cordell to go
to the police compound and get someone from the compound to call Kelly Tiller
about the list of tools that was meant to have been in the van when the
police stopped Mr |Simon Cordell on the 14/11/2013. I believe Simon Cordell
went to the police compound on the 26/11/2013 and this is where the manager
of the compound and Simon Cordell spoke to called Kelly Tiller and confirmed
there was in fact no tools in the van. Copies of all emails that were sent from KGM to Broadsure and
Broadsure to KGM with regard to the police stop of Simon Cordell on the
14/11/2013. This would include all emails of dates after the 14/11/2014 when
Simon Cordell was trying to stop his insurance policy from being cancelled
and was trying to address this matter of what the police had said about there
being tools in his Van which was why the insurance policy was going to be
cancelled. · Section 9 witness statement from: Kelly Tiller as to any dealing she had with the
police stop on Simon Cordell on the 14/11/2013. This would include all
dealing with Broadsure about this matter and any calls that was made to her
by Simon Cordell and Lorraine Cordell, and any calls Kelly Tiller made about
this matter about the cancellation of the policy and the stop by the police
on the 14/11/2014 until this issue was addressed. This would also include all details of the call
that was made by the police compound to Kelly Tiller on the 26/11/2013 to
prove there were no tools in the van. Which in turn stopped the cancelation
of the insurance policy as I believe the reason for the cancellation was due
to Kelly Tiller saying he had voided his insurance due to there being tools
in the van. Full details as to why the insurance policy was
going to be cancelled and what Mr Simon Cordell was meant to have done wrong
which would have in fact made his insurance policy void. file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 313, Page 2 of 3 Full details as to why in the end the insurance policy was not cancelled
and the reasons for not cancelling which was due to Mr Simon Cordell going to
the police compound and the police compound confirming to Kelly Tiller over
the phone there was in fact no tools in the van. The reason why until Jan 2014 that Mr Simon Cordell’s insurance did
not show up on the MID database. Confirmation Simon Cordell did have insurance to drive on the
14/11/2014 and did not void his insurance in any way. Why Kelly Tiller did not deal with all the data protection requests
that had been submitted to KGM, under the data protection act 1998 subject
access request, as if this had been done Simon Cordell would not be in the
court system for this case. Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin Mailto: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 28 November 2014 14:36 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: REF:
00-COSX14MT07-ID<80> Open Attach Documents Lorraine, I have spoken to the manager at KGM and he has
advised Andy Austin is detailing with the case. They have asked for a clear email for me to send
to them of your requirements. Please could you email what is required for me to
forward on! (unfortunately, Kelly is on annual leave at
present) Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 Broadsure Direct - Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax
Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e-mail in file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 314, Page 3 of 3 error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the
message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor
e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 315, RE: MT3574694->Data-Protection-KGM.doc From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 26 November 2013 15:46 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Attachments: Data-Protection-KGM.doc. Kelly-Tiller-KGM.doc Hello Martin, Thank you for the phone call today to tell me I
was still insured. Could you please pass on the attached documents
to Kelly Tiller at KGM one is a Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998. The other letter is just to get Kelly Tiller to
confirm by email I am in fact still insured so I have this in writing and
also to found out why my van is still not showing up on the database. And also, about the logbooks which I am still
waiting for them from DVLA I called DVLA today when I got back from the
compound and was told it can take 8 weeks for me to get the new logbooks, I
will therefore send then right over to you by email as soon as I get them. Many Thanks Simon Cordell file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/ad3ceeed5576443cb0c61af3f3b... 21/01/2015 316, RE: MT3574694->Data-Protection-KGM.doc Mr Simon Cordell 109 Burncroft Ave Enfield
Middlesex EN3 7JQ 25/11/2013 KGM House 14 Eastwood Close London E18 1RZ Dear Sir or Madam Subject access request Mr Simon Cordell 109 Burncroft Ave Enfield
Middlesex EN3 7JQ Please supply the information about me I am
entitled to under the Data Protection Act 1998 relating to: All data to prove that my Vehicles were on the database since my
insurance was taken out. Phone recording of the 14/11/2013 with the police officer and Jessica
advising that Mr Simon Cordell was carrying tools in his vehicle. Phone call for 26/11/2013 with Kelly Tiller and the manager of the
Charlton vehicle pound, 8 Bramshot Avenue, Charlton, London, SE7 7HY, saying
that there were not tools in the van Reg CX52 JRZ when it was impounded on
the 14/11/2013. And the reason why it still shows as of today’s date 25/11/2013 that
my Van Reg CX52 JRZ still shows on the Mid data base as uninsured. All phone calls made to Broadsure Direct and KGM since my policy
started where the police have had to call to confirm I was in fact insured. If there is any data that cannot be forwarding to me, please state
this when forwarding me my data. 317, If you need any more information from me, or a fee,
please let me know as soon as possible. It may be helpful for you to know that a request
for information under the Data Protection Act 1998 should be responded to
within 40 days. If you do not normally deal with these requests,
please pass this letter to your Data Protection Officer. If you need advice
on dealing with this request, the Information Commissioner’s Office can
assist you and can be contacted on 0303 123 1113 or at www.ico.org.uk/ Yours faithfully Mr Simon Cordell 318, RE: MT3574694->Kelly-Tiller-KGM.doc Mr Simon Cordell 109 Burncroft Ave Enfield
Middlesex EN3 7JQ 25/11/2013 KGM House 14 Eastwood Close London E18 1RZ Dear Kelly Tiller Would it please be possible to confirm by email
that I am in fact still insured so I have this in writing by KGM. Also, I have talked to Martin and he has told me
that you need the logbook for my Vehicles, I am still waiting for them to
come back from DVLA and as soon as I get them back which can take up to 8
weeks, I have been told by DVLA on the phone today, I will scan them in and
send them over to Martin. Also, can you please look into the reason that my
Van CX52 JRZ is still showing up on the database as uninsured as of today’s
date. My Car MA57 LDY is now showing as insured. Yours faithfully Mr Simon Cordell END |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
45. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 45 complaints@lloyds.com_01.22.2015_Notification Case
No 80792014 - MT3574694_001 22/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 319,320,321,322,323,324 325,326,327,328,329,330 “The Files below got
moved from 21/01/2015 to here!” 1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 421. Complaints
Notification Case No 8079_2014 - MT3574694 / Page Numbers: 1285,1286,1287,1288,1289,1290,1291,1292, Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 422. Complaints
Notification Case No 8079_2014 - MT3574694_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1293,1294,1295,1296, 1297,1298,1299,1300,1301,1302 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 423. Complaints
Notification Case No 7692_2014 – Cordell / Page Numbers: 1303 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 424. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Notification Case No 8079_2014 - MT3574694 / Page Numbers: 1304,1305,1306,1307,1308, 1309,1310,1311,1312,1313,1314 |
22/01/2015 |
12:08:00 |
X12 319,320 321,322,323,324 325,326,327,328 329,330, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
46. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 46 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_01.22.2015_RE Notification
Case No 80792014 - MT3574694 22/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 331,332,333,334,335,336 337,338,339,340,341,342 343 |
22/01/2015 |
15:55:00 |
X13 331,332 333,334,335,336 337,338,339,340 341,342,343, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
45. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 45 complaints@lloyds.com_01.22.2015_Notification Case
No 80792014 - MT3574694_001 22/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 319,320,321,322,323,324 325,326,327,328,329,330 -- 319, From: Complaints complaints@lloyds.com Sent: 22 January 2015
12:08 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Notification Case
No 8079/2014 - MT3574694 Attachments: S Cordell Cert KGM_
2013-2014_Colour.pdf Information we
need.pdf Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
Thank you for your
emails. Ø
I note that you have
been liaising with Canopius in regard to your complaint and from the
correspondence we have on file that it is your intention to go to court. Ø
Lloyd's complaints
procedure is to offer policyholders the option for a review by Lloyd's, should
they remain dissatisfied with the way in which their complaint has been
handled. Ø
This is an
independent review by a case officer at Lloyd's. Ø
However please note
once a complaint becomes the subject of a court case Lloyd's can take no
further action and we would have to cease our investigation. Ø
Therefore, please
can you confirm whether you are providing these emails for information only
or whether you wish Lloyd's to review your case in place of potential court
proceedings. Kind regards Cheryl Mrs Cheryl Shannon Case
Officer Complaints Lloyd's Telephone +44 (0)1634 39 5693
www.lloyds.com SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
PRINT From: Lorraine Cordell Mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 22:53 To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Cc: Complaints Subject: FW: MT3574694 Dear Andrew Please see attached Insurance, which will show
you full details of his insurance policy and dates covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can
be sorted out by the court and I can send the information over to the CPS for
the case of the 14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools in
my van to void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and Jessica
know fully what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call from the
police officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my
policy and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and she was
the one that believed the police until I went to the police compound and
spoke to the manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not done
this Kelly Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have all
the emails to prove this. 320, After Kelly Tiller found out I was not lying
about having no tools in my van the insurance policy was kept in place, I did
ask Kelly Tiller on more than once to send me the information and put data
requests in which was not replied to. Now I have been found guilty when Kelly
Tiller knows the truth that there was not tools and the police officer lied
to KGM on the phone call. I am the one that has suffered over all this not
just on this case but all the times I have been taken to court for no
insurance over the year my policy run with KGM due to it not showing on the
MID database. You should have all the emails already from
Broadsure Direct and many was sent by them to KGM as I was told KGM could not
talk to me and I had to deal with Broadsure Direct about my policy Martin
Jenkins from Broadsure Direct should also have copies of all emails as I do. I have spoken to DVLA today and asked for the
data of how many times points was put on my licence due to not getting
summons from police and then dealing with cases I knew nothing about and then
I had to get the cases reopened, I have to write them a letter and they will
send the data I have asked for in the post. I do have a lot of letters which I will sort out
scan and send over. But the 1st part I want to deal with is the court case I
was found guilty at and have put an appeal in that is the most important to
me right now. We can deal with everything else once I get all
the data scanned as there is really a lot and it was all due to KGM not
sorting out why my insurance was not showing on the MID database. The seizers
alone have left me out of pocket by around £1700.00. That is without all the
days I have not been able to work due to my driving licence being messed up
and showing points for no insurance. All the time going back and forward to
the compound to collect my vehicles, and everything else I have had to deal
with the courts when in fact I had done nothing wrong. I have tried to deal with this for months and
months without going to the ombudsman and KGM has taken no notice, it has
taken me to go to the ombudsman for KGM to take any notice and I don’t feel
anyone would be happy with this sort of service from KGM let alone any
company doing this and causing someone so much suffering. It was one of the police in the end at the
compound who in the end worked out why it was not showing up on the MID and
that was because there had been a space put within my Reg Numbers. It was that
bad two police compounds new me and said each time not again. As you can see, I am not very happy about all of
this, but I do not think anyone would be when they paid for their insurance
and had done nothing wrong to suffer all this. Therefore, could you please get the information I
need to send to the CPS; I have written what was needed from Nov 2014 and way
before this, and it still has not been sent and I have this hanging over my
head. I did not just get points on my licence I got disqualified from driving
for 6 months due to repeat offending of no insurance please tell me why when
I have paid for my insurance from KGM? The reason it has not been enforced is
due to me putting an appeal in. You can contact my mother on 0208 245 7454 or
07961 833021 Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew Mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Sent: 21 January 2015 16:13 321, To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, I have detailed the process for requesting information under the
subject access request and if you wish to proceed with this please confirm. In the meantime, I am keen to assist you if I can in confirming when
cover was in force. Please can you confirm if there is a contact number, I can call you or
your Mother on and a time that is acceptable so that I can try and help
resolve this particular issue for you. I look forward to hearing from you with this information. Regards, Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of
the UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close |
London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 | M 07469 147743 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Andrew I will forward this to you within a few days I
will ask the police compound to do a full print out as to all the tickets as
I believe there is a few missing. I do have around 6 of the tickets here when the
vehicles were sized, I also do have court letters, and letters from DVLA,
which I will forward over to you once I have scanned then in so please give
me a few days and I will get back to you with this information as there is a
lot of data. The main one at this time I am worried about is
the case where the vehicle was sized due to the police lying and me being
found guilty at court you did have an email on the 30 November 2014 about
what was needed and I do have the court letter showing I was found guilty and
about the appeal. This data should have been given under the
Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 I put in, so was
wondering what you can do about this and if you will need a new Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in
so to do a 4th I do not feel I should need to do. KGM have in fact did not follow the protocol for the Subject access
request under the Data Protection Act 1998 which has been put in 3 times
already to KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information Commissioner’s
Office as I do not see any reason you would have to stop the information, I
have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact guilty of no
insurance. And now say to deal with this you need information
from me. I can understand you want the information for the complaint that has
been put in, but not the information I asked for to show I was in fact I was
insured for an appeal that is ongoing. And in fact, would not have been
ongoing if the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 as I
would not have been found guilty. I would like the data sent to the court as soon
as possible in regard to this so they can look at the facts and see if fact I
was insured so there should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more
of my time wasted going to court. 322, Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell Thank you for your email. My letter dated 22/12/14 requests the following
documentary evidence from you With regards to any losses that may have been
incurred as a result of the above, I confirm as detailed in my previous
letter, I require the following: - Confirmation of the points you raised to the Financial Ombudsman when
you verbally submitted your complaint and the outcome you are looking to
achieve. Full details of the losses that you have incurred as a direct result
of your complaint and full documentary evidence supporting this. Confirmation of dates of any convictions or costs imposed directly as
a result of your complaint, including full documentary evidence supporting
this. Once I receive all of the above, I will be happy
to consider this further. With regards to your subject access request. My
letter of the 9/12/14 advised the following: - Following our initial investigations, we note
that you submitted a subject access request to your Broker. Should you wish
to proceed with this, please can you formally request this in writing to our
Data Protection Officer at the address detailed at the foot of the letter
including a cheque payable to KGM Insurance for the sum of £10.00. Alternatively,
you may wish to wait until our full investigations have been finalised. Can you please confirm how you wish to proceed
with that request? Should you not be in receipt of any of the letters I refer to advise
me above, please and I will ensure copies are sent to you immediately. I await your reply Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of
the UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close |
London | E18 1RZ From: Lorraine Cordell Mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 323, To Whom It May Concern: I am writing due to the complaint I put in. I
have forwarded emails to Broadsure Direct and spoken to Broadsure Direct who
took the policy of insurance out policy no: MT3574694 I have been asking for information from KGM since
2013 and have heard nothing back. When the policy was taken out there was some reason
it did not show up on the MID database Broadsure Direct and KGM was aware of
this. Due to this fact I had my vehicles were sized a
number of times I believe 8 or 9 times in all, where I had to pay the costs
to get my vehicles out the compound each time. In the week when I was pulled
by police it was not so bad as the insurance company was opened so when I
showed the police my policy, they could call the insurance company. The seizers happened mostly at the weekend mostly
due to the insurance company being closed and the police could not talk to
anyone even when I had my policy on me at all times to prove I did in fact
have insurance. I made many calls to the police, Broadsure
Direct, KGM and the people who run the MID database, but the issue did not go
away, and my vehicles still did not show up on the MID database. There was also a time in Nov 2013 when my van was
sized this was due to KGM telling the police I was not insured due to the
police telling KGM that I had tools in my van. Which was a lie by the police
as I did not have anything in my van. Kelly Tiller from the trade section was
dealing with this and a few days later I got a letter from KGM saying they
was going to cancel my policy. As you can understand I was very upset over
this as I had done nothing wrong. At these times lots of calls was both made to KMG
and Broadsure to stop the cancelation of my insurance policy, I spoke to
Kelly Tiller many times, but she believed the police and I had no say in the
matter. The police were off duty so I could not speak to them and Kelly
Tiller was saying unless I could prove I did not have any tools in my van
then the insurance policy would be cancelled which was very unfair as I had
done nothing wrong, I knew I never had any tools. But I also asked Kelly Tiller did the police tell
her what tools was meant to be in my van, to which she said no. KGM was not
even aware I had mechanics trade on my policy so if my mechanics tools had
been in my van at the time my insurance would still have been cancelled which
to me what was the point in having insurance? I then spoke to a wonderful operator at the
police when I called told her what had gone on and was told by her to go to
the police compound as when any vehicles are taken there, they have to do a
full list of items that are in the vehicles as they are in fact legible if
something goes missing. Over that weekend I sent emails to the compound and
forwarded them to Broadsure as my insurance was due to be cancelled on the
Monday. On Monday I got an email from Broadsure direct asking me to go to the
compound as Kelly Tiller had no luck getting a reply from them also, and once
there to call Kelly Tiller due to the time on the Monday I got the email it
would have been too late to go the compound and get a call to Kelly Tiller as
she would have ended work for that day so I sent an email saying I would be
going there early the next morning. I went the next day and asked to speak to the
manager of the compound who in fact looked up my van and said nothing was in
there, there was not tools I called Kelly Tiller and the manager of the
compound spoke to her and confirmed there was nothing in the van when it was
taken there by police and that I had put thing in the van when I had taken it
out of the compound. At this point Kelly tiller believed me and said
the policy would not be cancelled. But on my way back from the compound
driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and it was Broadsure direct
saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was very upset at this and told
them what had happened, I was asked to hold on they was called KGM back and
would call me right back. I 324, waited till Broadsure direct called me back and confirmed
my insurance policy had not been cancelled then drove home. From this point I have been asking for all
information and putting data protection acts in which have not been dealt
with and I have heard nothing from KGM. I have been back and forward to court due to no
insurance and in fact 4 cases I did not get any summons so was in fact found
guilty as I did not know it was even going to court. I have had points put on my driving licence for
no reason and had to go back and forward to court many times when this should
not have been the case. Then the case come up for the seizer when the
police said I had tools in my van I went to court with all my documents but
due to not having the information I had asked for from KGM many times about
that case I was found guilty. I am very upset about the whole policy with
KGM. I have put an appeal in, and this case will be going to crown court I
have again asked for information and again heard nothing. These matters need
to be addressed as I am suffering due to all of this. Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows
everything that has gone on as he was my main contact. I also have all the emails the last one that I
will enclose again, which I have heard nothing about and the 1st Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the
26/11/2013. I did in fact send the Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998 about time times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into
why I had heard nothing about more than once. Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I
will ask the court to summons the people at KGM to deal with this matter as
they know I was insurance and did nothing wrong and the police lied. All I
have asked for is the data so there will be no need to summons people this
way I can send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown and the
other information and this case should be dropped against me. It just seemed that KGM does not want to do
anything and give me the information I need to prove in fact I was insurance
and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it that I was not insurance. There is a lot more I could say about the
insurance I had with KGM, but this insurance policy was my worst nightmare.
It has messed my clean driving licence up and in fact got to the point I could
not drive so could not work. Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the
information over that was needed to prove I did have insurance. If you need o can send over all the emails that
has been sent back and forward to Broadsure who sent them to KGM. I have lost a lot of money, and time due to this
insurance policy I have had to pay for my vehicles to be taken out of the
police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost of £180.00 to £200.00 a time.
All the loss of work due to having to take time to go to the police compound,
and all the times I have had to go to court for no insurance when in fact I
had insurance. And points put on my driving licence to the fact I could not
drive, this has all been costs to myself. My Mother Lorraine Cordell has also written many
of the emails and is fine with dealing with this issue. Regards Simon Cordell 325, Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered
number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the
content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number
01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by
the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales The information in this E-Mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged. 326, If you are NOT the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. You should NOT
retain, copy, or use this E-mail for any purpose, nor disclose all or any
part of its contents to any other person or persons. Any views expressed in this message are those of
the individual sender, EXCEPT where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Lloyd's. Lloyd's may monitor the content of E-mails sent
and received via its network for viruses or unauthorised use and for other
lawful business purposes. Lloyd's is authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 327,
End of Picture! 328, Notification Case No 8079/2014 - MT3574fpagfnfJri°fti0n we need.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 November 2014 14:47 To: ’Martin Jenkin’ Subject: RE: REF: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<80> Open Attach Documents Hi Martin Thank you for getting back to me about this matter, and for you
contacting KGM and getting this addressed, please see the below information that
will be needed. We will also still need the section 9 witness statement from
you. The below section is what will be needed from KGM. · Section 9 witness statement from: Jessica about the call that she took, from the police officer who
called KGM after Simon Cordell was stopped on the 14/11/2013. This statement
will include what was said on the phone call by the police officer and what
Jessica said to the police officer this would also include what sort of tools
the police officer said there was in the van. Any other information as to the
date of the 14/11/2013 and after this date as to any dealing Jessica had with
the stop on the 14/11/2013. Copy of all phone recordings between the police officer, and Jessica
on the date of 14/11/2013. All phone recordings of any calls that were made, to KGM from Simon
Cordell or Lorraine Cordell to try to stop his insurance policy being
cancelled and to address the stop that was made on the 14/11/2013. The phone recording of when Kelly Tiller had asked Simon Cordell to go
to the police compound and get someone from the compound to call Kelly Tiller
about the list of tools that was meant to have been in the van when the
police stopped Mr |Simon Cordell on the 14/11/2013. I believe Simon Cordell
went to the police compound on the 26/11/2013 and this is where the manager
of the compound and Simon Cordell spoke to called Kelly Tiller and confirmed
there was in fact no tools in the van. Copies of all emails that were sent from KGM to Broadsure and
Broadsure to KGM with regard to the police stop of Simon Cordell on the
14/11/2013. This would include all emails of dates after the 14/11/2014 when
Simon Cordell was trying to stop his insurance policy from being cancelled
and was trying to address this matter of what the police had said about there
being tools in his Van which was why the insurance policy was going to be
cancelled. · Section 9 witness statement from: Kelly Tiller as to any dealing she had with the police stop on Simon
Cordell on the 14/11/2013. This would include all dealing with Broadsure
about this matter and any calls that was made to her by Simon Cordell and
Lorraine Cordell, and any calls Kelly Tiller made about this matter about the
cancellation of the policy and the stop by the police on the 14/11/2014 until
this issue was addressed. This would also include all details of the call that was made by the
police compound to Kelly Tiller on the 26/11/2013 to prove there were no
tools in the van. Which in turn stopped the cancelation of the insurance
policy as I believe the reason for the cancellation was due to Kelly Tiller
saying he had voided his insurance due to there being tools in the van. Full details as to why the insurance policy was going to be cancelled
and what Mr Simon Cordell was meant to have done wrong which would have in
fact made his insurance policy void. file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 329, Page 2 of 3 Full details as to why in the end the insurance policy was not
cancelled and the reasons for not cancelling which was due to Mr Simon
Cordell going to the police compound and the police compound confirming to
Kelly Tiller over the phone there was in fact no tools in the van. The reason why until Jan 2014 that Mr Simon Cordell’s insurance did
not show up on the MID database. Confirmation Simon Cordell did have insurance to drive on the
14/11/2014 and did not void his insurance in any way. Why Kelly Tiller did not deal with all the data protection requests
that had been submitted to KGM, under the data protection act 1998 subject access
request, as if this had been done Simon Cordell would not be in the court
system for this case. Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin Mailto: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 28 November 2014 14:36 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: REF:
00-COSX14MT07-ID<80> Open Attach Documents Lorraine, I have spoken to the manager at KGM and he has advised Andy Austin is
detailing with the case. They have asked for a clear email for me to send to them of your
requirements. Please could you email what is required for me to forward on! (unfortunately, Kelly is on annual leave at present) Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 Broadsure Direct - Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax
Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e-mail in file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 330, Page 3 of 3 error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the
message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor
e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 421. Complaints Notification Case No 8079_2014
- MT3574694 / Page Numbers: 1285,1286,1287,1288,1289,1290,1291,1292, From: Complaints [complaints@lloyds.com] Sent: 22 January 2015 12:08 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Notification Case No 8079/2014 MT3574694 Attachments: S Cordell Cert. _ KGM_ 20132014_Colour.pdf Information we need.pdf Dear Mr Cordell, Thank you for your emails.
I note that you have been liaising with Canopius in regard to your complaint
and from the correspondence we have on file that it is your intention to go
to court. Lloyd’s complaints procedure is to offer policyholders the option
for a review by Lloyd’s, should they remain dissatisfied with the way in
which their complaint has been handled. This is an independent review by a
case officer at Lloyd’s. However please note once a complaint becomes the
subject of a court case Lloyd’s can take no further action and we would have
to cease our investigation. Therefore, please can you confirm whether you are
providing these emails for information only or whether you wish Lloyd’s to
review your case in place of potential court proceedings. Kind regards Cheryl Mrs Cheryl Shannon Case Officer Complaints Lloyd's Telephone +44 (0)1634 39
5693 SAVE PAPER THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 22:53 To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Cc: Complaints Subject: FW: MT3574694 Dear Andrew Please see attached
Insurance, which will show you full details of his insurance policy and dates
covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can be sorted out by
the court and I can send the information over to the CPS for the case of the
14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools in my van to
void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and Jessica know fully
what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call from the police
officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my policy
and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and she was the one
that believed the police until I went to the police compound and spoke to the
manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not done this Kelly
Tiller would have cancelled me 1286,1287,1288,1289,1290,1291,1292, 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 422. Complaints
Notification Case No 8079_2014 - MT3574694_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1293,1294,1295,1296,1297,1298,1299,1300,1301,1302, 22/01/2015 From: Complaints [complaints@lloyds.com] Sent: 22 January 2015 15:04 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: Notification Case
No 8079/2014 MT3574694 Dear Mrs Cordell, Ø Thank you for your email and for speaking to
me this afternoon. Ø Just to clarify our conversation, Ø you wish to allow KGM 7 days to supply you
with the Subject Access Request and call recordings as requested by you. Ø You wish to continue to copy us in
correspondence for our records only and that we will not escalate your
complaint to a Lloyd’s review unless you instruct us to. Kind regards Cheryl Mrs Cheryl Shannon Case Officer Complaints Lloyd's Telephone +44 (0)1634 39 5693 SAVE PAPER THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT 22/01/2015 From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 January 2015 14:10 To: Complaints Subject: RE: Notification Case
No 8079/2014 MT3574694 Dear Mrs Cheryl Shannon Ø Thank you for the email it is not my intention
to go to court yet. Ø But due to the mess up with my insurance from
KGM my driving licence has been very badly damaged, and I have suffered due
to the insurance I had with KGM not showing up on the Police MID database. Ø This in turn made me keep getting pulled by
the police on the weekdays it was not so bad as I always had to carry my
insurance policy and showed the police and they called my insurance company. Ø But at the weekends due to the insurance
company being closed the police could not confirm I had insurance so my
vehicles were sized which in turn I suffered with the cost to take my
vehicles out of the police compound and wasted my time having to go to the
compound when there should have been no need. Ø Also, it caused me problems getting home after
the police sized my vehicles. I am out of pocket of around £1700.00 just
for the cost to get my vehicles out of the compound this is without
everything else that has led on due to it showing I was not insured. Ø I have had to go to a number of court cases
just to prove I had insurance and then there have been cases where I have had
no summons from the police so could not file, Ø I was pleading not guilty so they found me
guilty when I did not even know there was a court case going ahead. Ø This has put points on my driving licence and
fines, and I have been banned from driving. Ø I have had to spend my time to get the cases
reopened once I knew about them also. 1294, Ø In addition, there was one case when the
police lied to my insurance company that I had tools in my van which I did
not. Ø Which I had to spend more of my time to prove
to KGM that in fact there was no tools in my van as my insurance was getting
cancelled for no good reason. Ø I done this by way of having to go to the
police compound as when any vehicle is impounded, they have list everything
that was in the vehicle. Ø When I got to the police compound, I spoke to
a manager who confirmed there were no tools, and a telephone call was made to
Kelly Tiller at KGM and she spoke to the manager and he confirmed to her
there was no tools when the van was taken into the police compound or when it
was removed from the police compound. Ø I knew this case would go to court as the
police office had in fact tried to make my insurance void, Ø so, I put in Subject access request under the
Data Protection Act 1998 to be able to get the information I knew I would
need. Ø KGM done nothing about this I did not get one
reply from putting 3 Subject access requests under the Data Protection Act
1998 this was going back to Nov 2013. Ø this case was heard at court and due to not
having the information I needed to prove the police office was not telling
the truth I was found guilty and disqualified from driving for 6 months due
to repeat offending of no insurance. Ø I have appealed this as I was insured but need
the data which KGM hold to prove this, but they will not give me it. Ø This case is due to go to the crown court I
have not got a date yet but if I can get the information to the CPS it will
not need to go to appeal. Ø I have asked KGM again in Nov 2014 for
the information and written what would be needed just for this case, and they
still have not sent it and I being asked for information. Ø ATM as it stands KGM have failed to comply
with 3 Subject access requests under the Data Protection Act 1998 and follow
the correct protocol for acting on a Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998. Ø All this is having a huge impact on my life
not being able to drive due to points on my driving licence which in fact was
clean now I have such a mess to sort out just to get all of this sorted when
I was in fact insured and had paid for my insurance and have done nothing
wrong. Ø Yes, I am very upset over all of this and KGM
is not helping I have been asking and asking and getting nowhere I should not
be going through this. Ø Yes, I do want my money back I have lost but
right now I want these court cases to be dealt with and for my driving
licence to go back to being clean with no points this is the most important
part for me but KGM does not seem to understand this and this is upsetting me
even more, the insurance I took out with KGM has turned into a nightmare and
I don’t know when this is going to end and they are going to deal with this
matter so I can clear my name with DVLA and the courts. Ø I am forwarding you all the emails I am
sending so you can see what is going on and keep updated. Ø As you can see, I am not getting very far with
the information I need to clear my name with the courts and DVLA. Ø If KGM fail to comply with the Subject access
request under the Data Protection Act 1998 and give me the information I need
within 7 days I will be putting it in your hands to deal with all of the
matters as this has been going on long enough. Regards Simon Cordell From: Complaints [Mail To: complaints@lloyds.com] Sent: 22 January 2015 12:08 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Notification Case No 8079/2014 MT3574694 Dear Mr. Cordell, 1295, Thank you for your
emails. Ø
I note that you have been
liaising with Canopius in regard to your complaint and from the
correspondence we have on file that it is your intention to go to court. Ø
Lloyd’s complaints procedure is
to offer policyholders the option for a review by Lloyd’s, should they remain
dissatisfied with the way in which their complaint has been handled. Ø
This is an independent review
by a case officer at Lloyd’s. Ø
However please note once a
complaint becomes the subject of a court case Lloyd’s can take no further
action and we would have to cease our investigation. Ø
Therefore, please can you
confirm whether you are providing these emails for information only or
whether you wish Lloyd’s to review your case in place of potential court
proceedings. Kind regards Cheryl Mrs Cheryl Shannon Case Officer Complaints Lloyd's Telephone +44 (0)1634 39
5693 SAVE PAPER THINK BEFORE
YOU PRINT From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 22:53 To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Cc: Complaints Subject: FW: MT3574694 Dear Andrew Please see attached
Insurance, which will show you full details of his insurance policy and dates
covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can be sorted out by
the court and I can send the information over to the CPS for the case of the
14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools in my van to
void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and Jessica know fully
what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call from the police
officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my policy
and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and she was the one
that believed the police until I went to the police compound and spoke to the
manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not done this Kelly
Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have all the emails
to prove this. After Kelly Tiller found out I was not lying about having no
tools in my van the insurance policy was kept in place, I did ask Kelly
Tiller on more than once to send me the information and put data requests in
which was not replied to. Now I have been found guilty when Kelly Tiller
knows the truth that there was not tools and the police officer lied to KGM
on the phone call. I am the one that has suffered over all this not just on
this case but all the times I have been taken to court for no insurance over
the year my policy run with KGM due to it not showing on the MID 1296,1297,1298,1299,1300,1301,1302, 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 423. Complaints
Notification Case No 7692_2014 - Cordell / Page Numbers: 1303, From: Complaints [complaints@lloyds.com] Sent: 22 January 2015 15:11 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Notification Case
No 7692/2014 Cordell Dear Mrs Cordell, Ø Please note our correct case number for future
reference 7692/2014. Ø I apologise for the inconvenience. Kind regards Cheryl Mrs Cheryl Shannon Case Officer Complaints Lloyd's Telephone +44 (0)1634 39 5693 SAVE PAPER THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT The information in this Email and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL
and may be privileged. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please destroy
this message and notify the sender immediately. You should NOT retain, copy
or use this Email for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of its
contents to any other person or persons. Any views expressed in this message
are those of the individual sender, EXCEPT where the sender specifically
states them to be the views of Lloyd’s. Lloyd’s may monitor the content of
Emails sent and received via its network for viruses or unauthorised use and
for other lawful business purposes. Lloyd's is authorised under the Financial
Services and Markets Act 2000 4. The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 424. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Notification Case No 8079_2014 - MT3574694 / Page Numbers: 1304,1305,1306,1307,1308,1309,1310,1311,1312,1313,1314, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 January 2015 15:55 To: 'Andrew.Austin@canopius.com' Cc: 'complaints@lloyds.com' Subject: RE: Notification Case
No 8079/2014 MT3574694 Attachments: Information we
need.pdf Dear Andrew Ø Please see the below email from Mrs Cheryl
Shannon, Case Officer, Complaints, Lloyd's and my reply. Ø I said to her I am willing to give you 7 days
to get the information, Ø we have been asking for to clear my son’s name
at court. Ø Please see attached for information we need. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Complaints [Mail To: complaints@lloyds.com] Sent: 22 January 2015 15:04 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: Notification Case No 8079/2014 MT3574694 Dear Mrs Cordell, Thank you for your email
and for speaking to me this afternoon. Just to clarify our conversation, you
wish to allow KGM 7 days to supply you with the Subject Access Request and
call recordings as requested by you. You wish to continue to copy us in
correspondence for our records only and that we will not escalate your
complaint to a Lloyd’s review unless you instruct us to. Kind regards Cheryl Mrs Cheryl Shannon Case Officer Complaints Lloyd's Telephone +44 (0)1634 39
5693 SAVE PAPER THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 January 2015 14:10 To: Complaints Subject: RE: Notification Case No 8079/2014 MT3574694 Dear Mrs Cheryl Shannon 1305, Thank you for the email
it is not my intention to go to court yet. But due to the mess up with my
insurance from KGM my driving licence has been very badly damaged, and I have
suffered due to the insurance I had with KGM not showing up on the Police MID
database. This in turn made me keep getting pulled by the police on the
weekdays it was not so bad as I always had to carry my insurance policy and
showed the police and they called my insurance company. But at the weekends
due to the insurance company being closed the police could not confirm I had
insurance so my vehicles were sized which in turn I suffered with the cost to
take my vehicles out of the police compound and wasted my time having to go
to the compound when there should have been no need. Also, it caused me
problems getting home after the police sized my vehicles. I am out of pocket
of around £1700.00 just for the cost to get my vehicles out of the compound
this is without everything else that has led on due to it showing I was not
insured. I have had to go to a number of court cases just to prove I had
insurance and then there have been cases where I have had no summons from the
police so could not file, I was pleading not guilty so they found me guilty
when I did not even know there was a court case going ahead. This has put
points on my driving licence and fines, and I have been banned from driving. I
have had to spend my time to get the cases reopened once I knew about them
also. In addition, there was one case when the police lied to my insurance
company that I had tools in my van which I did not. Which I had to spend more
of my time to prove to KGM that in fact there was no tools in my van as my
insurance was getting cancelled for no good reason. I done this by way of
having to go to the police compound as when any vehicle is impounded, they
have list everything that was in the vehicle. When I got to the police
compound, I spoke to a manager who confirmed there were no tools, and a
telephone call was made to Kelly Tiller at KGM and she spoke to the manager
and he confirmed to her there was no tools when the van was taken into the
police compound or when it was removed from the police compound. I knew this
case would go to court as the police office had in fact tried to make my
insurance void, so I put in Subject access request under the Data Protection
Act 1998 to be able to get the information I knew I would need. KGM done
nothing about this I did not get one reply from putting 3 Subject access
requests under the Data Protection Act 1998 this was going back to Nov 2013.
this case was heard at court and due to not having the information I needed
to prove the police office was not telling the truth I was found guilty and
disqualified from driving for 6 months due to repeat offending of no
insurance. I have appealed this as I was insured but need the data which KGM
hold to prove this, but they will not give me it. This case is due to go to
the crown court I have not got a date yet but if I can get the information to
the CPS it will not need to go to appeal. I have asked KGM again in Nov 2014
for the information and written what would be needed just for this case, and
they still have not sent it and I being asked for information. ATM as it
stands KGM have failed to comply with 3 Subject access requests under the
Data Protection Act 1998 and follow the correct protocol for acting on a
Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998. All this is having
a huge impact on my life not being able to drive due to points on my driving
licence which in fact was clean now I have such a mess to sort out just to
get all of this sorted when I was in fact insured and had paid for my
insurance and have done nothing wrong. Yes, I am very upset over all of this
and KGM is not helping I have been asking and asking and getting nowhere I
should not be going through this. Yes, I do want my money back I have lost
but right now I want these court cases to be dealt with and for my driving
licence to go back to being clean with no points this is the most important
part for me but KGM does not seem to understand this and this is upsetting me
even more, the insurance I took out with KGM has turned into a nightmare and
I don’t know when this is going to end and they are going to deal with this
matter so I can clear my name with DVLA and the courts. 1306, I am forwarding you all
the emails I am sending so you can see what is going on and keep updated. As
you can see, I am not getting very far with the information I need to clear
my name with the courts and DVLA. If KGM fail to comply with the Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 and give me the information
I need within 7 days I will be putting it in your hands to deal with all of
the matters as this has been going on long enough. Regards Simon Cordell From: Complaints [Mail To: complaints@lloyds.com] Sent: 22 January 2015 12:08 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Notification Case No 8079/2014 MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, Thank you for your
emails. I note that you have been liaising with Canopius in regard to your
complaint and from the correspondence we have on file that it is your
intention to go to court. Lloyd’s complaints procedure is to offer
policyholders the option for a review by Lloyd’s, should they remain
dissatisfied with the way in which their complaint has been handled. This is
an independent review by a case officer at Lloyd’s. However please note once
a complaint becomes the subject of a court case Lloyd’s can take no further
action and we would have to cease our investigation. Therefore, please can
you confirm whether you are providing these emails for information only or
whether you wish Lloyd’s to review your case in place of potential court
proceedings. Kind regards Cheryl Mrs Cheryl Shannon Case Officer Complaints Lloyd's Telephone +44 (0)1634 39
5693 SAVE PAPER THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 22:53 To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Cc: Complaints Subject:
FW: MT3574694 1307,1308,1309,1310,1311,1312,1313,1314, 46. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 46 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_01.22.2015_RE Notification
Case No 80792014 - MT3574694 22/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 331,332,333,334,335,336 337,338,339,340,341,342 343 -- 331, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 22 January 2015 15:55 To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Cc: complaints@lloyds.com Subject: RE: Notification Case No 8079/2014 - Attachments: MT3574694 Information we need.pdf Dear Andrew Please see the below email from Mrs Cheryl Shannon, Case Officer,
Complaints, Lloyd’s, and my reply. I said to her I am willing to give you 7 days to get the information,
we have been asking for to clear my son's name at court. Please see attached
for information we need. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Complaints mailto: complaints@lloyds.com Sent: 22 January 2015 15:04 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: Notification Case No 8079/2014 -
MT3574694 Dear Mrs Cordell, Thank you for your email and for speaking to me this afternoon. with the Subject Access Request and call recordings that we will not
escalate your complaint to a Lloyd's Kind regards Cheryl Just to clarify our conversation, you wish to allow KGM 7 days to
supply you as requested by you. You wish to continue to copy us in correspondence for our records only
and review unless you instruct us to. Mrs Cheryl Shannon Case Officer Complaints Lloyd's Telephone +44 (0)1634 39 5693 www.lloyds.com SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT From: Lorraine Cordell Mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 22 January 2015 14:10 To: Complaints Subject: RE: Notification Case No 8079/2014 -
MT3574694 Dear Mrs Cheryl Shannon 332, Thank you for the email it is not my intention to go to court yet. But due to the mess up with my insurance from KGM my driving licence
has been very badly damaged, and I have suffered due to the insurance I had
with KGM not showing up on the Police MID database. This in turn made me keep
getting pulled by the police on the weekdays it was not so bad as I always
had to carry my insurance policy and showed the police and they called my
insurance company. But at the weekends due to the insurance company being
closed the police could not confirm I had insurance so my vehicles were sized
which in turn I suffered with the cost to take my vehicles out of the police
compound and wasted my time having to go to the compound when there should
have been no need. Also, it caused me problems getting home after the police
sized my vehicles. I am out of pocket of around £1700.00 just for the cost to
get my vehicles out of the compound this is without everything else that has
led on due to it showing I was not insured. I have had to go to a number of court cases just to prove I had
insurance and then there have been cases where I have had no summons from the
police so could not file, I was pleading not guilty so they found me guilty
when I did not even know there was a court case going ahead. This has put points on my driving licence and fines, and I have been
banned from driving. I have had to spend my time to get the cases reopened
once I knew about them also. In addition, there was one case when the police lied to my insurance
company that I had tools in my van which I did not. Which I had to spend more
of my time to prove to KGM that in fact there was no tools in my van as my
insurance was getting cancelled for no good reason. I done this by way of
having to go to the police compound as when any vehicle is impounded, they
have list everything that was in the vehicle. When I got to the police
compound, I spoke to a manager who confirmed there were no tools, and a
telephone call was made to Kelly Tiller at KGM and she spoke to the manager
and he confirmed to her there was no tools when the van was taken into the
police compound or when it was removed from the police compound. I knew this case would go to court as the police office had in fact
tried to make my insurance void, so I put in Subject access request under the
Data Protection Act 1998 to be able to get the information I knew I would
need. KGM done nothing about this I did not get one reply from putting 3
Subject access requests under the Data Protection Act 1998 this was going
back to Nov 2013. this case was heard at court and due to not having the
information I needed to prove the police office was not telling the truth I
was found guilty and disqualified from driving for 6 months due to repeat
offending of no insurance. I have appealed this as I was insured but need the
data which KGM hold to prove this, but they will not give me it. This case is
due to go to the crown court I have not got a date yet but if I can get the
information to the CPS it will not need to go to appeal. I have asked KGM
again in Nov 2014 for the information and written what would be needed just
for this case, and they still have not sent it and I being asked for
information. ATM as it stands KGM have failed to comply with 3 Subject access
requests under the Data Protection Act 1998 and follow the correct protocol
for acting on a Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998. All this is having a huge impact on my life not being able to drive
due to points on my driving licence which in fact was clean now I have such a
mess to sort out just to get all of this sorted when I was in fact insured
and had paid for my insurance and have done nothing wrong. Yes, I am very upset over all of this and KGM is not helping I have
been asking and asking and getting nowhere I should not be going through
this. Yes, I do want my money back I have lost but right now I want these
court cases to be dealt with and for my driving licence to go back to being
clean with no points this is the most important part for me but KGM does not
seem to understand this and this is upsetting me even more, the insurance I
took out with KGM has turned into a nightmare and I don't know when this is
going to end and they are going to deal with this matter so I can clear my
name with DVLA and the courts. I am forwarding you all the emails I am sending so you can see what is
going on and keep updated. As you can see, I am not getting very far with the
information I need to clear my name with the courts and DVLA. If KGM fail to
comply with the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 and
give me the information I need within 7 days I will be putting it in your
hands to deal with all of the matters as this has been going on long enough. 333, Regards Simon Cordell From: Complaints mailto: complaints@llovds.com Sent: 22
January 2015 12:08 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Notification Case No 8079/2014 -
MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, Thank you for your emails. I note that you have been liaising with Canopius in regard to your
complaint and from the correspondence we have on file that it is your
intention to go to court. Lloyd's complaints procedure is to offer policyholders the option for
a review by Lloyd's, should they remain dissatisfied with the way in which
their complaint has been handled. This is an independent review by a case
officer at Lloyd's. However please note once a complaint becomes the subject
of a court case Lloyd's can take no further action and we would have to cease
our investigation. Therefore, please can you confirm whether you are providing these
emails for information only or whether you wish Lloyd's to review your case
in place of potential court proceedings. Kind regards Cheryl Mrs Cheryl Shannon Case Officer Complaints Lloyd's Telephone +44 (0)1634 39 5693 www.lloyds.com SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 22:53 To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Cc: Complaints Subject: FW:
MT3574694 Dear Andrew Please see attached Insurance, which will show you full details of his
insurance policy and dates covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can be sorted out by the
court and I can send the information over to the CPS for the case of the
14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools in my van to void my
insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and Jessica know fully what
went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call from the police officer.
After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my policy and she
was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and she was the one that 334, believed the police until I went to the police
compound and spoke to the manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I
had not done this Kelly Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance
and I have all the emails to prove this. After Kelly Tiller found out I was not lying
about having no tools in my van the insurance policy was kept in place, I did
ask Kelly Tiller on more than once to send me the information and put data
requests in which was not replied to. Now I have been found guilty when Kelly
Tiller knows the truth that there was not tools and the police officer lied
to KGM on the phone call. I am the one that has suffered over all this not
just on this case but all the times I have been taken to court for no
insurance over the year my policy run with KGM due to it not showing on the
MID database. You should have all the emails already from
Broadsure Direct and many was sent by them to KGM as I was told KGM could not
talk to me and I had to deal with Broadsure Direct about my policy Martin
Jenkins from Broadsure Direct should also have copies of all emails as I do. I have spoken to DVLA today and asked for the
data of how many times points was put on my licence due to not getting
summons from police and then dealing with cases I knew nothing about and then
I had to get the cases reopened, I have to write them a letter and they will
send the data I have asked for in the post. I do have a lot of letters which I will sort out
scan and send over. But the 1st part I want to deal with is the court case I
was found guilty at and have put an appeal in that is the most important to
me right now. We can deal with everything else once I get all
the data scanned as there is really a lot and it was all due to KGM not
sorting out why my insurance was not showing on the MID database. The seizers
alone have left me out of pocket by around £1700.00. That is without all the
days I have not been able to work due to my driving licence being messed up
and showing points for no insurance. All the time going back and forward to
the compound to collect my vehicles, and everything else I have had to deal
with the courts when in fact I had done nothing wrong. I have tried to deal with this for months and
months without going to the ombudsman and KGM has taken no notice, it has
taken me to go to the ombudsman for KGM to take any notice and I don’t feel
anyone would be happy with this sort of service from KGM let alone any
company doing this and causing someone so much suffering. It was one of the police in the end at the
compound who in the end worked out why it was not showing up on the MID and
that was because there had been a space put within my Reg Numbers. It was that
bad two police compounds new me and said each time not again. As you can see, I am not very happy about all of
this, but I do not think anyone would be when they paid for their insurance
and had done nothing wrong to suffer all this. Therefore, could you please get the information I
need to send to the CPS; I have written what was needed from Nov 2014 and way
before this, and it still has not been sent and I have this hanging over my
head. I did not just get points on my licence I got disqualified from driving
for 6 months due to repeat offending of no insurance please tell me why when
I have paid for my insurance from KGM? The reason it has not been enforced is
due to me putting an appeal in. You can contact my mother on 0208 245 7454 or
07961 833021 Regards Simon Cordell 335, From: Austin, Andrew mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Sent: 21 January 2015 16:13 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, I have detailed the process for requesting information under the
subject access request and if you wish to proceed with this please confirm. In the meantime, I am keen to assist you if I can in confirming when
cover was in force. Please can you confirm if there is a contact number, I can call you or
your Mother on and a time that is acceptable so that I can try and help
resolve this particular issue for you. I look forward to hearing from you with this information. Regards, Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of
the UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close |
London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 | M 07469
147743 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Andrew I will forward this to you within a few days I
will ask the police compound to do a full print out as to all the tickets as
I believe there is a few missing. I do have around 6 of the tickets here when the
vehicles were sized, I also do have court letters, and letters from DVLA,
which I will forward over to you once I have scanned then in so please give
me a few days and I will get back to you with this information as there is a
lot of data. The main one at this time I am worried about is
the case where the vehicle was sized due to the police lying and me being
found guilty at court you did have an email on the 30 November 2014 about
what was needed and I do have the court letter showing I was found guilty and
about the appeal. This data should have been given under the
Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 I put in, so was
wondering what you can do about this and if you will need a new Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in
so to do a 4th I do not feel I should need to do. KGM have in fact did not follow the protocol for
the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 which has been
put in 3 times already to KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information
Commissioner’s Office as I do not see any reason you would have to stop the
information, I have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact
guilty of no insurance. And now say to deal with this you need
information from me. I can understand you want the information for the
complaint that has been put in, but not the information I asked for to show I
was in fact I was insured for an appeal that is ongoing. And in fact, would
not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under the Data Protection
Act 1998 as I would not have been found guilty. 336, I would like the data sent to the court as soon
as possible in regard to this so they can look at the facts and see if fact I
was insured so there should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more
of my time wasted going to court. Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell Thank you for your email. My letter dated 22/12/14 requests the following documentary evidence
from you With regards to any losses that may have been incurred as a result of
the above, I confirm as detailed in my previous letter, I require the
following: - Confirmation of the points you raised to the Financial Ombudsman when
you verbally submitted your complaint and the outcome you are looking to
achieve. Full details of the losses that you have incurred as a direct result
of your complaint and full documentary evidence supporting this. Confirmation of dates of any convictions or costs imposed directly as
a result of your complaint, including full documentary evidence supporting
this. Once I receive all of the above, I will be happy to consider this
further. With regards to your subject access request. My letter of the 9/12/14
advised the following: - Following our initial investigations, we note that you submitted a
subject access request to your Broker. Should you wish to proceed with this,
please can you formally request this in writing to our Data Protection
Officer at the address detailed at the foot of the letter including a cheque
payable to KGM Insurance for the sum of £10.00. Alternatively, you may wish
to wait until our full investigations have been finalised. Can you please confirm how you wish to proceed with that request? Should you not be in receipt of any of the letters I refer to advise
me above, please and I will ensure copies are sent to you immediately. I await your reply Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of
the UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close |
London | E18 1RZ From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31 To: Austin, Andrew 337, Subject: RE: MT3574694 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing due to the complaint I put in. I
have forwarded emails to Broadsure Direct and spoken to Broadsure Direct who
took the policy of insurance out policy no: MT3574694 I have been asking for information from KGM since
2013 and have heard nothing back. When the policy was taken out there was some
reason it did not show up on the MID database Broadsure Direct and KGM was
aware of this. Due to this fact I had my vehicles were sized a
number of times I believe 8 or 9 times in all, where I had to pay the costs
to get my vehicles out the compound each time. In the week when I was pulled
by police it was not so bad as the insurance company was opened so when I
showed the police my policy, they could call the insurance company. The seizers happened mostly at the weekend mostly
due to the insurance company being closed and the police could not talk to
anyone even when I had my policy on me at all times to prove I did in fact
have insurance. I made many calls to the police, Broadsure
Direct, KGM and the people who run the MID database, but the issue did not go
away, and my vehicles still did not show up on the MID database. There was also a time in Nov 2013 when my van was
sized this was due to KGM telling the police I was not insured due to the
police telling KGM that I had tools in my van. Which was a lie by the police
as I did not have anything in my van. Kelly Tiller from the trade section was
dealing with this and a few days later I got a letter from KGM saying they
was going to cancel my policy. As you can understand I was very upset over
this as I had done nothing wrong. At this time lots of calls was both made to KMG
and Broadsure to stop the cancelation of my insurance policy, I spoke to
Kelly Tiller many times, but she believed the police and I had no say in the
matter. The police were off duty so I could not speak to them and Kelly
Tiller was saying unless I could prove I did not have any tools in my van
then the insurance policy would be cancelled which was very unfair as I had
done nothing wrong, I knew I never had any tools. But I also asked Kelly Tiller did the police tell
her what tools was meant to be in my van, to which she said no. KGM was not
even aware I had mechanics trade on my policy so if my mechanics tools had
been in my van at the time my insurance would still have been cancelled which
to me what was the point in having insurance? I then spoke to a wonderful operator at the police
when I called told her what had gone on and was told by her to go to the
police compound as when any vehicles are taken there, they have to do a full
list of items that are in the vehicles as they are in fact legible if
something goes missing. Over that weekend I sent emails to the compound and
forwarded them to Broadsure as my insurance was due to be cancelled on the
Monday. On Monday I got an email from Broadsure direct asking me to go to the
compound as Kelly Tiller had no luck getting a reply from them also, and once
there to call Kelly Tiller due to the time on the Monday I got the email it
would have been too late to go the compound and get a call to Kelly Tiller as
she would have ended work for that day so I sent an email saying I would be
going there early the next morning. I went the next day and asked to speak to the
manager of the compound who in fact looked up my van and said nothing was in
there, there was not tools I called Kelly Tiller and the manager of the
compound spoke to her and confirmed there was nothing in the van when it was
taken there by police and that I had put thing in the van when I had taken it
out of the compound. At this point Kelly tiller believed me and said
the policy would not be cancelled. But on my way back from the compound
driving 338, my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and it
was Broadsure direct saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was very
upset at this and told them what had happened, I was asked to hold on they
was called KGM back and would call me right back. I waited till Broadsure
direct called me back and confirmed my insurance policy had not been
cancelled then drove home. From this point I have been asking for all
information and putting data protection acts in which have not been dealt
with and I have heard nothing from KGM. I have been back and forward to court due to no
insurance and in fact 4 cases I did not get any summons so was in fact found
guilty as I did not know it was even going to court. I have had points put on my driving licence for
no reason and had to go back and forward to court many times when this should
not have been the case. Then the case come up for the seizer when the
police said I had tools in my van I went to court with all my documents but
due to not having the information I had asked for from KGM many times about
that case I was found guilty. I am very upset about the whole policy with
KGM. I have put an appeal in, and this case will be going to crown court I
have again asked for information and again heard nothing. These matters need
to be addressed as I am suffering due to all of this. Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows
everything that has gone on as he was my main contact. I also have all the emails the last one that I
will enclose again, which I have heard nothing about and the 1st Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the
26/11/2013. I did in fact send the Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998 about time times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into
why I had heard nothing about more than once. Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I
will ask the court to summons the people at KGM to deal with this matter as
they know I was insurance and did nothing wrong and the police lied. All I
have asked for is the data so there will be no need to summons people this
way I can send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown and the
other information and this case should be dropped against me. It just seemed that KGM does not want to do
anything and give me the information I need to prove in fact I was insurance
and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it that I was not insurance. There is a lot more I could say about the
insurance I had with KGM, but this insurance policy was my worst nightmare.
It has messed my clean driving licence up and in fact got to the point I
could not drive so could not work. Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the
information over that was needed to prove I did have insurance. If you need o can send over all the emails that
has been sent back and forward to Broadsure who sent them to KGM. I have lost a lot of money, and time due to this
insurance policy I have had to pay for my vehicles to be taken out of the
police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost of £180.00 to £200.00 a time.
All the loss of work due to having to take time to go to the police compound,
and all the times I have had to go to court for no insurance when in fact I
had insurance. And points put on my driving licence to the fact I could not
drive, this has all been costs to myself. My Mother Lorraine Cordell has also written many
of the emails and is fine with dealing with this issue. Regards Simon Cordell 339, Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited 340, Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in
England and Wales The information in this E-Mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. You should NOT
retain, copy, or use this E-mail for any purpose, nor disclose all or any
part of its contents to any other person or persons. Any views expressed in this message are those of
the individual sender, EXCEPT where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Lloyd's. Lloyd's may monitor the content of E-mails sent
and received via its network for viruses or unauthorised use and for other
lawful business purposes. Lloyd's is authorised under the Financial
Services and Markets Act 2000 The information in this E-Mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged. If you are NOT the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. You should NOT
retain, copy, or use this E-mail for any purpose, nor disclose all or any
part of its contents to any other person or persons. Any views expressed in this message are those of
the individual sender, EXCEPT where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Lloyd's. Lloyd's may monitor the content of E-mails sent
and received via its network for viruses or unauthorised use and for other
lawful business purposes. Lloyd's is authorised under the Financial
Services and Markets Act 2000 341, RE: Notification Case No
8079/2014 - MT3574fp9agfnfJri°fti0n we need.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 30 November 2014 14:47 To: ’Martin Jenkin’ Subject: RE: REF: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<80> Open Attach Documents Hi Martin Thank you for getting back to me about this matter, and for you
contacting KGM and getting this addressed, please see the below information
that will be needed. We will also still need the section 9 witness statement
from you. The below section is what will be needed from KGM. Section 9 witness statement from: 1. Jessica about the call that she took, from the
police officer who called KGM after Simon Cordell was stopped on the
14/11/2013. This statement will include what was said on the phone call by
the police officer and what Jessica said to the police officer this would
also include what sort of tools the police officer said there was in the van.
Any other information as to the date of the 14/11/2013 and after this date as
to any dealing Jessica had with the stop on the 14/11/2013. 2. Copy of all phone recordings between the police
officer, and Jessica on the date of 14/11/2013. 3. All phone recordings of any calls that were made,
to KGM from Simon Cordell or Lorraine Cordell to try to stop his insurance
policy being cancelled and to address the stop that was made on the
14/11/2013. 4. The phone recording of when Kelly Tiller had
asked Simon Cordell to go to the police compound and get someone from the
compound to call Kelly Tiller about the list of tools that was meant to have
been in the van when the police stopped Mr |Simon Cordell on the 14/11/2013.
I believe Simon Cordell went to the police compound on the 26/11/2013 and
this is where the manager of the compound and Simon Cordell spoke to called
Kelly Tiller and confirmed there was in fact no tools in the van. 5. Copies of all emails that were sent from KGM to
Broadsure and Broadsure to KGM with regard to the police stop of Simon
Cordell on the 14/11/2013. This would include all emails of dates after the
14/11/2014 when Simon Cordell was trying to stop his insurance policy from
being cancelled and was trying to address this matter of what the police had
said about there being tools in his Van which was why the insurance policy
was going to be cancelled. Section 9 witness statement from: 6. Kelly Tiller as to any dealing she had with the
police stop on Simon Cordell on the 14/11/2013. This would include all
dealing with Broadsure about this matter and any calls that was made to her
by Simon Cordell and Lorraine Cordell, and any calls Kelly Tiller made about
this matter about the cancellation of the policy and the stop by the police
on the 14/11/2014 until this issue was addressed. 7. This would also include all details of the call
that was made by the police compound to Kelly Tiller on the 26/11/2013 to
prove there were no tools in the van. Which in turn stopped the cancelation
of the insurance policy as I believe the reason for the cancellation was due
to Kelly Tiller saying he had voided his insurance due to there being tools
in the van. 8. Full details as to why the insurance policy was
going to be cancelled and what Mr Simon Cordell was meant to have done wrong
which would have in fact made his insurance policy void. file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 342, Page 2 of 3 · Full details as to why in the end the insurance
policy was not cancelled and the reasons for not cancelling which was due to
Mr Simon Cordell going to the police compound and the police compound
confirming to Kelly Tiller over the phone there was in fact no tools in the
van. · The reason why until Jan 2014 that Mr Simon
Cordell’s insurance did not show up on the MID database. · Confirmation Simon Cordell did have insurance to
drive on the 14/11/2014 and did not void his insurance in any way. · Why Kelly Tiller did not deal with all the data
protection requests that had been submitted to KGM, under the data protection
act 1998 subject access request, as if this had been done Simon Cordell would
not be in the court system for this case. Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [mailto: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 28 November 2014 14:36 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: REF: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<80>
Open Attach Documents Lorraine, I have spoken to the manager at KGM and he has advised Andy Austin is
detailing with the case. They have asked for a clear email for me to send to them of your
requirements. Please could you email what is required for me to forward on! (unfortunately, Kelly is on annual leave at present) Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 Broadsure Direct - Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax
Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e-mail in file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 343, Page 3 of 3 error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the
message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor
e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
47. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 47 Peter.Wood@canopius.com_01.23.2015_FW FW MT3574694 23/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 344,345,346,347,348 349,350,351,352,353,354 355,356,357,358,359,360 “The Files below got
moved from 22/01/2015 to here!” 1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 425. Wood, Peter _Fwd._
FW_ MT3574694 / Page Numbers: 1315,1316,1317,1318,1319,1320, 1321,1322,1323,1324,1325,1326,1327 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
23/01/2015 |
17:19:00 |
X17 344 345,346,347,348 349,350,351,352 353,354,355,356 357,358,359,360 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
47. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 47 Peter.Wood@canopius.com_01.23.2015_FW FW MT3574694 23/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 344,345,346,347,348 349,350,351,352,353,354 355,356,357,358,359,360 -- 344, From: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Sent: 23 January 2015
17:19 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694 Attachments: S Cordell Cert._
KGM_ 2013-2014_Colour.pdf Information we
need.pdf Dear Mr Cordell, Ø Unfortunately, Andy
has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have picked
this matter up. Ø The first order of
business to my mind is dealing with the Court case, can you confirm when the
date has been set for the hearing please? Ø My thought is that
we provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically confirms that you had a valid
policy in force between said dates and on what vehicles, this should satisfy
the Courts but if they need anything else, we will be happy to assist, just
let me know what you require. Ø I understand you
were stopped several times and had vehicles seized, you are in the process of
obtaining evidence of these vehicle seizures and the costs incurred by you as
a result for us to consider compensation. Ø When you have
gathered this please forward the evidence to us as soon as possible. Ø There is also the
matter of your Data Subject Access Request. Ø I have spent some
time today tracking down recorded calls and various communications and hove
notified our Data Protection Officer of your request. Ø I can see that you
have made a request, any request should correctly be sent on for the
attention of the Data Protection Officer along with a £10 fee. Ø Your request was
addressed generally to KGM with no fee and it would appear not actioned. Ø The underwriter
dealing with your request should have asked immediately for the fee payment
and escalated your request accordingly. Ø This was not done
for which I must apologise, as a result we will waive the fee requirement and
I would confirm this is now in hand. Ø We have yet to
issue a final response to your complaint and I would assure you we will do
this as soon as we have received your response to the above points. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty
Operations Manager | UK Specialty
Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14
Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530
9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Subject: FW: MT3574694 Dear Andrew Please see attached Insurance, which will show
you full details of his insurance policy and dates covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can
be sorted out by the court 345, and I can send the information over to the CPS
for the case of the 14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools
in my van to void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and
Jessica know fully what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call
from the police officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing
with my policy and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and
she was the one that believed the police until I went to the police compound
and spoke to the manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not
done this Kelly Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have
all the emails to prove this. After Kelly Tiller found out I was not lying
about having no tools in my van the insurance policy was kept in place, I did
ask Kelly Tiller on more than once to send me the information and put data
requests in which was not replied to. Now I have been found guilty when Kelly
Tiller knows the truth that there was not tools and the police officer lied
to KGM on the phone call. I am the one that has suffered over all this not
just on this case but all the times I have been taken to court for no
insurance over the year my policy run with KGM due to it not showing on the
MID database. You should have all the emails already from
Broadsure Direct and many was sent by them to KGM as I was told KGM could not
talk to me and I had to deal with Broadsure Direct about my policy Martin
Jenkins from Broadsure Direct should also have copies of all emails as I do. I have spoken to DVLA today and asked for the
data of how many times points was put on my licence due to not getting
summons from police and then dealing with cases I knew nothing about and then
I had to get the cases reopened, I have to write them a letter and they will
send the data I have asked for in the post. I do have a lot of letters which I will sort out
scan and send over. But the 1st part I want to deal with is the court case I
was found guilty at and have put an appeal in that is the most important to
me right now. We can deal with everything else once I get all
the data scanned as there is really a lot and it was all due to KGM not
sorting out why my insurance was not showing on the MID database. The seizers
alone have left me out of pocket by around £1700.00. That is without all the
days I have not been able to work due to my driving licence being messed up
and showing points for no insurance. All the time going back and forward to
the compound to collect me 346, vehicles, and everything else I have had to deal
with the courts when in fact I had done nothing wrong. I have tried to deal with this for months and
months without going to the ombudsman and KGM has taken no notice, it has
taken me to go to the ombudsman for KGM to take any notice and I don't feel
anyone would be happy with this sort of service from KGM let alone any
company doing this and causing someone so much suffering. It was one of the police in the end at the
compound who in the end worked out why it was not showing up on the MID and
that was because there had been a space put within my Reg Numbers. It was
that bad two police compounds new me and said each time not again. As you can see, I am not very happy about all of
this, but I do not think anyone would be when they paid for their insurance
and had done nothing wrong to suffer all this. Therefore, could you please get the information I
need to send to the CPS; I have written what was needed from Nov 2014 and way
before this, and it still has not been sent and I have this hanging over my
head. I did not just get points on my licence I got disqualified from driving
for 6 months due to repeat offending of no insurance please tell me why when
I have paid for my insurance from KGM? The reason it has not been enforced is
due to me putting an appeal in. You can contact my mother on Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 16:13 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' 347, Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, I have detailed the process for requesting
information under the subject access request and if you wish to proceed with
this please confirm. In the meantime, I am keen to assist you if I can
in confirming when cover was in force. Please can you confirm if there is a contact
number, I can call you or your Mother on and a time that is acceptable so
that I can try and help resolve this particular issue for you. I look forward to hearing from you with this
information. Regards, Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM
Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 | M 07469 147743 | <http://www.kgminsurance.co.uk/> www.kgminsurance.co.uk | <http://www.canopius.com/> www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Andrew 348, I will forward this to you within a few days I
will ask the police compound to do a full print out as to all the tickets as
I believe there is a few missing. I do have around 6 of the tickets here when the
vehicles were sized, I also do have court letters, and letters from DVLA,
which I will forward over to you once I have scanned then in so please give
me a few days and I will get back to you with this information as there is a
lot of data. The main one at this time I am worried about is the
case where the vehicle was sized due to the police lying and me being found
guilty at court you did have an email on the 30 November 2014 about what was
needed and I do have the court letter showing I was found guilty and about
the appeal. This data should have been given under the
Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 I put in, so was
wondering what you can do about this and if you will need a new Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in so
to do a 4th I do not feel I should need to do. KGM have in fact did not follow the protocol for
the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 which has been
put in 3 times already to KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information
Commissioner's Office as I do not see any reason you would have to stop the
information, I have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact
guilty of no insurance. And now say to deal with this you need
information from me. I can understand you want the information for the
complaint that has been put in, but not the information I asked for to show I
was in fact I was insured for an appeal that is ongoing. And in fact, would
not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under the Data Protection
Act 1998 as I would not have been found guilty. I would like the data sent to the court as soon
as possible in regard to this so they can look at the facts and see if fact I
was insured so there should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more
of my time wasted going to court. Regards 349, Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell Thank you for your email. My letter dated 22/12/14 requests the following
documentary evidence from you With regards to any losses that may have been
incurred as a result of the above, I confirm as detailed in my previous
letter, I require the following: - · Confirmation of the points you raised to the
Financial Ombudsman when you verbally submitted your complaint and
the outcome you are looking to achieve. · Full details of the losses that you have incurred
as a direct result of your complaint and full documentary evidence supporting
this. · Confirmation of dates of any convictions or costs
imposed directly as a result of your complaint, including full documentary
evidence supporting this. Once I receive all of the above, I will be happy
to consider this further. With regards to your subject access request. My
letter of the 9/12/14 advised the following: - Following our initial investigations, we note
that you submitted a subject 350, access request to your Broker. Should you wish to
proceed with this, please can you formally request this in writing to our
Data Protection Officer at the address detailed at the foot of the letter
including a cheque payable to KGM Insurance for the sum of £10.00.
Alternatively, you may wish to wait until our full investigations have been
finalised. Can you please confirm how you wish to proceed
with that request? Should you not be in receipt of any of the
letters I refer to advise me above, please and I will ensure copies are sent
to you immediately. I await your reply Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM
Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing due to the complaint I put in. I
have forwarded emails to Broadsure Direct and spoken to Broadsure Direct who
took the policy of insurance out policy no: MT3574694 I have been asking for information from KGM since
2013 and have heard nothing back. 351, When the policy was taken out there was some
reason it did not show up on the MID database Broadsure Direct and KGM was
aware of this. Due to this fact I had my vehicles were sized a
number of times I believe 8 or 9 times in all, where I had to pay the costs
to get my vehicles out the compound each time. In the week when I was pulled
by police it was not so bad as the insurance company was opened so when I
showed the police my policy, they could call the insurance company. The seizers happened mostly at the weekend mostly
due to the insurance company being closed and the police could not talk to
anyone even when I had my policy on me at all times to prove I did in fact
have insurance. I made many calls to the police, Broadsure
Direct, KGM and the people who run the MID database, but the issue did not go
away, and my vehicles still did not show up on the MID database. There was also a time in Nov 2013 when my van was
sized this was due to KGM telling the police I was not insured due to the
police telling KGM that I had tools in my van. Which was a lie by the police
as I did not have anything in my van. Kelly Tiller from the trade section was
dealing with this and a few days later I got a letter from KGM saying they
was going to cancel my policy. As you can understand I was very upset over
this as I had done nothing wrong. At this time lots of calls was both made to KMG
and Broadsure to stop the cancelation of my insurance policy, I spoke to
Kelly Tiller many times, but she believed the police and I had no say in the
matter. The police were off duty so I could not speak to them and Kelly
Tiller was saying unless I could prove I did not have any tools in my van
then the insurance policy would be cancelled which was very unfair as I had
done nothing wrong, I knew I never had any tools. But I also asked Kelly Tiller did the police tell
her what tools was meant to be in my van, to which she said no. KGM was not even
aware I had mechanics trade on my policy so if my mechanics tools had been in
my van at the time my insurance would still have been cancelled which to me
what was the point in having insurance? I then spoke to a wonderful operator at the
police when I called told her what had gone on and was told by her to go to
the police compound as when 352, any vehicles are taken there they have to do a
full list of items that are in the vehicles as they are in fact legible if
something goes missing. Over that weekend I sent emails to the compound and
forwarded them to Broadsure as my insurance was due to be cancelled on the
Monday. On Monday I got an email from Broadsure direct asking me to go to the
compound as Kelly Tiller had no luck getting a reply from them also, and once
there to call Kelly Tiller due to the time on the Monday I got the email it
would have been too late to go the compound and get a call to Kelly Tiller as
she would have ended work for that day so I sent an email saying I would be
going there early the next morning. I went the next day and asked to speak to the
manager of the compound who in fact looked up my van and said nothing was in
there, there was not tools I called Kelly Tiller and the manager of the
compound spoke to her and confirmed there was nothing in the van when it was
taken there by police and that I had put thing in the van when I had taken it
out of the compound. At this point Kelly tiller believed me and said
the policy would not be cancelled. But on my way back from the compound
driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and it was Broadsure direct
saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was very upset at this and told
them what had happened, I was asked to hold on they was called KGM back and
would call me right back. I waited till Broadsure direct called me back and
confirmed my insurance policy had not been cancelled then drove home. From this point I have been asking for all
information and putting data protection acts in which have not been dealt
with and I have heard nothing from KGM. I have been back and forward to court due to no
insurance and in fact 4 cases I did not get any summons so was in fact found
guilty as I did not know it was even going to court. I have had points put on my driving licence for
no reason and had to go back and forward to court many times when this should
not have been the case. Then the case come up for the seizer when the
police said I had tools in my van I went to court with all my documents but
due to not having the information I had asked for from KGM many times about
that case I was found guilty. I am very upset about the whole policy with
KGM. I have put an appeal in, and this case will be going to crown court I
have again asked for 353, information and again heard nothing. These
matters need to be addressed as I am suffering due to all of this. Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows
everything that has gone on as he was my main contact. I also have all the emails the last one that I
will enclose again, which I have heard nothing about and the 1st Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the
26/11/2013. I did in fact send the Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998 about time times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into
why I had heard nothing about more than once. Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I
will ask the court to summons the people at KGM to deal with this matter as
they know I was insurance and did nothing wrong and the police lied. All I
have asked for is the data so there will be no need to summons people this
way I can send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown and the
other information and this case should be dropped against me. It just seemed that KGM does not want to do
anything and give me the information I need to prove in fact I was insurance
and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it that I was not insurance. There is a lot more I could say about the
insurance I had with KGM, but this insurance policy was my worst nightmare.
It has messed my clean driving licence up and in fact got to the point I
could not drive so could not work. Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the
information over that was needed to prove I did have insurance. If you need o can send over all the emails that
has been sent back and forward to Broadsure who sent them to KGM. I have lost a lot of money, and time due to this
insurance policy I have had to pay for my vehicles to be taken out of the
police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost of £180.00 to £200.00 a time.
All the loss of work due to having to take time to go to the police compound,
and all the times I have had to go to court for no insurance when in fact I
had insurance. And points put on my driving licence to the fact I could not
drive, this has all been costs to myself. 354, My Mother Lorraine Cordell has also written many
of the emails and is fine with dealing with this issue. Regards Simon Cordell 355, Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents
Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number
02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA |
Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents
Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number
02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA |
Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the
content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents 356, Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number
02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One
Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales 357,
End of Picture! 358, FW: FW: MT35746 - On we need.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 30 November 2014 14:47 To: ’Martin Jenkin’ Subject: RE: REF: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<80> Open Attach Documents Hi Martin Thank you for getting back to me about this matter, and for you
contacting KGM and getting this addressed, please see the below information that
will be needed. We will also still need the section 9 witness statement from
you. The below section is what will be needed from KGM. Section 9 witness
statement from: 1. Jessica about the call that she took, from the
police officer who called KGM after Simon Cordell was stopped on the
14/11/2013. This statement will include what was said on the phone call by
the police officer and what Jessica said to the police officer this would
also include what sort of tools the police officer said there was in the van.
Any other information as to the date of the 14/11/2013 and after this date as
to any dealing Jessica had with the stop on the 14/11/2013. 2. Copy of all phone recordings between the police officer,
and Jessica on the date of 14/11/2013. 3. All phone recordings of any calls that were made,
to KGM from Simon Cordell or Lorraine Cordell to try to stop his insurance
policy being cancelled and to address the stop that was made on the
14/11/2013. 4. The phone recording of when Kelly Tiller had
asked Simon Cordell to go to the police compound and get someone from the
compound to call Kelly Tiller about the list of tools that was meant to have
been in the van when the police stopped Mr |Simon Cordell on the 14/11/2013.
I believe Simon Cordell went to the police compound on the 26/11/2013 and
this is where the manager of the compound and Simon Cordell spoke to called
Kelly Tiller and confirmed there was in fact no tools in the van. 5. Copies of all emails that were sent from KGM to
Broadsure and Broadsure to KGM with regard to the police stop of Simon
Cordell on the 14/11/2013. This would include all emails of dates after the
14/11/2014 when Simon Cordell was trying to stop his insurance policy from
being cancelled and was trying to address this matter of what the police had
said about there being tools in his Van which was why the insurance policy
was going to be cancelled. Section 9 witness
statement from: 6. Kelly Tiller as to any dealing she had with the
police stop on Simon Cordell on the 14/11/2013. This would include all
dealing with Broadsure about this matter and any calls that was made to her
by Simon Cordell and Lorraine Cordell, and any calls Kelly Tiller made about
this matter about the cancellation of the policy and the stop by the police
on the 14/11/2014 until this issue was addressed. 7. This would also include all details of the call
that was made by the police compound to Kelly Tiller on the 26/11/2013 to
prove there were no tools in the van. Which in turn stopped the cancelation
of the insurance policy as I believe the reason for the cancellation was due
to Kelly Tiller saying he had voided his insurance due to there being tools
in the van. 8. Full details as to why the insurance policy was
going to be cancelled and what Mr Simon Cordell was meant to have done wrong
which would have in fact made his insurance policy void. file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 359, Page 2 of 3 · Full details as to why in the end the insurance
policy was not cancelled and the reasons for not cancelling which was due to
Mr Simon Cordell going to the police compound and the police compound
confirming to Kelly Tiller over the phone there was in fact no tools in the
van. · The reason why until Jan 2014 that Mr Simon
Cordell’s insurance did not show up on the MID database. · Confirmation Simon Cordell did have insurance to
drive on the 14/11/2014 and did not void his insurance in any way. · Why Kelly Tiller did not deal with all the data
protection requests that had been submitted to KGM, under the data protection
act 1998 subject access request, as if this had been done Simon Cordell would
not be in the court system for this case. Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin mailto: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 28 November 2014 14:36 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: REF:
00-COSX14MT07-ID<80> Open Attach Documents Lorraine, I have spoken to the manager at KGM and he has advised Andy Austin is
detailing with the case. They have asked for a clear email for me to send to them of your
requirements. Please could you email what is required for me to forward on! (unfortunately, Kelly is on annual leave at present) Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 Broadsure Direct - Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax
Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e-mail in file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 360, Page 3 of 3 error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the
message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor
e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3815cbf28add435d9773bab08ca... 21/01/2015 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 425. Wood, Peter _Fwd._ FW_ MT3574694 / Page Numbers: 1315,1316,1317,1318,1319,1320,1321,1322,1323,1324,1325,1326,1327, From: Wood, Peter [Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694 Attachments: S Cordell Cert. _ KGM_ 20132014_Colour.pdf;
Information we need.pdf Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
Unfortunately,
Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have
picked this matter up. Ø
The
first order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case, can you
confirm when the date has been set for the hearing please? Ø
My
thought is that we provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically confirms that
you had a valid policy in force between said dates and on what vehicles, this
should satisfy the Courts but if they need anything else, we will be happy to
assist, just let me know what you require. Ø
I
understand you were stopped several times and had vehicles seized, you are in
the process of obtaining evidence of these vehicle seizures and the costs
incurred by you as a result for us to consider compensation. Ø
When
you have gathered this please forward the evidence to us as soon as possible. Ø
There
is also the matter of your Data Subject Access Request. Ø
I
have spent some time today tracking down recorded calls and various
communications and hove notified our Data Protection Officer of your request.
Ø
I
can see that you have made a request, any request should correctly be sent on
for the attention of the Data Protection Officer along with a £10 fee. Ø
Your
request was addressed generally to KGM with no fee and it would appear not
actioned. Ø
The
underwriter dealing with your request should have asked immediately for the
fee payment and escalated your request accordingly. Ø
This
was not done for which I must apologise, as a result we will waive the fee
requirement and I would confirm this is now in hand. Ø
We
have yet to issue a final response to your complaint and I would assure you
we will do this as soon as we have received your response to the above
points. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com <Andrew.Austin@canopius.com> Subject: FW: MT3574694 Dear Andrew Please see attached
Insurance, which will show you full details of his 1316, insurance policy and
dates covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can be sorted out
by the court and I can send the information over to the CPS for the case of
the 14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools in my van
to void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and Jessica know
fully what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call from the
police officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my
policy and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and she was
the one that believed the police until I went to the police compound and
spoke to the manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not done
this Kelly Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have all
the emails to prove this. After Kelly Tiller found out I was not lying about
having no tools in my van the insurance policy was kept in place, I did ask
Kelly Tiller on more than once to send me the information and put data
requests in which was not replied to. Now I have been found guilty when Kelly
Tiller knows the truth that there was not tools and the police officer lied
to KGM on the phone call. I am the one that has suffered over all this not
just on this case but all the times I have been taken to court for no
insurance over the year my policy run with KGM due to it not showing on the
MID database. You should have all the emails already from Broadsure Direct
and many was sent by them to KGM as I was told KGM could not talk to me and I
had to deal with Broadsure Direct about my policy Martin Jenkins from
Broadsure Direct should also have copies of all emails as I do. I have spoken
to DVLA today and asked for the data of how many times points was put on my
licence due to not getting summons from police and then dealing with cases I
knew nothing about and then I had to get the cases reopened, I have to write
them a letter and they will send the data I have asked for in the post. I do
have a lot of letters which I will sort out scan and send over. But the 1st
part I want to deal with is the court case I was found guilty at and have put 1317, We can deal with
everything else once I get all the data scanned as there is really a lot and
it was all due to KGM not sorting out why my insurance was not showing on the
MID database. The seizers alone have left me out of pocket by around
£1700.00. That is without all the days I have not been able to work due to my
driving licence being messed up and showing points for no insurance. All the
time going back and forward to the compound to collect my vehicles, and
everything else I have had to deal with the courts when in fact I had done
nothing wrong. I have tried to deal with this for months and months without
going to the ombudsman and KGM has taken no notice, it has taken me to go to
the ombudsman for KGM to take any notice and I don’t feel anyone would be
happy with this sort of service from KGM let alone any company doing this and
causing someone so much suffering. It was one of the police in the end at the
compound who in the end worked out why it was not showing up on the MID and
that was because there had been a space put within my Reg Numbers. It was
that bad two police compounds new me and said each time not again. As you can
see, I am not very happy about all of this but I do not think anyone would be
when they paid for their insurance and had done nothing wrong to suffer all
this. Therefore, could you please get the information I need to send to the
CPS, I have written what was needed from Nov 2014 and way before this,
and it still has not been sent and I have this hanging over my head. I did
not just get points on my licence I got disqualified from driving for 6
months due to repeat offending of no insurance please tell me why when I have
paid for my insurance from KGM? The reason it has not been enforced is due to
me putting an appeal in. You can contact my mother on Regards Simon Cordell 1318, From: Austin, Andrew [Mail To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 16:13 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, I have detailed the
process for requesting information under the subject access request and if
you wish to proceed with this please confirm. In the meantime, I am keen to
assist you if I can in confirming when cover was in force. Please can you
confirm if there is a contact number, I can call you or your Mother on and a
time that is acceptable so that I can try and help resolve this particular
issue for you. I look forward to hearing from you with this information. Regards, Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting
Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division
of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0)
20 8530 1806 | M 07469 147743 | http://www.kgminsurance.co.uk http://www.canopius.com >
From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
21
January 2015 13:22 1319,1320,1321,1322,1323,1324,1325,1326,1327, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
24/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
25/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Willesden The Willesden one seems to have been reheard
at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing again he was found
guilty, but they put this case under a new case number looking at the letter so all
the documents that were sent before was not with the court file I would have
through. Appeal against conviction at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court The dates of conviction were
the 26/11/2014 Wimbledon magistrate’s court.
Appeal date is 05/03/2015 at 10:00 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court GLBRENTMCENQ 011403134612 North West and West London
Magistrates' Courts Administration Centre Sharon. Burns - Met Police Disrepair! The 2nd Curfew for the
Asbo Interim Order Condition’s got granted in Error! The banging at Me
Continued! 1 My Birthday! Family Stuff! 2 My 1st Asbo Response Bundle/ pub Book Issue: 1! DRIVING BAN /
TRANSCRIPT OF SUCCESSFUL APPEAL AGAINST NO INSURANCE
CONVICTION/ Page Numbers: 214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232, 233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245, 246,247,248 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 426. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell_ (5) / Page Numbers: 1328,1329,1330,1331,1332,1333,1334, 1335,1336,1337,1338,1339,1340,1341 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 427. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1342,1343,1344,1345,1346,1347,1348, 1349,1350,1351,1352,1353,1354,1355 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
26/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 My Birthday: -- Ø I had a court case
that was for No Insurance at Willesden that I did not know about. Ø When later I found
out I had got found guilty and 6 points were issued on my license and a £600
fine. Ø Many emails were
sent to get this case reopened and dealt with but no reply from the courts. Ø Took this case to
appeal as it seemed the only way to address this and won the decision. 2 My 1st Asbo
Response Bundle/ pub Book Issue: 1! DRIVING BAN /
TRANSCRIPT OF SUCCESSFUL APPEAL AGAINST NO INSURANCE
CONVICTION/ Page Numbers: 214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,223,224,225, 226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237, 238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248 -- 214,
215,
216,
1 217,
2 218,
3 219,
4 220,
5 221,
6 223,
7 224,
8 225,
9 226,
10 227,
12 228,
13 229,
230,
15 231,
16 232,
17 233,
18 234,
19 235,
20 236,
21 237,
23 239,
22 238,
23 239,
24 240, A
25 241,
26 242,
27 243,
28 244,
29 245,
30 246,
31 247,
32 248 A
33 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 426. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell_ (5) / Page Numbers: 1328,1329,1330,1331,1332,1333,1334, 1335,1336,1337,1338,1339,1340,1341, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 26 January 2015 23:06 To: 'Wood, Peter' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon
Cordell Dear Peter Wood Ø Thank you for picking this up and taking the
time to deal with this matter. Ø The date of the appeal I do not have yet. Ø I are waiting for this but the court and CPS
said if I get the information needed before the court date then it could be
sent to the court who found me guilty and the CPS and this would be linked to
the case and addressed. Ø In addition, there should be no need for the
appeal court case. Ø I am trying to do this so that a next day is
not got to be wasted of my time in court and getting to and from the court. Ø The day that the police officer pulled me and
told KGM that I had tools in my van, Ø which the police officer lied, and the police
officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is 14/11/2013. Ø I think due to what the police officer said in
court the CPS and judge would like to know the facts and what the police
officer said on that phone call to KGM. Ø In addition, when KGM spoke to the manager at
the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools, Ø I think the reason for this is the police
officer committed perjury in the court. Ø That is why they asked me to get proof that my
insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements as to what the police
officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, Ø in addition, the facts how KGM found out I had
in fact done nothing wrong and my insurance should not be cancelled. Ø However, if you think a Letter of Indemnity
would sort this matter out then if this could be done, Ø I would be very grateful, but could you
include in the letter only reason this has come about is due to what the
police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. Ø In addition, this is the reason KGM told the
police officer that I would not then be covered by the insurance policy I had
in force with them. Ø This should cover it I hope as I really did
nothing wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied to get my
insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound and they told her
there was no tools. Ø The vehicle registration I was driving on the 14/11/2010
was CX52JRZ, this registration was included on my insurance. Ø So, should have shown on the database along
with my car. Ø However, none showed up as being insured on
the MID database, this is what has caused me all the problems with the
police. Ø As already aware yes, I was stopped around 8
or 9 times and had vehicles seized. Ø I do have some of the some of them here
already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the vehicle out of the
compound for the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up on the 16/11/2013.
Ø I have the ones for the 08/04/2013,
29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 Ø I just need to get the receipts for the other
dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to no insurance
from the police compound. Ø As for the Data Subject Access Request, I am
most grateful that this is being addressed. Ø If I had known a fee was, needed I would have
paid that right away, but due to no one getting back to me about the ones
that were put in, I did not know a fee was needed. 1329, Regards Simon Cordell From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
Unfortunately,
Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have
picked this matter up. Ø
The
first order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case, can you
confirm when the date has been set for the hearing please? Ø
My
thought is that we provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically confirms that
you had a valid policy in force between said dates and on what vehicles, this
should satisfy the Courts but if they need anything else, we will be happy to
assist, just let me know what you require. Ø
I
understand you were stopped several times and had vehicles seized, you are in
the process of obtaining evidence of these vehicle seizures and the costs
incurred by you as a result for us to consider compensation. Ø
When
you have gathered this please forward the evidence to us as soon as possible. Ø
There
is also the matter of your Data Subject Access Request. Ø
I
have spent some time today tracking down recorded calls and various
communications and hove notified our Data Protection Officer of your request.
Ø
I
can see that you have made a request, any request should correctly be sent on
for the attention of the Data Protection Officer along with a £10 fee. Ø
Your
request was addressed generally to KGM with no fee and it would appear not
actioned. Ø
The
underwriter dealing with your request should have asked immediately for the
fee payment and escalated your request accordingly. Ø
This
was not done for which I must apologise, as a result we will waive the fee
requirement and I would confirm this is now in hand. Ø
We
have yet to issue a final response to your complaint and I would assure you
we will do this as soon as we have received your response to the above
points. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com <Andrew.Austin@canopius.com> Subject:
FW: 1330, Dear Andrew Please see attached
Insurance, which will show you full details of his insurance policy and dates
covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can be sorted out by
the court and I can send the information over to the CPS for the case of the
14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools in my van to
void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and Jessica know fully
what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call from the police
officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my policy
and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and she was the one
that believed the police until I went to the police compound and spoke to the
manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not done this Kelly
Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have all the emails
to prove this. After Kelly Tiller found out I was not lying about having no
tools in my van the insurance policy was kept in place, I did ask Kelly
Tiller on more than once to send me the information and put data requests in
which was not replied to. Now I have been found guilty when Kelly Tiller
knows the truth that there was not tools and the police officer lied to KGM
on the phone call. I am the one that has suffered over all this not just on
this case but all the times I have been taken to court for no insurance over
the year my policy run with KGM due to it not showing on the MID database.
You should have all the emails already from Broadsure Direct and many was
sent by them to KGM as I was told KGM could not talk to me and I had to deal
with Broadsure Direct about my policy Martin Jenkins from Broadsure Direct
should also have copies of all emails as I do. I have spoken to DVLA today
and asked for the data of how many times points was put on my licence due to
not getting summons from police and then dealing with cases I knew nothing
about and then I had to get the cases reopened, I have to write them a letter
and they will send the data I have asked for in the post. I do have a lot of
letters which I will sort out scan and send over. But the 1331, 1st part I want to deal
with is the court case I was found guilty at and have put an appeal in that
is the most important to me right now. We can deal with everything else once
I get all the data scanned as there is really a lot and it was all due to KGM
not sorting out why my insurance was not showing on the MID database. The
seizers alone have left me out of pocket by around £1700.00. That is without
all the days I have not been able to work due to my driving licence being
messed up and showing points for no insurance. All the time going back and
forward to the compound to collect my vehicles, and everything else I have
had to deal with the courts when in fact I had done nothing wrong. I have
tried to deal with this for months and months without going to the ombudsman
and KGM has taken no notice, it has taken me to go to the ombudsman for KGM
to take any notice and I don’t feel anyone would be happy with this sort of
service from KGM let alone any company doing this and causing someone so much
suffering. It was one of the police in the end at the compound who in the end
worked out why it was not showing up on the MID and that was because there
had been a space put within my Reg Numbers. It was that bad two police
compounds new me and said each time not again. As you can see, I am not very
happy about all of this but I do not think anyone would be when they paid for
their insurance and had done nothing wrong to suffer all this. Therefore,
could you please get the information I need to send to the CPS, I have
written what was needed from Nov 2014 and way before this, and it
still has not been sent and I have this hanging over my head. I did not just
get points on my licence I got disqualified from driving for 6 months due to
repeat offending of no insurance please tell me why when I have paid for my
insurance from KGM? The reason it has not been enforced is due to me putting
an appeal in. You can contact my mother on 0208 245 7454 or 07961 833021 Regards 1332, Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew [Mail To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 16:13 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, I have detailed the
process for requesting information under the subject access request and if
you wish to proceed with this please confirm. In the meantime, I am keen to
assist you if I can in confirming when cover was in force. Please can you
confirm if there is a contact number, I can call you or your Mother on and a
time that is acceptable so that I can try and help resolve this particular
issue for you. I look forward to hearing from you with this information. Regards, Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting
Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division
of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 |
M 07469 147743 | http://www.kgminsurance.co.uk http://www.canopius.com 1333,1334,1335,1336,1337,1338,1339,1340,1341, 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 427. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ MT3574694 Simon
Cordell / Page Numbers: 1342,1343,1344,1345,1346,1347,1348, 1349,1350,1351,1352,1353,1354,1355, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 26 January 2015 23:10 To: 'Wood, Peter' Cc: 'complaints@lloyds.com' Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Wood Ø
Thank you for picking this up
and taking the time to deal with this matter. Ø
The date of the appeal I do not
have yet. Ø
I are waiting for this but the
court and CPS said if I get the information needed before the court date then
it could be sent to the court who found me guilty and the CPS and this would
be linked to the case and addressed. In addition, there should be no need for
the appeal court case. Ø
I am trying to do this so that
a next day is not got to be wasted of my time in court and getting to and
from the court. Ø
The day that the police officer
pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which the police officer
lied, and the police officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is 14/11/2013.
Ø
I think due to what the police
officer said in court the CPS and judge would like to know the facts and what
the police officer said on that phone call to KGM. Ø
In addition, when KGM spoke to
the manager at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools,
I think the reason for this is the police officer committed perjury in the court.
Ø
That is why they asked me to
get proof that my insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements as to
what the police officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, in
addition, the facts how KGM found out I had in fact done nothing wrong and my
insurance should not be cancelled. Ø
However, if you think a Letter
of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be done, Ø
I would be very grateful, but
could you include in the letter only reason this has come about is due to
what the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. Ø
In addition, this is the reason
KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the insurance
policy I had in force with them. Ø
This should cover it I hope as
I really did nothing wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied to
get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound and they told
her there was no tools. Ø
The vehicle registration I was
driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included
on my insurance. Ø
So, should have shown on the
database along with my car. Ø
However, none showed up as
being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me all the
problems with the police. Ø
As already aware yes, I was
stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized. I do have some of the
some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the
vehicle out of the compound for the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up
on the 16/11/2013. Ø
I have the ones for the 08/04/2013,
29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 Ø
I just need to get the receipts
for the other dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to
no insurance from the police compound. Ø
As for the Data Subject Access
Request, I am most grateful that this is being addressed. Ø
If I had known a fee was,
needed I would have paid that right away, but due to no one getting back to
me 1343, Ø
about the ones that were put
in, I did not know a fee was needed. Regards Simon Cordell From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
Unfortunately,
Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have
picked this matter up. Ø
The first
order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case, can you confirm
when the date has been set for the hearing please? Ø
My
thought is that we provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically confirms that
you had a valid policy in force between said dates and on what vehicles, this
should satisfy the Courts but if they need anything else, we will be happy to
assist, just let me know what you require. Ø
I
understand you were stopped several times and had vehicles seized, you are in
the process of obtaining evidence of these vehicle seizures and the costs
incurred by you as a result for us to consider compensation. Ø
When
you have gathered this please forward the evidence to us as soon as possible. Ø
There
is also the matter of your Data Subject Access Request. Ø
I
have spent some time today tracking down recorded calls and various
communications and hove notified our Data Protection Officer of your request.
Ø
I
can see that you have made a request, any request should correctly be sent on
for the attention of the Data Protection Officer along with a £10 fee. Ø
Your
request was addressed generally to KGM with no fee and it would appear not
actioned. Ø
The
underwriter dealing with your request should have asked immediately for the
fee payment and escalated your request accordingly. Ø
This
was not done for which I must apologise, as a result we will waive the fee
requirement and I would confirm this is now in hand. Ø
We
have yet to issue a final response to your complaint and I would assure you
we will do this as soon as we have received your response to the above
points. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine 1344,1345,1346,1347,1348,1349,1350,1351,1352,1353,1354,1355, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 429.Wood, Peter _Re_
MT3574694 Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1357,1358,1359,1360,1361,1362,1363,1364, 1365,1366,1367,1368,1369,1370,1371 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 4 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 431. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell_ (4) / Page Numbers: 1374,1375,1376,1377,1378,1379,1380,1381, 1382,1383,1384,1385,1386,1387,1388,1389 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 5 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 432. Lorraine Cordell _RE_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1390,1391,1392,1393,1394,1395,1396,1397, 1398,1399,1400,1401,1402,1403,1404,1405 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
27/01/2015 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 429.Wood, Peter
_Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1357,1358,1359,1360,1361,1362,1363,1364, 1365,1366,1367,1368,1369,1370,1371, From: Wood, Peter [Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 27 January 2015 10:05 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon
Cordell Dear Simon, Ø I spent some time last Friday tracking down
a number of calls and did find the original call that the Police made to
Jessica and the calls Kelly made to the Compound so we can provide these and
it sounds like these are the important calls from the CPS and Courts
viewpoint. Ø I will pass these over to our Data
Protection Officer of course but will ask if its ok for me to release them to
you in the meantime before he does his official response. Ø I think we should also do the Letter of
Indemnity and will send this across to you in the next few days, there’s no
reason why you can't send this across now and it can do no harm. Ø I'm conscious we have not done a formal
final response yet to your complaint, Ø I intend to do this as soon as we receive full
details of the recovery costs you incurred and can make a decision on
compensation, Ø I trust that’s acceptable. Ø If you need anything else or have any
questions in the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us. Ø I am keeping Andy in the loop as I am due to
go on leave from 12/2/15 ‐ 8/3/15 Ø so, he will need to pick up any issues that
may arise during that time. Ø We will be in touch shortly and await
details from you as above in due course. King Regards Mr Peter Wood From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Date: 26 January 2015 23:10:04
GMT To: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Cc: complaints@lloyds.com <complaints@lloyds.com> Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Wood Ø
Thank you for picking this up
and taking the time to deal with this matter. Ø
The date of the appeal I do not
have yet. Ø
I are waiting for this but the
court and CPS said if I get the information needed before the court date then
it could be sent to the court who found me guilty and the CPS and this would
be linked to the case and addressed. In addition, there should be no need for
the appeal court case. Ø
I am trying to do this so that
a next day is not got to be wasted of my time in court and getting to and
from the court. Ø
The day that the police officer
pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which the police officer
lied, and the police officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is 14/11/2013.
Ø I
think due to what the police officer said in court the CPS and judge would
like to know the facts and 1358, Ø
what the police officer said on
that phone call to KGM. Ø
In addition, when KGM spoke to
the manager at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools,
I think the reason for this is the police officer committed perjury in the
court. Ø
That is why they asked me to
get proof that my insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements as to
what the police officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, in
addition, the facts how KGM found out I had in fact done nothing wrong and my
insurance should not be cancelled. Ø
However, if you think a Letter
of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be done, Ø
I would be very grateful, but
could you include in the letter only reason this has come about is due to
what the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. Ø
In addition, this is the reason
KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the insurance
policy I had in force with them. Ø
This should cover it I hope as
I really did nothing wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied to
get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound and they told
her there was no tools. Ø
The vehicle registration I was
driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included
on my insurance. Ø
So, should have shown on the
database along with my car. Ø
However, none showed up as
being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me all the
problems with the police. Ø
As already aware yes, I was
stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized. I do have some of the
some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the
vehicle out of the compound for the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up
on the 16/11/2013. Ø
I have the ones for the 08/04/2013,
29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 Ø
I just need to get the receipts
for the other dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to
no insurance from the police compound. Ø
As for the Data Subject Access
Request, I am most grateful that this is being addressed. Ø
If I had known a fee was,
needed I would have paid that right away, but due to no one getting back to
me about the ones that were put in, I did not know a fee was needed. Regards Simon Cordell From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
Unfortunately,
Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have
picked this matter up. Ø
The
first order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case, can you
confirm when the date has been set for the hearing please? Ø
My
thought is that we provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically confirms that
you had a valid policy in force between said dates and on what vehicles, this
should satisfy the Courts but if they need anything else, we will be happy to
assist, just let me know what you require. 1359, Ø
I
understand you were stopped several times and had vehicles seized, you are in
the process of obtaining evidence of these vehicle seizures and the costs
incurred by you as a result for us to consider compensation. Ø
When
you have gathered this please forward the evidence to us as soon as possible. Ø
There
is also the matter of your Data Subject Access Request. Ø
I
have spent some time today tracking down recorded calls and various
communications and hove notified our Data Protection Officer of your request.
Ø
I
can see that you have made a request, any request should correctly be sent on
for the attention of the Data Protection Officer along with a £10 fee. Ø
Your
request was addressed generally to KGM with no fee and it would appear not
actioned. Ø
The
underwriter dealing with your request should have asked immediately for the
fee payment and escalated your request accordingly. Ø
This
was not done for which I must apologise, as a result we will waive the fee
requirement and I would confirm this is now in hand. Ø
We
have yet to issue a final response to your complaint and I would assure you
we will do this as soon as we have received your response to the above
points. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com <Andrew.Austin@canopius.com> Subject: FW: MT3574694 Dear Andrew Please see attached
Insurance, which will show you full details of his insurance policy and dates
covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can be sorted out by
the court and I can send the information over to the CPS for the case of the
14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools in my van to
void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and Jessica know fully
what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call from the police
officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my policy
and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and she was the one
that believed the police until I went to the police compound and spoke to the
manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not done this Kelly
Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have all the emails
to prove this. 1360, After Kelly Tiller found
out I was not lying about having no tools in my van the insurance policy was
kept in place, I did ask Kelly Tiller on more than once to send me the
information and put data requests in which was not replied to. Now I have
been found guilty when Kelly Tiller knows the truth that there was not tools
and the police officer lied to KGM on the phone call. I am the one that has
suffered over all this not just on this case but all the times I have been
taken to court for no insurance over the year my policy run with KGM due to
it not showing on the MID database. You should have all the emails already
from Broadsure Direct and many was sent by them to KGM as I was told KGM
could not talk to me and I had to deal with Broadsure Direct about my policy
Martin Jenkins from Broadsure Direct should also have copies of all emails as
I do. I have spoken to DVLA today and asked for the data of how many times
points was put on my licence due to not getting summons from police and then
dealing with cases I knew nothing about and then I had to get the cases
reopened, I have to write them a letter and they will send the data I have
asked for in the post. I do have a lot of letters which I will sort out scan
and send over. But the 1st part I want to deal with is the court case I was found
guilty at and have put an appeal in that is the most important to me right
now. We can deal with everything else once I get all the data scanned as
there is really a lot and it was all due to KGM not sorting out why my
insurance was not showing on the MID database. The seizers alone have left me
out of pocket by around £1700.00. That is without all the days I have not
been able to work due to my driving licence being messed up and showing
points for no insurance. All the time going back and forward to the compound
to collect my vehicles, and everything else I have had to deal with the
courts when in fact I had done nothing wrong. I have tried to deal with this
for months and months without going to the ombudsman and KGM has taken no
notice, it has taken me to go to the ombudsman for KGM to take any notice and
I don’t feel anyone would be happy with this sort of service from KGM let
alone any company doing this and causing someone so much suffering. 1361, It was one of the police
in the end at the compound who in the end worked out why it was not showing
up on the MID and that was because there had been a space put within my Reg
Numbers. It was that bad two police compounds new me and said each time not
again. As you can see, I am not very happy about all of this, but I do not
think anyone would be when they paid for their insurance and had done nothing
wrong to suffer all this. Therefore, could you please get the information I
need to send to the CPS, I have written what was needed from Nov 2014
and way before this, and it still has not been sent and I have this hanging
over my head. I did not just get points on my licence I got disqualified from
driving for 6 months due to repeat offending of no insurance please tell me
why when I have paid for my insurance from KGM? The reason it has not been
enforced is due to me putting an appeal in. You can contact my mother on 0208
245 7454 or 07961 833021 Regards Simon Cordell _____ From: Austin, Andrew [Mail To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 16:13 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, 1362,1363,1364,1365,1366,1367,1368,1369,1370,1371, 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 431. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell_ (4) / Page Numbers: 1374,1375,1376,1377,1378,1379,1380,1381, 1382,1383,1384,1385,1386,1387,1388,1389, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 January 2015 11:12 To: 'Wood, Peter' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon
Cordell Dear Peter Ø Yes, please could you send the tapes out and
the Letter of Indemnity I would be most grateful as I think this would cover
the courts and would like to get the information to them as soon as possible
to the court and CPS. As for the other information that is acceptable, Ø as I not sure how long it will take the police
compound to send me over the information, Ø I will need to send to you they do take their
time. Ø I am just happy this matter is getting address
as said the most worrying thing was the court case and this is the
information I needed. Ø I hope you have a great time on leave. Ø I look forward to hearing from you and will
pass the information over from the police compound as soon as I have it. Regards Simon From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 27 January 2015 10:05 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Ø I
spent some time last Friday tracking down a number of calls and did find the
original call that the Police made to Jessica and the calls Kelly made to the
Compound so we can provide these and it sounds like these are the important
calls from the CPS and Courts viewpoint. Ø I
will pass these over to our Data Protection Officer of course but will ask if
its ok for me to release them to you in the meantime before he does his
official response. Ø I
think we should also do the Letter of Indemnity and will send this across to
you in the next few days, there’s no reason why you can't send this across
now and it can do no harm. Ø I'm
conscious we have not done a formal final response yet to your complaint, Ø I
intend to do this as soon as we receive full details of the recovery costs
you incurred and can make a decision on compensation, Ø I
trust that’s acceptable. Ø If
you need anything else or have any questions in the meantime, please do not
hesitate to contact us. Ø I
am keeping Andy in the loop as I am due to go on leave from 12/2/15 ‐
8/3/15 Ø so,
he will need to pick up any issues that may arise during that time. Ø We
will be in touch shortly and await details from you as above in due course. King Regards 1375, Mr Peter Wood From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Date: 26 January 2015 23:10:04
GMT To: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Cc: complaints@lloyds.com <complaints@lloyds.com> Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Wood Ø
Thank you for picking this up
and taking the time to deal with this matter. Ø
The date of the appeal I do not
have yet. Ø
I are waiting for this but the
court and CPS said if I get the information needed before the court date then
it could be sent to the court who found me guilty and the CPS and this would
be linked to the case and addressed. In addition, there should be no need for
the appeal court case. Ø
I am trying to do this so that
a next day is not got to be wasted of my time in court and getting to and
from the court. Ø
The day that the police officer
pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which the police officer
lied, and the police officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is 14/11/2013.
Ø I
think due to what the police officer said in court the CPS and judge would
like to know the facts and Ø
what the police officer said on
that phone call to KGM. Ø
In addition, when KGM spoke to
the manager at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools,
I think the reason for this is the police officer committed perjury in the
court. Ø
That is why they asked me to
get proof that my insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements as to
what the police officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, in
addition, the facts how KGM found out I had in fact done nothing wrong and my
insurance should not be cancelled. Ø
However, if you think a Letter
of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be done, Ø
I would be very grateful, but
could you include in the letter only reason this has come about is due to
what the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. Ø
In addition, this is the reason
KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the insurance
policy I had in force with them. Ø
This should cover it I hope as
I really did nothing wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied to
get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound and they told
her there was no tools. Ø
The vehicle registration I was
driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included
on my insurance. Ø
So, should have shown on the
database along with my car. Ø
However, none showed up as
being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me all the
problems with the police. Ø
As already aware yes, I was
stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized. I do have some of the
some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the
vehicle out of the compound for the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up
on the 16/11/2013. Ø
I have the ones for the 08/04/2013,
29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 Ø
I just need to get the receipts
for the other dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to
no insurance from the police compound. Ø
As for the Data Subject Access
Request, I am most grateful that this is being addressed. Ø
If I had known a fee was,
needed I would have paid that right away, but due to no one getting back to
me about the ones that were put in, I did not know a fee was needed. Regards Simon Cordell 1376,1377,1378,1379,1380,1381,1382,1383,1384, 1385,1386,1387,1388,1389, 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 432. Lorraine Cordell _RE_ MT3574694 Simon
Cordell_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1390,1391,1392,1393,1394,1395,1396, 1397,1398,1399,1400,1401,1402,1403,1404,1405, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 January 2015 11:14 To: 'Wood, Peter' Cc: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø
Yes, please could you send the
tapes out and the Letter of Indemnity I would be most grateful as I think
this would cover the courts and would like to get the information to them as
soon as possible to the court and CPS. As for the other information that is
acceptable, Ø
as I not sure how long it will
take the police compound to send me over the information, Ø
I will need to send to you they
do take their time. Ø
I am just happy this matter is
getting address as said the most worrying thing was the court case and this
is the information I needed. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
leave. Ø
I look forward to hearing from
you and will pass the information over from the police compound as soon as I
have it. Regards Simon From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 27 January 2015 10:05 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Simon, Ø I
spent some time last Friday tracking down a number of calls and did find the
original call that the Police made to Jessica and the calls Kelly made to the
Compound so we can provide these and it sounds like these are the important
calls from the CPS and Courts viewpoint. Ø I
will pass these over to our Data Protection Officer of course but will ask if
its ok for me to release them to you in the meantime before he does his
official response. Ø I
think we should also do the Letter of Indemnity and will send this across to
you in the next few days, there’s no reason why you can't send this across
now and it can do no harm. Ø I'm
conscious we have not done a formal final response yet to your complaint, Ø I
intend to do this as soon as we receive full details of the recovery costs
you incurred and can make a decision on compensation, Ø I
trust that’s acceptable. Ø If
you need anything else or have any questions in the meantime, please do not
hesitate to contact us. Ø I
am keeping Andy in the loop as I am due to go on leave from 12/2/15 ‐
8/3/15 Ø so,
he will need to pick up any issues that may arise during that time. 1391, Ø We
will be in touch shortly and await details from you as above in due course. King Regards Mr Peter Wood From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Date: 26 January 2015 23:10:04
GMT To: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Cc: complaints@lloyds.com <complaints@lloyds.com> Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Wood Ø
Thank you for picking this up
and taking the time to deal with this matter. Ø
The date of the appeal I do not
have yet. Ø
I are waiting for this but the
court and CPS said if I get the information needed before the court date then
it could be sent to the court who found me guilty and the CPS and this would
be linked to the case and addressed. In addition, there should be no need for
the appeal court case. Ø
I am trying to do this so that
a next day is not got to be wasted of my time in court and getting to and
from the court. Ø
The day that the police officer
pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which the police officer
lied, and the police officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is 14/11/2013.
Ø I
think due to what the police officer said in court the CPS and judge would
like to know the facts and Ø
what the police officer said on
that phone call to KGM. Ø
In addition, when KGM spoke to
the manager at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools,
I think the reason for this is the police officer committed perjury in the
court. Ø
That is why they asked me to
get proof that my insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements as to
what the police officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, in
addition, the facts how KGM found out I had in fact done nothing wrong and my
insurance should not be cancelled. Ø
However, if you think a Letter
of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be done, Ø
I would be very grateful, but
could you include in the letter only reason this has come about is due to
what the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. Ø
In addition, this is the reason
KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the insurance
policy I had in force with them. Ø
This should cover it I hope as
I really did nothing wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied to
get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound and they told
her there was no tools. Ø
The vehicle registration I was
driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included
on my insurance. Ø
So, should have shown on the
database along with my car. Ø
However, none showed up as
being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me all the
problems with the police. Ø
As already aware yes, I was
stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized. I do have some of the
some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the
vehicle out of the compound for the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up
on the 16/11/2013. Ø
I have the ones for the 08/04/2013,
29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 Ø
I just need to get the receipts
for the other dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to
no insurance from the police compound. Ø
As for the Data Subject Access
Request, I am most grateful that this is being addressed. Ø
If I had known a fee was,
needed I would have paid that right away, but due to no one getting back to
me about the ones that were put in, I did not know a fee was needed. Regards Simon Cordell 1392,1393,1394,1395,1396,1397,1398,1399, 1400,1401,1402,1403,1404,1405, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
27/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
28/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
29/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
30/01/2015 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
48. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 48 Peter.Wood@canopius.com_01.30.2015_RE MT3574694
Simon Cordell 30/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 361,362,363,364,365,366 367,368,369,370,371,372 373,374,375,376,377,378 379,380,381,382,383,384 385 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 434. Wood, Peter _Re_
MT3574694 Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1411,1412,1413,1414,1415,1416,1417, 1418,1419,1420,1421,1422,1423,1424,1425,1426,1427 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
30/01/2015 |
17:02:00 |
X25 361,362,363,364 365,366,367,368 369,370,371,372 373,374,375,376 377,378,379,380 381,382,383,384 385, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
48. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 48 Peter.Wood@canopius.com_01.30.2015_RE MT3574694
Simon Cordell 30/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 361,362,363,364,365,366 367,368,369,370,371,372 373,374,375,376,377,378 379,380,381,382,383,384 385 -- 361, From: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Sent: 30 January 2015
17:02 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew;
Donovan, Paul Subject: Simon Cordell Attachments: RE: MT3574694 S Cordell 300115.pdf; s Cordell call from police
141113.wma; Van-reciept-10-11-2013.jpg; MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ
(28.9 KB); 26_H_2013_13_53_KellyTiller
Kelly call to compound.wav Dear Simon, Please find attached the
following - Ø Recording of the original
call made by the Police officer to KGM in which he advised that there were
tools in your van. Ø Recording of the call
between Kelly Tiller and the Police compound in which Kelly was advised that
there were no tools in the vehicle. Ø Receipt showing purchase of
the van. Ø E-Mail from Gareth Mullet
from the compound confirming that there was nothing on the seizure notice to
indicate that there were any tools removed from the vehicle or in the vehicle
in the compound. Ø Letter of Indemnity for the
CPS/Courts. Ø
I
believe these are the relevant items you were after and hope this will assist
you to resolve the court matters. Ø
If you
need anything else please let me know, or in my absence Andy Austin. Ø
Paul
Donovan will respond separately in respect of your data request but hopefully
the attached will meet your requirements. Ø
As soon
as I receive documentation from you to support costs incurred, Ø
I can
consider our response on compensation. Ø
No
doubt I will hear from you shortly, in the meantime have a good weekend. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 January 2015 11:14 To: Wood, Peter Cc: Austin, Andrew; complaints@lloyds.com Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø
Yes, please could you send the
tapes out and the Letter of Indemnity I would be most grateful as I think
this would cover the courts and would like to get the information to them as
soon as possible to the court and CPS. As for the other information that is
acceptable, Ø
as I not sure how long it will
take the police compound to send me over the information, Ø
I will need to send to you they
do take their time. 362, Ø
I am just happy this matter is
getting address as said the most worrying thing was the court case and this
is the information I needed. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
leave. Ø
I look forward to hearing from
you and will pass the information over from the police compound as soon as I
have it. Regards Simon From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 27 January 2015 10:05 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Simon, Ø I
spent some time last Friday tracking down a number of calls and did find the
original call that the Police made to Jessica and the calls Kelly made to the
Compound so we can provide these and it sounds like these are the important
calls from the CPS and Courts viewpoint. Ø I
will pass these over to our Data Protection Officer of course but will ask if
its ok for me to release them to you in the meantime before he does his
official response. Ø I
think we should also do the Letter of Indemnity and will send this across to
you in the next few days, there’s no reason why you can't send this across
now and it can do no harm. Ø I'm
conscious we have not done a formal final response yet to your complaint, Ø I
intend to do this as soon as we receive full details of the recovery costs
you incurred and can make a decision on compensation, Ø I
trust that’s acceptable. Ø If
you need anything else or have any questions in the meantime, please do not
hesitate to contact us. Ø I
am keeping Andy in the loop as I am due to go on leave from 12/2/15 ‐
8/3/15 Ø so,
he will need to pick up any issues that may arise during that time. Ø We
will be in touch shortly and await details from you as above in due course. King Regards Mr Peter Wood From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Date: 26 January 2015 23:10:04
GMT To: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Cc: complaints@lloyds.com <complaints@lloyds.com> Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Wood Ø
Thank you for picking this up
and taking the time to deal with this matter. 363, Ø
The date of the appeal I do not
have yet. Ø
I are waiting for this but the
court and CPS said if I get the information needed before the court date then
it could be sent to the court who found me guilty and the CPS and this would
be linked to the case and addressed. In addition, there should be no need for
the appeal court case. Ø
I am trying to do this so that
a next day is not got to be wasted of my time in court and getting to and
from the court. Ø
The day that the police officer
pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which the police officer
lied, and the police officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is 14/11/2013.
Ø I
think due to what the police officer said in court the CPS and judge would
like to know the facts and Ø
what the police officer said on
that phone call to KGM. Ø
In addition, when KGM spoke to
the manager at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools,
I think the reason for this is the police officer committed perjury in the
court. Ø
That is why they asked me to
get proof that my insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements as to
what the police officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, in
addition, the facts how KGM found out I had in fact done nothing wrong and my
insurance should not be cancelled. Ø
However, if you think a Letter
of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be done, Ø
I would be very grateful, but
could you include in the letter only reason this has come about is due to
what the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. Ø
In addition, this is the reason
KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the insurance
policy I had in force with them. Ø
This should cover it I hope as
I really did nothing wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied to
get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound and they told
her there was no tools. Ø
The vehicle registration I was
driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included
on my insurance. Ø
So, should have shown on the
database along with my car. Ø
However, none showed up as
being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me all the
problems with the police. Ø
As already aware yes, I was
stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized. I do have some of the
some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the
vehicle out of the compound for the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up
on the 16/11/2013. Ø
I have the ones for the 08/04/2013,
29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 Ø
I just need to get the receipts
for the other dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to
no insurance from the police compound. Ø
As for the Data Subject Access
Request, I am most grateful that this is being addressed. Ø
If I had known a fee was,
needed I would have paid that right away, but due to no one getting back to
me about the ones that were put in, I did not know a fee was needed. Regards Simon Cordell From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694 364, Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
Unfortunately,
Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have
picked this matter up. Ø
The
first order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case, can you
confirm when the date has been set for the hearing please? Ø
My
thought is that we provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically confirms that
you had a valid policy in force between said dates and on what vehicles, this
should satisfy the Courts but if they need anything else, we will be happy to
assist, just let me know what you require. Ø
I
understand you were stopped several times and had vehicles seized, you are in
the process of obtaining evidence of these vehicle seizures and the costs
incurred by you as a result for us to consider compensation. Ø
When
you have gathered this please forward the evidence to us as soon as possible. Ø
There
is also the matter of your Data Subject Access Request. Ø
I
have spent some time today tracking down recorded calls and various
communications and hove notified our Data Protection Officer of your request.
Ø
I
can see that you have made a request, any request should correctly be sent on
for the attention of the Data Protection Officer along with a £10 fee. Ø
Your
request was addressed generally to KGM with no fee and it would appear not
actioned. Ø
The
underwriter dealing with your request should have asked immediately for the
fee payment and escalated your request accordingly. Ø
This
was not done for which I must apologise, as a result we will waive the fee
requirement and I would confirm this is now in hand. Ø
We
have yet to issue a final response to your complaint and I would assure you
we will do this as soon as we have received your response to the above
points. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder. co.uk> To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com <Andrew.Austin@canopius.com> Subject: FW: MT3574694 Dear Andrew Please see attached Insurance, which will show
you full details of his insurance policy and dates covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can
be sorted out by the court 365, and I can send the information over to the CPS
for the case of the 14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools
in my van to void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and
Jessica know fully what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call
from the police officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing
with my policy and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and
she was the one that believed the police until I went to the police compound
and spoke to the manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not
done this Kelly Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have
all the emails to prove this. After Kelly Tiller found out I was not lying
about having no tools in my van the insurance policy was kept in place, I did
ask Kelly Tiller on more than once to send me the information and put data
requests in which was not replied to. Now I have been found guilty when Kelly
Tiller knows the truth that there was not tools and the police officer lied
to KGM on the phone call. I am the one that has suffered over all this not
just on this case but all the times I have been taken to court for no
insurance over the year my policy run with KGM due to it not showing on the
MID database. You should have all the emails already from
Broadsure Direct and many was sent by them to KGM as I was told KGM could not
talk to me and I had to deal with Broadsure Direct about my policy Martin
Jenkins from Broadsure Direct should also have copies of all emails as I do. I have spoken to DVLA today and asked for the
data of how many times points was put on my licence due to not getting
summons from police and then dealing with cases I knew nothing about and then
I had to get the cases reopened, I have to write them a letter and they will
send the data I have asked for in the post. I do have a lot of letters which I will sort out
scan and send over. But the 1st part I want to deal with is the court case I
was found guilty at and have put an appeal in that is the most important to
me right now. We can deal with everything else once I get all
the data scanned as there is 366, really a lot and it was all due to KGM not sorting out why my insurance
was not showing on the MID database. The seizers alone have left me out of
pocket by around £1700.00. That is without all the days I have not been able
to work due to my driving licence being messed up and showing points for no
insurance. All the time going back and forward to the compound to collect my
vehicles, and everything else I have had to deal with the courts when in fact
I had done nothing wrong. I have tried to deal with this for months and months without going to
the ombudsman and KGM has taken no notice, it has taken me to go to the
ombudsman for KGM to take any notice and I don’t feel anyone would be happy
with this sort of service from KGM let alone any company doing this and
causing someone so much suffering. It was one of the police in the end at the compound who in the end
worked out why it was not showing up on the MID and that was because there
had been a space put within my Reg Numbers. It was that bad two police
compounds new me and said each time not again. As you can see, I am not very happy about all of this, but I do not
think anyone would be when they paid for their insurance and had done nothing
wrong to suffer all this. Therefore, could you please get the information I need to send to the
CPS; I have written what was needed from Nov 2014 and way before this, and it
still has not been sent and I have this hanging over my head. I did not just
get points on my licence I got disqualified from driving for 6 months due to
repeat offending of no insurance please tell me why when I have paid for my
insurance from KGM? The reason it has not been enforced is due to me putting
an appeal in. You can contact my mother on Regards 367, Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Sent: 21 January 2015 16:13 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, I have detailed the process for requesting
information under the subject access request and if you wish to proceed with
this please confirm. In the meantime, I am keen to assist you if I can
in confirming when cover was in force. Please can you confirm if there is a contact
number, I can call you or your Mother on and a time that is acceptable so
that I can try and help resolve this particular issue for you. I look forward to hearing from you with this
information. Regards, Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM
Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ 368, D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 | M 07469 147743 | <http://www.kgminsurance.co.uk/> www.kgminsurance.co.uk | <http://www.canopius.com/> www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Andrew I will forward this to you within a few days I
will ask the police compound to do a full print out as to all the tickets as
I believe there is a few missing. I do have around 6 of the tickets here when the
vehicles were sized, I also do have court letters, and letters from DVLA,
which I will forward over to you once I have scanned then in so please give
me a few days and I will get back to you with this information as there is a
lot of data. The main one at this time I am worried about is
the case where the vehicle was sized due to the police lying and me being
found guilty at court you did have an email on the 30 November 2014 about
what was needed and I do have the court letter showing I was found guilty and
about the appeal. This data should have been given under the
Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 I put in, so was
wondering what you can do about this and if you will need a new Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in
so to do a 4th I do not feel I should need to do. KGM have in fact did not follow the protocol for
the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 which has been
put in 3 times already to KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information
Commissioner’s Office as I do not see any reason you would have to stop the
information, I have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact
guilty of no insurance. 369, And now say to deal with this you need
information from me. I can understand you want the information for the
complaint that has been put in, but not the information I asked for to show I
was in fact I was insured for an appeal that is ongoing. And in fact, would
not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under the Data Protection
Act 1998 as I would not have been found guilty. I would like the data sent to the court as soon
as possible in regard to this so they can look at the facts and see if fact I
was insured so there should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more
of my time wasted going to court. Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell Thank you for your email. My letter dated 22/12/14 requests the following
documentary evidence from you With regards to any losses that may have been
incurred as a result of the above, I confirm as detailed in my previous
letter, I require the following: - 370, 1. Confirmation of the points you raised to the
Financial Ombudsman when you verbally submitted your complaint and
the outcome you are looking to achieve. 2. Full details of the losses that you have incurred
as a direct result of your complaint and full documentary evidence supporting
this. 3. Confirmation of dates of any convictions or costs
imposed directly as a result of your complaint, including full documentary
evidence supporting this. Once I receive all of the above, I will be happy
to consider this further. With regards to your subject access request. My
letter of the 9/12/14 advised the following: - Following our initial investigations, we note
that you submitted a subject access request to your Broker. Should you wish
to proceed with this, please can you formally request this in writing to our
Data Protection Officer at the address detailed at the foot of the letter
including a cheque payable to KGM Insurance for the sum of £10.00.
Alternatively, you may wish to wait until our full investigations have been
finalised. Can you please confirm how you wish to proceed
with that request? Should you not be in receipt of any of the
letters I refer to advise me above, please and I will ensure copies are sent
to you immediately. I await your reply Andrew Austin 371, Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM
Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ From: Lorraine Cordell mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing due to the complaint I put in. I
have forwarded emails to Broadsure Direct and spoken to Broadsure Direct who
took the policy of insurance out policy no: MT3574694 I have been asking for information from KGM since
2013 and have heard nothing back. When the policy was taken out there was some
reason it did not show up on the MID database Broadsure Direct and KGM was
aware of this. Due to this fact I had my vehicles were sized a
number of times I believe 8 or 9 times in all, where I had to pay the costs
to get my vehicles out the compound each time. In the week when I was pulled
by police it was not so bad as the insurance company was opened so when I
showed the police my policy, they could call the insurance company. The seizers happened mostly at the weekend mostly
due to the insurance company being closed and the police could not talk to
anyone even when I had my policy on me at all times to prove I did in fact
have insurance. 372, I made many calls to the police, Broadsure
Direct, KGM and the people who run the MID database, but the issue did not go
away, and my vehicles still did not show up on the MID database. There was also a time in Nov 2013 when my van was
sized this was due to KGM telling the police I was not insured due to the
police telling KGM that I had tools in my van. Which was a lie by the police
as I did not have anything in my van. Kelly Tiller from the trade section was
dealing with this and a few days later I got a letter from KGM saying they
was going to cancel my policy. As you can understand I was very upset over
this as I had done nothing wrong. At this time lots of calls was both made to KMG
and Broadsure to stop the cancelation of my insurance policy, I spoke to
Kelly Tiller many times, but she believed the police and I had no say in the
matter. The police were off duty so I could not speak to them and Kelly
Tiller was saying unless I could prove I did not have any tools in my van
then the insurance policy would be cancelled which was very unfair as I had
done nothing wrong, I knew I never had any tools. But I also asked Kelly Tiller did the police tell
her what tools was meant to be in my van, to which she said no. KGM was not
even aware I had mechanics trade on my policy so if my mechanics tools had
been in my van at the time my insurance would still have been cancelled which
to me what was the point in having insurance? I then spoke to a wonderful operator at the
police when I called told her what had gone on and was told by her to go to
the police compound as when any vehicles are taken there, they have to do a
full list of items that are in the vehicles as they are in fact legible if
something goes missing. Over that weekend I sent emails to the compound and
forwarded them to Broadsure as my insurance was due to be cancelled on the
Monday. On Monday I got an email from Broadsure direct asking me to go to the
compound as Kelly Tiller had no luck getting a reply from them also, and once
there to call Kelly Tiller due to the time on the Monday I got the email it
would have been too late to go the compound and get a call to Kelly Tiller as
she would have ended work for that day so I sent an email saying I would be
going there early the next morning. I went the next day and asked to speak to the
manager of the compound who in 373, fact looked up my van and said nothing was in
there, there was not tools I called Kelly Tiller and the manager of the
compound spoke to her and confirmed there was nothing in the van when it was
taken there by police and that I had put thing in the van when I had taken it
out of the compound. At this point Kelly tiller believed me and said
the policy would not be cancelled. But on my way back from the compound
driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and it was Broadsure direct
saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was very upset at this and told
them what had happened, I was asked to hold on they was called KGM back and
would call me right back. I waited till Broadsure direct called me back and
confirmed my insurance policy had not been cancelled then drove home. From this point I have been asking for all
information and putting data protection acts in which have not been dealt
with and I have heard nothing from KGM. I have been back and forward to court due to no
insurance and in fact 4 cases I did not get any summons so was in fact found
guilty as I did not know it was even going to court. I have had points put on my driving licence for
no reason and had to go back and forward to court many times when this should
not have been the case. Then the case come up for the seizer when the
police said I had tools in my van I went to court with all my documents but
due to not having the information I had asked for from KGM many times about
that case I was found guilty. I am very upset about the whole policy with
KGM. I have put an appeal in, and this case will be going to crown court I
have again asked for information and again heard nothing. These matters need
to be addressed as I am suffering due to all of this. Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows
everything that has gone on as he was my main contact. 374, I also have all the emails the last one that I
will enclose again, which I have heard nothing about and the 1st Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the
26/11/2013. I did in fact send the Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998 about time times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into
why I had heard nothing about more than once. Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I
will ask the court to summons the people at KGM to deal with this matter as
they know I was insurance and did nothing wrong and the police lied. All I
have asked for is the data so there will be no need to summons people this
way I can send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown and the
other information and this case should be dropped against me. It just seemed that KGM does not want to do
anything and give me the information I need to prove in fact I was insurance
and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it that I was not insurance. There is a lot more I could say about the
insurance I had with KGM, but this insurance policy was my worst nightmare.
It has messed my clean driving licence up and in fact got to the point I
could not drive so could not work. Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the
information over that was needed to prove I did have insurance. If you need o can send over all the emails that
has been sent back and forward to Broadsure who sent them to KGM. I have lost a lot of money, and time due to this
insurance policy I have had to pay for my vehicles to be taken out of the
police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost of £180.00 to £200.00 a time.
All the loss of work due to having to take time to go to the police compound,
and all the times I have had to go to court for no insurance when in fact I
had insurance. And points put on my driving licence to the fact I could not
drive, this has all been costs to myself. My Mother Lorraine Cordell has also written many
of the emails and is fine with dealing with this issue. 375, Regards Simon Cordell 376, Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments
is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this
message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content
of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use,
or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member
of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents
Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number
02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England
and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents
Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number
02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy 377, this message and notify the sender immediately.
Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and received via its network
for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent
for and on behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One
Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales 378,
End of Picture! 379,
End of Picture! 380,
End of Picture! 381, Blank page! 380, RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell-> MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ (28.9
KB).msg From: MT Underwriting [MT.Underwriting@canopius.com] To: Gramlick, Les Sent: 04 December 2014 15:34:12 Subject: FW: MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Kelly Tiller Ø
Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9116 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com 26/11/2013 From: GARETH.Mullett@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:GARETH.Mullett@met.pnn.police.uk] On Behalf Of VresCharlton@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 November 2013 14:10 To: Tiller, Kelly Subject: RE: MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Kelly, Ø I have looked at the
seizure notice nothing was taken at the roadside Ø and nothing was
registered as left in the vehicle Regards Gareth 25/11/2013 From: Tiller, Kelly [mailto: Kelly.Tiller@canopius.com Sent: 25 November 2013
16:28 To: VRES Mailbox -
Charlton Subject: RE: MR SIMON CORDELL -
CX52 JRZ Ø
I have been told by
the police that you do a report on all items that was in the vehicle at the
time it was ceased. Ø
Can I have a copy of
this report please? Kind regards Kelly Tiller Fleet Underwriting | KGM
Motor Insurance - Member of the Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close
| London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1818 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com 25/11/2013 From: Sarah.Williams6@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Sarah.Williams6@met.pnn.police.uk On Behalf Of VresCharlton@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 25 November 2013
16:26 To: Tiller, Kelly Subject: RE: MR SIMON CORDELL -
CX52 JRZ Ø
We have no record
what was in the vehicle, Ø
we do not touch the
vehicles contents. Regards F S Williams 382, RE: MT3574694 Simon
Cordell-> MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ (28.9 KB).msg From: Tiller, Kelly mailto: Kelly.Tiller@canopius.com Sent: 25 November 2013 10:55 To: VRES Mailbox - Charlton Subject: MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Morning, Ø I need some assistance
with regards to the above. Ø We ensure Mr Simon
Cordell and I need a copy of the report of the items that was in his vehicle
at the time it was ceased. Ø We are due to cancel
his policy @ noon today. Ø Your urgent advises are
awaited. Kind regards Kelly Tiller Fleet Underwriting | KGM Motor Insurance - Member of the Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1818 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius
Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed representative
of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Syndicate
260 which is managed by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office:
Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and
Wales Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We
are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary. NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject
to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of
the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please
notify the sender and delete it from your 383, RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell-> MR SIMON
CORDELL - CX52 JRZ (28.9 KB).msg system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute
or copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender.
MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Syndicate
260 which is managed by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery
9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We
are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary. NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be
confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). 384, RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell-> MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ (28.9 KB).msg 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 434. Wood, Peter _Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1411,1412,1413,1414,1415,1416,1417,1418,1419, 1420,1421,1422,1423,1424,1425,1426,1427, From: Wood, Peter [Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 30 January 2015 17:02 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew; Donovan, Paul Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Attachments: RE: MT3574694 S
Cordell 300115.pdf; s Cordell call from police 141113.wma; Van-reciept-10-11-2013.jpg; MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ (28.9 KB); 26_H_2013_13_53_KellyTiller Kelly call to compound.wav Dear Simon, Please find attached the following - Ø
Recording
of the original call made by the Police officer to KGM in which he advised
that there were tools in your van. Ø
Recording
of the call between Kelly Tiller and the Police compound in which Kelly was
advised that there were no tools in the vehicle. Ø
Receipt
showing purchase of the van. Ø
E-Mail
from Gareth Mullet from the compound confirming that there was nothing on the
seizure notice to indicate that there were any tools removed from the vehicle
or in the vehicle in the compound. Ø
Letter
of Indemnity for the CPS/Courts. Ø I believe
these are the relevant items you were after and hope this will assist you to
resolve the court matters. Ø If you
need anything else please let me know, or in my absence Andy Austin. Ø Paul
Donovan will respond separately in respect of your data request but hopefully
the attached will meet your requirements. Ø As soon as I
receive documentation from you to support costs incurred, Ø I can
consider our response on compensation. Ø No doubt
I will hear from you shortly, in the meantime have a good weekend. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 January 2015 11:14 To: Wood, Peter Cc: Austin, Andrew; complaints@lloyds.com Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø
Yes, please could you send the
tapes out and the Letter of Indemnity I would be most grateful as I think
this would cover the courts and would like to get the information to them as
soon as possible to the court and CPS. As for the other information that is
acceptable, Ø
as I not sure how long it will
take the police compound to send me over the information, Ø
I will need to send to you they
do take their time. Ø
I am just happy this matter is
getting address as said the most worrying thing was the court case and this
is the information I needed. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
leave. Ø
I look forward to hearing from
you and will pass the information over from the police compound as soon as I
have it. 1412,1413,1414,1415,1416,1417,1418,1419,1420,1421, 1422,1423,1424,1425,1426,1427, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
49. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 49 enquiries@cps.gsi.gov.uk_01.31.2015_RE Case appeal 31/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 386 2 1x Email My Insurance! Subject Forward: MT3xxx94; Insurance Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds
Bank / Canopius! 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 435.. Lorraine Cordell
_Fwd._ MT3574694 Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1428,1429,1430,1431,1432,1433,1434, 1435,1436,1437,1438,1439,1440,1441,1442,1443,1444 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 412. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1230,1231,1232,1233,1234,1235,1236, 1237,1238,1239,1240,1241,1242,1243,1244,1245,1246,1247 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 5 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 413. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Case appeal / Page Numbers: 1248 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Wimbledon magistrates! 6 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 433. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Public complaint by your son Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1408,1409 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
31/01/2015 |
02:59:00 |
X1 386 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
50. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 50 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_01.31.2015_FW MT3574694
Simon Cordell 31/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 387,388,389,390 391,392,393,394,395,396 397,398,399,400,401,402 403,404,405,406,407,408 409,410,411,412,413 |
31/01/2015 |
18:15:00 |
X26 387,388 389,390,391,392 393,394,395,396 397,398,399,400 401,402,403,404 405,406,407,408 409,410,411,412 413, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
51. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 51 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_01.31.2015_RE Case appeal 31/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 414 |
31/01/2015 |
02:58:00 |
X1 414 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
52. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 52
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_01.31.2015_RE MT3574694
Simon Cordell 31/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 415,416,417,418,419,420 421,422,423,424,425,426 427,428,429,430,431,432 433 |
31/01/2015 |
01:47:00 |
X19 415,416 417,418,419,420 421,422,423,424 425,426,427,428 429,430,431,432 433, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
49. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 49 enquiries@cps.gsi.gov.uk_01.31.2015_RE Case appeal 31/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 386 -- 386, From: Enquiries Sent: 31 January 2015
02:59 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Case appeal Ø Thank you for
contacting Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) Enquiries Ø The CPS is
responsible for prosecuting most criminal cases in England and Wales,
following a police investigation. Ø If you are
contacting CPS Enquiries in relation to a case which is presently before the
courts, or in relation to a case which the CPS is advising the police on
charges, you should contact the relevant CPS area directly. Ø Contact details for
the 13 CPS regional offices can be found at the following link: Ø Your query may be
forwarded to the relevant CPS regional office in the best position to respond
to any issues that you have raised. Ø If your email is
forwarded, a response will be provided to you by the relevant CPS regional
office within 20 working days. Ø Please note that if
you have previously been advised that the CPS cannot aid you and your query
does not raise any new issues, we will not be able to provide any further
response. Ø If your enquiry
does not relate to the CPS, we will be unable to provide a response, but may
be able to provide contact details for the relevant agency or organisation. Ø This e-mail is
private and is intended only for the addressee and any copy recipients. Ø If you are not an
intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. Ø Activity and use of
CPS Connect systems, the Government Secure Intranet, and the Criminal Justice
Extranet is monitored to secure their effective operation and for other
lawful business purposes. Communications using these systems will also be
monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other
lawful business purposes. END 2 1x Email My Insurance! Date: Saturday 31 January 2015, 19:08 Subject: Forward: MT3xxx94; Insurance Simon Cordell From: Rewired re_wired@ymail.com Ø
Can
you listen to this for me and tell me your opinion's thanks Simon? Kelly Tiller Member of the UK
Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London |
E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9116 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 435.. Lorraine
Cordell _Fwd._ MT3574694 Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1428,1429,1430,1431,1432,1433,1434, 1435,1436,1437,1438,1439,1440,1441,1442,1443,1444, -- From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 January 2015 18:15 To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com' Cc: 'm.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com Subject: FW: MT3574694 Simon
Cordell Attachments: S Cordell 300115.pdf; s Cordell call from police 141113.wma; Vanreciept10112013.jpg; MR SIMON CORDELL CX52 JRZ (28.9 KB) 26_11_2013_13_53__KellyTiller Kelly call to compound.wav Hi Josey Ø I got the attached information from Simon’s
insurance company on Friday. Ø After a lot of work to get it and a lot of
emails and over a year of time. Ø The letter of Indemnity is not correct with
some points which I have asked peter wood to address. Ø Simon has asked me to forward this to you. Ø The reason is this show how far the police
will go to lie. Ø Not only did he lie to KGM Simon’s insurance,
about tools being in Simon’s van to void Simon insurance cover and be able to
seize his van. Ø He then went on to lie in his statement of
facts to be used at court saying nothing about tools just that the insurance
said Simon’s was not covered by his insurance. Ø He then stood up in court and under oath when
the judge asked him about tools being in the van said he did not say tools
was in the van. Ø The reason the judge asked this was he saw
emails from KGM saying about the tools. Ø Simon was found guilty of this and we have
taken it to appeal and are waiting on a date. Ø But in the Asbo case can this not be shown
that the police will lie even under oath. Ø They are trying to use Simon’s char in the
Asbo case and make him look bad. Ø Why can we not show the police in the same
light by using this information? Ø Simon has asked can you get the case papers
from the courts for this case and the Woolwich case. Ø As these cases do show somewhat how far the
police are willing to go with Simon. Ø In the Asbo case papers you have police saying
in their statement they know Simon is always insured it is on police file how
much he was stopped. Ø Yet he has around 8 cases at court for no
insurance. Ø In addition, most of these cases he never had
a summons for and they found him guilty due to him knowing nothing about the
case was due to be in court. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 30 January 2015 17:02 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew; Donovan, Paul Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Attachments: RE: MT3574694 S
Cordell 300115.pdf; s Cordell call from police 141113.wma; Van-reciept-10-11-2013.jpg; MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ (28.9 KB); 26_H_2013_13_53_KellyTiller Kelly call to compound.wav Dear Simon, Please find attached the following - Ø
Recording
of the original call made by the Police officer to KGM in which he advised
that there were tools in your van. Recording of the call between Kelly Tiller and
the Police compound in which Kelly was advised that 1429, Ø
there
were no tools in the vehicle. Ø
Receipt
showing purchase of the van. Ø
E-Mail
from Gareth Mullet from the compound confirming that there was nothing on the
seizure notice to indicate that there were any tools removed from the vehicle
or in the vehicle in the compound. Ø
Letter
of Indemnity for the CPS/Courts. Ø I believe
these are the relevant items you were after and hope this will assist you to
resolve the court matters. Ø If you
need anything else please let me know, or in my absence Andy Austin. Ø Paul
Donovan will respond separately in respect of your data request but hopefully
the attached will meet your requirements. Ø As soon as I
receive documentation from you to support costs incurred, Ø I can
consider our response on compensation. Ø No doubt
I will hear from you shortly, in the meantime have a good weekend. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 January 2015 11:14 To: Wood, Peter Cc: Austin, Andrew; complaints@lloyds.com Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø
Yes, please could you send the
tapes out and the Letter of Indemnity I would be most grateful as I think
this would cover the courts and would like to get the information to them as
soon as possible to the court and CPS. As for the other information that is
acceptable, Ø
as I not sure how long it will
take the police compound to send me over the information, Ø
I will need to send to you they
do take their time. Ø
I am just happy this matter is
getting address as said the most worrying thing was the court case and this
is the information I needed. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
leave. Ø
I look forward to hearing from
you and will pass the information over from the police compound as soon as I
have it. Regards Simon From:
Wood,
Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] 1430,1431,1432,1433,1434,1435,1436,1437,1438, 1439,1440,1441,1442,1443,1444, 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 412. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1230,1231,1232,1233,1234,1235,1236, 1237,1238,1239,1240,1241,1242,1243,1244,1245,1246,1247, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 January 2015 01:47 To: 'Wood, Peter' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon
Cordell Attachments: registration MA47LDY
Corrected.pdf Dear Peter Ø Thank you very much for the information you
have sent, I do see some errors in your letter of Indemnity.
Ø This registration was always put in not
correctly but was in fact given to Broadsure Direct correctly. Ø The registration should have been Ford Zetec
registration MA57LDY Ø This was later correct after the 3rd time of
telling the Ford Zetec registration as MA57LDY Ø please see attached document. Ø This is the registration that should have been
on the policy from the start. Ø We never knew it was not correct until 08/04/13
when again the correct registration was given. Ø However, it was put down as Renault Clio
registration NA57LDY, Ø we then believe it was put in correctly and
not a new car added. Ø We were not sent any documents of that change
so did not know there was again an error until the Oct 2013 when it
was in fact corrected this time, we asked for new documents to be sent which
they were so we could check. Ø But they kept on his policy Renault Clio
registration NA57LDY we made a next call and told them this needed to be
removed and was told it would be done. Ø It seems this was never done by what you have
sent in your email. Ø I do believe I have emails also about this
issue to Broadsure Direct and Martin Jenkins, can confirm this as he was the
one, we dealt with at Broadsure Direct. Ø He also should remember all the phone calls. Ø There is also a next issue Simon was not just
covered with the basic trade insurance with KGM, Broadsure Direct had a
special section with KGM which included in his insurance he was in fact
covered for his work as a mechanic, not just standard insurance of trade
buying and selling that KGM as a rule only deals with. Ø This has been discussed with the underwriters
at KGM by Broadsure Direct re Martin Jenkins. Ø This also caused issues with his insurance
cover a few times. Ø This was also meant to have been address and
seems it was not. Ø At the time we were not happy as we were told
he was not covered when in fact he was. Ø If you call Broadsure Direct and speak to
Martin Jenkins, I feel that he can send you the paperwork and under writing
of how Simon’s insurance was meant to have been setup. Ø As you can see there was a number of issues
with his insurance with KGM that lead to problems. Ø and even with the issues of 14/11/2013 when
a call was made to Kelly Tiller, we asked did the police say what tools was
meant to have been in the van as if there were mechanic tools in there his
insurance should have in fact covered this. Ø Kelly Tiller said no the police officer did
not say which tools. Ø But also said he was again not insured for
this again Martin Jenkins got a rude call from us and again he had to make
calls to address this issue. Ø Can you please confirm he was correctly
insured with KGM and write this as I would like this addressed? Ø And one last thing could you please say in
your letter on the date of the 14/11/2013 he was fully insured just so
there cannot be any mistakes at court. Ø Sorry, this is causing such an issue and
taking up your time but I really want to have something that is fully
correct, as I do not want any other issues with courts, police and anything
else that could cause my Son problems. 1231, Regards Lorraine. From: Wood, Peter Mail To: Peter.Wood@canopius.com Sent: 30 January 2015 17:02 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew; Donovan, Paul Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Simon, Please find attached the following - Ø
Recording
of the original call made by the Police officer to KGM in which he advised
that there were tools in your van. Recording of the call between Kelly Tiller and
the Police compound in which Kelly was advised that Ø
there
were no tools in the vehicle. Ø
Receipt
showing purchase of the van. Ø
E-Mail
from Gareth Mullet from the compound confirming that there was nothing on the
seizure notice to indicate that there were any tools removed from the vehicle
or in the vehicle in the compound. Ø
Letter
of Indemnity for the CPS/Courts. Ø I believe
these are the relevant items you were after and hope this will assist you to
resolve the court matters. Ø If you
need anything else please let me know, or in my absence Andy Austin. Ø Paul
Donovan will respond separately in respect of your data request but hopefully
the attached will meet your requirements. Ø As soon as I
receive documentation from you to support costs incurred, Ø I can
consider our response on compensation. Ø No doubt
I will hear from you shortly, in the meantime have a good weekend. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 January 2015 11:14 To: Wood, Peter Cc: Austin, Andrew; complaints@lloyds.com Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter 1232,1233,1234,1235,1236,1237,1238,1239,1240, 1241,1242,1243,1244,1245,1246,1247, 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 413. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Case appeal / Page Numbers: 1248, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 January 2015 02:58 To: 'enquiries@cps.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: RE: Case appeal To Whom It May Concern: Ø I am writing this email to find out to whom I
would have to send information to within the CPS in regard to a case I was
found guilty off at Wimbledon magistrate’s court of driving without
insurance. Ø I put an appeal into Wimbledon magistrate’s
court on the same day, Ø which was accepted by the Judge hearing my
case in court. Ø I was told by the court and CPS if I got the
information that was needed to prove that I did in fact have insurance then I
could pass this to the CPS to look at. Ø I have yet to get the date of my appeal, but
do have the information from my insurance company that I feel will prove I
did in fact have insurance to drive on the day I was stopped by police and
would like to forward that over by email to the CPS to address. Ø Would it please be possible to get an email
address of where the data can be sent to so that this can be done? Regards Lorraine 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 433. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Public complaint by your son Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1408,1409, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 January 2015 17:43 To: 'Vicki.McQueen@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: Public complaint by
your son Simon Cordell Dear Victoria Ø Just giving you an update, we are still
waiting for an appeal date as to the no insurance case on the 14/11/2013
and the police officer lying to void my son’s insurance, and in his statement
and in fact to the judge under oath at the last hearing where my son was
found guilty. Ø I have had some documents and tapes sent to us
that will now prove this, which will be forwarded to the court who found him
guilty to prove the police office did in fact lie to the judge and CPS
dealing with this case where my son was found guilty. Ø As said in the complaint the police officer went
too far and lied, for what reason I do not know. Ø But then to lie in his statement and put force
facts, and then lie to the judge when the judge asked him about the tools he
lied to the judge’s face, I feel that the complaint will need updating to include
these facts. Ø It has taken a while to get the proof of this
fact, but we do now have it all. Ø I am hoping to deal with this on Monday with
the court and CPS, so I hope to have some more information about this
shortly. Regards From: Vicki.McQueen@met.pnn.police.uk [Mail To: Vicki.McQueen@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 11 December 2013
12:44 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Public complaint by
your son Simon Cordell Ms Cordell, Ø I tried to call you today to ask you a
question about your son's complaint. Ø I was unable to get hold of you. Ø Please can you reply and let me know if your
son is disputing his penalty notice or not. Ø If he has requested a Court hearing (which his
complaint would tend to indicate) the complaint will be classed as
'subjudice' Which means it will be put on hold until Court proceedings are
complete. Regards, Victoria McQueen Detective Sergeant Customer Service Team Metropolitan Police Service Directorate of Professional Standards Empress State Building SW61TR Tel; 02071616455 (786455) Met Sec Code Restricted 1409, Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We
are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our
environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and
are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk 50. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 50 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_01.31.2015_FW MT3574694
Simon Cordell 31/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 387,388,389,390 391,392,393,394,395,396 397,398,399,400,401,402 403,404,405,406,407,408 409,410,411,412,413 -- 387, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 31 January 2015 18:15 To: josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com Cc: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com Subject: FW: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Attachments: S Cordell 300115.pdf; s Cordell call from
police 141113.wma; Vanreciept10112013.jpg; MR SIMON CORDELL CX52 JRZ
(28.9 KB) 26_11_2013_13_53__KellyTiller
Kelly call to compound.wav Hi Josey Ø
I got the attached information
from Simon’s insurance company on Friday. Ø
After a lot of work to get it
and a lot of emails and over a year of time. Ø
The letter of Indemnity is not
correct with some points which I have asked peter wood to address. Ø
Simon has asked me to forward
this to you. Ø
The reason is this show how far
the police will go to lie. Ø
Not only did he lie to KGM
Simon’s insurance, about tools being in Simon’s van to void Simon insurance
cover and be able to seize his van. Ø
He then went on to lie in his
statement of facts to be used at court saying nothing about tools just that
the insurance said Simon’s was not covered by his insurance. Ø
He then stood up in court and
under oath when the judge asked him about tools being in the van said he did
not say tools was in the van. Ø
The reason the judge asked this
was he saw emails from KGM saying about the tools. Ø
Simon was found guilty of this
and we have taken it to appeal and are waiting on a date. Ø
But in the Asbo case can this
not be shown that the police will lie even under oath. Ø
They are trying to use Simon’s
char in the Asbo case and make him look bad. Ø
Why can we not show the police in
the same light by using this information? Ø
Simon has asked can you get the
case papers from the courts for this case and the Woolwich case. Ø
As these cases do show somewhat
how far the police are willing to go with Simon. Ø
In the Asbo case papers you have
police saying in their statement they know Simon is always insured it is on
police file how much he was stopped. Ø
Yet he has around 8 cases at
court for no insurance. Ø
In addition, most of these
cases he never had a summons for and they found him guilty due to him knowing
nothing about the case was due to be in court. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter mailto: Peter.Wood@canopius.com Sent: 30 January 2015 17:02 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew; Donovan, Paul Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Simon, Please find attached the following - Ø
Recording
of the original call made by the Police officer to KGM in which he advised
that there were tools in your van. Recording of the call between Kelly Tiller and
the Police compound in which Kelly was advised that Ø
there
were no tools in the vehicle. Ø
Receipt
showing purchase of the van. E-Mail from Gareth Mullet from the compound
confirming that there was nothing on the seizure notice to indicate that 388, Ø
there
were any tools removed from the vehicle or in the vehicle in the compound. Ø
Letter
of Indemnity for the CPS/Courts. Ø I believe
these are the relevant items you were after and hope this will assist you to
resolve the court matters. Ø If you
need anything else please let me know, or in my absence Andy Austin. Ø Paul
Donovan will respond separately in respect of your data request but hopefully
the attached will meet your requirements. Ø As soon as I
receive documentation from you to support costs incurred, Ø I can
consider our response on compensation. Ø No doubt
I will hear from you shortly, in the meantime have a good weekend. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 January 2015 11:14 To: Wood, Peter Cc: Austin, Andrew; complaints@lloyds.com Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø
Yes, please could you send the
tapes out and the Letter of Indemnity I would be most grateful as I think
this would cover the courts and would like to get the information to them as
soon as possible to the court and CPS. As for the other information that is
acceptable, Ø
as I not sure how long it will take
the police compound to send me over the information, Ø
I will need to send to you they
do take their time. Ø
I am just happy this matter is
getting address as said the most worrying thing was the court case and this
is the information I needed. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
leave. Ø
I look forward to hearing from
you and will pass the information over from the police compound as soon as I
have it. Regards Simon From: Wood, Peter [mailto: Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 27 January 2015 10:05 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Simon, 389, Ø I
spent some time last Friday tracking down a number of calls and did find the
original call that the Police made to Jessica and the calls Kelly made to the
Compound so we can provide these and it sounds like these are the important
calls from the CPS and Courts viewpoint. Ø I
will pass these over to our Data Protection Officer of course but will ask if
its ok for me to release them to you in the meantime before he does his
official response. Ø I
think we should also do the Letter of Indemnity and will send this across to
you in the next few days, there’s no reason why you can't send this across
now and it can do no harm. Ø I'm
conscious we have not done a formal final response yet to your complaint, Ø I
intend to do this as soon as we receive full details of the recovery costs
you incurred and can make a decision on compensation, Ø I
trust that’s acceptable. Ø If
you need anything else or have any questions in the meantime, please do not
hesitate to contact us. Ø I
am keeping Andy in the loop as I am due to go on leave from 12/2/15 ‐
8/3/15 Ø so,
he will need to pick up any issues that may arise during that time. Ø We
will be in touch shortly and await details from you as above in due course. King Regards Mr Peter Wood From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Date: 26 January 2015 23:10:04
GMT To: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Cc: complaints@lloyds.com <complaints@lloyds.com> Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Wood Ø
Thank you for picking this up
and taking the time to deal with this matter. Ø
The date of the appeal I do not
have yet. Ø
I are waiting for this but the
court and CPS said if I get the information needed before the court date then
it could be sent to the court who found me guilty and the CPS and this would
be linked to the case and addressed. In addition, there should be no need for
the appeal court case. Ø
I am trying to do this so that
a next day is not got to be wasted of my time in court and getting to and
from the court. Ø
The day that the police officer
pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which the police officer
lied, and the police officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is 14/11/2013.
Ø I
think due to what the police officer said in court the CPS and judge would
like to know the facts and Ø
what the police officer said on
that phone call to KGM. Ø
In addition, when KGM spoke to
the manager at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools,
I think the reason for this is the police officer committed perjury in the
court. Ø
That is why they asked me to
get proof that my insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements as to
what the police officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, in
addition, the facts how KGM found out I had in fact done nothing wrong and my
insurance should not be cancelled. 390, Ø
However, if you think a Letter
of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be done, Ø
I would be very grateful, but
could you include in the letter only reason this has come about is due to
what the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. Ø
In addition, this is the reason
KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the insurance
policy I had in force with them. Ø
This should cover it I hope as
I really did nothing wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied to
get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound and they told
her there was no tools. Ø
The vehicle registration I was
driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included
on my insurance. Ø
So, should have shown on the
database along with my car. Ø
However, none showed up as
being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me all the
problems with the police. Ø
As already aware yes, I was
stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized. I do have some of the
some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the
vehicle out of the compound for the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up
on the 16/11/2013. Ø
I have the ones for the 08/04/2013,
29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 Ø
I just need to get the receipts
for the other dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to
no insurance from the police compound. Ø
As for the Data Subject Access
Request, I am most grateful that this is being addressed. Ø
If I had known a fee was,
needed I would have paid that right away, but due to no one getting back to
me about the ones that were put in, I did not know a fee was needed. Regards Simon Cordell From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
Unfortunately,
Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have
picked this matter up. Ø
The
first order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case, can you confirm
when the date has been set for the hearing please? Ø
My
thought is that we provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically confirms that
you had a valid policy in force between said dates and on what vehicles, this
should satisfy the Courts but if they need anything else, we will be happy to
assist, just let me know what you require. Ø
I
understand you were stopped several times and had vehicles seized, you are in
the process of obtaining evidence of these vehicle seizures and the costs
incurred by you as a result for us to consider compensation. Ø
When
you have gathered this please forward the evidence to us as soon as possible. Ø
There
is also the matter of your Data Subject Access Request. Ø
I
have spent some time today tracking down recorded calls and various
communications and hove notified our Data Protection Officer of your request.
Ø
I
can see that you have made a request, any request should correctly be sent on
for the attention of the Data Protection Officer along with a £10 fee. Ø
Your
request was addressed generally to KGM with no fee and it would appear not
actioned. Ø
The
underwriter dealing with your request should have asked immediately for the
fee payment and escalated your request accordingly. Ø This was not done for which I must apologise, as
a 391, Ø
result
we will waive the fee requirement and I would confirm this is now in hand. Ø
We
have yet to issue a final response to your complaint and I would assure you
we will do this as soon as we have received your response to the above
points. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com <Andrew.Austin@canopius.com> Subject: FW: MT3574694 Dear Andrew Please see attached Insurance, which will show
you full details of his insurance policy and dates covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can
be sorted out by the court and I can send the information over to the CPS for
the case of the 14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools in
my van to void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and Jessica
know fully what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call from the
police officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my
policy and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and she was the
one that believed the police until I went to the police compound and spoke to
the manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not done this
Kelly Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have all the
emails to prove this. After Kelly Tiller found out I was not lying
about having no tools in my van the insurance policy was kept in place, I did
ask Kelly Tiller on more than once to send me the information and put data
requests in which was not replied to. Now I have been found guilty when Kelly
Tiller knows the truth that there was not tools and the police officer lied
to KGM on the phone call. 392, I am the one that has suffered over all this not
just on this case but all the times I have been taken to court for no
insurance over the year my policy run with KGM due to it not showing on the
MID database. You should have all the emails already from
Broadsure Direct and many was sent by them to KGM as I was told KGM could not
talk to me and I had to deal with Broadsure Direct about my policy Martin
Jenkins from Broadsure Direct should also have copies of all emails as I do. I have spoken to DVLA today and asked for the
data of how many times points was put on my licence due to not getting
summons from police and then dealing with cases I knew nothing about and then
I had to get the cases reopened, I have to write them a letter and they will
send the data I have asked for in the post. I do have a lot of letters which I will sort out
scan and send over. But the 1st part I want to deal with is the court case I
was found guilty at and have put an appeal in that is the most important to
me right now. We can deal with everything else once I get all
the data scanned as there is really a lot and it was all due to KGM not
sorting out why my insurance was not showing on the MID database. The seizers
alone have left me out of pocket by around £1700.00. That is without all the
days I have not been able to work due to my driving licence being messed up
and showing points for no insurance. All the time going back and forward to
the compound to collect my vehicles, and everything else I have had to deal
with the courts when in fact I had done nothing wrong. I have tried to deal with this for months and
months without going to the ombudsman and KGM has taken no notice, it has
taken me to go to the ombudsman for KGM to take any notice and I don’t feel
anyone would be happy with this sort of service from KGM let alone any
company doing this and causing someone so much suffering. It was one of the police in the end at the
compound who in the end worked 393, out why it was not showing up on the MID and that
was because there had been a space put within my Reg Numbers. It was that bad
two police compounds new me and said each time not again. As you can see, I am not very happy about all of
this, but I do not think anyone would be when they paid for their insurance
and had done nothing wrong to suffer all this. Therefore, could you please get the information I
need to send to the CPS; I have written what was needed from Nov 2014 and way
before this, and it still has not been sent and I have this hanging over my
head. I did not just get points on my licence I got disqualified from driving
for 6 months due to repeat offending of no insurance please tell me why when I
have paid for my insurance from KGM? The reason it has not been enforced is
due to me putting an appeal in. You can contact my mother on Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew [mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 16:13 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, 394, I have detailed the process for requesting information
under the subject access request and if you wish to proceed with this please
confirm. In the meantime, I am keen to assist you if I can
in confirming when cover was in force. Please can you confirm if there is a contact
number, I can call you or your Mother on and a time that is acceptable so
that I can try and help resolve this particular issue for you. I look forward to hearing from you with this
information. Regards, Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM
Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 | M 07469 147743 | <http://www.kgminsurance.co.uk/> www.kgminsurance.co.uk | <http://www.canopius.com/> www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Andrew I will forward this to you within a few days I
will ask the police compound to do a full print out as to all the tickets as
I believe there is a few 395, missing. I do have around 6 of the tickets here when the
vehicles were sized, I also do have court letters, and letters from DVLA, which
I will forward over to you once I have scanned then in so please give me a
few days and I will get back to you with this information as there is a lot
of data. The main one at this time I am worried about is
the case where the vehicle was sized due to the police lying and me being
found guilty at court you did have an email on the 30 November 2014 about
what was needed and I do have the court letter showing I was found guilty and
about the appeal. This data should have been given under the
Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 I put in, so was
wondering what you can do about this and if you will need a new Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in
so to do a 4th I do not feel I should need to do. KGM have in fact did not follow the protocol for
the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 which has been
put in 3 times already to KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information
Commissioner’s Office as I do not see any reason you would have to stop the
information, I have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact
guilty of no insurance. And now say to deal with this you need
information from me. I can understand you want the information for the
complaint that has been put in, but not the information I asked for to show I
was in fact I was insured for an appeal that is ongoing. And in fact, would
not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under the Data Protection
Act 1998 as I would not have been found guilty. I would like the data sent to the court as soon
as possible in regard to this so they can look at the facts and see if fact I
was insured so there should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more
of my time wasted going to court. Regards 396, Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew [mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell Thank you for your email. My letter dated 22/12/14 requests the following
documentary evidence from you With regards to any losses that may have been
incurred as a result of the above, I confirm as detailed in my previous
letter, I require the following: - 1. Confirmation of the points you raised to the
Financial Ombudsman when you verbally submitted your complaint and
the outcome you are looking to achieve. 2. Full details of the losses that you have incurred
as a direct result of your complaint and full documentary evidence supporting
this. 3. Confirmation of dates of any convictions or costs
imposed directly as a result of your complaint, including full documentary
evidence supporting this. Once I receive all of the above, I will be happy
to consider this further. 397, With regards to your subject access request. My
letter of the 9/12/14 advised the following: - Following our initial investigations, we note
that you submitted a subject access request to your Broker. Should you wish
to proceed with this, please can you formally request this in writing to our
Data Protection Officer at the address detailed at the foot of the letter
including a cheque payable to KGM Insurance for the sum of £10.00.
Alternatively, you may wish to wait until our full investigations have been
finalised. Can you please confirm how you wish to proceed
with that request? Should you not be in receipt of any of the
letters I refer to advise me above, please and I will ensure copies are sent
to you immediately. I await your reply Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM
Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 To Whom It May Concern: 398, I am writing due to the complaint I put in. I
have forwarded emails to Broadsure Direct and spoken to Broadsure Direct who
took the policy of insurance out policy no: MT3574694 I have been asking for information from KGM since
2013 and have heard nothing back. When the policy was taken out there was some
reason it did not show up on the MID database Broadsure Direct and KGM was
aware of this. Due to this fact I had my vehicles were sized a
number of times I believe 8 or 9 times in all, where I had to pay the costs
to get my vehicles out the compound each time. In the week when I was pulled
by police it was not so bad as the insurance company was opened so when I
showed the police my policy, they could call the insurance company. The seizers happened mostly at the weekend mostly
due to the insurance company being closed and the police could not talk to
anyone even when I had my policy on me at all times to prove I did in fact
have insurance. I made many calls to the police, Broadsure
Direct, KGM and the people who run the MID database, but the issue did not go
away, and my vehicles still did not show up on the MID database. There was also a time in Nov 2013 when my van was
sized this was due to KGM telling the police I was not insured due to the
police telling KGM that I had tools in my van. Which was a lie by the police
as I did not have anything in my van. Kelly Tiller from the trade section was
dealing with this and a few days later I got a letter from KGM saying they
was going to cancel my policy. As you can understand I was very upset over
this as I had done nothing wrong. At this time lots of calls was both made to KMG
and Broadsure to stop the cancelation of my insurance policy, I spoke to
Kelly Tiller many times, but she believed the police and I had no say in the
matter. The police were off -- 399,400,401,402,403,404,405,406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413, 51. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 51 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_01.31.2015_RE Case appeal 31/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 414 -- 414, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 31 January 2015 02:58 To: 'enquiries@cps.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: RE: Case appeal To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am writing this email to find
out to whom I would have to send information to within the CPS in regard to a
case I was found guilty off at Wimbledon magistrate’s court of driving
without insurance. Ø
I put an appeal into Wimbledon
magistrate’s court on the same day, Ø
which was accepted by the Judge
hearing my case in court. Ø
I was told by the court and CPS
if I got the information that was needed to prove that I did in fact have
insurance then I could pass this to the CPS to look at. Ø
I have yet to get the date of
my appeal, but do have the information from my insurance company that I feel
will prove I did in fact have insurance to drive on the day I was stopped by
police and would like to forward that over by email to the CPS to address. Ø
Would it please be possible to
get an email address of where the data can be sent to so that this can be
done? Regards Lorraine 52. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 52 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_01.31.2015_RE MT3574694
Simon Cordell 31/01/2015 / Page Numbers: 415,416,417,418,419,420 421,422,423,424,425,426 427,428,429,430,431,432 433 -- 415, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 31 January 2015 01:47 To: 'Wood, Peter' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Attachments: registration MA47LDY Corrected.pdf Dear Peter Ø
Thank you very much for the
information you have sent, I do see some errors in your letter of Indemnity.
Ø
This registration was always
put in not correctly but was in fact given to Broadsure Direct correctly. Ø
The registration should have
been Ford Zetec registration MA57LDY Ø
This was later correct after
the 3rd time of telling the Ford Zetec registration as MA57LDY Ø
please see attached document. Ø
This is the registration that
should have been on the policy from the start. Ø
We never knew it was not
correct until 08/04/13 when again the correct registration was given. Ø
However, it was put down as
Renault Clio registration NA57LDY, Ø
we then believe it was put in
correctly and not a new car added. Ø
We were not sent any documents
of that change so did not know there was again an error until the Oct 2013
when it was in fact corrected this time, we asked for new documents to be
sent which they were so we could check. Ø
But they kept on his policy
Renault Clio registration NA57LDY we made a next call and told them this
needed to be removed and was told it would be done. Ø
It seems this was never done by
what you have sent in your email. Ø
I do believe I have emails also
about this issue to Broadsure Direct and Martin Jenkins, can confirm this as
he was the one, we dealt with at Broadsure Direct. Ø
He also should remember all the
phone calls. Ø
There is also a next issue
Simon was not just covered with the basic trade insurance with KGM, Broadsure
Direct had a special section with KGM which included in his insurance he was
in fact covered for his work as a mechanic, not just standard insurance of
trade buying and selling that KGM as a rule only deals with. Ø
This has been discussed with
the underwriters at KGM by Broadsure Direct re Martin Jenkins. Ø
This also caused issues with
his insurance cover a few times. Ø
This was also meant to have
been address and seems it was not. Ø
At the time we were not happy
as we were told he was not covered when in fact he was. Ø
If you call Broadsure Direct
and speak to Martin Jenkins, I feel that he can send you the paperwork and
under writing of how Simon’s insurance was meant to have been setup. Ø
As you can see there was a
number of issues with his insurance with KGM that lead to problems. Ø
and even with the issues of 14/11/2013
when a call was made to Kelly Tiller, we asked did the police say what
tools was meant to have been in the van as if there were mechanic tools in
there his insurance should have in fact covered this. Ø
Kelly Tiller said no the police
officer did not say which tools. Ø
But also said he was again not
insured for this again Martin Jenkins got a rude call from us and again he
had to make calls to address this issue. Ø
Can you please confirm he was
correctly insured with KGM and write this as I would like this addressed? Ø
And one last thing could you
please say in your letter on the date of the 14/11/2013 he was fully
insured just so there cannot be any mistakes at court. Ø
Sorry, this is causing such an
issue and taking up your time but I really want to have something that is
fully correct, as I do not want any other issues with courts, police and
anything else that could cause my Son problems. 416, Regards Lorraine. From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 30 January 2015 17:02 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew; Donovan, Paul Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Simon, Please find attached the following - Ø
Recording
of the original call made by the Police officer to KGM in which he advised
that there were tools in your van. Recording of the call between Kelly Tiller and
the Police compound in which Kelly was advised that Ø
there
were no tools in the vehicle. Ø
Receipt
showing purchase of the van. Ø
E-Mail
from Gareth Mullet from the compound confirming that there was nothing on the
seizure notice to indicate that there were any tools removed from the vehicle
or in the vehicle in the compound. Ø
Letter
of Indemnity for the CPS/Courts. Ø I believe
these are the relevant items you were after and hope this will assist you to
resolve the court matters. Ø If you
need anything else please let me know, or in my absence Andy Austin. Ø Paul
Donovan will respond separately in respect of your data request but hopefully
the attached will meet your requirements. Ø As soon as I
receive documentation from you to support costs incurred, Ø I can
consider our response on compensation. Ø No doubt
I will hear from you shortly, in the meantime have a good weekend. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 January 2015 11:14 To: Wood, Peter Cc: Austin, Andrew; complaints@lloyds.com Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Ø Yes,
please could you send the tapes out and the Letter of Indemnity I would be
most grateful as I think this would cover the courts and would like to get
the information to them as soon as possible to the court and CPS. As for the
other information 417, that is acceptable, Ø
as I not sure how long it will
take the police compound to send me over the information, Ø
I will need to send to you they
do take their time. Ø
I am just happy this matter is
getting address as said the most worrying thing was the court case and this
is the information I needed. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
leave. Ø
I look forward to hearing from
you and will pass the information over from the police compound as soon as I
have it. Simon From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 27 January 2015 10:05 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Simon, Ø I
spent some time last Friday tracking down a number of calls and did find the
original call that the Police made to Jessica and the calls Kelly made to the
Compound so we can provide these and it sounds like these are the important
calls from the CPS and Courts viewpoint. Ø I
will pass these over to our Data Protection Officer of course but will ask if
its ok for me to release them to you in the meantime before he does his
official response. Ø I
think we should also do the Letter of Indemnity and will send this across to
you in the next few days, there’s no reason why you can't send this across
now and it can do no harm. Ø I'm
conscious we have not done a formal final response yet to your complaint, Ø I
intend to do this as soon as we receive full details of the recovery costs
you incurred and can make a decision on compensation, Ø I
trust that’s acceptable. Ø If
you need anything else or have any questions in the meantime, please do not
hesitate to contact us. Ø I
am keeping Andy in the loop as I am due to go on leave from 12/2/15 ‐
8/3/15 Ø so,
he will need to pick up any issues that may arise during that time. Ø We
will be in touch shortly and await details from you as above in due course. King Regards Mr Peter Wood From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Date: 26 January 2015 23:10:04
GMT To: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Cc: complaints@lloyds.com <complaints@lloyds.com> Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Wood Ø
Thank you for picking this up
and taking the time to deal with this matter. 418 Ø
The date of the appeal I do not
have yet. Ø
I are waiting for this but the court
and CPS said if I get the information needed before the court date then it
could be sent to the court who found me guilty and the CPS and this would be
linked to the case and addressed. In addition, there should be no need for
the appeal court case. Ø
I am trying to do this so that
a next day is not got to be wasted of my time in court and getting to and
from the court. Ø
The day that the police officer
pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which the police officer
lied, and the police officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is 14/11/2013.
Ø I
think due to what the police officer said in court the CPS and judge would
like to know the facts and Ø
what the police officer said on
that phone call to KGM. Ø
In addition, when KGM spoke to the
manager at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools, I
think the reason for this is the police officer committed perjury in the
court. Ø
That is why they asked me to
get proof that my insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements as to
what the police officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, in
addition, the facts how KGM found out I had in fact done nothing wrong and my
insurance should not be cancelled. Ø
However, if you think a Letter
of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be done, Ø
I would be very grateful, but
could you include in the letter only reason this has come about is due to
what the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. Ø
In addition, this is the reason
KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the insurance
policy I had in force with them. Ø
This should cover it I hope as
I really did nothing wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied to
get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound and they told
her there was no tools. Ø
The vehicle registration I was
driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included
on my insurance. Ø
So, should have shown on the
database along with my car. Ø
However, none showed up as
being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me all the
problems with the police. Ø
As already aware yes, I was
stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized. I do have some of the
some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the
vehicle out of the compound for the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up
on the 16/11/2013. Ø
I have the ones for the 08/04/2013,
29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 Ø
I just need to get the receipts
for the other dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to
no insurance from the police compound. Ø
As for the Data Subject Access
Request, I am most grateful that this is being addressed. Ø
If I had known a fee was,
needed I would have paid that right away, but due to no one getting back to
me about the ones that were put in, I did not know a fee was needed. Regards Simon Cordell From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19 To: Lorraine Cordell 419, Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
Unfortunately,
Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have
picked this matter up. Ø
The
first order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case, can you
confirm when the date has been set for the hearing please? Ø
My
thought is that we provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically confirms that
you had a valid policy in force between said dates and on what vehicles, this
should satisfy the Courts but if they need anything else, we will be happy to
assist, just let me know what you require. Ø
I
understand you were stopped several times and had vehicles seized, you are in
the process of obtaining evidence of these vehicle seizures and the costs
incurred by you as a result for us to consider compensation. Ø
When
you have gathered this please forward the evidence to us as soon as possible. Ø
There
is also the matter of your Data Subject Access Request. Ø
I
have spent some time today tracking down recorded calls and various
communications and hove notified our Data Protection Officer of your request.
Ø
I
can see that you have made a request, any request should correctly be sent on
for the attention of the Data Protection Officer along with a £10 fee. Ø
Your
request was addressed generally to KGM with no fee and it would appear not
actioned. Ø
The
underwriter dealing with your request should have asked immediately for the
fee payment and escalated your request accordingly. Ø This was not done for which I must apologise, as
a result we will waive the fee requirement and I would confirm this is now in
hand. Ø
We
have yet to issue a final response to your complaint and I would assure you
we will do this as soon as we have received your response to the above
points. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com <Andrew.Austin@canopius.com> Subject: FW: MT3574694 Dear Andrew Please see attached Insurance, which will show
you full details of his insurance policy and dates covered. 420, Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can be
sorted out by the court and I can send the information over to the CPS for
the case of the 14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools in
my van to void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and Jessica
know fully what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call from the
police officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my
policy and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and she was
the one that believed the police until I went to the police compound and
spoke to the manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not done
this Kelly Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have all
the emails to prove this. After Kelly Tiller found out I was not lying
about having no tools in my van the insurance policy was kept in place, I did
ask Kelly Tiller on more than once to send me the information and put data
requests in which was not replied to. Now I have been found guilty when Kelly
Tiller knows the truth that there was not tools and the police officer lied
to KGM on the phone call. I am the one that has suffered over all this not
just on this case but all the times I have been taken to court for no
insurance over the year my policy run with KGM due to it not showing on the
MID database. You should have all the emails already from
Broadsure Direct and many was sent by them to KGM as I was told KGM could not
talk to me and I had to deal with Broadsure Direct about my policy Martin
Jenkins from Broadsure Direct should also have copies of all emails as I do. I have spoken to DVLA today and asked for the
data of how many times points was put on my licence due to not getting
summons from police and then dealing with cases I knew nothing about and then
I had to get the cases reopened, I have to write them a letter and they will
send the data I have asked for in the post. I do have a lot of letters which I will sort out
scan and send over. But the 1st part I want to deal with is the court case I
was found guilty at and have put an appeal in that is the most important to
me right now. 421, We can deal with everything else once I get all
the data scanned as there is really a lot and it was all due to KGM not
sorting out why my insurance was not showing on the MID database. The seizers
alone have left me out of pocket by around £1700.00. That is without all the
days I have not been able to work due to my driving licence being messed up
and showing points for no insurance. All the time going back and forward to
the compound to collect my vehicles, and everything else I have had to deal
with the courts when in fact I had done nothing wrong. I have tried to deal with this for months and
months without going to the ombudsman and KGM has taken no notice, it has
taken me to go to the ombudsman for KGM to take any notice and I don’t feel
anyone would be happy with this sort of service from KGM let alone any
company doing this and causing someone so much suffering. It was one of the police in the end at the
compound who in the end worked out why it was not showing up on the MID and
that was because there had been a space put within my Reg Numbers. It was
that bad two police compounds new me and said each time not again. As you can see, I am not very happy about all of
this, but I do not think anyone would be when they paid for their insurance
and had done nothing wrong to suffer all this. Therefore, could you please get the information I
need to send to the CPS; I have written what was needed from Nov 2014 and way
before this, and it still has not been sent and I have this hanging over my
head. I did not just get points on my licence I got disqualified from driving
for 6 months due to repeat offending of no insurance please tell me why when
I have paid for my insurance from KGM? The reason it has not been enforced is
due to me putting an appeal in. You can contact my mother on 0208 245 7454 or
07961 833021 Regards -- 422,423,424,425,426,427,428,429,430,431,432,433, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Simulation February 2015
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
February
2015 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/02/2015 |
|
|
|
53. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 53 Peter.Wood@canopius.com_02.02.2015_RE MT3574694
Simon Cordell 02/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 434,435,436,437,438 439,440,441,442,443,444 445,446,447,448,449,450 451,452,453,454,455 2 I was at appeal for? My driving license and I won the case! Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 436. Wood, Peter _Re_
MT3574694 Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1445,1446,1447,1448,1449,1450,1451,1452, 1453,1454,1455,1456,1457,1458,1459,1460,1461,1462,1463 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 437. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1464,1465,1466,1467,1468,1469,1470,1471, 1472,1473,1474,1475,1476,1477,1478,1479,1480,1481,1482 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 5 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 438. Wood, Peter _Re_
MT3574694 Simon Cordell_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1483,1484,1485,1486,1487,1488,1489,1490, 1491,1492,1493,1494,1495,1496,1497,1498,1499,1500,1501 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
02/02/2015 |
15:48:00 |
X22 434,435,436 437,438,439,440 441,442,443,444 445,446,447,448 449,450,451,452 453,454,455, |
|
|
53. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 53 Peter.Wood@canopius.com_02.02.2015_RE MT3574694
Simon Cordell 02/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 434,435,436,437,438 439,440,441,442,443,444 445,446,447,448,449,450 451,452,453,454,455 -- 434, From: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Sent: 02 February 2015 15:48 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Attachments: S Cordell 020215.pdf Dear Lorraine, Ø
Please review the
attached revised LOI, Ø
once you confirm you
are happy with it, Ø
I will put an
original in the post today. Ø
I think that's it
for now but just shout if you need anything else. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of
Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close
| London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 02 February 2015 15:08 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø
Thank you for the
reply to my email Ø
Yes, the below would
cover everything I feel, Ø
so, if you can go
ahead and do this, I would be most grateful. Ø
As said, I just do
not want any way that the CSP and Court could have any confusion with
anything. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter mailto: Peter.Wood@canopius.com Sent: 02 February 2015 14:56 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin,
Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Lorraine, Ø Thanks for your comments, don’t worry I want
to get this resolved as much as you and Simon, it’s taken far too Ø long already, so before I send an amended
Indemnity Letter (LOI) please confirm my understanding as listed below – Ø I will amend the registration of the Ford Zetec
to show MA57LDY. Broadsure originally gave us the incorrect registration and
as you say it was a while before this error was corrected and our policy
history was confusing due to the incorrect Clio that I was not aware of
previously. Ø You are correct, looking back on the instructions
from Broadsure I cannot see that they instructed Underwriters to delete the
Renault Clio that was added in error following receipt of advices from
Broadsure. Ø I can amend the comment in the 435, Ø letter to show that this vehicle was added to the
policy incorrectly following an effort on your part to correct the
registration number of the Ford Zetec and was a broker error, are you happy
with this? Ø The letter states cover was for Social Domestic
& Pleasure and Motor Trade Use. Ø Motor Trade use would cover Simon to carry a
Motor Mechanics tools being used in connection with Motor Trade but not any
tools that would typically be used for any other purposes such as perhaps,
paint/brushes/ladders/plumbing/Electrical (domestic/commercial except auto
electrical) and so on. Ø This is standard cover; however, I am happy to
expand on this statement in the letter if you would like me to in order to
clarify that point? Ø The Police officer asked if Simon would be
covered for the carriage of tools to drive around doing “odd jobs”. Ø Later in the call he again confirmed that Simon
was not covered “to drive around doing jobs”. Ø I sent you the call so you can listen to it
yourself but the tone of the enquiry was suggesting that Simon was doing jobs
not connected to the Motor Trade however I do feel there is plenty of room
here for misunderstanding. Ø If the question had been more specific with the
officer stating that Simon had tools connected with the Motor Trade in the
vehicle would he be covered – Yes. Ø If he said that the tools were not connected to
the Motor Trade (as per my comments above) then the answer is – No. Ø Not something I can put into a Letter of
Indemnity but certainly something to be argued with the CPS/Courts. Ø I’m happy to confirm in the letter that cover was
in force under this policy on the 14/11/2013. Ø Once I hear back from you, I will revise the LOI
accordingly and e‐mail it across for you to sign off, I will also send
an original in the post just in case! If you need anything else please do not
hesitate to drop me and Andy a line, I am keeping Andy in the loop as I will
be on leave from 12/2/15 – 9/3/15 so he will need to deal with
anything in my absence. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of
Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close
| London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 31 January 2015 01:47 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø
Thank you very much for the
information you have sent, I do see some errors in your letter of Indemnity.
Ø
This registration was always
put in not correctly but was in fact given to Broadsure Direct correctly. Ø
The registration should have
been Ford Zetec registration MA57LDY Ø
This was later correct after
the 3rd time of telling the Ford Zetec registration as MA57LDY Ø
please see attached document. Ø
This is the registration that
should have been on the policy from the start. Ø
We never knew it was not
correct until 08/04/13 when again the correct registration was given. 436, Ø
However, it was put down as
Renault Clio registration NA57LDY, Ø
we then believe it was put in
correctly and not a new car added. Ø
We were not sent any documents
of that change so did not know there was again an error until the Oct 2013
when it was in fact corrected this time, we asked for new documents to be
sent which they were so we could check. Ø
But they kept on his policy
Renault Clio registration NA57LDY we made a next call and told them this
needed to be removed and was told it would be done. Ø
It seems this was never done by
what you have sent in your email. Ø
I do believe I have emails also
about this issue to Broadsure Direct and Martin Jenkins, can confirm this as
he was the one, we dealt with at Broadsure Direct. Ø
He also should remember all the
phone calls. Ø
There is also a next issue
Simon was not just covered with the basic trade insurance with KGM, Broadsure
Direct had a special section with KGM which included in his insurance he was
in fact covered for his work as a mechanic, not just standard insurance of
trade buying and selling that KGM as a rule only deals with. Ø
This has been discussed with
the underwriters at KGM by Broadsure Direct re Martin Jenkins. Ø
This also caused issues with
his insurance cover a few times. Ø
This was also meant to have
been address and seems it was not. Ø
At the time we were not happy
as we were told he was not covered when in fact he was. Ø
If you call Broadsure Direct
and speak to Martin Jenkins, I feel that he can send you the paperwork and
under writing of how Simon’s insurance was meant to have been setup. Ø
As you can see there was a
number of issues with his insurance with KGM that lead to problems. Ø
and even with the issues of 14/11/2013
when a call was made to Kelly Tiller, we asked did the police say what
tools was meant to have been in the van as if there were mechanic tools in
there his insurance should have in fact covered this. Ø
Kelly Tiller said no the police
officer did not say which tools. Ø
But also said he was again not
insured for this again Martin Jenkins got a rude call from us and again he
had to make calls to address this issue. Ø
Can you please confirm he was
correctly insured with KGM and write this as I would like this addressed? Ø
And one last thing could you
please say in your letter on the date of the 14/11/2013 he was fully
insured just so there cannot be any mistakes at court. Ø
Sorry, this is causing such an
issue and taking up your time but I really want to have something that is
fully correct, as I do not want any other issues with courts, police and
anything else that could cause my Son problems. Regards Lorraine. From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 30 January 2015 17:02 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew; Donovan, Paul Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Attachments: RE: MT3574694 S
Cordell 300115.pdf; s Cordell call from police 141113.wma; Van-reciept-10-11-2013.jpg; MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ (28.9 KB); 26_H_2013_13_53_KellyTiller Kelly call to compound.wav Dear Simon, Please find attached the following - Ø
Recording
of the original call made by the Police officer to KGM in which he advised
that there were tools in your van. Recording of the call between Kelly Tiller and
the Police compound in which Kelly was advised that Ø
there
were no tools in the vehicle. Ø
Receipt
showing purchase of the van. Ø
E-Mail
from Gareth Mullet from the compound confirming that there was nothing on the
seizure notice to indicate that there were any tools removed from the vehicle
or in the vehicle in the compound. Ø
Letter
of Indemnity for the CPS/Courts. Ø I believe
these are the relevant items you were after and hope this will assist you to
resolve the court matters. Ø If you
need anything else please let me know, or in my absence Andy Austin. 437, Ø Paul
Donovan will respond separately in respect of your data request but hopefully
the attached will meet your requirements. Ø As soon as I
receive documentation from you to support costs incurred, Ø I can
consider our response on compensation. Ø No doubt
I will hear from you shortly, in the meantime have a good weekend. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 January 2015 11:14 To: Wood, Peter Cc: Austin, Andrew; complaints@lloyds.com Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø
Yes, please could you send the
tapes out and the Letter of Indemnity I would be most grateful as I think
this would cover the courts and would like to get the information to them as
soon as possible to the court and CPS. As for the other information that is
acceptable, Ø
as I not sure how long it will
take the police compound to send me over the information, Ø
I will need to send to you they
do take their time. Ø
I am just happy this matter is
getting address as said the most worrying thing was the court case and this
is the information I needed. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
leave. Ø
I look forward to hearing from
you and will pass the information over from the police compound as soon as I
have it. Regards Simon From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 27 January 2015 10:05 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Simon, Ø I
spent some time last Friday tracking down a number of calls and did find the
original call that the Police made to Jessica and the calls Kelly made to the
Compound so we can provide these and it sounds like these are the important
calls from the CPS and Courts viewpoint. Ø I
will pass these over to our Data Protection Officer of course but will ask if
its ok for me to release them to you in the meantime before he does his
official response. 438, Ø I
think we should also do the Letter of Indemnity and will send this across to
you in the next few days, there’s no reason why you can't send this across
now and it can do no harm. Ø I'm
conscious we have not done a formal final response yet to your complaint, Ø I
intend to do this as soon as we receive full details of the recovery costs
you incurred and can make a decision on compensation, Ø I
trust that’s acceptable. Ø If
you need anything else or have any questions in the meantime, please do not
hesitate to contact us. Ø I
am keeping Andy in the loop as I am due to go on leave from 12/2/15 ‐
8/3/15 Ø so,
he will need to pick up any issues that may arise during that time. Ø We
will be in touch shortly and await details from you as above in due course. King Regards Mr Peter Wood From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Date: 26 January 2015 23:10:04
GMT To: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Cc: complaints@lloyds.com <complaints@lloyds.com> Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Wood Ø
Thank you for picking this up
and taking the time to deal with this matter. Ø
The date of the appeal I do not
have yet. Ø
I are waiting for this but the
court and CPS said if I get the information needed before the court date then
it could be sent to the court who found me guilty and the CPS and this would
be linked to the case and addressed. In addition, there should be no need for
the appeal court case. Ø
I am trying to do this so that
a next day is not got to be wasted of my time in court and getting to and
from the court. Ø
The day that the police officer
pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which the police officer
lied, and the police officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is 14/11/2013.
Ø I
think due to what the police officer said in court the CPS and judge would
like to know the facts and Ø
what the police officer said on
that phone call to KGM. Ø
In addition, when KGM spoke to
the manager at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools,
I think the reason for this is the police officer committed perjury in the
court. Ø
That is why they asked me to
get proof that my insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements as to
what the police officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, in
addition, the facts how KGM found out I had in fact done nothing wrong and my
insurance should not be cancelled. Ø
However, if you think a Letter
of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be done, Ø
I would be very grateful, but
could you include in the letter only reason this has come about is due to
what the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. Ø
In addition, this is the reason
KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the insurance
policy I had in force with them. 439, Ø
This should cover it I hope as
I really did nothing wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied to
get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound and they told
her there was no tools. Ø
The vehicle registration I was
driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included
on my insurance. Ø
So, should have shown on the
database along with my car. Ø
However, none showed up as
being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me all the
problems with the police. Ø
As already aware yes, I was
stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized. I do have some of the
some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the
vehicle out of the compound for the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up
on the 16/11/2013. Ø
I have the ones for the 08/04/2013,
29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 Ø
I just need to get the receipts
for the other dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to
no insurance from the police compound. Ø
As for the Data Subject Access
Request, I am most grateful that this is being addressed. Ø
If I had known a fee was,
needed I would have paid that right away, but due to no one getting back to
me about the ones that were put in, I did not know a fee was needed. Regards Simon Cordell From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
Unfortunately,
Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have
picked this matter up. Ø
The
first order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case, can you
confirm when the date has been set for the hearing please? Ø
My thought
is that we provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically confirms that you had
a valid policy in force between said dates and on what vehicles, this should
satisfy the Courts but if they need anything else, we will be happy to
assist, just let me know what you require. Ø
I
understand you were stopped several times and had vehicles seized, you are in
the process of obtaining evidence of these vehicle seizures and the costs
incurred by you as a result for us to consider compensation. Ø
When
you have gathered this please forward the evidence to us as soon as possible. Ø
There
is also the matter of your Data Subject Access Request. Ø
I
have spent some time today tracking down recorded calls and various
communications and hove notified our Data Protection Officer of your request.
Ø
I
can see that you have made a request, any request should correctly be sent on
for the attention of the Data Protection Officer along with a £10 fee. Ø
Your
request was addressed generally to KGM with no fee and it would appear not
actioned. Ø
The
underwriter dealing with your request should have asked immediately for the
fee payment and escalated your request accordingly. Ø
This
was not done for which I must apologise, as a result we will waive the fee
requirement and I would confirm this is now in hand. Ø
We
have yet to issue a final response to your complaint and I would assure you
we will do this as soon as we have received your response to the above
points. 440, Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> To: Andrew.Austin@,canopius.com <Andrew.Austin@canopius.com> Subject: FW: MT3574694 Dear Andrew Please see attached Insurance, which will show
you full details of his insurance policy and dates covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can
be sorted out by the court and I can send the information over to the CPS for
the case of the 14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools in
my van to void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and Jessica
know fully what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call from the
police officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my
policy and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and she was
the one that believed the police until I went to the police compound and
spoke to the manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not done
this Kelly Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have all
the emails to prove this. After Kelly Tiller found out I was not lying
about having no tools in my van the insurance policy was kept in place, I did
ask Kelly Tiller on more than once to send me the information and put data
requests in which was not replied to. Now I have been found guilty when Kelly
Tiller knows the truth that there was not tools and the police officer lied
to KGM on the phone call. I am the one that has suffered over all this not
just on this case but all 441, the times I have been taken to court for no
insurance over the year my policy run with KGM due to it not showing on the
MID database. You should have all the emails already from
Broadsure Direct and many was sent by them to KGM as I was told KGM could not
talk to me and I had to deal with Broadsure Direct about my policy Martin
Jenkins from Broadsure Direct should also have copies of all emails as I do. I have spoken to DVLA today and asked for the
data of how many times points was put on my licence due to not getting
summons from police and then dealing with cases I knew nothing about and then
I had to get the cases reopened, I have to write them a letter and they will
send the data I have asked for in the post. I do have a lot of letters which I will sort out
scan and send over. But the 1st part I want to deal with is the court case I
was found guilty at and have put an appeal in that is the most important to
me right now. We can deal with everything else once I get all
the data scanned as there is really a lot and it was all due to KGM not
sorting out why my insurance was not showing on the MID database. The seizers
alone have left me out of pocket by around £1700.00. That is without all the
days I have not been able to work due to my driving licence being messed up
and showing points for no insurance. All the time going back and forward to
the compound to collect my vehicles, and everything else I have had to deal
with the courts when in fact I had done nothing wrong. I have tried to deal with this for months and
months without going to the ombudsman and KGM has taken no notice, it has
taken me to go to the ombudsman for KGM to take any notice and I don’t feel
anyone would be happy with this sort of service from KGM let alone any
company doing this and causing someone so much suffering. It was one of the police in the end at the
compound who in the end worked out why it was not showing up on the MID and
that was because there had been a space put within my Reg Numbers. It was
that bad two police compounds new me and said each time not again. 442, As you can see, I am not very happy about all of
this, but I do not think anyone would be when they paid for their insurance
and had done nothing wrong to suffer all this. Therefore, could you please get the information I
need to send to the CPS; I have written what was needed from Nov 2014 and way
before this, and it still has not been sent and I have this hanging over my
head. I did not just get points on my licence I got disqualified from driving
for 6 months due to repeat offending of no insurance please tell me why when
I have paid for my insurance from KGM? The reason it has not been enforced is
due to me putting an appeal in. You can contact my mother on Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew [mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com] Sent: 21 January 2015 16:13 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, I have detailed the process for requesting
information under the subject access request and if you wish to proceed with
this please confirm. 443, In the meantime, I am keen to assist you if I can
in confirming when cover was in force. Please can you confirm if there is a contact
number, I can call you or your Mother on and a time that is acceptable so
that I can try and help resolve this particular issue for you. I look forward to hearing from you with this
information. Regards, Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM Motor
Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 | M 07469 147743 | <http://www.kgminsurance.co.uk/> www.kgminsurance.co.uk | <http://www.canopius.com/> www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Andrew I will forward this to you within a few days I
will ask the police compound to do a full print out as to all the tickets as
I believe there is a few missing. I do have around 6 of the tickets here when the
vehicles were sized, I also do have court letters, and letters from DVLA,
which I will forward over to 444, you once I have scanned then in so please give me
a few days and I will get back to you with this information as there is a lot
of data. The main one at this time I am worried about is
the case where the vehicle was sized due to the police lying and me being
found guilty at court you did have an email on the 30 November 2014 about
what was needed and I do have the court letter showing I was found guilty and
about the appeal. This data should have been given under the
Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 I put in, so was
wondering what you can do about this and if you will need a new Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in
so to do a 4th I do not feel I should need to do. KGM have in fact did not follow the protocol for
the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 which has been
put in 3 times already to KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information
Commissioner’s Office as I do not see any reason you would have to stop the
information, I have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact
guilty of no insurance. And now say to deal with this you need
information from me. I can understand you want the information for the
complaint that has been put in, but not the information I asked for to show I
was in fact I was insured for an appeal that is ongoing. And in fact, would
not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under the Data Protection
Act 1998 as I would not have been found guilty. I would like the data sent to the court as soon
as possible in regard to this so they can look at the facts and see if fact I
was insured so there should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more
of my time wasted going to court. Regards Simon Cordell 445, From: Austin, Andrew [mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell Thank you for your email. My letter dated 22/12/14 requests the following documentary
evidence from you With regards to any losses that may have been
incurred as a result of the above, I confirm as detailed in my previous
letter, I require the following: - · Confirmation of the points you raised to the
Financial Ombudsman when you verbally submitted your complaint and
the outcome you are looking to achieve. · Full details of the losses that you have incurred
as a direct result of your complaint and full documentary evidence supporting
this. · Confirmation of dates of any convictions or costs
imposed directly as a result of your complaint, including full documentary
evidence supporting this. Once I receive all of the above, I will be happy
to consider this further. With regards to your subject access request. My
letter of the 9/12/14 advised the following: - 446, Following our initial investigations, we note
that you submitted a subject access request to your Broker. Should you wish
to proceed with this, please can you formally request this in writing to our
Data Protection Officer at the address detailed at the foot of the letter
including a cheque payable to KGM Insurance for the sum of £10.00.
Alternatively, you may wish to wait until our full investigations have been
finalised. Can you please confirm how you wish to proceed
with that request? Should you not be in receipt of any of the
letters I refer to advise me above, please and I will ensure copies are sent
to you immediately. I await your reply Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM
Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ From: Lorraine Cordell mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing due to the complaint I put in. I
have forwarded emails to Broadsure Direct and spoken to Broadsure Direct who
took the policy of insurance out policy no: MT3574694 447, I have been asking for information from KGM since
2013 and have heard nothing back. When the policy was taken out there was some
reason it did not show up on the MID database Broadsure Direct and KGM was
aware of this. Due to this fact I had my vehicles were sized a
number of times I believe 8 or 9 times in all, where I had to pay the costs
to get my vehicles out the compound each time. In the week when I was pulled
by police it was not so bad as the insurance company was opened so when I
showed the police my policy, they could call the insurance company. The seizers happened mostly at the weekend mostly
due to the insurance company being closed and the police could not talk to
anyone even when I had my policy on me at all times to prove I did in fact
have insurance. I made many calls to the police, Broadsure
Direct, KGM and the people who run the MID database, but the issue did not go
away, and my vehicles still did not show up on the MID database. There was also a time in Nov 2013 when my van was
sized this was due to KGM telling the police I was not insured due to the
police telling KGM that I had tools in my van. Which was a lie by the police
as I did not have anything in my van. Kelly Tiller from the trade section was
dealing with this and a few days later I got a letter from KGM saying they
was going to cancel my policy. As you can understand I was very upset over
this as I had done nothing wrong. At this time lots of calls was both made to KMG
and Broadsure to stop the cancelation of my insurance policy, I spoke to
Kelly Tiller many times, but she believed the police and I had no say in the
matter. The police were off duty so I could not speak to them and Kelly
Tiller was saying unless I could prove I did not have any tools in my van
then the insurance policy would be cancelled which was very unfair as I had
done nothing wrong, I knew I never had any tools. 448, But I also asked Kelly Tiller did the police tell
her what tools was meant to be in my van, to which she said no. KGM was not
even aware I had mechanics trade on my policy so if my mechanics tools had
been in my van at the time my insurance would still have been cancelled which
to me what was the point in having insurance? I then spoke to a wonderful operator at the
police when I called told her what had gone on and was told by her to go to
the police compound as when any vehicles are taken there, they have to do a
full list of items that are in the vehicles as they are in fact legible if
something goes missing. Over that weekend I sent emails to the compound and
forwarded them to Broadsure as my insurance was due to be cancelled on the
Monday. On Monday I got an email from Broadsure direct asking me to go to the
compound as Kelly Tiller had no luck getting a reply from them also, and once
there to call Kelly Tiller due to the time on the Monday I got the email it
would have been too late to go the compound and get a call to Kelly Tiller as
she would have ended work for that day so I sent an email saying I would be
going there early the next morning. I went the next day and asked to speak to the
manager of the compound who in fact looked up my van and said nothing was in
there, there was not tools I called Kelly Tiller and the manager of the
compound spoke to her and confirmed there was nothing in the van when it was
taken there by police and that I had put thing in the van when I had taken it
out of the compound. At this point Kelly tiller believed me and said
the policy would not be cancelled. But on my way back from the compound
driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and it was Broadsure direct
saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was very upset at this and told
them what had happened, I was asked to hold on they was called KGM back and
would call me right back. I waited till Broadsure direct called me back and
confirmed my insurance policy had not been cancelled then drove home. From this point I have been asking for all
information and putting data protection acts in which have not been dealt
with and I have heard nothing from KGM. 449, I have been back and forward to court due to no
insurance and in fact 4 cases I did not get any summons so was in fact found
guilty as I did not know it was even going to court. I have had points put on my driving licence for
no reason and had to go back and forward to court many times when this should
not have been the case. Then the case come up for the seizer when the
police said I had tools in my van I went to court with all my documents but
due to not having the information I had asked for from KGM many times about
that case I was found guilty. I am very upset about the whole policy with
KGM. I have put an appeal in, and this case will be going to crown court I
have again asked for information and again heard nothing. These matters need
to be addressed as I am suffering due to all of this. Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows
everything that has gone on as he was my main contact. I also have all the emails the last one that I
will enclose again, which I have heard nothing about and the 1st Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the
26/11/2013. I did in fact send the Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998 about time times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into
why I had heard nothing about more than once. Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I
will ask the court to summons the people at KGM to deal with this matter as
they know I was insurance and did nothing wrong and the police lied. All I
have asked for is the data so there will be no need to summons people this
way I can send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown and the
other information and this case should be dropped against me. It just seemed that KGM does not want to do
anything and give me the information I need to prove in fact I was insurance
and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it that I was not insurance. 450, There is a lot more I could say about the
insurance I had with KGM, but this insurance policy was my worst nightmare.
It has messed my clean driving licence up and in fact got to the point I
could not drive so could not work. Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the
information over that was needed to prove I did have insurance. If you need o can send over all the emails that
has been sent back and forward to Broadsure who sent them to KGM. I have lost a lot of money, and time due to this
insurance policy I have had to pay for my vehicles to be taken out of the
police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost of £180.00 to £200.00 a time.
All the loss of work due to having to take time to go to the police compound,
and all the times I have had to go to court for no insurance when in fact I
had insurance. And points put on my driving licence to the fact I could not
drive, this has all been costs to myself. My Mother Lorraine Cordell has also written many
of the emails and is fine with dealing with this issue. Regards Simon Cordell 451, Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents
Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number
02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered 452, in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents
Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number
02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited 453, Canopius Services Limited | registered number
02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One
Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One
Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number
02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales 454,
End of Picture! 455,
End of Picture! 2 I was at appeal for? Ø My driving license
and I won the case! Ø
When
I got home, stain started to bang on his kitchen wall at me for hours I tried
to ask home to stop but he bet ends that it was not him, but I am 100% sure
it was! 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 436. Wood, Peter _Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell_
(1) / Page Numbers: 1445,1446,1447,1448,1449,1450,1451,1452, 1453,1454,1455,1456,1457,1458,1459,1460,1461,1462,1463, From: Wood, Peter [Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 02
February 2015 14:56 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Lorraine, Ø
Thanks for your comments, don’t
worry I want to get this resolved as much as you and Simon, it’s taken far
too Ø
long already, so before I send
an amended Indemnity Letter (LOI) please confirm my understanding as listed
below – Ø I
will amend the registration of the Ford Zetec to show MA57LDY. Broadsure
originally gave us the incorrect registration and as you say it was a while
before this error was corrected and our policy history was confusing due to
the incorrect Clio that I was not aware of previously. Ø You
are correct, looking back on the instructions from Broadsure I cannot see
that they instructed Underwriters to delete the Renault
Clio that was added in error following receipt of advices from Broadsure.
Ø I
can amend the comment in the letter to show that this vehicle was added to
the policy incorrectly following an effort on your part to correct the
registration number of the Ford Zetec and was a broker error, are you happy
with this? Ø The
letter states cover was for Social Domestic & Pleasure and Motor Trade
Use. Ø Motor
Trade use would cover Simon to carry a Motor Mechanics tools being used in
connection with Motor Trade but not any tools that would typically be used
for any other purposes such as perhaps,
paint/brushes/ladders/plumbing/Electrical (domestic/commercial except auto
electrical) and so on. Ø This
is standard cover; however, I am happy to expand on this statement in the
letter if you would like me to in order to clarify that point? Ø The
Police officer asked if Simon would be covered for the carriage of tools to
drive around doing “odd jobs”. Ø Later
in the call he again confirmed that Simon was not covered “to drive around
doing jobs”. Ø I
sent you the call so you can listen to it yourself but the tone of the
enquiry was suggesting that Simon was doing jobs not connected to the Motor
Trade however I do feel there is plenty of room here for misunderstanding. Ø If
the question had been more specific with the officer stating that Simon had
tools connected with the Motor Trade in the vehicle would he be covered –
Yes. Ø If
he said that the tools were not connected to the Motor Trade (as per my
comments above) then the answer is – No. Ø Not
something I can put into a Letter of Indemnity but certainly something to be
argued with the CPS/Courts. Ø I’m
happy to confirm in the letter that cover was in force under this policy on
the 14/11/2013. Ø Once
I hear back from you, I will revise the LOI accordingly and e‐mail it
across for you to sign off, I will also send an original in the post just in
case! If you need anything else please do not hesitate to drop me and Andy a
line, I am keeping Andy in the loop as I will be on leave from 12/2/15 –
9/3/15 so he will need to deal with anything in my absence. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of
Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 January 2015 01:47 To:
Wood,
Peter 1446, Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø
Thank you very much for the
information you have sent, I do see some errors in your letter of Indemnity.
Ø
This registration was always
put in not correctly but was in fact given to Broadsure Direct correctly. Ø
The registration should have
been Ford Zetec registration MA57LDY Ø
This was later correct after
the 3rd time of telling the Ford Zetec registration as MA57LDY Ø
please see attached document. Ø
This is the registration that
should have been on the policy from the start. Ø
We never knew it was not
correct until 08/04/13 when again the correct registration was given. Ø
However, it was put down as
Renault Clio registration NA57LDY, Ø
we then believe it was put in
correctly and not a new car added. Ø
We were not sent any documents
of that change so did not know there was again an error until the Oct 2013
when it was in fact corrected this time, we asked for new documents to be
sent which they were so we could check. Ø
But they kept on his policy
Renault Clio registration NA57LDY we made a next call and told them this
needed to be removed and was told it would be done. Ø
It seems this was never done by
what you have sent in your email. Ø
I do believe I have emails also
about this issue to Broadsure Direct and Martin Jenkins, can confirm this as
he was the one, we dealt with at Broadsure Direct. Ø
He also should remember all the
phone calls. Ø
There is also a next issue
Simon was not just covered with the basic trade insurance with KGM, Broadsure
Direct had a special section with KGM which included in his insurance he was
in fact covered for his work as a mechanic, not just standard insurance of
trade buying and selling that KGM as a rule only deals with. Ø
This has been discussed with
the underwriters at KGM by Broadsure Direct re Martin Jenkins. Ø
This also caused issues with
his insurance cover a few times. Ø
This was also meant to have
been address and seems it was not. Ø
At the time we were not happy
as we were told he was not covered when in fact he was. Ø
If you call Broadsure Direct
and speak to Martin Jenkins, I feel that he can send you the paperwork and
under writing of how Simon’s insurance was meant to have been setup. Ø
As you can see there was a
number of issues with his insurance with KGM that lead to problems. Ø
and even with the issues of 14/11/2013
when a call was made to Kelly Tiller, we asked did the police say what
tools was meant to have been in the van as if there were mechanic tools in
there his insurance should have in fact covered this. Ø
Kelly Tiller said no the police
officer did not say which tools. Ø
But also said he was again not
insured for this again Martin Jenkins got a rude call from us and again he
had to make calls to address this issue. Ø
Can you please confirm he was
correctly insured with KGM and write this as I would like this addressed? Ø
And one last thing could you
please say in your letter on the date of the 14/11/2013 he was fully
insured just so there cannot be any mistakes at court. Ø
Sorry, this is causing such an
issue and taking up your time but I really want to have something that is
fully correct, as I do not want any other issues with courts, police and
anything else that could cause my Son problems. Regards Lorraine. 1447, From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 30 January 2015 17:02 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew; Donovan, Paul Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Simon, Please find attached the following - Ø
Recording
of the original call made by the Police officer to KGM in which he advised
that there were tools in your van. Ø
Recording
of the call between Kelly Tiller and the Police compound in which Kelly was
advised that there were no tools in the vehicle. Ø
Receipt
showing purchase of the van. Ø
E-Mail
from Gareth Mullet from the compound confirming that there was nothing on the
seizure notice to indicate that there were any tools removed from the vehicle
or in the vehicle in the compound. Ø
Letter
of Indemnity for the CPS/Courts. Ø I believe
these are the relevant items you were after and hope this will assist you to
resolve the court matters. Ø If you
need anything else please let me know, or in my absence Andy Austin. Ø Paul
Donovan will respond separately in respect of your data request but hopefully
the attached will meet your requirements. Ø As soon as I
receive documentation from you to support costs incurred, Ø I can
consider our response on compensation. Ø No doubt
I will hear from you shortly, in the meantime have a good weekend. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 January 2015 11:14 To: Wood, Peter Cc: Austin, Andrew; complaints@lloyds.com Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø
Yes, please could you send the
tapes out and the Letter of Indemnity I would be most grateful as I think
this would cover the courts and would like to get the information to them as
soon as possible to the court and CPS. As for the other information that is
acceptable, Ø
as I not sure how long it will
take the police compound to send me over the information, Ø
I will need to send to you they
do take their time. Ø
I am just happy this matter is
getting address as said the most worrying thing was the court case and this
is the information I needed. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
leave. Ø
I look forward to hearing from
you and will pass the information over from the police compound as soon as I
have it. 1448,1449,1450,1451,1452,1453,1454,1455,1456,1457, 1458,1459,1460,1461,1462,1463, 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 437. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ MT3574694 Simon
Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1464,1465,1466,1467,1468,1469,1470, 1471,1472,1473,1474,1475,1476,1477,1478,1479,1480,1481,1482, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 02 February 2015 15:08 To: 'Wood, Peter' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø Thank you for the reply
to my email Ø Yes, the below would
cover everything I feel, Ø so, if you can go ahead
and do this, I would be most grateful. Ø As said, I just do not
want any way that the CSP and Court could have any confusion with anything. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 02 February 2015 14:56 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Lorraine, Ø
Thanks for your comments, don’t
worry I want to get this resolved as much as you and Simon, it’s taken far
too Ø
long already, so before I send
an amended Indemnity Letter (LOI) please confirm my understanding as listed
below – Ø I
will amend the registration of the Ford Zetec to show MA57LDY. Broadsure
originally gave us the incorrect registration and as you say it was a while
before this error was corrected and our policy history was confusing due to
the incorrect Clio that I was not aware of previously. Ø You
are correct, looking back on the instructions from Broadsure I cannot see
that they instructed Underwriters to delete the Renault Clio that was added
in error following receipt of advices from Broadsure. Ø I
can amend the comment in the letter to show that this vehicle was added to
the policy incorrectly following an effort on your part to correct the
registration number of the Ford Zetec and was a broker error, are you happy
with this? Ø The
letter states cover was for Social Domestic & Pleasure and Motor Trade
Use. Ø Motor
Trade use would cover Simon to carry a Motor Mechanics tools being used in
connection with Motor Trade but not any tools that would typically be used
for any other purposes such as perhaps,
paint/brushes/ladders/plumbing/Electrical (domestic/commercial except auto
electrical) and so on. Ø This
is standard cover; however, I am happy to expand on this statement in the
letter if you would like me to in order to clarify that point? Ø The
Police officer asked if Simon would be covered for the carriage of tools to
drive around doing “odd jobs”. Ø Later
in the call he again confirmed that Simon was not covered “to drive around
doing jobs”. Ø I
sent you the call so you can listen to it yourself but the tone of the
enquiry was suggesting that Simon was doing jobs not connected to the Motor
Trade however I do feel there is plenty of room here for misunderstanding. Ø If
the question had been more specific with the officer stating that Simon had
tools connected with the Motor Trade in the vehicle would he be covered –
Yes. Ø If
he said that the tools were not connected to the Motor Trade (as per my
comments above) then the answer is – No. Ø Not
something I can put into a Letter of Indemnity but certainly something to be
argued with the CPS/Courts. Ø I’m
happy to confirm in the letter that cover was in force under this policy on
the 14/11/2013. Ø Once
I hear back from you, I will revise the LOI accordingly and e‐mail it
across for you to sign off, I will also send an original in the post just in
case! 1465, If you need anything else
please do not hesitate to drop me and Andy a line, I am keeping Andy in the
loop as I will be on leave from 12/2/15 – 9/3/15 so he will need to deal with
anything in my absence. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of
Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 January 2015 01:47 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø
Thank you very much for the
information you have sent, I do see some errors in your letter of Indemnity.
Ø
This registration was always
put in not correctly but was in fact given to Broadsure Direct correctly. Ø
The registration should have
been Ford Zetec registration MA57LDY Ø
This was later correct after
the 3rd time of telling the Ford Zetec registration as MA57LDY Ø
please see attached document. Ø
This is the registration that
should have been on the policy from the start. Ø
We never knew it was not
correct until 08/04/13 when again the correct registration was given. Ø
However, it was put down as
Renault Clio registration NA57LDY, Ø
we then believe it was put in
correctly and not a new car added. Ø
We were not sent any documents
of that change so did not know there was again an error until the Oct 2013
when it was in fact corrected this time, we asked for new documents to be
sent which they were so we could check. Ø
But they kept on his policy
Renault Clio registration NA57LDY we made a next call and told them this
needed to be removed and was told it would be done. Ø
It seems this was never done by
what you have sent in your email. Ø
I do believe I have emails also
about this issue to Broadsure Direct and Martin Jenkins, can confirm this as
he was the one, we dealt with at Broadsure Direct. Ø
He also should remember all the
phone calls. Ø
There is also a next issue
Simon was not just covered with the basic trade insurance with KGM, Broadsure
Direct had a special section with KGM which included in his insurance he was
in fact covered for his work as a mechanic, not just standard insurance of
trade buying and selling that KGM as a rule only deals with. Ø
This has been discussed with
the underwriters at KGM by Broadsure Direct re Martin Jenkins. Ø
This also caused issues with
his insurance cover a few times. Ø
This was also meant to have
been address and seems it was not. Ø
At the time we were not happy
as we were told he was not covered when in fact he was. Ø
If you call Broadsure Direct
and speak to Martin Jenkins, I feel that he can send you the paperwork and
under writing of how Simon’s insurance was meant to have been setup. Ø
As you can see there was a
number of issues with his insurance with KGM that lead to problems. Ø
and even with the issues of 14/11/2013
when a call was made to Kelly Tiller, we asked did the police say what
tools was meant to have been in the van as if there were mechanic tools in
there his insurance should have in fact covered this. Ø
Kelly Tiller said no the police
officer did not say which tools. Ø
But also said he was again not
insured for this again Martin Jenkins got a rude call from us and again he
had to make calls to address this issue. Ø
Can you please confirm he was
correctly insured with KGM and write this as I would like this addressed? Ø
And one last thing could you
please say in your letter on the date of the 14/11/2013 he was fully
insured just so there cannot be any mistakes at court. Ø
Sorry, this is causing such an
issue and taking up your time but I really want to have something that is
fully correct, as I do not want any other issues with courts, police and
anything else that could cause my Son problems. 1466,1467,1468,1469,1470,1471,1472,1473,1474,1475, 1476,1477,1478,1479,1480,1481,1482, 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 438. Wood, Peter _Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell_
(2) / Page Numbers: 1483,1484,1485,1486,1487,1488,1489,1490,1491, 1492,1493,1494,1495,1496,1497,1498,1499,1500,1501, From: Wood, Peter [Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 02 February 2015 15:48 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Attachments: S Cordell 020215.pdf Dear Lorraine, Ø Please review the
attached revised LOI, Ø once you confirm you
are happy with it, Ø I will put an original
in the post today. Ø I think that's it for
now but just shout if you need anything else. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of
Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 02 February 2015 15:08 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø Thank you for the reply
to my email Ø Yes, the below would
cover everything I feel, Ø so, if you can go ahead
and do this, I would be most grateful. Ø As said, I just do not
want any way that the CSP and Court could have any confusion with anything. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 02 February 2015 14:56 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Ø
Thanks for your comments, don’t
worry I want to get this resolved as much as you and Simon, it’s taken far
too Ø
long already, so before I send
an amended Indemnity Letter (LOI) please confirm my understanding as listed
below – Ø I
will amend the registration of the Ford Zetec to show MA57LDY. Broadsure
originally gave us the incorrect registration and as you say it was a while
before this error was corrected and our policy history was confusing due to
the incorrect Clio that I was not aware of previously. Ø You
are correct, looking back on the instructions from Broadsure I cannot see
that they instructed Underwriters to delete the Renault Clio that was added
in error following receipt of advices from Broadsure. Ø I
can amend the comment in the letter to show that this vehicle was added to
the policy incorrectly following an effort on your part to correct the
registration number of the Ford Zetec and was a broker error, are you happy
with this? Ø The
letter states cover was for Social Domestic & Pleasure and Motor Trade
Use. Ø Motor
Trade use would cover Simon to carry a Motor Mechanics tools being used in
connection with Motor Trade but not any tools that would typically be used
for any other purposes such as perhaps,
paint/brushes/ladders/plumbing/Electrical (domestic/commercial except auto
electrical) and so on. Ø This
is standard cover; however, I am happy to expand on this statement in the
letter if you would like me to in order to clarify that point? Ø The
Police officer asked if Simon would be covered for the carriage of tools to
drive around doing “odd jobs”. Ø Later
in the call he again confirmed that Simon was not covered “to drive around
doing jobs”. Ø I
sent you the call so you can listen to it yourself but the tone of the
enquiry was suggesting that Simon was doing jobs not connected to the Motor
Trade however I do feel there is plenty of room here for misunderstanding. Ø If
the question had been more specific with the officer stating that Simon had
tools connected with the Motor Trade in the vehicle would he be covered –
Yes. Ø If
he said that the tools were not connected to the Motor Trade (as per my
comments above) then the answer is – No. Ø Not
something I can put into a Letter of Indemnity but certainly something to be
argued with the CPS/Courts. Ø I’m
happy to confirm in the letter that cover was in force under this policy on
the 14/11/2013. Ø Once
I hear back from you, I will revise the LOI accordingly and e‐mail it
across for you to sign off, I will also send an original in the post just in
case! 1465, If you need anything else
please do not hesitate to drop me and Andy a line, I am keeping Andy in the
loop as I will be on leave from 12/2/15 – 9/3/15 so he will need to deal with
anything in my absence. 1484,1485,1486,1487,1488,1489,1490,1491,1492,1493, 1494,1495,1496,1497,1498,1499,1500,1501, |
||||
|
54. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 54 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.03.2015_Re Simon Cordell 03/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 456 457,458,459,460,461,462 463,464,465 1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 439. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (29) Page Numbers: 1502,1503 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Wimbledon magistrates! |
03/02/2015 |
12:57:00 |
X10 456 457,458,459,460 461,462,463,464 465, |
|
|
55. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 55 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.03.2017_Re Subject Access
Request Simon Cordell 03/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 466,467,468 |
03/02/2015 |
14:16:00 |
X3 466,467,468 |
|
|
54. Additional Email
Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 54 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.03.2015_Re Simon Cordell 03/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 456 457,458,459,460,461,462 463,464,465 -- 456, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57 To: 'London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk' Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: Appeal-Case-Driving-Tools-26-11-2014.pdf S Cordell 020215.pdf. MT Underwriting_ FW_ MR SIMON
CORDELL - CX52 JRZ.pdf s Cordell call from police
141113.wma. 26_11_2013_13_53-Kelly-Tiller-Kelly
call to compound.wav Dear Debbie Barnett Ø
Thank you for taking
the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Ø
Could you please
also confirm by email that you have this email. Ø
As explained, there
have been a number of issues with my son Simon Cordell Ø
DOB: Ø
The issues are one
of not being insured. Ø
When in fact he was. Ø
There was a case
heard on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my son
Simon Cordell was found guilty of using his vehicle for business purposes. Ø
This was only the case
due to the police officer lying. Ø
Not just to KGM who
my son was insured with, but in his statement of facts, and also on oath to
the judge and CPS. Ø
The case is such
that on the day my son was stopped the police office made a call to KGM the
police office told KGM that my son Simon Cordell had lots of tools in his van
and was doing odd jobs. Ø
Under my son
insurance this would not have covered him, and the police officer would have
known this already as my son had given the police officer his policy at the
side of the road. Ø
My son was arrested
and taken to the police station. Ø
Due to him refusing
to sign the seizer notice and telling the police officer he was lying and to
arrest him. Ø
My sons Van
registration CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound,
with no tools in there. Ø
The police office
when wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call but with
something totally incorrect information. Ø
The judge asked the
police office at court about the tools as he saw emails from KGM the police
office told the judge he knew nothing about any tools. Ø
The police officer I
believed new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls was
already being put into the police about complaints. Ø
So changed his story
in his statement. Ø
The facts are that
there are audio tapes of what the police officer said to KGM, and also the
call that was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all calls. Ø
I have both of the
audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a
manager sent to Kelly Tiller at KGM. Ø
How can a police
officer act in such a manner? Ø
I really do not
understand why he did this. Ø
As also said on the
phone there is a number of summons my son has not had regarding the other
stops from police, these cases he has gone to court without him knowing and
he been found guilty when he did not even know there was a case in court. Ø
I have sent many
emails to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to the
court. Ø
2 case we had to do
statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for Bromley. Ø
The Willesden one
seems to have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us
knowing again he was found guilty but they put this case under a new case
number looking at the letter so all the documents that were sent before was
not with the court file I would have through. Ø
But with both
statutory declarations we added a copy of his insurance. Ø
I have been trying
for some time to get all of this put together so it can all be addresses and
so far, nothing has been done with all the emails I have sent to the court. Ø
We also asked at
court when we went to Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, but nothing was done. Ø
Could you please
tell us where we can sort this out about getting all the other cases
addressed without the need to be going from one court to the next. Ø
This is a waste of
courts time and money when clearly all that is needed to be is check my son's
insurance that he was in fact insured. 457, Ø I am sure that the letter
that has been sent of Indemnity from KGM would cover these other cases as
proof he was in fact insured. Ø Could you please
advise what needs to be done with these other cases? Ø Please can you
address the issues in this email and get back to me by email. Regards Lorraine Cordell 458,
End of Picture! 459,
End of Picture! 460,
End of Picture! 461,
End of Picture! 462, Re: Simon Cordell->MT
Under writing_ FW_ MR SIMON CORDELL 4CX52 JRZ.pdf From: MT Underwriting [MT.Underwriting@canopius.com] Sent: 04 December 2014 15:34 To: Gramlick, Les Subject: FW: MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Kelly Tiller Ø Member of the UK
Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London |
E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9116 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: GARETH.Mullett@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:GARETH.MuNett@met.pnn.police.uk] On Behalf Of VresCharlton@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 November 2013 14:10 To: Tiller, Kelly Subject: RE: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Kelly, Ø Kelly, I looked at the seizure notice nothing was
taken at the roadside Ø and nothing was registered as left in the vehicle. Regards Gareth From: Tiller, Kelly [ mailto: Kelly.Tiller@canopius.com Sent: 25 November 2013 16:28 To: VRES Mailbox - Charlton Subject: RE: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Ø I have been told by the
police that you do a report on all items that was in the vehicle at the time
it was ceased. Ø Can I have a copy of
this report please? Kind regards Kelly Tiller Fleet Underwriting | KGM Motor Insurance - Member of the Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1818 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Sarah.Williams6@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: Sarah.Williams6@met.pnn.police.uk On Behalf Of VresCharlton@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 25 November 2013 16:26 To: Tiller, Kelly Subject: RE: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Ø We have no record what
was in the vehicle, Ø we do not touch the
vehicles contents. Regards F S Williams file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 463, Page 2 of 4 From: Tiller, Kelly [mailto: Kelly.Tiller@eanopius.com Sent: 25 November 2013 10:55 To: VRES Mailbox - Charlton Subject: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Morning, Ø I need some assistance
with regards to the above. Ø We ensure Mr Simon Cordell
and I need a copy of the report of the items that was in his vehicle at the
time it was ceased. Ø We are due to cancel
his policy @ noon today. Ø Your urgent advises are
awaited. Kind regards Kelly Tiller Fleet Underwriting | KGM Motor Insurance - Member of the Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1818 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Syndicate
260 which is managed by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery
9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We
are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary. file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 464, Page 3 of 4 NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be
confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Syndicate
260 which is managed by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery
9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We
are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary. NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject
to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of
the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please
notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude
any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 465, Page 4 of 4 The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached
with other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/ metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpoliceuk file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 END 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 439. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (29) / Page Numbers: 1502,1503, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57 To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’ Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: AppealCaseDrivingTools26112014.pdf; S Cordell 020215.pdf; MT Underwriting _FW_ MR
SIMON CORDELL CX52 JRZ.pdf; s Cordell call from police
141113.wma; 26_11_2013_13_53__KellyTiller
Kelly call to compound.wav Dear Debbie Barnett Ø Thank you for taking
the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Ø Could you please also
confirm by email that you have this email. Ø As explained, there
have been a number of issues with my son Simon Cordell Ø DOB: Ø The issues are one of
not being insured. Ø When in fact he was. Ø There was a case heard
on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my son Simon
Cordell was found guilty of using his vehicle for business purposes. Ø This was only the case
due to the police officer lying. Ø Not just to KGM who my
son was insured with, but in his statement of facts, and also on oath to the
judge and CPS. Ø The case is such that
on the day my son was stopped the police office made a call to KGM the police
office told KGM that my son Simon Cordell had lots of tools in his van and
was doing odd jobs. Ø Under my son insurance
this would not have covered him, and the police officer would have known this
already as my son had given the police officer his policy at the side of the
road. Ø My son was arrested and
taken to the police station. Ø Due to him refusing to
sign the seizer notice and telling the police officer he was lying and to
arrest him. Ø My sons Van
registration CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound,
with no tools in there. Ø The police office when
wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call but with
something totally incorrect information. Ø The judge asked the
police office at court about the tools as he saw emails from KGM the police
office told the judge he knew nothing about any tools. Ø The police officer I
believed new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls was
already being put into the police about complaints. Ø So changed his story in
his statement. Ø The facts are that
there are audio tapes of what the police officer said to KGM, and also the
call that was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all calls. Ø I have both of the
audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a
manager sent to Kelly Tiller at KGM. Ø How can a police
officer act in such a manner? Ø I really do not
understand why he did this. Ø As also said on the
phone there is a number of summons my son has not had regarding the other
stops from police, these cases he has gone to court without him knowing and
he been found guilty when he did not even know there was a case in court. Ø I have sent many emails
to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to the court. Ø 2 case we had to do
statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for Bromley. Ø The Willesden one seems
to have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing
again he was found guilty but they put this case under a new case number
looking at the letter so all the documents that were sent before was not with
the court file I would have through. Ø But with both statutory
declarations we added a copy of his insurance. Ø I have been trying for
some time to get all of this put together so it can all be addresses and so
far, nothing has been done with all the emails I have sent to the court. Ø We also asked at court
when we went to Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, but nothing was done. Ø Could you please tell
us where we can sort this out about getting all 1503, Ø the other cases
addressed without the need to be going from one court to the next. Ø This is a waste of courts
time and money when clearly all that is needed to be is check my son's
insurance that he was in fact insured. Ø I am sure that the letter that has been sent of
Indemnity from KGM would cover these other cases as proof he was in fact
insured. Ø
Could
you please advise what needs to be done with these other cases? Ø
Please
can you address the issues in this email and get back to me by email. Regards Lorraine Cordell 55. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.03.2017_Re Subject Access
Request Simon Cordell 03/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 466,467,468 466, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent:03 February 2017
14:16 Subject: Re: Subject Access
Request Simon Cordell Attachments: Subject-access-request-Broadsure-Direct.pdf To Whom It May
Concern: Ø Please see attached document regarding a subject access request I
would like address while Broadsure Direct was dealing with my insurance. Ø If this email with attachment has been sent to the wrong department
that deals with data protection subject access requests could this, please be
passed to the correct department that deals with it? Ø If there is a fee payable or you need ID can someone let me know as
soon as possible via this email address. Ø Could you also let me know via this email address this email has been
received along with the attachment? Regards Simon Cordell 467, Re: Subject Access
Request Simon Cordell->Subject-access-request-Broadsure-Direct.pdf Mr Simon Cordell
109 Burncroft Ave Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ 03/02/2017 Broadsure Direct
4th Floor The Argyle Centre
York St Ramsgate Kent CT11 9DS Dear Sir or Madam Subject access
request Ø Mr Simon Cordell
109 Burncroft Ave Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ Ø Please supply the
information about me I am entitled to under the Data Protection Act 1998
relating to: Mr Simon Cordell Ø If this has been passed
to the incorrect department who deal with such requests, could this please be
passed to the correct department who deals with data protection subject
access requests please? Ø All data that
Broadsure Direct hold on any systems or files about me since I held insurance
with Broadsure Direct. Ø All audio call
files that Broadsure Direct hold this would include when the police have
called to check if I was insured. Ø All account
Information and amounts paid. Ø Reason as to why
any insurance policies were cancelled, or Voided 1 468, Ø Dates all policies
started and ended and which company had the policies in force. Ø If you are withholding
any information, I have asked for please make me aware of this and the reason
as to why the data is being denied. Ø If you need any
more information from me, such as ID or a fee is payable, please let me know
as soon as possible so this subject access request can be dealt with in a
speedy manner. This can be done via my email: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Ø It may be helpful
for you to know that a request for information under the Data Protection Act
1998 should be responded to within 40 days. Ø If you do not
normally deal with these requests, please pass this letter to your Data
Protection Officer. If you need advice on dealing with this request, the
Information Commissioner’s Office can assist you and can be contacted on 0303
123 1113 or at www.ico.org.uk/ Yours faithfully Mr Simon Cordell 2 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
04/02/2015 |
|
|
|
56. Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 56 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.05.2015_FW Re Simon
Cordell 05/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 469,470,471,472,473,474 475,476,477,478 1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 440. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ Re_ Simon Cordell_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1504,1505 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Wimbledon magistrates! 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 441. Lorraine Cordell
_Fwd._ Re_ Simon Cordell_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1506,1507 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Wimbledon magistrates! |
05/02/2015 |
16:53:00 |
X10 469,470,471,472 473,474,475,476 477,478, |
|
|
57. Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 57 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.05.2015_FW Re Simon
Cordell_001 05/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 479,480 481,482,483,484,485,486 487,488 |
05/02/2015 |
15:13:00 |
X10 479,480 481,482,483,484, 485,486,487,488 |
|
|
56. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.05.2015_FW Re Simon
Cordell 05/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 469,470,471,472,473,474 475,476,477,478 469, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 05 February 2015 16:53 To: listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk Cc: London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: FW: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: Appeal-Case-Driving-Tools-26-11-2014.pdf S Cordell 020215.pdf MT-Under writing_ FW_ MR-SIMON
CORDELL - CX52 JRZ.pdf S Cordell call from
police-141113.wma 26_11_2013_13_53-Kelly-Tiller-Kelly
call to compound.wav To Whom It May
Concern: Ø I am writing this email due
today due to speaking to the CPS again about the case that was
heard at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court on the 26/11/2014 Ø where my son was found guilty. Ø My son's details are Mr Simon
Paul Cordell Ø DOB: Ø An appeal was put in on the
same date 26/11/2014 and we have been waiting for an appeal date. Ø But today when speaking to the CSP
they told us a date was already set for the 05/03/2015 at
Kingston-upon-Thames Crown Court, we have had no letters of a date being set
could you please forward to this email any letters that have been sent. Ø At court when my son was found
guilty the cps and the judge advised if we got the information needed from
his insurance then it could be sent before we got a date for the appeal to
the cps and court. Ø which I spoke to Debbie Barnett
from the CPS on the 02/02/2015 and told her I was now able to send this
data over. Ø She asked me to send this via
email which was done on the 03/02/2015, please see below email. Ø Could you please link this
email and all attachments to the court file? Ø I do not know the case ref for
the court due to not having any letters. Ø There are 3 PDF files and 2
Audio files from his insurance company. Ø Could you also please explain
what format the audio files should be in to be used in this case, also should
they be on CD of tape. and would we need to bring something to court to play
them on. Ø The insurance company need to
know this ASAP seeing as the case is listed for the 05/03/2015. Ø Could you also please tell us
what time the case is listed for, and also reply to this email to let me know
you have got it safely with the attached documents and audio files. Regards Lorraine Cordell Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57 To: 'London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk' Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett Ø Thank you for taking
the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Ø Could you please also
confirm by email that you have this email. Ø As explained, there
have been a number of issues with my son Simon Cordell Ø DOB: Ø The issues are one of
not being insured. Ø When in fact he was. There was a case heard on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates'
Court where my son Simon Cordell was found guilty of using his 470, Ø vehicle for business
purposes. Ø This was only the case
due to the police officer lying. Ø Not just to KGM who my
son was insured with, but in his statement of facts, and also on oath to the
judge and CPS. Ø The case is such that
on the day my son was stopped the police office made a call to KGM the police
office told KGM that my son Simon Cordell had lots of tools in his van and
was doing odd jobs. Ø Under my son insurance
this would not have covered him, and the police officer would have known this
already as my son had given the police officer his policy at the side of the
road. Ø My son was arrested and
taken to the police station. Ø Due to him refusing to
sign the seizer notice and telling the police officer he was lying and to
arrest him. Ø My sons Van
registration CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound,
with no tools in there. Ø The police office when
wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call but with
something totally incorrect information. Ø The judge asked the
police office at court about the tools as he saw emails from KGM the police
office told the judge he knew nothing about any tools. Ø The police officer I
believed new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls was
already being put into the police about complaints. Ø So changed his story in
his statement. Ø The facts are that
there are audio tapes of what the police officer said to KGM, and also the
call that was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all calls. Ø I have both of the
audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a
manager sent to Kelly Tiller at KGM. Ø How can a police officer
act in such a manner? Ø I really do not
understand why he did this. Ø As also said on the
phone there is a number of summons my son has not had regarding the other
stops from police, these cases he has gone to court without him knowing and
he been found guilty when he did not even know there was a case in court. Ø I have sent many emails
to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to the court. Ø 2 case we had to do
statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for Bromley. Ø The Willesden one seems
to have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing
again he was found guilty but they put this case under a new case number
looking at the letter so all the documents that were sent before was not with
the court file I would have through. Ø But with both statutory
declarations we added a copy of his insurance. Ø I have been trying for
some time to get all of this put together so it can all be addresses and so
far, nothing has been done with all the emails I have sent to the court. Ø We also asked at court
when we went to Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, but nothing was done. Ø Could you please tell
us where we can sort this out about getting all the other cases addressed
without the need to be going from one court to the next. Ø This is a waste of
courts time and money when clearly all that is needed to be is check my son's
insurance that he was in fact insured. Ø I am sure that the letter that has been sent of
Indemnity from KGM would cover these other cases as proof he was in fact
insured. Ø
Could
you please advise what needs to be done with these other cases? Ø
Please
can you address the issues in this email and get back to me by email. Regards Lorraine Cordell 471,
End of Picture! 472,
End of Picture! 473,
End of Picture! 474,
End of Picture! 475, FW: Re: Simon Cordell->MT Underwriting_ MR SMION CORDELL-4CX52 JRZ.pdf From: MT Underwriting [MT.Underwriting@canopius.com] Sent: 04 December 2014 15:34 To: Gramlick, Les Subject: FW: MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Kelly Tiller Ø Member of the UK
Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London |
E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9116 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: GARETH.Mullett@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: GARETH.MuNett@met.pnn.police.uk On Behalf Of VresCharlton@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 November 2013 14:10 To: Tiller, Kelly Subject: RE: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Kelly, Ø Kelly, I looked at the seizure notice nothing was
taken at the roadside Ø and nothing was registered as left in the vehicle. Gareth From: Tiller, Kelly mailto: Kelly.Tiller@canopius.com Sent: 25 November 2013 16:28 To: VRES Mailbox - Charlton Subject: RE: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Ø I have been told by the
police that you do a report on all items that was in the vehicle at the time
it was ceased. Ø Can I have a copy of
this report please? Kind regards Kelly Tiller Fleet Underwriting | KGM Motor Insurance - Member of the Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1818 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Sarah.Williams6@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: Sarah.Williams6@met.pnn.police.uk On Behalf Of VresCharlton@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 25 November 2013 16:26 To: Tiller, Kelly Subject: RE: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Ø We have no record what
was in the vehicle, Ø we do not touch the
vehicles contents. Regards F S Williams file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 476, Page 2 of 4 From: Tiller, Kelly mailto: Kelly.Tiller@eanopius.com Sent: 25 November 2013 10:55 To: VRES Mailbox - Charlton Subject: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Morning, Ø I need some assistance
with regards to the above. Ø We ensure Mr Simon
Cordell and I need a copy of the report of the items that was in his vehicle
at the time it was ceased. Ø We are due to cancel
his policy @ noon today. Ø Your urgent advises are
awaited. Kind regards Kelly Tiller Fleet Underwriting | KGM Motor Insurance - Member of the Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1818
| F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number
02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Syndicate 260 which is managed by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in
England and Wales Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on
the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and
support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make our capital
safer. Consider our environment - please do not print
this email unless absolutely necessary. file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 477, Page 3 of 4 NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to
copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify
the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to
conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts
no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Syndicate
260 which is managed by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery
9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We
are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary. NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject
to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of
the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please
notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to
conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 478, Page 4 of 4 The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached
with other employees or agents. The security of this email and any
attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but
malicious software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 END 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 440. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ Re_ Simon Cordell_
(3) / Page Numbers: 1504,1505, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 05 February 2015 15:13 To: 'listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk' Cc: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk Subject: FW: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: AppealCaseDrivingTools26112014.pdf; S Cordell 020215.pdf; MT Under writing _FW_ MR
SIMON CORDELL CX52 JRZ.pdf s Cordell call from police
141113.wma; 26_11_2013_13_53__KellyTiller
Kelly call to compound.wav To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am writing
this email due today due to speaking to the CPS again about the
case that was heard at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court on the 26/11/2014 Ø
where my son
was found guilty. Ø
My son's
details are Mr Simon Paul Cordell Ø DOB: Ø
An appeal was
put in on the same date 26/11/2014 and we have been waiting for an
appeal date. Ø
But today when
speaking to the CSP they told us a date was already set for the 05/03/2015
at Kingston-upon-Thames Crown Court, we have had no letters of a date
being set could you please forward to this email any letters that have been
sent. Ø
At court when
my son was found guilty the cps and the judge advised if we got the
information needed from his insurance then it could be sent before we got a
date for the appeal to the cps and court. Ø
which I spoke
to Debbie Barnett from the CPS on the 02/02/2015 and told her I was
now able to send this data over. Ø
She asked me to
send this via email which was done on the 03/02/2015, please see below
email. Ø
Could you
please link this email and all attachments to the court file? Ø
I do not know
the case ref for the court due to not having any letters. Ø
There are 3 PDF
files and 2 Audio files from his insurance company. Ø
Could you also
please explain what format the audio files should be in to be used in this
case, also should they be on CD of tape. and would we need to bring something
to court to play them on. Ø
The insurance
company need to know this ASAP seeing as the case is listed for the
05/03/2015. Ø
Could you also
please tell us what time the case is listed for, and also reply to this email
to let me know you have got it safely with the attached documents and audio
files. Regards Lorraine Cordell Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57 To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’ Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett Ø Thank you for taking
the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Ø Could you please also
confirm by email that you have this email. Ø As explained, there
have been a number of issues with my son Simon Cordell Ø DOB: Ø The issues are one of
not being insured. Ø When in fact he was. 1505, Ø There was a case heard
on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my son Simon
Cordell was found guilty of using his Ø vehicle for business
purposes. Ø This was only the case due
to the police officer lying. Ø Not just to KGM who my
son was insured with, but in his statement of facts, and also on oath to the
judge and CPS. Ø The case is such that
on the day my son was stopped the police office made a call to KGM the police
office told KGM that my son Simon Cordell had lots of tools in his van and
was doing odd jobs. Ø Under my son insurance
this would not have covered him, and the police officer would have known this
already as my son had given the police officer his policy at the side of the
road. Ø My son was arrested and
taken to the police station. Ø Due to him refusing to
sign the seizer notice and telling the police officer he was lying and to
arrest him. Ø My sons Van
registration CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound,
with no tools in there. Ø The police office when
wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call but with
something totally incorrect information. Ø The judge asked the
police office at court about the tools as he saw emails from KGM the police
office told the judge he knew nothing about any tools. Ø The police officer I
believed new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls was
already being put into the police about complaints. Ø So changed his story in
his statement. Ø The facts are that
there are audio tapes of what the police officer said to KGM, and also the
call that was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all calls. Ø I have both of the
audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a
manager sent to Kelly Tiller at KGM. Ø How can a police
officer act in such a manner? Ø I really do not
understand why he did this. Ø As also said on the
phone there is a number of summons my son has not had regarding the other
stops from police, these cases he has gone to court without him knowing and
he been found guilty when he did not even know there was a case in court. Ø I have sent many emails
to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to the court. Ø 2 case we had to do
statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for Bromley. Ø The Willesden one seems
to have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing
again he was found guilty but they put this case under a new case number
looking at the letter so all the documents that were sent before was not with
the court file I would have through. Ø But with both statutory
declarations we added a copy of his insurance. Ø I have been trying for
some time to get all of this put together so it can all be addresses and so
far, nothing has been done with all the emails I have sent to the court. Ø We also asked at court
when we went to Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, but nothing was done. Ø Could you please tell
us where we can sort this out about getting all the other cases addressed
without the need to be going from one court to the next. Ø This is a waste of
courts time and money when clearly all that is needed to be is check my son's
insurance that he was in fact insured. Ø I am sure that the letter that has been sent of
Indemnity from KGM would cover these other cases as proof he was in fact
insured. Ø
Could
you please advise what needs to be done with these other cases? Ø
Please
can you address the issues in this email and get back to me by email. Regards Lorraine Cordell 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 441. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ Re_ Simon Cordell_
(2) / Page Numbers: 1506,1507, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 05 February 2015 16:53 To: 'listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk' Cc: London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk Subject: FW: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: AppealCaseDrivingTools26112014.pdf; S Cordell 020215.pdf; MT Under writing FW_MR
SIMON CORDELL CX52 JRZ.pdf; s Cordell call from
police 141113.wma; 26_11_2013_13_53__KellyTiller
Kelly call to compound.wav To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am writing this
email due today due to speaking to the CPS again about the case
that was heard at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court on the 26/11/2014 Ø
where my son
was found guilty. Ø
My son's
details are Mr Simon Paul Cordell Ø DOB: Ø
An appeal was put
in on the same date 26/11/2014 and we have been waiting for an appeal
date. Ø
But today when
speaking to the CSP they told us a date was already set for the 05/03/2015
at Kingston-upon-Thames Crown Court, we have had no letters of a date
being set could you please forward to this email any letters that have been
sent. Ø
At court when
my son was found guilty the cps and the judge advised if we got the
information needed from his insurance then it could be sent before we got a
date for the appeal to the cps and court. Ø
which I spoke
to Debbie Barnett from the CPS on the 02/02/2015 and told her I was
now able to send this data over. Ø
She asked me to
send this via email which was done on the 03/02/2015, please see below
email. Ø
Could you
please link this email and all attachments to the court file? Ø
I do not know
the case ref for the court due to not having any letters. Ø
There are 3 PDF
files and 2 Audio files from his insurance company. Ø
Could you also
please explain what format the audio files should be in to be used in this
case, also should they be on CD of tape. and would we need to bring something
to court to play them on. Ø
The insurance
company need to know this ASAP seeing as the case is listed for the
05/03/2015. Ø
Could you also
please tell us what time the case is listed for, and also reply to this email
to let me know you have got it safely with the attached documents and audio
files. Regards Lorraine Cordell Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57 To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’ Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Ø Thank you for taking
the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Ø Could you please also confirm
by email that you have this email. Ø As explained, there
have been a number of issues with my son Simon Cordell Ø DOB: Ø The issues are one of
not being insured. Ø When in fact he was. 1507, “The Same as Above” 57. Additional Email
Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 57 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.05.2015_FW Re Simon
Cordell_001 05/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 479,480 481,482,483,484,485,486 487,488 -- 479, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 05 February 2015 15:13 To: listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk Cc: London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: FW: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: Appeal-Case-Driving-Tools-26-11-2014.pdf. S Cordell 020215.pdf. MT Underwriting_ MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ.pdf s Cordell call from police 141113.wma. 26_11_2013_13_53 Kelly Tiller Kelly call to compound.wav To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am writing
this email due today due to speaking to the CPS again about the
case that was heard at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court on the 26/11/2014 Ø
where my son
was found guilty. Ø
My son's
details are Mr Simon Paul Cordell Ø DOB: Ø
An appeal was
put in on the same date 26/11/2014 and we have been waiting for an
appeal date. Ø
But today when
speaking to the CSP they told us a date was already set for the 05/03/2015
at Kingston-upon-Thames Crown Court, we have had no letters of a date
being set could you please forward to this email any letters that have been
sent. Ø
At court when
my son was found guilty the cps and the judge advised if we got the
information needed from his insurance then it could be sent before we got a
date for the appeal to the cps and court. Ø
which I spoke
to Debbie Barnett from the CPS on the 02/02/2015 and told her I was
now able to send this data over. Ø
She asked me to
send this via email which was done on the 03/02/2015, please see below
email. Ø
Could you
please link this email and all attachments to the court file? Ø
I do not know
the case ref for the court due to not having any letters. Ø
There are 3 PDF
files and 2 Audio files from his insurance company. Ø
Could you also
please explain what format the audio files should be in to be used in this
case, also should they be on CD of tape. and would we need to bring something
to court to play them on. Ø
The insurance
company need to know this ASAP seeing as the case is listed for the
05/03/2015. Ø
Could you also
please tell us what time the case is listed for, and also reply to this email
to let me know you have got it safely with the attached documents and audio
files. Regards Lorraine Cordell Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57 To: London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk Cc: swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett Ø Thank you for taking
the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Ø Could you please also
confirm by email that you have this email. Ø As explained, there
have been a number of issues with my son Simon Cordell Ø DOB: Ø The issues are one of
not being insured. Ø When in fact he was. 480,481,482,483,484,485,486,487,488, |
||||
|
58. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: Listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk_02.06.2015_RE Re Simon
Cordell 06/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 489,490,491,492 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Read acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1508 Asbo! Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brixton
Case / Met Police! 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Read acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1509 Asbo! Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brixton
Case / Met Police! 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Read acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1510 Asbo! Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brixton
Case / Met Police! 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 RE FW Re Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1511 Tyrone: Asbo Simon: Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brixton
Case / Met Police! 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Read acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1512 6 he Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 RE FW Re Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1513,1514 Tyrone: Asbo Simon: Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brixton
Case / Met Police! 7 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 RE FW Re Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1515,1516 Tyrone: Asbo Simon: Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brixton
Case / Met Police! 8 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Read acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1517 Tyrone: Asbo Simon: Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brixton
Case / Met Police! 9 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 FW Simon Cordell FW Re
Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1518,1519 Tyrone: Asbo Simon: Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brixton
Case / Met Police! 10 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Read acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1520 Asbo! 11 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Read acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1521 Asbo! 12 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 02 Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1522 Asbo! 13 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 442. Wood, Peter _Re_
MT3574694 Simon Cordell_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1523,1524,1525,1526,1527,1528, 1529,1530,1531,1532,1533, 1534,1535,1536,1537,1538,1539,1540,1541,1542,1543 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 14 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 443. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1544,1545,1546,1547,1548,1549, 1550,1551,1552,1553,1554, 1555,1556,1557,1558,1559,1560,1561,1562,1563,1564 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 15 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 444. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (28) / Page Numbers: 1565 Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brixton
Case / Met Police! 16 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 445. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1566 Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brixton
Case / Met Police! 17 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 446. Lorraine Cordell
_Fwd._ Re_ Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1567 Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brixton
Case / Met Police! 18 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 447. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1568,1569 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 19 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 448. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1570,1571,1572 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 20 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 449. Kingston Crown,
Listing _RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1573,1574,1575 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 21 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 450. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1576,1577 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
06/02/2015 |
16:59:00 |
X4 489,490,491,492 |
|
|
59. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.06.2015_RE Re Simon
Cordell_001 06/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 493,494,495,496,497,498 499,500,501,502 |
06/02/2015 |
16:27:00 |
X10 493,494,495,496, 497,498,499,500,501, 502 |
|
|
60. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.06.2015_Re Simon Cordell 06/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 503,504 505,506,507,508,509 |
06/02/2015 |
15:24:00 |
X7 503,504,505,506, 507,508,509 |
|
|
58. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: Listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk_02.06.2015_RE Re Simon
Cordell 06/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 489,490,491,492 -- 489, From: Kingston Crown, Listing <Listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk> Sent: 06 February 2015 16:59 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: DOC008.PDF Dear Lorraine Ø
Please find enclosed
letter that would have been sent via recorded delivery on 02.02.15. Regards Karen Mitchecc Listing Team Kingston upon Thames Crown
Court (T) 020 8240 2500 (Gold fax) 0870 324 0157 listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk "I am not authorised to
bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or
other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via
electronic means". From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 16:27 To:
Kingston Crown, Listing Cc: London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk; GL-SWESTERNMCENQ Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett CPS: and
Sheila from the Listing Office at the crown court. Ø
It does seem I am
having trouble with sending the audio files could you please tell me how I
can send them I have put the other files in but not the audio which will need
to be put with his case files. Ø
Please read below
emails. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 15:41 To: London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk Cc: listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett CPS: and
Sheila from the Listing Office at the crown court. Ø
I did send the below
email with all attachments, Ø
but I don't think
anyone got it due to its size. Ø
I am resending it in
3 parts. Part 1 of 3 email 490, Ø
Please see Attached
files and please read below email. Ø
could you please
also let me know you have got this email. Ø
I did also call
yesterday and was told you was not in the office and spoke to someone who
told me an appeal date has been set for the 05/03/2015 the crown
court. Ø
I have also spoke to
Sheila today at the Crown court listing office where I told her that we had
not had any letters from the crown court she also told me that they did not
get any emails I sent over. Ø
I do not have the case
number and asked her if she could send the letter that was sent out by email
to this email address. Ø
Could all attached
documents be attached to the case files please? Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57 To: London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk Cc: swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett Ø Thank you for taking
the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Ø Could you please also
confirm by email that you have this email. Ø As explained, there have
been a number of issues with my son Simon Cordell Ø DOB: Ø The issues are one of
not being insured. Ø When in fact he was. Ø There was a case heard
on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my son Simon
Cordell was found guilty of using his Ø vehicle for business
purposes. Ø This was only the case
due to the police officer lying. Ø Not just to KGM who my
son was insured with, but in his statement of facts, and also on oath to the
judge and CPS. Ø The case is such that
on the day my son was stopped the police office made a call to KGM the police
office told KGM that my son Simon Cordell had lots of tools in his van and
was doing odd jobs. Ø Under my son insurance
this would not have covered him, and the police officer would have known this
already as my son had given the police officer his policy at the side of the
road. Ø My son was arrested and
taken to the police station. Ø Due to him refusing to
sign the seizer notice and telling the police officer he was lying and to
arrest him. Ø My sons Van
registration CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound,
with no tools in there. Ø The police office when
wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call but with
something totally incorrect information. Ø The judge asked the
police office at court about the tools as he saw emails from KGM the police
office told the judge he knew nothing about any tools. Ø The police officer I
believed new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls was
already being put into the police about complaints. Ø So changed his story in
his statement. Ø The facts are that
there are audio tapes of what the police officer said to KGM, and also the
call that was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all calls. Ø I have both of the
audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a
manager sent to Kelly Tiller at KGM. Ø How can a police
officer act in such a manner? Ø I really do not
understand why he did this. Ø As also said on the
phone there is a number of summons my son has not had regarding the other
stops from police, these cases he has gone to court without him knowing and
he been found guilty when he did not even know there was a case in court. 491 Ø I have sent many emails
to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to the court. Ø 2 case we had to do
statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for Bromley. Ø The Willesden one seems
to have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing
again he was found guilty but they put this case under a new case number
looking at the letter so all the documents that were sent before was not with
the court file I would have through. Ø But with both statutory
declarations we added a copy of his insurance. Ø I have been trying for
some time to get all of this put together so it can all be addresses and so
far, nothing has been done with all the emails I have sent to the court. Ø We also asked at court
when we went to Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, but nothing was done. Ø Could you please tell
us where we can sort this out about getting all the other cases addressed
without the need to be going from one court to the next. Ø This is a waste of
courts time and money when clearly all that is needed to be is check my son's
insurance that he was in fact insured. Ø I am sure that the letter that has been sent of
Indemnity from KGM would cover these other cases as proof he was in fact
insured. Ø
Could
you please advise what needs to be done with these other cases? Ø
Please
can you address the issues in this email and get back to me by email. Regards Lorraine Cordell This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet
anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your
organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership
with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 492, RE: Re: Simon
Cordell->DOC008.PDF In the Crown Court at
Kingston Upon Thames KX 0661 4713 9GB Case No: A20140377 Court Code: 427 Ø Simon P Cordell 109
Burncroft Avenue ENFIELD Middlesex EN3 7JQ Notice of Hearing
of Appeal Ø The appeal of Simon
Paul Cordell against conviction and sentence by Wimbledon Magistrates' Court
on the 29 August 2014 Ø will be heard at
the Crown Court at 6-8 Penrhyn Road, Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey, KT1 2BB on
the 5 March 2015 at 10:00 AM 04/03/15
NON-ATTENDANCE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF APPEAL Ø Important
information: Ø If you are not legally
represented, you are advised to telephone the court (020 8240 2500) during
the afternoon before the hearing of the appeal for confirmation of the time
your case will be heard. Ø If your appeal is
likely to last LONGER THAN 1 HOUR, please tell us IMMEDIATELY. Ø To abandon your
appeal: Ø If you are
appealing against a decision of a magistrates' court or licensing justices'
you must give a written notice of your wish to abandon the appeal to the
Clerk to Justices'; a copy of the notice to the Crown Court; a copy to every
other party to the appeal. Ø If you are appealing
against any other decision you must give a written notice to the Crown Court
and a copy to every other party to the appeal. Ø Notice must be
given at least 3 clear days (not counting Saturdays, Sundays, and Bank
Holidays) before the date of the hearing. Ø If you do not, or
if you do not appear at the hearing, you may have to pay costs. Ø If you are not
successful in your appeal to the Crown Court, you may be ordered to pay the
costs of the Respondent or at least a part of them. Ø If you are
successful you may be awarded costs. Copy to: Appellant
Respondent Clerk to the Justices END 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1508, From: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com To: Lorraine Cordell on behalf of Micheal McKee Subject: Read acknowledgement Date: 06 February 2015 12:57:16 Ø
This
is a delivery receipt for the mail that you sent on 06 February 2015 To "Micheal
McKee" <m.mcke@michaelcarrollandco.com> with subject
"FW: Simon Asbo". Note: This delivery receipt only
acknowledges that the message was displayed on the recipient’s computer.
There is no guarantee that the recipient has read or understood the message
contents. 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1509, From: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com on behalf of
Micheal McKee To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Read acknowledgement Date: 06 February 2015 14:24:32 Ø This is a delivery receipt for the mail that
you sent on 06 February 2015 to
“Micheal McKee" <m.mcke@michaelcarrollandco.com> with subject
"Re: Simon Cordell
Record". Note: This delivery receipt only acknowledges that the message was displayed
on the recipient’s computer. There is no guarantee that the recipient has
read or understood the message contents. 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1510, From: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com on behalf of Micheal
McKee To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Read
acknowledgement Date: 06 March 2015 14:40:46 Ø This is a delivery receipt for the mail that
you sent on 06 March 2015 to
"Micheal McKee" <m.mcke@michaelcarrollandco.com> with subject "FW: RE FOI 11845
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]". Note: This delivery receipt only acknowledges that the message was displayed
on the recipient’s computer. There is no guarantee that the recipient has
read or understood the message contents. 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 RE FW Re Simon
Cordell / Page Numbers: 1511, From: Micheal McKee To: iosephinewardsolicitor@amail.com Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: FW: Re: Simon Cordell Date: 06 February 2015 15:42:40 Attachments: LETTER OF AUTHORITYTB.docx Lorraine, Ø Please find the attached letter of authority
for Tyrone Benjamin's medical records. Ø Please can you get this signed and send it
back to us asap. Kind regards, Micheal McKee On 06 February 2015 at 15:28 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Ø Part 3 of 3 Audio file from KGM of when Simon
went to police compound to prove in fact there was not tools in his van so
his insurance would not be stopped. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 15:26 To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com' Cc: 'm.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com' Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Ø part 2 of 3 email Audio file of police talking
to KGM on the day Simon was pulled on the 14/11/2013 when the police
lied to get Simon insurance voided. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 15:24 To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com' Cc: 'm.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Ø Part 1 of 3 email. Ø please see attached the way in which Simon has
been treated by police and the lies one police office said to his insurance
KGM this is due to be at Kingston upon Thames crown court on the 05/03/2013
and this is the information KGM has sent. Ø I do have all the emails from KGM that has
gone back and forward since Simon was pulled by police on the 14/11/2013
I have to send this in a few emails due to the size not sure if you are
getting them Regards Lorraine 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1512, From: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com on behalf of Micheal
McKee To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Read
acknowledgement Date: 06 February 2015 15:43:15 Ø
This
is a delivery receipt for the mail that you sent on 06 February 2015 to "Micheal McKee" <m.mcke@michaelcarrollandco.com> with subject "FW: Re: Simon Cordell". Note: This delivery receipt only
acknowledges that the message was displayed on the recipient’s computer.
There is no guarantee that the recipient has read or understood the message
contents. 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 RE FW Re Simon
Cordell / Page Numbers: 1513,1514, From: Micheal McKee To: iosephinewardsolicitor@amail.com Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: FW: Re: Simon Cordell Date: 06 February 2015 15:43:51 Ø Can you please also let us know the details of
who his GP is. Thanks. On 06 February 2015 at
15:42 Micheal McKee <m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com> wrote:
Lorraine, Ø
Please find the attached letter
of authority for Tyrone Benjamin's medical records. Ø
Please can you get this signed
and send it back to us asap. Kind regards, Micheal McKee On 06 February 2015 at
15:28 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Ø
Part 3 of 3 Audio file from KGM
of when Simon went to police compound to prove in fact there was not tools in
his van so his insurance would not be stopped. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015
15:26 To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com' Cc: 'm.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com' Subject: RE:
Re: Simon Cordell Ø
part 2 of 3 email Audio file of
police talking to KGM on the day Simon was pulled on the 14/11/2013
when the police lied to get Simon insurance voided. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015
15:24 To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com' Cc: 'm.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Ø
Part 1 of 3 email. Ø
please see attached the way in
which Simon has been treated by police and the lies one police office said to
his insurance KGM this is due to be at Kingston upon Thames crown court on
the 05/03/2013 and this is the information KGM has sent. Ø
I do have all the emails from
KGM that has gone back and forward since Simon was pulled by police on the 14/11/2013
I have to send this in a few emails due to the size not sure if you are
getting them 1514, 7 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 RE FW Re Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1515,1516, From: Micheal McKee To: iosephinewardsolicitor@amail.com Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: FW: Re: Simon Cordell Date: 06 February 2015 16:20:00 Attachments: LETTER OF AUTHORITYTB.docx Ø Please see attached signed document Ø Tyrone is under: -- Ø The Royal London Hospital Ø Whitechapel Road Ø Whitechapel Ø London Ø E1 1BB Ø his GP is Ø Nightingale House Surgery 1 - 3 Nightingale
Road Edmonton N9 8AJ Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Micheal McKee [Mail To: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 06 February 2015
15:43 To: josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com; Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re:
FW: Re: Simon Cordell Lorraine, Ø
Please find the attached letter
of authority for Tyrone Benjamin's medical records. Ø
Please can you get this signed
and send it back to us asap. Kind regards, Micheal McKee On 06 February 2015 at
15:28 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Ø
Part 3 of 3 Audio file from KGM
of when Simon went to police compound to prove in fact there was not tools in
his van so his insurance would not be stopped. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015
15:26 To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com' Cc: 'm.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com' Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell 1516, “Forward Info” 8 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1517 From: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com on behalf of To: Micheal McKee Subject: Lorraine Cordell Read acknowledgement Date: 06 February 2015 16:47:53 Ø This is a delivery receipt for the mail that
you sent on 06 February 2015 to
"Micheal McKee" <m.mcke@michaelcarrollandco.com> with subject
"RE: Re: Simon Cordell".
Note: This delivery receipt only acknowledges that the message was displayed
on the recipient’s computer. There is no guarantee that the recipient has
read or understood the message contents. 9 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 FW Simon Cordell FW
Re Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1518,1519, Status: Active Date of Incorporation: 11/11/2013 Country of Origin: United Kingdom Company Type: Private Limited
Company Nature of Business (SIC): None Supplied Accounting Reference Date: 30/11 Last Accounts Made Up To: (NO ACCOUNTS FILED) Next Accounts Due: 11/08/2015 Last Return Made Up To: Next Return Due: 09/12/2014
OVERDUE From: Micheal McKee [Mail To: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 06 February 2015
15:44 To: josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com; Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re:
FW: Re: Simon Cordell Ø
Can you please also let us know
the details of who his GP is. Thanks. On 06 February 2015 at
15:42 Micheal McKee <m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com> wrote:
Lorraine, Ø
Please find the attached letter
of authority for Tyrone Benjamin's medical records. Ø
Please can you get this signed
and send it back to us asap. From: Lorraine Cordell To: "Micheal McKee" Cc: "ioseDhinewardsolicitor@amail.com1 Subject: RE: FW: Re: Simon Cordell Date: 06
February 2015 17:12:00 1519, Kind regards, Micheal McKee On 06 February 2015 at 15:28 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Ø
Part 3 of 3 Audio file from KGM
of when Simon went to police compound to prove in fact there was not tools in
his van so his insurance would not be stopped. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015
15:26 To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com' Cc: 'm.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com' Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Ø
part 2 of 3 email Audio file of
police talking to KGM on the day Simon was pulled on the 14/11/2013
when the police lied to get Simon insurance voided. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015
15:24 To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com' Cc: 'm.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Ø
Part 1 of 3 email. Ø
please see attached the way in
which Simon has been treated by police and the lies one police office said to
his insurance KGM this is due to be at Kingston upon Thames crown court on
the 05/03/2013 and this is the information KGM has sent. I do have all the emails
from KGM that has gone back and forward since Simon was pulled by police on
the 14/11/2013 I have to send this in a few emails due to the size not
sure if you are getting them Regards Lorraine 10 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1520 From: Lorraine Cordell To: "Micheal McKee” Cc: josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com Subject: FW: Simon Cordell Date: 06 February 2015 17:25:00 Dear Micheal Ø Please see below email from Every Decibel
Matters that confirms Simon Cordell has never had anything to do with this
company. Regards Lorraine From: moses.howe@gmail.com [Mail To: moses.howe@gmail.com] On Behalf of Moses Howe Sent: 06 February 2015 17:23 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Simon Cordell Ø I believe there has been some mistake as to
the ownership of Every Decibel Matters, it is owned by myself Moses Howe and
Sean O'Connor, not Simon Cordell. Ø He has nothing to do with Every Decibel
Matters LTD company number 0 and has not organised any events with us. Moses Howe Sound Engineer/Speaker Designer EveryDecibelMatters.co.uk 11 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01 Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1521 From: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com on behalf of Micheal
McKee To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Read
acknowledgement Date: 06 February 2015 17:39:24 This is a delivery receipt for the mail that you sent on 06 February 2015 to "Micheal McKee" <m.mcke@michaelcarrollandco.com> with subject "RE: FW: Re: Simon Cordell". Note: This delivery receipt only acknowledges that the message was displayed
on the recipient’s computer. There is no guarantee that the recipient has
read or understood the message contents. 12 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 02 Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1522 From: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com on behalf of Micheal
McKee To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Read
acknowledgement Date: 06 February 2015 17:34:10 Ø This is a delivery receipt for the mail that
you sent on 06 February 2015 to
"Micheal McKee" <m.mcke@michaelcarrollandco.com> with subject "FW: Simon Cordell". Note: This delivery receipt only acknowledges that the message was displayed
on the recipient’s computer. There is no guarantee that the recipient has
read or understood the message contents. 13 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 442. Wood, Peter
_Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1523,1524,1525,1526,1527,1528, 1529,1530,1531,1532,1533,1534, 1535,1536,1537,1538,1539,1540,1541,1542,1543, From: Wood, Peter [Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 06 February 2015 10:41 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon
Cordell Dear Lorraine/Simon, Ø Just a quick note to let you know that I will
be on holiday from 12/2/15 returning on 9/3/15, so if you need
anything in the meantime please communicate with Andy Austin. Ø Can you let me know how you get on with the
CPS and let me know if there is anything else, we can do or that you might
need from us? Ø Just to confirm, I’m sure you are onto this,
but you are currently pulling together evidence of the costs incurred by
Simon for various release fee’s following Police stop and seizures. Ø As soon as you have provided this evidence, I
can give further consideration to the compensation aspect of your complaint. Ø I would prefer to deal with this myself when I
return after the 9/3/15, I hope that’s acceptable to you but if not
please let me know and I will put something in place so that this can be
handled in my absence. Ø Finally, I would advise that the formal Data
Subject Access Request you previously made has gone to our Data Protection
Officer. Ø He is aware that I have already provided the
Indemnity Letter and some key call recordings to assist you. They are dealing
with your request and he has asked that I send you his initial response, I
have pasted this in below for your information – Dear Mr Cordell Ø Further to your ongoing correspondence with
Peter Wood in our Motor Operation, your request for information has been passed
to me and whilst I can see we have fulfilled that request in part by sending
you specific data, we would like to fulfil the element of your request which
is a Subject Access Request. Ø We apologise that this element of your request
was not dealt with as quickly as it should have been. Ø Accordingly, we will now gather relevant data
and write to you with the results of that data gathering exercise as soon as
possible. Ø As Peter has already communicated, we will
charge no fee for this request on this occasion. Ø Please do not hesitate to contact me if you
have any queries. With kind regards Paul Donovan Global Data Protection Officer | Canopius Holdings UK Limited |
Gallery 9 | One Lime Street | London | EC3M 7HA D +44 (0) 20 7337 3796 | M +44 (0) 7584 102572 www.canopius.com I trust that’s everything for now, have a good weekend and no doubt we
will be in contact soon. If you need anything else, just shout! Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ 1524, D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 02 February 2015 15:08 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø Thank you for the reply
to my email Ø Yes, the below would
cover everything I feel, Ø so, if you can go ahead
and do this, I would be most grateful. Ø As said, I just do not
want any way that the CSP and Court could have any confusion with anything. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 02 February 2015 14:56 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Lorraine, Ø
Thanks for your comments, don’t
worry I want to get this resolved as much as you and Simon, it’s taken far
too Ø
long already, so before I send
an amended Indemnity Letter (LOI) please confirm my understanding as listed
below – Ø I
will amend the registration of the Ford Zetec to show MA57LDY. Broadsure
originally gave us the incorrect registration and as you say it was a while
before this error was corrected and our policy history was confusing due to
the incorrect Clio that I was not aware of previously. Ø You
are correct, looking back on the instructions from Broadsure I cannot see
that they instructed Underwriters to delete the Renault Clio that was added
in error following receipt of advices from Broadsure. Ø I
can amend the comment in the letter to show that this vehicle was added to
the policy incorrectly following an effort on your part to correct the
registration number of the Ford Zetec and was a broker error, are you happy
with this? Ø The
letter states cover was for Social Domestic & Pleasure and Motor Trade
Use. Ø Motor
Trade use would cover Simon to carry a Motor Mechanics tools being used in
connection with Motor Trade but not any tools that would typically be used
for any other purposes such as perhaps,
paint/brushes/ladders/plumbing/Electrical (domestic/commercial except auto
electrical) and so on. Ø This
is standard cover; however, I am happy to expand on this statement in the
letter if you would like me to in order to clarify that point? Ø The
Police officer asked if Simon would be covered for the carriage of tools to
drive around doing “odd jobs”. Ø Later
in the call he again confirmed that Simon was not covered “to drive around
doing jobs”. Ø I
sent you the call so you can listen to it yourself but the tone of the
enquiry was suggesting that Simon was doing jobs not connected to the Motor
Trade however I do feel there is plenty of room here for misunderstanding. Ø If
the question had been more specific with the officer stating that Simon had
tools connected with the Motor Trade in the vehicle would he be covered –
Yes. Ø If
he said that the tools were not connected to the Motor Trade (as per my
comments above) then the answer is – No. Ø Not
something I can put into a Letter of Indemnity but certainly something to be
argued with the CPS/Courts. Ø I’m
happy to confirm in the letter that cover was in force under this policy on
the 14/11/2013. Ø Once
I hear back from you, I will revise the LOI accordingly and e‐mail it
across for you to sign off, I will also send an original in the post just in
case! 1465, If you need anything else
please do not hesitate to drop me and Andy a line, I am keeping Andy in the
loop as I will be on leave from 12/2/15 – 9/3/15 so he will need to deal with
anything in my absence. 1525,1526,1527,1528,1529,1530,1531,1532,1533,1534,1535,1536,1537,1538,1539, 1540,1541,1542,1543, 14 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 443. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ MT3574694 Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1544,1545,1546,1547,1548,1549,1550, 1551,1552,1553,1554,1555,1556, 1557,1558,1559,1560,1561,1562,1563,1564, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 11:12 To: 'Wood, Peter' Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon
Cordell Dear Peter Ø I have sent the information over to the CSP I
am waiting for a reply from them, I do believe however there is now an appeal
date of the 05/03/2015 which I am trying to confirm due to not getting
any letters from the court. Ø As for the data we need from the compound I
have had to put a subject access request in, not sure how long this is going
to take, but as soon as I heard anything, Ø I will let you know, thank you again for
dealing with this matter Ø and I am sure we will talk soon; hope you have
a great holiday. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 06 February 2015 10:41 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Lorraine/Simon, Ø
Just a quick note to let you
know that I will be on holiday from 12/2/15 returning on 9/3/15,
so if you need anything in the meantime please communicate with Andy Austin. Ø
Can you let me know how you get
on with the CPS and let me know if there is anything else, we can do or that
you might need from us? Ø
Just to confirm, I’m sure you
are onto this, but you are currently pulling together evidence of the costs
incurred by Simon for various release fee’s following Police stop and
seizures. Ø
As soon as you have provided
this evidence, I can give further consideration to the compensation aspect of
your complaint. Ø
I would prefer to deal with
this myself when I return after the 9/3/15, I hope that’s acceptable
to you but if not please let me know and I will put something in place so
that this can be handled in my absence. Ø
Finally, I would advise that
the formal Data Subject Access Request you previously made has gone to our
Data Protection Officer. Ø
He is aware that I have already
provided the Indemnity Letter and some key call recordings to assist you.
They are dealing with your request and he has asked that I send you his
initial response, I have pasted this in below for your information – Dear Mr Cordell Ø
Further to your ongoing
correspondence with Peter Wood in our Motor Operation, your request for
information has been passed to me and whilst I can see we have fulfilled that
request in part by sending you specific data, we would like to fulfil the
element of your request which is a Subject Access Request. Ø
We apologise that this element
of your request was not dealt with as quickly as it should have been. Ø
Accordingly, we will now gather
relevant data and write to you with the results of that data gathering
exercise as soon as possible. Ø
As Peter has already
communicated, we will charge no fee for this request on this occasion. Ø
Please do not hesitate to
contact me if you have any queries. 1545,1546,1547,1548,1549,1550,1551,1552,1553,1554,1555,1556,1557,1558,1559,1560, 1561,1562,1563,1564, 15 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 444. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (28) /
Page Numbers: 1565, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 15:24 To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com' Cc: 'm.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: S Cordell 020215.pdf MT Under writing _FW_ MR
SIMON CORDELL CX52 JRZ.pdf RE_ MT3574694 Simon
Cordell_KGM.pdf Ø
Part 1 of 3 email. Ø
please see attached the way in
which Simon has been treated by police and the lies one police office said to
his insurance KGM this is due to be at Kingston upon Thames crown court on
the 05/03/2013 and this is the information KGM has sent. I do have all the emails
from KGM that has gone back and forward since Simon was pulled by police on
the 14/11/2013 I have to send this in a few emails due to the size not
sure if you are getting them Regards Lorraine 16 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 445. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (3) /
Page Numbers: 1566, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 15:26 To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com' Cc: 'm.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com' Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: s Cordell call from police 141113.wma Ø
part 2 of 3 email Audio file of
police talking to KGM on the day Simon was pulled on the 14/11/2013
when the police lied to get Simon insurance voided. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 15:24 To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com' Cc: 'm.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Ø
Part 1 of 3 email. Ø
please see attached the way in
which Simon has been treated by police and the lies one police office said to
his insurance KGM this is due to be at Kingston upon Thames crown court on
the 05/03/2013 and this is the information KGM has sent. I do have all the emails
from KGM that has gone back and forward since Simon was pulled by police on
the 14/11/2013 I have to send this in a few emails due to the size not
sure if you are getting them Regards Lorraine 17 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 446. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ Re_ Simon Cordell_
(1) / Page Numbers: 1567, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 15:28 To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com' Cc: 'm.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com' Subject: FW: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: 26_11_2013_13_53__KellyTiller Kelly call
to compound.wav Ø
Part 3 of 3 Audio file from KGM
of when Simon went to police compound to prove in fact there was not tools in
his van so his insurance would not be stopped. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 15:26 To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com' Cc: 'm.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com' Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Ø
part 2 of 3 email Audio file of
police talking to KGM on the day Simon was pulled on the 14/11/2013
when the police lied to get Simon insurance voided. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 15:24 To: 'josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com' Cc: 'm.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Ø
Part 1 of 3 email. Ø
please see attached the way in
which Simon has been treated by police and the lies one police office said to
his insurance KGM this is due to be at Kingston upon Thames crown court on
the 05/03/2013 and this is the information KGM has sent. I do have all the emails
from KGM that has gone back and forward since Simon was pulled by police on
the 14/11/2013 I have to send this in a few emails due to the size not
sure if you are getting them Regards Lorraine 18 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 447. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1568,1569, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 15:41 To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’ Cc: 'listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: s Cordell call from police 141113.wma Dear Debbie Barnett CPS:
and Sheila from the Listing Office at the crown court. Ø I did send the below
email with all attachments, Ø but I don't think
anyone got it due to its size. Ø I am resending it in 3
parts. Ø Please see Attached
files and please read below email. Ø could you please also
let me know you have got this email. Ø I did also call
yesterday and was told you was not in the office and spoke to someone who
told me an appeal date has been set for the 05/03/2015 the crown
court. Ø I have also spoke to
Sheila today at the Crown court listing office where I told her that we had
not had any letters from the crown court she also told me that they did not
get any emails I sent over. Ø I do not have the case
number and asked her if she could send the letter that was sent out by email
to this email address. Ø Could all attached
documents be attached to the case files please? Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57 To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’ Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett Ø Thank you for taking
the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Ø Could you please also
confirm by email that you have this email. Ø As explained, there
have been a number of issues with my son Simon Cordell Ø DOB: Ø The issues are one of not
being insured. Ø When in fact he was. Ø There was a case heard
on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my son Simon
Cordell was found guilty of using his vehicle for business purposes. Ø This was only the case
due to the police officer lying. Ø Not just to KGM who my
son was insured with, but in his statement of facts, and also on oath to the
judge and CPS. 1569, 19 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 448. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1570,1571,1572, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 16:40 To: 'listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk' Cc: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: Si Appeal Case Audio
_ KGM. Rar Dear Debbie Barnett CPS: and Sheila from the Listing Office at the
crown court. Ø Not sure if this will work but I have put the
audio into a rar format to see if it will send. Ø But can you please read the below emails as
this explains what has gone on. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 16:27 To: 'listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk' Cc: London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett CPS:
and Sheila from the Listing Office at the crown court. Ø It does seem I am
having trouble with sending the audio files could you please tell me how I
can send them I have put the other files in but not the audio which will need
to be put with his case files. Ø Please read below
emails. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 15:41 To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’ Cc: 'listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk'; ' Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett CPS:
and Sheila from the Listing Office at the crown court. Ø I did send the below
email with all attachments, Ø but I don't think
anyone got it due to its size. Ø I am resending it in 3
parts. Ø Please see Attached
files and please read below email. Ø could you please also
let me know you have got this email. Ø I did also call
yesterday and was told you was not in the office and spoke to someone who
told me an appeal date has been set for the 05/03/2015 the crown
court. Ø I have also spoke to
Sheila today at the Crown court listing office where I told her that we had
not had any letters from the crown court she also told me that they did not
get any emails I sent over. Ø I do not have the case
number and asked her if she could send the letter that was sent out by email
to this email address. Ø Could all attached
documents be attached to the case files please? 1571, Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57 To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’ Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett Ø Thank you for taking
the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Ø Could you please also
confirm by email that you have this email. Ø As explained, there
have been a number of issues with my son Simon Cordell Ø DOB: Ø The issues are one of
not being insured. Ø When in fact he was. Ø There was a case heard
on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my son Simon Cordell
was found guilty of using his vehicle for business purposes. Ø This was only the case
due to the police officer lying. Ø Not just to KGM who my
son was insured with, but in his statement of facts, and also on oath to the
judge and CPS. Ø The case is such that
on the day my son was stopped the police office made a call to KGM the police
office told KGM that my son Simon Cordell had lots of tools in his van and
was doing odd jobs. Ø Under my son insurance
this would not have covered him, and the police officer would have known this
already as my son had given the police officer his policy at the side of the
road. Ø My son was arrested and
taken to the police station. Ø Due to him refusing to
sign the seizer notice and telling the police officer he was lying and to
arrest him. Ø My sons Van
registration CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound,
with no tools in there. Ø The police office when
wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call but with
something totally incorrect information. Ø The judge asked the
police office at court about the tools as he saw emails from KGM the police
office told the judge he knew nothing about any tools. Ø The police officer I
believed new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls was already
being put into the police about complaints. Ø So changed his story in
his statement. Ø The facts are that
there are audio tapes of what the police officer said to KGM, and also the
call that was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all calls. Ø I have both of the
audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a
manager sent to Kelly Tiller at KGM. Ø How can a police
officer act in such a manner? Ø I really do not
understand why he did this. Ø As also said on the
phone there is a number of summons my son has not had regarding the other
stops from police, these cases he has gone to court without him knowing and
he been found guilty when he did not even know there was a case in court. Ø I have sent many emails
to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to the court. Ø 2 case we had to do
statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for Bromley. Ø The Willesden one seems
to have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing
again he was found guilty but they put this case under a new case number
looking at the letter so all the documents that were sent before was not with
the court file I would have through. Ø But with both statutory
declarations we added a copy of his insurance. Ø I have been trying for
some time to get all of this put together so it can all be addresses and so
far, nothing has been done with all the emails I have sent to the court. Ø We also asked at court
when we went to Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, but nothing was done. Ø Could you please tell
us where we can sort this out about getting all? 1572, Ø the other cases
addressed without the need to be going from one court to the next. Ø This is a waste of courts
time and money when clearly all that is needed to be is check my son's
insurance that he was in fact insured. Ø I am sure that the letter that has been sent of
Indemnity from KGM would cover these other cases as proof he was in fact
insured. Ø
Could
you please advise what needs to be done with these other cases? Ø
Please
can you address the issues in this email and get back to me by email. Regards Lorraine Cordell 20 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 449. Kingston Crown, Listing _RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1573,1574,1575, From: Kingston Crown, Listing [Listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 16:59 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: DOC008.PDF Dear Lorraine Ø Please find enclosed
letter that would have been sent via recorded delivery on 02.02.15. Regards Karen
Mitchell Listing Team Kingston upon Thames
Crown Court (T) 020 8240 2500 (Gold fax) 0870 324 0157 listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk "I am not authorised
to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or
other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via
electronic means". From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 16:27 To: Kingston Crown, Listing Cc: London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk; GLSWESTERNMCENQ Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Ø Dear
Debbie Barnett CPS: and Sheila from the Listing Office at the crown court. It
does seem I am having It
does seem I am having trouble with sending the audio files could you please
tell me how I can send them I have put the other files in but not the audio which
will need to be put with his case files. Ø Please read below
emails. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 15:41 To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’ Cc: 'listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk'; 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett CPS:
and Sheila from the Listing Office at the crown court. Ø I did send the below
email with all attachments, Ø but I don't think
anyone got it due to its size. Ø I am resending it in 3
parts. Part
1 of 3 email 1574, Ø Please see Attached
files and please read below email. Ø could you please also
let me know you have got this email. Ø I did also call
yesterday and was told you was not in the office and spoke to someone who
told me an appeal date has been set for the 05/03/2015 the crown
court. Ø I have also spoke to
Sheila today at the Crown court listing office where I told her that we had
not had any letters from the crown court she also told me that they did not
get any emails I sent over. Ø I do not have the case
number and asked her if she could send the letter that was sent out by email
to this email address. Ø Could all attached
documents be attached to the case files please? Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57 To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’ Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett Thank you for taking the
time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Could you please also confirm by email that you have this
email. As explained, there have been a number of issues with my son Simon
Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981.the issues
are one of not being insured. When in fact he was. There was a case heard on
the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my son Simon
Cordell was found guilty. Of using his vehicle for business purposes. This
was only the case due to the police officer lying. Not just to KGM who my son
was insured with, but in his statement of facts, and also on oath to the
judge and CPS. The case is such that on the day my son was stopped the police
office made a call to KGM the police office told KGM that my son Simon
Cordell had lots of tools in his van and was doing odd jobs. Under my son
insurance this would not have covered him, and the police officer would have
known this already as my son had given the police officer his policy at the
side of the road. My son was arrested and taken to the police station. Due to
him refusing to sign the seizer notice and telling the police officer he was
lying and to arrest him. My sons Van registration CX52JRZ was seized and
taken to Chariton police vehicle pound, with no tools in there. The police
office when wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call
but with something totally incorrect information. The judge asked the police
office at court about the tools as he saw emails from KGM the police office
told the judge he knew nothing about any tools. The police officer I believed
new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls was already being
put into the police about complaints. So changed his story in his statement
the facts are that there are audio tapes of what the police officer said to
KGM, and also the call that was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM
record all calls. I have both of the audio files from KGM and also a Letter
of Indemnity and an email that a manager sent to Kelly Tiller at KGM. How can
a police officer act in such a manner? I really do not understand why he did
this. 1575, As also said on the phone
there is a number of summons my son has not had regarding the other stops
from police, these cases he has gone to court without him knowing and he been
found guilty when he did not even know there was a case in court. I have sent
many emails to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to
the court. 2 case we had to do statutory declarations one for Willesden and
one for Bromley. The Willesden one seems to have been reheard at court on the
26/01/2015 without us knowing
again he was found guilty but they put this case under a new case number
looking at the letter so all the documents that were sent before was not with
the court file I would have through. But with both statutory declarations we added
a copy of his insurance. I have been trying for some time to get all of this
put together so it can all be addresses and so far, nothing has been done
with all the emails I have sent to the court. We also asked at court when we
went to Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, but nothing was done. Could you please
tell us where we can sort this out about getting all the other cases
addressed without the need to be going from one court to the next. This is a
waste of courts time and money when clearly all that is needed to be is check
my son’s insurance that he was in fact insured. I am sure that the letter
that has been sent of Indemnity from KGM would cover these other cases as
proof he was in fact insured. Could you please advise what needs to be done
with these other cases? Please can you address
the issues in this email and get back to me by email. Regards Lorraine Cordell This email was scanned by
the Government Secure Intranet antivirus service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of
problems, please call your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the
GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is
not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure
medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone
else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in
response to this message by email. This email (whether you are the sender or
the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content
may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The original
of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 21 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 450. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (1) /
Page Numbers: 1576,1577, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 16:27 To: 'listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk' Cc: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’; 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: AppealCaseDrivingTools26112014. pdf; S Cordell
020215.pdf; MT Under writing _FW_ MR
SIMON CORDELL CX52JRZ.pdf Dear Debbie Barnett CPS:
and Sheila from the Listing Office at the crown court. Ø It does seem I am
having trouble with sending the audio files could you please tell me how I
can send them I have put the other files in but not the audio which will need
to be put with his case files. Ø Please read below
emails. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 15:41 To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’ Cc: 'listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk'; 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett CPS:
and Sheila from the Listing Office at the crown court. Ø I did send the below
email with all attachments, Ø but I don't think
anyone got it due to its size. Ø I am resending it in 3
parts. Part 1 of 3 email Ø Please see Attached
files and please read below email. Ø could you please also
let me know you have got this email. Ø I did also call
yesterday and was told you was not in the office and spoke to someone who
told me an appeal date has been set for the 05/03/2015 the crown
court. Ø I have also spoke to
Sheila today at the Crown court listing office where I told her that we had not
had any letters from the crown court she also told me that they did not get
any emails I sent over. Ø I do not have the case
number and asked her if she could send the letter that was sent out by email
to this email address. Ø Could all attached
documents be attached to the case files please? Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57 To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’ Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett Thank you for taking the
time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Could you please also confirm by email that you have this
email. 1577, As explained, there have been a number of issues
with my son Simon Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981.
The issues are one of not being insured. When in fact he was. There was a
case heard on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my
son Simon Cordell was found guilty. Of using his vehicle for business
purposes. This was only the case due to the police officer lying. Not just to
KGM who my son was insured with, but in his statement of facts, and also on
oath to the judge and CPS. The case is such that on the day my son was
stopped the police office made a call to KGM the police office told KGM that
my son Simon Cordell had lots of tools in his van and was doing odd jobs.
Under my son insurance this would not have covered him, and the police
officer would have known this already as my son had given the police officer
his policy at the side of the road. My son was arrested and taken to the
police station. Due to him refusing to sign the seizer notice and telling the
police officer he was lying and to arrest him. My sons Van registration
CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound, with no tools
in there. The police office when wrote his statement not with what he told
KGM on the phone call but with something totally incorrect information. The
judge asked the police office at court about the tools as he saw emails from
KGM the police office told the judge he knew nothing about any tools. The
police officer I believed new he could not put tools down in his statement as
calls was already being put into the police about complaints. So changed his
story in his statement. The facts are that there are audio tapes of what the
police officer said to KGM, and also the call that was made to Chariton
police vehicle pound as KGM record all calls. I have both of the audio files
from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a manager sent to
Kelly Tiller at KGM. How can a police officer act in such a manner? I really
do not understand why he did this. As also said on the phone there is a
number of summons my son has not had regarding the other stops from police,
these cases he has gone to court without him knowing and he been found guilty
when he did not even know there was a case in court. I have sent many emails
to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to the court. 2
case we had to do statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for
Bromley. The Willesden one seems to have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing again he was
found guilty but they put this case under a new case number looking at the
letter so all the documents that were sent before was not with the court file
I would have through. But with both statutory declarations we added a copy of
his insurance. I have been trying for some time to get all of this put
together so it can all be addresses and so far, nothing has been done with
all the emails I have sent to the court. We also asked at court when we went
to Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, but nothing was done. Could you please tell
us where we can sort this out about getting all the other cases addressed
without the need to be going from one court to the next. This is a waste of
courts time and money when clearly all that is needed to be is check my son’s
insurance that he was in fact insured. I am sure that the letter that has
been sent of Indemnity from KGM would cover these other cases as proof he was
in fact insured. Could you please advise what needs to be done with these
other cases? Please can you address the issues in this email and get back to
me by email. Regards Lorraine Cordell 59. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 59 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.06.2015_RE Re Simon
Cordell_001 06/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 493,494,495,496,497,498 499,500,501,502 -- 493, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 06 February 2015 16:27 To: listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk Cc: London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: Appeal-Case-Driving-Tools-26-11-2014.pdf S Cordell 020215.pdf MT Underwriting-FW-MR-SIMON-CORDELL - CX52
JRZ.pdf Dear Debbie Barnett CPS: and Sheila from the Listing Office at the crown
court. Ø It does seem I am
having trouble with sending the audio files could you please tell me how I
can send them I have put the other files in but not the audio which will need
to be put with his case files. Ø Please read below
emails. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 06 February 2015 15:41 To: London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk Cc: listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell Ø I did send the below
email with all attachments, Ø but I don't think
anyone got it due to its size. Ø I am resending it in 3
parts. Part 1 of 3 email Ø Please see Attached
files and please read below email. Ø could you please also
let me know you have got this email. Ø I did also call
yesterday and was told you was not in the office and spoke to someone who
told me an appeal date has been set for the 05/03/2015 the crown
court. Ø I have also spoke to
Sheila today at the Crown court listing office where I told her that we had
not had any letters from the crown court she also told me that they did not
get any emails I sent over. Ø I do not have the case
number and asked her if she could send the letter that was sent out by email
to this email address. Ø Could all attached
documents be attached to the case files please? Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57 To: 'London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk' Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Dear Debbie Barnett Thank you for taking the time to talk to me today
on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Could you please also confirm by email that
you have this email. 494, As explained, there have been a number of issues
with my son Simon Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981. The issues are one of not being insured. When in
fact he was. There was a case heard on the 26/11/2014 at
Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my son Simon Cordell was found guilty. Of
using his vehicle for business purposes. This was only the case due to the police officer
lying. Not just to KGM who my son was insured with, but in his statement of
facts, and also on oath to the judge and CPS. The case is such that on the day my son was
stopped the police office made a call to KGM the police office told KGM that
my son Simon Cordell had lots of tools in his van and was doing odd jobs.
Under my son insurance this would not have covered him, and the police
officer would have known this already as my son had given the police officer
his policy at the side of the road. My son was arrested and taken to the police
station. Due to him refusing to sign the seizer notice and telling the police
officer he was lying and to arrest him. My sons Van registration CX52JRZ was seized and
taken to Chariton police vehicle pound, with no tools in there. The police office when wrote his statement not
with what he told KGM on the phone call but with something totally incorrect
information. The judge asked the police office at court about the tools as he
saw emails from KGM the police office told the judge he knew nothing about
any tools. The police officer I believed new he could not
put tools down in his statement as calls was already being put into the
police about complaints. So changed his story in his statement. The facts are that there are audio tapes of what
the police officer said to KGM, and also the call that was made to Chariton
police vehicle pound as KGM record all calls. I have both of the audio files from KGM and also
a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a manager sent to Kelly Tiller at
KGM. How can a police officer act in such a manner? I
really do not understand why he did this. As also said on the phone there is a number of
summons my son has not had regarding the other stops from police, these cases
he has gone to court without him knowing and he been found guilty when he did
not even know there was a case in court. I have sent many emails to get these cases set
aside and sent his insurance documents to the court. 2 case we had to do
statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for Bromley. The Willesden
one seems to have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing
again he was found guilty but they put this case under a new case number
looking at the letter so all the documents that were sent before was not with
the court file I would have through. But with both statutory declarations we
added a copy of his insurance. I have been trying for some time to get all of
this put together so it can all be addresses and so far, nothing has been
done with all the emails I have sent to the court. We also asked at court
when we went to Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, but nothing was done. Could you
please tell us where we can sort this out about getting all the other cases
addressed without the need to be going from one court to the next. This is a
waste of courts time and money when clearly all that is needed to be is check
my son's insurance that he was in fact insured. I am sure
that the letter that has been sent of Indemnity from KGM would cover these
other cases as proof he was in fact insured. Could you please advise what
needs to be done with these other cases? Please can you address the issues in this email
and get back to me by email. Regards Lorraine Cordell 495,
End of Picture! 496,
End of Picture! 497,
End of Picture! 498,
End of Picture! 499, RE: Re: Simon Cordell->MT
Under writing_ FW_ MR SIMON CORDELL-4CX52 JRZ.pdf From: MT Underwriting [MT.Underwriting@canopius.com] Sent: 04 December 2014 15:34 To: Gramlick, Les Subject: FW: MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Kelly Tiller Ø Member of the UK
Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London |
E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9116 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: GARETH.Mullett@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: GARETH.MuNett@met.pnn.police.uk On Behalf Of VresCharlton@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 November 2013 14:10 To: Tiller, Kelly Subject: RE: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Kelly, Ø Kelly, I looked at the seizure notice nothing was
taken at the roadside Ø and nothing was registered as left in the vehicle. Regards Gareth From: Tiller, Kelly [ mailto: Kelly.Tiller@canopius.com Sent: 25 November 2013 16:28 To: VRES Mailbox - Charlton Subject: RE: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Ø I have been told by the
police that you do a report on all items that was in the vehicle at the time
it was ceased. Ø Can I have a copy of
this report please? Kind regards Kelly Tiller Fleet Underwriting | KGM Motor Insurance - Member of the Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1818
| F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Sarah.Williams6@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:
Sarah.Williams6@met.pnn.police.uk On Behalf Of VresCharlton@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 25 November 2013 16:26 To: Tiller, Kelly Subject: RE: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Ø We have no record what
was in the vehicle, Ø we do not touch the
vehicles contents. Regards F S Williams file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 500, Page 2 of 4 From: Tiller, Kelly [ mailto: Kelly.Tiller@eanopius.com Sent: 25 November 2013 10:55 To: VRES Mailbox - Charlton Subject: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Morning, Ø I need some assistance
with regards to the above. Ø We ensure Mr Simon
Cordell and I need a copy of the report of the items that was in his vehicle
at the time it was ceased. Ø We are due to cancel
his policy @ noon today. Ø Your urgent advises are
awaited. Your urgent advises are awaited. Kind regards Kelly Tiller Fleet Underwriting | KGM Motor Insurance - Member of the Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1818 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Syndicate
260 which is managed by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA |
Registered in England and Wales Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We
are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary. file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 501, Page 3 of 4 NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject
to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of
the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please
notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to
conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts
no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Syndicate
260 which is managed by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery
9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We
are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary. NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject
to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of
the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please
notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to
conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 502, Page 4 of 4 The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached
with other employees or agents. The security of this email and any
attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but
malicious software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Twitter: @metpoliceuk file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 60. Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 60 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.06.2015_Re Simon Cordell 06/02/2015 /
Page Numbers: 503,504 505,506,507,508,509 Should
be 28 pages -- 503, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 06 February 2015 15:24 To: josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com Cc: mc.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: S Cordell 020215.pdf. MT Underwriting_ MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ.pdf.
RE_MT3574694 Simon Cordell_KGM.pdf Ø
Part 1 of 3 email. Ø
please see attached the way in
which Simon has been treated by police and the lies one police office said to
his insurance KGM this is due to be at Kingston upon Thames crown court on
the 05/03/2013 and this is the information KGM has sent. I do have all the emails from KGM that has gone
back and forward since Simon was pulled by police on the 14/11/2013 I
have to send this in a few emails due to the size not sure if you are getting
them Regards Lorraine 504,
End of Picture! 505,
End of Picture! 506, Re: Simon Cordell->MT
Underwriting_ MR SIMON.CX52 JRZ.pdf From: MT Underwriting [MT.Underwriting@canopius.com] Sent: 04 December 2014
15:34 To: Gramlick, Les Subject: FW: MR SIMON CORDELL - CX52
JRZ Kelly Tiller Member of the UK Specialty
Division of Canopus Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9116 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: GARETH.Mullett@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: GARETH.MuNett@met.pnn.police.uk On Behalf Of VresCharlton@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 November 2013 14:10 To: Tiller, Kelly Subject: RE: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Kelly, Ø Kelly, I looked at the seizure notice nothing was
taken at the roadside Ø and nothing was registered as left in the vehicle. Regards Gareth From: Tiller, Kelly mailto: Kelly.Tiller@canopius.com Sent: 25 November 2013 16:28 To: VRES Mailbox - Charlton Subject: RE: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Ø I have been told by the
police that you do a report on all items that was in the vehicle at the time
it was ceased. Ø Can I have a copy of
this report please? Kind regards Kelly Tiller Fleet Underwriting | KGM Motor Insurance - Member of the Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1818 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Sarah.Williams6@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:
Sarah.Williams6@met.pnn.police.uk On Behalf Of VresCharlton@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 25 November 2013 16:26 To: Tiller, Kelly Subject: RE: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Ø We have no record what
was in the vehicle, Ø we do not touch the
vehicles contents. Regards F S Williams file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 507, Page 2 of 4 From: Tiller, Kelly [ mailto: Kelly.Tiller@eanopius.com Sent: 25 November 2013 10:55 To: VRES Mailbox - Charlton Subject: MR SI MON CORDELL - CX52 JRZ Morning, Ø I need some assistance
with regards to the above. Ø We ensure Mr Simon
Cordell and I need a copy of the report of the items that was in his vehicle
at the time it was ceased. Ø We are due to cancel
his policy @ noon today. Ø Your urgent advises are
awaited. Kind regards Kelly Tiller Fleet Underwriting | KGM Motor Insurance - Member of the Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1818 | F +44 (0) 20 8530 1841 www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Syndicate
260 which is managed by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery
9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We
are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary. file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 508, Page 3 of 4 NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject
to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of
the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please
notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to
conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts
no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Syndicate
260 which is managed by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery
9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We
are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary. NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject
to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of
the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please
notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to
conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 509, Page 4 of 4 The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached
with other employees or agents. The security of this email and any
attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but
malicious software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Twitter: @metpoliceuk file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/3a5148a85fd442038750be9b13d... 30/01/2015 510+, Re: Simon Cordell->RE_ SIMON COrdell_KGM.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:06 February 2015 11:12 To: ’Wood, Peter’ Subject RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø
I have sent the information
over to the CSP I am waiting for a reply from them, I do believe however
there is now an appeal date of the 05/03/2015 which I am trying to
confirm due to not getting any letters from the court. Ø
As for the data we need from
the compound I have had to put a subject access request in, not sure how long
this is going to take, but as soon as I heard anything, Ø
I will let you know, thank you
again for dealing with this matter Ø
and I am sure we will talk
soon; hope you have a great holiday. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter mailto: Peter.Wood@canopius.com Sent: 06 February 2015 10:41 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Lorraine/Simon, Ø
Just a quick note to let you
know that I will be on holiday from 12/2/15 returning on 9/3/15,
so if you need anything in the meantime please communicate with Andy Austin. Ø
Can you let me know how you get
on with the CPS and let me know if there is anything else, we can do or that
you might need from us? Ø
Just to confirm, I’m sure you
are onto this, but you are currently pulling together evidence of the costs
incurred by Simon for various release fee’s following Police stop and
seizures. Ø
As soon as you have provided
this evidence, I can give further consideration to the compensation aspect of
your complaint. Ø
I would prefer to deal with
this myself when I return after the 9/3/15, I hope that’s acceptable
to you but if not please let me know and I will put something in place so
that this can be handled in my absence. Ø
Finally, I would advise that
the formal Data Subject Access Request you previously made has gone to our
Data Protection Officer. Ø
He is aware that I have already
provided the Indemnity Letter and some key call recordings to assist you.
They are dealing with your request and he has asked that I send you his
initial response, I have pasted this in below for your information – Dear Mr Cordell Ø
Further to your ongoing
correspondence with Peter Wood in our Motor Operation, your request for
information has been passed to me and whilst I can see we have fulfilled that
request in part by sending you specific data, we would like to fulfil the
element of your request which is a Subject Access Request. Ø
We apologise that this element
of your request was not dealt with as quickly as it should have been. Ø
Accordingly, we will now gather
relevant data and write to you with the results of that data gathering
exercise as soon as possible. Ø
As Peter has already
communicated, we will charge no fee for this request on this occasion. Ø
Please do not hesitate to
contact me if you have any queries. file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 511+, Page 2 of21 Global Data Protection Officer | Canopius Holdings UK Limited | Gallery 9 | One Lime Street | London | EC3M 7HA D +44 (0) 20 7337 3796 | M +44 (0) 7584 102572 www.canopius.com l I trust that's everything for now, have a good weekend and no doubt we
will be in contact soon. If you need anything else, just shout! Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 02 February 2015 15:08 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø Thank you for the reply
to my email Ø Yes, the below would
cover everything I feel, Ø so, if you can go ahead
and do this, I would be most grateful. Ø As said, I just do not
want any way that the CSP and Court could have any confusion with anything. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter mailto: Peter.Wood@canopius.com Sent: 02 February 2015 14:56 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Lorraine, Ø
Thanks for your comments, don’t
worry I want to get this resolved as much as you and Simon, it’s taken far
too Ø
long already, so before I send
an amended Indemnity Letter (LOI) please confirm my understanding as listed
below – Ø I
will amend the registration of the Ford Zetec to show MA57LDY. Broadsure
originally gave us the incorrect registration and as you say it was a while
before this error was corrected and our policy history was confusing due to
the incorrect Clio that I was not aware of previously. Ø You
are correct, looking back on the instructions from Broadsure I cannot see
that they instructed Underwriters to delete the Renault Clio that was added
in error following receipt of advices from Broadsure. I can amend the comment
in the letter to file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 512+, Page 3 of21 Ø show
that this vehicle was added to the policy incorrectly following an effort on
your part to correct the registration number of the Ford Zetec and was a
broker error, are you happy with this? Ø The
letter states cover was for Social Domestic & Pleasure and Motor Trade
Use. Ø Motor
Trade use would cover Simon to carry a Motor Mechanics tools being used in
connection with Motor Trade but not any tools that would typically be used
for any other purposes such as perhaps,
paint/brushes/ladders/plumbing/Electrical (domestic/commercial except auto
electrical) and so on. Ø This
is standard cover; however, I am happy to expand on this statement in the
letter if you would like me to in order to clarify that point? Ø The
Police officer asked if Simon would be covered for the carriage of tools to
drive around doing “odd jobs”. Ø Later
in the call he again confirmed that Simon was not covered “to drive around
doing jobs”. Ø I
sent you the call so you can listen to it yourself but the tone of the
enquiry was suggesting that Simon was doing jobs not connected to the Motor
Trade however I do feel there is plenty of room here for misunderstanding. Ø If
the question had been more specific with the officer stating that Simon had
tools connected with the Motor Trade in the vehicle would he be covered –
Yes. Ø If
he said that the tools were not connected to the Motor Trade (as per my
comments above) then the answer is – No. Ø Not
something I can put into a Letter of Indemnity but certainly something to be
argued with the CPS/Courts. Ø I’m
happy to confirm in the letter that cover was in force under this policy on
the 14/11/2013. Ø Once
I hear back from you, I will revise the LOI accordingly and e‐mail it
across for you to sign off, I will also send an original in the post just in
case! 1465, If you need anything else
please do not hesitate to drop me and Andy a line, I am keeping Andy in the
loop as I will be on leave from 12/2/15 – 9/3/15 so he will need to deal with
anything in my absence. From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 January 2015 01:47 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø
Thank you very much for the
information you have sent, I do see some errors in your letter of Indemnity.
Ø
This registration was always
put in not correctly but was in fact given to Broadsure Direct correctly. Ø
The registration should have
been Ford Zetec registration MA57LDY Ø
This was later correct after
the 3rd time of telling the Ford Zetec registration as MA57LDY Ø
please see attached document. file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 513+, Page 4 of21 Ø
This is the registration that
should have been on the policy from the start. Ø
We never knew it was not
correct until 08/04/13 when again the correct registration was given. Ø
However, it was put down as
Renault Clio registration NA57LDY, Ø
we then believe it was put in
correctly and not a new car added. Ø
We were not sent any documents
of that change so did not know there was again an error until the Oct 2013
when it was in fact corrected this time, we asked for new documents to be
sent which they were so we could check. Ø
But they kept on his policy
Renault Clio registration NA57LDY we made a next call and told them this
needed to be removed and was told it would be done. Ø
It seems this was never done by
what you have sent in your email. Ø
I do believe I have emails also
about this issue to Broadsure Direct and Martin Jenkins, can confirm this as
he was the one, we dealt with at Broadsure Direct. Ø
He also should remember all the
phone calls. Ø
There is also a next issue
Simon was not just covered with the basic trade insurance with KGM, Broadsure
Direct had a special section with KGM which included in his insurance he was
in fact covered for his work as a mechanic, not just standard insurance of
trade buying and selling that KGM as a rule only deals with. Ø
This has been discussed with
the underwriters at KGM by Broadsure Direct re Martin Jenkins. Ø
This also caused issues with
his insurance cover a few times. Ø
This was also meant to have
been address and seems it was not. Ø
At the time we were not happy
as we were told he was not covered when in fact he was. Ø
If you call Broadsure Direct
and speak to Martin Jenkins, I feel that he can send you the paperwork and
under writing of how Simon’s insurance was meant to have been setup. Ø
As you can see there was a
number of issues with his insurance with KGM that lead to problems. Ø
and even with the issues of 14/11/2013
when a call was made to Kelly Tiller, we asked did the police say what
tools was meant to have been in the van as if there were mechanic tools in
there his insurance should have in fact covered this. Ø
Kelly Tiller said no the police
officer did not say which tools. Ø
But also said he was again not
insured for this again Martin Jenkins got a rude call from us and again he
had to make calls to address this issue. Ø
Can you please confirm he was
correctly insured with KGM and write this as I would like this addressed? Ø
And one last thing could you
please say in your letter on the date of the 14/11/2013 he was fully
insured just so there cannot be any mistakes at court. Ø
Sorry, this is causing such an
issue and taking up your time but I really want to have something that is
fully correct, as I do not want any other issues with courts, police and
anything else that could cause my Son problems. Regards Lorraine. From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 30 January 2015 17:02 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Austin, Andrew; Donovan, Paul Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Simon, Please find attached the following - Ø
Recording
of the original call made by the Police officer to KGM in which he advised
that there were tools in your van. Ø
Recording
of the call between Kelly Tiller and the Police compound in which Kelly was
advised that there were no tools in the vehicle. Ø
Receipt
showing purchase of the van. file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 514+, Page 5 of21 Ø
E-Mail
from Gareth Mullet from the compound confirming that there was nothing on the
seizure notice to indicate that there were any tools removed from the vehicle
or in the vehicle in the compound. Ø
Letter
of Indemnity for the CPS/Courts. Ø I believe
these are the relevant items you were after and hope this will assist you to
resolve the court matters. Ø If you
need anything else please let me know, or in my absence Andy Austin. Ø Paul
Donovan will respond separately in respect of your data request but hopefully
the attached will meet your requirements. Ø As soon as I
receive documentation from you to support costs incurred, Ø I can
consider our response on compensation. Ø No doubt
I will hear from you shortly, in the meantime have a good weekend. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 January 2015 11:14 To: Wood, Peter Cc: Austin, Andrew; complaints@lloyds.com Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Ø
Yes, please could you send the
tapes out and the Letter of Indemnity I would be most grateful as I think
this would cover the courts and would like to get the information to them as
soon as possible to the court and CPS. As for the other information that is
acceptable, Ø
as I not sure how long it will
take the police compound to send me over the information, Ø
I will need to send to you they
do take their time. Ø
I am just happy this matter is
getting address as said the most worrying thing was the court case and this
is the information I needed. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
leave. Ø
I look forward to hearing from
you and will pass the information over from the police compound as soon as I
have it. Regards Simon From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 27 January 2015 10:05 To: Lorraine Cordell file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 515+, Page 6 of21 Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Simon, Ø I
spent some time last Friday tracking down a number of calls and did find the
original call that the Police made to Jessica and the calls Kelly made to the
Compound so we can provide these and it sounds like these are the important
calls from the CPS and Courts viewpoint. Ø I
will pass these over to our Data Protection Officer of course but will ask if
its ok for me to release them to you in the meantime before he does his
official response. 438, Ø I
think we should also do the Letter of Indemnity and will send this across to
you in the next few days, there’s no reason why you can't send this across
now and it can do no harm. Ø I'm
conscious we have not done a formal final response yet to your complaint, Ø I
intend to do this as soon as we receive full details of the recovery costs
you incurred and can make a decision on compensation, Ø I
trust that’s acceptable. Ø If
you need anything else or have any questions in the meantime, please do not
hesitate to contact us. Ø I
am keeping Andy in the loop as I am due to go on leave from 12/2/15 ‐
8/3/15 Ø so,
he will need to pick up any issues that may arise during that time. Ø We
will be in touch shortly and await details from you as above in due course. King Regards Mr Peter Woods From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 26 January 2015 23:10:04 GMT To: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Cc: complaints@lloyds.com <complaints@lloyds.com> Subject: MT3574694 Simon Cordell Dear Peter Wood Ø
Thank you for picking this up
and taking the time to deal with this matter. Ø
The date of the appeal I do not
have yet. Ø
I are waiting for this but the
court and CPS said if I get the information needed before the court date then
it could be sent to the court who found me guilty and the CPS and this would
be linked to the case and addressed. In addition, there should be no need for
the appeal court case. Ø I
am trying to do this so that a next day is not got to be wasted of
my time in court and getting to and from the court. Ø The day that
the police officer pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which
the police officer lied, and the police officer has said this in court so
lied to the judge is 14/11/2013. file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 516+, Page 7 of21 Ø I think due
to what the police officer said in court the CPS and judge would like to know
the facts and Ø
what the police
officer said on that phone call to KGM. Ø
In addition, when KGM spoke to
the manager at the police compound and found out in fact there was not tools,
I think the reason for this is the police officer committed perjury in the
court. Ø
That is why they asked me to
get proof that my insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements as to
what the police officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, in
addition, the facts how KGM found out I had in fact done nothing wrong and my
insurance should not be cancelled. Ø
However, if you think a Letter
of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be done, Ø
I would be very grateful, but
could you include in the letter only reason this has come about is due to
what the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van. Ø
In addition, this is the reason
KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the insurance
policy I had in force with them. Ø
This should cover it I hope as
I really did nothing wrong and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied to
get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound and they told
her there was no tools. Ø
The vehicle registration I was
driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included
on my insurance. Ø
So, should have shown on the
database along with my car. Ø
However, none showed up as
being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me all the
problems with the police. Ø
As already aware yes, I was
stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized. I do have some of the
some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the
vehicle out of the compound for the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up
on the 16/11/2013. Ø
I have the ones for the 08/04/2013,
29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014 Ø
I just need to get the receipts
for the other dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to
no insurance from the police compound. Ø
As for the Data Subject Access
Request, I am most grateful that this is being addressed. Ø
If I had known a fee was,
needed I would have paid that right away, but due to no one getting back to
me about the ones that were put in, I did not know a fee was needed. Regards Simon Cordell From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, Ø
Unfortunately,
Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have
picked this matter up. Ø
The
first order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case, can you
confirm when the date has been set for the hearing please? Ø
My
thought is that we provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically confirms that
you had a valid policy in force between said dates and on what vehicles, this
file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 517+, Page 8 of21 Ø
should
satisfy the Courts but if they need anything else, we will be happy to
assist, just let me know what you require. Ø
I
understand you were stopped several times and had vehicles seized, you are in
the process of obtaining evidence of these vehicle seizures and the costs
incurred by you as a result for us to consider compensation. Ø
When
you have gathered this please forward the evidence to us as soon as possible. Ø
There
is also the matter of your Data Subject Access Request. Ø
I
have spent some time today tracking down recorded calls and various
communications and hove notified our Data Protection Officer of your request.
Ø
I
can see that you have made a request, any request should correctly be sent on
for the attention of the Data Protection Officer along with a £10 fee. Ø
Your
request was addressed generally to KGM with no fee and it would appear not
actioned. Ø
The
underwriter dealing with your request should have asked immediately for the
fee payment and escalated your request accordingly. Ø
This
was not done for which I must apologise, as a result we will waive the fee
requirement and I would confirm this is now in hand. Ø
We
have yet to issue a final response to your complaint and I would assure you
we will do this as soon as we have received your response to the above
points. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com <Andrew.Austin@canopius.com> Subject: FW: MT3574694 Dear Andrew Please see attached Insurance, which will show
you full details of his insurance policy and dates covered. Yes, we do want full discloser so this mater can
be sorted out by the court and I can send the information over to the CPS for
the case of the 14/11/2013 where the police officer told KGM I had tools in
my van to void my insurance. Kelly Tiller from the trade section and Jessica
know fully what went on and it was Jessica that took the phone call from the
police officer. After this I believe Kelly Tiller took over dealing with my
policy and she was the one that had the say to cancel my policy and she was
the one that believed the police until I went to the police compound and
spoke to the manager there where he spoke to Kelly Tiller. If I had not done
this Kelly Tiller would have cancelled my policy of insurance and I have all
the file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 518+, Page 9 of21 emails to prove this. After Kelly Tiller found out I was not lying
about having no tools in my van the insurance policy was kept in place, I did
ask Kelly Tiller on more than once to send me the information and put data
requests in which was not replied to. Now I have been found guilty when Kelly
Tiller knows the truth that there was not tools and the police officer lied
to KGM on the phone call. I am the one that has suffered over all this not
just on this case but all the times I have been taken to court for no
insurance over the year my policy run with KGM due to it not showing on the
MID database. You should have all the emails already from Broadsure
Direct and many was sent by them to KGM as I was told KGM could not talk to
me and I had to deal with Broadsure Direct about my policy Martin Jenkins
from Broadsure Direct should also have copies of all emails as I do. I have spoken to DVLA today and asked for the
data of how many times points was put on my licence due to not getting
summons from police and then dealing with cases I knew nothing about and then
I had to get the cases reopened, I have to write them a letter and they will
send the data I have asked for in the post. I do have a lot of letters which I will sort out
scan and send over. But the 1st part I want to deal with is the court case I
was found guilty at and have put an appeal in that is the most important to
me right now. We can deal with everything else once I get all
the data scanned as there is really a lot and it was all due to KGM not
sorting out why my insurance was not showing on the MID database. The seizers
alone have left me out of pocket by around 1700.00. That is without all the
days I have not been able to work due to my driving licence being messed up
and showing points for no insurance. All the time going back and forward to
the compound to collect my vehicles, and everything else I have had to deal
with the courts when in fact I had done nothing wrong. I have tried to deal with this for months and
months without going to the ombudsman and KGM has taken no notice, it has
taken me to go to the ombudsman for KGM to take any notice and I don’t feel
anyone would be happy with this sort of service from KGM let alone any
company doing this and file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 519+, Page 10 of 21 causing someone so much suffering. It was one of the police in the end at the
compound who in the end worked out why it was not showing up on the MID and
that was because there had been a space put within my Reg Numbers. It was
that bad two police compounds new me and said each time not again. As you can see, I am not very happy about all of
this, but I do not think anyone would be when they paid for their insurance
and had done nothing wrong to suffer all this. Therefore, could you please get the information I
need to send to the CPS, I have written what was needed from Nov 2014 and way
before this, and it still has not been sent and I have this hanging over my
head. I did not just get points on my licence I got disqualified from driving
for 6 months due to repeat offending of no insurance please tell me why when
I have paid for my insurance from KGM? The reason it has not been enforced is
due to me putting an appeal in. You can contact my mother on Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Sent: 21 January 2015 16:13 To: ’Lorraine Cordell’ Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell, file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 520+, Page 11 of 21 I have detailed the process for requesting
information under the subject access request and if you wish to proceed with
this please confirm. In the meantime, I am keen to assist you if I can
in confirming when cover was in force. Please can you confirm if there is a contact
number, I can call you or your Mother on and a time that is acceptable so
that I can try and help resolve this particular issue for you. I look forward to hearing from you with this
information. Regards, Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM
Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 | M 07469 147743 | http://www.kgminsurance.co.uk/> www.kgminsurance.co.uk | <http://www.canopius.com/> www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 Dear Andrew I will forward this to you within a few days I
will ask the police compound to do a full print out as to all the tickets as
I believe there is a few missing. I do have around 6 of the tickets here when the
vehicles were sized, I also do have court letters, and letters from DVLA,
which I will forward over to you once I have scanned then in so please give
me a few days and I will get file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 521+, Page 12 of 21 back to you with this information as there is a lot of data. The main one at this time I am worried about is the case where the
vehicle was sized due to the police lying and me being found guilty at court
you did have an email on the 30 November 2014 about what was needed and I do
have the court letter showing I was found guilty and about the appeal. This data should have been given under the Subject access request
under the Data Protection Act 1998 I put in, so was wondering what you can do
about this and if you will need a new Subject access request under the Data Protection
Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in so to do a 4th I do not feel I should need
to do. KGM have in fact did not follow the protocol for the Subject access
request under the Data Protection Act 1998 which has been put in 3 times
already to KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information Commissioner’s
Office as I do not see any reason you would have to stop the information, I
have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact guilty of no
insurance. And now say to deal with this you need information from me. I can
understand you want the information for the complaint that has been put in,
but not the information I asked for to show I was in fact I was insured for
an appeal that is ongoing. And in fact, would not have been ongoing if the Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 as I would not have been
found guilty. I would like the data sent to the court as soon as possible in regard
to this so they can look at the facts and see if fact I was insured so there
should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more of my time wasted
going to court. Regards Simon Cordell From: Austin, Andrew mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54 file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 522+, Page 13 of 21 To: ’Lorraine Cordell’ Subject: RE:
MT3574694 Dear Mr Cordell Thank you for your email. My letter dated 22/12/14 requests the following
documentary evidence from you With regards to any losses that may have been
incurred as a result of the above, I confirm as detailed in my previous
letter, I require the following: · Confirmation of the points you raised to the
Financial Ombudsman when you verbally submitted your complaint and
the outcome you are looking to achieve. · Full details of the losses that you have incurred
as a direct result of your complaint and full documentary evidence supporting
this. · Confirmation of dates of any convictions or costs
imposed directly as a result of your complaint, including full documentary
evidence supporting this. Once I receive all of the above, I will be happy
to consider this further. With regards to your subject access request. My
letter of the 9/12/14 advised the following: Following our initial investigations, we note
that you submitted a subject access request to your Broker. Should you wish
to proceed with this, please can you formally request this in writing to our
Data Protection Officer at the address detailed at the foot of the letter
including a cheque payable to KGM Insurance for the sum of 10.00.
Alternatively, you may wish to wait until our full investigations have been
finalised. file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 515+, Page 14 of 21 Can you please confirm how you wish to proceed with that request? Should you not be in receipt of any of the letters I refer to advise
me above, please and I will ensure copies are sent to you immediately. I await your reply Andrew Austin Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14
Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31 To: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: MT3574694 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing due to the complaint I put in. I have forwarded emails to
Broadsure Direct and spoken to Broadsure Direct who took the policy of
insurance out policy no: MT3574694 I have been asking for information from KGM since 2013 and have heard
nothing back. When the policy was taken out there was some reason it did not show up
on the MID database Broadsure Direct and KGM was aware of this. Due to this fact I had my vehicles were sized a number of times I
believe 8 or 9 times in all, where I had to pay the costs to get my vehicles
out the compound each time. In the week when I was pulled by police it was
not so file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 523+, Page 15 of 21 bad as the insurance company was opened so when I
showed the police my policy, they could call the insurance company. The seizers happened mostly at the weekend mostly
due to the insurance company being closed and the police could not talk to
anyone even when I had my policy on me at all times to prove I did in fact
have insurance. I made many calls to the police, Broadsure
Direct, KGM and the people who run the MID database, but the issue did not go
away, and my vehicles still did not show up on the MID database. There was also a time in Nov 2013 when my van was
sized this was due to KGM telling the police I was not insured due to the
police telling KGM that I had tools in my van. Which was a lie by the police
as I did not have anything in my van. Kelly Tiller from the trade section was
dealing with this and a few days later I got a letter from KGM saying they
was going to cancel my policy. As you can understand I was very upset over
this as I had done nothing wrong. At this time lots of calls was both made to KMG
and Broadsure to stop the cancelation of my insurance policy, I spoke to
Kelly Tiller many times, but she believed the police and I had no say in the
matter. The police were off duty so I could not speak to them and Kelly
Tiller was saying unless I could prove I did not have any tools in my van
then the insurance policy would be cancelled which was very unfair as I had
done nothing wrong, I knew I never had any tools. But I also asked Kelly Tiller did the police tell
her what tools was meant to be in my van, to which she said no. KGM was not
even aware I had mechanics trade on my policy so if my mechanics tools had
been in my van at the time my insurance would still have been cancelled which
to me what was the point in having insurance? I then spoke to a wonderful operator at the
police when I called told her what had gone on and was told by her to go to
the police compound as when any vehicles are taken there, they have to do a
full list of items that are in the vehicles as they are in fact legible if
something goes missing. Over that weekend I sent emails to the compound and
forwarded them to Broadsure as my insurance was due to be cancelled on the
Monday. On Monday I got an email from Broadsure direct asking me to go to the
compound as Kelly Tiller had no luck getting a reply from them also, and once
there to call Kelly Tiller due to the time on the Monday I got the email it
would have been too late to go the compound and get a call to Kelly Tiller as
she would have file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 524+, Page 16 of 21 ended work for that day so I sent an email saying
I would be going there early the next morning. I went the next day and asked to speak to the
manager of the compound who in fact looked up my van and said nothing was in
there, there was not tools I called Kelly Tiller and the manager of the
compound spoke to her and confirmed there was nothing in the van when it was
taken there by police and that I had put thing in the van when I had taken it
out of the compound. At this point Kelly tiller believed me and said
the policy would not be cancelled. But on my way back from the compound
driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and it was Broadsure direct
saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was very upset at this and told
them what had happened, I was asked to hold on they was called KGM back and
would call me right back. I waited till Broadsure direct called me back and
confirmed my insurance policy had not been cancelled then drove home. From this point I have been asking for all
information and putting data protection acts in which have not been dealt
with and I have heard nothing from KGM. I have been back and forward to court due to no
insurance and in fact 4 cases I did not get any summons so was in fact found
guilty as I did not know it was even going to court. I have had points put on my driving licence for
no reason and had to go back and forward to court many times when this should
not have been the case. Then the case come up for the seizer when the police
said I had tools in my van I went to court with all my documents but due to
not having the information I had asked for from KGM many times about that
case I was found guilty. I am very upset about the whole policy with KGM. I
have put an appeal in, and this case will be going to crown court I have
again asked for information and again heard nothing. These matters need to be
addressed as I am suffering due to all of this. Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows
everything that has gone on as he was my main contact. file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 525+, Page 17 of 21 I also have all the emails the last one that I
will enclose again, which I have heard nothing about and the 1st Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the
26/11/2013. I did in fact send the Subject access request under the Data
Protection Act 1998 about time times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into
why I had heard nothing about more than once. Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I
will ask the court to summon the people at KGM to deal with this matter as
they know I was insurance and did nothing wrong and the police lied. All I
have asked for is the data so there will be no need to summons people this
way I can send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown and the
other information and this case should be dropped against me. It just seemed that KGM does not want to do
anything and give me the information I need to prove in fact I was insurance
and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it that I was not insurance. There is a lot more I could say about the
insurance I had with KGM, but this insurance policy was my worst nightmare.
It has messed my clean driving licence up and in fact got to the point I
could not drive so could not work. Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the
information over that was needed to prove I did have insurance. If you need o can send over all the emails that
has been sent back and forward to Broadsure who sent them to KGM. I have lost a lot of money, and time due to this
insurance policy I have had to pay for my vehicles to be taken out of the
police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost of 180.00 to 200.00 a time. All
the loss of work due to having to take time to go to the police compound, and
all the times I have had to go to court for no insurance when in fact I had insurance.
And points put on my driving licence to the fact I could not drive, this has
all been costs to myself. My Mother Lorraine Cordell has also written many
of the emails and is fine with dealing with this issue. file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 526+, Page 18 of 21 Regards Simon Cordell Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 527+, Page 19 of 21 received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other
lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of
Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered
in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery
9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius
Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 529+, Page 20 of 21 Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius
Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius
Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius Group,
which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 530+, Page 21 of 21 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius
Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius
Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015 |
||||
|
|
|
07/02/2015 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 451. Josephine Ward Appeal
against conviction for no insurance Regina v / Page Numbers: 1578 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 452. Lorraine Cordell
_Fwd._ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v / Page Numbers: 1579,1580 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
08/02/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 451. Josephine Ward
Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v / Page Numbers: 1578, From: Josephine Ward [josie@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 08 February 2015 19:02 Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court Dear Mr Wood Ø I have been instructed by Mr Simon Paul
Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell to assist in the appeal against conviction
that is due to be heard at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court on 5th March
2015 at 10am. Ø Miss Cordell has played two recordings that
she received from KGM which are pertinent to the appeal but at present as the
telephone recordings have not been produced as an exhibit by KGM they will
not be admissible at court. Can you therefore please write a section 9 statement confirming that:
Yours faithfully MICHAEL CARROLL & CO. 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 452. Lorraine
Cordell _Fwd._ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v / Page Numbers: 1579,1580, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 08 February 2015 19:46 To: 'Wood, Peter' Subject: FW: Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown
Court Dear Peter Ø We have had to have a meeting today with a
solicitor re the appeal case for my son. Ø The reason for this is due to something about
chain of evidence and submitting the tapes as exhibits to the court I think
that was why the CPS and judge said to us last time we were in court we would
need a section 9 witness statement. Ø please can you address the email from Josephine
Ward from MICHAEL CARROLL & CO
that has been sent to you I have forwarded it below. Ø This court appeal is a lot harder than I had
ever dreamed. Regards Lorraine From: Josephine Ward Mail To:josie@michaelcarrollandco.com Sent: 08 February 2015 19:02 Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Mr Wood Ø
I have been instructed by Mr
Simon Paul Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell to assist in the appeal against
conviction that is due to be heard at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court on 5th
March 2015 at 10am. Ø
Miss Cordell has played two recordings
that she received from KGM which are pertinent to the appeal but at present
as the telephone recordings have not been produced as an exhibit by KGM they
will not be admissible at court. Can you therefore please write
a section 9 statement confirming that:
1580,
Yours faithfully MICHAEL CARROLL & CO. |
||||
|
61. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 61 Peter.Wood@canopius.com_02.09.2015_RE Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Reg 09/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 510 511,512,513,514 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 02 Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1581 Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brixton
Case / Met Police! 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 453. Wood, Peter
_Re_ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v / Page Numbers: 1582,1583 Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brixton
Case / Met Police! |
09/02/2015 |
11:30:00 |
X5 510 511,512,513,514 |
|
|
61. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 61 Peter.Wood@canopius.com_02.09.2015_RE Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Reg 09/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 510 511,512,513,514 -- 510, From: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Sent: 09 February 2015
11:30 To: Josephine Ward Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk; Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Attachments: Witness Statement
060215 S Cordell.docx Dear Ms Ward, Ø
I have drafted a
section 9 statement as requested. Ø
Before I sign it off
can you review it and confirm it satisfies all of your requirements please? Ø
As soon as you do so
I will sign it off, scan a copy over to you and put the original in the post. Ø
Let me know if you
need anything else and of course if you need me to amend the attached in any
way. Lorraine/Andy - FYI. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of
Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close
| London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Josephine Ward mailto: josie@michaelcarroHandco.com Sent: 08 February 2015 19:02 To: Wood, Peter; Austin, Andrew Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Mr Wood Ø
I have been instructed by Mr
Simon Paul Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell to assist in the appeal against
conviction that is due to be heard at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court on 5th
March 2015 at 10am. Ø
Miss Cordell has played two
recordings that she received from KGM which are pertinent to the appeal but
at present as the telephone recordings have not been produced as an exhibit
by KGM they will not be admissible at court. Can you therefore please
write a section 9 statement confirming that:
511,
Yours faithfully MICHAEL CARROLL & CO. Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number
02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One
Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales 512,
513,
514,
END 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 02 Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1581, From: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com on behalf of
Micheal McKee To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Read acknowledgement Date: 09 February 2015 11:27:38 Ø This is a delivery receipt for the mail that
you sent on 06 February 2015 to
"Micheal McKee" <m.mcke@michaelcarrollandco.com> with subject
"Re: Police Complaint". Note: This delivery receipt only acknowledges that the message was displayed
on the recipient’s computer. There is no guarantee that the recipient has
read or understood the message contents. 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 453. Wood, Peter _Re_ Appeal against conviction
for no insurance Regina v / Page Numbers: 1582,1583, From: Wood, Peter [Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 09 February 2015 11:30 To: Josephine Ward Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk; Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Attachments: Witness Statement 060215 S Cordell.docx Dear Ms Ward, Ø
I have drafted a section 9
statement as requested. Before I sign it off can you review it and confirm it
satisfies all of your requirements please? Ø
As soon as you do so I will
sign it off, scan a copy over to you and put the original in the post. Ø
Let me know if you need
anything else and of course if you need me to amend the attached in any way. Lorraine/Andy – FYI. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of
Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Josephine Ward [Mail To:josie@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 08 February 2015 19:02 To: Wood, Peter; Austin, Andrew Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Mr Wood I have been instructed by
Mr Simon Paul Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell to assist in the appeal
against conviction that is due to be heard at Kingston Upon Thames Crown
Court on 5th March 2015 at 10am.
Miss Cordell has played two recordings that she received from KGM which are
pertinent to the appeal but at present as the telephone recordings have not
been produced as an exhibit by KGM they will not be admissible at court. Can
you therefore please write a section 9 statement confirming that: (a) all recording equipment was working correctly (b) KGM produced two recordings at the request of Ms Lorraine Cordell (c) Confirmation that the recording of S Cordell call from police 141113
Recording was provided by KGM from their recorded
calls and is authentic (d) Confirmation that the recording between the Car Pound and Kelly
Tiller was also provided from the KGM recorded calls and is authentic If we
are in possession of a section 9 statement producing the recordings then we
will not have to apply to the court for a Third-Party Summons to compel an
employee from KGM to attend to produce 1583, the recordings. This
would be a complete waste of your time when all we require is a section 9
attesting to the recordings being retrieved from the system and exhibited as
two separate recordings. If you require assistance with drafting a section 9
statement, then we would be happy to draft it and email it over. We would
require the name of the person who retrieved the recordings. the dates that
the recordings were retrieved, the dates the recordings relate to,
confirmation that the recordings were sent to Lorraine Cordell by email so
that she can produce CDs of the recordings so that they can be played in
court and specifically refer to the email containing the recordings so that
there is continuity in the chain of evidence. I deal we would like KGM to
produce the CD's and exhibit them but failing this we will try to get the CPS
to agree the CDs as produced from the email of Miss Cordell. We stress that
the section in relation to the search and retrieval of the KGM database is
essential and critical to ensuring that the chain of evidence is intact. We
can serve these recordings on the CPS and the Court so that they are agreed
in advance of the Appeal hearing. We thank you in advance for your
anticipated cooperation in this matter and hope that we do not have to apply
for a Third-party Witness Summons to compel the attendance of a KGM employee
at the Appeal on the 5th March 2015.
We confirm that Miss Cordell is forwarding an email confirming that we are
instructed and authorised to request this
information. Yours faithfully MICHAEL CARROLL & CO. Confidentiality Caution The information in this
email and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy this message and notify the sender immediately.
Canopius may monitor the content of emails sent and received via its network
for viruses, unauthorised use or other lawful business purposes. Email sent
for and on behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius
Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents
Limited | registered number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential
Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the
Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered
number 02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents
Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor
Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius Managing Agents
Limited Registered office: Gallery
9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales |
||||
|
62. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 62 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.10.2015_RE Simon Cordell
Information 10/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 515,516 517,518,519,520,521,522 523,524,525,526,527,528 529 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 454. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (27) / Page Numbers: 1584 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brent 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 455. GL-BROMLEYMCENQ_RE_ Simon Cordell_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1585,1586 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court – 011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ 5 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 456. GL-BRENTMCENQ_RE_
Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1587 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ 6 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 457. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Information_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1588,1589 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 7 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 458. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell 011401009802 / Page Numbers: 1590 Bromley Court –
011401009802 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 8 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 459. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell _ (2) / Page Numbers: 1591 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! DVLA 9 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 460. Wood, Peter _Re_
Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1592,1593 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 10 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 461. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell 011401009802 / Page Numbers: 1594 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 11 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 462. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1595,1596,1597 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 12 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 463. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell T20130649 / Page Numbers: 1598 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Woolwich 13 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 464. Woolwich Crn, Enquiries _ RE_ Simon Cordell T20130649 / Page Numbers: 1599 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Woolwich 14 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 465. Sandhu, Herminder _RE_ Simon Cordell T20130649 / Page Numbers: 1600,1601 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Woolwich |
10/02/2015 |
15:33:00 |
X15 515,516 517,518,519,520, 521,522,523,524, 525,526,527,528 529 |
|
|
63. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 63 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.10.2015_RE Simon Cordell 10/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 530,531,532,533,534 535,536 |
10/02/2015 |
13:06:00 |
X7 530,531,532,533, 534,535,536 |
|
|
62. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 62 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.10.2015_RE Simon Cordell
Information 10/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 515,516 517,518,519,520,521,522 523,524,525,526,527,528 529 -- 515, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 10 February 2015
15:33 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Information Attachments: S Cordell 020215.pdf Witness Statement
060215 S Cordell.docx REGINA V. SIMON
CORDELL APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION AT KINGSTON UPON THAMES CROWN COURT
080215.doc. Witness Statement
060215 S Cordell.docx Hi Martin Ø
Just giving you an
update Simon has called to try and speak to you today to make a late payment
on his insurance as he was a day late. Ø
could you please
make sure someone calls us to make the payment? Ø
As for KGM they are
now dealing and addressing the issues, but it took me to start cc my emails
to them to Lloyds. Ø
He has been having
it really hard due to all this insurance with KGM and the courts, and not
being able to drive half the time this policy has been in place due to them
keep revoking his driving licence, until the courts then sort it and put it
back in place. Ø
They have again
revoked his driving licence this is the 3 time. Ø
I have had to get a solicitor
now to help with the cases of no insurance because I seem to be getting
nowhere. Ø
And also, to deal
with the appeal case for the 14/11/2013. Ø
I do have the audio
now from KGM that proves the police officer lied and some letters I will
attach to this email just so you are updated. Ø
I can't send the
audio due to most places will not accept that file type. Ø
So, I have included
the transcript that the solicitor done Ø
Could you please
also address doing your section 9 witness statement about the calls for the 14/11/2013
as the appeal case is due to be heard on the 05/03/2015. Ø
Could you also
please send over a copy of Simon no claims please? Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [mailto:martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 07 January 2015 09:06 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Information Good Morning Lorraine, Ø Apologies
for the lack of contact, Ø I
have been in and out of the office. Ø Have
you received any correspondence from KGM? Ø we
spoke to them prior to Christmas regarding the issues Ø and
they have been looking into the situation Ø and
as far as I am aware, they were going to respond directly. Ø I
look forward to hearing from you. Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 Broadsure direct INSURANCE INTERMEDIARY t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 516, Broadsure Direct - Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax
Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as
soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and
reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our
network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 28 December 2014 23:59 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Information Hello Martin Ø Can you please get back to me with an update as I not heard anything
from KGM about the email I sent over to you on the 30/11/2014 with the
data that would be needed? Ø I also have not heard anything from you about the section 9 witness
statement. Ø Please can you get back to me as soon as possible. Regards Lorraine This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com 517,
End of Picture! 518,
End of Picture! 519,
End of Picture! 520,
End of Picture! 521,
End of Picture! 522, RE: Simon Cordell Information->REGINA V. SIMON CORDELL APPEAL AGAINST
CONVICTION AT KINGSTON UPON THAMES CROWN COURT 080215.doc REGINA V. SIMON CORDELL APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION
IN RELATION TO AN ALLEGATION OF NO INSURANCE AT WIMBLEDON MAGISTRATES COURT
ON 26th NOVEMBER 2014 PARTICULARS OF THE CHARGE - 14th November 2013 at
Brixton Hill Police approached and said enquiries re no
insurance, SC explained problems insurance not showing up on the MOTOR
INSURANCE DATABASE Call made to SC insurance broker Broadshaw.
Police not happy with this. He made phone calls to KGM stating that there were
lots of tools in the vehicle. PC Geoghan Metropolitan Police. Clarify limitation on use MT3574694. S Cordell call from police 141113 Recording Thank you for calling KGM introduction select
correct dept from the following: Thank you for calling KGN accounts department to
speak to an account handler please press 1 Female: Hello KGM PC G: Hi there it is PC Geoghan from the Met Police I need to speak to
someone about a policy of insurance a gentleman claims to have with you Female: Okay if you hold the line, I will pass you through to our underwriting
department Carl KGM: Good afternoon Carl speaking how can I help PC G: Hi there it’s PC Geoghan from the Metropolitan Police I’ve got a
gentleman stopped and he has produced a certificate of insurance from KGM and
I just wanted to clarify some of the limitation on the use. Carl: Okay do you have a policy number PC G: Yeah, I do it’s MT3574694. Carl: It’s a Motor trade policy. Yeah, I might have to forward you to
another Department PC G: Yeah sure Jessica: Hi you have been passed through to Jessica from KGM how I can help PC G: I have a gentleman here who has been stopped with an insurance
certificate issued by KGM. I’ve got a policy number and other details Jessica: Okay I can see that from my screen PC G: Basically, it says motor trade and SDWP and use motor trade purposes-
Looking at vehicle it’s got a load of tools in and they appear to be workmen
doing sort of work odd jobs here and there. Is that something motor trade
would cover? Jessica: No, he just covered for road trade, road risk only and SDWP and would
not cover for any other occupation PC G: Okay right, right. He’s claimed he bought the vehicle today or
yesterday and he’s not able to produce any proof that he has done that 523, Jessica: Rights PC G: Err, does he have to notify you of any vehicles Jessica: When a client purchases a vehicle, they have 14 days to make us aware.
If they didn’t within 14 days, they don’t make us aware then they’re not
covered but anything like this happened we do need proof to show that he had
only had it within the 14 days otherwise it would not cover it we need to
obviously we would not ask for proof normally but say if he has like pulled
over now, we would ask because he could just say he bought it yesterday or a
week ago and we would still cover him. PC G So it definitely does not cover him on the if he literally going
around with tools in the van doing jobs that is not something, he is covered
for Jessica Certainly not PC G: That’s not something he is covered for Jessica: No certainly not PC G Can I just get your name obviously for my notes Name: Jessica Kempton DOB 02.02.1992 Phone: 0208 530 1822 Underwriting Department PC G Thanks very much for your help 22.11.2013 Emails: vrescharlton@met.police.uk at
17.14 hrs - no reply charltondocuments@met.police.uk -
forwarded email of 22.11.2013. This email was sent on 24.11.2013 at 13.33 hrs Email read on 24.11.2013 by Rob.Guy@met.pnn.police.uk read
the email on 24.11.2013 at 17.02 hrs Emailed broker on 25.11.2013 at 10.06 hrs email martinienkins@broadshawdirect.com -
all emails sent to compound forwarded. Spoke to PS complaint made on CAD6768/14NOV/13
Cost of recovering the van £190 Ref: 474782 Details of search of van: KGM recording. (FROM
RECORDING 26_11_2013_11_53_Kelly Tiller Kelly call to compound Thank you for calling KGM introduction hold whilst we connect you to our underwriters Charlton Car pound: Good afternoon James speaking James KMG: Hello James is Kelly there please. Who’s calling please? Charlton Car pound - Car pound Metropolitan police service James KMG: Yeah, one second please. Okay I will just put you through Kelly Tiller - Hello Kelly speaking Gareth: Hello Kelly my name is Gareth, Manager of Charlton Car Pound
Metropolitan Police Service I’m dealing with a Mr Simon Paul Cordell
something about the tools in the back of his vehicle Kelly: Correct yeah 524, Gareth: All I can do is I’ve looked at the seizure notice which would be given
to Paul at the time and any property left was blank so if there were any
tools in the back normally that would be registered as tools in the rear of
the vehicle Kelly: Right okay because we had a call from the police Gareth: Yeah Kelly: He advised that there were tools in the vehicle Gareth: Do you want to speak to him a moment Kelly: Who Sorry Gareth: Paul because I have got him in front of me Kelly: Yeah, that’s fine SC Hello Kelly: Hello SC: You alright Kelly Kelly: Okay what have they given you there SC: They have not given me anything, but he did explain to you on the
phone that threes’ no tools on the vehicle on their CADs and in any case,
they would write that down tools in the vehicle and so forth Kelly: Right okay and has he gives you a printout of this. SC: No, you will have to ask him yourself Kelly: Right can you pass me back to him Gareth: Hello Kelly Kelly: Hello, right okay so if there was any kind of tools in the vehicle it
would be stated on there Gareth: Well yeah what happens on the roadside a police officer will issue a
seizure notice and he will say do you want to take any property out of the
vehicle, normally they take satnavs, wallets, money whatever Kelly: He could have taken the tools out of the vehicle Gareth: Well, I do not know I am not going to comment on that to be perfectly
frank with you all I can do is comment on the paperwork that I see in front
of me Right okay Gareth: And there was nothing left in the vehicle Kelly: At the time of when it come in but obviously Yeah Kelly: He’s had the opportunity to take items out of that vehicle Gareth: But then it would have been mentioned that he had done that and there
is nothing there saying that he had, and it would have also mentioned what
was taken on the seizure notice yeah Kelly: Is there any chance you can forward me a copy of this Gareth: No, we are not allowed to under the Police Act and God knows what
else. All I can confirm is what I have seen on the seizure
notice Kelly: Can you confirm that in an email to me please Gareth: Right, what you do Kelly: I have already emailed yourselves and Right You’ve replied to say you would not have anything
like that on record and I just need you to pop me over an email to say that 525, Gareth: If you go to Charlton car Charlton documents and I can reply from
there because we have firewalls and God knows what else Kelly: So, you don’t use the vcse one of whatever it is called Gareth: No if you do charltondocuments@met.police.uk. What I am going to do I am going to bring up a
copy of this seizure notice just double check that I have done everything
right for you Kelly: Are you a police officer Gareth: No, I work at the compound I am just one of the little plebs Kelly: I have just forwarded you over a copy of the email and the reply that
I got from the vres Charlton@met.pnn.police.co.uk Gareth: What I will do I can only go on what we have got here and I’m just
bringing it up now if you bear with me. I am looking at the copy of Kelly: Is that from a PC Geoghan Gareth: Bear with me at the end of the day it is just a signature Kelly: Oh, alright okay Gareth: All I can say is property left in the vehicle there is nothing in
their Property removed from driver that is blank as well but obviously he did
not remove anything else as that would have been registered Kelly: Yeah Gareth: He would have told the officer there’s tools in there be careful as
they’re part of me trade Kelly: Yeah Gareth: Then that would have been registered they were within there. We take
them out and put them into our property store for safe-keeping and then when
he comes to collect them, they get given back then Kelly: Right okay that fine it is just when we got a call from the officer
when he has Mr Cordell at the roadside, he has advised us that he is carrying
tools in his vehicle Gareth: Well, I can’t comment on that I can only go on the information on that
seizure notice and there was nothing been entered that the gentleman removed
anything or there was anything left. That’s all I can say Kelly: That’s fine no worries so if you can just reply to my email there and
then that will be great. Thanks for your help. Email from Kelly Tiller to compound. Case Number:
011401009802 REQUEST FROM MAGISTRATES COURT VIA EMAIL - smglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Summons’s reply sent in by email on 22nd May 2014
at 14.19 hours with not guilty plea attached 526, Receipt from 23rd May 2014 GL-SWESTERNMCENQ [smglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Phone call from Simon’s mother who confirmed
receipt of the email. Convicted in absence on Application to re-open case
email sent on 11th September 2014 Email acknowledged from the court to 527,
End of Picture! 528,
End of Picture! 529,
End of Picture! 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 454. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (27) / Page Numbers: 1584, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 13:06 To: 'GLBrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Cc: London.MagistratesCentralWest@cps.gsi.gov.uk London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk london.MagistratesNorthEast@cps.gsi.gov.uk glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Attachments: S Cordell 020215.pdf Found Guilty again 26012015.pdf S Cordell Cert.GE_ 20132014.pdf image20140520184559.pdf To whom it may concern: Ø
I am writing this email due to the number
of problems I have been having due to a policy of insurance I had with KGM
insurance which did not show up on the MID database in the week it was fine
as I carried my insurance documents with me at all times and the insurance
company could be called, Ø
but the problems were when the insurance
company was closed as the police could not contact them. Ø
My mum Lorraine Cordell and I have sent
many emails to the courts with my insurance documents, but there have been
cases where I have not had a summons. Ø
So did not know about cases and they have
been heard at court and I was found guilty of no insurance. Ø
I have done statutory declarations at
court including my insurance documents and this still has not corrected
anything. Ø
One of the statutory declarations was again
heard at court on the 26/01/2015 which again I did not know about for
Willesden Magistrates' Court. Ø
But I have sent so many emails to this
court with all documents and asked for them to be checked with the police
officer at court to show I was insured to drive. Ø
This has not been done I have just again
been found guilty due to not getting letters of a court hearing date. Ø
I have now also got a letter of Indemnity
from KGM who I was insured with under policy number MT3574694. 00.01 AM on
the 23/2/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/2/14 when it
lapsed. Ø
Most of the cases are with the KGM policy
you will see the reason as to why in the Letter of Indemnity from KGM. Ø
I also believe there was one case for Covea
Insurance PLC policy number MT10 021608047 it was not showing on the MID
due to the stop was the day after I took the policy out. Ø
Please can any cases be set aside and
reopened and looked into and any other cases that have been heard for no
insurance under these policies of insurance be addressed. Ø
You will in due cause be hearing from my
solicitor, she is trying to address all the cases, but this is taking time. Ø
She has seen all the emails I have sent trying
to address these issues and feels more should have been done as it would have
only taken for the insurance policies to be checked and this would have
stopped a waste of time and money for the courts, and myself at this time she
wants to just appeal all cases to the crown court. Ø
Which would again be a waste of money for
the courts and again, of my time. Ø
But this is having an effect on my life
my driving licence has been revoked 3 times for no insurance, Ø
when in fact I have always had insurance
to drive and would not drive if I did not have insurance. Ø
Please see attached documents Could you
get back to me as soon as possible by way of email, as it does seem there is
an issue with my post and not getting letters that was meant to be sent to
me? Ø
I am taking this up with the royal mail. Regards Simon Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 455.
GL-BROMLEYMCENQ_RE_ Simon Cordell_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1585,1586, From: GLBROMLEYMCENQ [glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 13:09 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Ø
This is an automatically generated
message acknowledging your recent E Mail to the Customer Service Team. Please
note a full reply will only be sent if appropriate. Ø
Please DO NOT re‐submit your
enquiry by E Mail, fax or letter as duplicates create unnecessary paperwork
and delays. CONTACT DETAILS FOR BROMLEY
ADMINISTRATION CENTRE (for Bromley, Bexley and Greenwich Magistrates Courts) as
follows: Telephone: 020 8437 3500 or 020 8437 3585 Gold fax:
0870 324
0223 E Mail: GL‐BromleyMCSummons@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for ongoing summons case
enquiries) GL‐BromleyMCEnq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for all concluded case
enquiries) GL‐BromleyMCList@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for ongoing charge case &
Legal Aid enquiries) SEGroupResultingEnquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for Court result enquiries) Other useful E Mail contacts: GL‐CAO.CORRESPOND@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for all fines enquiries) Enquiries@bromley.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk (for Civil Proceeding
enquiries) Thank you, Customer Service Team This email (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are
not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender
by return email. Internet email is not a secure medium. Any reply to this
message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by email. This
email (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored,
recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking
software may be used, and email content may be read at any time. You have a
responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding
emails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses
by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning 1586, service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications
via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 456.
GL-BRENTMCENQ_RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1587, From: GL-BRENTMCENQ [gl-brentmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 13:10 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Ø
Thank
you for e-mailing the North
West and West London Magistrates' Courts Administration Centre. Ø
Please be aware that it has been received
and will be processed. Polite Request: Please refrain
from also sending your correspondence via post/DX or by fax as this risks the
Court duplicating correspondence that has already been received. Thank you
for your co-operation. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for
the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage
or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a
secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by
someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material
in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the
sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the
Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and
e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure
laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 457. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell
Information_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1588,1589, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 15:33 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Information Attachments: S Cordell 020215.pdf Witness Statement 060215
S Cordell.docx REGINA V. SIMON CORDELL
APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION AT KINGSTON UPON THAMES CROWN COURT 080215.doc Witness Statement 060215
S Cordell.docx Hi Martin Ø Just giving you an
update Simon has called to try and speak to you today to make a late payment
on his insurance as he was a day late. Ø could you please make
sure someone calls us to make the payment? Ø As for KGM they are now
dealing and addressing the issues, but it took me to start cc my emails to
them to Lloyds. Ø He has been having it
really hard due to all this insurance with KGM and the courts, and not being
able to drive half the time this policy has been in place due to them keep
revoking his driving licence, until the courts then sort it and put it back
in place. Ø They have again revoked
his driving licence this is the 3 time. Ø I have had to get a
solicitor now to help with the cases of no insurance because I seem to be
getting nowhere. Ø And also, to deal with
the appeal case for the 14/11/2013. Ø I do have the audio now
from KGM that proves the police officer lied and some letters I will attach
to this email just so you are updated. Ø I can't send the audio
due to most places will not accept that file type. Ø So, I have included the
transcript that the solicitor done Ø Could you please also
address doing your section 9 witness statement about the calls for the 14/11/2013
as the appeal case is due to be heard on the 05/03/2015. Ø Could you also please
send over a copy of Simon no claims please? Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To:martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 07 January 2015
09:06 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Information Good Morning Lorraine, Ø Apologies
for the lack of contact, Ø I
have been in and out of the office. Ø Have
you received any correspondence from KGM? Ø we
spoke to them prior to Christmas regarding the issues Ø and
they have been looking into the situation Ø and
as far as I am aware, they were going to respond directly. Ø I
look forward to hearing from you. Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843
598744 cid: image001.png@01CC9FAC. 1589, t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843 594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488. This e-mail transmission
is strictly confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation
to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential
information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy,
distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete
the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the right to,
monitor e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 28 December 2014 23:59 To:
martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Information Hello Martin Ø Can you please get back to me with an update as I not heard anything
from KGM about the email I sent over to you on the 30/11/2014 with the
data that would be needed? Ø I also have not heard anything from you about the section 9 witness
statement. Ø Please can you get back to me as soon as possible. Regards Lorraine 7 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 458. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell 011401009802 / Page Numbers: 1590, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 15:56 To: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell
011401009802 To whom it may concern: Ø
I am writing this email due to a case
that took place on the 26/11/2014 Ø
where I was found guilty of no insurance,
Ø
case ref:
011401009802. Ø
This case was appealed on the date I was
found guilty and is due to be heard on the 05/03/2015 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court. Ø
I am requesting a copy of the transcript
for the trail hearing from Wimbledon Magistrates' Court to aid my appeal at
the crown court. Ø
If there is a fee for this could you,
please reply and let me know the cost. Ø
I am sorry for the delay in asking for
this but would need it before the case of my appeal on the 05/03/2015. Regards Simon Cordell 8 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 459. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell _ (2) / Page Numbers: 1591, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 16:31 To: 'dva.customerservices@doeni.gov.uk' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell To Whom It May Concern: Ref: CORDE801261SP8LV Ø
I
am writing this email due
many problems I have been having been having with my driving licence. Ø
I have made many phone calls asking for
full information to try and clear this mess up and I am not really getting
any joy. Ø
My driving licence has been revoked 3
times due to mistakes at court no insurance. Ø
The issue is with no insurance the time
scale of this would cover the years 2013 to date. Ø
I do need this information as soon as
possible to any cases that are on my licence, and also that have been removed
from my licence by the court within this time scale. Ø
I am addressing these issues but there
are cases I am not aware of which DVLA does hold. Ø
This is why I need this information so I
can contact the courts that need to be contacted. Ø
If there is a fee for this service,
please let me know by return email. Ø I do not
have time to post letters and then have to wait which I am being told on the phone; this is
having a huge effect on my life which maybe you can understand. Ø Please could this be addressed as a matter of
urgency? Regards Simon Paul Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981 9 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 460. Wood, Peter
_Re_ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1592,1593, From: Wood, Peter [Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 10 February 2015 16:38 To: Josephine Ward;
Wood, Peter Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk; Austin,
Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown
Court Good Afternoon, Ø
Please can I have your confirmation that
the draft section 9 statement is acceptable asap? Ø
If I do not hear back by 11.30 tomorrow, Ø
I will have to assume it is and sign it
off and send out as I will be in meetings and on holiday after that time. Thanks Pete Wood From: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Date: 9 February 2015 11:29:00
GMT To: Josephine Ward <josie@michaelcarrollandco.com> Cc: Austin, Andrew <Andrew.Austin@canopius.com>,lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Ms Ward, Ø
I have drafted a section 9
statement as requested. Before I sign it off can you review it and confirm it
satisfies all of your requirements please? Ø
As soon as you do so I will
sign it off, scan a copy over to you and put the original in the post. Ø
Let me know if you need
anything else and of course if you need me to amend the attached in any way. Lorraine/Andy – FYI. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of
Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Josephine Ward [Mail To:josie@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 08 February 2015 19:02 To: Wood, Peter; Austin, Andrew Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Mr Wood Ø
I have been instructed by Mr
Simon Paul Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell to assist in the appeal against
conviction that is due to be heard at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court on 5th
March 2015 Ø
at 10am. 1593, “Forward Info” 10 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 461. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell
011401009802 / Page Numbers: 1594, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 16:40 To: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell 011401009802 To whom it may concern: Ø
I am writing this email due to
a case that took place on the 26/11/2014 Ø
where I was found guilty of no
insurance, Ø
case ref:
011401009802. Ø
This case was appealed on the
date I was found guilty and is due to be heard on the 05/03/2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court. Ø
I am requesting a copy of the
transcript for the trail hearing from Wimbledon Magistrates' Court to aid my
appeal at the crown court. Ø
If there is a fee for this
could you, please reply and let me know the cost. Ø
I am sorry for the delay in
asking for this but would need it before the case of my appeal on the 05/03/2015. Regards Simon Cordell 11 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 462. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1595,1596,1597, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 18:07 To: 'Wood, Peter' Subject: RE: Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown
Court Dear Peter Ø
Sorry for the late reply yes Josephine
Ward has said this is fine and can be signed off. Ø
thank you for all the help in this
matter. Ø
I hope you have a great time on holiday. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 10 February 2015 16:38 To: Josephine Ward; Wood, Peter Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk; Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames
Crown Court Good Afternoon, Ø
Please can I have your
confirmation that the draft section 9 statement is acceptable asap? Ø
If I do not hear back by 11.30
tomorrow, Ø
I will have to assume it is and
sign it off and send out as I will be in meetings and on holiday after that
time. Thanks Pete Wood From: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Date: 9 February 2015 11:29:00
GMT To: Josephine Ward <josie@michaelcarrollandco.com> Cc: Austin, Andrew <Andrew.Austin@canopius.com>,lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Ms Ward, Ø
I have drafted a section 9
statement as requested. Before I sign it off can you review it and confirm it
satisfies all of your requirements please? Ø
As soon as you do so I will
sign it off, scan a copy over to you and put the original in the post. Ø
Let me know if you need anything
else and of course if you need me to amend the attached in any way. Lorraine/Andy – FYI. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager 1596,1597, “Forward Info” 12 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 463. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell T20130649 / Page Numbers: 1598, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 16:08 To: 'enquiries@woolwich.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: Re: Simon Cordell T20130649 To whom it may concern: Ø
I am writing this email re case number T20130649
Simon Paul Cordell Ø
DOB: Ø
I would like to get full transcripts of
the whole case, Ø
could you please tell me how to address
this in order to get this? Ø
and if there would need to be a fee paid
how much this would cost. Ø
Could you please get back to me regards
this via email to this email address? Regards Simon Cordell 13 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 464. Woolwich Crn,
Enquiries _ RE_ Simon Cordell T20130649 / Page Numbers: 1599, From: Woolwich Crn, Enquiries enquiries@woolwich.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 February 2015 16:08 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
T20130649 Thank you for emailing
Woolwich Crown Court. Ø
You have directed your email to the
Enquiries mailbox, and we aim to deal with your enquiry and respond
substantively within the next 5 working days. Ø
Please treat this as a “read receipt” and
refrain from sending this enquiry into the court by Gold fax and hard copy
this causes duplication of work for our admin team. If your enquiry is urgent and
is in relation to tomorrow’s listing, please telephone on 020 8312 5572 This
email (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform
the sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by email. This email (whether you are the sender or the recipient)
may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Email
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content may be read at
any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The original of this email
was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 14 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 465. Sandhu,
Herminder _RE_ Simon Cordell T20130649 / Page Numbers: 1600,1601, From: Sandhu, Herminder herminder.sandhu@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk on behalf of Woolwich Crn, Enquiries enquiries@woolwich.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 February 2015 16:44 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
T20130649 Dear Mr Cordell Ø
Please could you provide us with further
information as to why a full transcript is required. Ø
This application is then referred to the
Judge to seek permission for any information to be disclosed. Ø
The transcribers we use are Merrill Legal
Solutions Ø
(Tel:
0207 404 1400). Ø
They will be able to help you with the
cost which will have to be paid direct to them, but they will require the
Judges permission before any transcript is given. Kind Regards Herminder Sandhu Woolwich Crown Court 2 Belmarsh Road London SE28 OEY DX 117650 Woolwich 7 Tel: 0208 312 7000 enquiries@woolwich.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor
to make representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry of
Justice in any way via electronic means From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 16:08 To: Woolwich Crn, Enquiries Subject: Re: Simon Cordell T20130649 To whom it may concern: Ø
I am writing this email re case
number T20130649 Simon Paul Cordell Ø
DOB:
Ø
I would like to get full
transcripts of the whole case, Ø
could you please tell me how to
address this in order to get this? Ø
and if there would need to be a
fee paid how much this would cost. Ø
Could you please get back to me
regards this via email to this email address? Regards Simon Cordell 1601, This email was scanned by
the Government Secure Intranet antivirus service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of
problems, please call your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the
GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is
not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure
medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone
else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in
response to this message by email. This email (whether you are the sender or
the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content
may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The original
of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 63. Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 63 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.10.2015_RE Simon Cordell 10/02/2015 /
Page Numbers: 530,531,532,533,534 535,536 -- 530, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 10 February 2015 13:06 To: 'GL-BrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Cc: London.magistratescentralwest@cps.gsi.gov.uk London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk london.magistratesnortheast@cps.gsi.gov.uk gl-bromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Attachments: S Cordell 020215.pdf Found Guilty
again 26-01-2015.pdf S Cordell Cert._ GE_ 2013-2014.pdf. image2014-05-20-184559.pdf To whom it may concern: Ø
I am writing this email due to
the number of problems I have been having due to a policy of insurance I had
with KGM insurance which did not show up on the MID database in the week it
was fine as I carried my insurance documents with me at all times and the
insurance company could be called, Ø
but the problems were when the
insurance company was closed as the police could not contact them. Ø
My mum Lorraine Cordell and I
have sent many emails to the courts with my insurance documents, but there
have been cases where I have not had a summons. Ø
So did not know about cases and
they have been heard at court and I was found guilty of no insurance. Ø
I have done statutory
declarations at court including my insurance documents and this still has not
corrected anything. Ø
One of the statutory declarations
was again heard at court on the 26/01/2015 which again I did not know
about for Willesden Magistrates' Court. Ø
But I have sent so many emails
to this court with all documents and asked for them to be checked with the
police officer at court to show I was insured to drive. Ø
This has not been done I have
just again been found guilty due to not getting letters of a court hearing
date. Ø
I have now also got a letter of
Indemnity from KGM who I was insured with under policy number MT3574694.
00.01 AM on the 23/2/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/2/14
when it lapsed. Ø
Most of the cases are with the
KGM policy you will see the reason as to why in the Letter of Indemnity from
KGM. Ø
I also believe there was one
case for Covea Insurance PLC policy number MT10 021608047 it was not
showing on the MID due to the stop was the day after I took the policy out. Ø
Please can any cases be set
aside and reopened and looked into and any other cases that have been heard
for no insurance under these policies of insurance be addressed. Ø
You will in due cause be
hearing from my solicitor, she is trying to address all the cases, but this
is taking time. Ø
She has seen all the emails I
have sent trying to address these issues and feels more should have been done
as it would have only taken for the insurance policies to be checked and this
would have stopped a waste of time and money for the courts, and myself at
this time she wants to just appeal all cases to the crown court. Ø
Which would again be a waste of
money for the courts and again, of my time. Ø
But this is having an effect on
my life my driving licence has been revoked 3 times for no insurance, Ø
when in fact I have always had
insurance to drive and would not drive if I did not have insurance. Ø
Please see attached documents
Could you get back to me as soon as possible by way of email, as it does seem
there is an issue with my post and not getting letters that was meant to be
sent to me? Ø
I am taking this up with the
royal mail. Regards Simon Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981 531, Blank
Page! 532,
End of Picture! 533,
End of Picture! 534,
End of Picture! 535,
End of Picture! 536,
End of Picture! |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
64. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 64 Emma.O’Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk_02.11.2015_FW Simon Cordell 11/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 537,538,539,540 541,542,543,544 1 My 1st Asbo Response Bundle/ pub Book Issue: 1! STATEMENT OF PETER
WOOD KGM INSURANCE/ Page Numbers: 202,203,204 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 466. Wood, Peter _Re_ Appeal
against conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1602,1603,1604,1605 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 467. DVA - Customer
Services _ RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1606 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! DVLA 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 468. Wood, Peter _Re_
Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1607,1608,1609,1610 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 5 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 469. JOSEPHINE WARD
Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court / Page Numbers: 1611 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 6 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 470. London VRR and
complaints _ Your correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Service / Page Numbers: 1612 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! London VRR and Complaints
- Crown Prosecution Service, London 5th Floor Rose Court 2 Southwark Bridge 7 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 471. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1613,1614,1615,1616 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 8 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 472. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1617,1618 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 9 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 473. JOSEPHINE Ward _Re_
Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court / Page Numbers: 1619,1620 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 10 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 474. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1621,1622,1623 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 11 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 475. O'Sullivan Emma _Fwd._ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1624,1625,1626 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! London VRR and Complaints
- Crown Prosecution Service, London 5th Floor Rose Court 2 Southwark Bridge 12 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 476. JOSEPHINE Ward _Re_
Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1627,1628,1629,1630 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 13 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 477. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court / Page Numbers: 1631,1632,1633 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 14 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 478. London VRR and
complaints Your correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Service_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1634 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! London VRR and Complaints
- Crown Prosecution Service, London 5th Floor Rose Court 2 Southwark Bridge |
11/02/2015 |
15:24:00 |
X8 537,538,539,540 541,542,543,544 |
|
|
65. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 65 London VR R and complaints
@cps.gsi.gov.uk_02.11.2015_Thank
you for your email 11/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 545 |
11/02/2015 |
12:01:00 |
X1 545 |
|
|
66. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 66 London VR R and complaints
@cps.gsi.gov.uk_02.11.2015_Your
correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Ser 11/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 546,547 |
11/02/2015 |
16:36:00 |
X2 546,547 |
|
|
67. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 67 London VR R and complaints
@cps.gsi.gov.uk_02.11.2015_Your
correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Ser_001 11/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 548,549 |
11/02/2015 |
11:35:00 |
X2 548,549 |
|
|
68. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 68 Peter.Wood@canopius.com_02.11.2015_RE Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Reg 11/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 550,551,552 553,554,555 |
11/02/2015 |
11:40:00 |
X6 550,551,552 553,554,555 |
|
|
69. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 69 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.11.2015_RE Appeal against
conviction at Kingston Upon Tha_001 11/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 556,557,558 559,560,561 |
11/02/2015 |
14:39:00 |
X6 556,557,558 559,560,561 |
|
|
64. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 64 Emma.O’Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk_02.11.2015_FW Simon Cordell 11/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 537,538,539,540 541,542,543,544 -- 537, From: O'Sullivan Emma <Emma.O'Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk> Sent: 11 February 2015
15:24 To: CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox-.SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk Southcju
(CO16Mailbox-.SouthProsecutionCju@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionCJU@met.pnn.police.uk Cc: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: FW: Simon Cordell Attachments: S Cordell 020215.pdf Found Guilty again
26-01-2015.pdf S Cordell Cert._ GE_
2013-2014.pdf. image2014-05-20-184559.pdf Dear All, Ø Please could you kindly assist
Lorraine Cordell on behalf of her son Simon Cordell. Ø They believe that a number of
summons have been issued against Simon for the offence of no insurance since 2013
due to an error made by the insurance company as per the attached letter.
Ø Unfortunately, due to Simon not
always receiving the summons/adjournment notice they are unsure how many
cases have been issued against him and are trying to get them all reopened
and listed before court to be heard together in light of the above. Ø Please would you be able to check
your database and confirm to the email address below the number of cases with
reference number, court, and conviction date. Ø I have also spoken to her on the
phone and informed Lorraine that she will need to contact the court directly
to make application to reopen/stat decs, which she can only do so once the
information has been obtained. Ø The only matter the cps are
currently aware of is for the case ref J63181495 which is listed for
appeal at Kingston Crown Court 05/03/15. Ø If you are unable to advise her
on summons that have been issued on her son, please could you kindly advise
her where she could obtain the information. Kind Regards, Emma O'Sullivan London Traffic Unit Admin
Line Manager 02033571604 ’ Rose Court, 4th Floor 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, DX 154263 Southwark 12. From: London traffic team
Sent: 10 February 2015
14:41 To: O'Sullivan Emma Subject: FW: Simon Cordell From: London magistrates
central west Sent: 10 February 2015
13:25 To: London traffic team
Subject: FW: Simon Cordell 538, FYI From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Sent: 10 February 2015 13:06 To: GL-BrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Cc: London magistrates central west London magistrates south London magistrate’s northeast gl-bromlevmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell To whom it may concern: Ø
I am writing this email due to
the number of problems I have been having due to a policy of insurance I had
with KGM insurance which did not show up on the MID database in the week it
was fine as I carried my insurance documents with me at all times and the
insurance company could be called, Ø
but the problems were when the
insurance company was closed as the police could not contact them. Ø
My mum Lorraine Cordell and I
have sent many emails to the courts with my insurance documents, but there
have been cases where I have not had a summons. Ø
So did not know about cases and
they have been heard at court and I was found guilty of no insurance. Ø
I have done statutory
declarations at court including my insurance documents and this still has not
corrected anything. Ø
One of the statutory
declarations was again heard at court on the 26/01/2015 which again I
did not know about for Willesden Magistrates' Court. Ø
But I have sent so many emails
to this court with all documents and asked for them to be checked with the
police officer at court to show I was insured to drive. Ø
This has not been done I have just
again been found guilty due to not getting letters of a court hearing date. Ø
I have now also got a letter of
Indemnity from KGM who I was insured with under policy number MT3574694.
00.01 AM on the 23/2/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/2/14
when it lapsed. Ø
Most of the cases are with the
KGM policy you will see the reason as to why in the Letter of Indemnity from
KGM. Ø
I also believe there was one
case for Covea Insurance PLC policy number MT10 021608047 it was not
showing on the MID due to the stop was the day after I took the policy out. Ø
Please can any cases be set
aside and reopened and looked into and any other cases that have been heard
for no insurance under these policies of insurance be addressed. Ø
You will in due cause be
hearing from my solicitor, she is trying to address all the cases, but this
is taking time. Ø
She has seen all the emails I
have sent trying to address these issues and feels more should have been done
as it would have only taken for the insurance policies to be checked and this
would have stopped a waste of time and money for the courts, and myself at
this time she wants to just appeal all cases to the crown court. Ø
Which would again be a waste of
money for the courts and again, of my time. Ø
But this is having an effect on
my life my driving licence has been revoked 3 times for no insurance, Ø
when in fact I have always had
insurance to drive and would not drive if I did not have insurance. Ø
Please see attached documents
Could you get back to me as soon as possible by way of email, as it does seem
there is an issue with my post and not getting letters that was meant to be
sent to me? Ø
I am taking this up with the
royal mail. Regards Simon Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981 539, This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
Security cloud service. For more information, please visit http://www.svmanteccloud.com *********************************************************************+ This e-mail is private and is intended only for
the addressee and any copy recipients. If you are not an intended recipient,
please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message
and any attachments without retaining a copy. Activity and use of CPS Connect systems, the
Government Secure Intranet, and the Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to
secure their effective operation and for other lawful business purposes.
Communications using these systems will also be monitored and may be recorded
to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. ********************************************************************* 540, Documents! 541, Documents! 542, Documents! 543, Documents! 544, Documents! END 1 My 1st Asbo Response
Bundle/ pub Book Issue: 1! STATEMENT OF PETER
WOOD KGM INSURANCE/ Page Numbers: 202,203,204 Witness Statement
of: Peter Wood Ø
Occupation:
Operations Manager, Motor Underwriting Department Ø
This
page consists of two pages and signed by me. Ø It is true to the best of my knowledge and
belief and I make it knowing that, if it is tendered evidence, I shall be
liable to prosecution if I
have wilfully stated anything in it that I know to be false, or do not
believe to be true. Ø Date: Ø I work for
KGM Motor Insurance, an Insurance Company based in London. Ø I am an
Operations Manager working for UK Specialty, Canopius. KGM is a member of the
Canopius Group in the UK Specialty Division. Ø I am responsible
for managing the timely and accurate processing of all client records
supplied to us via our Broker network. Ø Josephine
Ward of Michael Carroll & Co (with Simon & Lorraine Cordell’s
permission) contacted me on the 8/2/2015 requesting a statement in
respect of relevant recorded calls supplied plus a Letter of indemnity
pertaining to Mr Simone Cordell’s policy number MT3574694. Ø
I understand the statement request is
connected to an appeal against conviction for no insurance, Regina v. Simon
Paul Cordell to be heard on the 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown
Court. Ø
I
would confirm that -
KGM Motor Insurance
KGM House 14 Eastwood Close South Woodford London E18 1RZ UK T +44 (0)20 8530
7351 F +44 (0)20 8530
8547 T +44 (0)844 412
6412 Claims F +44 (0)20 8530
7037 Claims www.kgminsurance.co.uk Registered in
England and Wales No 01514453 Registered Office Gallery 9 One Lime Street
London EC3M 7HA KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name tor business written by
Syndicate 260 which is managed by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Authorised
by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority 203, KGM Ø
I
have become involved in this matter following receipt of a Data Subject
Access request and a complaint letter from Simon and Lorraine Cordell. Ø
During
the course of my investigations to establish all the facts before responding
to the letter of complaint it has been necessary for me to obtain and listen
to various phone calls between the client and Underwriters, the Broker and
Underwriters, Underwriters and the Police compound and the original call from
the officer at the roadside and Underwriters. Ø
I
feel I have now reached a good understanding of the sequence of events and as
a result have provided both a Letter of Indemnity and 2 relevant call
recordings to Lorraine and Simon Cordell to support their appeal. Ø
Josephine
Ward has requested that in addition to this I provide a section 9 statement
and confirm the following points -
Ø These 2 calls specifically are -
Signature: Ø
If
I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Ø
These
notes/documents were created or received by a person in the course of trade,
business, profession or other occupation, or as the holder of a paid or
unpaid office and the information contained in the notes/documents was
supplied by a person (whether or not the maker of the statement) who had, or
may reasonably be supposed to have had, personal knowledge of the matters
dealt with and where the information contained in the notes/documents was
supplied directly or indirectly each person through whom it was supplied
received it in the course of a trade, business, profession or other
occupation, or as the holder of a paid or unpaid office and the person who
made the statement cannot reasonably be expected (having regard to the time
which has elapsed since he made the statement and to all the circumstances)
to have any recollection of the matters dealt with in the statement. Signature: Signature witnessed
by: KGM Motor Insurance
KGM House 14 Eastwood Close South Woodford London E18 1RZ UK T +44 (0)20 8530
7351 F +44 (0)20 8530
8547 T +44 (0)844 412
6412 Claims F +44 (0)20 8530
7037 Claims www.kgminsurance.co.uk Registered in
England and Wales No 01514453 Registered Office Gallery 9 One Lime Street
London EC3M 7HA KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by
Syndicate 260 which is managed by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Authorised
by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority 204 KGM data electronically
or when manually inputting data and was something we were unaware of until
this case. We have of course changed our processes to prevent this occurring
again. The unfortunate
outcome for Mr Cordell of course was that it appeared to the Police that he was
driving uninsured and was subjected to unnecessary Police stops. This was not
Mr Cordell’s fault in any way as he had a valid Insurance policy in force and
was fully insured to drive these vehicles for the purposes permitted under
this policy during the policy period. We trust this
letter meets the requirements of the Police and the Courts. Should you
require any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact us. Yours sincerely, Mr Peter Wood UK Specialty
Operations Manager T
+44 (0)20 8530 7351 F
+44 (0)20 8530 8547 T +44 (0)844 412
6412 Claims F +44(0)20 8530
7037 Claims KGM Motor Insurance KGM House 14
Eastwood Close South Woodford London E18 1RZ UK Registered in
England and Wale s N o 01514453 Reg stored Office
Gallery 9 One Lime Street London EC3M 7 HA KGM Motor Insurance
is a brand name for business written by Syndicate 260 which is managed by
Canopius Managing Agents Limited Authorised by the
Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 466. Wood, Peter
_Re_ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1602,1603,1604,1605, From: Wood, Peter [] Sent: 11 February 2015 09:10 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown
Court Thanks Lorraine Ø
I can’t wait, flying tomorrow and 3 weeks
in Oz, Perth, outback and Sydney, family time should be great. Ø OK, I will
sign the statement off this morning and e‐mail and post it, I really
hope it’s enough to get the matter quashed, good luck and no doubt we will communicate when I get back. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius
Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 18:07 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown
Court Dear Peter Ø
Sorry for the late reply yes
Josephine Ward has said this is fine and can be signed off. Ø
thank you for all the help in
this matter. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
holiday. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 10 February 2015 16:38 To: Josephine Ward; Wood, Peter Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk; Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames
Crown Court Good Afternoon, Ø
Please can I have your
confirmation that the draft section 9 statement is acceptable asap? Ø
If I do not hear back by 11.30
tomorrow, Ø
I will have to assume it is and
sign it off and send out as I will be in meetings and on holiday after that
time. Thanks Pete Wood From:
Wood,
Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> 1603,1604,1605, “Forward Info” 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 467. DVA - Customer
Services _ RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1606, From: DVA Customer Services DVA.CustomerServices@doeni.gov.uk Sent: 11 February 2015 09:41 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Sir, Ø
Thank you for your email received 11
February. Ø
Unfortunately, you have contacted the DVA in Northern Ireland and we are
unable to address the issue of your email. Ø
You should contact DVLA Swansea, and it is they who
deal with driver licensing issues in the GB mainland. Ø You can
contact them via the below link: Ø https://www.gov.uk/contact‐the‐dvla Ø I hope you find this of help. Kind regards Linda O’Kane DVA Customer Services From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 16:31 To: DVA Customer Services Subject: Re: Simon Cordell To Whom It May Concern: Ref: CORDE801261SP8LV Ø
I am writing this email due
many problems I have been having been having with my driving licence. Ø
I have made many phone calls
asking for full information to try and clear this mess up and I am not really
getting any joy. Ø
My driving licence has been revoked
3 times due to mistakes at court no insurance. Ø
The issue is with no insurance
the time scale of this would cover the years 2013 to date. Ø
I do need this information as
soon as possible to any cases that are on my licence, and also that have been
removed from my licence by the court within this time scale. Ø
I am addressing these issues
but there are cases I am not aware of which DVLA does hold. Ø
This is why I need this
information so I can contact the courts that need to be contacted. Ø
If there is a fee for this
service, please let me know by return email. Ø
I do not have time to post
letters and then have to wait which I am being told on the phone; this is
having a huge effect on my life which maybe you can understand. Ø
Please could this be addressed as
a matter of urgency? Regards Simon Paul Cordell DOB: 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 468. Wood, Peter
_Re_ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1607,1608,1609,1610, From: Wood, Peter [Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 11 February 2015 11:40 To: Lorraine Cordell;
Josephine Ward (josie@michaelcarrollandco.com) Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court Attachments: S Cordell statement.pdf Hello, Ø
Please find attached signed statement as
requested. Ø
The original is in the post to the
Burncroft Ave address. Ø
If you need anything else please ask Andy
in my absence. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 18:07 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Peter Ø
Sorry for the late reply yes
Josephine Ward has said this is fine and can be signed off. Ø
thank you for all the help in
this matter. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
holiday. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 10 February 2015 16:38 To: Josephine Ward; Wood, Peter Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk; Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Good Afternoon, Ø
Please can I have your
confirmation that the draft section 9 statement is acceptable asap? Ø
If I do not hear back by 11.30
tomorrow, Ø
I will have to assume it is and
sign it off and send out as I will be in meetings and on holiday after that
time. Thanks 1608,1609,1610, 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 469. JOSEPHINE WARD
Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court / Page Numbers: 1611, From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent: 11 February 2015 11:54 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Appeal against
conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Lorraine APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION NO INSURANCE Ø
I need to draft a section 9 statement re
transcribing the recordings onto CD. Ø
I need to draft a section 9 statement for
you also so that you can exhibit them. Ø
I will also need to obtain a copy of the
Legal Adviser's notes re what was recorded as part of PC Geoghan's evidence. Ø
I need to obtain copies of the officer's
pocketbook also. Ø
Can you access your email from my office
in terms of files as emails will have to be printed off? Ø
A bundle will have to be prepared for the
CPS and the Crown Court. Ø
What is your availability 16th or 17th
February 2015? Ø
I am flying home the next two weekends. Ø
I am then on duty quite a lot and will
have murder case papers served so I will be hectically busy. APPEAL AGAINST
CONVICTION / SET ASIDE CONVICTION FOR 26.01.2015 Ø
Again, Lorraine it will take 1 2 hours to
go through this, but I will need access to emails sent and received etc. Ø
I await hearing from you. Regards Josephine 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 470. London VRR and
complaints _ Your correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Service / Page Numbers: 1612, From: London VRR and
complaints [LondonVRRandcomplaints@cps.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 11 February 2015 11:35 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Your correspondence
with the Crown Prosecution Service Attachments: Letter to Mrs
Lorraine Cordell.pdf Dear Ms Cordell, Ø
Please see the attached in regard to your
recent correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Service. Kind regards, T. Pates London VRR and
Complaints Crown Prosecution
Service, London 5th Floor Rose Court 2 Southwark Bridge London SE1 9HS Tel: 0203 357 0000 Email: LondonVRRandComplaints@cps.gsi.gov.uk *********************************************************************+ This email is private and is intended only for the addressee and any
copy recipients. If you are not an intended recipient, please advise the
sender immediately by reply email and delete this message and any attachments
without retaining a copy. Activity and use of CPS Connect systems, the
Government Secure Intranet, and the Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to
secure their effective operation and for other lawful business purposes.
Communications using these systems will also be monitored and may be recorded
to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. ********************************************************************* 7 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 471. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1613,1614,1615,1616, Sent: 11 February 2015 12:45 To: 'Wood, Peter' Subject: RE: Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown
Court Hi Peter Ø
Thank you so much for all your help, and
I hope you have a wonderful holiday. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 11 February 2015 11:40 To: Lorraine Cordell; Josephine Ward (josie@michaelcarrollandco.com) Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Hello, Ø
Please find attached signed
statement as requested. Ø
The original is in the post to
the Burncroft Ave address. Ø
If you need anything else
please ask Andy in my absence. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of
Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 18:07 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Peter Ø
Sorry for the late reply yes
Josephine Ward has said this is fine and can be signed off. Ø
thank you for all the help in
this matter. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
holiday. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent:
10 1614,1615,1616, 8 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 472. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1617,1618, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 11 February 2015 13:24 To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD' Subject: RE: Appeal against
conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Hi Josey 1. APPEAL
AGAINST CONVICTION NO INSURANCE Ø
I think the 17th will be fine just give
me a time. Not sure what you mean below about the CD should I burn a copy off
and bring them with me to the office or do they need to be burned off at the
office. Ø
I can access emails that are being sent
to me from the office if I make sure I close outlook on my computer, Ø
but would have no access to the emails
that are already in outlook as these have been directly downloaded to outlook
from the virgin media server and I have that setup to del once they have been
downloaded. Ø
Is it you who needs to ask for the Legal
Adviser's notes re what was recorded as part of PC Geoghan’s? Ø
evidence and his officer's pocketbook or
me? 2. APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION / SET ASIDE CONVICTION FOR 26.01.2015 Ø
On the 2nd part as I have already taken
my emails to outlook, they are not on a server so the only way to access them
is from my computer. Regards Lorraine From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent: 11 February 2015 11:54 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Lorraine APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION NO INSURANCE Ø
I need to draft a section 9
statement re transcribing the recordings onto CD. Ø
I need to draft a section 9
statement for you also so that you can exhibit them. Ø
I will also need to obtain a
copy of the Legal Adviser's notes re what was recorded as part of PC
Geoghan's evidence. Ø
I need to obtain copies of the
officer's pocketbook also. Ø
Can you access your email from
my office in terms of files as emails will have to be printed off? Ø
A bundle will have to be
prepared for the CPS and the Crown Court. Ø
What is your availability 16th
or 17th February 2015? Ø
I am flying home the next two
weekends. Ø
I am then on duty quite a lot
and will have murder case papers served so I will be hectically busy. APPEAL
AGAINST CONVICTION / SET ASIDE CONVICTION FOR 26.01.2015 Ø
Again, Lorraine it will take 1
2 hours to go through this, but I will need access to emails sent and
received etc. Ø
I await hearing from you. 1618, Regards Josephine 9 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 473. JOSEPHINE Ward
_Re_ Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court / Page Numbers: 1619,1620, Sent: 11 February 2015 13:46 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: Appeal against
conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Lorraine Ø
Can you transfer all from server onto a
USB as this may be the easiest way of accessing the data? Ø
I suggested my office so that everything
can be printed off and put in bundles and scanned and sent in the DX. Re the
discs you can burn off and exhibit, but I will deal with this in your section
9 statement. Ø
I will have to request the data from the
court re the trial notes so all I will need is the date of conviction and the
appeal date and I will send that email off in the next ten minutes. Ø
I need these for two reasons
Ø
I am snowed under at the moment to please
keep Monday appointment if you can and likewise, Ø
I hope that I do not have to rearrange. Ø
Can you confirm with Simon whether he
wants to apply to set aside the conviction which is the correct way to go
about it? Ø
Time runs from date of conviction so 21 days
so lodge appeal against conviction as I believe only a Crown Court Judge can
sort out the licence being revoked. Ø
You also mentioned that there was another
court in East London or South East London can you bring whatever you need
doing on that also. Regards Josephine On Wed, Feb 11, 2015
at 1:24 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Hi Josey 1.
APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION NO INSURANCE Ø
I think the 17th will be fine just
give me a time. Not sure what you mean below about the CD should I burn a
copy off and bring them with me to the office or do they need to be burned
off at the office. Ø
I can access emails that are
being sent to me from the office if I make sure I close outlook on my
computer, Ø
but would have no access to the
emails that are already in outlook as these have been directly downloaded to
outlook from the virgin media server and I have that setup to del once they
have been downloaded. Ø
Is it you who needs to ask for
the Legal Adviser's notes re what was recorded as part of PC Geoghan’s? Ø
evidence and his officer's
pocketbook or me? 2. APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION / SET ASIDE
CONVICTION FOR 26.01.2015 Ø
On the 2nd part as I have
already taken my emails to outlook, they are not on a server so the only way
to access them is from my computer. Regards Lorraine From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent: 11 February 2015 11:54 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Lorraine APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION NO INSURANCE Ø
I need to draft a section 9
statement re transcribing the recordings onto CD. Ø
I need to draft a section 9
statement for you also so that you can exhibit them. Ø
I will also need to obtain a
copy of the Legal Adviser's notes re what was recorded as part of PC
Geoghan's evidence. Ø
I need to obtain copies of the
officer's pocketbook also. Ø
Can you access your email from
my office in terms of files as emails will have to be printed off? Ø
A bundle will have to be
prepared for the CPS and the Crown Court. Ø
What is your availability 16th
or 17th February 2015? Ø
I am flying home the next two
weekends. Ø
I am then on duty quite a lot
and will have murder case papers served so I will be hectically busy. APPEAL
AGAINST CONVICTION / SET ASIDE CONVICTION FOR 26.01.2015 Ø
Again, Lorraine it will take 1
2 hours to go through this, but I will need access to emails sent and
received etc. Ø
I await hearing from you. 1 2 hours to go through
this but I will need access to emails sent and received etc. I await hearing
from you. Regards Josephine 10 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 474. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court_
(1) / Page Numbers: 1621,1622,1623, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 11 February 2015 14:39 To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD' Subject: RE: Appeal against
conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Attachments: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.pdf; S Cordell statement.pdf Hi Josey Ø
The dates of conviction were the 26/11/2014
Wimbledon magistrate’s court. Ø
Appeal date is 05/03/2015 at 10:00
at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court I will try and put emails to something
and bring them to the office do you need all the ones for all the driving
with no insurance of just the ones for the appeal? Ø The
complaints started on the phone to the police on the day this happened which
was the 14/11/2013 Ø
I am sure I have the person’s name here
in my files I will try and find the name of the officer who was dealing with
this matter on the phone calls as she called me back a number of times. Ø
But I wrote to the IPCC on their form
from their website on the 03/12/2013, Ø
I got the reply email for that form on 03/12/2013
at 13:30 please see attached email. Ø
But this will need to be updated now due
to what has happened in this case with the police officer. Ø
Please also see attached Peter Wood
Statement. Ø
I will bring all emails I can what I can
do is export the emails to PDF like the one I have done in the attached from
the IPCC then put them to disc as there is a real lot of emails and in
outlook just saving them does not save them with all details. so, as a rule I
export to PDF. Ø is this ok? Regards Lorraine From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent: 11 February 2015 13:46 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Lorraine Ø
Can you transfer all from
server onto a USB as this may be the easiest way of accessing the data? Ø
I suggested my office so that
everything can be printed off and put in bundles and scanned and sent in the
DX. Re the discs you can burn off and exhibit, but I will deal with this in
your section 9 statement. Ø
I will have to request the data
from the court re the trial notes so all I will need is the date of
conviction and the appeal date and I will send that email off in the next ten
minutes. Ø
I need these for two reasons
Ø
I am snowed under at the moment
to please keep Monday appointment if you can and likewise, Ø
I hope that I do not have to
rearrange. Ø
Can you confirm with Simon
whether he wants to apply to set aside the conviction which is the correct
way to go about it? Ø
Time runs from date of
conviction so 21 days so lodge appeal against conviction as I believe only a
Crown Court Judge can sort out the licence being revoked. 1622, Ø
You also mentioned that there
was another court in East London or South East London can you bring whatever
you need doing on that also. Regards Josephine On Wed, Feb 11, 2015
at 1:24 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Hi Josey 1.
APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION NO INSURANCE Ø
I think the 17th will be fine
just give me a time. Not sure what you mean below about the CD should I burn
a copy off and bring them with me to the office or do they need to be burned
off at the office. Ø
I can access emails that are
being sent to me from the office if I make sure I close outlook on my
computer, Ø
but would have no access to the
emails that are already in outlook as these have been directly downloaded to
outlook from the virgin media server and I have that setup to del once they
have been downloaded. Ø
Is it you who needs to ask for
the Legal Adviser's notes re what was recorded as part of PC Geoghan’s? Ø
evidence and his officer's
pocketbook or me? 2. APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION / SET ASIDE
CONVICTION FOR 26.01.2015 Ø
On the 2nd part as I have
already taken my emails to outlook, they are not on a server so the only way
to access them is from my computer. Regards Lorraine From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent: 11 February 2015 11:54 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Lorraine APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION NO INSURANCE Ø
I need to draft a section 9
statement re transcribing the recordings onto CD. Ø
I need to draft a section 9
statement for you also so that you can exhibit them. Ø
I will also need to obtain a
copy of the Legal Adviser's notes re what was recorded as part of PC
Geoghan's evidence. Ø
I need to obtain copies of the
officer's pocketbook also. Ø
Can you access your email from
my office in terms of files as emails will have to be printed off? Ø
A bundle will have to be
prepared for the CPS and the Crown Court. Ø
What is your availability 16th
or 17th February 2015? Ø
I am flying home the next two weekends.
Ø
I am then on duty quite a lot
and will have murder case papers served so I will be hectically busy. APPEAL
AGAINST CONVICTION / SET ASIDE CONVICTION FOR 26.01.2015 Ø Again,
Lorraine it will take 1 2 hours to go through this, but I will need access to
emails sent and 1623, Ø
received etc. Ø
I await hearing from you. Regards Josephine 11 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 475. O'Sullivan Emma _Fwd._ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1624,1625,1626, From: O'Sullivan Emma [Emma.O'Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 11 February 2015 15:24 To: CO16Mailbox. NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk; CO16Mailbox.SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk Southcju CO16Mailbox.SouthProsecutionCju@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox.NorthProsecutionCJU@met.pnn.police.uk Cc: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: FW: Simon Cordell Attachments: S Cordell 020215.pdf; Found Guilty again
26012015.pdf; S Cordell Cert._ GE_ 20132014.pdf; image20140520184559.pdf Dear All, Ø Please could you kindly
assist Lorraine Cordell on behalf of her son Simon Cordell. Ø They believe that a
number of summons have been issued against Simon for the offence of no
insurance since 2013 due to an error made by the insurance company as
per the attached letter. Ø Unfortunately, due to
Simon not always receiving the summons/adjournment notice they are unsure how
many cases have been issued against him and are trying to get them all
reopened and listed before court to be heard together in light of the above. Ø Please would you be
able to check your database and confirm to the email address below the number
of cases with reference number, court, and conviction date. Ø I have also spoken to
her on the phone and informed Lorraine that she will need to contact the
court directly to make application to reopen/stat decs, which she can only do
so once the information has been obtained. Ø The only matter the cps
are currently aware of is for the case ref J63181495 which is listed
for appeal at Kingston Crown Court 05/03/15. Ø If you are unable to
advise her on summons that have been issued on her son, please could you
kindly advise her where she could obtain the information. Kind Regards, Emma O'Sullivan London Traffic Unit Admin Line Manager 02033571604 Rose Court, 4th Floor 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, DX 154263 Southwark 12. From: London traffic team Sent: 10 February 2015 14:41 To: O'Sullivan Emma Subject: FW: Simon Cordell From: London Magistrates
Central West Sent: 10 February 2015 13:25 To: London traffic team Subject: FW: Simon Cordell 1625, FYI From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 13:06 To: GLBrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Cc: London Magistrates Central West London Magistrates South London Magistrates North
East glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell To whom it may concern: Ø
I am writing this email due to
the number of problems I have been having due to a policy of insurance I had
with KGM insurance which did not show up on the MID database in the week it
was fine as I carried my insurance documents with me at all times and the
insurance company could be called, Ø
but the problems were when the
insurance company was closed as the police could not contact them. Ø
My mum Lorraine Cordell and I
have sent many emails to the courts with my insurance documents, but there
have been cases where I have not had a summons. Ø
So did not know about cases and
they have been heard at court and I was found guilty of no insurance. Ø
I have done statutory
declarations at court including my insurance documents and this still has not
corrected anything. Ø
One of the statutory
declarations was again heard at court on the 26/01/2015 which again I
did not know about for Willesden Magistrates' Court. Ø
But I have sent so many emails
to this court with all documents and asked for them to be checked with the
police officer at court to show I was insured to drive. Ø
This has not been done I have
just again been found guilty due to not getting letters of a court hearing
date. Ø
I have now also got a letter of
Indemnity from KGM who I was insured with under policy number MT3574694.
00.01 AM on the 23/2/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/2/14
when it lapsed. Ø
Most of the cases are with the
KGM policy you will see the reason as to why in the Letter of Indemnity from
KGM. Ø
I also believe there was one
case for Covea Insurance PLC policy number MT10 021608047 it was not
showing on the MID due to the stop was the day after I took the policy out. Ø
Please can any cases be set
aside and reopened and looked into and any other cases that have been heard
for no insurance under these policies of insurance be addressed. Ø
You will in due cause be
hearing from my solicitor, she is trying to address all the cases, but this
is taking time. Ø
She has seen all the emails I
have sent trying to address these issues and feels more should have been done
as it would have only taken for the insurance policies to be checked and this
would have stopped a waste of time and money for the courts, and myself at
this time she wants to just appeal all cases to the crown court. Ø
Which would again be a waste of
money for the courts and again, of my time. Ø
But this is having an effect on
my life my driving licence has been revoked 3 times for no insurance, Ø
when in fact I have always had
insurance to drive and would not drive if I did not have insurance. Ø
Please see attached documents
Could you get back to me as soon as possible by way of email, as it does seem
there is an issue with my post and not getting letters that was meant to be
sent to me? Ø
I am taking this up with the
royal mail. Regards Simon Cordell DOB:
26/01/1981 1626, This email has been
scanned by the Symantec Email Security. Cloud service. For more information,
please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com *********************************************************************+ This email is private and
is intended only for the addressee and any copy recipients. If you are not an
intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply Email and
delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. Activity
and use of CPS Connect systems, the Government Secure Intranet, and the
Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to secure their effective operation
and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using these systems
will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and
for other lawful business purposes. ********************************************************************* 12 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 476. JOSEPHINE Ward
_Re_ Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1627,1628,1629,1630, From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent: 11 February 2015 15:29 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: Appeal against
conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Lorraine Ø
Just focus on this appeal to Kingston
Upon Thames and the appeal against conviction from 26th January 2015. Ø
Can you get Simon to sign this and I will
add the particulars to the appeal together with a chronology? I do not need
the complaint emails yet just straightforward emails to and from court save
to USB. Ø
Also emails to and from Peter Wood save
to USB so I can out together a bundle. Thanks Josephine On Wed, Feb 11, 2015
at 2:38 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Hi Josey Ø
The dates of conviction were
the 26/11/2014 Wimbledon magistrate’s court. Ø
Appeal date is 05/03/2015 at
10:00 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court I will try and put emails to
something and bring them to the office do you need all the ones for all the
driving with no insurance of just the ones for the appeal? Ø The
complaints started on the phone to the police on the day this happened which
was the 14/11/2013 Ø
I am sure I have the person’s
name here in my files I will try and find the name of the officer who was
dealing with this matter on the phone calls as she called me back a number of
times. Ø
But I wrote to the IPCC on
their form from their website on the 03/12/2013, Ø
I got the reply email for that
form on 03/12/2013 at 13:30 please see attached email. Ø
But this will need to be
updated now due to what has happened in this case with the police officer. Ø
Please also see attached Peter
Wood Statement. Ø
I will bring all emails I can
what I can do is export the emails to PDF like the one I have done in the
attached from the IPCC then put them to disc as there is a real lot of emails
and in outlook just saving them does not save them with all details. so, as a
rule I export to PDF. 1628, Regards Lorraine From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent: 11 February 2015 13:46 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Lorraine Ø
Can you transfer all from
server onto a USB as this may be the easiest way of accessing the data? Ø
I suggested my office so that
everything can be printed off and put in bundles and scanned and sent in the
DX. Re the discs you can burn off and exhibit, but I will deal with this in
your section 9 statement. Ø
I will have to request the data
from the court re the trial notes so all I will need is the date of
conviction and the appeal date and I will send that email off in the next ten
minutes. Ø
I need these for two reasons
Ø
I am snowed under at the moment
to please keep Monday appointment if you can and likewise, Ø
I hope that I do not have to
rearrange. Ø
Can you confirm with Simon
whether he wants to apply to set aside the conviction which is the correct
way to go about it? Ø
Time runs from date of
conviction so 21 days so lodge appeal against conviction as I believe only a
Crown Court Judge can sort out the licence being revoked. Ø
You also mentioned that there
was another court in East London or South East London can you bring whatever
you need doing on that also. Regards Josephine On Wed, Feb 11, 2015
at 1:24 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Hi Josey 1.
APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION NO INSURANCE Ø
I think the 17th will be fine
just give me a time. Not sure what you mean below about the CD should I burn
a copy off and bring them with me to the office or do they need to be burned
off at the office. Ø
I can access emails that are
being sent to me from the office if I make sure I close outlook on my
computer, Ø
but would have no access to the
emails that are already in outlook as these have been directly downloaded to
outlook from the virgin media server and I have that setup to del once they
have been downloaded. Ø
Is it you who needs to ask for
the Legal Adviser's notes re what was recorded as part of PC Geoghan’s? Ø
evidence and his officer's
pocketbook or me? 2. APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION / SET ASIDE
CONVICTION FOR 26.01.2015 Ø
On the 2nd part as I have
already taken my emails to outlook, they are not on a server so the only way
to access them is from my computer. Regards Lorraine From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent: 11 February 2015 11:54 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Lorraine APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION NO INSURANCE Ø
I need to draft a section 9
statement re transcribing the recordings onto CD. Ø
I need to draft a section 9
statement for you also so that you can exhibit them. Ø
I will also need to obtain a
copy of the Legal Adviser's notes re what was recorded as part of PC
Geoghan's evidence. Ø
I need to obtain copies of the
officer's pocketbook also. Ø
Can you access your email from
my office in terms of files as emails will have to be printed off? Ø
A bundle will have to be
prepared for the CPS and the Crown Court. Ø
What is your availability 16th
or 17th February 2015? Ø
I am flying home the next two
weekends. Ø
I am then on duty quite a lot
and will have murder case papers served so I will be hectically busy. APPEAL
AGAINST CONVICTION / SET ASIDE CONVICTION FOR 26.01.2015 1630, Ø Again,
Lorraine it will take 1 2 hours to go through this, but I will need access to
emails sent and Ø
received etc. Ø
I await hearing from you. Regards Josephine 13 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 477. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court / Page Numbers: 1631,1632,1633, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 11 February 2015 16:00 To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD' Subject: RE: Appeal against
conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Hi Josey Ø
Ok that's fine, but what does Simon need
to sign Regards Lorraine From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent: 11 February 2015 15:29 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Lorraine Ø
Just focus on this appeal to
Kingston Upon Thames and the appeal against conviction from 26th January
2015. Ø
Can you get Simon to sign this
and I will add the particulars to the appeal together with a chronology? I do
not need the complaint emails yet just straightforward emails to and from
court save to USB. Ø
Also emails to and from Peter
Wood save to USB so I can out together a bundle. Thanks Josephine On Wed, Feb 11, 2015
at 2:38 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Hi Josey Ø
The dates of conviction were
the 26/11/2014 Wimbledon magistrate’s court. Ø
Appeal date is 05/03/2015 at
10:00 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court I will try and put emails to
something and bring them to the office do you need all the ones for all the
driving with no insurance of just the ones for the appeal? Ø The
complaints started on the phone to the police on the day this happened which
was the 14/11/2013 Ø
I am sure I have the person’s
name here in my files I will try and find the name of the officer who was
dealing with this matter on the phone calls as she called me back a number of
times. Ø
But I wrote to the IPCC on
their form from their website on the 03/12/2013, Ø
I got the reply email for that
form on 03/12/2013 at 13:30 please see attached email. Ø
But this will need to be
updated now due to what has happened in this case with the police officer. Ø
Please also see attached Peter
Wood Statement. Ø
I will bring all emails I can
what I can do is export the emails to PDF like the one I have done in the
attached from the IPCC then put them to disc as there is a real lot of emails
and in outlook just saving them does not save them with all details. so, as a
rule I export to PDF. Regards Lorraine 1632, From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent: 11 February 2015 13:46 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Lorraine Ø
Can you transfer all from
server onto a USB as this may be the easiest way of accessing the data? Ø
I suggested my office so that
everything can be printed off and put in bundles and scanned and sent in the
DX. Re the discs you can burn off and exhibit, but I will deal with this in
your section 9 statement. Ø
I will have to request the data
from the court re the trial notes so all I will need is the date of
conviction and the appeal date and I will send that email off in the next ten
minutes. Ø
I need these for two reasons
Ø
I am snowed under at the moment
to please keep Monday appointment if you can and likewise, Ø
I hope that I do not have to
rearrange. Ø
Can you confirm with Simon
whether he wants to apply to set aside the conviction which is the correct
way to go about it? Ø
Time runs from date of
conviction so 21 days so lodge appeal against conviction as I believe only a
Crown Court Judge can sort out the licence being revoked. Ø
You also mentioned that there
was another court in East London or South East London can you bring whatever
you need doing on that also. Regards Josephine On Wed, Feb 11, 2015
at 1:24 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Hi Josey 1.
APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION NO INSURANCE Ø
I think the 17th will be fine
just give me a time. Not sure what you mean below about the CD should I burn
a copy off and bring them with me to the office or do they need to be burned
off at the office. Ø
I can access emails that are
being sent to me from the office if I make sure I close outlook on my
computer, Ø
but would have no access to the
emails that are already in outlook as these have been directly downloaded to
outlook from the virgin media server and I have that setup to del once they
have been downloaded. Ø
Is it you who needs to ask for
the Legal Adviser's notes re what was recorded as part of PC Geoghan’s? Ø
evidence and his officer's
pocketbook or me? 2. APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION / SET ASIDE
CONVICTION FOR 26.01.2015 Ø
On the 2nd part as I have already
taken my emails to outlook, they are not on a server so the only way to
access them is from my computer. Regards Lorraine 1633, From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com] Sent: 11 February 2015 11:54 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Lorraine APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION NO INSURANCE Ø
I need to draft a section 9 statement
re transcribing the recordings onto CD. Ø
I need to draft a section 9
statement for you also so that you can exhibit them. Ø
I will also need to obtain a
copy of the Legal Adviser's notes re what was recorded as part of PC
Geoghan's evidence. Ø
I need to obtain copies of the
officer's pocketbook also. Ø
Can you access your email from
my office in terms of files as emails will have to be printed off? Ø
A bundle will have to be
prepared for the CPS and the Crown Court. Ø
What is your availability 16th
or 17th February 2015? Ø
I am flying home the next two
weekends. Ø
I am then on duty quite a lot
and will have murder case papers served so I will be hectically busy. APPEAL
AGAINST CONVICTION / SET ASIDE CONVICTION FOR 26.01.2015 Ø Again,
Lorraine it will take 1 2 hours to go through this, but I will need access to
emails sent and Ø
received etc. Ø
I await hearing from you. Regards Josephine 14 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 478. London VRR and complaints_ Your correspondence
with the Crown Prosecution Service_ (1) /
Page Numbers: 1634 From: London VRR and complaints [LondonVRRandcomplaints@cps.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 11 February 2015 16:36 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Your correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Service Attachments: Letter to Mr Simon Cordell.pdf Dear Ms Cordell, Ø
Please see the attached in
regard to your recent correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Service. Kind regards, T. Pates London VRR and Complaints Crown Prosecution Service, London 5th Floor Rose Court 2 Southwark Bridge London SE1 9HS Tel: 0203 357 0000 Email: LondonVRRandComplaints@cps.gsi.gov.uk *********************************************************************+ This email is private and
is intended only for the addressee and any copy recipients. If you are not an
intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply email and
delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. Activity
and use of CPS Connect systems, the Government Secure Intranet, and the
Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to secure their effective operation
and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using these systems
will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and
for other lawful business purposes. ********************************************************************* 65. Additional Email
Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 65 London VR R and complaints
@cps.gsi.gov.uk_02.11.2015_Thank
you for your email 11/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 545 -- 545, From: London VR R and
complaints London VR R and complaints
@cps.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 11 February 2015
12:01 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Thank you for your
email Dear Recipient, Ø
Thank you for your
email to CPS London. Ø If your e-mail concerns a request for review under the Victims' Right to Review scheme Ø This is a formal acknowledgment
that we have received your request. Ø We will provide a response within
10 working days and, in the meantime, Ø we will contact you if there is anything
we need to clarify or if we need any additional information. Ø If your email is a complaint
against the CPS Ø This is a formal acknowledgement
that your complaint has been received. Ø We will provide a full response
to your complaint within 20 working days. Ø If we are unable to respond
within this timescale, we will contact you to advise when a response will be
received. Ø We will contact you either by
email or phone if there is anything we need to clarify or if we need any
additional information. Ø If your email provides positive
or negative feedback Ø This is a formal acknowledgement
that we have received your positive or negative feedback, and a reply may be
given where required. Ø All feedback received is logged
and analysed in order to identify service improvements. Ø The CPS is committed to
delivering excellent service standards and will utilise public feedback to
identify and develop good practice. Ø We thank you for taking the time
to write to us. Please find below a link to the Feedback and Complaints Guidance: http://www.cps.gov.uk/contact/feedback_and_complaints/complaints_guidance_english.pdf This e-mail is private and is intended only
for the addressee and any copy recipients. If you are not an intended recipient, please advise the sender
immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments
without retaining a copy. Activity and use of CPS Connect systems, the Government Secure Intranet, and
the Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to secure their effective
operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using these
systems will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective
operation and for other lawful business purposes. 66. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 66 London VR R and complaints
@cps.gsi.gov.uk_02.11.2015_Your
correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Ser 11/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 546,547 -- 546, From: London VR R and complaints London VR R and complaints @cps.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 11 February 2015 16:36 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Your correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Service Attachments: Letter
to Mr Simon Cordell.pdf Dear Ms Cordell, Ø
Please see the attached in
regard to your recent correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Service. Kind regards, T. Pates London VRR and Complaints Crown Prosecution Service, London 5th Floor Rose Court 2 Southwark Bridge London SE1 9HS Tel: 0203 357 0000 Email: London VR R and complaints
@cps.asi.aov.uk *********************************************************************+ This e-mail is private and is intended only for the addressee and any
copy recipients. If you are not an intended recipient, please advise the
sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any
attachments without retaining a copy. Activity and use of CPS Connect systems, the Government Secure
Intranet, and the Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to secure their
effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications
using these systems will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure
effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. ********************************************************************* 547, CPS Your correspondence with the
Crown Prosecution Service->Letter to Mr Simon Cordell.pdf Mr Simon Cordell 11
February 2015 Dear Mr Cordell Thank you for your email of 11 February 2015. I have looked on our Case Management System and note that the Appeal
hearing in respect of a driving with no insurance against Simon Cordell is
fixed for 5 March 2015 at Kingston Crown Court. As stated in my letter to Ms Lorraine Cordell, please forward a copy
of the letter from your insurers as proof that you were insured to drive at
the relevant time in order for me to review the case. Please retain any original insurance documents and only send copies
marked for my attention to the address below. Yours sincerely Ms Yetunde Martins Head of the CPS London Appeals and Committals for sentence Team Crown Prosecution Service 3rd Floor Drummond Gate Pimlico London SW1V 2QZ Early Guilty Plea London Team Third Floor One Drummond Gate Pimlico London SW1V 2QZ DX: 161330 Victoria 19 Email: EGP.London@cps.gsi.gov.uk 67. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 67 London VR R and complaints
@cps.gsi.gov.uk_02.11.2015_Your
correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Ser_001 11/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 548,549 -- 548, From: London VR R and complaints London VR R and complaints @cps.gsi.gov.uk> Sent: 11 February 2015 11:35 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Your correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Service Attachments: Letter to Mrs Lorraine Cordell.pdf Dear Ms Cordell, Ø
Please see the attached in
regard to your recent correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Service. Kind regards, T. Pates London VRR and Complaints Crown Prosecution Service, London 5th Floor Rose Court 2 Southwark Bridge London SE1 9HS Tel: 0203 357 0000 Email: London VR R and complaints
@cps.asi.aov.uk Web: www.cps.gov.uk/London *********************************************************************+ This e-mail is private and is intended only for the addressee and any
copy recipients. If you are not an intended recipient, please advise the
sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any
attachments without retaining a copy. Activity and use of CPS Connect systems, the Government Secure
Intranet, and the Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to secure their
effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications
using these systems will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure
effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. ********************************************************************* 549, CPS Your correspondence with the
Crown Prosecution Service->Letter to Mrs Lorraine Cordell.pdf Mrs Lorraine Cordell 10 February 2015 Dear Mrs Cordell Ø Thank you for your email of 31
January 2015, sent to our complaints team in relation to a case in which you
were the defendant at Wimbledon Magistrates Court. Ø I am the Legal Manager
responsible for the team which deals with all appeals Magistrates Court to
the Crown Court. Ø I have looked through our Case
Management System and cannot find any case of driving with no insurance in
which Lorraine Cordell is the defendant. Ø I would be grateful if you can
provide me with further details to assist me in identifying the case to which
you refer. Ø Please also forward to me a copy
of the letter from your insurers as proof that you were insured to drive at
the relevant time. Ø
Please retain any original insurance documents and only send copies marked for my attention to the
address below. Yours sincerely Ms Yetunde Martins Head of the CPS London Appeals and Committals for
sentence Team Crown Prosecution Service 3rd Floor Drummond Gate Pimlico London SW1V 2QZ Early Guilty Plea London Team Third Floor One Drummond Gate
Pimlico London SW1V 2QZ DX: 161330 Victoria 19 Email: EGP.London@cps.gsi.gov.uk 68. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 68 Peter.Wood@canopius.com_02.11.2015_RE Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Reg 11/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 550,551,552 553,554,555 -- 550, From: Wood, Peter Sent: 11 February 2015 11:40 To: Lorraine Cordell; Josephine Ward josie@michaelcarrollandco.com Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Attachments: S Cordell statement.pdf Hello, Ø
Please find attached signed
statement as requested. Ø
The original is in the post to
the Burncroft Ave address. Ø
If you need anything else
please ask Andy in my absence. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 10 February 2015 18:07 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no
insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court Dear Peter Ø
Sorry for the late reply yes
Josephine Ward has said this is fine and can be signed off. Ø
thank you for all the help in
this matter. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
holiday. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter mailto: Peter.Wood@canopius.com Sent: 10 February 2015 16:38 To: Josephine Ward; Wood, Peter Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk; Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Good Afternoon, Ø
Please can I have your
confirmation that the draft section 9 statement is acceptable asap? Ø
If I do not hear back by 11.30
tomorrow, Ø
I will have to assume it is and
sign it off and send out as I will be in meetings and on holiday after that
time. Thanks Pete Wood 551, From: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Date: 9 February 2015 11:29:00 GMT To: Josephine Ward Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no
insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court Dear Ms Ward, Ø
I have drafted a section 9
statement as requested. Before I sign it off can you review it and confirm it
satisfies all of your requirements please? Ø
As soon as you do so I will
sign it off, scan a copy over to you and put the original in the post. Ø
Let me know if you need
anything else and of course if you need me to amend the attached in any way. Lorraine/Andy - FYI. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Josephine Ward [mailto:josie@michaelcarroHandco.com] Sent: 08 February 2015 19:02 To: Wood, Peter; Austin, Andrew Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Mr Wood Ø
I have been instructed by Mr Simon
Paul Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell to assist in the appeal against
conviction that is due to be heard at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court on 5th
March 2015 at 10am. Ø
Miss Cordell has played two
recordings that she received from KGM which are pertinent to the appeal but
at present as the telephone recordings have not been produced as an exhibit
by KGM they will not be admissible at court. Can you therefore please
write a section 9 statement confirming that:
552,
Yours faithfully MICHAEL CARROLL & CO. Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any
attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor
the content of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use, or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One
Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments
is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this
message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content
of e-mails sent and received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use,
or other lawful business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member
of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered
number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents 553, Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number
02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business
written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One
Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales 554,
End of Picture! 555,
End of Picture! 69. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 69 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.11.2015_RE Appeal against
conviction at Kingston Upon Tha_001 11/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 556,557,558 559,560,561 -- 556, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 11 February 2015 14:39 To: JOSEPHINE WARD Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Attachments: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.pdf S Cordell statement.pdf Hi Josey Ø
The dates of conviction were
the 26/11/2014 Wimbledon magistrate’s court. Ø
Appeal date is 05/03/2015 at
10:00 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court I will try and put emails to
something and bring them to the office do you need all the ones for all the
driving with no insurance of just the ones for the appeal? Ø The
complaints started on the phone to the police on the day this happened which
was the 14/11/2013 Ø
I am sure I have the person’s name
here in my files I will try and find the name of the officer who was dealing
with this matter on the phone calls as she called me back a number of times. Ø
But I wrote to the IPCC on
their form from their website on the 03/12/2013, Ø
I got the reply email for that
form on 03/12/2013 at 13:30 please see attached email. Ø
But this will need to be
updated now due to what has happened in this case with the police officer. Ø
Please also see attached Peter
Wood Statement. Ø
I will bring all emails I can
what I can do is export the emails to PDF like the one I have done in the
attached from the IPCC then put them to disc as there is a real lot of emails
and in outlook just saving them does not save them with all details. so, as a
rule I export to PDF. Regards Lorraine From: JOSEPHINE WARD mailto: josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com Sent: 11 February 2015 13:46 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court
Lorraine Ø
Can you transfer all from
server onto a USB as this may be the easiest way of accessing the data? Ø
I suggested my office so that
everything can be printed off and put in bundles and scanned and sent in the
DX. Re the discs you can burn off and exhibit, but I will deal with this in
your section 9 statement. Ø
I will have to request the data
from the court re the trial notes so all I will need is the date of
conviction and the appeal date and I will send that email off in the next ten
minutes. Ø
I need these for two reasons
Ø
I am snowed under at the moment
to please keep Monday appointment if you can and likewise, Ø
I hope that I do not have to
rearrange. Ø
Can you confirm with Simon
whether he wants to apply to set aside the conviction which is the correct
way to go about it? Ø
Time runs from date of
conviction so 21 days so lodge appeal against conviction as I believe only a
Crown Court Judge can sort out the licence being revoked. 557, Ø
You also mentioned that there
was another court in East London or South East London can you bring whatever
you need doing on that also. Regards Josephine On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Lorraine
Cordell <lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk> wrote: Hi Josey 1.
APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION NO INSURANCE Ø
I think the 17th will be fine
just give me a time. Not sure what you mean below about the CD should I burn
a copy off and bring them with me to the office or do they need to be burned
off at the office. Ø
I can access emails that are
being sent to me from the office if I make sure I close outlook on my
computer, Ø
but would have no access to the
emails that are already in outlook as these have been directly downloaded to
outlook from the virgin media server and I have that setup to del once they
have been downloaded. Ø
Is it you who needs to ask for
the Legal Adviser's notes re what was recorded as part of PC Geoghan’s? Ø
evidence and his officer's
pocketbook or me? 2. APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION / SET ASIDE
CONVICTION FOR 26.01.2015 Ø
On the 2nd part as I have
already taken my emails to outlook, they are not on a server so the only way
to access them is from my computer. Regards Lorraine From: JOSEPHINE WARD mailto:iosephinewardsolicitor@gmail.coml Sent: 11 February 2015 11:54 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Lorraine APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION NO INSURANCE Ø
I need to draft a section 9
statement re transcribing the recordings onto CD. Ø
I need to draft a section 9
statement for you also so that you can exhibit them. Ø
I will also need to obtain a
copy of the Legal Adviser's notes re what was recorded as part of PC
Geoghan's evidence. Ø
I need to obtain copies of the
officer's pocketbook also. Ø
Can you access your email from
my office in terms of files as emails will have to be printed off? Ø
A bundle will have to be
prepared for the CPS and the Crown Court. Ø
What is your availability 16th
or 17th February 2015? Ø
I am flying home the next two
weekends. Ø
I am then on duty quite a lot
and will have murder case papers served so I will be hectically busy. APPEAL
AGAINST CONVICTION / SET ASIDE CONVICTION FOR 26.01.2015 558, Ø Again,
Lorraine it will take 1 2 hours to go through this, but I will need access to
emails sent and Ø
received etc. Ø
I await hearing from you. Regards Josephine 559, RE: Appeal against conviction at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Re From: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 03 December 2013 13:30 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Complaint form Thank you. Your completed form has been sent to the appropriate authority you
have selected in the complaint form for them to consider. They will be in contact with you directly in due course. Regards, Independent Police Complaints Commission The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified
virus free. Communications via the GSi
may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/35e4ec5458fd4329a943f31b23681c5... 11/02/2015 560,
End of Picture! 561,
End of Picture! |
||||
|
|
|
12/02/2015 |
|
|
|
70. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 70 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.13.2015_RE Simon Cordell
011403134612_001 13/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 562,563,564 565,566,567,568,569,570 571,572,573,574,575,576 577,578 5 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 479. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell 011403134612_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1645,1646 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brent 6 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 480. GL-BRENTMCENQ_RE_
Simon Cordell 011403134612 / Page Numbers: 1647 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brent 7 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 481. Sharon.Burns@met.pnn / Page Numbers: 1648,1649 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brent 8 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 482. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell 011403134612 / Page Numbers: 1650,1651,1652 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brent 9 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 483. Sharon.Burns@met.pnn
_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1653,1654,1655 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brent 10 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 484. GL-HCORNERMCENQ_RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1656 Errors with my Criminal
PNC! HIGHBURY CORNER 11 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 485. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell 011403134612 (2) / Page Numbers: 1657,1658,1659 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 = GL-SWESTERNMCENQ 12 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 215. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (26) / Page Numbers: 498,499,500 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Kingston Crown Court |
13/02/2015 |
11:05:00 |
X17 562,563,564,565, 566,567,568,569, 570,571,572,573, 574,575,576,577, 578 |
|
|
71. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 71 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.13.2015_RE Simon Cordell 13/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 579,580,581 |
13/02/2015 |
14:57:00 |
X3 579,580,581 |
|
|
70. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 70 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.13.2015_RE Simon Cordell
011403134612_001 13/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 562,563,564 565,566,567,568,569,570 571,572,573,574,575,576 577,578 -- 562, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 13 February 2015
11:05 To: GL-BrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Cc: CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox-.SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk Southcju (CO16Mailbox-.SouthProsecutionCju@met.pnn.police.uk) CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionCJU@met.pnn.police.uk London.magistratescentralwest@cps.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
011403134612 Attachments: Found Guilty again
26-01-2015.pdf. S Cordell
020215.pdf. S Cordell Cert._GE_2013-2014.pdf. RE_ urgent Simon
CORDELL 011401596899-01.pdf. RE_ urgent Simon
CORDELL 011401596899.pdf RE_ urgent Simon
CORDELL 011401596899-03.pdf RE_ urgent Simon
CORDELL 011401596899-04.pdf Lorraine Cordell_
RE_ Simon Cordell.pdf Appeal-Notice-Signed.pdf To Whom It May
Concern: Complaint Ø I am writing this email again due to a case being heard at court and
me being found guilty. Ø On the 26/01/2015 Ø Case number: 011403134612, Ø I believe the old case number was
011401596899. Ø I have emailed the court many times due to this case I and in my
emails attached my insurance documents. Ø I Have done a statutory declaration which I included my insurance
documents. Ø I know my file must have had my insurance document within there as it
was included in many emails to the court and asked for my emails and
documents to be put on my file. Ø I had no letters from the court to say a date of a hearing of the 26/01/2015,
I have asked in emails that have been sent for any dates to be also copied
over to me by email, as there does seem to be an issue with my post. Ø My mum Lorraine Cordell and I have asked in many emails and phone calls
to the court for the police officer who checks documents to get him to check
my documents which will confirm I am insured. Ø None of this has been done and again I have been found guilty at court
for no insurance when I was insured to drive. Ø I am making this request to have my case listed in order that I can do
the following.
My name: Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB:
26/01/1981. Address: 109 Burncroft
Av Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ Ø I am including in this email
563,
Ø Could you please get back to me
today by return email to lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Ø as I would like to know what can
be done about this case? Ø I have 21 days to appeal to the
crown court and this date is running out very fast so I am also including the
form so I do not run out of time to appeal to the Crown Court as I feel I
will run out of time in this matter. Ø But feel it would be a waste of
time and money for the court and me to address it this way and take it to
appeal at the crown court. Ø I am not sure what CPS dealt with
this case and I do now that the appeal form needs to be addressed to them
also, Ø So, I have included all that I
know off. Ø If I have not included the right
Email for the CPS who dealt with this case can it be forwarded to them. Or
could you please get back to me by email at lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk and let me know the correct email
address this needs to be sent to. Regards Simon Cordell 564, Document! 565, Document! 566, Document! 567, Document! 568, Document! 569, RE: Simon Cordell
011403134612->RE urgent Simon Cordell596899-1.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 08 October 2014 18:24 To: gl-brentmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: RE: urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899 Attachments: S Cordell Cert._ GE_ 2013-2014.pdf Dear sir or Madam Ø I am writing this email
due to the reply dated the 01/10/2014 I got in the post on 06/10/2014
about the email I sent to you on the 12/09/2014 please see below
email dated 12/09/2014. Ø Above is a picture of
the court processing. Ø I did not know about
this not be there. Ø In the email dated the 12/09/2014,
I asked for my case to be listed in order that I could do the following Ø Application to set
aside the conviction Ø Re-open the case Ø The reason for this is
because I have been wrongfully convicted as I did in fact have insurance. Ø As shown in the
attached file. Ø Please can you list my
case in court so I can put the Application to set aside the conviction,
Re-open the case that I reply where you say I have 21 days to file a
statutory declaration due to me being unaware of court case. I have been
wrongfully convicted and have points on my licence, which should file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/a37e51b1bbcc4e63a3e87e6ea4d... 31/01/2015 570,571,572,573,574,575,576,577,578, END 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 479. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell
011403134612_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1645,1646, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 13 February 2015 11:05 To: 'GLBrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Cc: 'CO16Mailbox. NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk'; 'CO16Mailbox. SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk Southcju CO16Mailbox.SouthProsecutionCju@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox.NorthProsecutionCJU@met.pnn.police.uk London.MagistratesCentralWest@cps.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 011403134612 Attachments: Found Guilty again 26012015.pdf; S Cordell 020215.pdf;
S Cordell Cert._ GE_ 20132014.pdf; RE_ urgent Simon CORDELL
01140159689901.pdf; RE_ urgent Simon
CORDELL01140159689902.pdf; RE_ urgent Simon CORDELL
01140159689903.pdf; RE_ urgent Simon CORDELL
01140159689904.pdf; Lorraine Cordell _RE_
Simon Cordell.pdf; Appeal Notice Signed.pdf To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø
I am
writing this email again due to a case being heard at court and me being
found guilty. Ø
On
the 26/01/2015 Ø
Case
number: 011403134612, Ø
I
believe the old case number was 011401596899. Ø
I
have emailed the court many times due to this case I and in my emails
attached my insurance documents. Ø
I
Have done a statutory declaration which I included my insurance documents. Ø
I know
my file must have had my insurance document within there as it was included
in many emails to the court and asked for my emails and documents to be put
on my file. Ø
I
had no letters from the court to say a date of a hearing of the 26/01/2015,
I have asked in emails that have been sent for any dates to be also copied
over to me by email, as there does seem to be an issue with my post. Ø
My
mum Lorraine Cordell and I have asked in many emails and phone calls to the
court for the police officer who checks documents to get him to check my
documents which will confirm I am insured. Ø
None
of this has been done and again I have been found guilty at court for no
insurance when I was insured to drive. Ø I am making this request to have my case listed
in order that I can do the following.
My name: Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981. Address: 109 Burncroft Av Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ Ø I am including in this email
1646, Ø Could you please get
back to me today by return email to lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Ø as I would like to know
what can be done about this case? Ø I have 21 days to
appeal to the crown court and this date is running out very fast so I am also
including the form so I do not run out of time to appeal to the Crown Court
as I feel I will run out of time in this matter. Ø But feel it would be a
waste of time and money for the court and me to address it this way and take
it to appeal at the crown court. Ø I am not sure what CPS dealt
with this case and I do now that the appeal form needs to be addressed to
them also, Ø So, I have included all
that I know off. Ø If I have not included
the right Email for the CPS who dealt with this case can it be forwarded to
them. Or could you please get back to me by email at lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk and let me know the
correct email address this needs to be sent to. Regards Simon Cordell 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 480.
GL-BRENTMCENQ_RE_ Simon Cordell 011403134612 / Page Numbers: 1647, From: GLBRENTMCENQ [glbrentmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 13 February 2015 11:06 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 011403134612 Ø
Thank you for emailing the North West and
West London Magistrates' Courts Administration Centre. Please be aware that
it has been received and will be processed. Polite Request: Please refrain
from also sending your correspondence via post/DX or by fax as this risks the
Court duplicating correspondence that has already been received. Thank you
for your cooperation. This email (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not
the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by
return email. Internet email is not a secure medium. Any reply to this
message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by
email. This email (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring
/ blocking software may be used, and email content may be read at any time.
You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or
forwarding emails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned
for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied
by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 7 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 481.
Sharon.Burns@met.pnn / Page Numbers: 1648,1649, From: Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk on behalf of CO16Mailbox. NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 13 February 2015 12:41 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
011403134612 From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 13 February 2015 11:05 To: GLBrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Cc: CO16 Mail box North Prosecution FPN; CO16Mailbox.SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk CO16MailboxSouth
Prosecution CJU CO16 Mailbox North
Prosecution CJU London.MagistratesCentralWest@cps.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 011403134612 To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø
I am
writing this email again due to a case being heard at court and me being
found guilty. Ø
On
the 26/01/2015 Ø
Case
number: 011403134612, Ø
I
believe the old case number was 011401596899. Ø
I have
emailed the court many times due to this case I and in my emails attached my
insurance documents. Ø
I
Have done a statutory declaration which I included my insurance documents. Ø
I
know my file must have had my insurance document within there as it was included
in many emails to the court and asked for my emails and documents to be put
on my file. Ø
I
had no letters from the court to say a date of a hearing of the 26/01/2015,
I have asked in emails that have been sent for any dates to be also copied
over to me by email, as there does seem to be an issue with my post. Ø
My
mum Lorraine Cordell and I have asked in many emails and phone calls to the
court for the police officer who checks documents to get him to check my
documents which will confirm I am insured. Ø
None
of this has been done and again I have been found guilty at court for no
insurance when I was insured to drive. Ø I am making this request to have my case listed
in order that I can do the following.
My name: Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981. Address: 109 Burncroft Av Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ Ø I am including in this email
1649,
Ø Could you please get
back to me today by return email to lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Ø as I would like to know
what can be done about this case? Ø I have 21 days to
appeal to the crown court and this date is running out very fast so I am also
including the form so I do not run out of time to appeal to the Crown Court
as I feel I will run out of time in this matter. Ø But feel it would be a
waste of time and money for the court and me to address it this way and take
it to appeal at the crown court. Ø I am not sure what CPS
dealt with this case and I do now that the appeal form needs to be addressed
to them also, Ø So, I have included all
that I know off. Ø If I have not included
the right Email for the CPS who dealt with this case can it be forwarded to
them. Or could you please get back to me by email at lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk and let me know the
correct email address this needs to be sent to. Regards Simon Cordell Total Policing is the
Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch
offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working
with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not
print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to
copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify
the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to
conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts
no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter:
@metpolice.uk 8 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 482. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell 011403134612 / Page Numbers: 1650,1651,1652, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 13 February 2015 12:51 To: 'Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
011403134612 Dear Sharon Burns Ø
You sent the below email to me, but it
did not have anything written within it. Ø
it is regarding the email I sent below
was this just to confirm you had got the email. Regards Simon Cordell From: Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk [Mail To: Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk] On Behalf Of CO16Mailbox. NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 13 February 2015 12:41 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
011403134612 From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 13 February 2015 11:05 To: GLBrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Cc: CO16 Mailbox North Prosecution FPN; CO16Mailbox.SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox South
Prosecution CJU; CO16 Mailbox North
Prosecution CJU; London.MagistratesCentralWest@cps.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 011403134612 To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø
I am
writing this email again due to a case being heard at court and me being
found guilty. Ø
On
the 26/01/2015 Ø
Case
number: 011403134612, Ø
I
believe the old case number was 011401596899. Ø
I
have emailed the court many times due to this case I and in my emails
attached my insurance documents. Ø
I
Have done a statutory declaration which I included my insurance documents. Ø
I
know my file must have had my insurance document within there as it was
included in many emails to the court and asked for my emails and documents to
be put on my file. Ø
I
had no letters from the court to say a date of a hearing of the 26/01/2015,
I have asked in emails that have been sent for any dates to be also copied
over to me by email, as there does seem to be an issue with my post. Ø
My
mum Lorraine Cordell and I have asked in many emails and phone calls to the
court for the police officer who checks documents to get him to check my
documents which will confirm I am insured. Ø
None
of this has been done and again I have been found guilty at court for no
insurance when I was insured to drive. Ø I am making this request to have my case listed
in order that I can do the following.
My name: Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981. Address: 109 Burncroft Av Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ Ø I am including in this email
Ø Could you please get
back to me today by return email to lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Ø as I would like to know
what can be done about this case? Ø I have 21 days to
appeal to the crown court and this date is running out very fast so I am also
including the form so I do not run out of time to appeal to the Crown Court
as I feel I will run out of time in this matter. Ø But feel it would be a
waste of time and money for the court and me to address it this way and take
it to appeal at the crown court. Ø I am not sure what CPS
dealt with this case and I do now that the appeal form needs to be addressed
to them also, Ø So, I have included all
that I know off. Ø If I have not included
the right Email for the CPS who dealt with this case can it be forwarded to
them. Or could you please get back to me by email at lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk and let me know the
correct email address this needs to be sent to. 1651,1652, 9 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 483. Sharon. Burns
@met.pnn_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1653,1654,1655, From: Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk on behalf of CO16Mailbox. NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 13 February 2015 12:52 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
011403134612 Simon, Ø
Can you supply a telephone number for you
to be contacted on or ring 020 7230 1695 after 14.00 and before 15.30 please? Regards, Sharon Burns Manager FPNs North Witness Care and
Prosecutions Services Metropolitan Police Phone: 020 7230 1695 Fax: 020 7230 7497 Email: Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk Met Sec Code: Restricted/Not Protectively
Marked From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 13 February 2015 11:05 To: GLBrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Cc: CO16 Mailbox North Prosecution FPN; CO16Mailbox.SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox South
Prosecution CJU; CO16 Mailbox North
Prosecution CJU; London.MagistratesCentralWest@cps.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 011403134612 To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø
I am
writing this email again due to a case being heard at court and me being
found guilty. Ø
On
the 26/01/2015 Ø
Case
number: 011403134612, Ø
I
believe the old case number was 011401596899. Ø
I have
emailed the court many times due to this case I and in my emails attached my
insurance documents. Ø
I
Have done a statutory declaration which I included my insurance documents. Ø
I
know my file must have had my insurance document within there as it was included
in many emails to the court and asked for my emails and documents to be put
on my file. Ø
I
had no letters from the court to say a date of a hearing of the 26/01/2015,
I have asked in emails that have been sent for any dates to be also copied
over to me by email, as there does seem to be an issue with my post. Ø
My
mum Lorraine Cordell and I have asked in many emails and phone calls to the
court for the police officer who checks documents to get him to check my
documents which will confirm I am insured. Ø
None
of this has been done and again I have been found guilty at court for no
insurance when I was insured to drive. 1654, Ø I am making this request to have my case listed
in order that I can do the following.
My name: Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981. Address: 109 Burncroft Av Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ Ø I am including in this email
Ø Could you please get
back to me today by return email to lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Ø as I would like to know
what can be done about this case? Ø I have 21 days to
appeal to the crown court and this date is running out very fast so I am also
including the form so I do not run out of time to appeal to the Crown Court
as I feel I will run out of time in this matter. Ø But feel it would be a
waste of time and money for the court and me to address it this way and take
it to appeal at the crown court. Ø I am not sure what CPS
dealt with this case and I do now that the appeal form needs to be addressed
to them also, Ø So, I have included all
that I know off. Ø If I have not included
the right Email for the CPS who dealt with this case can it be forwarded to
them. Or could you please get back to me by email at lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk and let me know the
correct email address this needs to be sent to. Regards Simon Cordell Total Policing is the
Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch
offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working
with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not
print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright
and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you
must not distribute or copy the information in this email without the
permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the
extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be
read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude
any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no
responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those 1655, of the Metropolitan
Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter:
@metpolice.uk 10 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 484.
GL-HCORNERMCENQ_RE_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1656, From: GLHCORNERMCENQ [glhcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 13 February 2015 13:50 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Ø
Thank you for your email. Ø
Please be aware that it has been received
and will be processed. Polite Request: Please refrain from
also sending your correspondence via post/DX or by Fax as this risks the
Court duplicating correspondence that has already been received. Thank you
for your cooperation. This email (and any attachment) is intended only for
the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage
or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is
not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read
by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send
material in response to this message by email. This email (whether you are
the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the
Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and
email content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure
laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 11 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 485. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell 011403134612 (2) / Page Numbers: 1657,1658,1659, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 13 February 2015 13:52 To: 'CO16Mailbox. NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
011403134612 Dear Sharon Burns Ø
Could you please call my mum Lorraine
Cordell on 0208 245 7454 as she knows everything about this matter? Ø
also, and has been helping me with the
emails. Regards From: Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk [Mail To:
Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk] On Behalf Of CO16Mailbox. NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 13 February 2015 12:52 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 011403134612 Simon, Ø
Can you supply a telephone
number for you to be contacted on or ring 020 7230 1695 after 14.00 and
before 15.30 please? Regards, Sharon
Burns Manager FPNs North Witness Care and Prosecutions Services Metropolitan Police Phone: 020 7230 1695 Fax: 020 7230 7497 Email: Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk Met Sec Code: Restricted/Not Protectively Marked From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 13 February 2015 11:05 To: GLBrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Cc: CO16 Mailbox North Prosecution FPN;
CO16Mailbox. SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk;
CO16 Mailbox South Prosecution CJU CO16 Mailbox North
Prosecution CJU;London.MagistratesCentralWest@cps.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 011403134612 To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø
I am
writing this email again due to a case being heard at court and me being
found guilty. Ø
On
the 26/01/2015 Ø
Case
number: 011403134612, Ø
I
believe the old case number was 011401596899. Ø
I
have emailed the court many times due to this case I and in my emails
attached my insurance documents. Ø
I
Have done a statutory declaration which I included my insurance documents. 1658, Ø
I
know my file must have had my insurance document within there as it was included
in many emails to the court and asked for my emails and documents to be put
on my file. Ø
I
had no letters from the court to say a date of a hearing of the 26/01/2015,
I have asked in emails that have been sent for any dates to be also copied
over to me by email, as there does seem to be an issue with my post. Ø
My
mum Lorraine Cordell and I have asked in many emails and phone calls to the
court for the police officer who checks documents to get him to check my
documents which will confirm I am insured. Ø
None
of this has been done and again I have been found guilty at court for no
insurance when I was insured to drive. Ø I am making this request to have my case listed
in order that I can do the following.
My name: Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981. Address: 109 Burncroft Av Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ Ø I am including in this email
Ø Could you please get
back to me today by return email to lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Ø as I would like to know
what can be done about this case? Ø I have 21 days to
appeal to the crown court and this date is running out very fast so I am also
including the form so I do not run out of time to appeal to the Crown Court
as I feel I will run out of time in this matter. Ø But feel it would be a
waste of time and money for the court and me to address it this way and take
it to appeal at the crown court. Ø I am not sure what CPS
dealt with this case and I do now that the appeal form needs to be addressed
to them also, Ø So, I have included all
that I know off. Ø If I have not included
the right Email for the CPS who dealt with this case can it be forwarded to
them. Or could you please get back to me by email at lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk and let me know the
correct email address this needs to be sent to. Regards Simon Cordell Total 1659, Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to
copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify
the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to
conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts
no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk 12 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 215. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (26) / Page Numbers: 498,499,500, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 13 February 2015 14:57 To: 'O'Sullivan Emma' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Emma Ø
Thank you so much for your help in this
matter Ø
I had an email today from Sharon Burns
from the North section Ø
and she has been really helpful. Ø
Once again thank you for the help in this
matter Regards Lorraine Cordell From: O'Sullivan Emma [Mail To:Emma.O'Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 11 February 2015 15:24 To: CO16Mailbox. NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk; CO16Mailbox. SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk Southcju (CO16Mailbox. SouthProsecutionCju@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox. NorthProsecutionCJU@met.pnn.police.uk Cc: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: FW: Simon Cordell Dear All, Ø Please could you kindly
assist Lorraine Cordell on behalf of her son Simon Cordell. Ø They believe that a
number of summons have been issued against Simon for the offence of no
insurance since 2013 due to an error made by the insurance company as
per the attached letter. Ø Unfortunately, due to
Simon not always receiving the summons/adjournment notice they are unsure how
many cases have been issued against him and are trying to get them all
reopened and listed before court to be heard together in light of the above. Ø Please would you be able
to check your database and confirm to the email address below the number of
cases with reference number, court, and conviction date. Ø I have also spoken to
her on the phone and informed Lorraine that she will need to contact the
court directly to make application to reopen/stat decs, which she can only do
so once the information has been obtained. Ø The only matter the cps
are currently aware of is for the case ref J63181495 which is listed
for appeal at Kingston Crown Court 05/03/15. Ø If you are unable to
advise her on summons that have been issued on her son, please could you
kindly advise her where she could obtain the information. Kind Regards, Emma O'Sullivan London Traffic Unit Admin Line Manager 02033571604 Rose Court, 4th Floor 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, DX 154263 Southwark 12. From: London traffic team Sent: 10 February 2015 14:41 499, To: O'Sullivan Emma Subject: FW: Simon Cordell From: London magistrates
central west Sent: 10 February 2015 13:25 To: London traffic team Subject: FW: Simon Cordell FYI From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015 13:06 To: GLBrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Cc: London Magistrates Central West; London Magistrates South;
London Magistrates North East; glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell To whom it may concern: Ø
I am writing this email due to
the number of problems I have been having due to a policy of insurance I had
with KGM insurance which did not show up on the MID database in the week it
was fine as I carried my insurance documents with me at all times and the
insurance company could be called, Ø
but the problems were when the
insurance company was closed as the police could not contact them. Ø
My mum Lorraine Cordell and I
have sent many emails to the courts with my insurance documents, but there
have been cases where I have not had a summons. Ø
So did not know about cases and
they have been heard at court and I was found guilty of no insurance. Ø
I have done statutory
declarations at court including my insurance documents and this still has not
corrected anything. Ø
One of the statutory
declarations was again heard at court on the 26/01/2015 which again I
did not know about for Willesden Magistrates' Court. Ø
But I have sent so many emails
to this court with all documents and asked for them to be checked with the
police officer at court to show I was insured to drive. Ø
This has not been done I have
just again been found guilty due to not getting letters of a court hearing
date. Ø
I have now also got a letter of
Indemnity from KGM who I was insured with under policy number MT3574694.
00.01 AM on the 23/2/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/2/14
when it lapsed. Ø
Most of the cases are with the
KGM policy you will see the reason as to why in the Letter of Indemnity from
KGM. Ø
I also believe there was one case
for Covea Insurance PLC policy number MT10 021608047 it was not
showing on the MID due to the stop was the day after I took the policy out. Ø
Please can any cases be set
aside and reopened and looked into and any other cases that have been heard
for no insurance under these policies of insurance be addressed. Ø
You will in due cause be
hearing from my solicitor, she is trying to address all the cases, but this
is taking time. Ø
She has seen all the emails I
have sent trying to address these issues and feels more should have been done
as it would have only taken for the insurance policies to be checked and this
would have stopped a waste of time and money for the courts, and myself at
this time she wants to just appeal all cases to the crown court. Ø
Which would again be a waste of
money for the courts and again, of my time. Ø
But this is having an effect on
my life my driving licence has been revoked 3 times for no insurance, Ø
when in fact I have always had insurance
to drive and would not drive if I did not have insurance. Ø
Please see attached documents
Could you get back to me as soon as possible by way of email, as it does seem
there is an issue with my post and not getting letters that was meant to be
sent to me? Ø
I am taking this up with the
royal mail. Regards 500, Simon Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981 This email has been
scanned by the Symantec Email Security. Cloud service. For more information,
please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com *********************** This email is private and
is intended only for the addressee and any copy recipients. If you are not an
intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply email and
delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. Activity
and use of CPS Connect systems, the Government Secure Intranet, and the
Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to secure their effective operation
and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using these systems
will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and
for other lawful business purposes. 71. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 71 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.13.2015_RE Simon Cordell 13/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 579,580,581 -- 579, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 13 February 2015 14:57 To: O'Sullivan Emma Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear Emma Ø
Thank you so much for your help
in this matter Ø
I had an email today from
Sharon Burns from the North section Ø
and she has been really
helpful. Ø
Once again thank you for the
help in this matter Regards Lorraine Cordell From: O'Sullivan Emma mailto: Emma.O'Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 11 February 2015 15:24 To: CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox-SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk Southcju (CO16Mailbox-.SouthProsecutionCju@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionCJU@met.pnn.police.uk Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: FW: Simon Cordell Dear All, Ø Please could you kindly
assist Lorraine Cordell on behalf of her son Simon Cordell. Ø They believe that a
number of summons have been issued against Simon for the offence of no
insurance since 2013 due to an error made by the insurance company as
per the attached letter. Ø Unfortunately, due to
Simon not always receiving the summons/adjournment notice they are unsure how
many cases have been issued against him and are trying to get them all reopened
and listed before court to be heard together in light of the above. Ø Please would you be
able to check your database and confirm to the email address below the number
of cases with reference number, court, and conviction date. Ø I have also spoken to
her on the phone and informed Lorraine that she will need to contact the
court directly to make application to reopen/stat decs, which she can only do
so once the information has been obtained. Ø The only matter the cps
are currently aware of is for the case ref J63181495 which is listed
for appeal at Kingston Crown Court 05/03/15. Ø If you are unable to
advise her on summons that have been issued on her son, please could you
kindly advise her where she could obtain the information. Kind Regards, Emma O'Sullivan London Traffic Unit Admin Line Manager 02033571604 Rose Court, 4th Floor 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, DX 154263 Southwark 12. 580, From: London traffic team Sent: 10 February 2015
14:41 To: O'Sullivan Emma Subject: FW: Simon Cordell From: London magistrates
central west Sent: 10 February 2015
13:25 To: London traffic team
Subject: FW: Simon Cordell FYI From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 10 February 2015 13:06 To: GL-BrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Cc: London magistrates central west London magistrates south London magistrate’s northeast gl-bromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell To whom it may concern: Ø
I am writing this email due to
the number of problems I have been having due to a policy of insurance I had
with KGM insurance which did not show up on the MID database in the week it
was fine as I carried my insurance documents with me at all times and the
insurance company could be called, Ø
but the problems were when the
insurance company was closed as the police could not contact them. Ø
My mum Lorraine Cordell and I
have sent many emails to the courts with my insurance documents, but there
have been cases where I have not had a summons. Ø
So did not know about cases and
they have been heard at court and I was found guilty of no insurance. Ø
I have done statutory
declarations at court including my insurance documents and this still has not
corrected anything. Ø
One of the statutory
declarations was again heard at court on the 26/01/2015 which again I
did not know about for Willesden Magistrates' Court. Ø
But I have sent so many emails
to this court with all documents and asked for them to be checked with the
police officer at court to show I was insured to drive. Ø
This has not been done I have
just again been found guilty due to not getting letters of a court hearing
date. Ø
I have now also got a letter of
Indemnity from KGM who I was insured with under policy number MT3574694.
00.01 AM on the 23/2/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/2/14
when it lapsed. Ø
Most of the cases are with the
KGM policy you will see the reason as to why in the Letter of Indemnity from
KGM. Ø
I also believe there was one
case for Covea Insurance PLC policy number MT10 021608047 it was not
showing on the MID due to the stop was the day after I took the policy out. Ø
Please can any cases be set
aside and reopened and looked into and any other cases that have been heard
for no insurance under these policies of insurance be addressed. Ø
You will in due cause be
hearing from my solicitor, she is trying to address all the cases, but this
is taking time. Ø
She has seen all the emails I
have sent trying to address these issues and feels more should have been done
as it would have only taken for the insurance policies to be checked and this
would have stopped a waste of time and money for the courts, and myself at
this time she wants to just appeal all cases to the crown court. Ø
Which would again be a waste of
money for the courts and again, of my time. Ø
But this is having an effect on
my life my driving licence has been revoked 3 times for no insurance, Ø
when in fact I have always had
insurance to drive and would not drive if I did not have insurance. Ø
Please see attached documents
Could you get back to me as soon as possible by way of email, as it does seem
there is an issue with my post and not getting letters that was meant to be
sent to me? Ø
I am taking this up with the
royal mail. 581, Regards Simon Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981 This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security cloud
service. For more information, please visit http://www.svmanteccloud.com *********************************************************************+ This e-mail is private and is intended only for the addressee and any
copy recipients. If you are not an intended recipient, please advise the
sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any
attachments without retaining a copy. Activity and use of CPS Connect systems, the Government Secure
Intranet, and the Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to secure their
effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications
using these systems will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure
effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. ********************************************************************* |
||||
|
|
|
14/02/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/02/2015 |
|
|
|
72. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 72 swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_02.16.2015_Clerks Notes for
Simon Cordell 16/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 582 583,584,585,586 1 My 1st Asbo Response Bundle/ pub Book Issue: 1! EMAIL REQUESTING COURT
NOTE FOR TRIAL IN LAVENDER HILL MAGISTRATES COURT/ Page Numbers: 209 |
16/02/2015 |
09:57:00 |
X5 582 583,584,585,586 |
|
|
72. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 72 swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_02.16.2015_Clerks Notes for
Simon Cordell 16/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 582 583,584,585,586 -- 582, From: GL-SWESTERNMCENQ <swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> Sent: 16 February 2015
09:57 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Clerks Notes for
Simon Cordell Attachments: DOC034.pdf Ø With reference to your e-mail of the 10th February please find
attached clerks notes from the trial on the 26th November as requested. Miss J Lee Ø Administration Officer Lavender Hill Magistrates' Court 176a Lavender
Hill, London, SW11 1JU Tel: 020 7805 1470 *Please note: As of June 2nd,
2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No: 0870 324 0299* 'I am not
authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make
representations or other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in
any way via electronic means. This e-mail (and
any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you
are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the
sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is
not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read
by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send
material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail
(whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and
retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software
may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a
responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding
e-mails and their contents. The original of
this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 583,
End of Picture! 584,
End of Picture! 585,
End of Picture! 586,
End of Picture! 1 My 1st Asbo
Response Bundle/ pub Book Issue: 1! EMAIL REQUESTING
COURT NOTE FOR TRIAL IN LAVENDER HILL MAGISTRATES COURT/ Page Numbers: 209 FW: Clerks Notes for
Simon Cordell https://cmail.land1.co.uk/ox6/ox.html FW: Clerks Notes for
Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell To: 'Micheal McKee m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com Priority: Normal Date: 23/02/2015 13:29 –
Original Message – From: GL-SWESTERNMCENQ mailto: smqlondonmchmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 16 February 2015 09:57 To: lorraine326blucyonder.co.uk Subject: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
With
reference to your e-mail of the 10th February please find attached clerks
notes from the trial on the 26th November as requested. Miss J Lee Ø
Administration
Officer Lavender Hill Magistrates' Court 176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU Miss J Lee Administration Officer Lavender Hill Magistrates’ Court 176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU Tel: 020 7805 1470 ♦Please note’s As of June 2nd 2014
Our fax will be GOLDFAX No: 0870 324 0299* I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their content. 1 of 2 23/02/2015 18:0! |
||||
|
|
|
17/02/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/02/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/02/2015 |
|
|
|
|
There
was a file on the wrong date here |
20/02/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/02/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/02/2015 |
|
|
|
|
4 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: FW Clerks Notes for
Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1679 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Magistrates Court -
176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU 5 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1680 6 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes
for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 283,284 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Magistrates Court -
176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU 7 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes
for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 285,286 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Magistrates Court -
176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU 8 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes
for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 287,288,289 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Magistrates Court -
176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU 9 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1688 10 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes
for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1689,1690,1691 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Magistrates Court -
176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU 11 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes
for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1692,1693,1694 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Magistrates Court -
176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU 12 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes
for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 297,298,299 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Magistrates Court -
176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU 13 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1698 14 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1699 Asbo! 15 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes
for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 302,303,304 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Magistrates Court -
176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU 16 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: Company warehouse / Page Numbers: 1703,1704 Asbo! My Company Too Smooth! 17 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1705 18 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes
for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1706,1707,1708 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Magistrates Court -
176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU 19 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes
for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1709,1710,1711,1712 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Magistrates Court -
176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU |
23/02/2015 |
|
|
|
4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: FW Clerks Notes for
Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1679 From: Lorraine Cordell To: "Micheal McKee" Subject: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Date: 23 February 2015 13:29:00 Attachments: DOC034.pdf Original Message From: GL-SWESTERNMCENQ Mail To: swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 16 February 2015
09:57 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
With
reference to your e-mail of the 10th February please find attached clerks
notes from the trial on the 26th November as requested. Miss J Lee Ø
Administration
Officer Lavender Hill Magistrates' Court 176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU Miss J Lee Administration Officer Lavender Hill Magistrates'
Court 176a Lavender Hill, London,
SW11 1JU Tel: 020 7805 1470 *Please note: As of June 2nd 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No:
0870 324 0299* 'I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of Justice
contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which may bind
the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means'. This e-mail (and
any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are
not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender
by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by
someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material
in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender
or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The
original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1680 From: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com on behalf of
Micheal McKee To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Read acknowledgement Date: 23 February 2015 13:32:11 Ø
This is a delivery receipt for the mail
that you sent on 23 February 2015
to "Micheal McKee" <m.mcke@michaelcarrollandco.com> with subject "FW: Clerks
Notes for Simon Cordell". Note: This delivery receipt only acknowledges that the message was displayed on
the recipient’s computer. There is no guarantee that the recipient has read
or understood the message contents. 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Page Numbers: 1681,1682, 1681, From: Micheal McKee To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Date: 23 February 2015 13:34:06 Ø
I can see that on page 2 it states
"no tools" in the car. On 23 February 2015 at
13:29 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Original Message From: GL-SWESTERNMCENQ [mailto:swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 16 February 2015 09:57 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
With
reference to your e-mail of the 10th February please find attached clerks
notes from the trial on the 26th November as requested. Miss J Lee Administration Officer Lavender Hill
Magistrates' Court 176a Lavender Hill,
London, SW11 1JU Tel: 020 7805 1470 'I am not authorised to
bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or
other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via
electronic means. This e-mail (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are
not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender
by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a
secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by
someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material
in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you
are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by
the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used,
and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to
ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their
contents. The original of this email
was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure 1682, Intranet virus scanning
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via the
GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. 7 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1683,1684, 1683, From: To: Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Date: 23 February 2015 13:46:00 Dear Michael Ø
Yes, it does, say that but I really don't
know how you can read it the writing is horrible to understand lol Ø
I am burning the copies of the CD's when
Simon gets to the office can you please check them that they play I don't
know what format the court uses. Ø
I know Josey also needs these CDs also
for the appeal on the 05/03/2015 at KINGSTON UPON THAMES CROWN COURT,
should I wait to do the 2nd copy to make sure they play at the office I know
they play in my computer CD, Ø
Also, she will need some of the paperwork
Simon will be bringing with him to the office today. Ø
Can you also let me know about the
statement from Moses is that good enough I had to make the format up you made
for Simon statement and send it to him, so he knew how to write it. like the
top section of the statement. if you understand that he is working so finding
it very hard to get down here but will attend court I just have to give him a
few days’ notice to which day he will be needed for. Ø
I am also trying to get hold of the court
to see about the letter for his PNC record to see if any work has been done
on it. Lorraine From: Micheal McKee [mailto:m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015 13:34 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell I can see
that on page 2 it states "no tools" in the car. On 23 February 2015 at
13:29 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: --- Original
Message----------- From: GL-SWESTERNMCENQ [mailto:swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 16 February 2015 09:57 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
With
reference to your e-mail of the 10th February please find attached clerks
notes from the trial on the 26th November as requested. 1684, Miss J Lee Administration
Officer Lavender Hill
Magistrates' Court 176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU Tel: 020 7805 1470 *Please note: As of June
2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No: 0870 324 0299* 'I am not authorised to
bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or
other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via
electronic means. This e-mail (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are
not the intended recipient, please destroy Internet e-mail is not a
secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by
someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material
in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you
are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by
the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used,
and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to
ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their
contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the
Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email
has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 8 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1685,1686,1687, 1685, From: Micheal McKee To: Lorraine, Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Date: 23 February 2015 13:58:00 Ø
It would be ideal if we could have a
letter from Every Decibel Matters Ltd confirming Simon Cordell is not an
employee/shareholder/director or has any controlling interest in the company.
Ø
Can this be arranged? Ø
It would have to be on company
letterhead. On 23 February 2015 at 13:46 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Dear Michael Ø
Yes, it does, say that but I
really don't know how you can read it the writing is horrible to understand
lol Ø
I am burning the copies of the
CD's when Simon gets to the office can you please check them that they play I
don't know what format the court uses. Ø
I know Josey also needs these
CDs also for the appeal on the 05/03/2015 at KINGSTON UPON THAMES
CROWN COURT, should I wait to do the 2nd copy to make sure they play at the
office I know they play in my computer CD, Ø
Also, she will need some of the
paperwork Simon will be bringing with him to the office today. Ø
Can you also let me know about
the statement from Moses is that good enough I had to make the format up you
made for Simon statement and send it to him, so he knew how to write it. like
the top section of the statement. if you understand that he is working so
finding it very hard to get down here but will attend court I just have to
give him a few days’ notice to which day he will be needed for. Ø
I am also trying to get hold of
the court to see about the letter for his PNC record to see if any work has
been done on it. Lorraine From: Micheal McKee [mailto:m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015 13:3 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø I can see
that on page 2 it states "no tools" in the car. On 23 February 2015 at
13:29 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: 1686, To: Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Date: 23 February 2015 13:58:00 Ø
It would be ideal if we could
have a letter from Every Decibel Matters Ltd confirming Simon Cordell is not
an employee/shareholder/director or has any controlling interest in the
company. Ø
Can this be arranged? Ø
It would have to be on company
letterhead. On 23 February 2015 at 13:46 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Dear Michael Ø
Yes, it does, say that but I
really don't know how you can read it the writing is horrible to understand
lol Ø
I am burning the copies of the
CD's when Simon gets to the office can you please check them that they play I
don't know what format the court uses. Ø
I know Josey also needs these
CDs also for the appeal on the 05/03/2015 at KINGSTON UPON THAMES
CROWN COURT, should I wait to do the 2nd copy to make sure they play at the
office I know they play in my computer CD, Ø
Also, she will need some of the
paperwork Simon will be bringing with him to the office today. Ø
Can you also let me know about
the statement from Moses is that good enough I had to make the format up you
made for Simon statement and send it to him, so he knew how to write it. like
the top section of the statement. if you understand that he is working so
finding it very hard to get down here but will attend court I just have to
give him a few days’ notice to which day he will be needed for. Ø
I am also trying to get hold of
the court to see about the letter for his PNC record to see if any work has
been done on it. Lorraine From: Micheal McKee [mailto:m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015 13:34 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell I can see
that on page 2 it states "no tools" in the car. On 23 February 2015 at
13:29 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: --- Original
Message----------- From: GL-SWESTERNMCENQ [mailto:swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 16 February 2015 09:57 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
With
reference to your e-mail of the 10th February please find attached clerks
notes from the trial on the 26th November as requested. Miss J Lee Administration
Officer Lavender Hill Magistrates'
Court 176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU Tel: 020 7805 1470 *Please note: As of June
2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No: 0870 324 0299* 'I am not authorised to
bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other
statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic
means. This e-mail (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are
not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender
by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a
secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by
someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material
in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you
are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by
the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used,
and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to
ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their
contents. The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via the
GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. 9 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1688, From: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com on behalf of
Micheal McKee To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Read acknowledgement Date: 23 February 2015 13:58:16 Ø
This is a delivery receipt for the mail
that you sent on 23 February 2015
to "Micheal McKee" <m.mcke@michaelcarrollandco.com> with subject "RE: FW:
Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell". Note: This delivery receipt only acknowledges that the message was
displayed on the recipient’s computer. There is no guarantee that the
recipient has read or understood the message contents. 10 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes
for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1689,1690,1691, From: Lorraine Cordell To: Micheal McKee Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Date: 23 February 2015 13:59:00 Moses said he sent the letter
back to you the day he got it he called me to say he got the letter and said
he would post back that day, I even talked on the phone to him yesterday and he told me he
had posted it. Regards Lorraine From: Micheal McKee [Mail To: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015 13:58 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
It would be ideal if we could
have a letter from Every Decibel Matters Ltd confirming Simon Cordell is not
an employee/shareholder/director or has any controlling interest in the
company. Ø
Can this be arranged? Ø
It would have to be on company
letterhead. On 23 February 2015 at
13:46 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
Dear Michael Ø
Yes, it does, say that but I
really don't know how you can read it the writing is horrible to understand
lol Ø
I am burning the copies of the
CD's when Simon gets to the office can you please check them that they play I
don't know what format the court uses. Ø
I know Josey also needs these
CDs also for the appeal on the 05/03/2015 at KINGSTON UPON THAMES
CROWN COURT, should I wait to do the 2nd copy to make sure they play at the
office I know they play in my computer CD, Ø
Also, she will need some of the
paperwork Simon will be bringing with him to the office today. Ø
Can you also let me know about
the statement from Moses is that good enough I had to make the format up you
made for Simon statement and send it to him, so he knew how to write it. like
the top section of the statement. if you understand that he is working so
finding it very hard to get down here but will attend court I just have to
give him a few days’ notice to which day he will be needed for. Ø
I am also trying to get hold of
the court to see about the letter for his PNC record to see if any work has
been done on it. Lorraine 1690, From: Micheal McKee [mailto:m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015 13:34 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell I can see
that on page 2 it states "no tools" in the car. On 23 February 2015 at
13:29 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: --- Original
Message----------- From: GL-SWESTERNMCENQ [mailto:swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 16 February 2015 09:57 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
With
reference to your e-mail of the 10th February please find attached clerks
notes from the trial on the 26th November as requested. Miss J Lee Administration Officer Lavender Hill Magistrates' Court 176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU Tel: 020 7805 1470 *Please note:
As of June 2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No: 0870 324 0299* 'I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. This e-mail
(and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s).
Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you
are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the
sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to
this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that
in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by
e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at
any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not 1691, broken when composing or
forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned
for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied
by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. 11 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes
for Simon Cordell /
Page Numbers: 1692,1693,1694, From: Lorraine Cordell To: "Micheal McKee' Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for
Simon Cordell Date: 23 February 2015 14:02:00 Ø
I will see what I can do I ask him if he
can email me a letter over what needs to be said can you write it and email
me it and I will sort it from there via email, From: Micheal McKee [Mail To: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 201513:58 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE:
FW: Clerks Notes for Simon
Cordell Ø
It would be ideal if we could
have a letter from Every Decibel Matters Ltd confirming Simon Cordell is not
an employee/shareholder/director or has any controlling interest in the
company. Ø
Can this be arranged? Ø
It would have to be on company
letterhead. On 23 February 2015 at
13:46 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Dear Michael Ø
Yes, it does, say that but I
really don't know how you can read it the writing is horrible to understand
lol Ø
I am burning the copies of the
CD's when Simon gets to the office can you please check them that they play I
don't know what format the court uses. Ø
I know Josey also needs these
CDs also for the appeal on the 05/03/2015 at KINGSTON UPON THAMES
CROWN COURT, should I wait to do the 2nd copy to make sure they play at the
office I know they play in my computer CD, Ø
Also, she will need some of the
paperwork Simon will be bringing with him to the office today. Ø
Can you also let me know about
the statement from Moses is that good enough I had to make the format up you
made for Simon statement and send it to him, so he knew how to write it. like
the top section of the statement. if you understand that he is working so
finding it very hard to get down here but will attend court I just have to
give him a few days’ notice to which day he will be needed for. Ø
I am also trying to get hold of
the court to see about the letter for his PNC record to see if any work has
been done on it. Lorraine From: Micheal McKee [mailto:m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015 13:34 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell 1693, I can see that on page 2
it states "no tools" in the car. On 23 February 2015 at
13:29 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: --- Original
Message----------- From: GL-SWESTERNMCENQ [mailto:swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 16 February 2015 09:57 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
With
reference to your e-mail of the 10th February please find attached clerks
notes from the trial on the 26th November as requested. Miss J Lee Administration Officer Lavender Hill
Magistrates' Court 176a Lavender Hill,
London, SW11 1JU Tel: 020 7805 1470 *Please note: As of June 2nd, 2014,
our fax will be GOLDFAX No: 0870 324 0299* I am not authorised to
bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or
other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via
electronic means. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the
attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or
copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is
not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read
by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send
material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are
the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the
Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and
e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure
laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been 1694, certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 12 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1695,1696,1697, 1695, From: Micheal McKee To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Date: 23 February 2015 14:02:44 Ø
If he can email the letter, he has
written we can take it from there. On 23 February 2015 at
14:02 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Ø
I will see what I can do I ask
him if he can email me a letter over what needs to be said can you write it
and email me it and I will sort it from there via email, From: Micheal McKee [mailto:m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015 13:58 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
It would be ideal if we could
have a letter from Every Decibel Matters Ltd confirming Simon Cordell is not
an employee/shareholder/director or has any controlling interest in the
company. Ø
Can this be arranged? Ø
It would have to be on company
letterhead. On 23 February 2015 at
13:46 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Dear Michael Ø
Yes, it does, say that but I
really don't know how you can read it the writing is horrible to understand
lol Ø
I am burning the copies of the
CD's when Simon gets to the office can you please check them that they play I
don't know what format the court uses. Ø
I know Josey also needs these
CDs also for the appeal on the 05/03/2015 at KINGSTON UPON THAMES
CROWN COURT, should I wait to do the 2nd copy to make sure they play at the
office I know they play in my computer CD, Ø
Also, she will need some of the
paperwork Simon will be bringing with him to the office today. Ø
Can you also let me know about the
statement from Moses is that good enough I had to make the format up you made
for Simon statement and send it to him, so he knew how to write it. like the
top section of the statement. if you understand that he is working so finding
it very hard to get down here but will attend court I just have to give him a
few days’ notice to which day he will be needed for. Ø
I am also trying to get hold of
the court to see about the letter for his PNC record to see if any work has
been done on it. Lorraine 1696, From: Micheal McKee [mailto:m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015 13:34 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell I can see that on page 2
it states "no tools" in the car. On 23 February 2015 at
13:29 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: --- Original
Message----------- From: GL-SWESTERNMCENQ [mailto:swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 16 February 2015 09:57 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
With
reference to your e-mail of the 10th February please find attached clerks
notes from the trial on the 26th November as requested. Miss J Lee Administration
Officer Lavender Hill
Magistrates' Court 176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU Tel: 020 7805 1470 *Please note: As of June
2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No: 0870 324 0299* 'I am not authorised to bind
the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other
statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic
means. This e-mail (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are
not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender
by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a
secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by
someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material
in response to this message by e-mail. 1697, This e-mail (whether you
are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by
the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used,
and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to
ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their
contents. The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via the
GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. 13 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1698, From: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com on behalf of Micheal
McKee To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Read acknowledgement Date: 23 February 2015 14:03:36 Ø This is a delivery receipt for the mail that
you sent on 23 February 2015 to
"Micheal McKee" <m.mcke@michaelcarrollandco.com> with subject "RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon
Cordell". Note: This delivery receipt only acknowledges that the message was displayed
on the recipient’s computer. There is no guarantee that the recipient has
read or understood the message contents. 14 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1699, From: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com on behalf of Micheal McKee To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Read acknowledgement Date: 23 February 2015 14:03:36 Ø This is a delivery receipt for the mail that
you sent on 23 February 2015 to
"Micheal McKee" <m.mcke@michaelcarrollandco.com> with subject "RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon
Cordell". Note: This delivery receipt only acknowledges that the message was displayed
on the recipient’s computer. There is no guarantee that the recipient has
read or understood the message contents. 15 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1700,1701,1702, 1700, From: Lorraine Cordell To: "Micheal McKee" Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Date: 23 February 2015 14:05:00 Ø
Ok I will ask him but is his witness
statement ok. Lorraine From: Micheal McKee [mailto:m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015 14:03 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
If he can email the letter, he
has written we can take it from there. On 23 February 2015 at
14:02 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Ø
I will see what I can do I ask
him if he can email me a letter over what needs to be said can you write it
and email me it and I will sort it from there via email, From: Micheal McKee [mailto:m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015 13:58 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
It would be ideal if we could
have a letter from Every Decibel Matters Ltd confirming Simon Cordell is not
an employee/shareholder/director or has any controlling interest in the
company. Ø
Can this be arranged? Ø
It would have to be on company
letterhead. On 23 February 2015 at
13:46 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Dear Michael Ø
Yes, it does, say that but I
really don't know how you can read it the writing is horrible to understand
lol Ø
I am burning the copies of the
CD's when Simon gets to the office can you please check them that they play I
don't know what format the court uses. Ø
I know Josey also needs these
CDs also for the appeal on the 05/03/2015 at KINGSTON UPON THAMES
CROWN COURT, should I wait to do the 2nd copy to make sure they play at the
office I know they play in my computer CD, Ø
Also, she will need some of the
paperwork Simon will be bringing with him to the office today. Ø
Can you also let me know about
the statement from Moses is that good enough I had to make the format up you
made for Simon statement and send it to him, so he knew how to write it. like
the top section of the statement. if you understand that he is working so
finding it very hard to get down here but will attend court I just have to
give him a few days’ notice to which day he will be needed for. Ø I
am also trying to get hold of the court to see about the letter for his PNC
record 1701, to see if any work has been done on it. Lorraine From: Micheal McKee [mailto:m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015 13:34 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell I can see that on page 2 it
states "no tools" in the car. On 23 February 2015 at
13:29 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: --- Original
Message----------- From: GL-SWESTERNMCENQ [mailto:swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 16 February 2015 09:57 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
With
reference to your e-mail of the 10th February please find attached clerks
notes from the trial on the 26th November as requested. Miss J Lee Administration
Officer Lavender Hill Magistrates'
Court 176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU Tel: 020 7805 1470 *Please note: As of June
2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No: 0870 324 0299* I am not authorised to bind
the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other
statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic
means. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all 1702, copies and inform the
sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to
this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that
in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by
e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at
any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 16 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: Company warehouse / Page Numbers: 1703,1704, Subject: Order Confirmation From: sales@thecompanywarehouse.co.uk sales@thecompanywarehouse.co.uk Date: Monday, 23 February 2015,
14:12 Order Confirmation Order ID: 140761 Ø
Thank
you for placing your order
with The Company Warehouse. Ø
Please note the order items coloured red
below. Ø
This means we need more information from you
before we can process your order. Ø
In order to provide us with the relevant
information, please log in to My Company Warehouse Item(s) ordered: Too Smooth Ltd Product Qty. Line Total VAT
Total Online Company Formation 1
£5.99 £1.20 £7.19 Government Filing Fee 1 £13.00 £0.00
£13.00 Corporate Compliance Pack 1 £30.30 £6.06 £36.36 LOGIN NOW to take advantage of your FREE 'My Company Warehouse'
control panel. Membership Details: Username: Re_wired@ymail.com Password: B6MJ4DV5 We recommend that you change your password
to something more memorable after your first login. 6 great reasons to login • Print your invoices • Order more products and services from The Company Warehouse • Manage your order (including any products included as part as of a
package) • Download FREE software, products and support packs • Raise support tickets • Request FREE product consultancies Thank you. 1704, The Company Warehouse Team T: 0845 880 2613 +44(0)1245
492 777 support@thecompanywarehouse.co.uk Third Party Formations Limited T/A the Company Warehouse Registered in
England and Wales number: 3994971 | VAT Registration number: 830 8066 39 Attachments • 1.txt (7.28 KB) • Untitled2.gif (968 B) • Untitled3.gif (l1.75 KB) • Untitled4.png (5.11 KB) 17 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: Read
acknowledgement / Page Numbers: 1705, From: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com on behalf of
Micheal McKee To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Read acknowledgement Date: 23 February 2015 14:18:48 Ø
This
is a delivery receipt for
the mail that you sent on 23 February 2015
to "Micheal McKee" <m.mcke@michaelcarrollandco.com> with subject "RE: FW:
Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell". Note: This delivery receipt only acknowledges that the message was
displayed on the recipient’s computer. There is no guarantee that the
recipient has read or understood the message contents. 18 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes
for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1706,1707,1708, 1706, From: Micheal McKee To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for
Simon Cordell Date: 23 February 2015
14:21:09 Ø Yes. Ø I will tidy
it up a bit, Ø but it is
more or less fine. Ø Is Moses
willing to attend court? Ø Can you
send me his phone number? On 23 February 2015 at 14:05 Lorraine
Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Ø
Ok I will ask him but is his
witness statement ok. Lorraine From: Micheal McKee [mailto:m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015 14:03 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
If he can email the letter, he
has written we can take it from there. On 23 February 2015 at
14:02 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Ø
I will see what I can do I ask
him if he can email me a letter over what needs to be said can you write it
and email me it and I will sort it from there via email, From: Micheal McKee mailto: m. McKee @michaelcarrollandco. com Sent: 23 February 2015 13:58 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
It would be ideal if we could
have a letter from Every Decibel Matters Ltd confirming Simon Cordell is not an
employee/shareholder/director or has any controlling interest in the company.
Ø
Can this be arranged? Ø
It would have to be on company
letterhead. On 23 February 2015 at 13:46 Lorraine Cordell
<lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Dear Michael Ø
Yes, it does, say that but I
really don't know how you can read it the writing is horrible to understand
lol Ø
I am burning the copies of the
CD's when Simon gets to the office can you please check them that they play I
don't know what format the court uses. Ø
I know Josey also needs these
CDs also for the appeal on the 05/03/2015 at KINGSTON UPON THAMES
CROWN COURT, should I wait to do the 2nd copy to make sure they play at the
office I know they play in my computer CD, Ø
Also, she will need some of the
paperwork Simon will be bringing with him to the office today. 1707, Ø
Can you also let me know about
the statement from Moses is that good enough I had to make the format up you
made for Simon statement and send it to him, so he knew how to write it. like
the top section of the statement. if you understand that he is working so
finding it very hard to get down here but will attend court I just have to
give him a few days’ notice to which day he will be needed for. Ø I
am also trying to get hold of the court to see about the letter for his PNC
record to see if any work has been done on it. Lorraine From: Micheal McKee [mailto:m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015 13:34 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: Re: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell I can see that on page 2
it states "no tools" in the car. On 23 February 2015 at
13:29 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: --- Original
Message----------- From: GL-SWESTERNMCENQ [mailto:swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 16 February 2015 09:57 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
With
reference to your e-mail of the 10th February please find attached clerks
notes from the trial on the 26th November as requested. Miss J Lee Administration Officer Lavender Hill Magistrates' Court 176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU Tel: 020 7805 1470 *Please note: As
of June 2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No: 0870 324 0299* 1708, 'I am not authorised to
bind the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or
other statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via
electronic means. This e-mail (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are
not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender
by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this
message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by
e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring
/ blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time.
You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or
forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned
for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied
by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.)
This email has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 19 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: RE FW Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1709,1710,1711,1712, From: Lorraine Cordell To: Micheal McKee Subject: RE:
FW: Clerks Notes for Simon
Cordell Date: 23 February 2015
14:28:00 Hi Michael Ø
Yes, Ø
he willing to attend court he
just needs a few days’ notice of the date for court that he will be needed
for, His phone number is on the statement 0743230 Ø
but he is at work right now so
maybe will not pick up. Ø
I have emailed him about the
letter and asked him to email me it. Regards Lorraine From: Micheal McKee [Mail To: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015
14:21 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE:
FW: Clerks Notes for Simon
Cordell Ø Yes.
Ø I
will tidy it up a bit, Ø but
it is more or less fine. Ø Is
Moses willing to attend court? Ø Can
you send me his phone number? On 23 February 2015 at 14:05 Lorraine
Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Ø
Ok I will ask him but is his
witness statement ok. Lorraine From: Micheal McKee [mailto:m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015 14:03 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: FW: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Ø
If he can email the letter, he
has written we can take it from there. On 23 February 2015 at
14:02 Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Ø
I will see what I can do I ask
him if he can email me a letter over what needs to be said can you write it
and email me it and I will sort it from there via email, From: Micheal McKee [Mail To: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com] Sent: 23 February 2015
13:58 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE:
FW: Clerks Notes for Simon
Cordell Ø
It would be ideal if we could
have a letter from Every Decibel Matters Ltd confirming Simon Cordell is not
an employee/shareholder/director or has any controlling interest in the company.
Ø
Can this be arranged? Ø
It would have to be on company
letterhead. 1710,1711,1712, |
||||
|
|
|
24/02/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/02/2015 |
|
|
|
73. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 73 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.26.2015_RE Simon Cordell
Appeal 26/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 587 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 233. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell_ (25) / Page Numbers: 544 Broadsure Insurance! Driving Ban (1)/? 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 486. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Appeal / Page Numbers: 1745 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Willesden Harrow magistrates! 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 487. Harrow Crown, Listing _ RE_ Simon Cordell Appeal / Page Numbers: 1746 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Willesden Harrow magistrates! 5 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 488. GL-BRENTMCENQ_RE_
Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1747 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brent! |
26/02/2015 |
23:28:00 |
X1 587 |
|
|
74. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 74 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.26.2015_RE Simon Cordell
Appeal_001 26/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 588 589,590,591,592,593,594 595,596,597,598 |
26/02/2015 |
22:23:00 |
X11 588 589,590,591,592, 593,594595,596, 597,598 |
|
|
75. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 75 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.26.2015_Re Simon Cordell 26/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 599,600 601,602,603,604,605,606 607 |
26/02/2015 |
22:31:00 |
X9 599,600 601,602,603,604, 605,606,607 |
|
|
73. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 73 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.26.2015_RE Simon Cordell
Appeal 26/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 587 -- 587, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent:26 February 2015
23:28 To: Sharon.Bums@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Appeal Dear Sharon Ø Would it please be possible if you can call me on 07961 re Simon
Cordell appeal please? Regards Lorraine Cordell 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 233. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
Simon Cordell_ (25) /
Page Numbers: 544, From:
Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
26
February 2015 22:31 To: 'GL-BrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Cc: 'Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Subject:
Re: Simon
Cordell Attachments: Simon Cordell Appeal Willesden
Harrow Crown Court.pdf. Found
Guilty again 26-01-2015.pdf Dear
Annabel Jereniah Ø I have just seen the Memorandum
of Entry that the Crown Court has sent and on that it says there was a
Disqualification until test passed. Ø But when we contacted
the court, we were only told about 6 points and a fine for this case and this
was also on the letter from the court.
Ø If I knew a
Disqualification until test passed when I filed my appeal on the 13/02/2015 Ø I would have ticked
this be suspended until appeal was heard.
Ø Can you please look into
this and see if the appeal could include the suspension of the
Disqualification until the appeal is heard? Please see
attached document Ø Simon_ Cordell_
Appeal_ Willesden_ Harrow_ Crown_ Court Found Guilty again 26-01-2015 Ø As you will see the
letter Found Guilty again 26-01-2015 Ø does not show any
disqualification and this was confirmed by the court when we called that
there were 6 points added and a fine. Regards Lorraine Cordell END 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 486. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Appeal / Page Numbers: 1745, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 26 February 2015 22:23 To: listing@harrow.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk Cc: 'Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Appeal Attachments: Simon_Cordell_Appeal_Willesden_Harrow_Crown_Court.pdf;
S Cordell Cert GE_ 20132014.pdf; S
Cordell 020215.pdf To Whom It May Concern: Ø Please
see attached documents re Appeal could all documents be placed on file. Regards 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 487. Harrow Crown,
Listing _ RE_ Simon Cordell Appeal / Page Numbers: 1746, From: Harrow Crown,
Listing listing@harrow.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 26 February 2015 22:24 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Appeal Ø Thank you
for your email, Ø please be aware
that we have received this and will be processing it in due course Which
Section should I contact? Ø To avoid
unnecessary delays, Ø it’s
important that your correspondence reaches the right team so please make sure
you are sending to the correct fax number or email address. Ø For queries
and correspondence regarding Crown Court listing to include; Warned
list, Abandoned Appeals, Appeal Enquiries, confiscation papers,
discontinuances, Bail Applications/ Variations for open cases, skeleton
arguments, Defence Case Statements,
Breaches, and CPS noncompliance with Judge’s directions should be emailed to New Fax number: 0870 3240194
For all general queries and correspondence to include; legal aid
applications (QC/Noting brief), transfers of legal aid, Indictments, Notices
of Appeal, NGs, committals from the Magistrates, requests for results,
Witness summons, Certificate of Convictions and Cashier queries should be
emailed to enquiries@harrrow.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk New fax number: 08703240149 For queries and correspondence for the clerk’s team, including;
days on remand queries, Requests of psychiatric report queries/payment, PCMH
forms queries/requests, application to amend orders, after sentence queries,
slip rule, SERCO bail queries, commendation orders, AF3s should be emailed to results@harrow.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk New fax number: 0870
3240195 This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies
and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure medium.
Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else.
Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response
to this message by email. This email (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice.
Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken
when composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 488.
GL-BRENTMCENQ_RE_ Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1747, From: GLBRENTMCENQ [glbrentmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 26 February 2015 22:33 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Ø Thank you
for emailing the North West and West London Magistrates' Courts
Administration Centre. Please be aware that it has been received and will be
processed. Polite Request: Please refrain from
also sending your correspondence via post/DX or by fax as this risks the
Court duplicating correspondence that has already been received. Thank you
for your cooperation. This email (and any attachment) is intended only for
the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage
or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is
not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read
by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send
material in response to this message by email. This email (whether you are
the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the
Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and
email content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure
laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 74. Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 74 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.26.2015_RE
Simon Cordell Appeal_001 26/02/2015 / Page
Numbers: 588 589,590,591,592,593,594 595,596,597,598 -- 588, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 26 February 2015 22:23 To: 'listing@harrow.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk' Cc: 'Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Appeal Attachments: Simon_Cordell_Appeal_Willesden_Harrow_Crown_Court.pdf S Cordell Cert._ GE-2013-2014.pdf S Cordell 020215.pdf To Whom It May Concern: Ø Please see
attached documents re Appeal could all documents be placed on file. Regards 589, RE: Simon Cordell Appeal->Simon_Cordell_Appeal_Willesden_Harrow_Crown_Court.pdf HM Courts & Tribunals Service CROWN COURT AT HARROW Hailsham Drive Harrow, Middlesex HA1 4TU DX 97335 HARROW 5 Telephone 020
8424 2294 Ext. Fax 020
8424 2209 Mr Simon Paul Cordell 24th February 2015 109 Burncroft
Avenue Enfield Middx EN3 7JQ Dear Sirs Re:
Yourself-v-Central Driving Offences Unit Case number A20150049 The Crown Court
has received a set of appeal papers from the magistrate’s court at Willesden. In order to
assist you, a copy of the memorandum of conviction and sentence is enclosed. The court is
committed to processing appeals as quickly as possible and it would greatly
help the listing of this appeal if you would complete this form and return it
to the Crown Court by the 10 March 2015 If the court does
not have a reply by this date your appeal will be listed without further
consultation. Please note if
you fail to attend that hearing your appeal may be dismissed and further
costs can be awarded against you. If you do not
wish to proceed with your appeal you should contact the court in writing
before this date. ·
Please confirm that the appeal is against
Conviction/Sentence/Conviction & Sentence: Conviction and Sentence ·
Please estimate the time the Appeal’s hearing
will take: I was not there I
am not sure how long these cases take but I would think no more than one
hour. 3. Number &
names of prosecution witnesses
you require: 590, I don’t have any names as I
have never had a summons for this case, and I have had no Dates for court I
don’t know the CPS name that dealt with this case. Number & names of defence
witnesses you require: Not justified to show my
insurance documents and that I was insured to drive by KGM Insurance. Name of counsel: MICHAEL CARROLL & CO. Dates to avoid: 05/03/2015,.10/03/2015, 17/03/2013
and could this please be listed for the afternoon as I need to be able to get
to court. Please confirm if an
interpreter is required: No Your reference: I don’t know this. Your telephone/mobile number:
07961
833021 this is my mother’s number she can talk re this case, also the email
is lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk These details can be faxed to
0870 324 0194 or emailed to listing@harrow.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk Yours sincerely, Mary Graham Appeals Clerk
List Office NOTE: Once an appeal
has been allocated a hearing date it will NOT be changed, save for the
most exceptional reasons. It is, therefore, essential
that all dates to avoid are provided to the court by the date specified
above. Any subsequent application to
move a fixture date will have to be listed before a judge, which does not
automatically mean your application will be granted and may lead to wasted
costs. It has also just been noted
that the court passed a driving disqualification until test passed was issued
for this case which we have only just been made aware of by the paperwork
that has been served and seeing the Memorandum of ENTRY, if this had been
known then I would have asked that the this be suspended until the appeal was
heard in my appeal application. We were only told by the
court that 6 points and a fine had been given by the Judge and also the
letter the court sent shows this Please see letter included within this
paperwork. Can we still ask that the
driving disqualification be suspended until the Appeal is heard.? 2 End of Picture! 591,
End of Picture! 592,
End of Picture! 593,
End of Picture! 594,
End of Picture! 595,
End of Picture! 596,
End of Picture! 597,
End of Picture! 598,
End of Picture! 75. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 75 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.26.2015_Re Simon Cordell 26/02/2015 / Page Numbers: 599,600 601,602,603,604,605,606 607 -- 599, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 26 February 2015 22:31 To: 'GL-BrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Cc: 'Sharon.Burns@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: Simon-Cordell-Appeal-Willesden-Harrow-Crown-Court.pdf Found Guilty
again 26-01-2015.pdf Dear Annabel Jereniah Ø I have just seen the
Memorandum of Entry that the Crown Court has sent and on that it says there
was a Disqualification until test passed.
Ø But when we
contacted the court, we were only told about 6 points and a fine for this
case and this was also on the letter from the court. Ø If I knew a
Disqualification until test passed when I filed my appeal on the 13/02/2015 Ø I would
have ticked this be suspended until appeal was heard. Ø Can you
please look into this and see if the appeal could include the suspension of
the Disqualification until the appeal is heard? Please
see attached document Ø Simon_
Cordell_ Appeal_ Willesden_ Harrow_ Crown_ Court Found Guilty again
26-01-2015 Ø As you will
see the letter Found Guilty again 26-01-2015 Ø does not
show any disqualification and this was confirmed by the court when we called
that there were 6 points added and a fine. Regards Lorraine Cordell 600,601,602,603,604,605,606,607, |
||||
|
|
27/02/2015 |
|||
|
|
|
28/02/2015 |
|
|
Simulation March
2015 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
March
2015 |
||||
|
76. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 76 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.01.2015_FW RE Simon
Cordell 011403134612 01/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 608,609,610,611,612 613,614,615,616,617,618 619,620,621,622,623,624 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 493. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ RE_ Simon Cordell 011403134612 / Page Numbers: 1759,1760 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 5 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 494. Wood, Peter _Re_
Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (5) / Page Numbers: 1761,1762,1763,1764, 1765,1766,1767 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Kingston Crown Court |
01/03/2015 |
15:24:00 |
X17 608 609,610,611,612 613,614,615,616 617,618,619,620 621,622,623,624 |
|
|
76. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 76 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.01.2015_FW RE Simon
Cordell 011403134612 01/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 608,609,610,611,612 613,614,615,616,617,618 619,620,621,622,623,624 -- 608, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 01 March 2015 15:24 To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell 011403134612 Attachments: Found Guilty again 26-01-2015.pdf S Cordell 020215.pdf S Cordell Cert-GE-2013-2014.pdf. RE_ urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899-01.pdf RE_ urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899.pdf RE_ urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899-03.pdf RE_ urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899-04.pdf Lorraine Cordell-RE-Simon Cordell.pdf;
Appeal-Notice-Signed.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 13 February 2015 11:05 To: 'GL-BrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Cc: 'CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox-.SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk Southcju CO16Mailbox-.SouthProsecutionCju@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionCJU@met.pnn.police.uk London.magistratescentralwest@cps.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 011403134612 To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø
I am
writing this email again due to a case being heard at court and me being
found guilty. Ø
On
the 26/01/2015 Ø
Case
number: 011403134612, Ø
I
believe the old case number was 011401596899. Ø
I
have emailed the court many times due to this case I and in my emails
attached my insurance documents. Ø
I
Have done a statutory declaration which I included my insurance documents. Ø
I
know my file must have had my insurance document within there as it was
included in many emails to the court and asked for my emails and documents to
be put on my file. Ø
I
had no letters from the court to say a date of a hearing of the 26/01/2015,
I have asked in emails that have been sent for any dates to be also copied
over to me by email, as there does seem to be an issue with my post. Ø
My
mum Lorraine Cordell and I have asked in many emails and phone calls to the
court for the police officer who checks documents to get him to check my documents
which will confirm I am insured. Ø
None
of this has been done and again I have been found guilty at court for no
insurance when I was insured to drive. Ø I am making this request to have my case listed
in order that I can do the following.
My name: Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981. Address: 109 Burncroft Av Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ Ø I am including in this email 609,
Ø Could you please get
back to me today by return email to lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Ø as I would like to know
what can be done about this case? Ø I have 21 days to
appeal to the crown court and this date is running out very fast so I am also
including the form so I do not run out of time to appeal to the Crown Court
as I feel I will run out of time in this matter. Ø But feel it would be a
waste of time and money for the court and me to address it this way and take
it to appeal at the crown court. Ø I am not sure what CPS
dealt with this case and I do now that the appeal form needs to be addressed
to them also, Ø So, I have included all
that I know off. Ø If I have not included
the right Email for the CPS who dealt with this case can it be forwarded to
them. Or could you please get back to me by email at lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk and let me know the
correct email address this needs to be sent to. Regards Simon Cordell 610,
End of Picture! 611,
End of Picture! 612,
End of Picture! 613, FW: RE: Simon Cordell
011403134612->RE_ urgent Simon Corrdell.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 08 October 2014 18:24 To: gl-brentmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: RE: urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899 Attachments: S Cordell Cert-GE- 2013-2014.pdf Dear sir or Madam Ø I am writing this email
due to the reply dated the 01/10/2014 I got in the post on 06/10/2014
about the email I sent to you on the 12/09/2014 please see below
email dated 12/09/2014. Ø Above is a picture of
the court processing. Ø I did not know about
this not be there. Ø In the email dated the 12/09/2014,
I asked for my case to be listed in order that I could do the following Ø Application to set
aside the conviction Ø Re-open the case Ø The reason for this is
because I have been wrongfully convicted as I did in fact have insurance. Ø As shown in the attached
file. Ø Please can you list my
case in court so I can put the Application to set aside the conviction,
Re-open the case that I reply where you say I have 21 days to file a
statutory declaration due to me being unaware of court case. I have been
wrongfully convicted and have points on my licence, which should file:///C:/Users/Alienware_PC/AppData/Local/Temp/a37e51b1bbcc4e63a3e87e6ea4d... 31/01/2015 614,615,616,617,618,619,620,621,622,623,624, END 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 493. Lorraine
Cordell _Fwd._ RE_ Simon Cordell 011403134612 / Page Numbers: 1759,1760, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 01 March 2015 15:24 To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD' Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell
011403134612 Attachments: Found Guilty again 26-01-2015.pdf. S Cordell 020215.pdf. S Cordell Cert._ GE_ 2013- 2014.pdf. RE_ urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899-01.pdf. RE_ urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899-02.pdf. RE_ urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899-03.pdf. RE_ urgent Simon CORDELL 011401596899-04.pdf. Lorraine Cordell _RE_ Simon Cordell.pdf. Appeal-Notice- Signed.pdf From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 13 February 2015
11:05 To: 'GL-BrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk' Cc: 'CO16Mailbox- NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox-SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk SouthcjuCO16Mailbox-SouthProsecutionCju@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox-NorthProsecutionCJU@met.pnn.police.uk London.MagistratesCentralWest@cps.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 011403134612 To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø
I am
writing this email again due to a case being heard at court and me being
found guilty. Ø
On
the 26/01/2015 Ø
Case
number: 011403134612, Ø
I
believe the old case number was 011401596899. Ø
I
have emailed the court many times due to this case I and in my emails attached
my insurance documents. Ø
I
Have done a statutory declaration which I included my insurance documents. Ø
I
know my file must have had my insurance document within there as it was
included in many emails to the court and asked for my emails and documents to
be put on my file. Ø
I
had no letters from the court to say a date of a hearing of the 26/01/2015,
I have asked in emails that have been sent for any dates to be also copied
over to me by email, as there does seem to be an issue with my post. Ø
My
mum Lorraine Cordell and I have asked in many emails and phone calls to the
court for the police officer who checks documents to get him to check my
documents which will confirm I am insured. Ø
None
of this has been done and again I have been found guilty at court for no
insurance when I was insured to drive. Ø I am making this request to have my case listed
in order that I can do the following.
My name: Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981. Address: 109 Burncroft Av Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ 1760, Ø I am including in this email
Ø Could you please get
back to me today by return email to lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Ø as I would like to know
what can be done about this case? Ø I have 21 days to
appeal to the crown court and this date is running out very fast so I am also
including the form so I do not run out of time to appeal to the Crown Court
as I feel I will run out of time in this matter. Ø But feel it would be a
waste of time and money for the court and me to address it this way and take
it to appeal at the crown court. Ø I am not sure what CPS
dealt with this case and I do now that the appeal form needs to be addressed
to them also, Ø So, I have included all
that I know off. Ø If I have not included
the right Email for the CPS who dealt with this case can it be forwarded to
them. Or could you please get back to me by email at lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk and let me know the
correct email address this needs to be sent to. Regards Simon Cordell 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 494. Wood, Peter
_Re_ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (5) / Page Numbers: 1761,1762,1763,1764,1765,1766,1767, From: Wood, Peter [Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 01 April 2015 16:02 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court Hi Lorraine, Ø Fantastic
holiday thanks, really great time, went by far too quickly and now it’s back
to normal, took me a while to get my head back in the game I must say. Ø I didn’t
realise there was more than 1 court case! Ø This is
going to take some time to sort out but I’m glad to hear you got the right
result on the recent case. Ø I guess all
I can say for the moment is let me know how things go and of course I will
respond again after I have received and considered details of the Police
stops/vehicle seizures we are waiting on. Ø All the
best. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 01 April 2015 15:00 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Peter Ø Thank you for the email and I hope you had a great holiday. Ø I am
waiting for the police compound to get back to us with the data for the
seizers, but they just take so long with everything. Ø There are still
court cases for no insurance that are still ongoing there are 2 left where
Simon did not get any summons form the court and was found guilty due to not
knowing. Ø One is due
to be heard in May 2015 and we are waiting for the last date. Ø DVLA have
now taken of the ban on the 18/03/2015 so the insurance my son has
been paying for the last year and could not be used due to this can now be
used as he can drive now. Ø But there
is still the 12 points on his licence due to the other 2 court cases for no
insurance DVLA do know the 12 points should not be on there in fact they have
also been in contact with the courts they are not happy, but they cannot
remove the points until the cases are heard in court. Ø But an
update to what happened in court case were the police officer lied was Simon
won the case and the judge was very upset at the police officer and put notes
that it needed addressing. Ø The
complaint is ongoing with
the police office that lied, at this time that may take some time as the
police officer may be charged. Ø We won't know fully until the Serious
Misconduct Investigation Unit Directorate of Professional Standards completes
their investigation into what the police officer did and what the crown court
judge said as the judge knows he lied to 2 judges and Simon was found guilty
when he had done nothing wrong. Ø We had a meeting about this on the
26/03/2015 but the person dealing with this is waiting for the crown court
documents as to what the judge said, we should have the court transcript from
Kingston Crown Court just after the Easter holidays. 1762, Ø I will keep you updated as to the data you
need it’s just waiting for it from the police compound as requests had to be
made for the data, Simon did try to get the information without the requests
but the police were not having it so the request had to be put in for it. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 31 March 2015 09:25 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown
Court Hello Lorraine, Ø I trust you
and Simon are well. Ø I was
wondering if you could update me on what’s been happening please? Ø I would
like to make sure there is nothing else we can do and of course to bring this
matter to a conclusion if we can. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 11 February 2015 12:45 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Hi Peter Ø
Thank you so much for all your
help, and I hope you have a wonderful holiday. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter [Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com] Sent: 11 February 2015 11:40 To: Lorraine Cordell; Josephine Ward (josie@michaelcarrollandco.com) Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Hello, Please find attached
signed statement as requested. The original is in the
post to the Burncroft Ave address. If you need anything else
please ask Andy in my absence. 1763,1764,1765,1766,1767, |
||||
|
|
|
02/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/03/2015 |
|
|
|
10. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 10 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.04.2015_RE Simon Cordell
Information 04/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 48,49 “Got put in the
wrong place in the index – Sorted here! was 10” 8 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 497. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Information_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1778,1779 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds
Bank / Canopius! |
04/03/2015 |
10:26:00 |
X2 48,49 |
|
|
11. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.11 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.04.2015_Re Simon
Cordell-Appeal 04/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 50,51,52,53,54 55,56,57,58 |
04/03/2015 |
09:53:00 |
X9 50,51,52 53,54,55,56 57,58, |
|
|
10. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 10 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.04.2015_RE Simon Cordell
Information 04/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 48,49 -- 48, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 04 March 2015 10:26 To: Martin Jenkin Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Information Hi Martin Ø I have not heard from you re the
below email. Ø But could you please send me a
copy today of Simon Currant insurance policy and his no claims please. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 10 February 2015 15:33 To: Martin Jenkin Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Information Hi Martin Ø Just giving you an
update Simon has called to try and speak to you today to make a late payment
on his insurance as he was a day late. Ø could you please make
sure someone calls us to make the payment? Ø As for KGM they are now
dealing and addressing the issues, but it took me to start cc my emails to
them to Lloyds. Ø He has been having it
really hard due to all this insurance with KGM and the courts, and not being
able to drive half the time this policy has been in place due to them keep
revoking his driving licence, until the courts then sort it and put it back
in place. Ø They have again revoked
his driving licence this is the 3 time. Ø I have had to get a
solicitor now to help with the cases of no insurance because I seem to be
getting nowhere. Ø And also, to deal with
the appeal case for the 14/11/2013. Ø I do have the audio now
from KGM that proves the police officer lied and some letters I will attach
to this email just so you are updated. Ø I can't send the audio
due to most places will not accept that file type. Ø So, I have included the
transcript that the solicitor done Ø Could you please also
address doing your section 9 witness statement about the calls for the 14/11/2013
as the appeal case is due to be heard on the 05/03/2015. Ø Could you also please
send over a copy of Simon no claims please? Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin mailto: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 07 January 2015 09:06 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Information Good Morning Lorraine, Ø
Apologies
for the lack of contact, Ø
I
have been in and out of the office. Ø
Have
you received any correspondence from KGM? Ø
we
spoke to them prior to Christmas regarding the issues Ø
and
they have been looking into the situation Ø
and
as far as I am aware, they were going to respond directly. Ø
I
look forward to hearing from you. 49, Regards Martin Jenkin DDI 01843 598744 Broadsure direct INSURANCE INTERMEDIARY t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct - Telephone number: 01843 594477 - Fax
Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as
soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we are able to, and
reserve the right to, monitor e-mail communications passing through our
network. Broadsure Direct Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 28 December 2014 23:59 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Information Hello Martin Ø Can you please get back to me with an update as I not heard anything
from KGM about the email I sent over to you on the 30/11/2014 with the
data that would be needed? Ø I also have not heard anything from you about the section 9 witness
statement. Ø Please can you get back to me as soon as possible. Regards Lorraine This email has been checked for viruses by Avast
antivirus software. www.avast.com END 8 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 497. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell
Information_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1778,1779, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 04 March 2015
10:26 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Information Hi Martin Ø I have not heard from
you re the below email. Ø But could you please
send me a copy today of Simon Currant insurance policy and his no claims
please. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 10 February 2015
15:33 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Information Hi Martin Ø Just giving you an
update Simon has called to try and speak to you today to make a late payment
on his insurance as he was a day late. Ø could you please make
sure someone calls us to make the payment? Ø As for KGM they are now
dealing and addressing the issues, but it took me to start cc my emails to
them to Lloyds. Ø He has been having it
really hard due to all this insurance with KGM and the courts, and not being
able to drive half the time this policy has been in place due to them keep
revoking his driving licence, until the courts then sort it and put it back
in place. Ø They have again revoked
his driving licence this is the 3 time. Ø I have had to get a
solicitor now to help with the cases of no insurance because I seem to be getting
nowhere. Ø And also, to deal with
the appeal case for the 14/11/2013. Ø I do have the audio now
from KGM that proves the police officer lied and some letters I will attach
to this email just so you are updated. Ø I can't send the audio
due to most places will not accept that file type. Ø So, I have included the
transcript that the solicitor done Ø Could you please also
address doing your section 9 witness statement about the calls for the 14/11/2013
as the appeal case is due to be heard on the 05/03/2015. Ø Could you also please
send over a copy of Simon no claims please? Regards Lorraine From: Martin Jenkin [Mail To:martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 07 January 2015
09:06 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Information Good Morning Lorraine, Ø
Apologies
for the lack of contact, Ø
I
have been in and out of the office. Ø
Have
you received any correspondence from KGM? Ø
we
spoke to them prior to Christmas regarding the issues Ø
and
they have been looking into the situation Ø
and
as far as I am aware, they were going to respond directly. Ø
I
look forward to hearing from you. 1779, This email has been
checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843 594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission
is strictly confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation
to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential
information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy,
distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete
the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the right to,
monitor e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct
Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 28 December 2014 23:59 To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Information Hello Martin Ø Can you please get back to me with an update as I not heard anything
from KGM about the email I sent over to you on the 30/11/2014 with the
data that would be needed? Ø I also have not heard anything from you about the section 9 witness
statement. Ø Please can you get back to me as soon as possible. Regards 11. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.11 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.04.2015_Re Simon
Cordell-Appeal 04/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 50,51,52,53,54 55,56,57,58 -- 50, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 04 March 2015 09:53 To: JOSEPHINE WARD Subject: Re: Simon Cordell-Appeal Attachments: DOC034 (2).pdf Appeal-Case-Driving-Tools-26-11-2014.pdf Clerks Notes for
Simon Cordell-03.pdf DOC008 (3).PDF Ø Here you go Josey if you look at
the date of conviction on the letter the court sent you will see it says 29/08/2014
but it did not go to trail till the 26/11/2014 51,
End of Picture! 52,
End of Picture! 53,
End of Picture! 54,
End of Picture! 55,
End of Picture! 56,
End of Picture! 57, Re: Simon
Cordell-Appeal->Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell-03.pdf From: GL-SWESTERNMCENQ To lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Subject: Clerks Notes for Simon Cordell Date: 16 February 2015 09:57:22 Attachments: DOC034.pdf Ø
With
reference to your e-mail of the 10th February please find attached clerks
notes from the trial on the 26th November as requested. Miss J Lee Administration Officer Lavender Hill Magistrates' Court 176a Lavender Hill, London, SW11 1JU Tel: 020 7805 1470 Please note:
As of June 2nd, 2014, our fax will be GOLDFAX No: 0870 324 0299* * 'I am not authorised to bind the Ministry of
Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other statements which
may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic means. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 58,
End of Picture! |
||||
|
|
Willesden The Willesden one seems to have been reheard
at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing again he was found
guilty, but they put this case under a new case number looking at the letter so all
the documents that were sent before was not with the court file I would have
through. Appeal against conviction at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court The dates of conviction were
the 26/11/2014 Wimbledon magistrate’s court.
Appeal date is 05/03/2015 at 10:00 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court GLBRENTMCENQ 011403134612 North West and West London
Magistrates' Courts Administration Centre Sharon. Burns - Met Police 1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 02 Conference
Notes / Page Numbers: N/a I had to
attend at the Courthouse for the Willesden magistrates Court case! Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Willesden Harrow
magistrates! |
05/03/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 02 Conference Notes / Page Numbers: N/a Ø I had to attend at the Courthouse for the
Willesden magistrates Court case! |
||||
|
|
|
06/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
10 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 505. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Public complaint by your son Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 1851,1852 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
09/03/2015 |
|
|
|
10 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 505. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Public complaint by
your son Simon Cordell / Page Numbers:
1851,1852 1851 From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent:
09
March 2015 02:21 To: 'Vicki.McQueen@met.pnn.police.uk
Subject:
RE: Public
complaint by your son Simon Cordell Dear
Victoria McQueen Ø My son had his appeal on the 05/03/2015 which he won; the
judge was not happy with the police officer as it Ø was proved he did in
fact lie, the judge did in fact tell the police office not to leave the court
building. Ø And in fact, we did not show all
the facts we did have the complaint will need updating to show this police
officer lied to 2 judges and in fact got my son convicted wrongly by lying to
the 1st hearing judge and got my son banned from driving and points and a
fine, and within his statement which the judge noted had not been dated and
the fact there were no 101 books for the officer for this day. Ø The ticket was also lost by the
police that was issues on the day the police officer started this which was
on the 14/11/2014. Ø The judge sitting at the court
was not happy, and in fact stopped the hearing as he could clearly see what
the Ø police officer had done. Ø the judges went out and when they
came back, they told my son he had won his case, Ø the judge then spoke to the CPS
about having the real statement and documents from the police officer that
day and that the audio files needed to stay on file. Ø he also told the CPS he was not
happy about the police officer and this had to be passed on to the right
person. Ø Which the CPS said he would do. Ø We are not happy about what this
officer did and the cost it has caused my son and stress to his heath, my
sons insurance was going to close his insurance down for no reason only due
to what the police office said, days making calls to the police stations trying
to prove my son did in fact have no tools in his van on that day, him having
to go to the compound where the van was taken to just so they could call his
insurance company to prove there were
not tools that would have made my son's insurance void, Ø all this due to the police actions on that day for no reason why did
he need to lie, days going to court and hearing a police officer lie in 2
courts. Ø I will again be writing an update to the IPCC about what this
officer has done. Ø Could you please get back to me so this complaint can now be started
I think the police officer should be changed for what he has done. Ø If anyone else lied in court not just once but 2 times they would
end up in prison a police officer doing this is one of the worse cases. Ø And there was no reason for what he did the only reason I can think
of is due to my son being mixed raced. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Vicki.McQueen@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Vicki.McQueen@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 11 December 2013 12:44 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Public complaint by your son
Simon Cordell Ms Cordell, Ø
I tried to call you today to
ask you a question about your son's complaint. Ø
I was unable to get hold of
you. Ø
Please can you reply and let me
know if your son is disputing his penalty notice or not. Ø
If he has requested a Court
hearing (which his complaint would tend to indicate) the complaint will be
classed as 'subjudice' Which means it will be put on hold until Court
proceedings are complete. Regards, Victoria McQueen Detective Sergeant Customer Service Team Metropolitan Police Service Directorate of Professional Stan 1852 SW61TR Tel; 02071616455 (786455) Met Sec Code Restricted Total Policing is the Met's commitment
to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent
crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make
our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do
not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments
may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are
intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received
this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the
information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpoliceuk |
||||
|
|
3 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 508. Tracy Bullock_ DVLA,
Mr. Cordell / Page Numbers: 1863 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! DVLA |
10/03/2015 |
|
|
|
3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 508. Tracy Bullock_
DVLA, Mr Cordell / Page Numbers: 1863, From: Tracy Bullock tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 March 2015 11:18 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: DVLA, Mr Cordell
Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank you
for your Email, I would like to inform you that full details of your driver
record will be sent to you by post. Many Thanks Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework D9 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 8 June 2015 - the
counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership
with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. |
||||
|
|
|
11/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
1 x Email Working on the Asbo
Court Case Defence and I won the Wimbledon court case appeal! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Wimbledon magistrates! |
12/03/2015 |
|
|
|
1 1 x Email Date: Thursday, 12
March 2015, 12:51 Subject: Wimbledon court case appeal won From: Rewired Ø
Hi
mum, this is the letter that I received. Attachments SI CASE 001.jpg
(196.16 KB) |
||||
|
|
77. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 77 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.13.2015_Re Data
Protection team 17/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 625,626,627 1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 509. Melanie Tyman _
REF_ 00-COSX14MT07-ID_86_ Open Attach Documents / Page Numbers: 1868,1869 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 510. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ 00-COSX14MT07-ID_86_ Open Attach Documents / Page Numbers: 1870,1871,1872 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 511. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Data Protection team / Page Numbers: 1873 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
13/03/2015 |
|
|
|
77. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 77 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.13.2015_Re Data
Protection team 17/03/2015 13/03/2015 – 22-32 / Page Numbers: 625,626,627 -- 625, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 13 March 2015 22:32 Subject: Re: Data Protection
team Attachments: Data-Protection-Broadsure.doc To Whom It May Concern: Ø Could you please forward the
attached document to your team that deals with subject access requests under
the data protection Act 1998 Ø Could you please confirm by
return email that this has been done and if there will be a fee needed? Regards Simon Cordell 626, Re: Data Protection
team->Data-Protection-Broadsure.doc Mr Simon Cordell 109
Burncroft Ave Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ 13/03/2015 Broadsure Direct 4th Floor The Argyle Centre York St
Ramsgate Kent CT11 9DS Dear Sir or Madam Subject access
request Mr Simon Cordell
109 Burncroft Ave Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ Please supply the
information about me I am entitled to under the Data Protection Act 1998
relating to: All data that Broadsure
Direct hold on any systems or files about me. All audio call files that
Broadsure Direct hold this would include when the police have called to check
if I was insured. All account Information and
amounts paid. Reason as to why any
insurance policies were cancelled. Dates all policies
started and ended and which company had the policies in force. All data that is
being asked for would be within the period of the last 6 years. This would include
any data that is being held by the whole of Enfield Council ASB Response Team. 627 If you are withholding any
information, I have asked for please make me aware of this and the reason as
to why the data is being denied. If you need any more
information from me, or a fee, please let me know as soon as possible. It may be helpful for you to
know that a request for information under the Data Protection Act 1998 should
be responded to within 40 days. If you do not normally deal
with these requests, please pass this letter to your Data Protection Officer.
If you need advice on dealing with this request, the Information
Commissioner’s Office can assist you and can be contacted on 0303 123 1113 or
at www.ico.org.uk/ Yours faithfully Mr Simon Cordell 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 509. Melanie Tyman_
REF_ 00-COSX14MT07-ID_86_ Open Attach Documents / Page Numbers: 1868,1869, From: Melanie Tyman melanietwyman@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 13 March 2015 11:49 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: REF: 00-COSX14MT07-ID<86> Open Attach Documents Hi Lorraine Ø As requested below are the payments which have
been made to date on the Motor Trade policy from the renewal date of 19/08/2014:
Ø plan: 1.
£180.00 paid 11/02/2015
Ø I hope you find the above in order, if you
have any queries please do not hesitate to contact us. Many thanks Melanie Twyman Finance Manager 1869, Finance Department t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843 594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e‐mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended
solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain
privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended
recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this e‐mail in error, please reply to the
sender as soon as possible and delete the message. Please note that we are
able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e‐mail communications
passing through our network. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Is Authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority. 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 510. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ 00-COSX14MT07-ID_86_ Open Attach Documents / Page Numbers: 1870,1871,1872, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 13 March 2015 20:35 To: 'Melanie Tyman' Subject: RE: 00COSX14MT07ID< 86> Open Attach Documents Hi Melanie Twyman Ø Thank you
for the below email, could I please ask for some other information please for
my records. Ø Could you
please send me all details since April 2014 as to what payments were
made and which polices and the name of the companies the policies applied to?
Ø The
reason's as to why policies were stopped and if any charges was included to
policies being stopped. Ø From my
records he had policies started with: Ø Policy plan
started on the 14/04/2014 deposit paid on this one. Ø Could you
confirm the deposit paid? Ø And how
much 1 month insurance with them should have cost, I have been told by
yourself you lost money due to this policy the problem is I do not understand
why still we was never told this by Martin the 1st time we knew you had lost
money on this policy was when I spoke to you. Ø Policy plan
took the insurance cover out knowing the 2 claims was in place, it was not
Simon fault that after one month into the policy starting Policy plan took
issue with it and closed the policy due to this. Ø Why is it
the case you say you lost £400+ on this policy when I had paid, I
think around £300 deposit this would mean 1 month’s insurance cost
over £700+ when it was Policy plan issue, they knew the 2 claims was
in force so why is it was never told as we would never of allowed the amount
to be paid to them knowing it was down to them, they are the ones that
stopped the policy not my son. Ø 1 month
later after this policy started Policy plan stopped it due to the 2 claims
that where on record with KGM. Ø But I know
they knew about the claims when the policy started as Martin had told them
this before they started the policy, I believe Martin also told them 1 claim
was due to be removed, KGM did take their time removing this claim in the end
I had to deal with it and it was removed I sent over the details to Martin
and it was confirmed it was removed this should have not been kept on Simon
record as he did not own the Vehicle and proved this. Ø Could it
also be confirmed this is not on record for Simon. Ø The 2nd
claim was classed as no fault later I believe could this be confirmed please.
Ø 2nd policy
started 19/05/2015 Co VEA insurance could you please tell me date
these police stopped and what reason and also how much had been paid. Ø 3rd policy
started Policy plan not sure of start date of this. Ø There
should have only been 3 policies since April 2014. Ø But I would
like all information on each of them. Ø And all
payments made. Ø I have also
been sending emails to Martin but have had no replies I have also asked him
to send Simon No claims discount, but nothing has been sent. Ø I have some
real issues as said many times due to the KGM policy Simon had forked out a
lot of money that he should never have had to. Ø There are
around 9 Vehicle seizers at a cost to Simon of around £1800. Ø There are
all the dates he had to go to court for no insurance due to the errors on the
MID database from 2013/2014 while the KGM policy was in place. Ø And due to
4 of them cases where no summons was sent, he was found guilty and points
added he had his licence revoked 3 times and has not been able to drive there is the date of the 14/11/2013 where
the police lied to KGM to void his insurance which nearly happened and due to
KGM failing to deal with 3 subject access requests Simon was found guilty and
banned from driving £1000 he had to paid the court and 6 points on his
licence due to the police officer lied to the Judge under oath about the
so-called tools being in the so he was found guilty again this went to appeal
and was heard on the 05/03/2015 but this time due to me dealing with
KGM in a way I should not have had to, I did in fact get the 1871, Ø information
that was needed to prove in fact the police officer lied, the Judge was
appalled and that is using mid words as to what was said in court because
once again the police officer lied under oath to the judge in fact the police
officer was told not to leave the court building. Ø Simon won
this case and there is a huge complaint with the police at this time. Ø Simon for
the appeal had to pay for a barrister at the cost of £2475.00 Martin
was also asked to do a witness statement for this case but failed to do so. Ø He still
has 2 more appeals for no insurance one listed for May 2015 most of
his 2014/2015 insurance he
has not been able to drive due to KGM and what they made happen to his
driving licence. Ø But I know
cancelling an insurance policy after it has started would incur large costs,
so we have just been paying for something he has really not been able to use.
Ø So yes, a claim
for costs will be going into KGM which will be a large about of money. Ø For what
has happened to my son as he
not been able to work also due to his job which he does need to drive to do
this and has not been able to do so. Ø I also believe I am now going to have to put a
subject access request under the data protection act 1994 into Broadsure
Direct to get all the data as Martin has stopped replying to my emails. Ø If you can confirm the above, I would be
grateful as I will need these for my record. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Melanie Tyman Mail To: melanietwyman@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 13 March 2015 11:49 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: REF: 00COSX14MT07ID<86> Open Attach Documents Hi Lorraine Ø As
requested below are the payments which have been made to date on the Motor
Trade policy from the renewal date of 19/08/2014:
Ø plan: 4. £180.00 paid 11/02/2015 1872,
Ø I
hope you find the above in order, if you have any queries please do not
hesitate to contact us. Many thanks Melanie Twyman Finance
Manager Finance Department t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct number: 01843 594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 This e-mail transmission
is strictly confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation
to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential
information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy,
distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete
the message. Please note that we are able to, and reserve the right to,
monitor e-mail communications passing through our network. Broadsure Direct
Is Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 511. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Data Protection team / Page Numbers: 1873, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 13 March 2015
22:32 To: 'info@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: Re: Data Protection team Attachments: Data-Protection-Broadsure. doc To Whom It May Concern: Ø Could you please
forward the attached document to your team that deals with subject access
requests under the data protection Act 1998 Ø Could you please
confirm by return email that this has been done and if there will be a fee
needed? Regards Simon Cordell |
||||
|
78. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 78 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.14.2015_RE DVLA, Mr
Cordell 14/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 628,629,630 631,632, “Got put in the wrong
place in the index – Sorted here! was 78” 1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 512. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ DVLA, Mr Cordell_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1874,1875 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! DVLA |
14/03/2015 |
00:31:00 |
X5 628,629,630,631, 632, |
|
|
78. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 78 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.14.2015_RE DVLA, Mr
Cordell 14/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 628,629,630 631,632, -- 628, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 14 March 2015 00:31 To: 'Tracy Bullock' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Attachments: appeal-driving-outcome.pdf.
S Cordell 020215.pdf Dear Tracey Bullock Ø
Thank you for the
email I did in fact get your letter today dated the 09/03/2015 ref: 29597142 Ø I would like to ask if you have
had the above update as of yet for the case listed in your letter as 26/11/2014,
as noted in your letter. Ø The appeal hearing was heard on
the 05/03/2015 and I won my appeal. Ø So, this case is dealt with
please see attached document from the crown court re the appeal hearing but,
on their letter, even they have put the date not correct they put the
29/08/2014 as noted that was removed by the court on the 06/10/2014,
and I was again found guilty on the 26/11/2014. Ø The appeal was for this date and
not the 29/08/2014 as I had already had this date reopened and that
was removed. Ø I am contacting the court and
asking for a new letter to be sent with the right date on it as this is just
a mess. Ø I have also noted you said that
the licence was revoked on the 07/02/2015 by DVLA. Ø Due to all the mess-up with my
insurance with KGM from the 2013/2014 and it not showing up on the MID
database, there were a list of cases that I did not get a summon for so did
not know I had to attend court, and was found guilty due to not attending
court, a number of calls have been made to DVLA in regards to this, this is
why cases have been reopened due to the mess up with the courts and also
appeals put in to the courts due to I could not take no more of the mess ups. Ø Could you also please tell me how
many points are on my licence and if it is still revoked? Ø I believe the revoke was for the
case I have just won on appeal and would believe that DVLA should have been
updated to this already, so believe the revoke should not still be in place
as the court has now seen the error and corrected this so I should never have
been convicted and then you would never have revoked my licence, could you
please confirm this by email so I know if I can drive or not and if all the
points are off my licence or I still have points on there. Ø I was trying to address all the
wrong convictions against my name due to the errors in the MID I have really
done nothing wrong to lose my driving licence I was insured to drive please
see KGM LOI. Ø I do understand that this will
need to come from a court, but I am very upset due to everything that has
happened when I had paid for my insurance to drive. Ø I am in fact paying for insurance
right now which due to this mess with the KGM insurance and the courts this
has caused me to suffer badly when I should not have had to, I am in fact
paying for insurance from 2014 to 2015 that I can’t even use due to
all this mess. Ø So, I am insured but cannot
drive. My insurance is not cheap it is costing me around £1600.00 this
is not a small amount to be paying yet I cannot drive due to this mess. Ø I do have an appeal date for the
case you have dated 26/01/2015 that is in May 2015, but I am
really suffering here due to all these errors due to the MID database not
showing me as being insured. Ø I am trying to address all of
these issues and have sent 100's of emails to courts CPS and have even had to
file Appeals because the cases have not been addressed correctly by the
courts, Ø I have sent my insurance
documents to the courts so many times. Ø Even the last appeal case the
judge was appalled due to what has happened to me. Ø I also know there is more dates
when the courts added points etc to my driving licence and then they were
removed due to me proving I was insured. Ø I do have a claim ongoing and
need to show how much this has affected my life. Ø These have not been included in
your letter, could you please look at my driving record from 2013 to
date of all cases that the court added points etc and then they were removed
as I need to prove the impact this has had on my life, Ø I also know there were I believe
1 or 2 more times my Licence was revoked and then put back in place due to
the court updating DVLA and I do know there is more dates you have not
included in your letter. Ø Could you please get back to me by
email ASAP to tell me if I am now allowed to drive or if my licence is still
revoked due to the errors of the courts and Insurance Company and if any
points are still on there? Ø Could you also please confirm
everything also in writing, so I do have a letter confirming everything as
things are still being addressed also with the courts and there is still one
appeal date? Regards Simon Cordell 629, From: Tracy Bullock mailto: tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 March 2015 11:18 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank
you for your Email, I would like to inform you that full details of your
driver record will be sent to you by post. Many Thanks Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Case work 1D9 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency 8 June 2015 - the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership
with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 630,
End of Picture! 631,
End of Picture! 632,
End of Picture! 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 512. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ DVLA, Mr Cordell_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1874,1875, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 14 March 2015
00:31 To: 'Tracy Bullock' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Attachments: appeal-driving-outcome.pdf S Cordell 020215.pdf Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank you for the email
I did in fact get your letter today dated the 09/03/2015 ref: 29597142 Ø I would like to ask if
you have had the above update as of yet for the case listed in your letter as
26/11/2014, as noted in your letter. Ø The appeal hearing was
heard on the 05/03/2015 and I won my appeal. Ø So, this case is dealt
with please see attached document from the crown court re the appeal hearing
but, on their letter, even they have put the date not correct they put the
29/08/2014 as noted that was removed by the court on the 06/10/2014,
and I was again found guilty on the 26/11/2014. Ø The appeal was for this
date and not the 29/08/2014 as I had already had this date reopened
and that was removed. Ø I am contacting the
court and asking for a new letter to be sent with the right date on it as
this is just a mess. Ø I have also noted you
said that the licence was revoked on the 07/02/2015 by DVLA. Ø Due to all the mess-up
with my insurance with KGM from the 2013/2014 and it not showing up on
the MID database, there were a list of cases that I did not get a summon for
so did not know I had to attend court, and was found guilty due to not
attending court, a number of calls have been made to DVLA in regards to this,
this is why cases have been reopened due to the mess up with the courts and
also appeals put in to the courts due to I could not take no more of the mess
ups. Ø Could you also please
tell me how many points are on my licence and if it is still revoked? Ø I believe the revoke
was for the case I have just won on appeal and would believe that DVLA should
have been updated to this already, so believe the revoke should not still be
in place as the court has now seen the error and corrected this so I should
never have been convicted and then you would never have revoked my licence,
could you please confirm this by email so I know if I can drive or not and if
all the points are off my licence or I still have points on there. Ø I was trying to address
all the wrong convictions against my name due to the errors in the MID I have
really done nothing wrong to lose my driving licence I was insured to drive
please see KGM LOI. Ø I do understand that
this will need to come from a court, but I am very upset due to everything
that has happened when I had paid for my insurance to drive. Ø I am in fact paying for
insurance right now which due to this mess with the KGM insurance and the
courts this has caused me to suffer badly when I should not have had to, I am
in fact paying for insurance from 2014 to 2015 that I can’t even use
due to all this mess. Ø So, I am insured but
cannot drive. My insurance is not cheap it is costing me around £1600.00
this is not a small amount to be paying yet I cannot drive due to this mess. Ø I do have an appeal
date for the case you have dated 26/01/2015 that is in May 2015,
but I am really suffering here due to all these errors due to the MID
database not showing me as being insured. Ø I am trying to address
all of these issues and have sent 100's of emails to courts CPS and have even
had to file Appeals because the cases have not been addressed correctly by
the courts, Ø I have sent my
insurance documents to the courts so many times. Ø Even the last appeal
case the judge was appalled due to what has happened to me. Ø I also know there is
more dates when the courts added points etc to my driving licence and then
they were removed due to me proving I was insured. Ø I do have a claim
ongoing and need to show how much this has affected my life. Ø These have not been
included in your letter, could you please look at my driving record from 2013
to date of all cases that the court added points etc and then they were
removed as I need to prove the impact this has had on my life, Ø I also know there were
I believe 1 or 2 more times my Licence was revoked and then put back in place
due to the court updating DVLA and I do know there is more dates you have not
included in your letter. Ø Could you please get
back to me by email ASAP to tell me if I am now allowed to drive or if my
licence is still revoked due to the errors of the courts and Insurance
Company and if any points are still on there? Ø Could you also please
confirm everything also in writing, so I do have a letter confirming
everything as things are still being addressed also with the courts and there
is still one appeal date? 1875, Regards Simon Cordell From: Tracy Bullock Mail To: tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 March 2015
11:18 To: 'lorraine32@bl ueyonder.co.uk' Subject: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank
you for your Email, I would like to inform you that full details of your
driver record will be sent to you by post. Many Thanks Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework D9 | DVLA
| Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 8 June 2015 - the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 78. |
||||
|
|
|
15/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 513. Melanie Tyman _RE_
00-COSX14MT07-ID_86_ Open Attach Documents / Page Numbers: 1876,1877,1878,1879 Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
16/03/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 513. Melanie Tyman _RE_
00-COSX14MT07-ID_86_ Open Attach Documents / Page Numbers: 1876,1877,1878,1879, From: Melanie Tyman melanietwyman@broadsuredirect.com Sent: 16 March 2015 11:54 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Cc: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com Subject: RE: 00COSX14MT07ID<
86> Open Attach Documents Hi Lorraine. Ø Thank you for your email. Ø As advised by telephone today I will detail
the payments made on the policies incepted from April 2014 as
requested. Ø All queries not related to payment collections
will be confirmed to you by Martin Jenkin, he has advised he will be
contacting you today to discuss further. Ø I will be on Annual Leave as from 19/03/2015
so if you have any questions please email to martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com
Kind regards Melanie Twyman Finance manager 1877,1878,1879, |
||||
|
77. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 77 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.13.2015_Re Data
Protection team 17/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 625,626,627 Error with file need to
check for it! 3 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 514. Lorraine Cordell
_Fwd._ DVLA, Mr. Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1880,1881 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! DVLA |
17/03/2015 |
22:23:00 |
X3 625,626,627 |
|
|
79. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 79 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.17.2015_FW DVLA, Mr
Cordell 17/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 633,634,635,636 637 |
17/03/2015 |
13:12:00 |
X5 633,634,635,636 637 |
|
|
3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 514. Lorraine
Cordell _Fwd._ DVLA, Mr Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1880,1881, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 17 March 2015 13:12 To: 'tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: FW: DVLA, Mr Cordell Attachments: appeal-driving-outcome.pdf;
S Cordell 020215.pdf Dear Tracey Bullock Ø I have not
had a reply to my below email and therefore was wondering if there were any
updates. Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 14 March 2015
00:31 To: 'Tracy Bullock' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank you for the email
I did in fact get your letter today dated the 09/03/2015 ref: 29597142 Ø I would like to ask if
you have had the above update as of yet for the case listed in your letter as
26/11/2014, as noted in your letter. Ø The appeal hearing was
heard on the 05/03/2015 and I won my appeal. Ø So, this case is dealt
with please see attached document from the crown court re the appeal hearing
but, on their letter, even they have put the date not correct they put the
29/08/2014 as noted that was removed by the court on the 06/10/2014,
and I was again found guilty on the 26/11/2014. Ø The appeal was for this
date and not the 29/08/2014 as I had already had this date reopened
and that was removed. Ø I am contacting the
court and asking for a new letter to be sent with the right date on it as
this is just a mess. Ø I have also noted you
said that the licence was revoked on the 07/02/2015 by DVLA. Ø Due to all the mess-up
with my insurance with KGM from the 2013/2014 and it not showing up on
the MID database, there were a list of cases that I did not get a summon for
so did not know I had to attend court, and was found guilty due to not
attending court, a number of calls have been made to DVLA in regards to this,
this is why cases have been reopened due to the mess up with the courts and
also appeals put in to the courts due to I could not take no more of the mess
ups. Ø Could you also please
tell me how many points are on my licence and if it is still revoked? Ø I believe the revoke
was for the case I have just won on appeal and would believe that DVLA should
have been updated to this already, so believe the revoke should not still be
in place as the court has now seen the error and corrected this so I should
never have been convicted and then you would never have revoked my licence,
could you please confirm this by email so I know if I can drive or not and if
all the points are off my licence or I still have points on there. Ø I was trying to address
all the wrong convictions against my name due to the errors in the MID I have
really done nothing wrong to lose my driving licence I was insured to drive
please see KGM LOI. Ø I do understand that
this will need to come from a court, but I am very upset due to everything
that has happened when I had paid for my insurance to drive. Ø I am in fact paying for
insurance right now which due to this mess with the KGM insurance and the
courts this has caused me to suffer badly when I should not have had to, I am
in fact paying for insurance from 2014 to 2015 that I can’t even use
due to all this mess. Ø So, I am insured but
cannot drive. My insurance is not cheap it is costing me around £1600.00
this is not a small amount to be paying yet I cannot drive due to this mess. Ø I do have an appeal
date for the case you have dated 26/01/2015 that is in May 2015,
but I am really suffering here due to all these errors due to the MID
database not showing me as being insured. Ø I am trying to address
all of these issues and have sent 100's of emails to courts CPS and have even
had to file Appeals because the cases have not been addressed correctly by
the courts, Ø I have sent my
insurance documents to the courts so many times. Ø Even the last appeal
case the judge was appalled due to what has happened to me. 1881, Ø I also know there is
more dates when the courts added points etc to my driving licence and then
they were removed due to me proving I was insured. Ø I do have a claim
ongoing and need to show how much this has affected my life. Ø These have not been
included in your letter, could you please look at my driving record from 2013
to date of all cases that the court added points etc and then they were
removed as I need to prove the impact this has had on my life, Ø I also know there were
I believe 1 or 2 more times my Licence was revoked and then put back in place
due to the court updating DVLA and I do know there is more dates you have not
included in your letter. Ø Could you please get
back to me by email ASAP to tell me if I am now allowed to drive or if my
licence is still revoked due to the errors of the courts and Insurance
Company and if any points are still on there? Ø Could you also please
confirm everything also in writing, so I do have a letter confirming
everything as things are still being addressed also with the courts and there
is still one appeal date? Regards Simon Cordell From: Tracy Bullock Mail To: tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 March 2015
11:18 To: 'lorraine32@bl ueyonder.co.uk' Subject: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank
you for your Email, I would like to inform you that full details of your
driver record will be sent to you by post. Many Thanks Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA
| Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 8 June 2015 - the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart The original of this email
was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 79. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 79 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.17.2015_FW DVLA, Mr
Cordell 17/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 633,634,635,636 637 -- 633, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 17 March 2015 13:12 To: 'tracey.bollock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk' Subject: FW: DVLA, Mr Cordell Attachments: appeal-driving-outcome.pdf; S Cordell-020215.pdf Dear Tracey Bullock Ø I
have not had a reply to my below email and therefore was wondering if there
were any updates. Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 14 March 2015 00:31 To: 'Tracy Bullock' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank you for the email
I did in fact get your letter today dated the 09/03/2015 ref: 29597142 Ø I would like to ask if
you have had the above update as of yet for the case listed in your letter as
26/11/2014, as noted in your letter. Ø The appeal hearing was
heard on the 05/03/2015 and I won my appeal. Ø So, this case is dealt
with please see attached document from the crown court re the appeal hearing
but, on their letter, even they have put the date not correct they put the
29/08/2014 as noted that was removed by the court on the 06/10/2014,
and I was again found guilty on the 26/11/2014. Ø The appeal was for this
date and not the 29/08/2014 as I had already had this date reopened
and that was removed. Ø I am contacting the
court and asking for a new letter to be sent with the right date on it as
this is just a mess. Ø I have also noted you
said that the licence was revoked on the 07/02/2015 by DVLA. Ø Due to all the mess-up
with my insurance with KGM from the 2013/2014 and it not showing up on
the MID database, there were a list of cases that I did not get a summon for
so did not know I had to attend court, and was found guilty due to not
attending court, a number of calls have been made to DVLA in regards to this,
this is why cases have been reopened due to the mess up with the courts and
also appeals put in to the courts due to I could not take no more of the mess
ups. Ø Could you also please
tell me how many points are on my licence and if it is still revoked? Ø I believe the revoke
was for the case I have just won on appeal and would believe that DVLA should
have been updated to this already, so believe the revoke should not still be
in place as the court has now seen the error and corrected this so I should
never have been convicted and then you would never have revoked my licence,
could you please confirm this by email so I know if I can drive or not and if
all the points are off my licence or I still have points on there. Ø I was trying to address
all the wrong convictions against my name due to the errors in the MID I have
really done nothing wrong to lose my driving licence I was insured to drive
please see KGM LOI. Ø I do understand that
this will need to come from a court, but I am very upset due to everything
that has happened when I had paid for my insurance to drive. Ø I am in fact paying for
insurance right now which due to this mess with the KGM insurance and the
courts this has caused me to suffer badly when I should not have had to, I am
in fact paying for insurance from 2014 to 2015 that I can’t even use
due to all this mess. Ø So, I am insured but
cannot drive. My insurance is not cheap it is costing me around £1600.00
this is not a small amount to be paying yet I cannot drive due to this mess. Ø I do have an appeal
date for the case you have dated 26/01/2015 that is in May 2015,
but I am really suffering here due to all these errors due to the MID
database not showing me as being insured. Ø I am trying to address
all of these issues and have sent 100's of emails to courts CPS and have even
had to file Appeals because the cases have not been addressed correctly by
the courts, Ø I have sent my
insurance documents to the courts so many times. Ø Even the last appeal
case the judge was appalled due to what has happened to me. Ø I also know there is
more dates when the courts added points etc to my driving licence and then
they were removed due to me proving I was insured. Ø I do have a claim
ongoing and need to show how much this has affected my life. Ø These have not been
included in your letter, could you please look at my driving record from 2013
to date of all cases that the court added points etc and then they were 634, removed as I need to
prove the impact this has had on my life, Ø I also know there were
I believe 1 or 2 more times my Licence was revoked and then put back in place
due to the court updating DVLA and I do know there is more dates you have not
included in your letter. Ø Could you please get
back to me by email ASAP to tell me if I am now allowed to drive or if my
licence is still revoked due to the errors of the courts and Insurance
Company and if any points are still on there? Ø Could you also please
confirm everything also in writing, so I do have a letter confirming
everything as things are still being addressed also with the courts and there
is still one appeal date? Regards Simon Cordell From: Tracy Bullock mailto: tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 March 2015 11:18 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank
you for your Email, I would like to inform you that full details of your
driver record will be sent to you by post. Many Thanks Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency 8 June 2015 - the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership
with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 635,636,637, |
||||
|
80. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 80 tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk_03.18.2015_RE DVLA, Mr
Cordell_001 18/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 638,639,640,641 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 515. Tracy Bullock _RE_
DVLA, Mr. Cordell / Page Numbers: 1882,1883,1884 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! DVLA 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 516. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ DVLA, Mr. Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1885,1886,1887,1888 5 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 517. Tracy Bullock _RE_
DVLA, Mr. Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1889,1890,1891,1892,1893 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! DVLA 6 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 518. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ DVLA, Mr. Cordell / Page Numbers: 1894,1895,1896,1897,1898 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! DVLA 7 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 519. Lorraine Cordell
_Fwd._ DVLA, Mr. Cordell / Page Numbers: 1899,1900,1901,1902,1903 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! DVLA 8 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 520. GL-BROMLEYMCENQ_RE_
Simon Cordell 1403116916 / Page Numbers: 1904,1905 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 9 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 521. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1906,1907,1908 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 |
18/03/2015 |
12:46:00 |
X4 638,639,640,641 |
|
|
81. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1.81 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.18.2015_RE DVLA, Mr
Cordell_001 18/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 642 643,644,645,646 |
18/03/2015 |
13:56:00 |
X5 642 643,644,645,646 |
|
|
82. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 82 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.18.2015_RE Simon Cordell
1403116916 18/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 647,648 649,650,651,652,653 |
18/03/2015 |
17:38:00 |
X7 647,648 649,650,651,652, 653 |
|
|
80. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 80 tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk_03.18.2015_RE DVLA, Mr
Cordell_001 18/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 638,639,640,641 -- 638, From: Tracy Bullock tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 12:46 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Attachments: Cordell.doc Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank you for your Email, please
see attached letter to the Crown Court to which we are awaiting a reply. Ø Your driving licence was revoked
due to it not being returned for updating with the latest hearing details of
the 26/01/2015, Ø however, as a gesture of goodwill
due to incorrect information being provided by the Crown Court, we will lift
this revocation to enable you to drive pending the outcome of your case. Ø In the meantime, you will need to
forward your licence to us for updating, we appreciate you are returning to
court regarding this offence in May, however by law the information needs to
be updated onto your current driving licence until this date. Ø Should your appeal be successful
we will then issue you with a free replacement licence. Ø In reply to your query regarding
the points on your record I can confirm there are 6 points for the
IN10 offence of the 20/05/2014 and 6 points for the IN10 offence for
the 01/01/2014, however these can be removed when instructed by the
Court. Ø I hope this information will be
helpful. Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Case work lD9 | DVLA |
Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 Driver & Vehicle
Licensing Agency 8 June 2015 - the counterpart
is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 17 March 2015 13:12 To: Tracy Bullock Subject: FW: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø I
have not had a reply to my below email and therefore was wondering if there
were any updates. Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 14 March 2015 00:31 To: 'Tracy Bullock' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell 639, Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank you for the email
I did in fact get your letter today dated the 09/03/2015 ref: 29597142 Ø I would like to ask if
you have had the above update as of yet for the case listed in your letter as
26/11/2014, as noted in your letter. Ø The appeal hearing was
heard on the 05/03/2015 and I won my appeal. Ø So, this case is dealt
with please see attached document from the crown court re the appeal hearing
but, on their letter, even they have put the date not correct they put the
29/08/2014 as noted that was removed by the court on the 06/10/2014,
and I was again found guilty on the 26/11/2014. Ø The appeal was for this
date and not the 29/08/2014 as I had already had this date reopened
and that was removed. Ø I am contacting the
court and asking for a new letter to be sent with the right date on it as
this is just a mess. Ø I have also noted you
said that the licence was revoked on the 07/02/2015 by DVLA. Ø Due to all the mess-up
with my insurance with KGM from the 2013/2014 and it not showing up on
the MID database, there were a list of cases that I did not get a summon for
so did not know I had to attend court, and was found guilty due to not
attending court, a number of calls have been made to DVLA in regards to this,
this is why cases have been reopened due to the mess up with the courts and
also appeals put in to the courts due to I could not take no more of the mess
ups. Ø Could you also please
tell me how many points are on my licence and if it is still revoked? Ø I believe the revoke was
for the case I have just won on appeal and would believe that DVLA should
have been updated to this already, so believe the revoke should not still be
in place as the court has now seen the error and corrected this so I should
never have been convicted and then you would never have revoked my licence,
could you please confirm this by email so I know if I can drive or not and if
all the points are off my licence or I still have points on there. Ø I was trying to address
all the wrong convictions against my name due to the errors in the MID I have
really done nothing wrong to lose my driving licence I was insured to drive
please see KGM LOI. Ø I do understand that
this will need to come from a court, but I am very upset due to everything
that has happened when I had paid for my insurance to drive. Ø I am in fact paying for
insurance right now which due to this mess with the KGM insurance and the
courts this has caused me to suffer badly when I should not have had to, I am
in fact paying for insurance from 2014 to 2015 that I can’t even use
due to all this mess. Ø So, I am insured but
cannot drive. My insurance is not cheap it is costing me around £1600.00
this is not a small amount to be paying yet I cannot drive due to this mess. Ø I do have an appeal
date for the case you have dated 26/01/2015 that is in May 2015,
but I am really suffering here due to all these errors due to the MID
database not showing me as being insured. Ø I am trying to address
all of these issues and have sent 100's of emails to courts CPS and have even
had to file Appeals because the cases have not been addressed correctly by
the courts, Ø I have sent my
insurance documents to the courts so many times. Ø Even the last appeal
case the judge was appalled due to what has happened to me. Ø I also know there is
more dates when the courts added points etc to my driving licence and then
they were removed due to me proving I was insured. Ø I do have a claim
ongoing and need to show how much this has affected my life. Ø These have not been
included in your letter, could you please look at my driving record from 2013
to date of all cases that the court added points etc and then they were
removed as I need to prove the impact this has had on my life, Ø I also know there were
I believe 1 or 2 more times my Licence was revoked and then put back in place
due to the court updating DVLA and I do know there is more dates you have not
included in your letter. Ø Could you please get
back to me by email ASAP to tell me if I am now allowed to drive or if my
licence is still revoked due to the errors of the courts and Insurance
Company and if any points are still on there? Ø Could you also please
confirm everything also in writing, so I do have a letter confirming
everything as things are still being addressed also with the courts and there
is still one appeal date? Regards Simon Cordell From: Tracy Bullock mailto: tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 March 2015 11:18 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: DVLA, Mr Cordell 640, Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank
you for your Email, I would like to inform you that full details of your
driver record will be sent to you by post. Many Thanks Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Case work l D9 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 Driver
& Vehicle Licensing Agency 8 June 2015 - the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.aov.uk/dvia/nomorecounterpart The original of this email
was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service
supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. This email was scanned by the
Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of
problems, please call your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi
may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. The original of this email
was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 641, EXCELLENCE INVESTORS IN PEOPLE RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell->Cordell.doc Driver and Vehicle Licensing
Agency CCU/CCG CRTSCWK1 Longview Road
Swansea SA6 7JL Telephone 01792 384522 Fax 01792 782748 Minicom 01792 766366 Web Site www.gov.uk/browse/driving Our reference: 29597142 Date: 16 March 2015 Dear Sir or Madam, Mr Simon Paul Cordell Ø
The above-named
driver has contacted DVLA claiming to have successfully appealed on the 05/03/2015
against a conviction at your Court on the 26/11/2014. Ø
Would you please
forward a copy of the result of the appeal to DVLA, quoting our reference
number on all correspondence? Ø
Failure to remove
this conviction from DVLA records may result in the revocation of entitlement
to drive. Yours faithfully Tracy Bullock END 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 515. Tracy Bullock _RE_ DVLA, Mr Cordell / Page Numbers: 1882,1883,1884, From: Tracy Bullock tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 18 March 2015
12:46 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Attachments: Cordell.doc Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank you for your
Email, please see attached letter to the Crown Court to which we are awaiting
a reply. Ø Your driving licence
was revoked due to it not being returned for updating with the latest hearing
details of the 26/01/2015, Ø however, as a gesture
of goodwill due to incorrect information being provided by the Crown Court,
we will lift this revocation to enable you to drive pending the outcome of
your case. Ø In the meantime, you
will need to forward your licence to us for updating, we appreciate you are
returning to court regarding this offence in May, however by law the
information needs to be updated onto your current driving licence until this
date. Ø Should your appeal be
successful we will then issue you with a free replacement licence. Ø In reply to your query
regarding the points on your record I can confirm there are 6 points
for the IN10 offence of the 20/05/2014 and 6 points for the IN10
offence for the 01/01/2014, however these can be removed when
instructed by the Court. Ø I hope this information
will be helpful. Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Case work D9 | DVLA
| Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 8 June 2015 - the counterpart is abolished
Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 17 March 2015 13:12 To: Tracy Bullock Subject: FW: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø I
have not had a reply to my below email and therefore was wondering if there
were any updates. Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 14 March 2015
00:31 To: 'Tracy Bullock' 1883, Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank you for the email
I did in fact get your letter today dated the 09/03/2015 ref: 29597142 Ø I would like to ask if
you have had the above update as of yet for the case listed in your letter as
26/11/2014, as noted in your letter. Ø The appeal hearing was
heard on the 05/03/2015 and I won my appeal. Ø So, this case is dealt
with please see attached document from the crown court re the appeal hearing
but, on their letter, even they have put the date not correct they put the
29/08/2014 as noted that was removed by the court on the 06/10/2014,
and I was again found guilty on the 26/11/2014. Ø The appeal was for this
date and not the 29/08/2014 as I had already had this date reopened
and that was removed. Ø I am contacting the
court and asking for a new letter to be sent with the right date on it as
this is just a mess. Ø I have also noted you
said that the licence was revoked on the 07/02/2015 by DVLA. Ø Due to all the mess-up
with my insurance with KGM from the 2013/2014 and it not showing up on
the MID database, there were a list of cases that I did not get a summon for
so did not know I had to attend court, and was found guilty due to not
attending court, a number of calls have been made to DVLA in regards to this,
this is why cases have been reopened due to the mess up with the courts and
also appeals put in to the courts due to I could not take no more of the mess
ups. Ø Could you also please
tell me how many points are on my licence and if it is still revoked? Ø I believe the revoke was
for the case I have just won on appeal and would believe that DVLA should
have been updated to this already, so believe the revoke should not still be
in place as the court has now seen the error and corrected this so I should
never have been convicted and then you would never have revoked my licence,
could you please confirm this by email so I know if I can drive or not and if
all the points are off my licence or I still have points on there. Ø I was trying to address
all the wrong convictions against my name due to the errors in the MID I have
really done nothing wrong to lose my driving licence I was insured to drive
please see KGM LOI. Ø I do understand that
this will need to come from a court, but I am very upset due to everything
that has happened when I had paid for my insurance to drive. Ø I am in fact paying for
insurance right now which due to this mess with the KGM insurance and the
courts this has caused me to suffer badly when I should not have had to, I am
in fact paying for insurance from 2014 to 2015 that I can’t even use
due to all this mess. Ø So, I am insured but
cannot drive. My insurance is not cheap it is costing me around £1600.00
this is not a small amount to be paying yet I cannot drive due to this mess. Ø I do have an appeal
date for the case you have dated 26/01/2015 that is in May 2015,
but I am really suffering here due to all these errors due to the MID
database not showing me as being insured. Ø I am trying to address
all of these issues and have sent 100's of emails to courts CPS and have even
had to file Appeals because the cases have not been addressed correctly by
the courts, Ø I have sent my
insurance documents to the courts so many times. Ø Even the last appeal
case the judge was appalled due to what has happened to me. Ø I also know there is
more dates when the courts added points etc to my driving licence and then
they were removed due to me proving I was insured. Ø I do have a claim
ongoing and need to show how much this has affected my life. Ø These have not been
included in your letter, could you please look at my driving record from 2013
to date of all cases that the court added points etc and then they were
removed as I need to prove the impact this has had on my life, Ø I also know there were
I believe 1 or 2 more times my Licence was revoked and then put back in place
due to the court updating DVLA and I do know there is more dates you have not
included in your letter. Ø Could you please get
back to me by email ASAP to tell me if I am now allowed to drive or if my
licence is still revoked due to the errors of the courts and Insurance
Company and if any points are still on there? Ø Could you also please
confirm everything also in writing, so I do have a letter confirming
everything as things are still being addressed also with the courts and there
is still one appeal date? Regards Simon Cordell 1884, From: Tracy Bullock Mail To: tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 March 2015
11:18 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank you for your Email, I would like to inform
you that full details of your driver record will be sent to you by post. Many Thanks Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework D9 | DVLA
| Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 8 June 2015 - the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart Twitter: | Facebook: | YouTube: The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please
call your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. The
original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 516. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ DVLA, Mr Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1885,1886,1887,1888, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 18 March 2015 13:56 To: 'Tracy Bullock' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Attachments: Appeal-Harrow-14-05-2015. Pdf Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank you
for the reply to my email. Ø Can you
please tell me which case the 20/05/2014 was for and what court dealt
with it please and what date it was dealt on by the court as this was not
included in your letter and I knew nothing about this case until today so I
will have to contact the court who dealt with this and get it addressed, as I
was insured. Ø I know
about the date of the 01/01/2014 as this one is going to appeal please
see the appeal date letter attached. Ø This one is
going to appeal on the 14/05/2015 at Harrow crown court. Ø The date of
the 14/11/2013 has had the appeal hearing and this was won on the 05/03/2015
which you should have had the information from the court to remove this case
from your records. Ø But I know
there were more dates that cases were heard at court and I was found guilty
and points were added and then removed since 2013 to date it is these
dates, I would like included to show the problems I have had when paying for
insurance and errors due to it not showing on the MID database as I was in
fact insured. Ø Sorry for
the time this is taking it is such a mess as dates was not sent nor summons
and I was found guilty when I was insured, I have written so many emails to
the courts and CPS but don't get replies all I want is to get all these cases
sorted so there are no points on my licence and back to normal. Regards Simon Cordell From: Tracy Bullock mailto: tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 18 March 2015
12:46 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank you for your
Email, please see attached letter to the Crown Court to which we are awaiting
a reply. Ø Your driving licence
was revoked due to it not being returned for updating with the latest hearing
details of the 26/01/2015, Ø however, as a gesture
of goodwill due to incorrect information being provided by the Crown Court,
we will lift this revocation to enable you to drive pending the outcome of
your case. Ø In the meantime, you
will need to forward your licence to us for updating, we appreciate you are
returning to court regarding this offence in May, however by law the
information needs to be updated onto your current driving licence until this
date. Ø Should your appeal be
successful we will then issue you with a free replacement licence. Ø In reply to your query
regarding the points on your record I can confirm there are 6 points
for the IN10 offence of the 20/05/2014 and 6 points for the IN10
offence for the 01/01/2014, however these can be removed when
instructed by the Court. 1886, I hope this information
will be helpful. Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework D9 | DVLA
| Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 8 June 2015 - the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 17 March 2015
13:12 To: Tracy Bullock Subject: FW: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø I
have not had a reply to my below email and therefore was wondering if there
were any updates. Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 14 March 2015
00:31 To: 'Tracy Bullock' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank you for the email
I did in fact get your letter today dated the 09/03/2015 ref: 29597142 Ø I would like to ask if
you have had the above update as of yet for the case listed in your letter as
26/11/2014, as noted in your letter. Ø The appeal hearing was
heard on the 05/03/2015 and I won my appeal. Ø So, this case is dealt
with please see attached document from the crown court re the appeal hearing
but, on their letter, even they have put the date not correct they put the
29/08/2014 as noted that was removed by the court on the 06/10/2014,
and I was again found guilty on the 26/11/2014. Ø The appeal was for this
date and not the 29/08/2014 as I had already had this date reopened
and that was removed. Ø I am contacting the
court and asking for a new letter to be sent with the right date on it as
this is just a mess. Ø I have also noted you
said that the licence was revoked on the 07/02/2015 by DVLA. Ø Due to all the mess-up
with my insurance with KGM from the 2013/2014 and it not showing up on
the MID database, there were a list of cases that I did not get a summon for
so did not know I had to attend court, and was found guilty due to not
attending court, a number of calls have been made to DVLA in regards to this,
this is why cases have been reopened due to the mess up with the courts and
also appeals put in to the courts due to I could not take no more of the mess
ups. Ø Could you also please
tell me how many points are on my licence and if it is still revoked? Ø I believe the revoke
was for the case I have just won on appeal and would believe that DVLA should
have been updated to this already, so believe the revoke should not still be
in place as the court has now seen the error and corrected this so I should
never have been convicted and then you would never have revoked my licence,
could you please confirm this by email so I know if I can drive or not and if
all the points are off my licence or I still have points on 1887, there. Ø I was trying to address
all the wrong convictions against my name due to the errors in the MID I have
really done nothing wrong to lose my driving licence I was insured to drive
please see KGM LOI. Ø I do understand that
this will need to come from a court, but I am very upset due to everything
that has happened when I had paid for my insurance to drive. Ø I am in fact paying for
insurance right now which due to this mess with the KGM insurance and the
courts this has caused me to suffer badly when I should not have had to, I am
in fact paying for insurance from 2014 to 2015 that I can’t even use
due to all this mess. Ø So, I am insured but
cannot drive. My insurance is not cheap it is costing me around £1600.00
this is not a small amount to be paying yet I cannot drive due to this mess. Ø I do have an appeal
date for the case you have dated 26/01/2015 that is in May 2015,
but I am really suffering here due to all these errors due to the MID
database not showing me as being insured. Ø I am trying to address
all of these issues and have sent 100's of emails to courts CPS and have even
had to file Appeals because the cases have not been addressed correctly by
the courts, Ø I have sent my
insurance documents to the courts so many times. Ø Even the last appeal
case the judge was appalled due to what has happened to me. Ø I also know there is
more dates when the courts added points etc to my driving licence and then
they were removed due to me proving I was insured. Ø I do have a claim
ongoing and need to show how much this has affected my life. Ø These have not been
included in your letter, could you please look at my driving record from 2013
to date of all cases that the court added points etc and then they were
removed as I need to prove the impact this has had on my life, Ø I also know there were
I believe 1 or 2 more times my Licence was revoked and then put back in place
due to the court updating DVLA and I do know there is more dates you have not
included in your letter. Ø Could you please get
back to me by email ASAP to tell me if I am now allowed to drive or if my
licence is still revoked due to the errors of the courts and Insurance
Company and if any points are still on there? Ø Could you also please
confirm everything also in writing, so I do have a letter confirming
everything as things are still being addressed also with the courts and there
is still one appeal date? Regards Simon Cordell From: Tracy Bullock mailto: tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 March 2015
11:18 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank you for your Email, I would like to inform
you that full details of your driver record will be sent to you by post. Many Thanks Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA
| Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 8 June 2015 - the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart 1888, Twitter: | Facebook: | YouTube: The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please
call your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. The
original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 517. Tracy Bullock
_RE_ DVLA, Mr Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1889,1890,1891,1892,1893, From: Tracy Bullock tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 14:39 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø The Court
case with the offence date of the 20/05/2014 is as follows: ‐ South East London
Magistrates' Court Date of Conviction
– 06/11/2014 Ø Offence – IN10 Date of Offence – 20/05/2014 Ø Fine ‐ £600 Ø Points – 6 South East London
Magistrates' Court Bromley
Magistrates' Court London Road Bromley Kent BR1 1RQ Telephone no ‐ 020 8437 3500 Ø Hope this information is of help to you Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 Ø 8 June 2015 the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 13:56 To: Tracy Bullock Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank
you for the reply to my email. Ø Can
you please tell me which case the 20/05/2014 was for and what court
dealt with it please and what date it was dealt on by the court as this was
not included in your letter and I knew nothing about this case until today so
I will have to contact the court who dealt with this and get it addressed, as
I was insured. Ø I
know about the date of the 01/01/2014 as this one is going to appeal
please see the appeal date letter attached. Ø This
one is going to appeal on the 14/05/2015 at Harrow crown court. Ø The
date of the 14/11/2013 has had the appeal hearing and this was won on
the 05/03/2015 which you should have had the information from the
court to remove this case from your records. Ø But
I know there were more dates that cases were heard at court and I was found
guilty and points were added and then removed since 2013 to date it is
these dates, I would like included to show the problems I have had when
paying for insurance and errors due to it not showing on the MID database as
I was in fact insured. Ø Sorry
for the time this is taking it is such a mess as dates was not sent nor
summons and I was found guilty when I was insured, I have written so many
emails to the courts and CPS but don't get replies all I want is to get all
these cases sorted so there are no points on my licence and back to normal. 1890,1891,1892,1893, 6 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 518. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ DVLA, Mr Cordell / Page Numbers: 1894,1895,1896,1897,1898, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 18 March 2015 14:48 To: 'Tracy Bullock' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank you
again for the reply but why can’t the court do their job correctly I filed a
statutory declaration on the 02/12/2014 for this case and have been
waiting to hear from them this is doing me in sorry I getting really upset
now but thank you for the information. Ø I will call
the court now. Regards Simon Cordell From: Tracy Bullock mailto:tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 14:39 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø The
Court case with the offence date of the 20/05/2014 is as follows: ‐ South East London Magistrates' Court Date of Conviction – 06/11/2014 Ø Offence
– IN10 Date of Offence – 20/05/2014 Ø Fine
‐ £600 Ø Points
– 6 South East London Magistrates' Court Bromley Magistrates' Court London Road Bromley Kent BR1 1RQ Telephone no ‐ 020
8437 3500 Ø Hope
this information is of help to you Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA
| Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 Ø 8
June 2015 the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart 1895, From: Lorraine Cordell mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 13:56 To: Tracy Bullock Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank
you for the reply to my email. Ø Can
you please tell me which case the 20/05/2014 was for and what court
dealt with it please and what date it was dealt on by the court as this was
not included in your letter and I knew nothing about this case until today so
I will have to contact the court who dealt with this and get it addressed, as
I was insured. Ø I
know about the date of the 01/01/2014 as this one is going to appeal
please see the appeal date letter attached. Ø This
one is going to appeal on the 14/05/2015 at Harrow crown court. Ø The
date of the 14/11/2013 has had the appeal hearing and this was won on
the 05/03/2015 which you should have had the information from the
court to remove this case from your records. Ø But
I know there were more dates that cases were heard at court and I was found
guilty and points were added and then removed since 2013 to date it is
these dates, I would like included to show the problems I have had when
paying for insurance and errors due to it not showing on the MID database as
I was in fact insured. Ø Sorry
for the time this is taking it is such a mess as dates was not sent nor
summons and I was found guilty when I was insured, I have written so many
emails to the courts and CPS but don't get replies all I want is to get all
these cases sorted so there are no points on my licence and back to normal. Regards Simon Cordell From: Tracy Bullock mailto: tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 12:46 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank you for your
Email, please see attached letter to the Crown Court to which we are awaiting
a reply. Ø Your driving licence
was revoked due to it not being returned for updating with the latest hearing
details of the 26/01/2015, Ø however, as a gesture
of goodwill due to incorrect information being provided by the Crown Court,
we will lift this revocation to enable you to drive pending the outcome of
your case. Ø In the meantime, you
will need to forward your licence to us for updating, we appreciate you are
returning to court regarding this offence in May, however by law the
information needs to be updated onto your current driving licence until this
date. Ø Should your appeal be
successful we will then issue you with a free replacement licence. Ø In reply to your query
regarding the points on your record I can confirm there are 6 points
for the IN10 offence of the 20/05/2014 and 6 points for the IN10
offence for the 01/01/2014, however these can be removed when
instructed by the Court. Ø I
hope this information will be helpful. 1896, Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA
| Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 8 June 2015 the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 17 March 2015 13:12 To: Tracy Bullock Subject: FW: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø I
have not had a reply to my below email and therefore was wondering if there
were any updates. Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 14 March 2015 00:31 To: 'Tracy Bullock' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank you for the email
I did in fact get your letter today dated the 09/03/2015 ref: 29597142 Ø I would like to ask if
you have had the above update as of yet for the case listed in your letter as
26/11/2014, as noted in your letter. Ø The appeal hearing was
heard on the 05/03/2015 and I won my appeal. Ø So, this case is dealt
with please see attached document from the crown court re the appeal hearing
but, on their letter, even they have put the date not correct they put the
29/08/2014 as noted that was removed by the court on the 06/10/2014,
and I was again found guilty on the 26/11/2014. Ø The appeal was for this
date and not the 29/08/2014 as I had already had this date reopened
and that was removed. Ø I am contacting the
court and asking for a new letter to be sent with the right date on it as
this is just a mess. Ø I have also noted you
said that the licence was revoked on the 07/02/2015 by DVLA. Ø Due to all the mess-up
with my insurance with KGM from the 2013/2014 and it not showing up on
the MID database, there were a list of cases that I did not get a summon for
so did not know I had to attend court, and was found guilty due to not
attending court, a number of calls have been made to DVLA in regards to this,
this is why cases have been reopened due to the mess up with the courts and
also appeals put in to the courts due to I could not take no more of the mess
ups. Ø Could you also please
tell me how many points are on my licence and if it is still revoked? Ø I believe the revoke
was for the case I have just won on appeal and would believe that DVLA should
have been updated to this already, so believe the revoke should not still be
in place as the court has now seen the error and corrected this so I should
never have been convicted and then you would never have revoked my licence,
could you please confirm this by email so I know if I can drive or not and if
all the points are off my licence or I still have points on there. Ø I was trying to address
all the wrong convictions against my name due to the errors in the MID I have
really done 1897, Ø nothing wrong to lose
my driving licence I was insured to drive please see KGM LOI. Ø I do understand that
this will need to come from a court, but I am very upset due to everything
that has happened when I had paid for my insurance to drive. Ø I am in fact paying for
insurance right now which due to this mess with the KGM insurance and the
courts this has caused me to suffer badly when I should not have had to, I am
in fact paying for insurance from 2014 to 2015 that I can’t even use
due to all this mess. Ø So, I am insured but
cannot drive. My insurance is not cheap it is costing me around £1600.00
this is not a small amount to be paying yet I cannot drive due to this mess. Ø I do have an appeal
date for the case you have dated 26/01/2015 that is in May 2015,
but I am really suffering here due to all these errors due to the MID
database not showing me as being insured. Ø I am trying to address
all of these issues and have sent 100's of emails to courts CPS and have even
had to file Appeals because the cases have not been addressed correctly by
the courts, Ø I have sent my
insurance documents to the courts so many times. Ø Even the last appeal
case the judge was appalled due to what has happened to me. Ø I also know there is
more dates when the courts added points etc to my driving licence and then
they were removed due to me proving I was insured. Ø I do have a claim
ongoing and need to show how much this has affected my life. Ø These have not been
included in your letter, could you please look at my driving record from 2013
to date of all cases that the court added points etc and then they were
removed as I need to prove the impact this has had on my life, Ø I also know there were
I believe 1 or 2 more times my Licence was revoked and then put back in place
due to the court updating DVLA and I do know there is more dates you have not
included in your letter. Ø Could you please get
back to me by email ASAP to tell me if I am now allowed to drive or if my
licence is still revoked due to the errors of the courts and Insurance
Company and if any points are still on there? Ø Could you also please
confirm everything also in writing, so I do have a letter confirming everything
as things are still being addressed also with the courts and there is still
one appeal date? Regards Simon Cordell From: Tracy Bullock mailto: tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 March 2015 11:18 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank you for your Email, I would like to inform
you that full details of your driver record will be sent to you by post. Many Thanks Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA
| Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 8 June 2015 the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart 1898, The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet antivirus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec.
(CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your
organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. This email was scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet antivirus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec.
(CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your
organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 7 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 519. Lorraine
Cordell _Fwd._ DVLA, Mr Cordell / Page Numbers: 1899,1900,1901,1902,1903, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 18 March 2015 15:07 To: 'Tracy Bullock' Subject: FW: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Just an
update to the below email as I just spoke to the court, they never acted on
the statutory declaration Filed to the court on the 02/12/2014 and
just closed it, the case was never re opened for some reason the lady is
trying to get the file now and she going to call me back this is for the date
20/05/2014. getting so upset over all of this mess the court tell you
to do something you do what you are told file the right things and wait for a
date how can a court not action a legal document file is beyond me. Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 14:48 To: 'Tracy Bullock' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank
you again for the reply but why can’t the court do their job correctly I
filed a statutory declaration on the 02/12/2014 for this case and have
been waiting to hear from them this is doing me in sorry I getting really
upset now but thank you for the information. Ø I
will call the court now. Regards Simon Cordell From: Tracy Bullock mailto: tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 14:39 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø The
Court case with the offence date of the 20/05/2014 is as follows: ‐ South East London Magistrates' Court Date of Conviction – 06/11/2014 Ø Offence
– IN10 Date of Offence – 20/05/2014 Ø Fine
‐ £600 Ø Points
– 6 South East London Magistrates' Court Bromley Magistrates' Court London Road Bromley Kent BR1 1RQ Telephone no ‐ 020
8437 3500 Ø Hope
this information is of help to you 1900, Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA
| Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 Ø 8
June 2015 the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 13:56 To: Tracy Bullock Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank
you for the reply to my email. Ø Can
you please tell me which case the 20/05/2014 was for and what court
dealt with it please and what date it was dealt on by the court as this was
not included in your letter and I knew nothing about this case until today so
I will have to contact the court who dealt with this and get it addressed, as
I was insured. Ø I
know about the date of the 01/01/2014 as this one is going to appeal
please see the appeal date letter attached. Ø This
one is going to appeal on the 14/05/2015 at Harrow crown court. Ø The
date of the 14/11/2013 has had the appeal hearing and this was won on
the 05/03/2015 which you should have had the information from the
court to remove this case from your records. Ø But
I know there were more dates that cases were heard at court and I was found guilty
and points were added and then removed since 2013 to date it is these
dates, I would like included to show the problems I have had when paying for
insurance and errors due to it not showing on the MID database as I was in
fact insured. Ø Sorry
for the time this is taking it is such a mess as dates was not sent nor
summons and I was found guilty when I was insured, I have written so many
emails to the courts and CPS but don't get replies all I want is to get all
these cases sorted so there are no points on my licence and back to normal. Regards Simon Cordell From: Tracy Bullock mailto: tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 12:46 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank you for your Email,
please see attached letter to the Crown Court to which we are awaiting a
reply 1901,1902,1903, 8 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 520.
GL-BROMLEYMCENQ_RE_ Simon Cordell 1403116916 / Page Numbers: 1904,1905, From: GLBROMLEYMCENQ glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 17:38 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
1403116916 Ø This is an
automatically generated message acknowledging your recent E Mail to the Customer Service Team. Ø Please note
a full reply will only be sent if appropriate. Ø Please DO
NOT re‐submit your enquiry by E Mail, fax or letter as duplicates
create unnecessary paperwork and delays. CONTACT
DETAILS FOR BROMLEY ADMINISTRATION CENTRE (for Bromley, Bexley and Greenwich Magistrates Courts) as
follows: Telephone: 020 8437 3500 or 020 8437 3585 Gold fax:
0870 324
0223 E Mail: GL‐BromleyMCSummons@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for ongoing summons case enquiries) GL‐BromleyMCEnq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for all concluded case enquiries) GL‐BromleyMCList@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for ongoing charge case & Legal Aid enquiries) SEGroupResultingEnquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for Court result enquiries) Other useful E Mail contacts: GL‐CAO.CORRESPOND@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for all fines enquiries) Enquiries@bromley.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk (for Civil Proceeding enquiries) Thank you, Customer Service Team This email (and any attachment) is
intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use,
disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email.
Internet email is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding
whether to send material in response to this message by email. This email
(whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and
retained by the Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may
be used, and email content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility
to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their
contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the
Government Secure Intranet virus scanning 1905, service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 9 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 521. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1906,1907,1908, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 18 March 2015 17:38 To: 'GLBROMLEYMCENQ' Cc: CO16Mailbox.SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk Southcju CO16Mailbox.SouthProsecutionCju@met.pnn.police.uk O'Sullivan Emma' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
1403116916 Attachments: Insurance20140520184559.pdf; Emma O'SullivanSimonCordell.pdf To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø I am
writing this email due to many problems with a case that has been ongoing for
no insurance the old case number was 1402647845 the new case number is
1403116916. Ø The Problem
I have been having is not getting a summon this was the 1st thing so did not
know a court date and was found guilty when I did not know I was due to
attend court. Ø Many emails
have been sent including my insurance I had a list of cases due to an
insurance policy I had with KGM this insurance did not show up on the MID
database and I had my vehicles seized around 9 times when in fact I had paid
for my insurance. Ø Then this
case happened on the 20/5/2014 this was on a new policy with a new
insurance company please see attached insurance document. Ø The
insurance started on the 19/05/2014 and I believe this is why this one
was not showing on the MID on the 20/05/2014 as it was too short a
time. Ø I have sent
many emails to the CPS who do not reply but I do get the read replies so I
know the emails are getting opened the only reason I got the above emails
addresses was due to all the email I was sending to the main CPS and calls I
was making one day I was put though to a manager of traffic CPS as I was so
upset on the phone to what was going on. Ø I explained
all the problems I was having all the calls and emails that were being sent,
her name was Emma O'Sullivan please see attached email. Ø The only
traffic CPS that has replied was from Ø CO16Mailbox.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Ø a wonderful
lady called Sharon Burns. Ø I have also
been sending emails to the court for the above listed case and have been
including my insurance policy, I have been getting replies to my emails where
I was told to file a statutory declaration which I did for this case on the 02/12/2014
at Highbury Magistrates Court. Ø When I came
out of court, I was told to go to the court office where a lady took all the
papers for the statutory declaration including a copy of my insurance papers.
Ø I was told
I would get a date in the post with a new date hearing. Ø I have been
waiting for the date to come but as of, yet I did not get one for this case. Ø I also did
not get a date for the other statutory declaration I done on the same date
and that case was heard again on the 26/01/2015 again I was found
guilty and was very upset and just filed an appeal which will be heard on the
14/05/2015 at Harrow crown court. Ø But for the
Bromley Magistrates' Court case I not had anything. Ø For the
past 4 weeks I been dealing with a lady called Tracey Bullock Administrative
Officer, Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY due to the CPS not
getting back to me with what was on my driving licence today she sent me this
over Ø Dear Mr
Cordell Ø The Court
case with the offence date of the 20/05/2014 is as follows: ‐ Ø South East
London Magistrates' Court Ø Date of
Conviction – 06/11/2014 1907, Ø Offence –
IN10 Date of Offence –
20/05/2014 Ø Fine ‐
£600 Ø Points – 6 South East London Magistrates' Court Bromley Magistrates' Court London Road Bromley Kent BR1 1RQ Telephone no ‐ 020 8437
3500 Ø Hope this
information is of help to you 1900, Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA |
Swansea | SA99 1AY Ø Now I got
very upset as I knew I had filed the statutory declaration for this case and
seeing the conviction date this was clearly wrong as I had filed the
statutory declaration after this date. Ø I made a
call to the court and was told that the statutory declaration filed in error
and was closed, so was never reopened. Ø The lady I
spoke to said she was going to get the file out and get the right person to
call me but give me an update call just to let me know it had been done. Ø I then got
a call from a lady called Donna and while on the phone to her the other lady
called me from the court to say it had been done. Ø I told her
I was on the phone to Donna and she told me that is who I needed to speak to.
Ø I was shocked
to hear the lady say to me that the case was heard on the 18/12/2014 and
I was found guilty again as I did not turn up, but I have had no letters so
how was I meant to show up when I did not know I needed to. Ø But this
cannot be right as looking at the information DVLA hold it is the old
information to the 1st hearing, as far as I have been told by the court when
a statutory declaration is filed the court would have to contact DVLA and
remove the old conviction they had on file this has not been done by the
court. Ø so how
could the case have been heard on the 18/12/2014. Ø something
is really not right here at all as it is all the old information that DVLA
have on file which should have been removed when the statutory declaration
was filed on the 02/12/2014. Ø I would
like this case looked into and set aside and it to be reopened. Ø I would
also like the summons sent to me for this case that was meant to have been
sent out to me which I have never had and the letter of a hearing for the 18/12/2014
could this please be sent via email to this email address. Ø Also, if
the court is not willing to deal with this could you please give me the right
to appeal to the crown court and I will file the correct paperwork to the
court. Ø Could it
also be made sure that the right CPS get the files and my insurance policy so
it can be checked I was in fact insured. Ø And an
update as to what will happen as it is very upsetting that I am been found
guilty for no insurance when in fact I do pay for my insurance. Regards 1908, Lorraine Cordell Simon Cordell 81. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1.81 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.18.2015_RE DVLA, Mr
Cordell_001 18/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 642 643,644,645,646 -- 642, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 18 March 2015 13:56 To: 'Tracy Bullock' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Attachments: Appeal-Harrow-14-05-2015.pdf Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank
you for the reply to my email. Ø Can
you please tell me which case the 20/05/2014 was for and what court
dealt with it please and what date it was dealt on by the court as this was
not included in your letter and I knew nothing about this case until today so
I will have to contact the court who dealt with this and get it addressed, as
I was insured. Ø I
know about the date of the 01/01/2014 as this one is going to appeal
please see the appeal date letter attached. Ø This
one is going to appeal on the 14/05/2015 at Harrow crown court. Ø The
date of the 14/11/2013 has had the appeal hearing and this was won on
the 05/03/2015 which you should have had the information from the
court to remove this case from your records. Ø But
I know there were more dates that cases were heard at court and I was found
guilty and points were added and then removed since 2013 to date it is
these dates, I would like included to show the problems I have had when
paying for insurance and errors due to it not showing on the MID database as
I was in fact insured. Ø Sorry
for the time this is taking it is such a mess as dates was not sent nor
summons and I was found guilty when I was insured, I have written so many
emails to the courts and CPS but don't get replies all I want is to get all
these cases sorted so there are no points on my licence and back to normal. Regards Simon Cordell From: Tracy Bullock [mailto:tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 18 March 2015 12:46 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank you for your
Email, please see attached letter to the Crown Court to which we are awaiting
a reply. Ø Your driving licence
was revoked due to it not being returned for updating with the latest hearing
details of the 26/01/2015, Ø however, as a gesture
of goodwill due to incorrect information being provided by the Crown Court,
we will lift this revocation to enable you to drive pending the outcome of
your case. Ø In the meantime, you
will need to forward your licence to us for updating, we appreciate you are
returning to court regarding this offence in May, however by law the
information needs to be updated onto your current driving licence until this
date. Ø Should your appeal be
successful we will then issue you with a free replacement licence. Ø In reply to your query
regarding the points on your record I can confirm there are 6 points
for the IN10 offence of the 20/05/2014 and 6 points for the IN10
offence for the 01/01/2014, however these can be removed when
instructed by the Court. Ø I
hope this information will be helpful. 643, Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Case work lD9
| DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency 8 June 2015 - the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 17 March 2015 13:12 To: Tracy Bullock Subject: FW: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø I
have not had a reply to my below email and therefore was wondering if there
were any updates. Regards Simon Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 14 March 2015 00:31 To: 'Tracy Bullock' Subject: RE: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Tracey Bullock Ø Thank you for the email
I did in fact get your letter today dated the 09/03/2015 ref: 29597142 Ø I would like to ask if
you have had the above update as of yet for the case listed in your letter as
26/11/2014, as noted in your letter. Ø The appeal hearing was
heard on the 05/03/2015 and I won my appeal. Ø So, this case is dealt
with please see attached document from the crown court re the appeal hearing
but, on their letter, even they have put the date not correct they put the
29/08/2014 as noted that was removed by the court on the 06/10/2014,
and I was again found guilty on the 26/11/2014. Ø The appeal was for this
date and not the 29/08/2014 as I had already had this date reopened
and that was removed. Ø I am contacting the
court and asking for a new letter to be sent with the right date on it as
this is just a mess. Ø I have also noted you
said that the licence was revoked on the 07/02/2015 by DVLA. Ø Due to all the mess-up
with my insurance with KGM from the 2013/2014 and it not showing up on
the MID database, there were a list of cases that I did not get a summon for
so did not know I had to attend court, and was found guilty due to not
attending court, a number of calls have been made to DVLA in regards to this,
this is why cases have been reopened due to the mess up with the courts and
also appeals put in to the courts due to I could not take no more of the mess
ups. Ø Could you also please
tell me how many points are on my licence and if it is still revoked? Ø I believe the revoke
was for the case I have just won on appeal and would believe that DVLA should
have been updated to this already, so believe the revoke should not still be
in place as the court has now seen the error and corrected this so I should
never have been convicted and then you would never have revoked my licence,
could you please confirm this by email so I know if I can drive or not and if
all the points are off my licence or I still have points on there. Ø I was trying to address
all the wrong convictions against my name due to the errors in the MID I have
really done nothing wrong to lose my driving licence I was insured to drive please
see KGM LOI. Ø I do understand that
this will need to come from a court, but I am very upset due to everything
that has happened when I had paid for my insurance to drive. 644, Ø I am in fact paying for
insurance right now which due to this mess with the KGM insurance and the
courts this has caused me to suffer badly when I should not have had to, I am
in fact paying for insurance from 2014 to 2015 that I can’t even use
due to all this mess. Ø So, I am insured but
cannot drive. My insurance is not cheap it is costing me around £1600.00
this is not a small amount to be paying yet I cannot drive due to this mess. Ø I do have an appeal
date for the case you have dated 26/01/2015 that is in May 2015,
but I am really suffering here due to all these errors due to the MID
database not showing me as being insured. Ø I am trying to address
all of these issues and have sent 100's of emails to courts CPS and have even
had to file Appeals because the cases have not been addressed correctly by
the courts, Ø I have sent my insurance
documents to the courts so many times. Ø Even the last appeal
case the judge was appalled due to what has happened to me. Ø I also know there is
more dates when the courts added points etc to my driving licence and then
they were removed due to me proving I was insured. Ø I do have a claim
ongoing and need to show how much this has affected my life. Ø These have not been
included in your letter, could you please look at my driving record from 2013
to date of all cases that the court added points etc and then they were
removed as I need to prove the impact this has had on my life, Ø I also know there were
I believe 1 or 2 more times my Licence was revoked and then put back in place
due to the court updating DVLA and I do know there is more dates you have not
included in your letter. Ø Could you please get
back to me by email ASAP to tell me if I am now allowed to drive or if my
licence is still revoked due to the errors of the courts and Insurance
Company and if any points are still on there? Ø Could you also please
confirm everything also in writing, so I do have a letter confirming
everything as things are still being addressed also with the courts and there
is still one appeal date? Regards Simon Cordell From: Tracy Bullock mailto: tracey.bullock@dvla.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 10 March 2015 11:18 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: DVLA, Mr Cordell Dear Mr Cordell Ø Thank you for your Email, I would like to inform
you that full details of your driver record will be sent to you by post. Many Thanks Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework 1 D9 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY GTN 1213 Ext. 86326 (01792) 786326 Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency 8 June 2015 - the counterpart is abolished Find out more at: www.gov.uk/dvla/nomorecounterpart The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership
with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been
certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 645,646, 82. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 82 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_03.18.2015_RE Simon Cordell
1403116916 18/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 647,648 649,650,651,652,653 -- 647, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 18 March 2015 17:38 To: 'GL-BROMLEYMCENQ' Cc: 'CO16Mailbox-.SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk SouthcjuCO16Mailbox-.SouthProsecutionCju@met.pnn.police.uk O'Sullivan Emma Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Attachments: Insurance-2014-05-20-184559.pd Emma-O'Sullivan-Simon Cordell.pdf To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø I
am writing this email due to many problems with a case that has been ongoing
for no insurance the old case number was 1402647845 the new case
number is 1403116916. Ø The
Problem I have been having is not getting a summon this was the 1st thing so
did not know a court date and was found guilty when I did not know I was due
to attend court. Ø Many
emails have been sent including my insurance I had a list of cases due to an
insurance policy I had with KGM this insurance did not show up on the MID
database and I had my vehicles seized around 9 times when in fact I had paid
for my insurance. Ø Then
this case happened on the 20/5/2014 this was on a new policy with a
new insurance company please see attached insurance document. Ø The
insurance started on the 19/05/2014 and I believe this is why this one
was not showing on the MID on the 20/05/2014 as it was too short a
time. Ø I
have sent many emails to the CPS who do not reply but I do get the read
replies so I know the emails are getting opened the only reason I got the
above emails addresses was due to all the email I was sending to the main CPS
and calls I was making one day I was put though to a manager of traffic CPS
as I was so upset on the phone to what was going on. Ø I
explained all the problems I was having all the calls and emails that were
being sent, her name was Emma O'Sullivan please see attached email. Ø The
only traffic CPS that has replied was from Ø CO16Mailbox.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Ø a
wonderful lady called Sharon Burns. Ø I
have also been sending emails to the court for the above listed case and have
been including my insurance policy, I have been getting replies to my emails
where I was told to file a statutory declaration which I did for this case on
the 02/12/2014 at Highbury Magistrates Court. Ø When
I came out of court, I was told to go to the court office where a lady took
all the papers for the statutory declaration including a copy of my insurance
papers. Ø I
was told I would get a date in the post with a new date hearing. Ø I
have been waiting for the date to come but as of, yet I did not get one for
this case. Ø I
also did not get a date for the other statutory declaration I done on the
same date and that case was heard again on the 26/01/2015 again I was
found guilty and was very upset and just filed an appeal which will be heard
on the 14/05/2015 at Harrow crown court. Ø But
for the Bromley Magistrates' Court case I not had anything. Ø For
the past 4 weeks I been dealing with a lady called Tracey Bullock
Administrative Officer, Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY due to
the CPS not getting back to me with what was on my driving licence today she
sent me this over Ø Dear
Mr Cordell Ø The
Court case with the offence date of the 20/05/2014 is as follows: ‐ Ø South
East London Magistrates' Court Ø Date
of Conviction – 06/11/2014 Dear Mr Cordell The Court case with the offence date of the 20/05/2014 is as follows: South East London Magistrates' Court Date of Conviction - 06/11/2014
Offence - IN10 Date of Offence - 20/05/2014 648, Fine - £600 Points - 6 South East London Magistrates' Court Bromley Magistrates' Court London
Road Bromley Kent BR1 IRQ Telephone no - 020 8437 3500 Hope this information is of help to you Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Case work lD9 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY Ø Now
I got very upset as I knew I had filed the statutory declaration for this
case and seeing the conviction date this was clearly wrong as I had filed the
statutory declaration after this date. Ø I
made a call to the court and was told that the statutory declaration filed in
error and was closed, so was never reopened. Ø The
lady I spoke to said she was going to get the file out and get the right
person to call me but give me an update call just to let me know it had been
done. Ø I
then got a call from a lady called Donna and while on the phone to her the
other lady called me from the court to say it had been done. Ø I
told her I was on the phone to Donna and she told me that is who I needed to
speak to. Ø I
was shocked to hear the lady say to me that the case was heard on the 18/12/2014
and I was found guilty again as I did not turn up, but I have had no
letters so how was I meant to show up when I did not know I needed to. Ø But
this cannot be right as looking at the information DVLA hold it is the old
information to the 1st hearing, as far as I have been told by the court when
a statutory declaration is filed the court would have to contact DVLA and
remove the old conviction they had on file this has not been done by the
court. Ø so
how could the case have been heard on the 18/12/2014. Ø something
is really not right here at all as it is all the old information that DVLA
have on file which should have been removed when the statutory declaration
was filed on the 02/12/2014. Ø I
would like this case looked into and set aside and it to be reopened. Ø I
would also like the summons sent to me for this case that was meant to have
been sent out to me which I have never had and the letter of a hearing for
the 18/12/2014 could this please be sent via email to this email
address. Ø Also,
if the court is not willing to deal with this could you please give me the
right to appeal to the crown court and I will file the correct paperwork to
the court. Ø Could
it also be made sure that the right CPS get the files and my insurance policy
so it can be checked I was in fact insured. And an update as to what will happen as it is
very upsetting that I am been found guilty for no insurance when in fact I do
pay for my insurance Regards Lorraine Cordell Simon Cordell 649, Blank Page! 650,
End of Picture! 651, RE: Simon Cordell
1403116916->Emma O'Sullivan-Simon Cordell.pdf From: O Sullivan Emma To: CO16Mailbox-. NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk: CO16Mailbox- SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk: Southcju (CO16Mailbox- SouthProsecutionCiu@met.pnn.police.uk CO16Mailbox-. NorthProsecutionCJU@met.pnn.police.uk
Cc: lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk Subject: FW: Simon Cordell Date: 11 February 2015 15:24:41 Attachments: S Cordell 020215.pdf Found Guilty again 26-01-2015.pdf S Cordell Cert._ GE 2013-2014.pdf image2014-05-20-184559.pdf Dear All, Ø Please could you kindly
assist Lorraine Cordell on behalf of her son Simon Cordell. Ø They believe that a
number of summons have been issued against Simon for the offence of no
insurance since 2013 due to an error made by the insurance company as
per the attached letter. Ø Unfortunately, due to
Simon not always receiving the summons/adjournment notice they are unsure how
many cases have been issued against him and are trying to get them all
reopened and listed before court to be heard together in light of the above. Ø Please would you be
able to check your database and confirm to the email address below the number
of cases with reference number, court, and conviction date. Ø I have also spoken to
her on the phone and informed Lorraine that she will need to contact the
court directly to make application to reopen/stat decs, which she can only do
so once the information has been obtained. Ø The only matter the cps
are currently aware of is for the case ref J63181495 which is listed
for appeal at Kingston Crown Court 05/03/15. Ø If you are unable to
advise her on summons that have been issued on her son, please could you
kindly advise her where she could obtain the information. Kind Regards, Emma O'Sullivan London Traffic Unit Admin Line Manager 02033571604 Rose Court, 4th Floor Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, DX 154263 Southwark 12. From: London traffic team
Sent: 10 February 2015
14:41 To: O'Sullivan Emma Subject: FW: Simon Cordell 652, From: London magistrates
central west Sent: 10 February 2015
13:25 To: London traffic team
Subject: FW: Simon Cordell FYI From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 10 February 2015 13:06 To: GL-BrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Cc: London magistrates central west London magistrates south London magistrate’s northeast. gl-bromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell To whom it may concern: Ø
I am writing this email due to
the number of problems I have been having due to a policy of insurance I had
with KGM insurance which did not show up on the MID database in the week it
was fine as I carried my insurance documents with me at all times and the
insurance company could be called, Ø
but the problems were when the
insurance company was closed as the police could not contact them. Ø
My mum Lorraine Cordell and I
have sent many emails to the courts with my insurance documents, but there
have been cases where I have not had a summons. Ø
So did not know about cases and
they have been heard at court and I was found guilty of no insurance. Ø
I have done statutory
declarations at court including my insurance documents and this still has not
corrected anything. Ø
One of the statutory
declarations was again heard at court on the 26/01/2015 which again I
did not know about for Willesden Magistrates' Court. Ø
But I have sent so many emails
to this court with all documents and asked for them to be checked with the
police officer at court to show I was insured to drive. Ø
This has not been done I have
just again been found guilty due to not getting letters of a court hearing
date. Ø
I have now also got a letter of
Indemnity from KGM who I was insured with under policy number MT3574694.
00.01 AM on the 23/2/13 and was in force until Midnight on the 22/2/14
when it lapsed. Ø
Most of the cases are with the
KGM policy you will see the reason as to why in the Letter of Indemnity from
KGM. Ø
I also believe there was one
case for Covea Insurance PLC policy number MT10 021608047 it was not
showing on the MID due to the stop was the day after I took the policy out. Ø
Please can any cases be set
aside and reopened and looked into and any other cases that have been heard
for no insurance under these policies of insurance be addressed. Ø
You will in due cause be
hearing from my solicitor, she is trying to address all the cases, but this
is taking time. Ø
She has seen all the emails I
have sent trying to address these issues and feels more should have been done
as it would have only taken for the insurance policies to be checked and this
would have stopped a waste of time and money for the courts, and myself at
this time she wants to just appeal all cases to the crown court. Ø
Which would again be a waste of
money for the courts and again, of my time. Ø
But this is having an effect on
my life my driving licence has been revoked 3 times for no insurance, Ø
when in fact I have always had
insurance to drive and would not drive if I did not have insurance. Ø Please
see attached documents 653, Ø
Could you get back to me as
soon as possible by way of email, as it does seem there is an issue with my
post and not getting letters that was meant to be sent to me? Ø
I am taking this up with the
royal mail. Regards Simon Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981 This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security cloud
service. For more information, please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ********************************************************************* This e-mail is private and is intended only for the addressee and any
copy recipients. If you are not an intended recipient, please advise the sender
immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a
copy. Activity and use of CPS Connect systems, the Government Secure
Intranet, and the Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to secure their effective
operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using these systems
will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for
other lawful business purposes. ********************************************************************* |
||||
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 522. Jeanette. Reilly
@met.pnn / Page Numbers: 1909 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
19/03/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 522.
Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn / Page Numbers: 1909, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 19 March 2015 09:42 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: PC/6804/13 Dear Lorraine, Ø Further to
our recent telephone conversation please find my contact details attached to
this email. Ø I would
just like to confirm that I will attend your home address on Thursday 26th
March at 1000am to speak to you and your son about his complaint against
police. Ø I will see you
next week but please contact me before this should you have any questions or
concerns. Many thanks Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police
Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State
Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total Policing is the Met's
commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders,
prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you
to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print
this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be
confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
5 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 525. Leslie, Sandra _RE_
Simon Cordell 1403116916 / Page Numbers: 1926,1927,1928,1929 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 |
20/03/2015 |
|
|
|
5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 525. Leslie,
Sandra_ RE_ Simon Cordell 1403116916 / Page Numbers: 1926,1927,1928,1929, From: Leslie, Sandra sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk on behalf of GLBROMLEYMCENQ glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 20 March 2015 14:42 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
1403116916 Good afternoon Mrs Cordell, Ø Thank you
for your email and may to your query I apologise for the delay in replying to
your query. Ø I have
referred your complaint to a Clerk of the court. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 17:38 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Cc: CO16Mailbox. SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk Southcju O' Sullivan Emma Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø I
am writing this email due to many problems with a case that has been ongoing
for no insurance the old case number was 1402647845 the new case
number is 1403116916. Ø The
Problem I have been having is not getting a summon this was the 1st thing so
did not know a court date and was found guilty when I did not know I was due
to attend court. Ø Many
emails have been sent including my insurance I had a list of cases due to an
insurance policy I had with KGM this insurance did not show up on the MID
database and I had my vehicles seized around 9 times when in fact I had paid
for my insurance. Ø Then
this case happened on the 20/5/2014 this was on a new policy with a
new insurance company please see attached insurance document. Ø The
insurance started on the 19/05/2014 and I believe this is why this one
was not showing on the MID on the 20/05/2014 as it was too short a
time. Ø I
have sent many emails to the CPS who do not reply but I do get the read
replies so I know the emails are getting opened the only reason I got the
above emails addresses was due to all the email I was sending to the main CPS
and calls I was making one day I was put though to a manager of traffic CPS
as I was so upset on the phone to what was going on. Ø I
explained all the problems I was having all the calls and emails that were
being sent, her name was Emma O'Sullivan please see attached email. Ø The
only traffic CPS that has replied was from Ø CO16Mailbox.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Ø a
wonderful lady called Sharon Burns. Ø I
have also been sending emails to the court for the above listed case and have
been including my insurance policy, I have been getting replies to my emails
where I was told to file a statutory declaration which I did for this case on
the 02/12/2014 at Highbury Magistrates Court. Ø When
I came out of court, I was told to go to the court office where a lady took
all the papers for the statutory declaration including a copy of my insurance
papers. Ø I
was told I would get a date in the post with a new date hearing. Ø I
have been waiting for the date to come but as of, yet I did not get one for
this case. Ø I
also did not get a date for the other statutory declaration I done on the
same date and that case was heard again on the 26/01/2015 again I was
found guilty and was very upset and just filed an appeal which will be heard
on the 14/05/2015 at Harrow crown court. Ø But
for the Bromley Magistrates' Court case I not had anything. 1927, Ø For
the past 4 weeks I been dealing with a lady called Tracey Bullock
Administrative Officer, Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY due to
the CPS not getting back to me with what was on my driving licence today she
sent me this over Ø Dear
Mr Cordell Ø The
Court case with the offence date of the 20/05/2014 is as follows: ‐ Ø South
East London Magistrates' Court Ø Date
of Conviction – 06/11/2014 Ø Offence
– IN10 Date of Offence – 20/05/2014 Ø Fine
‐ £600 Ø Points
– 6 South East London Magistrates' Court Bromley Magistrates' Court London Road Bromley Kent BR1 1RQ Telephone no ‐ 020
8437 3500 Ø Hope
this information is of help to you Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA
| Swansea | SA99 1AY Now I got very upset as I
knew I had filed the statutory declaration for this case and seeing the
conviction date this was clearly wrong as I had filed the statutory
declaration after this date. I made a call to the court and was told that the
statutory declaration filed in error and was closed, so was never reopened.
The lady I spoke to said she was going to get the file out and get the right
person to call me but give me an update call just to let me know it had been
done. I then got a call from a lady called Donna and while on the phone to
her the other lady called me from the court to say it had been done. I told
her I was on the phone to Donna and she told me that is who I needed to speak
to. I was shocked to hear the lady say to me that the case was heard on the
18/12/2014 and I was found guilty again as I did not turn up, but I
have had no letters so how was I meant to show up when I did not know I
needed to. But this cannot be right as looking at the information DVLA hold
it is the old information to the 1st hearing, as far as I have been told by
the court when a statutory declaration is filed the court would have to
contact DVLA and remove the old conviction they had on file this has not been
done by the court. so how could the case have been heard on the 18/12/2014.
something is really not right here at all as it is all the old information
that DVLA have on file which should have been removed when the statutory
declaration was filed on the 02/12/2014. I would like this case looked
into and set aside and it to be reopened. I would also like the summons sent
to me for this case that was meant to have been sent out to me which I have
never had and the letter of a hearing for the 18/12/2014 could this
please be sent via email to this email address. 1928,1929, |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
21/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/03/2015 |
|
|
|
83. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 83 Emma.O’Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk_03.23.2015_FW Simon Cordell
1403116916 23/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 654 655,656,657,658,659,660 661 1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 526. O'Sullivan Emma _FW_
Simon Cordell 1403116916 / Page Numbers: 1932,1933,1934 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 527. Lorraine Cordell
_Fwd._ Simon Cordell 1403116916 / Page Numbers: 1935,1936,1937,1938 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 528. O'Sullivan Emma _FW_
Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1939,1940,1941,1942 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 529. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1943,1944,1945,1946 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 |
23/03/2015 |
10:15:00 |
X8 654 655,656,657,658, 659,660,661 |
|
|
84. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 84 Emma.O’Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk_03.23.2015_FW Simon Cordell
1403116916_001 23/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 662,663,664,665,666 667,668 |
23/03/2015 |
09:55:00 |
X7 662,663,664,665, 666,667,668 |
|
|
83. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 83 Emma.O’Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk_03.23.2015_FW Simon Cordell
1403116916 23/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 654 655,656,657,658,659,660 661 -- 654, From: O'Sullivan Emma Emma.O'Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 23 March 2015 10:15 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: FW: Simon Cordell
1403116916 Attachments: Insurance-2014-05-20-184559.pdf.
Emma
O'Sullivan-Simon Cordell.pdf Hi Lorraine, Ø Apologies the email address for
the team is below. Ø CO16Mailbox- SouthProsecutionFPN@met.police.uk Ø sent it to the north team in
error but they have confirmed it has been forwarded on to the south team. Kind Regards, Emma O'Sullivan London Traffic Unit Admin Line Manager 02033571604 ’ Rose Court, 4th Floor Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, DX 154263 Southwark 12. From: O'Sullivan Emma Sent: 23 March 2015 09:55 To: CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Cc: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: FW: Simon Cordell
1403116916 Dear South Team, Please see below email. Ø Simon Cordell is waiting for a
date from the court to hear the application to reopen. Ø Please ensure the attached
documents have been placed on file and dealt with once the case has been
relisted. Please could someone kindly ring Lorraine Cordell once her correspondence
has been dealt with - 02 Thank you Emma O'Sullivan London
Traffic Unit Admin Line Manager 02033571604 ’ Rose Court, 4th Floor 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, DX 154263 Southwark 12. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk -- 655,656,657,658,659,660,661, END 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 526. O'Sullivan Emma _FW_ Simon Cordell
1403116916 / Page Numbers: 1932,1933,1934, From: O'Sullivan Emma Emma.O'Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 23 March 2015 09:55 To: CO16Mailbox.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Cc: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: FW: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Attachments: Insurance20140520184559.pdf; Emma
O'SullivanSimonCordell.pdf Dear South Team, Ø Simon Cordell is
waiting for a date from the court to hear the application to reopen. Ø Please ensure the
attached documents have been placed on file and dealt with once the case has
been relisted. Please could someone kindly ring Lorraine Cordell once her
correspondence has been dealt with - 02 Thank you Emma O'Sullivan London
Traffic Unit Admin Line Manager 02033571604 Rose Court, 4th Floor 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, DX 154263 Southwark 12. From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 17:38 To: 'GLBROMLEYMCENQ' Cc: CO16Mailbox. SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk Southcju O' Sullivan Emma Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø I
am writing this email due to many problems with a case that has been ongoing
for no insurance the old case number was 1402647845 the new case
number is 1403116916. Ø The
Problem I have been having is not getting a summon this was the 1st thing so
did not know a court date and was found guilty when I did not know I was due
to attend court. Ø Many
emails have been sent including my insurance I had a list of cases due to an
insurance policy I had with KGM this insurance did not show up on the MID
database and I had my vehicles seized around 9 times when in fact I had paid
for my insurance. Ø Then
this case happened on the 20/5/2014 this was on a new policy with a
new insurance company please see attached insurance document. Ø The
insurance started on the 19/05/2014 and I believe this is why this one
was not showing on the MID on the 20/05/2014 as it was too short a
time. Ø I
have sent many emails to the CPS who do not reply but I do get the read
replies so I know the emails are getting opened the only reason I got the
above emails addresses was due to all the email I was sending to the main CPS
and calls I was making one day I was put though to a manager of traffic CPS
as I was so upset on the phone to what was going on. Ø I
explained all the problems I was having all the calls and emails that were
being sent, her name was Emma O'Sullivan please see attached email. Ø The
only traffic CPS that has replied was from Ø CO16Mailbox.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Ø a
wonderful lady called Sharon Burns. 1933,1934, 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 527. Lorraine
Cordell _Fwd._ Simon Cordell 1403116916 / Page Numbers: 1935,1936,1937,1938, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 23 March 2015 10:02 To: 'CO16Mailbox. SouthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: FW: Simon Cordell
1403116916 Attachments: Insurance20140520184559.pdf; Emma O'SullivanSimonCordell.pdf Ø Please read
below Emails From: O'Sullivan Emma Mail To:Emma.O'Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 23 March 2015 09:55 To: CO16Mailbox. NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Cc: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: FW: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Dear South Team, Ø Simon Cordell is waiting
for a date from the court to hear the application to reopen. Ø Please ensure the
attached documents have been placed on file and dealt with once the case has
been relisted. Please could someone kindly ring Lorraine Cordell once her
correspondence has been dealt with - 02 Thank you Emma O'Sullivan London Traffic Unit Admin Line Manager 02033571604 Rose Court, 4th Floor 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, DX 154263 Southwark 12. From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 17:38 To: 'GLBROMLEYMCENQ' Cc: CO16Mailbox. SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk Southcju O' Sullivan Emma Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø I
am writing this email due to many problems with a case that has been ongoing
for no insurance the old case number was 1402647845 the new case
number is 1403116916. Ø The
Problem I have been having is not getting a summon this was the 1st thing so
did not know a court date and was found guilty when I did not know I was due
to attend court. Ø Many
emails have been sent including my insurance I had a list of cases due to an
insurance policy I had with KGM this insurance did not show up on the MID
database and I had my vehicles seized around 9 times when in fact I had paid
for my insurance. Ø Then
this case happened on the 20/5/2014 this was on a new policy with a
new insurance company please see attached insurance document. Ø The
insurance started on the 19/05/2014 and I believe this is why this one
was not showing on the MID on the 20/05/2014 as it was too short a
time. Ø I
have sent many emails to the CPS who do not reply but I do get the read
replies so I know the emails are getting opened the only reason I got the
above emails addresses was due to all the email I was sending to the main CPS
and calls I was making one day I was put though to a manager of traffic CPS
as I was so upset on the phone to what was going on. Ø I
explained all the problems I was having all the calls and emails that were
being sent, her name was Emma O'Sullivan please see attached email. Ø The
only traffic CPS that has replied was from Ø CO16Mailbox.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Ø a
wonderful lady called Sharon Burns. 1936,1937,1938, 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 528. O'Sullivan Emma _FW_ Simon Cordell
1403116916_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1939,1940,1941,1942, From: O'Sullivan Emma Emma.O'Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 23 March 2015 10:15 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: FW: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Attachments: Insurance20140520184559.pdf; Emma
O'SullivanSimonCordell.pdf Hi Lorraine, Ø Apologies
the email address for the team is below. Ø CO16Mailbox‐ Ø SouthProsecutionFPN@met.police.uk Ø I
sent it to the north team in error, but they have confirmed it has been
forwarded on to the south team. Kind Regards, Emma O'Sullivan London Traffic Unit Admin Line Manager 02033571604 Rose Court, 4th Floor 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, DX 154263 Southwark 12. From: O'Sullivan Emma Sent: 23 March 2015 09:55 To: CO16Mailbox. NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Cc: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: FW: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Dear South Team, Ø Simon Cordell is waiting
for a date from the court to hear the application to reopen. Ø Please ensure the
attached documents have been placed on file and dealt with once the case has
been relisted. Please could someone kindly ring Lorraine Cordell once her
correspondence has been dealt with - 02 Thank you Emma O'Sullivan London Traffic Unit Admin Line Manager 02033571604 Rose Court, 4th Floor 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, DX 154263 Southwark 12. From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 17:38 To:
'GLBROMLEYMCENQ' 1940, Cc: CO16Mailbox.SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk 'Southcju';
O'Sullivan Emma Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø I
am writing this email due to many problems with a case that has been ongoing
for no insurance the old case number was 1402647845 the new case
number is 1403116916. Ø The
Problem I have been having is not getting a summon this was the 1st thing so
did not know a court date and was found guilty when I did not know I was due
to attend court. Ø Many
emails have been sent including my insurance I had a list of cases due to an
insurance policy I had with KGM this insurance did not show up on the MID
database and I had my vehicles seized around 9 times when in fact I had paid
for my insurance. Ø Then
this case happened on the 20/5/2014 this was on a new policy with a
new insurance company please see attached insurance document. Ø The
insurance started on the 19/05/2014 and I believe this is why this one
was not showing on the MID on the 20/05/2014 as it was too short a
time. Ø I
have sent many emails to the CPS who do not reply but I do get the read
replies so I know the emails are getting opened the only reason I got the
above emails addresses was due to all the email I was sending to the main CPS
and calls I was making one day I was put though to a manager of traffic CPS
as I was so upset on the phone to what was going on. Ø I
explained all the problems I was having all the calls and emails that were
being sent, her name was Emma O'Sullivan please see attached email. Ø The
only traffic CPS that has replied was from Ø CO16Mailbox.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Ø a
wonderful lady called Sharon Burns. Ø I
have also been sending emails to the court for the above listed case and have
been including my insurance policy, I have been getting replies to my emails
where I was told to file a statutory declaration which I did for this case on
the 02/12/2014 at Highbury Magistrates Court. Ø When
I came out of court, I was told to go to the court office where a lady took
all the papers for the statutory declaration including a copy of my insurance
papers. Ø I
was told I would get a date in the post with a new date hearing. Ø I
have been waiting for the date to come but as of, yet I did not get one for
this case. Ø I
also did not get a date for the other statutory declaration I done on the
same date and that case was heard again on the 26/01/2015 again I was
found guilty and was very upset and just filed an appeal which will be heard
on the 14/05/2015 at Harrow crown court. Ø But
for the Bromley Magistrates' Court case I not had anything. Ø For
the past 4 weeks I been dealing with a lady called Tracey Bullock
Administrative Officer, Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY due to
the CPS not getting back to me with what was on my driving licence today she
sent me this over Ø Dear
Mr Cordell Ø The
Court case with the offence date of the 20/05/2014 is as follows: ‐ Ø South
East London Magistrates' Court Ø Date
of Conviction – 06/11/2014 Ø Offence
– IN10 Date of Offence – 20/05/2014 Ø Fine
‐ £600 Ø Points
– 6 South East London Magistrates' Court Bromley Magistrates' Court 1941, London Road Bromley Kent BR1 1RQ Telephone no ‐ 020
8437 3500 Hope this information is
of help to you Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA
| Swansea | SA99 1AY Now I got very upset as I
knew I had filed the statutory declaration for this case and seeing the
conviction date this was clearly wrong as I had filed the statutory
declaration after this date. I made a call to the court and was told that the
statutory declaration filed in error and was closed, so was never reopened.
The lady I spoke to said she was going to get the file out and get the right
person to call me but give me an update call just to let me know it had been
done. I then got a call from a lady called Donna and while on the phone to
her the other lady called me from the court to say it had been done. I told
her I was on the phone to Donna and she told me that is who I needed to speak
to. I was shocked to hear the lady say to me that the case was heard on the
18/12/2014 and I was found guilty again as I did not turn up, but I
have had no letters so how was I meant to show up when I did not know I
needed to. But this cannot be right as looking at the information DVLA hold
it is the old information to the 1st hearing, as far as I have been told by
the court when a statutory declaration is filed the court would have to
contact DVLA and remove the old conviction they had on file this has not been
done by the court. so how could the case have been heard on the 18/12/2014.
something is really not right here at all as it is all the old information
that DVLA have on file which should have been removed when the statutory
declaration was filed on the 02/12/2014. I would like this case looked
into and set aside and it to be reopened. I would also like the summons sent
to me for this case that was meant to have been sent out to me which I have
never had and the letter of a hearing for the 18/12/2014 could this
please be sent via email to this email address. Also, if the court is not
willing to deal with this could you please give me the right to appeal to the
crown court and I will file the correct paperwork to the court. Could it also
be made sure that the right CPS get the files and my insurance policy so it
can be checked I was in fact insured. And an update as to what will happen as
it is very upsetting that I am been found guilty for no insurance when in
fact I do pay for my insurance. Regards Lorraine Cordell Simon Cordell 1942, __________________________________________________________________ This email has been
scanned by the Symantec Email Security. Cloud service. For more information,
please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com __________________________________________________________________ ********************************************************************* This email is private and
is intended only for the addressee and any copy recipients. If you are not an
intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply Email and
delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. Activity
and use of CPS Connect systems, the Government Secure Intranet, and the
Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to secure their effective operation
and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using these systems
will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and
for other lawful business purposes. ********************************************************************* 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 529. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (2) / Page Numbers: 1943,1944,1945,1946, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 23 March 2015 16:20 To: 'O'Sullivan Emma' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
1403116916 Dear Emma O'Sullivan Ø Thank you
so much for the help Regards Lorraine Cordell From: O'Sullivan Emma Mail To: Emma.O'Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 23 March 2015 10:15 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: FW: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Hi Lorraine, Ø Apologies
the email address for the team is below. Ø CO16Mailbox‐ Ø SouthProsecutionFPN@met.police.uk Ø I
sent it to the north team in error, but they have confirmed it has been
forwarded on to the south team. Kind Regards, Emma O'Sullivan London Traffic Unit Admin Line Manager 02033571604 Rose Court, 4th Floor 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, DX 154263 Southwark 12. From: O'Sullivan Emma Sent: 23 March 2015 09:55 To: CO16Mailbox.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Cc: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject: FW: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Dear South Team, Ø Simon Cordell is
waiting for a date from the court to hear the application to reopen. Ø Please ensure the
attached documents have been placed on file and dealt with once the case has
been relisted. Please could someone kindly ring Lorraine Cordell once her
correspondence has been dealt with - 02 Thank you Emma O'Sullivan London Traffic Unit Admin Line Manager 02033571604 1944, Rose Court, 4th Floor 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, DX 154263 Southwark 12. From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 17:38 To: 'GLBROMLEYMCENQ' Cc: CO16Mailbox.SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk Southcju';
O'Sullivan Emma Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø I
am writing this email due to many problems with a case that has been ongoing
for no insurance the old case number was 1402647845 the new case
number is 1403116916. Ø The
Problem I have been having is not getting a summon this was the 1st thing so
did not know a court date and was found guilty when I did not know I was due
to attend court. Ø Many
emails have been sent including my insurance I had a list of cases due to an
insurance policy I had with KGM this insurance did not show up on the MID
database and I had my vehicles seized around 9 times when in fact I had paid
for my insurance. Ø Then
this case happened on the 20/5/2014 this was on a new policy with a
new insurance company please see attached insurance document. Ø The
insurance started on the 19/05/2014 and I believe this is why this one
was not showing on the MID on the 20/05/2014 as it was too short a
time. Ø I
have sent many emails to the CPS who do not reply but I do get the read
replies so I know the emails are getting opened the only reason I got the
above emails addresses was due to all the email I was sending to the main CPS
and calls I was making one day I was put though to a manager of traffic CPS
as I was so upset on the phone to what was going on. Ø I
explained all the problems I was having all the calls and emails that were
being sent, her name was Emma O'Sullivan please see attached email. Ø The
only traffic CPS that has replied was from Ø CO16Mailbox.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Ø a
wonderful lady called Sharon Burns. Ø I
have also been sending emails to the court for the above listed case and have
been including my insurance policy, I have been getting replies to my emails
where I was told to file a statutory declaration which I did for this case on
the 02/12/2014 at Highbury Magistrates Court. Ø When
I came out of court, I was told to go to the court office where a lady took
all the papers for the statutory declaration including a copy of my insurance
papers. Ø I
was told I would get a date in the post with a new date hearing. Ø I
have been waiting for the date to come but as of, yet I did not get one for
this case. Ø I
also did not get a date for the other statutory declaration I done on the
same date and that case was heard again on the 26/01/2015 again I was
found guilty and was very upset and just filed an appeal which will be heard
on the 14/05/2015 at Harrow crown court. Ø But
for the Bromley Magistrates' Court case I not had anything. 1927, Ø For
the past 4 weeks I been dealing with a lady called Tracey Bullock
Administrative Officer, Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY due to
the CPS not getting back to me with what was on my driving licence today she
sent me this over Ø Dear
Mr Cordell Ø The
Court case with the offence date of the 20/05/2014 is as follows: ‐ Ø South
East London Magistrates' Court Ø Date
of Conviction – 06/11/2014 Ø Offence
– IN10 Date of Offence – 20/05/2014 Ø Fine
‐ £600 Ø Points
– 6 South East London Magistrates' Court Bromley Magistrates' Court London Road Bromley Kent BR1 1RQ Telephone no ‐ 020
8437 3500 Ø Hope
this information is of help to you Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Dear Mr Cordell The Court case with the
offence date of the 20/05/2014 is as follows: ‐ 1945,1946, 84. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 84 Emma.O’Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk_ 03.23.2015_FW Simon Cordell
1403116916_001 23/03/2015 / Page Numbers: 662,663,664,665,666 667,668 -- 662, From: O'Sullivan Emma Emma.O'Sullivan@cps.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 23 March 2015 09:55 To: CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: FW: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Attachments: Insurance-2014-05-20-184559.pdf. Emma O'Sullivan-Simon Cordell.pdf Dear South Team, Ø Simon Cordell is
waiting for a date from the court to hear the application to reopen. Ø Please ensure the
attached documents have been placed on file and dealt with once the case has
been relisted. Please could someone kindly ring Lorraine Cordell once her
correspondence has been dealt with - 02 Thank you Emma O'Sullivan London Traffic Unit Admin Line Manager 02033571604 ’ Rose Court, 4th Floor 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, DX 154263 Southwark 12. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 17:38 To: 'GL-BROMLEYMCENQ' Cc: CO16Mailbox-.SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk; South-cju'; O'Sullivan Emma Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø I
am writing this email due to many problems with a case that has been ongoing
for no insurance the old case number was 1402647845 the new case
number is 1403116916. Ø The
Problem I have been having is not getting a summon this was the 1st thing so
did not know a court date and was found guilty when I did not know I was due
to attend court. Ø Many
emails have been sent including my insurance I had a list of cases due to an
insurance policy I had with KGM this insurance did not show up on the MID
database and I had my vehicles seized around 9 times when in fact I had paid
for my insurance. Ø Then
this case happened on the 20/5/2014 this was on a new policy with a
new insurance company please see attached insurance document. Ø The
insurance started on the 19/05/2014 and I believe this is why this one
was not showing on the MID on the 20/05/2014 as it was too short a
time. Ø
I have sent many emails to the
CPS -- 663,664,665,666,667,668, |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
24/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
27/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/03/2015 |
|
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 534. Jeanette. Reilly
@met.pnn_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1960,1961 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met Police
/ Kingston Crown Court! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 492. Wood, Peter _Re_
Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (4) / Page Numbers: 1962,1963,1964,1965,1966 Brixton Case / Met Police
/ Kingston Crown Court! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 535. Jeanette. Reilly @met.pnn_ (4) / Page Numbers: 1967,1968,1969,1970 Professional Standard Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
31/03/2015 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 534. Jeanette.
Reilly @met.pnn_ (3) / Page Numbers: 1960,1961, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 31 March 2015 13:09 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Permission to
release court transcript Afternoon Lorraine, Ø I was
informed today that once a transcript has been prepared by the court, they
will send a copy of it to you by email. Ø I'm hoping
to receive this after the Easter weekend. Ø When you
are ready to send the statement, could you please also send me a copy of
Simon's insurance certificate and the emails between the insurance company
and yourself. Many thanks Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation
Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6
1TR From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 26 March 2015 18:57 To: Reilly Jeanette HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Subject: FW: Permission to
release court transcript Dear Jeanette Ø Thank you
for taking the time to come and see us today, Ø as you can
see Simon is not great with the police and finds it very hard due to the many
things that have gone on in his life due to the police and there is very
little trust left for the police with the whole family. Ø I have
forwarded you in a copy of the email giving permission for the court to
release the transcript to you. Could I ask once you get the transcript from
the court would it be possible for us to get a copy of it please could you
let me know if this would be possible or not, if you cannot I will then put a
request into the court myself. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 26 March 2015 17:56 To: 'Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Permission to release court transcript 1961, To Whom It May Concern: Ø Please see
attached document that gives my permission for the transcript to be released
to Jeanette Reilly of the Directorate of Professional Standards. Ø I have
signed the document. Regards Simon Cordell From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Mail To:Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 March 2015 15:26 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Permission to
release court transcript Afternoon Lorraine, Ø As
mentioned earlier I have been trying to obtain a copy of the court transcript
from Kingston Crown Court for Simon's appeal. Ø I have been
advised that if an email is received from Simon stating he gives permission
for the transcript to be sent to me I should be in receipt of it quicker than
applying through the judge. Ø Can Simon
please send an email to margaretwortco@hotmail.co.uk Ø stating
that he gives permission for a copy of the court transcript relating to his
appeal hearing on 5th March 2015
to be released to PC Jeanette Reilly. Ø The email
can come from your email address but needs Simon to sign off with his name
and clearly state he gives his permission for this request. Thank you for your help Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation
Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6
1TR Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We
are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our
environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 492. Wood, Peter _Re_ Appeal against conviction
for no insurance Regina v_ (4) / Page Numbers: 1962,1963,1964,1965,1966, From: Wood, Peter Sent: 31 March 2015 09:25 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Hello Lorraine, Ø I
trust you and Simon are well. Ø I
was wondering if you could update me on what’s been happening please? Ø I
would like to make sure there is nothing else we can do and of course to
bring this matter to a conclusion if we can. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of
Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 11 February 2015 12:45 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Hi Peter Ø
Thank you so much for all your
help, and I hope you have a wonderful holiday. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com Sent: 11 February 2015 11:40 To: Lorraine Cordell; Josephine Ward Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Hello, Ø Please
find attached signed statement as requested. Ø The
original is in the post to the Burncroft Ave address. Ø If
you need anything else please ask Andy in my absence. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of
Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk
| www.canopius.com 1963, From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 10 February 2015 18:07 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Peter Ø
Sorry for the late reply yes
Josephine Ward has said this is fine and can be signed off. Ø
thank you for all the help in
this matter. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
holiday. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter Mail To: Peter.Wood@canopius.com Sent: 10 February 2015 16:38 To: Josephine Ward; Wood, Peter Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Good Afternoon, Ø
Please can I have your
confirmation that the draft section 9 statement is acceptable asap? Ø
If I do not hear back by 11.30
tomorrow, Ø
I will have to assume it is and
sign it off and send out as I will be in meetings and on holiday after that
time. Thanks Pete Wood From: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com Date: 9 February 2015 11:29:00
GMT To: Josephine Ward <josie@michaelcarrollandco.com Cc: Austin,
Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Ms Ward, Ø
I have drafted a section 9
statement as requested. Before I sign it off can you review it and confirm it
satisfies all of your requirements please? Ø
As soon as you do so I will
sign it off, scan a copy over to you and put the original in the post. Ø
Let me know if you need anything
else and of course if you need me to amend the attached in any way. Lorraine/Andy – FYI. Regards 1964, Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of
Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Josephine Ward Mail To:josie@michaelcarrollandco.com Sent: 08 February 2015 19:02 To: Wood, Peter; Austin, Andrew Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina
v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015
at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Mr Wood Ø
I have been instructed by Mr
Simon Paul Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell to assist in the appeal against
conviction that is due to be heard at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court on 5th
March 2015 at 10am. Ø
Miss Cordell has played two
recordings that she received from KGM which are pertinent to the appeal but
at present as the telephone recordings have not been produced as an exhibit
by KGM they will not be admissible at court. Can you therefore please
write a section 9 statement confirming that:
1965,
Yours faithfully MICHAEL CARROLL & CO. Confidentiality Caution
The information in this email and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you
are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify the
sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of emails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use or other lawful
business purposes. Email sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius
Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed representative
of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered
number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by
Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in
England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this email and
in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy this message and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may
monitor the content of emails sent and received via its network for viruses,
unauthorised use or other lawful business purposes. Email sent for and on
behalf of a member of Canopius Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK
Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited |
registered number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential Regulation
Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential
Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number
02473672 | appointed representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is
a brand name for business written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Registered office: Gallery 9, One
Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales 1966, Confidentiality Caution
The information in this email and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you
are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify the
sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of emails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use or other lawful
business purposes. Email sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number
04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius
Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed representative
of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered
number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by
Canopius Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in
England and Wales 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 535. Jeanette.
Reilly @met.pnn_ (4) / Page Numbers: 1967,1968,1969,1970, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 31 March 2015 13:46 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Permission to
release court transcript Lorraine, Ø Please ignore my request for Simon's insurance and the
communication between the insurance company and yourself, Ø I already
have that information. Ø I am just
awaiting the statement. Ø Please be
advised that I am on a course next week and then back in the office on 14th
April. Many thanks Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious
Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional
Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6
1TR From: Reilly Jeanette HQ Directorate of
Professional Standards Sent: 31 March 2015 13:09 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Permission to release court transcript Afternoon Lorraine, Ø I
was informed today that once a transcript has been prepared by the court,
they will send a copy of it to you by email. Ø I'm
hoping to receive this after the Easter weekend. Ø When
you are ready to send the statement, could you please also send me a copy of
Simon's insurance certificate and the emails between the insurance company
and yourself. Many thanks Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police
Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor,
Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 1968, From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 26 March 2015 18:57 To: Reilly Jeanette HQ Directorate of
Professional Standards Subject: FW: Permission to release court transcript Dear Jeanette Ø Thank
you for taking the time to come and see us today, Ø as
you can see Simon is not great with the police and finds it very hard due to
the many things that have gone on in his life due to the police and there is
very little trust left for the police with the whole family. Ø I
have forwarded you in a copy of the email giving permission for the court to
release the transcript to you. Could I ask once you get the transcript from
the court would it be possible for us to get a copy of it please could you
let me know if this would be possible or not, if you cannot I will then put a
request into the court myself. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 26 March 2015 17:56 To: 'Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Permission to release court transcript To Whom It May Concern: Ø Please
see attached document that gives my permission for the transcript to be
released to Jeanette Reilly of the Directorate of Professional Standards. Ø I
have signed the document. Regards Simon Cordell From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Mail To: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 March 2015 15:26 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Permission to release court transcript Afternoon Lorraine, Ø As
mentioned earlier I have been trying to obtain a copy of the court transcript
from Kingston Crown Court for Simon's appeal. Ø I
have been advised that if an email is received from Simon stating he gives
permission for the transcript to be sent to me I should be in receipt of it
quicker than applying through the judge. Ø Can
Simon please send an email to margaretwortco@hotmail.co.uk Ø stating
that he gives permission for a copy of the court transcript relating to his
appeal hearing on 5th March 2015
to be released to PC Jeanette Reilly. Ø The
email can come from your email address but needs Simon to sign off with his
name and clearly state he gives his permission for this request. Thank you for your help Jeanette 1969, Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable
| Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State
Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total Policing is the
Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch
offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working
with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not
print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to
copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify
the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to
conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts
no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on
the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and
support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make our capital
safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to
copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify
the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to
conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts
no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook:
Facebook.com/metpolice.uk 1970, Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
Simulation April
2015 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
April
2015 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
85. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 85 Peter.Wood@canopius.com_04.01.2015_RE Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Reg 01/04/2015 / Page Numbers: 669,670,671,672 673,674 1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 536. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976 Brixton Case / Met Police
/ Kingston Crown Court! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 537. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v / Page Numbers: 1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983 Brixton Case / Met Police
/ Kingston Crown Court! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 538. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1984,1985,1986,1987 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 539. GL-BROMLEYMCENQ_RE_
Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1988,1989 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 |
01/04/2015 |
16:02:00 |
X6 669,670,671,672 673,674 |
|
|
85. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 85 Peter.Wood@canopius.com_04.01.2015_RE Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Reg 01/04/2015 / Page Numbers: 669,670,671,672 673,674 -- 669, From: Wood, Peter Sent: 01 April 2015 16:02 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no
insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Hi Lorraine, Ø Fantastic
holiday thanks, really great time, went by far too quickly and now it’s back
to normal, took me a while to get my head back in the game I must say. Ø I
didn’t realise there was more than 1 court case! Ø This
is going to take some time to sort out but I’m glad to hear you got the right
result on the recent case. Ø I
guess all I can say for the moment is let me know how things go and of course
I will respond again after I have received and considered details of the
Police stops/vehicle seizures we are waiting on. Ø All
the best. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 01 April 2015 15:00 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no
insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court Dear Peter Ø Thank
you for the email and I hope you had a great holiday. Ø I
am waiting for the police compound to get back to us with the data for the
seizers, but they just take so long with everything. Ø There
are still court cases for no insurance that are still ongoing there are 2
left where Simon did not get any summons form the court and was found guilty
due to not knowing. Ø One
is due to be heard in May 2015 and we are waiting for the last date. Ø DVLA
have now taken of the ban on the 18/03/2015 so the insurance my son
has been paying for the last year and could not be used due to this can now
be used as he can drive now. Ø But
there is still the 12 points on his licence due to the other 2 court cases
for no insurance DVLA do know the 12 points should not be on there in fact
they have also been in contact with the courts they are not happy, but they
cannot remove the points until the cases are heard in court. Ø But
an update to what happened in court case were the police officer lied was
Simon won the case and the judge was very upset at the police officer and put
notes that it needed addressing. Ø The
complaint is ongoing with the police office that lied, at this time that may take
some time as the police officer may be charged. Ø We
won't know fully until the Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit Directorate
of Professional Standards completes their investigation into what the police
officer did and what the crown court judge said as the judge knows he lied to
2 judges and Simon was found guilty when he had done nothing wrong. Ø We
had a meeting about this on the 26/03/2015 but the person dealing with
this is waiting for the crown court documents as to what the judge said, we
should have the court transcript from Kingston Crown Court just after the
Easter holidays. Ø I
will keep you updated as to the data you need it’s just waiting for it from
the police compound as requests had to be made for the data, 670, Simon
did try to get the information without the requests, but the police was not
having it, so the request had to be put in for it. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter mailto: Peter.Wood@canopius.com Sent: 31 March 2015 09:25 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no
insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court Hello Lorraine, Ø I
trust you and Simon are well. Ø I
was wondering if you could update me on what’s been happening please? Ø I
would like to make sure there is nothing else we can do and of course to
bring this matter to a conclusion if we can. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 11 February 2015 12:45 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no
insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court Hi Peter Ø
Thank you so much for all your
help, and I hope you have a wonderful holiday. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter [mailto: Peter.Wood@canopius.com Sent: 11 February 2015 11:40 To: Lorraine Cordell; Josephine Ward (josie@michaelcarrollandco.com) Cc: Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no
insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court Hello, Ø Please
find attached signed statement as requested. Ø The
original is in the post to the Burncroft Ave address. Ø If
you need anything else please ask Andy in my absence. Regards 671, Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 10 February 2015 18:07 To: Wood, Peter Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no
insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court Dear Peter Ø
Sorry for the late reply yes
Josephine Ward has said this is fine and can be signed off. Ø
thank you for all the help in
this matter. Ø
I hope you have a great time on
holiday. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter [mailto: Peter.Wood@canopius.com Sent: 10 February 2015 16:38 To: Josephine Ward; Wood, Peter Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Austin, Andrew Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no
insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court Good Afternoon, Ø
Please can I have your
confirmation that the draft section 9 statement is acceptable asap? Ø
If I do not hear back by 11.30
tomorrow, Ø
I will have to assume it is and
sign it off and send out as I will be in meetings and on holiday after that
time. Thanks Pete Wood From: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com> Date: 9 February 2015 11:29:00 GMT To: Josephine Ward Josie@michaelcarrollandco.com Cc: Austin, Andrew Andrew.Austin@canopius.com Subject: RE: Appeal
against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March
2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Ms Ward, Ø
I have drafted a section 9
statement as requested. Before I sign it off can you review it and confirm it
satisfies all of your requirements please? Ø
As soon as you do so I will
sign it off, scan a copy over to you and put the original in the post. Ø
Let me know if you need
anything else and of course if you need me to amend the attached in any way. Lorraine/Andy - FYI. Regards 672, Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations Manager | UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com From: Josephine Ward [mailto: Josie@michaelcarroHandco.com Sent: 08 February 2015 19:02 To: Wood, Peter; Austin, Andrew Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Appeal against conviction for no
insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon
Thames Crown Court Dear Mr Wood Ø
I have been instructed by Mr
Simon Paul Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell to assist in the appeal against
conviction that is due to be heard at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court on 5th
March 2015 at 10am. Ø
Miss Cordell has played two
recordings that she received from KGM which are pertinent to the appeal but
at present as the telephone recordings have not been produced as an exhibit
by KGM they will not be admissible at court. Can you therefore please
write a section 9 statement confirming that:
673, Yours faithfully MICHAEL CARROLL & CO. Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited
| registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius
Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited
| registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius
Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales PROUD SPONSOR of TRAIL LONDON 25 MAY 28 MAR 674, Confidentiality Caution The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited
| registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius
Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales PROUD SPONSOR of LONDON TRAIL 28 MAR - 25 MAY CITY SUPPORTING IN HOSPITALS ® Shaun 1he Streep is a registered trademark of Aardman Ammaliens Ltd. Grand Anneal / Aardman A Gromits, Children's Charily Reg. LC4J&G1. AH rights res-c The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and notify
the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of e-mails sent and
received via its network for viruses, unauthorised use, or other lawful
business purposes. E-mail sent for and on behalf of a member of Canopius
Group, which includes: Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520 Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 |
Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the
Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed
representative of Canopius Managing Agents Limited Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994 KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius
Managing Agents Limited Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street,
London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and Wales END 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 536. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Regina v_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1971,1972,1973,1974,1975,1976, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 01 April 2015 15:00 To: 'Wood, Peter' Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Dear Peter Ø Thank
you for the email and I hope you had a great holiday. Ø I
am waiting for the police compound to get back to us with the data for the
seizers, but they just take so long with everything. Ø There
are still court cases for no insurance that are still ongoing there are 2
left where Simon did not get any summons form the court and was found guilty
due to not knowing. Ø One
is due to be heard in May 2015 and we are waiting for the last date. Ø DVLA
have now taken of the ban on the 18/03/2015 so the insurance my son
has been paying for the last year and could not be used due to this can now
be used as he can drive now. Ø But
there is still the 12 points on his licence due to the other 2 court cases
for no insurance DVLA do know the 12 points should not be on there in fact they
have also been in contact with the courts they are not happy, but they cannot
remove the points until the cases are heard in court. Ø But
an update to what happened in court case were the police officer lied was
Simon won the case and the judge was very upset at the police officer and put
notes that it needed addressing. Ø The
complaint is ongoing with the police office that lied, at this time that may
take some time as the police officer may be charged. Ø We
won't know fully until the Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit Directorate
of Professional Standards completes their investigation into what the police
officer did and what the crown court judge said as the judge knows he lied to
2 judges and Simon was found guilty when he had done nothing wrong. Ø We
had a meeting about this on the 26/03/2015 but the person dealing with
this is waiting for the crown court documents as to what the judge said, we
should have the court transcript from Kingston Crown Court just after the
Easter holidays. Ø I
will keep you updated as to the data you need it’s just waiting for it from
the police compound as requests had to be made for the data, Simon did try to get the information without the requests, but the
police were not having it, so the request had to be put in for it. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter Mail To:Peter.Wood@canopius.com Sent: 31 March 2015 09:25 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Hello Lorraine, Ø I
trust you and Simon are well. Ø I
was wondering if you could update me on what’s been happening please? Ø I
would like to make sure there is nothing else we can do and of course to
bring this matter to a conclusion if we can. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of
Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk
| www.canopius.com 1972,1973,1974,1975,1976, 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 537. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v / Page Numbers: 1977,1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 01 April 2015 17:01 To: 'Wood, Peter' Subject: RE: Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown
Court Hi peter Ø Great to
hear you had a good holiday and yes, it is hard to get back into things once
you come back from holiday. Ø I was
thinking you was aware there were more than one case, there was 1 were the
police officer lied, but then due to all the seizers for no insurance I think
there was 5 cases where we did not get the summons they went to court and he
was found guilty for no insurance as he did not know. Ø We have
been dealing with these cases for a while with the courts. Ø The ones we
got the summons for was all fine. Ø To me it is
silly the way in which the system works it's a waste of tax payer's money, as
you would think when he went to the police compound, they would note he did
in fact have insurance and then that would be it but nope. Ø 2 have been
a nightmare to deal with as the courts did not send dates out the number of
emails, I have sent is a joke I have even had to put complaints into the
court which really, I should have not needed to do. Ø When I had
to get the solicitors involved with the one was the police officer lied, she
had to attend my home to get all the data for it. Ø I showed
her about the other cases and all the emails she could not believe her eyes
and what we were going through she is helping me with the last 2 cases. Ø It really
has been a nightmare you would never want to have to deal with this. Simon
Driving licence is in a mess that's why I had to get DVLA involved. Ø And the
worst part is he was insured did nothing wrong but due to the MID database
error has had so many problems I think the worst part is not being able to
drive and knowing you should be able to and having to pay for insurance you can’t even use, not being able to work
due to needing to be able to drive. Regards Lorraine From: Wood, Peter Mail To: Peter.Wood@canopius.com Sent: 01 April 2015 16:02 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul
Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court Hi Lorraine, Ø Fantastic
holiday thanks, really great time, went by far too quickly and now it’s back
to normal, took me a while to get my head back in the game I must say. Ø I
didn’t realise there was more than 1 court case! Ø This
is going to take some time to sort out but I’m glad to hear you got the right
result on the recent case. Ø I
guess all I can say for the moment is let me know how things go and of course
I will respond again after I have received and considered details of the
Police stops/vehicle seizures we are waiting on. Ø All
the best. Regards Peter Wood UK Specialty Operations
Manager | UK Specialty Division of
Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood
Close | London | E18 1RZ D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk
| www.canopius.com 1978,1979,1980,1981,1982,1983, 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 538. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1984,1985,1986,1987, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 01 April 2015 17:13 To: 'GLBROMLEYMCENQ' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
1403116916 Dear Miss S E Leslie Ø I still
have not had any update to this case could you please get back to me with
what is going on as I would like to get this addressed. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra Mail To: sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk On Behalf Of
GLBROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 20 March 2015 14:42 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Good afternoon Mrs
Cordell, Ø Thank
you for your email and may to your query I apologise for the delay in
replying to your query. Ø I
have referred your complaint to a Clerk of the court. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 17:38 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Cc: CO16Mailbox. SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk Southcju';
'O'Sullivan Emma' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 To Whom It May Concern: Ø I
am writing this email due to many problems with a case that has been ongoing
for no insurance the old case number was 1402647845 the new case
number is 1403116916. Ø The
Problem I have been having is not getting a summon this was the 1st thing so
did not know a court date and was found guilty when I did not know I was due
to attend court. Ø Many
emails have been sent including my insurance I had a list of cases due to an
insurance policy I had with KGM this insurance did not show up on the MID
database and I had my vehicles seized around 9 times when in fact I had paid
for my insurance. Ø Then
this case happened on the 20/5/2014 this was on a new policy with a
new insurance company please see attached insurance document. Ø The
insurance started on the 19/05/2014 and I believe this is why this one
was not showing on the MID on the 20/05/2014 as it was too short a
time. Ø I
have sent many emails to the CPS who do not reply but I do get the read
replies so I know the emails are getting opened the only reason I got the
above emails addresses was due to all the email I was sending to the main CPS
and calls I was making one day I was put though to a manager of traffic CPS
as I was so upset on the phone to what was going on. Ø I
explained all the problems I was having all the calls and emails that were
being sent, her name was Emma O'Sullivan please see attached email. Ø The
only 1985,1986,1987, 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 539. GL-BROMLEYMCENQ_RE_
Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1988,1989, From: GLBROMLEYMCENQ glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 01 April 2015 17:19 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
1403116916 Ø This is an automatically generated message
acknowledging your recent E Mail to the Customer Service Team. Please note a full reply will only be sent if appropriate. Please DO
NOT re‐submit your enquiry by E Mail, fax or letter as duplicates
create unnecessary paperwork and delays. CONTACT DETAILS FOR BROMLEY ADMINISTRATION CENTRE
(for Bromley, Bexley and Greenwich Magistrates Courts) as follows: Telephone: 020 8437 3500 or
020 8437 3585 Gold fax: 0870
324 0223 E Mail: GL‐BromleyMCSummons@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for ongoing summons case enquiries) GL‐BromleyMCEnq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for all concluded case enquiries) GL‐BromleyMCList@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for ongoing charge case & Legal Aid enquiries) SEGroupResultingEnquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for Court result enquiries) Other useful E Mail contacts: GL‐CAO.CORRESPOND@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for all fines enquiries) Enquiries@bromley.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk (for Civil Proceeding enquiries) Thank you, Customer Service Team This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies
and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure medium.
Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else.
Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response
to this message by email. This email (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content
may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The original of
this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning 1989, service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. |
||||
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 540. Leslie, Sandra_ RE_
Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1990,1991,1992,1993,1994 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 541. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell 1403116916 / Page Numbers: 1995,1996,1997,1998,1999 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 542. GL-BROMLEYMCENQ_RE_
Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (2) / Page Numbers: 2000,2001 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 |
02/04/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 540. Leslie,
Sandra_ RE_ Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (1) / Page Numbers: 1990,1991,1992,1993,1994, From: Leslie, Sandra sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk on behalf of GLBROMLEYMCENQ glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 02 April 2015 11:03 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
1403116916 Morning Mrs Cordell, Ø I have
received a decision from the Clerk he has advised that the case be put in
court as an application to be reopened Mr Cordell will be sent a date in due
course to attend, Ø I apologise
for the delay. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 01 April 2015 17:13 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Dear Miss S E Leslie Ø I
still have not had any update to this case could you please get back to me
with what is going on as I would like to get this addressed. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra Mail To: sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk On Behalf Of
GLBROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 20 March 2015 14:42 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Good afternoon Mrs
Cordell, Ø Thank you for your email and may to your query I
apologise for the delay in replying to your query. Ø I have referred your complaint to a Clerk of the
court. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 March 2015 17:38 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Cc: CO16Mailbox. SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk 'Southcju';
'O'Sullivan Emma' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 To Whom It May Concern: Complaint Ø I
am writing this email due to many problems with a case that has been ongoing
for no insurance the old case number was 1402647845 the new case number is
1403116916. Ø The
Problem I have been having is not getting a summon this was the 1st thing so
did not know a court date 1991,1992,1993,1994, 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 541. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell 1403116916 / Page Numbers: 1995,1996,1997,1998,1999, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 02 April 2015 17:18 To: 'GLBROMLEYMCENQ' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
1403116916 Dear Miss S E Leslie Ø Could you
please keep me updated as to when the new date will be via this email as it
does seem that we are not getting letters, Ø and I do
not want to miss a next court date due to this. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra Mail To: sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk On Behalf Of
GLBROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 02 April 2015 11:04 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Morning Mrs Cordell, Ø I
have received a decision from the Clerk he has advised that the case be put
in court as an application to be reopened Mr Cordell will be sent a date in
due course to attend, Ø I
apologise for the delay. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 01 April 2015 17:13 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Dear Miss S E Leslie Ø I
still have not had any update to this case could you please get back to me
with what is going on as I would like to get this addressed. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra Mail To: sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk On Behalf Of
GLBROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 20 March 2015 14:42 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Good afternoon Mrs
Cordell, Ø Thank you for your email and may to your query I
apologise for the delay in replying to your query. Ø I have referred your complaint to a Clerk of the
court. Regards Miss S E Leslie From:
Lorraine
Cordell Mail
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk 1996,1997,1998,1999, 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 542.
GL-BROMLEYMCENQ_RE_ Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (2) / Page Numbers: 2000,2001, From: GLBROMLEYMCENQ glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 02 April 2015 17:19 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
1403116916 Ø This is an automatically generated message
acknowledging your recent E Mail to the Customer Service Team. Ø Please note a full reply will only be sent if
appropriate. Ø Please DO NOT re‐submit your enquiry by
E Mail, fax or letter as duplicates create unnecessary paperwork and delays. CONTACT DETAILS FOR BROMLEY ADMINISTRATION CENTRE
(for Bromley, Bexley and Greenwich Magistrates Courts) as follows: Telephone: 020 8437 3500 or
020 8437 3585 Gold fax: 0870 324 0223 E Mail: GL‐BromleyMCSummons@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for ongoing summons case enquiries) GL‐BromleyMCEnq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for all concluded case enquiries) GL‐BromleyMCList@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for ongoing charge case & Legal Aid enquiries) SEGroupResultingEnquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for Court result enquiries) Other useful E Mail contacts: GL‐CAO.CORRESPOND@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk (for all fines enquiries) Enquiries@bromley.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk (for Civil Proceeding enquiries) Thank you, Customer Service Team This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies
and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure medium.
Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else.
Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response
to this message by email. This email (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content
may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The original of
this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning 2001, service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. |
||||
|
|
|
03/04/2015 |
|
|
|
86. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 86 sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_04.02.2015_RE Simon Cordell
1403116916 04/04/2015 / Page Numbers: 675,676,677,678 1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 543. Leslie, Sandra_ RE_
Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (2) / Page Numbers: 2002,2003,2004,2005, 2006,2007 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 |
04/04/2015 |
11:04:00 |
X4 675,676,677,678 |
|
|
86. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 86 sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_04.02.2015_RE Simon Cordell
1403116916 04/04/2015 02/04/2015 / Page Numbers: 675,676,677,678 -- 675, From: Leslie, Sandra <sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> on behalf of GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 02 April 2015 11:04 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Morning Mrs Cordell, Ø I
have received a decision from the Clerk he has advised that the case be put
in court as an application to be reopened Mr Cordell will be sent a date in
due course to attend, Ø I
apologise for the delay. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 01 April 2015 17:13 To: GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Dear Miss S E Leslie Ø I
still have not had any update to this case could you please get back to me
with what is going on as I would like to get this addressed. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra [mailto:sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk] On Behalf Of GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 20 March 2015 14:42 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Good afternoon Mrs Cordell, Ø Thank you for your email and may to your query I
apologise for the delay in replying to your query. Ø I have referred your complaint to a Clerk of the
court. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 18 March 2015 17:38 To: GL-BROMLEYMCENQ Cc: CO16Mailbox-.SouthProsecutionFN@met.pnn.police.uk Southcju'; 'O'Sullivan Emma' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 To Whom It May Concern: Complaint I am writing this email due to many problems with a case that has been
ongoing for no insurance the old case number was 1402647845 the new case
number is 1403116916. The Problem I have been having is not getting a summon this was the
1st thing so did not know a court date and was found guilty 676, when I did not know I was due to attend court. Many emails have been sent including my insurance I had a list of
cases due to an insurance policy I had with KGM this insurance did not show
up on the MID database and I had my vehicles seized around 9 times when in
fact I had paid for my insurance. Then this case happened on the 20/5/2014 this was on a new policy with
a new insurance company please see attached insurance document. The insurance
started on the 19/05/2014 and I believe this is why this one was not showing
on the MID on the 20/05/2014 as it was too short a time. I have sent many emails to the CPS who do not reply but I do get the
read replies so I know the emails are getting opened the only reason I got the
above emails addresses was due to all the email I was sending to the main CPS
and calls I was making one day I was put though to a manager of traffic CPS
as I was so upset on the phone to what was going on. I explained all the
problems I was having all the calls and emails that were being sent, her name
was Emma O'Sullivan please see attached email. The only traffic CPS that have
replied was from CO16Mailbox-.NorthProsecutionFPN@met.pnn.police.uk a wonderful lady called Sharon Burns. I have also been sending emails to the court for the above listed case
and have been including my insurance policy, I have been getting replies to
my emails where I was told to file a statutory declaration which I did for
this case on the 02/12/2014 at Highbury Magistrates Court. When I came out of court, I was told to go to the court office where a
lady took all the papers for the statutory declaration including a copy of my
insurance papers. I was told I would get a date in the post with a new date
hearing. I have been waiting for the date to come but as of, yet I did not
get one for this case. I also did not get a date for the other statutory declaration I done
on the same date and that case was heard again on the 26/01/2015 again I was
found guilty and was very upset and just filed an appeal which will be heard
on the 14/05/2015 at Harrow crown court. But for the Bromley Magistrates' Court case I not had anything. For the past 4 weeks I been dealing with a lady called Tracey Bullock
Administrative Officer, Court Casework1 D9 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY due to
the CPS not getting back to me with what was on my driving licence. today she
sent me this over Dear Mr Cordell The Court case with the offence date of the 20/05/2014 is as follows:
- South East London Magistrates' Court Date of Conviction - 06/11/2014 Offence - IN10 Date of Offence - 20/05/2014 Fine - £600 Points - 6 South East London Magistrates' Court Bromley Magistrates' Court London
Road Bromley Kent BR1 1RQ Telephone no - 020 8437 3500 Hope this information is of help to you Tracey Bullock Administrative Officer Court Casework lD9 | DVLA | Swansea | SA99 1AY 677, Now I got very upset as I knew I had filed the statutory declaration
for this case and seeing the conviction date this was clearly wrong as I had
filed the statutory declaration after this date. I made a call to the court
and was told that the statutory declaration filed in error and was closed, so
was never reopened. The lady I spoke to said she was going to get the file
out and get the right person to call me but give me an update call just to
let me know it had been done. I then got a call from a lady called Donna and while on the phone to
her the other lady called me from the court to say it had been done. I told
her I was on the phone to Donna and she told me that is who I needed to speak
to. I was shocked to hear the lady say to me that the case was heard on
the 18/12/2014 and I was found guilty again as I did not turn up, but I have
had no letters so how I was meant to show up when I did not know I needed to.
But this cannot be right as looking at the information DVLA hold it is the
old information to the 1st hearing, as far as I have been told by the court
when a statutory declaration is filed the court would have to contact DVLA
and remove the old conviction they had on file this has not been done by the
court. so how could the case have been heard on the 18/12/2014. something is
really not right here at all as it is all the old information that DVLA have
on file which should have been removed when the statutory declaration was
filed on the 02/12/2014. I would like this case looked into and set aside and it to be
reopened. I would also like the summons sent to me for this case that was meant
to have been sent out to me which I have never had and the letter of a
hearing for the 18/12/2014 could this please be sent via email to this email
address. Also, if the court is not willing to deal with this could you please
give me the right to appeal to the crown court and I will file the correct
paperwork to the court. Could it also be made sure that the right CPS get the files and my
insurance policy so it can be checked I was in fact insured. And an update as to what will happen as it is very upsetting that I am
been found guilty for no insurance when in fact I do pay for my insurance. Regards Lorraine Cordell Simon Cordell This email was scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please
call your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 678, This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. This email was scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with
Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please
call your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure,
storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient,
please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply
to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear
that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail
content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for
viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. END 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 543. Leslie, Sandra
_ RE_ Simon Cordell 1403116916_ (2) / Page Numbers: 2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007, From: Leslie, Sandra sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk on behalf of GLBROMLEYMCENQ glbromleymcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 04 April 2015 09:07 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
1403116916 Morning Lorraine, Ø We will
keep you updated. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 02 April 2015 17:18 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Dear Miss S E Leslie Ø Could
you please keep me updated as to when the new date will be via this email as
it does seem that we are not getting letters, Ø and
I do not want to miss a next court date due to this. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra Mail To: sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk On Behalf Of
GLBROMLEYMCENQ Sent: 02 April 2015 11:04 To: 'Lorraine Cordell' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Morning Mrs Cordell, Ø I
have received a decision from the Clerk he has advised that the case be put
in court as an application to be reopened Mr Cordell will be sent a date in
due course to attend, Ø I
apologise for the delay. Regards Miss S E Leslie From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 01 April 2015 17:13 To: GLBROMLEYMCENQ Subject: RE: Simon Cordell 1403116916 Dear Miss S E Leslie Ø I
still have not had any update to this case could you please get back to me
with what is going on as I would like to get this addressed. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Leslie, Sandra Mail To: sandra.leslie@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk On Behalf Of
GLBROMLEYMCEN 2003,2004,2005,2006,2007, The banging
Started! Debbie Andrews
(responsible) Stain Curtis
(responsible) Mathiyalagan
(Responsible) Time: All-Day and All-Night whenever
they knew that I was indoors! I gave the correct
department the true facts so that I could not get misunderstood of my
innocents towards the claimed accusations of my explained truths, without the
correct follow ups taking place! The Enfield Homes
and the Enfield Council staff aloud the tenants of 117 and 113 and 111
Continued to victimizing me by 117 Burncroft
Avenue and 113 keep on continually, reiterating to flushing the toilet when I
am in the bathtub! 113 and 117 woke me
up by assailing me intentionally by stamping and dropping articles above my
head in my front room and all other living rooms! Slamming the main,
communal ingress door closed! Victimizing me with
intent of using the same repeated items of the building fixtures such as
slamming on and off the water taps to have tortures effects on me within my
rented home is unfair living circumstances! Disrepair! Treating me and
others equal and within the legal framework of the Enfield Councils and the
Enfield Homes stationery duties is a must but by their staff neglecting the
damp and heating inclusive of the sound proofing issues continues to happen
to me and is a breach of them policies of conditions and regulations! Time Spent
Building. In the background
of everything going I continued working on creating a new and up to date
event Electrical Systems Policy and I continued to Study and finish at the
Time Start: 07:00 Am and Time End: 03:30 Pm! My mother also
continues to work on building my company website for me with others at the
Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00! Working at Home
doing Court Case Defence Work! I spent time and
resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my defence case,
against the allegations getting put against me at the Time Start: 12:00 Am
and Time End: 06:00 Am! |
||||
|
|
|
05/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 544. Jeanette. Reilly
@met.pnn_ (5) / Page Numbers: 2008,2009,2010,2011,2012 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 545. Jeanette. Reilly
@met.pnn_ (6) / Page Numbers: 2013 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
09/04/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 544. Jeanette.
Reilly @met.pnn_ (5) / Page Numbers: 2008,2009,2010,2011,2012, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 09 April 2015 07:12 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Permission to release court transcript Morning Lorraine, Ø Can you
please advise when you think the statement will be ready? Ø In the
meantime, can Simon please confirm the following are the areas of complaint
he wishes to be investigated:
Ø Once the
heads of complaint have been agreed I can establish which officer/s are
involved in each part and investigate accordingly. Many thanks Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation
Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6
1TR From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 March 2015 15:41 To: Reilly Jeanette
HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Subject: RE: Permission to
release court transcript Dear Jeanette Thank you for the update, the statement will be ready in the next few
days to send to you it's taken me longer as I was busy dealing with something
due to my late mothers’ death, as its going to inquest review and we were
only given 5 weeks to get everything in order. There are a lot of emails that
was going back and forward to the insurance company since 2013 about
this issue, and I do mean a lot as I was trying to get the information from
them. Will you need all the emails or just the ones from after Simon was
found guilty as that was when I went to the Financial Ombudsman and put a
complaint in, this was when the insurance company started to deal with getting
me the information needed. Not sure why you would need all the emails as it
has already been proven Simon was insured. And was insured on the date of the
14/11/2013, yes, the police officer tried to make his insurance void
by saying about the tools. But that was corrected when Kelly Tiller got the
call from the police compound on the 26/11/2013. I'm sure I gave you
the Letters of Indemnity from KGM to confirm he was insured. Yes, many hours
have gone into proving Simon was innocent by ways of emails trying to get the
data and audio from them for the courts. 2009,2010,2011,2012, 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 545. Jeanette.
Reilly @met.pnn_ (6) / Page Numbers: 2013, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 09 April 2015 18:25 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: complaint Afternoon Lorraine, Ø From reading through your initial complaint
letter again, I note you have included the contents of an email response from
Broadsure Direct on 22/11/2013.
Ø This email
starts with, "please find response from your insurers. Ø I have
listened to the call that took place between the police and my colleague
Jessica advising Mr Cordell was carrying tools in his vehicle ………… Ø Can you
please forward me a copy of this email so I can show the senders details and
time date etc. Many thanks Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police
Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State
Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total Policing is the Met's commitment
to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent
crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make
our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email
unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments
may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are
intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
|
10/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 547. Jeanette. Reilly
@met.pnn_ (7) / Page Numbers: 2020 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 2 I won the
Bromley Court Case at the Bromley
Court House, No Driving Ban after! Broadsure Insurance
/ KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Bromley Court –
011401009802 |
22/04/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 547. Jeanette.
Reilly @met.pnn_ (7) / Page Numbers: 2020, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 22 April 2015 14:47 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: PC/6804/13 Afternoon Lorraine, Ø I sent you
an email on 9th April requesting an update with the statement and to obtain a
copy of an email from the insurance companies. Ø I also
requested confirmation regarding the areas of complaint Simon wishes to be
investigated. Ø To date I
have not received a response from you. Ø I need to
proceed with the investigation so can I please ask that you send the completed
statement and confirmation of areas of complaint to me no later than 29th
April 2015. Ø If I have
not received any further information from you by this date, I will conduct my
investigation on the information already available to me. Many thanks for your assistance Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation
Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6
1TR Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We
are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our
environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk 2 The Bromley Case for No Insurance and I won this case as to Insurance. |
||||
|
|
|
23/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
27/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 548. Jeanette. Reilly @met.pnn_ (8) / Page Numbers: 2021,2022,2023 Professional Standard Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
28/04/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 548. Jeanette.
Reilly @met.pnn_ (8) / Page Numbers: 2021,2022,2023, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 28 April 2015 11:03 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Attachments: Simon Cordell
KingstonProceedings0503 15.pdf Lorraine, Ø Please find
attached a copy of the Crown Court Transcript. Ø I spoke to
Becky at Margaret Wort & Co and she advised me I could send this through
to you. Ø If it asks
you for a password each time you try to open the document it is: MWCO2013
(if this doesn't work in upper case letters, try lower case) Many thanks Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation
Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6
1TR From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 28 April 2015 10:41 To: Reilly Jeanette HQ Directorate of Professional
Standards Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jeanette Ø I am sorry
I have not been in contact with Simon Statement but as said in an earlier
email we heard from the coroner office and they are doing an inquest review
on the 30/04/2015 which was very short notice to get everything ready
for this hearing, as said I been dealing with getting all my late mothers
files in order to be able to deal with this which has taken me some time, I
am still chancing her bloods and other things and as this means a lot to the
whole family due to the way my late mother passed away my time has been spent
dealing with this. Ø We have had
to wait since 2013 for this complaint to even be looked at and my son
has had to suffer the wait until he proved what the police had done. Ø There is a
number of issues with this complaint we want addressed which you know, I do
not feel it was correct of you to pre write Simon statement and think he
would just sign it when he had not even talked to you about the complaint. Ø If you had
wished you could have taken a statement from him in the meeting which would
have taken some hours but you choose not to do this, I am sure a person is
meant to be there when a statement is taken by the police as it has to be
what they have said. Ø I am also
still waiting for an email from the crown court with the transcript which you said the crown court
would send to my email, can you tell me if you have been sent this yet also. Ø If you have not got this is there any update
to this. Ø The statement is ready I spent the last few
days writing it up when I should have been dealing with issues related to my
late mother, I should have that over to you today or tomorrow in the morning.
Ø I am just waiting for Simon to say everything
is correct in it and then he will sign it. 2022, Ø Could you please let me know you have this
email and that you will in fact wait till you get the statement before
handing this over? Ø I am very busy as I still have not got everything
done for the inquest review and only have a few days in order to get anything
done for this also. Regards Lorraine From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Mail To:Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 22 April 2015 14:47 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: PC/6804/13 Afternoon Lorraine, Ø I
sent you an email on 9th April requesting an update with the statement and to
obtain a copy of an email from the insurance companies. Ø I
also requested confirmation regarding the areas of complaint Simon wishes to
be investigated. Ø To
date I have not received a response from you. Ø I
need to proceed with the investigation so can I please ask that you send the
completed statement and confirmation of areas of complaint to me no later
than 29th April 2015. Ø If
I have not received any further information from you by this date, I will
conduct my investigation on the information already available to me. Many thanks for your
assistance Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police
Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State
Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total Policing is the
Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch
offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working
with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not
print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to
copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify
the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to
conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts
no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: 2023, Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total Policing is the
Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch
offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working
with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not
print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright
and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you
must not distribute or copy the information in this email without the
permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the
extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be
read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude
any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no
responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter:
@metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
|
29/04/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/04/2015 |
|
|
Simulation May
2015 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
May
2015 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 549. Simon Cordell _Fwd._
Confirmation of Vehicle Tax / Page Numbers: 2030 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
02/05/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 549. Simon Cordell
_Fwd._ Confirmation of Vehicle Tax / Page Numbers: 2030, From: Simon Cordell Sent: 02 May 2015 14:32 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: FW: Confirmation of
Vehicle Tax Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 14:24:55 +0100 From: donotreply.evl@dvla.gsi.gov.uk To: crompton_killer@hotmail.co.uk Subject: Confirmation of
Vehicle Tax THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL ‐ PLEASE DO NOT
REPLY AS EMAILS RECEIVED AT THIS ADDRESS CANNOT BE RESPONDED TO. Confirmation of vehicle tax. Ø Thank you
for using DVLA Vehicle Licensing Online. Ø Your application
for vehicle tax has been successful. Ø Vehicle Registration Number: MA57LDY Reference Number: 9139 4850
2625 5420 Application Made On:
02/05/2015 14:21:15 Vehicle Tax Period: 6
months Vehicle Tax Amount Paid:
GBP 99.00 Last 4 Digits of Payment Card:
**** **** **** 5019 The law has changed, you do
not need to display a tax disc, therefore we will not issue one to you. You may
wish to save or print this email confirmation for your records. The original
of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
03/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/05/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 551. Jeanette. Reilly
@met.pnn_ (9) / Page Numbers: 2032,2033,2034,2035 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
05/05/2015 |
|
||
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 551. Jeanette.
Reilly @met.pnn_ (9) / Page Numbers: 2032,2033,2034,2035, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 05 May 2015 17:19 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Afternoon Lorraine, Ø Many thanks
for the statement. Ø I am
currently trying to arrange an interview date with PC Geoghegan and obtain
some more information from other officers mentioned. Ø I will
update you as soon as I can. Many thanks Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation
Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6
1TR From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 05 May 2015 15:20 To: Reilly Jeanette HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jeanette Ø Thank you
for the email below and sending the Crown Court Transcript over. Ø Please see
attached statement. Regards Lorraine From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk [Mail To:Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 28 April 2015 11:03 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Lorraine, Ø Please
find attached a copy of the Crown Court Transcript. Ø I
spoke to Becky at Margaret Wort & Co and she advised me I could send this
through to you. Ø If
it asks you for a password each time you try to open the document it is: MWCO2013
(if this doesn't work in upper case letters, try lower case) Many thanks Jeanette 2033,2034,2035, |
||||
|
|
06/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/05/2015 |
|
|
|
87. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 87 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_05.11.2015_FW RE CPS Letter
for Appeal-Case Simon 11/05/2015 / Page Numbers: 679,680 1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 552. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ CPS Letter for Appeal-Case Simon /
Page Numbers: 2036 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 553. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._
RE_ CPS Letter for Appeal-Case Simon /
Page Numbers: 2037 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
11/05/2015 |
15:17:00 |
X2 679,680 |
|
|
87. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 87 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_05.11.2015_FW RE CPS Letter
for Appeal-Case Simon 11/05/2015 / Page Numbers: 679,680 -- 679, From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: 11 May 2015 15:17 To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD' Subject: FW: RE: CPS
Letter for Appeal-Case Simon Attachments: CPS-for-Appeal.pdf Dear Josey Ø Please see attached letter from CPS I made a mistake the other day
thinking it was the court. Ø But how funny after me sending Simon insurance to them about 100 and
them finding him guilty 3 times at Willesden mag court they are now saying oh
you have insurance we will not be opposing the Appeal. Ø What a waste of money and time. Ø I should think this will mean Simon does not need to attend court
thank god but I will call the court to check I just called them and they say
he will still need to attend can you check if that is correct for me please. Regards Lorraine 680,
End of Picture! 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 552. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ CPS Letter for
Appeal-Case Simon / Page Numbers: 2036, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 11 May 2015 15:10 To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD' Subject: RE: CPS Letter for Appeal Case Simon Attachments: CPSforAppeal.pdf Dear Josie Ø
Please
see attached letter from CPS I made a mistake the other day thinking it was
the court. Ø
But
how funny after me sending Simon insurance to them about 100 and them finding
him guilty 3 times at Willesden mag court they are now saying oh you have
insurance we will not be opposing the Appeal. Ø
What
a waste of money and time. Ø
I
should think this will mean Simon does not need to attend court thank god but
I will call the court to check I just called them and they say he will still
need to attend can you check if that is correct for me please. Regards Lorraine 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 553. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ RE_ CPS Letter for
Appeal-Case Simon / Page Numbers: 2037, From:
Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 11 May 2015 15:17 To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD' Subject: FW: RE: CPS Letter for Appeal Case Simon Attachments: CPSforAppeal.pdf Dear Josey Ø
Please
see attached letter from CPS I made a mistake the other day thinking it was
the court. Ø
But
how funny after me sending Simon insurance to them about 100 and them finding
him guilty 3 times at Willesden mag court they are now saying oh you have
insurance we will not be opposing the Appeal. Ø
What
a waste of money and time. Ø
I
should think this will mean Simon does not need to attend court thank god but
I will call the court to check I just called them and they say he will still
need to attend can you check if that is correct for me please. Regards Lorraine |
||||
|
|
|
12/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
2 ·
Working on the Court Case Defence Willesden court case Driving! Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Willesden Harrow magistrates! |
14/05/2015 |
|
|
|
2 Working on the Court Case Defence Willesden court case Driving! 14/05/2015 -- Appeal hearing at Harrow
Crown Court for the No Insurance Case Willesden I did not need to
attend, due to all the emails sent to the CPS who accepted them as I had
insurance and I won the appeal. |
||||
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 554. James Wing _REF_
00-COSX14MT07-ID_87_ Open Attach Documents / Page Numbers: 2038 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
15/05/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 554. James Wing _REF_
00-COSX14MT07-ID_87_ Open Attach Documents / Page Numbers: 2038, From: James Wing [jameswing@broadsuredirect.com] Sent: 15 May 2015 14:17 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: REF:
00COSX14MT07ID< 87> Open Attach Documents Attachments: S Cordell track and trace page._JW_.pdf Lorraine, As discussed, track and trace
page attached. Kind Regards, James Wing Administration Department t: 01843 594477 f: 01843 594488 Broadsure Direct Telephone number: 01843 594477 Fax Number: 01843 594488 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This e‐mail transmission
is strictly confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation
to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential
information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy,
distribute, or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this e‐mail
in error, please reply to the sender as soon as possible and delete the message.
Please note that we are able to, and reserve the right to, monitor e‐mail
communications passing through our network. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Broadsure Direct Is
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. |
||||
|
|
|
16/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
89. Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 89 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_05.19.2015_Re Simon Cordell 05/05/2015 / Page Numbers: 683,684 1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 555. GL-BRENTMCENQ_RE_
Simon Cordell_ (2) / Page Numbers: 2039 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brent! 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 556. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (6) / Page Numbers: 2040 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Brent! |
19/05/2015 |
|
|
|
89. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 89 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_05.19.2015_Re Simon Cordell 05/05/2015 19/05/2015 / Page Numbers: 683,684 -- 683, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 19 May 2015 17:13 To: enquiries@harrow.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk GL-BrentMCenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk LCCCCollectionUnit@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: Won-Appeal.pdf To Whom It May Concern: Ø I am writing this email due to a
case for using a vehicle without insurance that was heard at Harrow Crown
Court on the 14 May 2015 Ø Case Number A20150049 the appeal against conviction
was allowed. Ø Please see attached document from
the court Ø When I was found guilty for this
case at Willesden Magistrates' Court the case numbers were 011403134612
and the old case number to that was 011401596899. Ø When I was found guilty at
Willesden Magistrates' Court, I was given
Ø I am not sure who is to address
the points being removed from my driving licence and the Victim surcharge £60.00
therefore could someone please explain if I need to do anything for this. Ø Also, the fine of £600.00 the
court arranged this to be taken out of my benefits each week. this is still
being taken out I have today made a call to find out what I can do to get
this stopped to Willesden court and got cut of the phone. Ø Also, I called the fines people
up who are collecting this fine and it is still being collected. Ø Could someone please get the fine
to be stopped being taken out of my benefits and also the money they have
collected from this fine which I believe started in Aug 2014 to be
paid back to me. Ø I am not sure even how it would
be paid back to me as it has been taken direct from my benefit which has made
me suffer when I did nothing wrong and did in fact have insurance, could
someone get back to me if I need to deal with anything to get this fine
stopped being taken and also the money that has been taken paid back to me. Mr Simon Cordell 109
Burncroft Ave Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ DOB: 26/01/1981 Regards Simon Cordell 684,
End of picture! 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 555.
GL-BRENTMCENQ_RE_ Simon Cordell_ (2) / Page Numbers: 2039, From: GLBRENTMCENQ Sent: 19 May 2015 17:13 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject: RE: Simon Cordell ! THIS MAILBOX
IS NOW CLOSED! Ø Your email has
been redirected to our new email address; LondonNorthwestMC@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Ø Please use
the London Northwest MC mailbox for all future correspondence. Ø Thank you. This email (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are
not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender
by return email. Internet email is not a secure medium. Any reply to this
message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that
in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by
email. This email (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored,
recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Email monitoring / blocking
software may be used, and email content may be read at any time. You have a
responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding
emails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses
by the Government Secure Internet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone
in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This
email has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 556. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (6) / Page Numbers: 2040, From:
Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 19 May 2015 17:13 To: 'enquiries@harrow.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk LCCCCollectionUnit@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Re: Simon Cordell Attachments: WonAppeal.pdf To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this email due to a case for using a vehicle without
insurance that was heard at Harrow Crown Court on the 14 May 2015 Case Number A20150049 the appeal against conviction was allowed. Please see attached document from the court When I was found guilty for this case at Willesden Magistrates'
Court the case numbers were 011403134612 and the old case
number to that was 011401596899. When I was found guilty at Willesden Magistrates' Court, I was given
I am not sure who is to address the points being removed from my
driving licence and the Victim surcharge £60.00 therefore could
someone please explain if I need to do anything for this. Also, the fine of £600.00 the court arranged this to be taken
out of my benefits each week. this is still being taken out I have today made
a call to find out what I can do to get this stopped to Willesden court and
got cut of the phone. Also, I called the fines people up who are collecting this fine and it
is still being collected. Could someone please get the fine to be stopped being taken out of my
benefits and also the money they have collected from this fine which I
believe started in Aug 2014 to be paid back to me. I am not sure even how it would be paid back to me as it has been
taken direct from my benefit which has made me suffer when I did nothing
wrong and did in fact have insurance, could someone get back to me if I need
to deal with anything to get this fine stopped being taken and also the money
that has been taken paid back to me. Mr Simon Cordell 109 Burncroft Ave Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ DOB: 26/01/1981 Regards Simon Cordell |
||||
|
90. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 90 enquiries@harrow.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk_05.20.2015_FW
Simon Cordell 20/05/2015 / Page Numbers: 685,686,687,688 1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 557. Jeanette. Reilly
@met.pnn_ (10) / Page Numbers: 2041 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 558. Harrow Crown, Enquiries _FW_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 2042,2043,2044 Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! Harrow Crown / Willesden Magistrates Court! |
20/05/2015 |
13:03:00 |
X4 685,686,687,688 |
|
|
90. Additional Email
Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 90 enquiries@harrow.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk_05.20.2015_FW
Simon Cordell 20/05/2015 / Page Numbers: 685,686,687,688 -- 685, From: Harrow Crown, Enquiries enquines@harrow.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 20 May 2015 13:03 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: GL-BRENTMCENQ. LCCC Collection Unit. LCCC Enforcement Unit. LCCC Compliance Unit Subject: FW: Simon Cordell Attachments: Won-Appeal.pdf Hello Mr Cordell Ø Your email has been forwarded to
Willesden Magistrates Court. Ø When an appeal is finished, the
results go back to Magistrates Court and they are supposed to send
notification to London Collection and Compliance Centre and stop the payment
of fine etc. Ø Please contact them to get this
amended. Regards Bharti Shah Harrow Crown
Court 020 8424 2294 e-mail - bharti.shah@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk TO ENABLE US TO DEAL PROMPTLY
WITH YOUR ENQUIRY, PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE CASE
NUMBER / INDICTMENT NUMBER IS QUOTED IN ALL COMMUNICATIONS AND URGENT EMAILS
ARE MARKED WITH "HIGH PRIORITY". COMMUNICATION SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO THIS COURT VIA ONLY ONE MEANS OF CONTACT AND TO ONLY ONE EMAIL
ADDRESS. PLEASE REFRAIN FROM COPYING IT TO ADDITIONAL EMAIL ADDRESSES,
FACSIMILE AND POST. From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 19 May 2015 17:13 To: Harrow Crown, Enquiries GL-BRENTMCENQ LCCC Collection Unit Subject: Re: Simon Cordell To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am writing this email due to a case for using a
vehicle without insurance that was heard at Harrow Crown Court on the 14
May 2015 Ø Case Number A20150049 the appeal against
conviction was allowed. Ø Please see attached
document from the court Ø When I was found guilty
for this case at Willesden Magistrates' Court the case numbers were
011403134612 and the old case number to that was 011401596899. Ø When I was found guilty
at Willesden Magistrates' Court, I was given
I am not sure who is to address the points being removed from my
driving licence and the Victim surcharge £60.00 therefore could
someone - 686, - Ø please explain if I
need to do anything for this. Ø Also, the fine of
£600.00 the court arranged this to be taken out of my benefits each week.
this is still being taken out I have today made a call to find out what I can
do to get this stopped to Willesden court and got cut of the phone. Ø Also, I called the
fines people up who are collecting this fine and it is still being collected. Ø Could someone please
get the fine to be stopped being taken out of my benefits and also the money
they have collected from this fine which I believe started in Aug 2014 to
be paid back to me. Ø I am not sure even how
it would be paid back to me as it has been taken direct from my benefit which
has made me suffer when I did nothing wrong and did in fact have insurance,
could someone get back to me if I need to deal with anything to get this fine
stopped being taken and also the money that has been taken paid back to me. Mr Simon Cordell 109 Burncroft Ave Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ DOB:
26/01/1981 Regards Simon Cordell This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisations IT
Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is
not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded, and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at
any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by 687, Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via
the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. 688,
End of Picture! 1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 557. Jeanette.
Reilly @met.pnn_ (10) / Page Numbers: 2041, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 20 May 2015 10:11 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: PC/6804/13 Morning Lorraine, Ø
I hope you are well. Ø
Just to update you that I am looking to
conduct an interview with PC Geoghegan next week. Ø
Following the interview, I will be able
to decide whether any further information is required before completing an
outcome for Simon's areas of complaint. Ø
If you have any questions, please do not
hesitate to contact me. Many thanks Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police
Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 | Telephone
020 7161 2253 | | Fax 020 7161 6798 | Email Address Empress State
Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total Policing is the Met's
commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders,
prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you
to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print
this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments
may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are
intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received
this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the
information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication
systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email
and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel
are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by
email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached
with other employees or agents. The security of this email and any
attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but
malicious software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 558. Harrow Crown, Enquiries _FW_ Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 2042,2043,2044, From: Harrow Crown, Enquiries [enquiries@harrow.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 20 May 2015 13:03 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Cc: GLBRENTMCENQ; LCCC Collection Unit LCCC Enforcement Unit LCCC Compliance Unit Subject: FW: Simon Cordell Attachments: Won Appeal.pdf Hello Mr Cordell Ø
Your email has been forwarded
to Willesden Magistrates Court. Ø
When an appeal is finished, the
results go back to Magistrates Court and they are supposed to send
notification to London Collection and Compliance Centre and stop the payment
of fine etc. Ø
Please contact them to get this
amended. Regards Bharti Shah Harrow Crown Court 020 8424 2294 e-mail - bharti.shah@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk TO ENABLE US TO DEAL
PROMPTLY WITH YOUR ENQUIRY, PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE CASE NUMBER / INDICTMENT
NUMBER IS QUOTED IN ALL COMMUNICATIONS AND URGENT EMAILS ARE MARKED WITH
"HIGH PRIORITY". COMMUNICATION SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THIS COURT VIA
ONLY ONE MEANS OF CONTACT AND TO ONLY ONE EMAIL ADDRESS. PLEASE REFRAIN FROM
COPYING IT TO ADDITIONAL EMAIL ADDRESSES, FACSIMILE AND POST. From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 19 May 2015 17:13 To: Harrow Crown, Enquiries; GLBRENTMCENQ; LCCC Collection Unit Subject: Re: Simon Cordell To Whom It May Concern: Ø
I am writing this email due to
a case for using a vehicle without insurance that was heard at Harrow Crown
Court on the 14 May 2015 Ø
Case Number A20150049
the appeal against conviction was allowed. Ø
Please see attached document
from the court When I was found guilty for this case at Willesden
Magistrates' Court the case numbers were 011403134612 and the old case
number to that was 011401596899. Ø
When I was found guilty at
Willesden Magistrates' Court, I was given Fine £600.00 Victim surcharge
£60.00 Ø
Licence endorsed: Ø
6 penalty points Ø
I am not sure who is to address
the points being removed from my driving licence and the Victim surcharge
£60.00 therefore could someone please explain if I need to do anything for
this. 2043, Ø
Also, the fine of £600.00 the court
arranged this to be taken out of my benefits each week. this is still being
taken out I have today made a call to find out what I can do to get this
stopped to Willesden court and got cut of the phone. Ø
Also, I called the fines people
up who are collecting this fine and it is still being collected. Ø
Could someone please get the
fine to be stopped being taken out of my benefits and also the money they
have collected from this fine which I believe started in Aug 2014 to be
paid back to me. Ø
I am not sure even how it would
be paid back to me as it has been taken direct from my benefit which has made
me suffer when I did nothing wrong and did in fact have insurance, could
someone get back to me if I need to deal with anything to get this fine
stopped being taken and also the money that has been taken paid back to me. Mr Simon Cordell 109 Burncroft Ave Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ DOB: 26/01/1981 Regards Simon Cordell This email was scanned by
the Government Secure Intranet antivirus service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of
problems, please call your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the
GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes. This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention
of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is
not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is not a secure
medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone
else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in
response to this message by email. This email (whether you are the sender or
the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of
Justice. Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content
may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents. 2044, The original of this
email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. |
||||
|
|
|
21/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
27/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/05/2015 |
|
|
|
|
Diary done up to here for sure! |
31/05/2015 |
|
|
Simulation June
2015 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
June
2015 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 560. Jeanette. Reilly
@met.pnn_ (11) / Page Numbers: 2047 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
01/06/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 560. Jeanette.
Reilly @met.pnn_ (11) / Page Numbers: 2047, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 01 June 2015 08:11 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: PC/6804/13 Morning Lorraine, Ø I hope you are well. Ø
I just wanted to let you know that due to
Aid commitments I was unable to interview PC Geoghegan last week as planned. Ø
I am on leave from 11th June 29th June
and will have to reschedule the interview for after this time. Ø
I apologise for this delay and assure you
that I will conduct the interview as soon as I can following my return. Regards Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable
| Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State
Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total Policing is the Met's
commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent
crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make
our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email
unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
|
02/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
06/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 564. Jeanette. Reilly
@met.pnn_ (12) / Page Numbers: 2062 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
10/06/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 564. Jeanette. Reilly @met.pnn_ (12) / Page Numbers: 2062, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 10 June 2015 18:11 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: complaint Afternoon Lorraine, Ø
As
mentioned in a previous
email I sent to you, Ø
I had to postpone PC Geoghegan's
interview date due to work commitments. Ø
I am now on leave until June 29th
but will endeavour to conduct the interview as soon as I can on my return.
Apologies for the delay. Regards Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation
Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6
1TR Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make
our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email
unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to
copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify
the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to
conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts
no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
11/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/06/2015 |
|
|
|
91. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 91 William.Slade@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_06.18.2015_Simon Cordell
22.07.13 Waltham Forest MC 18/06/2015 / Page Numbers: 689,690 691,692,693,694,695,696 697 |
18/06/2015 |
16:28:00 |
X9 689,690 691,692,693,694, 695,696,697 |
|
|
91. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 91 William.Slade@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk_06.18.2015_Simon Cordell
22.07.13 Waltham Forest MC 18/06/2015 / Page Numbers: 689,690 691,692,693,694,695,696 697 -- 689, From: Slade, William William.Slade@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> on behalf of
London East MC <LondonEastMC@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk> Sent: 18 June 2015 16:28 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Simon Cordell
22.07.13 Waltham Forest MC Attachments: Cordell.pdf Good Afternoon Lorraine, Ø Following our conversation
earlier today, please find attached details relating to your sons’ case to
assist you in making a Statutory Declaration. Ø If your son decides to attend
court to make the declaration your sons local magistrates court is Tottenham
MC and the details are : https://courttribunalfinder.service.gov.uk/courts/tottenham-magistrates-court-formerlyenfield-magistrates-court?aol=All&postcode=en3%207jq Ø Your sons case number is
1301713036 and it was heard at Waltham Forest MC on 22/07/2013. Ø I hope you and your son are able
to get to the bottom of this matter. Kind Regards William Thames CSU This e-mail (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you
are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the
sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a
secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by
someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material
in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are
the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the
Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and
e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure
laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email
was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. 690, Simon Cordell 22.07.13 Waltham Forest MC Cordell MG4E CHARGE(S) Ø
On 05/02/2013
at Burncroft Avenue EN3 7JQ having been required by or on behalf of the Chief
Officer of Police for METROPOLIS, failed to give information relating to the
identification of the driver of a vehicle, namely a FORD(EUROPE) VRM MA57LDY,
who was alleged to have been guilty of an offence. Ø
Contrary to section
172(3) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 and Schedule 2 of the Road Traffic
Offenders Act 1988 [This offence carries penalty
points.] [Statement of facts] Ø
A brief statement of
the case is set out below. Ø
This statement may
be used as a summary of the prosecution case if you plead guilty. Ø
On 05/02/2013 the
defendant having been required by or on behalf of Police for METROPOLIS
failed to give information relating to the identification of the driver of a
vehicle, namely ’ Ø
FORD(EUROPE) VRM
MA57LDY, who was alleged to have been guilty of an offence Ø
If you are convicted
the Prosecution in this case will apply to the court for costs in the sum of
£85.00 Ø
Charge Authorised by
Niki Manson for the Metropolitan Police Prosecution contact details: Ø
Metropolitan Police,
Camera Offences Prosecution Section, PO Box 510 DA15 0BQ Ø
Date: Thursday, 20 June 2013 Post FTC 691,
End of Picture! 692,
End of Picture! 693,
End of Picture! 694,
End of Picture! 695,
End of Picture! 696,
End of Picture! 697,
End of Picture! |
||||
|
|
|
19/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
27/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/06/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/06/2015 |
|
|
Simulation July
2015 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
July
2015 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
06/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 568. Jeanette. Reilly @met.pnn_
(13) / Page Numbers: 2072 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
20/07/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 568. Jeanette. Reilly
@met.pnn_ (13) / Page Numbers: 2072, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 20 July 2015 16:08 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Complaint Afternoon Lorraine, Ø I hope you are well. Ø
I would like to update you that PC
Geoghegan has been interviewed regarding the complaints. Ø
I am now in possession of all the
required paperwork needed to complete my investigation. Ø
I will endeavour to complete my final
outcome report and then submit this to my Chief Inspector for a final
decision. Regards Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable
| Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State
Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total Policing is the Met's
commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders,
prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you
to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print
this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the
information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
|
21/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/07/2015 |
|
|
|
24/07/2015 |
|
|||
|
|
|
24/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/07/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/07/2015 |
|
|
Simulation August 2015
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
August
2015 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
06/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 575. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Simon Cordell _ (1) / Page Numbers: 2091 Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
18/08/2015 |
|
|
|
4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 575. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell _ (1) / Page Numbers: 2091, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 18 August 2015 17:20 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Dear martin Ø I hope you
are doing well I did call last week as I knew Simon insurance is due
for renewal and asked for his no claims to be sent to this email which we have not got could you
please send it over ASAP please. Regards Lorraine |
||||
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 576. Je an et te. Re ill y @ met. pan_
(14) / Page Numbers: 2092 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
19/08/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 576. Jeanette.
Reilly @met.pnn_ (14) / Page Numbers: 2092, From: Je
an et te.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 19 August 2015 08:46 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: complaint Morning Lorraine, Ø Just a quick message to advise that I am in the process of completing a final
report regarding your complaints. Ø
I will endeavour to complete this as soon
as possible. Ø
Please be advised that I am on leave from
September 2nd 21st. Regards Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police
Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State
Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total Policing is the
Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch
offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make
our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email
unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
20/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
28/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/08/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/08/2015 |
|
|
Simulation September 2015
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
September
2015 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
06/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/09/2015 |
|
|
|
92. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 92 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_09.18.2015_RE Simon Cordell 18/09/2015 / Page Numbers: 698,699 |
18/09/2015 |
15:00:00 |
X2 698,699 |
|
|
92. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 92 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_09.18.2015_RE Simon Cordell 18/09/2015 / Page Numbers: 698,699 -- 698, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 18 September 2015
15:00 To: benedicta.odjida@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Attachments: Court-List-From-Benedicta.pdf Dear Benedicta Odjida Mr Simon Paul Cordell DOB
26/01/1981 Ø
I am writing this
Email due to some work you curry out in February/March 2014 in regard to
looking up records that are on my PNC record. Ø There was a list that took some time for you to go over, and then my mother Lorraine
Cordell came to the court to pick them up once you had looked every up. Ø Since this time, we have been
trying to get this addressed as there were a number that was not in the court
record, you gave my mother a printout that you had done with stars on the
ones that was not in the courts register, please see attached document. Ø Since this time, we have been
dealing with Flo at Highbury Corner court to get a letter done by you to say
you did in fact look at the court register and did not find these records on
the court register. Ø
My Mother and I have sent many emails to Highbury Corner
Court and have gone to the court and spoke with Flo and we see to not be able
to get this issue addressed. Ø
Therefore, my mother
came to Enfield court on the 15/09/2015 to see if she could speak to you, but
you were on leave so she asked for your direct email, I am writing this email
directly to you to see if this issue can be addressed and a letter written
saying you looked at the courts registers and did not find the ones marked on
the list you gave my mother. Ø
As it seems the
printout you gave her is not enough and it does need a court headed letter to
show in fact the work that you carried out looking into my data the court
holds. Ø
Could you please
look into this issue and let me know if a court headed letter can be made up
and if so, my mother Lorraine Cordell could come to the court and pick it up,
if you could let me know by replying to this email, I would be most grateful. Regards Simon Cordell 699
End of Picture! |
||||
|
|
|
19/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 590. Jeanette. Reilly
@met.pnn_ (15) / Page Numbers: 2140 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
21/09/2015 |
|
|
|
4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 590. Jeanette.
Reilly @met.pnn_ (15) / Page Numbers: 2140, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 21 September 2015 15:13 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Complaint Good afternoon Lorraine, Ø Due to having just returned to work from
annual leave and my current workload I have not yet completed my outcome
report regarding Simon's complaints. Ø I am working my way through the points of
complaint and will endeavour to complete my report as soon as possible. Ø Thank you for your continued patience. Regards Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation
Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State
Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total Policing is the
Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch
offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working
with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not
print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and
are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
|
22/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
28/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/09/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/09/2015 |
|
|
Simulation October 2015
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
October
2015 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
06/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 1 x Emails Sarah Jenkins @ broadsuredirect.com Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank /
Canopius! |
07/10/2015 |
|
|
|
1 1 x Emails Date: Wednesday, 7 October 2015, 9:39 Subject: Documents From: Sarah Jenkins sarah jenkins@broadsuredirect.com Good Morning Simon,
Ø
I
am currently, still looking into this for you, I will be in contact,
shortly. Kind Regards Sarah Jenkins |
||||
|
|
|
08/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 605. Jeanette. Reilly
@met.pnn_ (16) / Page Numbers: 2214,2215,2216 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
19/10/2015 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 605. Jeanette.
Reilly @met.pnn_ (16) / Page Numbers: 2214,2215,2216, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 19 October 2015 07:24 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Complaint Good morning Lorraine, Ø
I have completed the final outcome report
regarding this complaint, and this will be sent to my Chief Inspector to be
ratified. Ø
Hopefully I will be able to update you
will a formal outcome within a few weeks. Many thanks Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious
Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional
Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6
1TR From: Lorraine Cordell Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 16 October 2015 12:25 To: Reilly Jeanette
HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Subject: RE: Complaint Dear Jeanette Reilly, Ø Is there an update to how long this will
take regarding the complaint, will it be weeks or months? Ø As you are aware this has been ongoing since
Dec 2013 when this started, yes, we know that the trial took some time
and then the appeal, and that you could only start to address this from that
point and we do understand this. Regards Simon Cordell Lorraine Cordell From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Mail To: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 21 September 2015 15:13 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Complaint Good afternoon Lorraine, Ø
Due to having just returned to
work from annual leave and my current workload I have not yet completed my
outcome report regarding Simon's complaints. 2215,2216, |
||||
|
93. ·
Additional Email Attachments & Emails /
Issue: 1. 93 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_10.20.2015_RE SIMON CORDELL 20/10/2015 / Page Numbers: 700,701 |
20/10/2015 |
17:48:00 |
X2 700,701 |
|
|
93. Additional
Email Attachments & Emails / Issue: 1. 93 lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_10.20.2015_RE SIMON CORDELL 20/10/2015 / Page Numbers: 700,701 -- 700, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 20 October 2015
17:48 To: 'Forster, John Subject: RE: SIMON CORDELL Dear Mr Dear Forster Ø Could you please put this email in front of the legal adviser, the
alleged erroneous entries on my PNC as you have put it, are made up from the court as the
police would not be able to put records on a person’s PNC record without a
case being put in front of the courts. Ø My Mother has asked the court to
check all the registries at the court against the records the police hold on
my PNC record. Ø This showed the errors and as you
said to my mother at the court if a case is not listed at the court then it
was never heard at the court. Ø There are 5 errors of no listing
on my PNC that the court does not have in the court register how can this be? Ø My mother has been to the police
who do not want to address this issue this is why she came to the court as
the court should hold all records. Ø
By the legal adviser not wanting to write a letter showing my records have been checked by the
court what is this saying. why should a person be able to ask the court to
check their records, yet the court does not want to get involved in errors
they found? Ø
This is a
miscarriage of justice; the court has not found records in the court
registries that are on my PNC record, yet the court does not want to do
anything about it. Regards Simon Cordell From: Forster, John mailto:
john.forster@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Sent: 20 October 2015 16:03 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: SIMON CORDELL Dear Mr Cordell, Ø Further to your request for a
letter from the court regarding the alleged erroneous entries on the PNC, the
legal adviser has stated that the court cannot supply this information: you
must make your request through the police. Regards, Customer Services Unit (8) Highbury Corner Magistrates
Court 51 Holloway Road LONDON N7 8JA 701, DX: 153700 Highbury 4 Tel: 0207-506 3109 e-mail: gl-hcornermcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Gold fax: 0870 739
5768 I am neither authorised to bind
the Ministry of Justice contractually, nor to make representations or other
statements which may bind the Ministry of Justice in any way via electronic
means. This e-mail (and any
attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you
are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the
sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a
secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by
someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material
in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are
the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and retained by the
Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and
e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure
laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email
was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning
service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes. END |
||||
|
|
|
21/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
28/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/10/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/10/2015 |
|
|
Simulation November 2015
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
November
2015 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
15/11/2015 |
|||
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 613. Jeanette. Reilly
@met.pnn_ (17) / Page Numbers: 2287 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met Police
/ Kingston Crown Court! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
16/11/2015 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 613. Jeanette.
Reilly @met.pnn_ (17) / Page Numbers: 2287, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 16 November 2015 17:36 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Complaint against
police Good afternoon Lorraine, Ø
Just a quick update to let you know that
I have submitted my final report to the Chief Inspector for ratification. Ø
As soon as I receive their decision, Ø
I will update you accordingly. Regards Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation
Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6
1TR Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your
communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are
here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our
environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
|
17/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
22/11/2015 |
|||
|
|
|
23/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
26/11/2015 |
|||
|
|
|
27/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/11/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/11/2015 |
|
|
Simulation December 2015
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
December 2015 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
06/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 614. Jeanette. Reilly @met.pnn_ (18) / Page Numbers: 2299 Professional Standard Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank /
Canopius! |
14/12/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 614. Jeanette. Reilly @met.pnn_ (18) / Page Numbers: 2299, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 14 December 2015 11:13 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: complaint Attachments: 2015 12 14 signed 1sts letter.pdf Good Morning
Lorraine, Ø
Please find attached a letter regarding
the complaint made against police. Ø
As soon as I receive a decision from
Lambeth, I will forward this onto you. Regards Jeanette Jeanette Reilly |
Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) |
Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161
2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress
State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total Policing is
the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch
offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working
with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not
print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to
copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify
the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal
liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email
without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored
to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments
may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to
conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts
no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 615. Jeanette. Reilly @met.pnn_ (19) / Page Numbers: 2300,2301,2302 Professional Standard Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank /
Canopius! |
15/12/2015 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 615. Jeanette. Reilly @met.pnn_ (19) / Page Numbers: 2300,2301,2302, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 15 December 2015 08:32 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: complaint Morning Lorraine, Ø A full report covering all areas of complaint
has been compiled. Ø The Chief Inspector in Lambeth will review the
full report and make a decision on what action or sanction is most
appropriate against the officer. Ø Once his decision has been made, I will notify
you and a further letter will be sent which includes details regarding your
right to appeal should you not agree with the outcome. Ø I appreciate the concerns you have raised but
will now need to wait for the Chief Inspectors final decision before I can
provide you with a full copy of the report that will explain why certain
decisions were reached. Many thanks Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police
Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of
Professional Standards Met Phone 782253 |
Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress
State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 14 December 2015 12:59 To: Reilly Jeanette HQ Directorate of
Professional Standards Subject: RE: complaint Dear Jeanette Ø Thank you for the reply to the complaint. Ø As you have found one of the aspects of the
complaint that PC Geoghegan lied to Simon Insurance is a breach then does
this mean that anything that happened after that fact was unlawful? Ø As this caused a huge impact on Simon life
after that lie happened, he was then arrested due to the lie, had his van
impounded to the lie, and then was found guilty at the lower court and then had
to appeal to prove he was innocent. Ø His insurance company was going to close his
insurance down and we had to prove to them there were no tools in his van and
in fact the police officer had lied. Ø I do not fully understand the one aspect you
have said as that one aspect had a lot to do with what happened after. Ø PC Geoghegan even admits in the crown court
he had not searched the van. Ø Could you please explain to me what this one
aspect means? Regards Lorraine 2301, From:
Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk [Mail To:Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent:
14 December 2015
11:13 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
complaint Good Morning Lorraine, Ø
Please find attached a letter
regarding the complaint made against police. Ø
As soon as I receive a decision
from Lambeth, I will forward this onto you. Regards Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious
Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional
Standards Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor,
Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on
the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and
support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make our capital
safer. Consider our environment - please do not print
this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE
This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright
and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you
must not distribute or copy the information in this email without the
permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the
extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be
read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude
any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no
responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook:
Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter:
@metpolice.uk Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on
the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and
support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make our capital
safer. 2302, information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook:
Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter:
@metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
|
16/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
28/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/12/2015 |
|
|
|
End |
||||
Simulation January 2016
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
January 2016 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
01/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
02/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
03/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
04/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
05/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
06/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
07/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
08/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
09/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
10/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
11/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
12/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
13/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
14/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
15/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
16/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
17/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 617. Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn _ (20) / Page Numbers: 2314 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 618. Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn _ (21) / Page Numbers: 2315,2316 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 619. Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn _ (22) / Page Numbers: 2317,2318,2319,2320 Professional Standard Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
18/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 617. Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn (20) /
Page Numbers: 2314, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 18 January 2016 11:06 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Complaint against Police Good
morning Lorraine, Ø
Just to advise you that Lambeth Borough
are in the process of arranging a date to hold a Misconduct Meeting with the
officer involved in this complaint. Ø
You will be notified of the date of the
meeting in due course by Lambeth and then of the subsequent outcome. Regards Jeanette Jeanette
Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) |
Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find
us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 618. Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn (21) /
Page Numbers: 2315,2316, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 18 January 2016 12:10 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Complaint against Police Dear
Lorraine, Ø
It is my understanding that Simon will be
permitted to attend the meeting, Ø
and this will be explained when Lambeth
inform you of the meeting date. Ø
Hope this helps. Regards Jeanette Jeanette
Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) |
Directorate of Professional Standards Met
Phone 782253 Telephone
020 7161 2253 Fax
020 7161 6798 Email
Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 18 January 2016 11:23 To: Reilly Jeanette HQ Directorate
of Professional Standards Subject: RE: Complaint against Police Dear
Jeanette Ø
Does this mean we can attend the
Misconduct Meeting if we wish to? Ø
And if not do we get a copy of everything
that is said in the meeting? Regards From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk [Mail
To:Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 18 January 2016 11:06 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Complaint against Police Good morning Lorraine, Ø
Just to advise you that Lambeth
Borough are in the process of arranging a date to hold a Misconduct Meeting
with the officer involved in this complaint. Ø
You will be notified of the
date of the meeting in due course by Lambeth and then of the subsequent
outcome. Regards Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable |
Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of 2316, Professional Standards Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd
Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total Policing is the Met's commitment
to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent
crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make
our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email
unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be
confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total Policing is the Met's commitment
to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent
crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make
our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email
unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be
confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 619. Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn (22) /
Page Numbers: 2317,2318,2319,2320, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 18 January 2016 12:33 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Complaint against Police Dear Lorraine, Ø
A full copy of the report will be
disclosed to you once the Misconduct Meeting has been held and any agreed
sanctions imposed on the officer. Ø
Following the Misconduct Meeting I will
be in a position to forward you the full report and a letter outlining your
right to appeal should you disagree with the outcome. Many
thanks Jeanette Jeanette
Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) |
Directorate of Professional Standards Met
Phone 782253 Telephone
020 7161 2253 Fax
020 7161 6798 Email
Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 18 January 2016 12:15 To: Reilly Jeanette HQ Directorate
of Professional Standards Subject: RE: Complaint against Police Dear
Jeanette Ø
Could I therefore ask for a copy of the
report you have made up so I know before we attend what is said in the
report. Ø
I think it is only right I know what has
been said. Ø
As PC G would have been told and it seems
that we are the only one that have not had a copy of the report and the complaint
was put in by my son after all. Regards Lorraine From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk [Mail
To:Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 18 January 2016 12:10 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Complaint
against Police Dear Lorraine, Ø
It is my understanding that
Simon will be permitted to attend the meeting, Ø
and this will be explained when
Lambeth inform you of the meeting date. Ø
Hope this helps. Regards Jeanette 2318, Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable |
Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional
Standards Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd
Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 18 January 2016 11:23 To: Reilly Jeanette HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Subject: RE: Complaint
against Police Dear Jeanette Ø
Does this mean we can attend
the Misconduct Meeting if we wish to? Ø
And if not do we get a copy of
everything that is said in the meeting? Regards From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk [Mail
To:Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 18 January 2016 11:06 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Complaint against Police Good morning Lorraine, Ø
Just to advise you that Lambeth
Borough are in the process of arranging a date to hold a Misconduct Meeting
with the officer involved in this complaint. Ø
You will be notified of the
date of the meeting in due course by Lambeth and then of the subsequent
outcome. Regards Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable |
Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of Professional Standards Met Phone 782253 Telephone 020 7161 2253 Fax 020 7161 6798 Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd
Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total Policing is the Met's commitment to
be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime
and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make our
capital safer. 2319, Consider our environment - please do
not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be
confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during transmission
over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the
Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total Policing is the Met's commitment
to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent
crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make
our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email
unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be
confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in
your communities 2320, Consider our environment - please do
not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be
confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during transmission
over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the
Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
19/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
20/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
21/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
22/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
23/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
24/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
25/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
·
The Asbo
Order got granted in Error with Full Conditions against me and Fraudulently! ·
The Banging
at me got much worse! ·
Debra Came
Back and started again! ·
Stain Came
Back! My Birthday 2 Highbury and Islington allowed A team of Doctors to get access into my home by issuing a warrant to
Monowara Ahmed to cover up the 1st Asbo and what gets allowed to happen to me
illegally, who is an officer of the London Borough of Enfield. -- Asbo! Neighbours! General
Public! Enfield
Council / Neighbourhood Watch Team / Enfield Homes / Met Police / MP’s 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: Data-Protection-Request Enfield Council Housing: Enfield Council Anti-Social Behaviour
Department: / Page Numbers: 2324,2325, “Please supply the information about me I am
entitled to under the Data Protection Act 1998 relating to:” -- Asbo! Neighbours! General
Public! Enfield
Council / Neighbourhood Watch Team / Enfield Homes / Met Police / MP’s 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: Simon Enfield Council Housing: Enfield Council Anti-Social Behaviour
Department: Cordell Authority Letter / Page Numbers: 2326, “To whom it may concern: I am writing this letter
to confirm I do give my mother Miss” -- Asbo! Neighbours! General
Public! Enfield
Council / Neighbourhood Watch Team / Enfield Homes / Met Police / MP’s 5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 621.
x2...Simon_Cordell_authority_Letter_26-01-2016 Enfield Council Housing: Enfield Council Anti-Social Behaviour
Department: / Page Numbers: 2327, -- Asbo! Neighbours! General
Public! Enfield
Council / Neighbourhood Watch Team / Enfield Homes / Met Police / MP’s 6 Data-Protection-Request 582,583 Subject Access Request Info: Sent: 26 January 2016
14:10 From customer services re Simon Cordell From Laura Goodson To: Louise Brown Cc: Jackie Gubby Subject Simon Cordell O2O8 Burncroft Ave [SEC=PROTECT: INVESTIGATION] Hi Louise, Jackie, Mr Cordell called this
afternoon requesting to speak with ourselves in regard to his case against
his neighbour I am sure you know the details, however. -- Asbo! Neighbours! General
Public! Enfield
Council / Neighbourhood Watch Team / Enfield Homes / Met Police / MP’s 7 The Doctor’s Folder / pub Book Issue: 1! Notes From
the: 09/02.2016 Date of
initial referral: 21/01.2016. Date of
assessment: 03/02.2016. Place of
assessment: Patient’s Home London Borough of Enfield Approved Mental Health Professional Assessment
Form. -For use when compulsory powers are being considered Assessing AMHP Sam
Curtis. Hospital Not
applicable Dr Kripalani, Consultant Psychiatrist, Lucas House, 305 - 309
Fore Street, Edmonton, London, N9 OPD Tel 020 8702 3100 GP Nightingale House
Surgery, 1 Nightingale Road, N9 8AJ Tel 020 88059997 /cmhn / Goodie Adama,
Care Coordinator and Community Mental Health Nurse, Lucas House, cmht 305 -
309 Fore Street, Edmonton, London, N9 OPD Tel 020 8702 3100 Page Numbers: 32,33,34,35,36,37 34 On 26/01/2016 Mr Cordell phoned Amal Pomphrey, early
intervention worker. He said that he had been contacted
by a housing officer who had “threatened to get the mental health team out to
see him”. 8 The Doctor’s Folder / pub Book Issue: 5! Stage 5 Folder 5 Originator
Details: 26 Jan 2016 Amal Pomphrey Nursing Page Numbers:81 In addition, Simon said that he would be happy to
meet with me to show me recordings and data. He does not want doctors or the
police visiting. 9 The Doctor’s Folder / pub Book Issue: 5! Stage 5 Folder 5 Originator Details:
26
Jan 2016 Last Amended
by Details: 26 Jan 2016 Amal Pomphrey Nursing Page Numbers:81 Message received to call
Simon. Called Simon on his mobile. Asks after my
welfare. He went on to say that a PC Steve E And Steve from the civic are in collaboration. He has
had a call from Louise Brown (he asked me write down her name) making threats
to get the MH team out to see him. Says his neighbour is victimizing him.
Doesn't want the police or MH team visiting him to say he has anxiety. The
spoke of writing constitutions; he has incriminating evidence. He has things
in black and white that are being used against him. He was pressured, thought
disordered and difficult to follow. He again mentioned HIV but could I not make any sense of what he was
saying as it was rambles. I have spoken with the AMHP office and I understand
a warrant has been granted and a police risk assessment has been forwarded to
the police along with the warrant and a date is now being awaited. I shall email
AMHP office to alert them to my conversation today. -- NHS! Asbo! Neighbours! General Public! Enfield Council / Neighbourhood Watch Team /
Enfield Homes / Met Police / MP’s 10 The Doctor’s Folder / pub Book Issue: 5! Stage 5 Folder 5 Originator
Details: 26 Jan 2016 Last Amended
by Details: 26 Jan 2016 Mr. Anthony Manning Social Worker Page Numbers: 81 telephone contact with housing, the housing
officer are Jackie Gubby And Dawn Allan 02083758131 Dawn will need to know when the assessment is
planned, and they can arrange a lock smith. -- NHS! Asbo! Neighbours! General Public! Enfield Council / Neighbourhood Watch Team /
Enfield Homes / Met Police / MP’s 11 Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI
Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); G.1.1) 18/01/2016: H.1) 18/01/2016: I.1) 18/01/2016: J.1) 26/01/2016: J.1 26/01/2016: from customer services re Simon Cordell From: Laura Goodson Sent: 26 January 2016 14:10 To: Louise Brown • Cc: Jackie Gubby Subject: Simon Cordell 0208 245 7454 109 Burncroft Ave [SEC=PROTECT: INVESTIGATION] Classification: PROTECT – INVESTIGATION Hi Louise, Jackie, Mr Cordell called this afternoon requesting to
speak with yourselves in regard to his case against his neighbour. I am sure you know the details; however, he did
say that his neighbour is making noise when he undresses. He did go on to
mention an incident that resulted in both himself and his neighbour in an
awkward position when he attempted to help her move her bed. Mr Cordell is expecting a call back this
afternoon. Kind Regards Page 14 of 21 “Missing
Page” 12 Stage 4 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 4 22/12/2016 - Please reply to
Geoffrey Mann Geoffrey Mann Neighbourhood
Manager We have checked our records
since 4h August 2015 and found two records of telephone
complaints received from your son. One on 20h August 2015 and
again on 26h January 2016 which related to noise and the
issues he was having with a neighbour. These concerns were dealt with at the
time by relevant officers. Page Number: 27,28,29,30 Asbo! Neighbours! General Public! Enfield Council / Neighbourhood
Watch Team / Enfield Homes / Met Police / MP’s |
26/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 My Birthday 2 Highbury and Islington allowed A team of Doctors to
get access into my home by issuing a warrant to Monowara Ahmed to cover up
the 1st Asbo and what gets allowed to happen to me illegally, who is an
officer of the London Borough of Enfield. 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: Data-Protection-Request / Page Numbers: 2324,2325, Mr Simon Cordell 109 Burncroft Ave
Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ 26/01/2016 Enfield Council Housing: Enfield Council Anti-Social Behaviour
Department: To Whom It May Concern: Subject access request Mr Simon Cordell 109 Burncroft Ave Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ 26/01/2016 Ø Please supply the information about me I am
entitled to under the Data Protection Act 1998 relating to: Ø All information that Enfield Council housing
and Enfield Council Anti-Social Behaviour Department holds about me. Ø This would include all data that has been given to Enfield Council
housing and Enfield Council Anti-Social Behaviour Department by any
government body.
2325,
Ø If this subject access request has been sent
to the wrong department, please can it be sent to the data protection officer
so that my request can be dealt with? Ø I believe there is a cost of £10.00 for the
information due to reading your website. Ø And once all the information has been
gathered, I will be informed of how to pay this. Ø Please email my mother Miss Lorraine Cordell
details of how to pay this cost her email is included above. Ø If you need any more information from me, or
a fee, please let me know as soon as possible. Ø It may be helpful for you to know that a
request for information under the Data Protection Act 1998 should be
responded to within 40 days. Ø If you do not normally deal with these
requests, please pass this letter to your Data Protection Officer. Ø If you need advice on dealing with this
request, the Information Commissioner’s Office can assist you and can be
contacted on 0303 123 1113 or at www.ico.org.uk/ Yours faithfully 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: Simon Cordell Authority Letter / Page Numbers: 2326, Mr Simon Cordell 109 Burncroft Ave
Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ 26/01/2016
To whom it may concern: Ø I am writing this letter to confirm I do give
my mother Miss Lorraine Cordell my authority to speak, write, and email,
Enfield Council this would include any department within Enfield Council on
my behalf. Ø I agree and give authority that my mother
Miss Lorraine Cordell may receive replies to anything that is written from
her email address lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk to Enfield Council on my behalf. And also, that if any letters are
sent to my address, they are also sent to my mother email which is included
above. Regards 5 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 621. x2...Simon_Cordell_authority_Letter_26-01-2016 / Page Numbers: 2327, Mr Simon Cordell 109 Burncroft Ave Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ 26/01/2016 To whom it may concern: Ø I am writing this letter to confirm I do
give my mother Miss Lorraine Cordell my authority to speak, write, and email,
Enfield Council this would include any department within Enfield Council on
my behalf. Ø I agree and give authority that my mother
Miss Lorraine Cordell may receive replies to anything that is written from
her email address lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk to Enfield Council on my behalf. Ø And also, that if any letters are sent to my
address, they are also sent to my mother email which is included above. Regards Simon Cordell 6 Data-Protection-Request Sent: 26 January 2016 14:10 From customer services re Simon Cordell From: Laura Goodson To: Louise Brown Cc: Jackie Gubby Subject: Simon Cordell O2O8 Burncroft Ave [SEC=PROTECT: INVESTIGATION] Classification: PROTECT – INVESTIGATION. Hi Louise, Jackie, Ø Mr Cordell called this afternoon requesting
to speak with ourselves in regard to his case against his neighbour I am sure
you know the details; however, he did say that his neighbour is making noise
when he undresses. He did go on to mention an incident that resulted in both
himself and his neighbour in an awkward position when he attempted to help
her move her bed. Ø Mr Cordell is expecting a call
back this afternoon. Kind Regards 26/01/2016 Mr Simon Cordell Burncroft Ave Enfield Middlesex EN3 7JQ Enfield Council Housing: Enfield Council: -- Anti-Social Behaviour Department: -- ·
To
Whom It May Concern: Subject access request, please supply the information
about me, I am entitled to under the Data Protection Act 1998 relating to all
information that Enfield Council’s, housing department and Enfield Council
Anti-Social Behaviour Department holds about me. Ø This would include all data that has been
given to the Enfield Council housing and Enfield Council Anti-Social
Behaviour Department by any government body. Ø If any data Enfield Council housing and
Enfield Council Anti-Social Behaviour Department done via telephone calls
please supply copies of recorded information and all telephone calls that I
have had with any member of Enfield Council housing and Enfield Council
Anti-Social Behaviour Department, please supply copies of recorded
information any information and data that Enfield Council housing and Enfield
Council Anti-Social Behaviour Department hold about me, this would include
data you have been given from any other persons or establishment. Ø Any Information that Enfield Council housing
and Enfield Council Anti-Social Behaviour Department has gathered about me. Ø Any data that have been made up from data you
have been given and any data you have on this file would include letters,
emails reports sent and received about me, this would also include any data
that the police have given Enfield Council housing and Enfield Council
Anti-Social Behaviour Department and any reports sent to the police from
Enfield Council housing and Enfield Council Anti-Social Behaviour Department.
Ø If you are withholding any information, I
have asked to please make me aware of this and the reason as to why the data
is being denied. Ø I have included with this request an
Authority Letter so that you may send the information to my mother, Miss
Mother email address and speak to her on my behalf about any information, her
email, address is: Xxxx Ø If this subject access request has been sent
to the wrong department please can it be sent to the data protection officer
so that my request can be dealt with? Ø I believe there is a cost of £10.00 for the
information due to reading your website and once all the information has been
gathered, I will be informed of how to pay this. Ø Please email my mother, Miss Mother details
of how to pay this cost her email is included above. Ø If you need any more information from me, or
a fee, please let me know as soon as possible. Ø It may be helpful for you to know that a
request for information under the Data Protection Act 1998 should be
responded to within 40 days. Ø If you do not normally deal with these
requests, please pass this letter to your Data Protection Officer, if you
need advice on dealing with this request, the Information Commissioner’s
Office can assist you and can be contacted on 0303 123 1113 or at www.ico.org.uk Yours faithfully 7 The Doctor’s
Folder / pub Book Issue: 1! Notes From the: 09/02.2016 Date of initial referral: 21/01.2016. Date of assessment: 03/02.2016. Place of assessment: Patient’s Home London Borough of Enfield Approved Mental Health Professional Assessment Form. -For use when
compulsory powers are being considered Assessing AMHP Sam Curtis. Hospital Not applicable Dr Kripalani, Consultant
Psychiatrist, Lucas House, 305 - 309 Fore Street, Edmonton, London, N9 OPD
Tel 020 8702 3100 GP Nightingale House Surgery, 1 Nightingale Road, N9 8AJ
Tel 020 88059997 /cmhn / Goodie Adama, Care Coordinator and Community Mental
Health Nurse, Lucas House, cmht 305 - 309 Fore Street, Edmonton, London, N9
OPD Tel 020 8702 3100 Page Numbers: 32,33,34,35,36,37 “Not Relevant to Day!” 33, “Not Relevant to Day!” 34, Ø On 26.01.16 Mr Cordell phoned Amal Pomphrey, early
intervention worker. Ø He said that he had been contacted by a
housing officer who had “threatened to get the mental health team out to see
him”. 35, “Not Relevant to Day!” 36, “Not Relevant to Day!” 37 “Not Relevant to Day!” 8 The Doctor’s
Folder / pub Book Issue: 5! Stage 5 Folder 5 Originator Details: 26
Jan 2016 Amal Pomphrey Nursing Page Numbers: 81 Originator Details: 26 Jan 2016 16:26 Amal Pomphrey Nursing Originally Entered by Details: 26 Jan 2016 16:27 Amal Pomphrey Last Amended by Details: 26 Jan 2016 16:27 Amal Pomphrey Validated by Details: 26 Jan 2016 16:27 Amal Pomphrey Significant: No Added to Risk History: No Contains Third Party Info: No Conceal From Client: Not Concealed Ø In addition, Simon said that he would be
happy to meet with me to show me recordings and data. Ø He does not want doctors or the police
visiting. 9 The Doctor’s
Folder / pub Book Issue: 5! Stage 5 Folder 5 Originator Details: 26
Jan 2016 Last Amended by
Details: 26 Jan 2016 Amal Pomphrey Nursing Page Numbers: 81 Originator Details: 26 Jan 2016 16:09 Amal Pomphrey Nursing Originally Entered by Details: 26 Jan 2016 16:13 Amal Pomphrey Last Amended by Details: 26 Jan 2016 16:23 Amal Pomphrey Validated by Details: 26 Jan 2016 16:23 Amal Pomphrey Significant: No Added to Risk History: No Contains Third Party Info: No Conceal From Client: Not Concealed Message received to
call Simon. Ø Called Simon on his mobile. Ø Asks after my welfare. Ø He went on to say that a PC Steve E and
Steve from the civic are in collaboration. Ø He has had a call from Louise Brown (he
asked me write down her name) making threats to get the MH team out to see
him. Ø Says his neighbour is victimizing him. Ø Doesn't want the police or MH team visiting
him to say he has anxiety. Ø The spoke of writing constitutions; he has
incriminating evidence. Ø He has things in black and white that are
being used against him. Ø He was pressured, thought disordered and
difficult to follow. Ø He again mentioned HIV but could I not make
any sense of what he was saying as it was rambles. Ø I have spoken with the AMHP office and I
understand a warrant has been granted and a police risk assessment has been
forwarded to the police along with the warrant and a date is now being
awaited. Ø I shall email AMHP office to alert them to
my conversation today. 10 The Doctor’s
Folder / pub Book Issue: 5! Stage 5 Folder 5 Originator Details: 26
Jan 2016 Last Amended by
Details: 26 Jan 2016 Mr. Anthony Manning
Social Worker Page Numbers: 81 Originator Details: 26 Jan 2016
14:36 Mr Anthony Manning Social Worker - Social Worker Originally Entered by Details: 26 Jan 2016 14:38 Mr Anthony Manning Last Amended by Details: 26 Jan 2016 14:38 Mr Anthony Manning Validated by Details: 26 Jan 2016 14:38 Mr Anthony Manning Significant: No Added to Risk History: No Contains Third Party Info: No Conceal Ø From
Client: Not Concealed Ø telephone contact with housing, Ø the housing officer are Jackie Gubby and
Dawn Allan 02083758131. Ø Dawn will need to know when the assessment
is planned, and they can arrange a lock smith Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); = A) 24/01/2017 Page 1 of 21 01 24/01/2017
02 Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); B) 24/01/2017 C) 23/09/2015 + Date reported: /09/2015. D) 23/09/2015 Page 2 of 21
03 Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); E) 24/01/2017 F) 23/09/2015 Page 3 of 21
04 Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); G) 23/09/2015 H) 23/09/2015 I) 23/09/2015 Page 4 of 21
05 Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); J) 24/01/2017 K) 18/09/2015 L) 23/09/2015 M) 23/09/2015 Page 5 of 21
06 Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); N) 24/01/2017 O) 23/09/2015 P) 23/09/2015 Q) 23/09/2015 R) 23/09/2015 S) 23/09/2015 T) 24/09/2015 U) 28/09/2015 V) 24/09/2015 W) 24/09/2015 Page 6 of 21
07 Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); X) 24/01/2017 Y) 01/03/2012 Z) 02/03/2014 A.1) 00/11/2014 B.1) 01/10/2015 C.1) 01/10/2015 Page 7 of 21
08 24/01/2017
09 24/01/2017
10 24/01/2017
11 Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); D.1) 23/09/2015 Missing true date due to page missing Page 11 of 21
12 Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); D.1) 24/01/2017 E.1) 13/10/2015 Page 12 of 21
13 Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); F.1) 24/01/2017 G.1) 18/01/2016 15/01/2016 Page 13 of 21
14 Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); G.1.1) 18/01/2016 H.1) 18/01/2016 I.1) 18/01/2016 J.1) 26/01/2016 Page 14 of 21
15 24/01/2017
16 Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); K.1) 24/01/2017 L.1) 27/01/2016 Page 16 of 21
17 Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); M.1) 24/01/2017 N.1) 27/01/2016 Page 17 of 21
18 Stage 5 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 5 Deborah Andrews / Enfield Council Case History Page Number: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, DATE(S); O.1) 24/01/2017 P.1) 01/02/2016 Page 18 of 21
19 24/01/2017
20 24/01/2017
21 24/01/2017
12 Stage 4 The Enfield Councils History FOI Indexed Stage 4 Please reply to: Geoffrey Mann Geoffrey Mann Neighbourhood Manager Page Number: 27,28,29,30, 22/12/2016 27, 22nd December 2016 24th November 2016 24th November 2016 5th December 2016 8th December 2016 4th August 2015 18th November 2016 25th November 2016 29th November 2016
28, 4h August 2015 20h August 2015 26h January 2016 4th August 2015 4th October 2016 14th August 2016
29, 29th November 2016 21 November 2016 November 2016
30, 3rd January 2017
The banging Started! Debbie Andrews (responsible) Stain Curtis (responsible) Mathiyalagan (Responsible) Time: All-Day and All-Night
whenever they knew that I was indoors! I got wrongly, accused of the Asbo allegations and treated
unfairly by my neighbours and The Local Council and housing teams! The Enfield Council and the Enfield Homes employees aloud the
occupiers of 117 and 113 and 111 Continued to victimizing me by Waking me up in the morning banging above my head then Jumping up and
down on the floor above where ever they can tell that I am present below all
day long while slamming the water taps on and of shaking all the water pipes
in the building! While victimizing me with intent of utilizing the same reiterated
items of the building fixtures to have tortures effects on me within my
rented habitation is inequitable living circumstances! Disrepair! I signed an agreement to upkeep my conditions in my tenancy agreement
and I do so but the Enfield Council do not keep to their side of the
agreement in regards to fixing the heating sound proofing and damp issues I
face every day at my losses in life! Time Spent Building. In the background of everything going I continued working on creating
a new and up to date Event Incident Control Centre plan and I continued to
Study and finish at the Time Start: 07:00Am and Time End: 03:30 Pm! My mother also continues to work on building my company website for me
with others at the Time Start: 09:00 and Time End: 14:00! Working at Home doing Court Case Defense Work! I spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building
my defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time
Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
27/01/2016 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
27/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
28/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
29/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
30/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
31/01/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Simulation February 2016
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
February 2016 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
27/02/2016 |
|||
|
|
|
27/02/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2016 |
|
|
Simulation March 2016
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
March 2016 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 627. Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn_ (6) / Page
Numbers: 2380,2381 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met Police
/ Kingston Crown Court! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 628. Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn_ (1) / Page
Numbers: 2382,2383,2384 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met Police
/ Kingston Crown Court! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
11/03/2016 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 627. Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn_ (6) / Page
Numbers: 2380,2381, From: Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk on
behalf of LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 11 March 2016 08:55 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: ***Your Complaint PC /
6804 / 13*** Attachments: SMIU report.pdf; Invite
letter to complainant 10 03 16 _2_.pdf Good Morning Ø Please see attached letter of
invitation to attend a meeting in relation to your complaint. Ø Can you please let us know as
soon as possible if you will be attending thank you? Ø Please also see attached report
as promised? Regards Katie Lambeth
Professional Standards Unit Civil
Actions, Complaints and Praise PC Katie Heath 301LX Professional
Standards Unit, 3rd Floor, Brixton
Police Station, 367 Brixton Road, London, SW9 7DD Restricted
Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your
communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are
here for London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our
environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments
may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are
intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received
this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the
information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find
us at: 2381, Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 628. Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn_ (1) /
Page Numbers: 2382,2383,2384, From: Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk on behalf of LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 11 March 2016 14:08 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: ***Your Complaint PC /
6804 / 13*** Good
Afternoon Lorraine & Simon That
is absolutely fine. Ø Take your time to absorb the
information that I have sent you and let me know after the weekend if you
wish. Ø I can then save and send your
response to the officer chairing the meeting on 06/04/16. Ø Thank you letting us know Kind
Regards Katie Lambeth
Professional Standards Unit Civil Actions, Complaints and Praise PC Katie Heath 301LX Professional
Standards Unit, 3rd Floor, Brixton
Police Station, 367 Brixton Road, London, SW9 7DD Restricted From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 11 March 2016 13:39 To: LX Mailbox Professional Standards
Unit Subject: RE: ***Your Complaint PC/ 6804 /
13*** Dear
Katie Ø Thank you for the reply email and
the report. Ø I now understand the Misconduct
Meeting will be held on Wednesday 6th April at 2pm and that we can attend
this meeting if we wish to. Ø When speaking to chief Inspector
Tony Hirst on a phone call the other day, he did also say we could write a
letter in that the person who will be chairing the Misconduct Meeting could
read if we did not wish to attend the meeting, if we wished to take up this
option and write a letter could this be emailed over to you so it could be
added to the file to be read by the person who will be chairing the meeting? Ø My son at this time is reading
the report that you kindly sent over in your email today. Ø But until he has read this I
cannot say if he will wish to attend the meeting or write a Letter yet. Ø Upon reading the report myself
there is many things I am unhappy with. Ø But it is not down to me to agree
with the report or disagree with it that would be down to my son Simon
Cordell 2383, Ø But if you could let me know if
he chooses to write a letter and not attend the Misconduct Meeting should it
be sent to this email. Ø If not, could we have an email
address of where it should be sent to be linked in with the files for the
meeting. Regards Lorraine
Cordell Simon
Cordell From: Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk] On Behalf Of LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 11 March 2016 08:55 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: ***Your Complaint PC / 6804 / 13*** Good Morning Ø Please see attached letter
of invitation to attend a meeting in relation to your complaint. Ø Can you please let us
know as soon as possible if you will be attending thank you? Ø Please also see
attached report as promised? Regards Katie Lambeth Professional Standards Unit
Civil Actions, Complaints and Praise PC Katie
Heath 301LX Professional Standards Unit, 3rd Floor,
Brixton Police Station, 367 Brixton Road, London, SW9 7DD Restricted Total Policing is the Met's commitment
to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent
crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make
our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email
unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments
may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are
intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received
this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you 2384, systems are monitored to the extent
permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by
monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any
binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total Policing is the Met's commitment
to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent
crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make
our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do
not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be
confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
12/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 629. Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn_ (2) / Page Numbers: 2385,2386,2387,2388,2389 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met Police
/ Kingston Crown Court! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
16/03/2016 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 629. Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn_ (2) /
Page Numbers: 2385,2386,2387,2388,2389, From: Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk on behalf of LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 16 March 2016 07:03 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: ***Your Complaint PC /
6804 / 13*** Good
Morning Lorraine & Simon Ø Thank you for getting back to me.
Ø I will pass whatever documentation
that Simon produces to Inspector Cochlin for his use Ø Once the meeting has taken place
and a decision on the outcome made this will be passed back to Jeanette
Reilly at DPS and she will notify you of the outcome. Ø Please don't hesitate to contact
me should you have any other concerns or questions Kind
Regards Katie Lambeth
Professional Standards Unit Civil
Actions, Complaints and Praise PC Katie Heath 301LX Professional
Standards Unit, 3rd Floor, Brixton
Police Station, 367 Brixton Road, London, SW9 7DD Restricted From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 15 March 2016 17:50 To: LX Mailbox Professional Standards
Unit Subject: RE: ***Your Complaint PC/ 6804 /
13*** Dear
Katie My
Son has chosen to do a letter, but it will take some days to go over all the
points so hopefully I will have the letter sent over to you early next week. Regards Lorraine
Cordell Simon
Cordell From: Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk] On Behalf Of LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 11 March 2016 14:08 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: ***Your
Complaint PC/ 6804 / 13*** 2386, Good Afternoon Lorraine & Simon Ø Take your time to
absorb the information that I have sent you and let me know after the weekend
if you wish. Ø I can then save and
send your response to the officer chairing the meeting on 06/04/16. Ø Thank you letting us
know Kind Regards Katie Lambeth Professional Standards Unit Civil Actions, Complaints and Praise PC Katie
Heath 301LX Professional Standards Unit, 3rd Floor, Brixton Police Station, 367 Brixton
Road, London, SW9 7DD Restricted From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 11 March 2016 13:39 To: LX Mailbox Professional Standards Unit Subject: RE: ***Your
Complaint PC / 6804 / 13*** Dear Katie Ø Thank you for the reply
email and the report. Ø I now understand the
Misconduct Meeting will be held on Wednesday 6th April at 2pm and that
we can attend this meeting if we wish to. Ø When speaking to chief
Inspector Tony Hirst on a phone call the other day, he did also say we could
write a letter in that the person who will be chairing the Misconduct Meeting
could read if we did not wish to attend the meeting, if we wished to take up
this option and write a letter could this be emailed over to you so it could
be added to the file to be read by the person who will be chairing the
meeting? Ø My son at this time is
reading the report that you kindly sent over in your email today. Ø But until he has read
this I cannot say if he will wish to attend the meeting or write a Letter
yet. Ø Upon reading the report
myself there is many things I am unhappy with. Ø But it is not down to
me to agree with the report or disagree with it that would be down to my son
Simon Cordell Ø But if you could let me
know if he chooses to write a letter and not attend the Misconduct Meeting
should it be sent to this email. Ø If not, could we have
an email address of where it should be sent to be linked in with the files
for the meeting. 2387,2388,2389, |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
17/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 630. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._
Enfield Council Subject Access Request Simon Cordell / Page
Numbers: 2390,2391,2392,2393 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC Brixton Case / Met Police
/ Kingston Crown Court! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
18/03/2016 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 630. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._
Enfield Council Subject Access Request Simon Cordell /
Page Numbers: 2390,2391,2392,2393, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 18 March 2016 21:08 To: 'HHASC FOI Mailbox';
'Nicholas Foster' Subject: FW: Enfield Council Subject
Access Request Simon Cordell Dear
Nicholas Foster, Ø I sent in the subject access request on Wed 27/01/2016 18:20
you have 40 days to supply the information which ended on the 07/3/2016 but
I am still waiting I have had replies from yourself saying the data is being
gathered. Ø But we are now 12 days over the time, would it please be possible to
get an update as to when I will be given the information. Regards Lorraine
Cordell Simon
Cordell From: Nicholas Foster [mailto:
Nicholas.Foster@Enfield.gov.uk] Sent: 09 March 2016 19:29 To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Feedback Council Housing Subject: RE: Enfield Council Subject
Access Request Simon Cordell Dear
Mr and Mrs Cordell Ø The matter is being dealt with. Ø I am copying officers who will let you know when you can collect the
records and make arrangements for payment and ID verification. Regards Complaints
and Access to Information Manager Gateway Services Finance, Resources and
Customer Services 0208
379 6498 Enfield
Council Silver
Street Enfield EN1
3XY Enfield
Council is committed to serving the whole Borough fairly, delivering
excellent services and building strong communities. From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 09 March 2016 15:55 To: HHASC FOI Mailbox;
Nicholas Foster Subject: FW: Enfield Council Subject
Access Request Simon Cordell Dear
Nicholas Foster Ø I was wondering if there was any update to the request that was put
in. Regards Simon
Cordell Lorraine
Cordell 2391,2392,2393, |
||||
|
|
|
19/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
27/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/03/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/03/2016 |
|
|
Simulation April
2016 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
April 2016 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
01/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
02/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
03/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
·
Disrepair! ·
The Asbo
Order got granted in Error with Full Conditions against me and Fraudulently! ·
The Banging
at me Continued! ·
Debra Moved
for Ever! 1 ·
ASBO mentioning took place, and the judge asked for a
schedule to get made by the prosecution; 04/04/2016 -- Asbo! 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 634. Alexander.Marshall@met.pnn / Page
Numbers: 2406,2407,2408,2409,2410,2411,2412 -- Professional Standard
Office – IPCC! Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 635. Alexander.Marshall@met.pnn_ (1) / Page
Numbers: 2413,2414,2415,2416,2417,2418,2419,2420 -- Professional Standard
Office – IPCC! Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
04/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 ASBO
mentioning Took place, and the judge
asked for a schedule to get made by the prosecution; 04/04/2016.
2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 634. Alexander.Marshall@met.pnn /
Page Numbers: 2406,2407,2408,2409,2410,2411,2412, From: Alexander.Marshall@met.pnn.police.uk on behalf of LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 04 April 2016 11:19 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: ***Your Complaint PC/ 6804 /
13*** Lorraine, Ø Thank you for your
email. Ø It could be due to the content of
the letter and certain words which cause emails to be blocked on our system. Ø I have a couple of options for
you 1. Hand
delivers a copy to Brixton Police
Station if convenient. 2. Scan the letter and save as a pdf (as
opposed to saving document as a pdf) 3. this will then ensure the document is
saved as an image and will ignore any language/words which could be blocked
out by our automated system Kind
regards Alex
Marshall Alex
Marshall Police
Sergeant 80 LX | Lambeth Borough | Professional
Standards & Senior Leadership Team Support Telephone
020 8649 2101 Met
Phone 732101 Email
alexander.marshall@met.police.uk Address
Brixton Police Station, Brixton Road, London, SW9 7DD From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 04 April 2016 11:02 To: LX Mailbox Professional Standards
Unit; Heath Katie J LX Subject: RE: ***Your Complaint PC/ 6804 /
13*** Dear
Katie Ø I have been trying to send the
letter over to you since the 01/04/2016
Ø and I am getting emails back that
the email has been blocked. Ø The emails are coming from JBHmailmarshal@met.police.uk Ø And mailmarshal@met.police.uk Ø I am not sure if it is due to the
attached letter, I am putting in the email. Ø Is there an email address I can
send an email with an attachment? Ø or will I need to just copy the
letter into the email. Ø I have tried word format and also
PDF format in the emails. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 04 April 2016 10:44 To: 'Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: FW: ***Your Complaint PC/ 6804 /
13*** 2407, Dear
Katie Ø I sent the attached file and on the 01/04/2016 and only got an email today saying it did not send. Ø Please see attached would like to be put forward for the Misconduct
Meeting on Wednesday 6th April at 2pm for Inspector Cochlin to read. Ø I am forwarding it to this email
also can you let me know if you get the email please. Regards Lorraine
Cordell Simon
Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 04 April 2016 10:42 To: 'LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: ***Your Complaint PC/ 6804 /
13*** Dear
Katie Ø I sent the attached file and on
the 01/04/2016 and only got an email today saying it did not send. Ø Please see attached would like to
be put forward for the Misconduct Meeting on Wednesday 6th April at 2pm for
Inspector Cochlin to read. Regards Lorraine
Cordell Simon
Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 01 April 2016 12:51 To: 'LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: ***Your Complaint PC/ 6804 /
13*** Dear
Katie Ø Please see attached the letter we would like to be put forward for
the Misconduct Meeting on Wednesday 6th April at 2pm for Inspector Cochlin to
read. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk] On Behalf Of LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 16 March 2016 07:03 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: ***Your
Complaint PC/ 6804 / 13*** Good Morning Lorraine & Simon Ø Thank you for getting
back to me. Ø I will pass whatever
documentation that Simon produces to Inspector Cochlin for his use Ø Once the meeting has
taken place and a decision on the outcome made this will be passed back to
Jeanette Reilly at DPS and she will notify you of the outcome. Ø Please don't hesitate
to contact me should you have any other concerns or questions 2408,2409,2410,2411,2412, 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 635. Alexander.Marshall@met.pnn_ (1) /
Page Numbers: 2413,2414,2415,2416,2417,2418,2419,2420, From: Alexander.Marshall@met.pnn.police.uk on behalf of LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 04 April 2016 12:29 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: ***Your Complaint PC/ 6804 /
13*** Lorraine, Ø Thanks for your email, Ø I can confirm your letter has
been fully received. Kind
regards Alex Alex
Marshall Police
Sergeant 80 LX | Lambeth Borough | Professional Standards & Senior
Leadership Team Support Telephone
020 8649 2101 Met
Phone 732101 Email
alexander.marshall@met.police.uk Address Brixton Police
Station, Brixton Road, London, SW9 7DD From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 04 April 2016 11:44 To: LX Mailbox Professional Standards Unit; Marshall Alex H LX Subject: RE: ***Your
Complaint PC/ 6804 / 13*** Dear Alexander Ø Thank you for the
advice I have scanned in the letter and then put to PDF. Ø I am going to try and
resend it now. Ø Please see attached would
like to be put forward for the Misconduct Meeting on Wednesday 6th April at
2pm for Inspector Cochlin to read. Ø Can you confirm you get
it please? Regards Lorraine Cordell Simon Cordell From: Alexander.Marshall@met.pnn police.uk [mailto: Alexander.Marshall@met.pnn. police.uk] On Behalf Of LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 04 April 2016 11:19 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: ***Your
Complaint PC/ 6804 / 13*** Lorraine, Ø Thank you for your
email. Ø It could be due to the
content of the letter and certain words which cause emails to be blocked on
our system. 2414,2415,2416,2417,2418,2419,2420, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 636. Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn_ (3) / Page Numbers:
2421,2422,2423,2424,2425,2426,2427 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC! Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 637. Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn_ (4) / Page
Numbers: 2428,2429,2430,2431,2432,2433, 2434,2435,2436,2437 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC! Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
05/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 636. Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn_ (3) /
Page Numbers: 2421,2422,2423,2424,2425,2426,2427, From: Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk on behalf of LX
Mailbox. ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 05 April 2016 07:03 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: LX Mailbox. ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: ***Your Complaint PC /
6804 / 13*** Good
Morning Lorraine Ø Apologies for the inconvenience. Ø Sometimes our Web Marshall picks
up on swear words within a document or any other inappropriate language. Ø If you have tried PDF and that
didn't work the only other thing, Ø I can suggest is printing off the
document and scanning it, then email it this seems to work when I have
suffered the same issue. Ø If you have access to a Fax
machine you could try that our number is 0208 649 2125 Kind
Regards Katie Lambeth
Professional Standards Unit Civil Actions, Complaints and Praise PC Katie Heath 301LX Professional
Standards Unit, 3rd Floor, Brixton
Police Station, 367 Brixton Road, London, SW9 7DD Restricted From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 04 April 2016 11:02 To: LX Mailbox Professional Standards Unit; Heath Katie J LX Subject: RE: ***Your
Complaint PC / 6804 / 13*** Dear Katie Ø I have been trying to
send the letter over to you since the 01/04/2016 and I am getting emails back that the email has been
blocked. Ø The emails are coming
from JBHmailmarshal@met.police.uk Ø And mailmarshal@met.police.uk Ø I am not sure if it is
due to the attached letter, Ø I am putting in the
email. Ø Is there an email
address I can send an email with an attachment? Ø or will I need to just
copy the letter into the email. Ø I have tried word
format and also PDF format in the emails. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 04 April 2016 10:44 To: 'Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: FW: ***Your Complaint PC/ 6804 /
13*** 2422,2423,2424,2425,2426,2427, 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 637. Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn_ (4) /
Page Numbers: 2428,2429,2430,2431,2432, 2433,2434,2435,2436,2437, From: Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk on behalf of LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 05 April 2016 07:48 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: ***Your Complaint PC /
6804 / 13*** Attachments: Update letter to complainant
05 04 16.pdf Good
Morning Ø Please see attached update Kind
Regards Katie Lambeth
Professional Standards Unit Civil Actions, Complaints and Praise PC Katie Heath 301LX Professional
Standards Unit, 3rd Floor, Brixton Police Station, 367 Brixton Road, London,
SW9 7DD Restricted From: Lorraine Cord ell
[mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 04 April 2016 18:59 To: LX Mailbox Professional Standards
Unit Subject: RE: ***Your Complaint PC/ 6804 /
13*** Dear
Alex Ø Thank you for letting me know Kind
Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Alexander.Marshall@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Alexander.Marshall@met.pnn.police.uk On Behalf Of LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 04 April 2016 12:29 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: ***Your
Complaint PC/ 6804 / 13*** Lorraine, Ø Thanks for your email, Ø I can confirm your
letter has been fully received. Kind regards 2429,2430,2431,2432,2433,2434,2435,2436,2437, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
06/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
07/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
08/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
09/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
10/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
11/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
12/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
13/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
14/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
15/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
16/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
17/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
18/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
19/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
20/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
21/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
22/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
23/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
24/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
25/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
26/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
27/04/2016 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 638. Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn_ (5) / Page
Numbers: 2438,2439,2440,2441,2442,2443, 2444,2445,2446,2447,2448 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC! Brixton Case / Met
Police! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
28/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 638. Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn_ (5) /
Page Numbers: 2438,2439,2440,2441,2442,2443, 2444,2445,2446,2447,2448, From: Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk on behalf of LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 28 April 2016 07:27 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Cc: neil.cochlin@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: ***Your Complaint PC/ 6804 /
13*** Good
Morning Ø The meeting took place as planned
and we are in the process of writing the final report / outcome. Ø You will certainly be notified of
this and receive a copy of the report once it is done Ø If you have any other queries
please do not hesitate to ask Kind
Regards Katie From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 27 April 2016 18:47 To: LX Mailbox ‐
Professional Standards Unit <LX Mailbox‐. ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Heath Katie J ‐ LX
<Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: ***Your Complaint ‐ PC
/ 6804 / 13*** Dear
Katie Ø Would it please be possible to
send out the outcome of the Misconduct Meeting on the 26/04/2016 via
this email? Ø if possible so we know what has
happened please? Regards Simon
Cordell Lorraine
Cordell From: Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Katie.J.Heath@met.pnn.police.uk] On Behalf Of LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 05 April 2016 07:48 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: ***Your Complaint PC/ 6804 / 13*** Good Morning Ø Please see attached
update Kind Regards Katie Lambeth Professional Standards Unit Civil Actions, Complaints and Praise PC Katie Heath
301LX 2439, Professional Standards Unit, 3rd Floor, Brixton Police Station, 367 Brixton
Road, London, SW9 7DD Restricted From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 04 April 2016 18:59 To: LX Mailbox Professional Standards Unit Subject: RE: ***Your
Complaint PC/ 6804 / 13*** Dear Alex Ø Thank you for letting
me know Kind Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Alexander.Marshall@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Alexander.Marshall@met.pnn.police.uk On Behalf Of LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 04 April 2016 12:29 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Cc: LXMailbox.ProfessionalStandardsUnit@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: ***Your
Complaint PC/ 6804 / 13*** Lorraine, Ø Thanks for your email, Ø I can confirm your
letter has been fully received. Kind regards Alex Alex Marshall Police Sergeant 80 LX | Lambeth Borough
| Professional Standards & Senior
Leadership Team Support Telephone 020 8649 2101 | Met Phone
732101 | Email alexander.marshall@met.police.uk Address Brixton Police Station, Brixton
Road, London, SW9 7DD From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 04 April 2016 11:44 To: LX Mailbox Professional Standards Unit; Marshall Alex H LX Subject: RE: ***Your
Complaint PC/ 6804 / 13*** Dear Alexander Ø Thank you for the
advice I have scanned in the letter and then put to PDF. Ø I am going to try and
resend it now. Ø Please see attached
would like to be put forward for the Misconduct Meeting on Wednesday 6th
April at 2pm for Inspector Cochlin to read. Ø Can you confirm you get
it please? 2440,2441,2442,2443,2444,2445,2446,2447,2448, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
29/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
30/04/2016 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Simulation May
2016 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
May 2016 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
·
Disrepair! ·
The Asbo
Order got granted in Error with Full Conditions against me and Fraudulently! ·
The banging
at me Slowed Down! 1 ·
George Quinton Moved into 113 Burncroft Avenue / 1 x new Tenant moved
into 113 Burncroft Avenue / dated 02/05/2016! 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 639. _ (23) / Page
Numbers: 2449 Professional Standard
Office – IPCC! Brixton Case / Met Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnnPolice! Broadsure Insurance / KGM
Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
04/05/2016 |
|
|
|
1 George
Quinton Moved into 113 Burncroft Avenue / 1 x new Tenant moved into
113 Burncroft Avenue / dated 02/05/2016! 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 639. Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn _ (23) / Page
Numbers: 2449, From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 04 May 2016 10:15 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: complaint outcome Attachments: 2015 12 14 Final Outcome Report.doc;
Outcome
finding misconduct letter 2nd to C with appeal Mr Cordell.doc Good
morning Lorraine, Ø Please find attached a copy of
the outcome report and a letter explaining the decision and action taken
against PC Geoghegan. Ø Thank you for your continued
patience and assistance throughout the investigation. Regards Jeanette Jeanette
Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) |
Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 Telephone
020 7161 2253 Fax
020 7161 6798 Email
Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and
are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find
us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk The banging Started! Flat – 113 George Quinton
Moved in! Stain Curtis (responsible) Mathiyalagan (Responsible) All Morning: -- Mid-Day: -- In the Evening and of the
Night! The Enfield Council and the
Enfield Homes employees aloud the occupiers of 117 and 111 Perpetuated to
victimizing me by: -- 117 waking me up straight
after I feel to sleep by attacking me on purpose by stamping and dropping
articles above my head and follow me to the toilet when I am being sick and
start banging above my head The occupiers of 117 the
Mathiyalagan family and also Stain Curtis off 111 Burncroft Avenue continue
to Slamming the water tap on and off, causing damage to my health and the
buildings fixtures at an unacceptable rate! Stain playing with pots or
pans on his kitchen wall like the devil that has surmounted his sole I cannot
believe that I had so much love for him and reverence and he treats me this
way in my life and my dotted ones! The occupiers of 117 keep on
assailing me and then Slamming their own living room, door closed
repentantly! Summary! My Heart has genuinely commenced
to hurt me every day, I am having an early aged mild heart attacks because of
what the Mathiyalagan family stain and Debra with the police and local
council members are getting away with each day holding me hostage with no
first hand witness and the estate members flushing the toilet assailing me
when I am in the bathtub and getting divested all so playing with the
dihydrogen monoxide taps and banging above my head damaging my work studies
and private family life and making me a Vulnerably susceptible person! The Mathiyalagan 117 family
keep slamming the dihydrogen monoxide tap on and off at an unacceptable rate,
while stain 111 factitiously joins in from his flats kitchen dihydrogen
monoxide supply to daunt me into moving home and this is causing earnest
damage to my health and salubrity while everyone else on the estate can
auricularly discern and does nothing to forfend me from them! I have withal had a plethora
of quandaries with victualing because of what they keep all doing to me! My canine has victualing its
paws because of what 113 – 117 and 111 are getting away with I have taken
pictures of the damage this is doing to us in this flat! Disrepair! I have no other option other than
to suffer because of the Enfield Councils and the Enfield Homes teams staff
neglect towards my life for their apathy about my well –being because of the
damp and heating! Time Spent Building. In the background of
everything going I continued working on Creating a new and up to date Event
Public awareness information for Too Smooth Entertainments mini fest! and I
continued to Study and finish at the Time Start: 07:00Am and Time End: 03:30
Pm! My mother also continues to
work on building my company website for me with others at the Time Start:
09:00 and Time End: 14:00! Working at Home doing Court Case Defense Work! I
spent time and resources costing expenditure with my mother also building my
defence case, against the allegations getting put against me at the Time
Start: 12:00 Am and Time End: 06:00 Am! |
||||
|
|
|
05/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
06/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
27/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/05/2016 |
|
|
|
|
||||
Simulation June 2016
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
June 2016 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
06/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
27/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/06/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/06/2016 |
|
|
Simulation July
2016 (Click here to go back to the Index)
|
July 2016 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
06/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/07/2016 |
|
|
|
24/07/2016 |
|
|||
|
|
|
24/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/07/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/07/2016 |
|
|
Simulation August 2016
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
August 2016 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
06/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
28/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/08/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/08/2016 |
|
|
Simulation September 2016
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
September 2016 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
06/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
5 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 642. John.OBrien@met.pnn / Page Numbers: 2500 Professional
Standard Office – IPCC! Brixton
Case / Met Police! Broadsure
Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank / Canopius! |
14/09/2016 |
|
|
|
5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 642. John.OBrien@met.pnn /
Page Numbers: 2500, From: John.O'Brien@met.pnn.police.uk
Sent: 14 September 2016 19:34 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Complaint against police Dear
Ms Cordell/Mr Benjamin Ø I am DC Durward’s line manager. Ø DC Durward is currently engaged
on another matter outside London but will be returning late this week/early
next week. Ø I note that you are due an update
on the matter being investigated. Ø DC Durward is nearing completion
of his extensive report which has been made a priority in his workload. Ø Once completed, this will be
forwarded for final decision by a senior officer. Ø A copy of the report will be sent
to you at this stage. Ø I am anticipating that this
matter will shortly be concluded. Yours
sincerely, John
O'Brien Detective
Sergeant Directorate
of Professional Standards SMIU Tel:02071615051
785051 Mobile: 07768036446 E Mail: John.O'Brien@met.police.uk 22nd Floor
Empress State Buildings, Lillie Road SW61TR Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find
us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter:
@metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
15/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
28/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/09/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/09/2016 |
|
|
Simulation October 2016
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
October 2016 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
06/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
28/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/10/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/10/2016 |
|
|
Simulation November 2016
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
November 2016 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
15/11/2016 |
|||
|
|
|
16/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
7 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 658. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ IPCC / Page
Numbers: 2555, 8 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 659. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ IPCC 01 / Page Numbers: 2556, |
18/11/2016 |
|
|
|
7 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 658. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ IPCC / Page
Numbers: 2555, From: Lorraine
Cordell [Lorraine_] Sent: 18
November 2016 15:51 To: Lorraine
Cordell (lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk) Subject: RE: IPCC Attachments: SiIPPCAppealReply01_redacted.pdf Ø
here 8 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 659. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ IPCC 01 / Page
Numbers: 2556, From: Lorraine
Cordell [Lorraine_] Sent: 18
November 2016 15:57 To: Lorraine
Cordell (lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk) Subject: RE: IPCC 01 Attachments: Si IPPC Appeal Reply.pdf Ø
here |
||||
|
|
|
19/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
5 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 660. Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn _ (24) / Page Numbers: 2557 |
21/11/2016 |
|
|
|
5 The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 660. Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn _ (24) / Page Numbers: 2557 From:
Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk Sent:
21
November 2016 14:46 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
complaint
against police Good afternoon Lorraine, Ø Apologies for missing your
telephone call. Ø I am aware that the IPCC have
directed a re‐investigation into Simon’s complaints. Ø I moved to a different unit
within the Directorate of Professional Standards a number of months ago and
so this case will be assigned to a different investigating officer (IO). Ø There does not appear to be a new
IO assigned at this time but as soon as an officer receives the case, Ø they will establish contact with
you and discuss how they intend to proceed. Ø Please be assured that an officer
will be in touch with you in due course. Regards Jeanette Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable |
Appeals Unit | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 782253 | Telephone 020 7161
2253 | | Fax 020 7161 6798 |Email Address Empress State Building, 22nd
Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Total Policing is the Met's
commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders,
prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you
to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do
not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
22/11/2016 |
|||
|
|
|
23/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
26/11/2016 |
|||
|
|
|
27/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/11/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/11/2016 |
|
|
Simulation December 2016
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
December 2016 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
06/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
28/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/12/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/12/2016 |
|
|
Simulation January 2017
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
January 2017 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 708.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ PC_6804_13_ (9) /
Page Numbers: 2769, 3 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 709. Lorraine
Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (31) / Page Numbers: 2770, |
22/01/2017 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 708. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ PC_6804_13_ (9) / Page Numbers: 2769, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 January 2017 12:56 To: jamie.newman@met.police.uk Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie Newman Ø I believe you are the person
taking over the reinvestigation of the case PC/6804/13. Ø Could you please tell me how far
you got with the reinvestigation? Ø Also, could all contact be made
via this email as I am the one dealing with this for my son Mr. Simon
Cordell. Regards Lorraine Cordell 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 709. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (31) / Page Numbers: 2770, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 January 2017 13:09 To: 'Martin Jenkin' Subject:
RE: Simon Cordell Dear Martin Ø As you know the case in 2013
when the police lied to KGM about my Son Simon Cordell, this case is still
ongoing under complaint re the police officer. Ø As part of their investigation,
they were meant to have contacted you to get a report of the 1st phone call
that was made on that day which was to you by Simon where Simon passed his
phone to the police officer for you to speak to and you told the police
officer Simon was insured and the police officer never said anything about
any tools. Ø It was after this the police
officer felt the need to contact KGM and say what he did to make Simon
insurance void so he could do what he wanted. Ø This was not done by the 1st
investigation and a reinvestigation in now ongoing. I was wondering if you
kept the audio of phone calls made to Broadsure and if so, could a copy be
made of that call. Ø If not, could you write something
up so it could be passed to the investigating officer. Ø As I sure notes should still be
on file. Ø If you could get back to me in
regards to this I would be most grateful. Regards Lorraine Cordell |
||||
|
|
|
23/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 714.!
North Casework _IPCC - Further Information Acknowledgement
- 2015_049718 / Page Numbers: 2778, |
24/01/2017 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 714.! North Casework _IPCC - Further Information Acknowledgement - 2015_049718 / Page Numbers: 2778, From: North Casework [NorthCasework@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 24 January 2017 10:12 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' Subject:
IPCC Further Information Acknowledgement 2015/049718 Our Reference No: 2015/049718 Force Reference No: PC/2108/15 Dear Ms Cordell, Ø I confirm that we have received
your email dated 23 January 2017. Ø The information has been saved to
your case file for review by the person who will deal with your case once it
is allocated. Yours
sincerely, James Bromley Casework Administrator Independent
Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) PO Box 473 Sale M33 0BW Tel: 0161 246 8502 Email: northcasework@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk IPCC Statutory Guidance on the handling of police
complaints Twitter: @IPCC
News and @IPCC _enquiries |
||||
|
|
|
25/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
27/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/01/2017 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 715.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn
_ (22) / Page Numbers: 2779,2780,2781, |
30/01/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 715. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn _ (22) / Page Numbers: 2779, Sent: 30 January 2017 12:56 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms Cordell, Ø I hope this email finds you well. Ø Have you had a chance to look at
the document attached to my last email? Kind regards Jamie Newman Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) |
Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 23 January 2017
13:58 To: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional
Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie Newman Ø Yes, I am dealing with on behalf
of my son have been from the start. Ø So, if everything can be done via
this email, I would be grateful. Ø I will look at the attached
document today, but do believe you have had contact with Martin Jerkins and
he confirms that the Police officer did not say about any tools or Mr Cordell
going around doing odd jobs on that call. Ø As the police officer did when he
made the call to KGM. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 23 January 2017
10:24 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Good Morning, Ø You are correct, I am to re‐investigate
the matter. Ø I look forward to working with
you to bring this matter to a satisfactory conclusion. Ø Early in December I wrote to Mr
Cordell though received no reply. Ø I wrote to him again in early
January though again received no reply. Ø If you’re dealing with this
matter on his behalf then that explains it. Ø Am I to assume I’m to communicate
with you going forward? Ø I’ve attached the letter I sent
to Mr Cordell. I’d appreciate it if you could respond to my request at your
earliest convenience. Ø Any questions please do ask. 2780, Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 January 2017
12:56 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø I believe you are the
person taking over the reinvestigation of the case PC/6804/13. Ø Could you please tell
me how far you got with the reinvestigation? Ø Also, could all contact
be made via this email as I am the one dealing with this for my son Mr. Simon
Cordell. Regards Lorraine
Cordell Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement
on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook. 2781, Consider
our environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter:
@metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
|
31/01/2017 |
|
|
|
4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 716.x2... Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ PC_6804_13 / Page Numbers: 2782,2783,2784,2785, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 January 2017 10:37 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie Newman, Ø Thank you for the below email. Ø I believe you have spoken to Martin Jenkins and he
has confirmed with you that when Mr. Cordell was spoken to by the police
officer, Mr Cordell used his phone to call Martin Jenkins and Martin Jenkins
confirmed he told the police officer Mr Cordell was insured to drive, and
also the police officer never said anything about any tools to him on that
phone call. Ø I also made calls that day as my
son also called me what was going on. Ø I have asked many times to see a
copy of the police officer note book, as until I saw the report from Jeanette
Reilly, and it was confirmed the police officer did in fact have a note book,
Mr Cordell always said he took notes but the police officer even said in
court he never and it was only the ticket he had used that day. Ø The reason for asking for a copy
is due to the fact of the name my son give and it is stated in his note book
a name was given, then it seemed to change to Mr Cordell saying he was
homeless, but the police officer would have done checks of the name given,
which I believe the note book proves my son give his correct name as there
was no reason for him not to have done as he never done anything wrong. Ø and this would have been
confirmed when the police officer done his police checks. Ø There is also one other issue and
that is when Mr Cordell asked for an inspector to be called due to what the
police officer had said to the insurance company. Ø Mr Cordell was telling the
inspector that the police officer had lied to his insurance company about
tools being in the vane, all it would have took was for the inspector to
check the van at that time, he would have then seen something was really
wrong as there was no tools and would have seen this, and this could have
been addressed there and then without the need for my son to have been
arrested. Ø If there is anything you need for
me please let me know. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 30 January 2017 12:56 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms Cordell, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Have you had a chance
to look at the document attached to my last email? Kind
regards Jamie Newman
Serious
Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards
| Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 23 January 2017 13:58 To: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ
Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: PC/ 6804/13 2783,2784,2785, |
||||
Simulation February 2017
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
February 2017 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 726.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ PC_6804_13_ (1) /
Page Numbers: 2808,2809,2810,2811,2812, 2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 728.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn
_ (3) / Page Numbers: 2813,2814,2815,2816,2817,2818, 3 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 729.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Subject Access Request Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 2819, 4 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 730.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Subject Access Request Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 2820, |
03/02/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 726. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ PC_6804_13_ (1) / Page Numbers: 2808,2809,2810,2811,2812, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February 2017 10:03 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie Newman Ø Sorry for the late reply to the
below email the last days I have been up the hospital having tests done due
to illness, but I will pull out the file I was sent over the weekend as it
was put away, Ø I think in my loft so will need
to get someone to go up and get it from my file boxes up there this weekend. Ø I will get this over to you as
soon as I can. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 01 February 2017 08:40 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms Cordell, Ø Thank you very much for your
email, the content of which is very illustrative. Ø I can confirm I have made contact
with Mr Jenkins and can also confirm according to Mr Jenkin’s recollection
the officer did not mention their being tools in Simon’s van. Ø Regarding the officer’s notebook,
as you’re aware the officer did make use of one on the day in question, of
course its content will form part of my investigation. Ø Going forward, I note that in
their appeal findings the IPCC made direct reference to a transcript in your
possession concerning a phone call between Broadsure Direct and KGM. Ø Can you please send me a copy? Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 | Telephone
0207 161 6675 | Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 January 2017
10:37 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman, Ø Thank you for the below email. Ø I believe you have spoken to Martin Jenkins and he
has confirmed with you that when Mr. Cordell was spoken to by the
police officer, Mr Cordell used his phone to call Martin Jenkins and Martin
Jenkins confirmed he told the police officer Mr Cordell was insured to drive,
and also the police officer never said anything about any tools to him on
that phone call. Ø I also made calls that
day as my son also called me what was going on. Ø I have asked many times
to see a copy of the police officer note book, as until I saw the report from
Jeanette Reilly, and it was confirmed the police officer did in fact have a
note book, Mr Cordell always said he took notes but the police officer even
said in court he never and it was only the ticket he had used that day. Ø The reason for asking
for a copy is due to the fact of the name my son give and it is stated in his
note book a name was given, then it seemed to change to Mr Cordell saying he
was homeless, but the police officer would have done checks of the name
given, which I believe the note book proves my son give his correct name as
there was no reason for him not to have done as he never done anything wrong.
Ø and this would have
been confirmed when the police officer done his police checks. Ø There is also one other
issue and that is when Mr Cordell asked for an inspector to be called due to
what the police officer had said to the insurance company. Ø Mr Cordell was telling
the inspector that the police officer had lied to his insurance company about
tools being in the vane, all it would have took was for the inspector to
check the van at that time, he would have then seen something was really
wrong as there was no tools and would have seen this, and this could have
been addressed there and then without the need for my son to have been
arrested. Ø If there is anything
you need for me please let me know. 2809,2810,2811,2812, 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 728. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn _ (3) / Page Numbers: 2813,2814,2815,2816,2817,2818, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 03 February 2017
12:11 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Lorraine, Ø I am sorry to hear you’ve been
ill. Ø No problem at all, more than
willing to wait in the circumstances. Ø Enjoy your weekend. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 | Telephone 0207 161 6675 | Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February
2017 10:03 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Sorry for the late
reply to the below email the last days I have been up the hospital having
tests done due to illness, but I will pull out the file I was sent over the
weekend as it was put away, Ø I think in my loft so
will need to get someone to go up and get it from my file boxes up there this
weekend. Ø I will get this over to
you as soon as I can. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 01 February
2017 08:40 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms
Cordell, Ø Thank you very much for
your email, the content of which is very illustrative. Ø I can confirm I have
made contact with Mr Jenkins and can also confirm according to Mr Jenkin’s
recollection the officer did not mention their being tools in Simon’s van. Ø Regarding the officer’s
notebook, as you’re aware the officer did make use of one on the day in
question, of course its content will form part of my investigation. Ø Going forward, I note
that in their appeal findings the IPCC made direct reference to a transcript
in your possession concerning a phone call between Broadsure Direct and KGM. Ø Can you please send me
a copy? 2814, Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675
| Telephone 0207 161 6675 | Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 January 2017
10:37 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman, Ø Thank you for the below email. Ø I believe you have spoken to Martin Jenkins and he
has confirmed with you that when Mr. Cordell was spoken to by the
police officer, Mr Cordell used his phone to call Martin Jenkins and Martin
Jenkins confirmed he told the police officer Mr Cordell was insured to drive,
and also the police officer never said anything about any tools to him on
that phone call. Ø I also made calls that
day as my son also called me what was going on. Ø I have asked many times
to see a copy of the police officer note book, as until I saw the report from
Jeanette Reilly, and it was confirmed the police officer did in fact have a
note book, Mr Cordell always said he took notes but the police officer even
said in court he never and it was only the ticket he had used that day. Ø The reason for asking for
a copy is due to the fact of the name my son give and it is stated in his
note book a name was given, then it seemed to change to Mr Cordell saying he
was homeless, but the police officer would have done checks of the name
given, which I believe the note book proves my son give his correct name as
there was no reason for him not to have done as he never done anything wrong.
Ø and this would have
been confirmed when the police officer done his police checks. Ø There is also one other
issue and that is when Mr Cordell asked for an inspector to be called due to
what the police officer had said to the insurance company. Ø Mr Cordell was telling
the inspector that the police officer had lied to his insurance company about
tools being in the vane, all it would have took was for the inspector to
check the van at that time, he would have then seen something was really
wrong as there was no tools and would have seen this, and this could have
been addressed there and then without the need for my son to have been arrested.
Ø If there is anything
you need for me please let me know. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 30 January 2017
12:56 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms
Cordell, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Have you had a chance
to look at the document attached to my last email? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman Serious
Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards
| Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR Kind regards 2815,2816,2817,2818, 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 729. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Subject Access Request Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 2819, From: Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February
2017 14:16 To: 'info@broadsuredirect.com' Subject: Re: Subject
Access Request Simon Cordell Attachments: Subject
access request Broadsure Direct.pdf To Whom It
May Concern: Ø Please see attached
document regarding a subject access request I would like address while
Broadsure Direct was dealing with my insurance. Ø If this email with
attachment has been sent to the wrong department that deals with data
protection subject access requests could this please be passed to the correct
department that deals with it? Ø If there is a fee
payable or you need ID can someone let me know as soon as possible via this
email address. Could you also let me know via this email address this email
has been received along with the attachment? Regards Simon Cordell 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 730. Lorraine Cordell
_Re_ Subject Access Request Simon Cordell_ (1) / Page Numbers: 2820, From: Lorraine
Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February
2017 16:22 To: 'customer.relationswmg@coveainsurance.co.uk' Subject: RE: Subject
Access Request Simon Cordell Attachments: Subject access
request Covéa Insurance.pdf To Whom It
May Concern: Ø Please see attached
document regarding a subject access request I would like address while
Broadsure Direct was dealing with my insurance. Ø If this email with
attachment has been sent to the wrong department that deals with data
protection subject access requests could this please be passed to the correct
department that deals with it? Ø If there is a fee
payable or you need ID can someone let me know as soon as possible via this
email address. Could you also let me know via this email address this email
has been received along with the attachment? Regards Simon
Cordell |
||||
|
|
|
04/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
27/02/2017 |
|||
|
|
|
27/02/2017 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 762.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn
_ (4) / Page Numbers: 2994,2995,2996,2997,2998,2999, |
28/02/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 762. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn (4) / Page Numbers: 2994,2995,2996,2997,2998,2999, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 28 February 2017 08:01 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms Cordell, Ø I hope this email finds you well.
Ø Have you managed to retrieve the
transcript from your loft? Ø Or failing that have you a
timescale for doing so? Ø I appreciate you’ve been ill
lately. Ø Any issues please do get in
touch. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February
2017 10:03 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Sorry for the late
reply to the below email the last days I have been up the hospital having
tests done due to illness, but I will pull out the file I was sent over the
weekend as it was put away, Ø I think in my loft so
will need to get someone to go up and get it from my file boxes up there this
weekend. Ø I will get this over to
you as soon as I can. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 01 February
2017 08:40 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms
Cordell, Ø Thank you very much for
your email, the content of which is very illustrative. Ø I can confirm I have
made contact with Mr Jenkins and can also confirm according to Mr Jenkin’s
recollection the officer did not mention their being tools in Simon’s van. Ø Regarding the officer’s
notebook, as you’re aware the officer did make use of one on the day in
question, of course its content will form part of my investigation. Ø Going forward, I note
that in their appeal findings the IPCC made direct reference to a transcript
in your 2995, possession
concerning a phone call between Broadsure Direct and KGM. Ø Can you please send me
a copy? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 January 2017
10:37 To: Newman Jamie
M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman, Ø Thank you for the below email. Ø I believe you have spoken to Martin Jenkins and he
has confirmed with you that when Mr. Cordell was spoken to by the
police officer, Mr Cordell used his phone to call Martin Jenkins and Martin
Jenkins confirmed he told the police officer Mr Cordell was insured to drive,
and also the police officer never said anything about any tools to him on
that phone call. Ø I also made calls that
day as my son also called me what was going on. Ø I have asked many times
to see a copy of the police officer note book, as until I saw the report from
Jeanette Reilly, and it was confirmed the police officer did in fact have a
note book, Mr Cordell always said he took notes but the police officer even
said in court he never and it was only the ticket he had used that day. Ø The reason for asking
for a copy is due to the fact of the name my son give and it is stated in his
note book a name was given, then it seemed to change to Mr Cordell saying he
was homeless, but the police officer would have done checks of the name
given, which I believe the note book proves my son give his correct name as
there was no reason for him not to have done as he never done anything wrong.
Ø and this would have
been confirmed when the police officer done his police checks. Ø There is also one other
issue and that is when Mr Cordell asked for an inspector to be called due to
what the police officer had said to the insurance company. Ø Mr Cordell was telling the
inspector that the police officer had lied to his insurance company about
tools being in the vane, all it would have took was for the inspector to
check the van at that time, he would have then seen something was really
wrong as there was no tools and would have seen this, and this could have
been addressed there and then without the need for my son to have been
arrested. Ø If there is anything
you need for me please let me know. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 30 January 2017
12:56 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms
Cordell, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Have you had a chance
to look at the document attached to my last email? 2996, Kind
regards Jamie
Newman Serious
Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards
| Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 23 January 2017
13:58 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Yes, I am dealing with
on behalf of my son have been from the start. Ø So, if everything can be
done via this email, I would be grateful. Ø I will look at the
attached document today, but do believe you have had contact with Martin
Jerkins and he confirms that the Police officer did not say about any tools
or Mr Cordell going around doing odd jobs on that call. Ø As the police officer
did when he made the call to KGM. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 23 January 2017
10:24 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Good
Morning, Ø You are correct, I am
to re‐investigate the matter. Ø I look forward to working
with you to bring this matter to a satisfactory conclusion. Ø Early in December I
wrote to Mr Cordell though received no reply. Ø I wrote to him again in
early January though again received no reply. Ø If you’re dealing with
this matter on his behalf then that explains it. Ø Am I to assume I’m to
communicate with you going forward? Ø I’ve attached the
letter I sent to Mr Cordell. I’d appreciate it if you could respond to my
request at your earliest convenience. Ø Any questions please do
ask. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 January 2017
12:56 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk 2997, Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø I believe you are the
person taking over the reinvestigation of the case PC/6804/13. Ø Could you please tell
me how far you got with the reinvestigation? Ø Also, could all contact
be made via this email as I am the one dealing with this for my son Mr. Simon
Cordell. Regards Lorraine
Cordell Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider
our environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This
email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or
legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you
must not distribute or copy the 2998, information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only 2999, specified
personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the
MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements
reached with other employees or agents. The security of this email and any
attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but
malicious software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter:
@metpolice.uk |
||||
Simulation March 2017
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
March 2017 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
6 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 773.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ PC_6804_13_ (2) Page Numbers: 3095,3096,3097,3098,3099,3100, |
21/03/2017 |
|
|
|
6 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 773. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ PC_6804_13_ (2) / Page Numbers: 3095,3096,3097,3098,3099,3100, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 March 2017 19:26 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie Newman Ø I would like to apologise the
late reply to your email, Ø I've had some major issues, the
ceiling come down in my front room, Ø I then had to have my boiler
changed everything went seriously wrong with this also. Ø I have a number of health problems
and had to end up having two operations, Ø I only got released from hospital
on 17 March 2017, Ø I have got someone coming around
this weekend to get the file from the loft I did not forget this needed to be
done, so you should have it by Saturday or Sunday as I will scan it in and
send it straight over to you as soon as I get my hands on it. Ø Once again like to apologise for
the late reply. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 28 February
2017 08:01 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms
Cordell, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Have you managed to
retrieve the transcript from your loft? Ø Or failing that have
you a timescale for doing so? Ø I appreciate you’ve
been ill lately. Ø Any issues please do
get in touch. Kind regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February
2017 10:03 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Sorry for the late
reply to the below email the last days I have been up the hospital having
tests done due to illness, but I will pull out the file I was sent over the
weekend as it was put away, Ø I think in my loft so
will need to get someone to go up and get it from my file boxes up there this
weekend. Ø I will get this over to
you as soon as I can. Regards Lorraine 3085,3086,3087,3088,3089,3090,3091,3092,3093,3094, |
||||
|
|
|
22/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 776.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn _
(5) / Page Numbers: 3106,3107,3108,3109,3110,3111,3112, |
24/03/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 776. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn _ (5) / Page Numbers: 3106,3107,3108,3109,3110,3111,3112, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 24 March 2017 15:00 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Lorraine, Ø I apologise for my delayed reply. Ø Good to hear from you. Ø No problem at all, Ø I’m sorry to hear you’ve had so
many issues as of late, sounds like you’re having a stressful time of it. Ø I’ll await an email from you over
the weekend, or as soon as you’re able thereafter. Ø Please don’t stress, it’s okay. Ø If you’ve any questions or
concerns in the interim please do get in touch. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 March 2017
19:26 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø I would like to
apologise the late reply to your email, Ø I've had some major
issues, the ceiling come down in my front room, Ø I then had to have my
boiler changed everything went seriously wrong with this also. Ø I have a number of
health problems and had to end up having two operations, Ø I only got released
from hospital on 17 March 2017, Ø I have got someone
coming around this weekend to get the file from the loft I did not forget
this needed to be done, so you should have it by Saturday or Sunday as I will
scan it in and send it straight over to you as soon as I get my hands on it. Ø Once again like to
apologise for the late reply. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 28 February
2017 08:01 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms
Cordell, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Have you managed to
retrieve the transcript from your loft? Ø Or failing that have
you a timescale for doing so? 3107, Ø I appreciate you’ve
been ill lately. Ø Any issues please do
get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February
2017 10:03 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Sorry for the late
reply to the below email the last days I have been up the hospital having
tests done due to illness, but I will pull out the file I was sent over the
weekend as it was put away, Ø I think in my loft so
will need to get someone to go up and get it from my file boxes up there this
weekend. Ø I will get this over to
you as soon as I can. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 01 February
2017 08:40 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms
Cordell, Ø Thank you very much for
your email, the content of which is very illustrative. Ø I can confirm I have
made contact with Mr Jenkins and can also confirm according to Mr Jenkin’s
recollection the officer did not mention their being tools in Simon’s van. Ø Regarding the officer’s
notebook, as you’re aware the officer did make use of one on the day in
question, of course its content will form part of my investigation. Ø Going forward, I note
that in their appeal findings the IPCC made direct reference to a transcript
in your possession concerning a phone call between Broadsure Direct and KGM. Ø Can you please send me
a copy? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and
upholding standards without fear or favor’ 3108,3109,3110,3111,3112, |
||||
|
|
|
25/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
27/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/03/2017 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 779.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ PC_6804_13_ (3) /
Page Numbers: 3125,3126,3127,3128,3129,3130,3131, |
31/03/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 779. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ PC_6804_13_ (3) / Page Numbers: 3125,3126,3127,3128,3129,3130,3131, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 March 2017 12:35 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Attachments:
KGM01.pdf Dear
Jamie Newman Ø Sorry for the delay it took
longer to find the folder in the loft then I was hoping as I have a lot up
there. Please see attached document. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 24 March 2017
15:00 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Lorraine, Ø I apologise for my
delayed reply. Ø Good to hear from you. Ø No problem at all, Ø I’m sorry to hear
you’ve had so many issues as of late, sounds like you’re having a stressful
time of it. Ø I’ll await an email
from you over the weekend, or as soon as you’re able thereafter. Ø Please don’t stress,
it’s okay. Ø If you’ve any questions
or concerns in the interim please do get in touch. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct
Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State
Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and
upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 March 2017
19:26 To: Newman Jamie
M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie Newman Ø I would like to
apologise the late reply to your email, Ø I've had some major
issues, the ceiling come down in my front room, Ø I then had to have my
boiler changed everything went seriously wrong with this also. Ø I have a number of
health problems and had to end up having two operations, Ø I only got released
from hospital on 17 March 2017, Ø I have got someone
coming around this weekend to get the file from the loft I did not forget
this needed to be done, so you should have it by Saturday or Sunday as I will
scan it in and send it straight over to you as soon as I get my hands on it. Ø Once again like to
apologise for the late reply. 3126,3127,3128,3129,3130,3131, |
||||
Simulation April 2017
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
April 2017 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 780.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn
_ (6) / Page Numbers: 3143,3144,3145,3146,3147,3148,3149,3150, |
07/04/2017 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 780. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn _ (6) / Page Numbers: 3143,3144,3145,3146,3147,3148,3149,3150, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 07 April 2017 09:47 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Good Morning Lorraine, Ø Many apologies for my delayed
reply. Ø Thank you for providing the
transcript, very much appreciated. Ø In the coming weeks I shall commence
my reinvestigation, of course I’ll keep you updated throughout. Ø If you have any questions in the
interim please do get in touch. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 March 2017
12:35 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Sorry for the delay it
took longer to find the folder in the loft then I was hoping as I have a lot
up there. Please see attached document. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 24 March 2017
15:00 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø I apologise for my
delayed reply. Ø Good to hear from you. Ø No problem at all, Ø I’m sorry to hear
you’ve had so many issues as of late, sounds like you’re having a stressful
time of it. Ø I’ll await an email
from you over the weekend, or as soon as you’re able thereafter. Ø Please don’t stress,
it’s okay. Ø If you’ve any questions
or concerns in the interim please do get in touch. 3144,3145,3146,3147,3148,3149,3150, |
||||
|
|
|
08/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
27/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/04/2017 |
|
|
|
|
||||
Simulation May 2017
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
May 2017 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
06/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 784.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn
_ (7) / Page Numbers: 3164,3165,3166,3167,3168,3169,3170,3171,3172, |
08/05/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 784. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn _ (7) / Page Numbers: 3164,3165,3166,3167,3168,3169,3170,3171,3172, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 08 May 2017 15:23 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
PC/6804/13 Hello Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds you well.
Ø I write to provide you with an
update. Ø I have begun to review the
original investigation and associated material; Ø I hope to be able to report back
to you soon with my findings though am unable to give a timeframe at present.
Ø When I have a better idea, Ø I shall of course update you
further. Ø If you’ve any questions or
concerns at all please do get in touch. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 07 April 2017
09:47 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Good
Morning Lorraine, Ø Many apologies for my
delayed reply. Ø Thank you for providing
the transcript, very much appreciated. Ø In the coming weeks I
shall commence my reinvestigation, of course I’ll keep you updated
throughout. Ø If you have any
questions in the interim please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 March 2017
12:35 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie Newman 3165, Ø Sorry for the delay it
took longer to find the folder in the loft then I was hoping as I have a lot
up there. Please see attached document. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 24 March 2017
15:00 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø I apologise for my delayed
reply. Ø Good to hear from you. Ø No problem at all, Ø I’m sorry to hear
you’ve had so many issues as of late, sounds like you’re having a stressful
time of it. Ø I’ll await an email
from you over the weekend, or as soon as you’re able thereafter. Ø Please don’t stress,
it’s okay. Ø If you’ve any questions
or concerns in the interim please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the
bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 March 2017
19:26 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø I would like to
apologise the late reply to your email, Ø I've had some major
issues, the ceiling come down in my front room, Ø I then had to have my
boiler changed everything went seriously wrong with this also. Ø I have a number of
health problems and had to end up having two operations, Ø I only got released
from hospital on 17 March 2017, Ø I have got someone
coming around this weekend to get the file from the loft I did not forget
this needed to be done, so you should have it by Saturday or Sunday as I will
scan it in and send it straight over to you as soon as I get my hands on it. Ø Once again like to
apologise for the late reply. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 28
February 2017 08:01 3166,3167,3168,3169,3170,3171,3172, |
||||
|
|
|
09/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
27/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/05/2017 |
|
|
|
|
||||
Simulation June 2017
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
June 2017 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
06/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
6 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 786.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn
_ (8) / Page Numbers: 3189,3190,3191,3192,3193,3194,3195,3196,3197, |
09/06/2017 |
|
|
|
6 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 786. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn _ (8) / Page Numbers: 3189,3190,3191,3192,3193,3194,3195,3196,3197, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 09 June 2017 17:26 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
PC/6804/13 Hello Lorraine, Ø I have reviewed the original
investigation and associated material and wonder if you or Mr Cordell would
find it useful to meet with me before I commence my report? Ø Or are you happy that your appeal
letter and subsequent IPCC appeal outcome covers everything? Ø N.B., I hope to submit my report
by the end of July. Ø I appreciate this matter has been
ongoing for some time, for that I apologise. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 08 May 2017
15:23 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø I write to provide you
with an update. Ø I have begun to review
the original investigation and associated material; Ø I hope to be able to
report back to you soon with my findings though am unable to give a timeframe
at present. Ø When I have a better
idea, Ø I shall of course
update you further. Ø If you’ve any questions
or concerns at all please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 07 April 2017
09:47 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Good Morning Lorraine, 3190, Ø Many apologies for my
delayed reply. Ø Thank you for providing
the transcript, very much appreciated. Ø In the coming weeks I
shall commence my reinvestigation, of course I’ll keep you updated
throughout. Ø If you have any
questions in the interim please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 March 2017
12:35 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 From Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Sorry for the delay it
took longer to find the folder in the loft then I was hoping as I have a lot
up there. Please see attached document. Regards Lorraine
Cordell Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 24 March 2017
15:00 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø I apologise for my
delayed reply. Ø Good to hear from you. Ø No problem at all, Ø I’m sorry to hear you’ve
had so many issues as of late, sounds like you’re having a stressful time of
it. Ø I’ll await an email
from you over the weekend, or as soon as you’re able thereafter. Ø Please don’t stress,
it’s okay. Ø If you’ve any questions
or concerns in the interim please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State
Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 3191, 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 March 2017
19:26 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø I would like to
apologise the late reply to your email, Ø I've had some major
issues, the ceiling come down in my front room, Ø I then had to have my
boiler changed everything went seriously wrong with this also. Ø I have a number of
health problems and had to end up having two operations, Ø I only got released
from hospital on 17 March 2017, Ø I have got someone
coming around this weekend to get the file from the loft I did not forget
this needed to be done, so you should have it by Saturday or Sunday as I will
scan it in and send it straight over to you as soon as I get my hands on it. Ø Once again like to
apologise for the late reply. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 28 February
2017 08:01 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms
Cordell, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Have you managed to
retrieve the transcript from your loft? Ø Or failing that have
you a timescale for doing so? Ø I appreciate you’ve
been ill lately. Ø Any issues please do
get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine Cordell
[mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 03 February
2017 10:03 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Sorry for the late
reply to the below email the last days I have been up the hospital having
tests done due to illness, but I will pull out the file I was sent over the
weekend as it was put away, Ø I think in my loft so
will need to get someone to go up and get it from my file boxes up there this
weekend. Ø I will get this over to
you as soon as I can. Regards 3192, Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 01 February
2017 08:40 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms
Cordell, Ø Thank you very much for
your email, the content of which is very illustrative. Ø I can confirm I have
made contact with Mr Jenkins and can also confirm according to Mr Jenkin’s recollection
the officer did not mention their being tools in Simon’s van. Ø Regarding the officer’s
notebook, as you’re aware the officer did make use of one on the day in
question, of course its content will form part of my investigation. Ø Going forward, I note
that in their appeal findings the IPCC made direct reference to a transcript
in your possession concerning a phone call between Broadsure Direct and KGM. Ø Can you please send me
a copy? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress
State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 January 2017
10:37 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman, Ø Thank you for the below email. Ø I believe you have spoken to Martin Jenkins and he
has confirmed with you that when Mr. Cordell was spoken to by the
police officer, Mr Cordell used his phone to call Martin Jenkins and Martin
Jenkins confirmed he told the police officer Mr Cordell was insured to drive,
and also the police officer never said anything about any tools to him on
that phone call. Ø I also made calls that
day as my son also called me what was going on. Ø I have asked many times
to see a copy of the police officer note book, as until I saw the report from
Jeanette Reilly, and it was confirmed the police officer did in fact have a
note book, Mr Cordell always said he took notes but the police officer even
said in court he never and it was only the ticket he had used that day. Ø The reason for asking
for a copy is due to the fact of the name my son give and it is stated in his
note book a name was given, then it seemed to change to Mr Cordell saying he
was homeless, but the police officer would have done checks of the name
given, which I believe the note book proves my son give his correct name as
there was no reason for him not to have done as he never done anything wrong.
Ø and this would have
been confirmed when the police officer done his police checks. Ø There is also one other
issue and that is when Mr Cordell asked for an inspector to be called due to
what the police officer had said to the insurance company. Ø Mr Cordell was telling
the inspector that the police officer had 3193, lied to his insurance company
about tools being in the vane, all it would have took was for the inspector
to check the van at that time, he would have then seen something was really
wrong as there was no tools and would have seen this, and this could have
been addressed there and then without the need for my son to have been
arrested. Ø If there is anything
you need for me please let me know. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 30 January 2017
12:56 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms
Cordell, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Have you had a chance
to look at the document attached to my last email? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman Serious
Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards
| Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 23 January 2017
13:58 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Yes, I am dealing with
on behalf of my son have been from the start. Ø So, if everything can
be done via this email, I would be grateful. Ø I will look at the attached
document today, but do believe you have had contact with Martin Jerkins and
he confirms that the Police officer did not say about any tools or Mr Cordell
going around doing odd jobs on that call. Ø As the police officer
did when he made the call to KGM. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 23 January 2017
10:24 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Good
Morning, Ø You are correct, I am
to re‐investigate the matter. I look forward to 3194, Ø working with you to
bring this matter to a satisfactory conclusion. Ø Early in December I
wrote to Mr Cordell though received no reply. Ø I wrote to him again in
early January though again received no reply. Ø If you’re dealing with
this matter on his behalf then that explains it. Ø Am I to assume I’m to
communicate with you going forward? Ø I’ve attached the
letter I sent to Mr Cordell. I’d appreciate it if you could respond to my
request at your earliest convenience. Ø Any questions please do
ask. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress
State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 January 2017
12:56 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø I believe you are the
person taking over the reinvestigation of the case PC/6804/13. Ø Could you please tell
me how far you got with the reinvestigation? Ø Also, could all contact
be made via this email as I am the one dealing with this for my son Mr. Simon
Cordell. Regards Lorraine
Cordell Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those 3195, of the
Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total Policing
is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch
offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working
with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not
print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot
be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious 3196, software
infection and corruption of content can still occur during transmission over
the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the
Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider
our environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or 3197, opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter:
@metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
|
10/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 787.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ PC_6804_13_ (4) /
Page Numbers: 3199,3200,3201,3202,3203,3204,3205,3206,3207, |
11/06/2017 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 787. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ PC_6804_13_ (4) / Page Numbers: 3199,3200,3201,3202,3203,3204,3205,3206,3207, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 11 June 2017 11:25 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie Newman Ø Maybe it could be good to meet up
and go over everything, before you deal with the report. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 09 June 2017
17:26 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø I have reviewed the
original investigation and associated material and wonder if you or Mr
Cordell would find it useful to meet with me before I commence my report? Ø Or are you happy that
your appeal letter and subsequent IPCC appeal outcome covers everything? Ø N.B., I hope to submit
my report by the end of July. Ø I appreciate this
matter has been ongoing for some time, for that I apologise. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 08 May 2017
15:23 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø I write to provide you
with an update. Ø I have begun to review
the original investigation and associated material; Ø I hope to be able to
report back to you soon with my findings though am unable to give a timeframe
at present. Ø When I have a better
idea, Ø I shall of course
update you further. Ø If you’ve any questions
or concerns at all please do get in touch. Kind regards 3200,3201,3202,3203,3204,3205,3206,3207, |
||||
|
|
3 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 789.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ PC_6804_13_ (5) Page Numbers: 3218,3219,3220,3221,3222,3223,3224,3225,3226,3227, 4 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 788.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn
_ (9) / Page Numbers: 3208,3209,3210,3211,3212,3213,3214,3215,3216,3217, |
12/06/2017 |
|
|
|
3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 789. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ PC_6804_13_ (5) / Page Numbers: 3218,3219,3220,3221,3222,3223,3224,3225,3226,3227, Sent: 12 June 2017 16:05 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie Ø I cannot do the 14/06/2017
as I am at the hospital. Ø And if you could do after 11:00
hours I would be grateful I know I am expecting to have an operation in the
next 4 weeks but I am waiting for a call from hospital with date. Ø And I do sometimes get calls from
the hospital to go there on very short notice but I think we can work around
this. Ø If you can put some dates
together I sure we can work something out. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 12 June 2017 15:58 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Lorraine, Ø No problem at all, tomorrow morning
I’ll sit down and look over my calendar and put forward some suitable dates. Ø Are there any dates or times that
work best for you? Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU)
| Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 11 June 2017
11:25 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Maybe it could be good
to meet up and go over everything, before you deal with the report. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 09 June 2017
17:26 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø I have reviewed the original
investigation and associated material and wonder if you or Mr Cordell would
find it useful to meet with me before I commence my report? Ø Or are you happy that
your appeal letter and subsequent IPCC appeal outcome covers everything? 3219, Ø N.B., I hope to submit
my report by the end of July. Ø I appreciate this
matter has been ongoing for some time, for that I apologise. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 08 May 2017
15:23 To: 'lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø I write to provide you
with an update. Ø I have begun to review
the original investigation and associated material; Ø I hope to be able to report
back to you soon with my findings though am unable to give a timeframe at
present. Ø When I have a better
idea, Ø I shall of course
update you further. Ø If you’ve any questions
or concerns at all please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress
State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 07 April 2017
09:47 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Good
Morning Lorraine, Ø Many apologies for my
delayed reply. Ø Thank you for providing
the transcript, very much appreciated. Ø In the coming weeks I
shall commence my reinvestigation, of course I’ll keep you updated
throughout. Ø If you have any
questions in the interim please do get in touch. Kind regards 3220,3221,3222,3223,3224,3225,3226,3227, 4 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 788. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn _
(9) / Page Numbers: 3208,3209,3210,3211,3212,3213,3214,3215,3216,3217, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 12 June 2017
15:58 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø No problem at all,
tomorrow morning I’ll sit down and look over my calendar and put forward some
suitable dates. Ø Are there any dates or
times that work best for you? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 11 June 2017
11:25 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Maybe it could be good
to meet up and go over everything, before you deal with the report. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 09 June 2017
17:26 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø I have reviewed the
original investigation and associated material and wonder if you or Mr
Cordell would find it useful to meet with me before I commence my report? Ø Or are you happy that
your appeal letter and subsequent IPCC appeal outcome covers everything? Ø N.B., I hope to submit
my report by the end of July. Ø I appreciate this
matter has been ongoing for some time, for that I apologise. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards 3209,3210,3211,3212,3213,3214,3215,3216,3217, |
||||
|
|
|
13/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 790.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn
_ (10) / Page Numbers: 3228,3229,3230,3231,3232,3233,3234,3235,3236,3237,3238,3239, 2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 791.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn
_ (11) / Page Numbers: 3240,3241,3242,3243,3244,3245,3246,3247,3248,3249,3250,3251, |
14/06/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 790. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn _ (10) / Page Numbers: 3228,3229,3230,3231,3232,3233,3234,3235,3236,3237,3238,3239, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 14 June 2017 15:23 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Lorraine, Ø I apologise for my delayed reply.
Ø My proposed dates are below,
please do take your pick. 1)
Monday
26th June 2017 2)
Tuesday
27th June 2017 3)
Wednesday
28th June 2017 4)
Friday
30th June 2017 Ø All at 12pm, or a later time that
suits you. Ø Where would you like to meet? Ø I could attend your home address
or local police station. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 12 June 2017
16:05 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie Ø I cannot do the 14/06/2017
as I am at the hospital. Ø And if you could do
after 11:00 hours I would be grateful I know I am expecting to have an
operation in the next 4 weeks but I am waiting for a call from hospital with
date. Ø And I do sometimes get
calls from the hospital to go there on very short notice but I think we can
work around this. Ø If you can put some
dates together I sure we can work something out. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 12 June 2017
15:58 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø No problem at all,
tomorrow morning I’ll sit down and look over my calendar and put forward some
suitable dates. Ø Are there any dates or
times that work best for you? 3229,3230,3231,3232,3233,3234,3235,3236,3237,3238,3239, 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 791. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn _ (11) / Page Numbers: 3240,3241,3242,3243,3244,3245,3246,3247,3248,3249,3250,3251, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 14 June 2017 15:39 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
PC/6804/13 Hello Lorraine, Ø Sorry to email you again. Ø Something has just come up on the
27th June, other dates still good though. Ø Speak soon. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 14 June 2017
15:23 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø I apologise for my
delayed reply. Ø My proposed dates are
below, please do take your pick. 5) Monday 26th June 2017 6) Tuesday 27th June 2017 7) Wednesday 28th June 2017 8) Friday 30th June 2017 Ø All at 12pm, or a later
time that suits you. Ø Where would you like to
meet? Ø I could attend your
home address or local police station. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress
State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 12 June 2017 16:05 To: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional
Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 3241,3242,3243,3244,3245,3246,3247,3248,3249,3250,3251, George Quinton got involved in assaulting me with his friends! |
||||
|
|
|
15/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
4 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 792. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ PC_6804_13_ (6) / Page
Numbers: 3255,3256,3257,3258,3259,3260,3261,3262,3263,3264,3265,3266, |
16/06/2017 |
|
|
|
4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 792. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
PC_6804_13_ (6) / Page Numbers: 3255,3256,3257,3258,3259,3260,3261,3262,3263,3264,3265,3266, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 16 June 2017 12:21 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie Sorry for the late
reply could we do the Friday 30th June 2017 at 12:00 if that is possible
this can be done at Edmonton police station. If you can let me
know if this is ok for you, I would be most grateful. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 14 June 2017
15:39 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø Sorry to email you
again. Ø Something has just come
up on the 27th June, other dates still good though. Ø Speak soon. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 14 June 2017
15:23 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø I apologise for my
delayed reply. Ø My proposed dates are
below, please do take your pick. 9) Monday 26th June 2017 10) Tuesday 27th June 2017 11) Wednesday 28th June 2017 12) Friday 30th June 2017 Ø All at 12pm, or a later
time that suits you. Ø Where would you like to
meet? Ø I could attend your
home address or local police station. 3256,3257,3258,3259,3260,3261,3262,3263,3264,3265,3266, |
||||
|
|
|
17/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
3 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 793.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn
_ (12) / Page Numbers: 3281,3282,3283,3284,3285, 3286,3287,3288,3289,3290,3291,3292,3293, 4 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 794. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ PC_6804_13_ (7) Page Numbers: 3294,3295,3296,3297,3298, 3299,3300,3301,3302,3303,3304,3305,3306, |
19/06/2017 |
|
|
|
3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 793. Jamie. Newman @met.pnn_ (12) / Page Numbers: 3281,3282,3283,3284,3285,3286,3287,3288,3289,3290,3291,3292,3293, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 19 June 2017 10:02 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Lorraine, Ø Thanks for getting back to me. Ø Sounds good. Ø I’ll secure a room at
Edmonton. Ø See you on Friday 30th June 2017
at 12:00. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 16 June 2017 12:21 To: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional
Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie Ø Sorry for the late reply could we
do the if that is possible this can be done at Edmonton police station. Ø If you can let me know if this is
ok for you, Ø I would be most grateful. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 14 June 2017
15:39 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø Sorry to email you
again. Ø Something has just come
up on the 27th June, other dates still good though. Ø Speak soon. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and
upholding standards without fear or favor’ 3282,3283,3284,3285,3286,3287,3288,3289,3290,3291,3292,3293, 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 794. Lorraine Cordell _Re_
PC_6804_13_ (7) / Page Numbers: 3294,3295,3296,3297,3298,3299,3300,3301,3302,3303,3304,3305,3306, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 19 June 2017 10:08 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject:
RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie Ø Thank you for the reply I will
see you on the 30th June at 12:00. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 19 June 2017
10:02 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello
Lorraine, Ø Thanks for getting back
to me. Ø Sounds good. Ø I’ll secure
a room at Edmonton. Ø See you on Friday 30th
June 2017 at 12:00. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 16 June 2017
12:21 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear Jamie Ø Sorry for the late
reply could we do the if that is possible this can be done at Edmonton police
station. Ø If you can let me know
if this is ok for you, Ø I would be most
grateful. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 14 June 2017 15:39 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
PC/6804/13 Hello Lorraine, 3295,3296,3297,3298,3299,3300,3301,3302,3303,3304,3305,3306, |
||||
|
|
|
20/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
27/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
Error in diary on this date fixed
here! |
28/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
29/06/2017 |
|
|
|
|
4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 797. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police / Page Numbers: 3317,3318, “Moved from diary 28/06/2017 to
here!” |
30/06/2017 |
|
|
|
4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 797. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police / Page Numbers: 3317,3318, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 30 June 2017 17:23 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
Our meeting today. Good Afternoon Lorraine, Ø Thank you for taking the team to
meet with this afternoon, I found our meeting very useful in enabling me to
better understand your complaint. Ø To confirm, the first thing I
shall consider is a referral to the CPS. Ø I shall begin by examining what
consideration was given to such a referral by the previous investigator,
Jeannette Riley. Ø Under the legislation that
governs police complaints it is possible to seek guidance from the CPS where
there is an indication that a criminal offence may have been committed; it is
this test that I shall apply. Ø Leaving the CPS issue aside for a
moment and the possibility of criminal charges, Ø I acknowledge your request to
have sight of the PC Geoghegan’s MG11 and notebook. Ø Such a disclosure can be made
under Schedule 3 of the Police Reform Act 2002. Ø I shall revisit this request once
the possibility of a CPS referral has been addressed. Ø However, I fully intend to comply
with such a request, subject to necessary redactions. Ø Going forward, in addition your
original points of complaint I shall also attempt to provide a clear
explanation for the issues surrounding the misconduct meeting occurring
before you had the opportunity to appeal to the IPCC. Ø As I stated to you earlier today,
the MPS can only apologise for this oversight. Ø Additionally, as agreed, if you
could send me Dean’s details, or forward mine to him, that would be very much
appreciated, of course, Ø I’ll keep you updated every step
of the away. Ø If you’ve any questions in the
meantime please do get in touch. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 | Telephone 0207 161 6675 | Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the
streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support
victims. We are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer.
Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely
necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be confidential,
subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the
use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error,
please notify the sender and delete it from your
system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy
the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those 3318, of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find
us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
Simulation July 2017
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
July 2017 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
06/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/07/2017 |
|
|
|
24/07/201 |
|
|||
|
|
|
24/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/07/2017 |
|
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 798. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police
_ (1) / Page
Numbers: 3321,3322, 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 785. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police
_ (15) / Page Numbers: 3187,3188, -- 9 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 809. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our
meeting today (2) / Page Numbers: 3371,3372,3373, “Moved from diary 28/07/2017 to
here!” |
31/07/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 785. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police (15) / Page Numbers: 3187,3188, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 31 July 2017 14:14 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
Our meeting today. Good Afternoon Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds you well. Ø Further to our meeting last month
I have written to PC G to give him the opportunity to participate in the
reinvestigation, Ø I await his reply. Ø When and if he replies I shall of
course let you know. Ø Regarding a CPS referral, having
reviewed the evidence I am currently of the view that such a referral should
be left to the determination of our Appropriate Authority (A.A. ‐
senior officer who reviews my report) upon the conclusion of the
investigation. Ø As it stands, I see nothing to
prohibit such a referral, should the A.A. think it appropriate. Ø As you know, should the A.A.
elect not to refer the matter to the CPS, Ø you would of course have a right
of appeal to the IPCC along those lines. Ø If you have any questions for me
please do let me know. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 | Telephone 0207 161 6675 | Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 30 June 2017
17:23 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: Our meeting
today. Good
Afternoon Lorraine, Ø Thank you for taking
the team to meet with this afternoon, I found our meeting very useful in
enabling me to better understand your complaint. Ø To confirm, the first
thing I shall consider is a referral to the CPS. Ø I shall begin by
examining what consideration was given to such a referral by the previous
investigator, Jeannette Riley. Ø Under the legislation
that governs police complaints it is possible to seek guidance from the CPS
where there is an indication that a criminal offence may have been committed;
it is this test that I shall apply. Ø Leaving the CPS issue
aside for a moment and the possibility of criminal charges, Ø I acknowledge your
request to have sight of the PC Geoghegan’s MG11 and notebook. Ø Such a disclosure can
be made under Schedule 3 of the Police Reform Act 2002. Ø I shall revisit this
request once the possibility of a CPS referral has been addressed. Ø However, I fully intend
to comply with such a request, subject to necessary redactions. Ø Going forward, in
addition your original points of complaint I shall also attempt to provide a
clear explanation for the issues surrounding the misconduct meeting occurring
before you had the opportunity to appeal to the IPCC. Ø As I stated to you
earlier today, the MPS can only apologise for this oversight. 3188, Ø Additionally, as agreed,
if you could send me Dean’s details, or forward mine to him, that would be
very much appreciated, of course, Ø I’ll keep you updated
every step of the away. Ø If you’ve any questions
in the meantime please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS this email and any
attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but
malicious software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter:
@metpolice.uk 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 798. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police (1) / Page Numbers: 3321,3322, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 31 July 2017
14:14 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Our meeting
today. Good Afternoon
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Further to our meeting
last month I have written to PC G to give him the opportunity to participate
in the reinvestigation, Ø I await his reply. Ø When and if he replies
I shall of course let you know. Ø Regarding a CPS
referral, having reviewed the evidence I am currently of the view that such a
referral should be left to the determination of our Appropriate Authority
(A.A. ‐ senior officer who reviews my report) upon the conclusion of
the investigation. Ø As it stands, I see
nothing to prohibit such a referral, should the A.A. think it appropriate. Ø As you know, should the
A.A. elect not to refer the matter to the CPS, Ø you would of course
have a right of appeal to the IPCC along those lines. Ø If you have any
questions for me please do let me know. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 30 June 2017
17:23 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: Our meeting
today. Good
Afternoon Lorraine, Ø Thank you for taking the
team to meet with this afternoon, I found our meeting very useful in enabling
me to better understand your complaint. Ø To confirm, the first
thing I shall consider is a referral to the CPS. Ø I shall begin by
examining what consideration was given to such a referral by the previous
investigator, Jeannette Riley. Ø Under the legislation
that governs police complaints it is possible to seek guidance from the CPS
where there is an indication that a criminal offence may have been committed;
it is this test that I shall apply. Ø Leaving the CPS issue
aside for a moment and the possibility of criminal charges, Ø I acknowledge your
request to have sight of the PC Geoghegan’s MG11 and notebook. Ø Such a disclosure can
be made under Schedule 3 of the Police Reform Act 2002. Ø I shall revisit this
request once the possibility of a CPS referral has been addressed. Ø However, I fully intend
to comply with such a request, subject to necessary redactions. Ø Going forward, in
addition your original points of complaint I shall also attempt to provide a
clear explanation for the issues surrounding the misconduct meeting occurring
before you had the opportunity to appeal to the IPCC. Ø As I stated to you
earlier today, the MPS can only apologise for this oversight. 3322, Ø Additionally, as
agreed, if you could send me Dean’s details, or forward mine to him, that
would be very much appreciated, of course, Ø I’ll keep you updated
every step of the away. Ø If you’ve any questions
in the meantime please do get in touch. Kind regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ Total Policing
is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch
offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working
with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not
print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk 9 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 809. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our
meeting today (2) / Page Numbers: 3371,3372,3373, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 July 2017 17:43 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Dear Jamie Newman Ø Thank you for the update email
and I also hope you are well; Ø can I ask a few things please now
that you have had time to go over the documents and information. Ø Regarding PC G notebook is my
son's name at the top and has it been checked if a radio check was done on my
son on that day, Ø I find it hard to believe that my
son's name is not in PC G notebook as and my son refused to give his name and
that is why he was arrested, how would he have had my son's details to talk
to the insurance companies which there is no dispute that he did and he would
have needed my son's details to be able to give them to the insurance
companies, which would mean he unlawfully arrested my son. Ø I know you said you would have no
problem giving us the notebook and his statement and other information, does
this mean we cannot get this information until after the investigation is
completed? Ø What will happen if PC G does not
want to assist in this investigation, how long will you give him to reply to
your letter before you decide he is not willing to assist in the
investigation? Ø I know this time we will have the
right to appeal to the IPCC, if we are not happy, but I do believe there is
enough information and I cannot see why the CPS would not want to take this
further, the only reason I can see them not wanting to take this on is due to
PC G is now Head of Criminal Justice, Centre for Social Justice. How long do
you think it will take you to complete the investigation? Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 31 July 2017
14:14 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Our meeting
today. Good
Afternoon Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Further to our meeting
last month I have written to PC G to give him the opportunity to participate
in the reinvestigation, Ø I await his reply. Ø When and if he replies
I shall of course let you know. Ø Regarding a CPS
referral, having reviewed the evidence I am currently of the view that such a
referral should be left to the determination of our Appropriate Authority
(A.A. ‐ senior officer who reviews my report) upon the conclusion of
the investigation. Ø As it stands, I see
nothing to prohibit such a referral, should the A.A. think it appropriate. Ø As you know, should the
A.A. elect not to refer the matter to the CPS, Ø you would of course
have a right of appeal to the IPCC along those lines. Ø If you have any
questions for me please do let me know. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State
Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 3372, 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 30 June 2017
17:23 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: Our meeting
today. Good
Afternoon Lorraine, Ø Thank you for taking
the team to meet with this afternoon, I found our meeting very useful in
enabling me to better understand your complaint. Ø To confirm, the first thing
I shall consider is a referral to the CPS. Ø I shall begin by
examining what consideration was given to such a referral by the previous
investigator, Jeannette Riley. Ø Under the legislation
that governs police complaints it is possible to seek guidance from the CPS
where there is an indication that a criminal offence may have been committed;
it is this test that I shall apply. Ø Leaving the CPS issue
aside for a moment and the possibility of criminal charges, Ø I acknowledge your
request to have sight of the PC Geoghegan’s MG11 and notebook. Ø Such a disclosure can
be made under Schedule 3 of the Police Reform Act 2002. Ø I shall revisit this
request once the possibility of a CPS referral has been addressed. Ø However, I fully intend
to comply with such a request, subject to necessary redactions. Ø Going forward, in
addition your original points of complaint I shall also attempt to provide a
clear explanation for the issues surrounding the misconduct meeting occurring
before you had the opportunity to appeal to the IPCC. Ø As I stated to you
earlier today, the MPS can only apologise for this oversight. Ø Additionally, as
agreed, if you could send me Dean’s details, or forward mine to him, that
would be very much appreciated, of course, Ø I’ll keep you updated
every step of the away. Ø If you’ve any questions
in the meantime please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London,
SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding
standards without fear or favour’ Total Policing is the Met's
commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders,
prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you
to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print
this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments
may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are
intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received
this email in error, please notify the 3373, sender and delete it from your
system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy
the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook:
Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter:
@metpolice.uk |
||||
Simulation August 2017
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
August 2017 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
06/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 811.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police
_ (2) / Page Numbers: 3375,3376,3377,3378, 2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 812.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (14) / Page Numbers: 3379,3380,3381,3382,3383, |
07/08/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 811. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police _ (2) / Page Numbers: 3375,3376,3377,3378, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 07 August 2017 09:44 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Morning Lorraine, Ø Firstly, apologies for my delayed
reply! Ø I had intended to reply much
sooner. Ø I think I’m correct in saying
that the necessity for your son’s arrest was associated with PC G’s
uncertainty as to the address provided. Ø This is something I’ll discuss in
the report. Ø Can I ask, from where did you get
the impression that your son’s name was not in PC G’s pocketbook? Ø To reiterate, I’d be more than
happy share documents with you at the end of the investigation. Ø As per the Police Reform Act,
subject to the harm test. Ø Was there any particular reason
you’d want them sooner? Ø I expect the investigation to
conclude in October incidentally. Ø I was intending on giving PC G
three weeks, what are your thoughts on that? Ø Re PC G’s current occupation, Ø I can assure you it would have no
bearing on this matter whatsoever. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 31 July 2017
17:43 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Thank you for the
update email and I also hope you are well; Ø can I ask a few things
please now that you have had time to go over the documents and information. Ø Regarding PC G notebook
is my son's name at the top and has it been checked if a radio check was done
on my son on that day, Ø I find it hard to believe
that my son's name is not in PC G notebook as and my son refused to give his
name and that is why he was arrested, how would he have had my son's details
to talk to the insurance companies which there is no dispute that he did and
he would have needed my son's details to be able to give them to the
insurance companies, which would mean he unlawfully arrested my son. Ø I know you said you
would have no problem giving us the notebook and his statement and other
information, does this mean we cannot get this information until after the
investigation is completed? Ø What will happen if PC
G does not want to assist in this investigation, how long will you give him
to reply to your letter before you decide he is not willing to assist in the
investigation? Ø I know this time we
will have the right to appeal to the IPCC, if we are not happy, but I do
believe there is enough information and I cannot see why the CPS would not
want to take this further, the only reason I can see them not wanting to take
this on is due to PC G is now Head of Criminal Justice, Centre for Social
Justice. How long do you think it will take you to complete the
investigation? Regards 3376, Lorraine Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 31 July 2017
14:14 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Our meeting
today. Good
Afternoon Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Further to our meeting
last month I have written to PC G to give him the opportunity to participate
in the reinvestigation, Ø I await his reply. Ø When and if he replies
I shall of course let you know. Ø Regarding a CPS
referral, having reviewed the evidence I am currently of the view that such a
referral should be left to the determination of our Appropriate Authority
(A.A. ‐ senior officer who reviews my report) upon the conclusion of
the investigation. Ø As it stands, I see
nothing to prohibit such a referral, should the A.A. think it appropriate. Ø As you know, should the
A.A. elect not to refer the matter to the CPS, Ø you would of course
have a right of appeal to the IPCC along those lines. Ø If you have any
questions for me please do let me know. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 30 June 2017
17:23 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: Our meeting
today. Good
Afternoon Lorraine, Ø Thank you for taking
the team to meet with this afternoon, I found our meeting very useful in
enabling me to better understand your complaint. Ø To confirm, the first
thing I shall consider is a referral to the CPS. Ø I shall begin by
examining what consideration was given to such a referral by the previous
investigator, Jeannette Riley. Ø Under the legislation
that governs police complaints it is possible to seek guidance from the CPS
where there is an indication that a criminal offence may have been committed;
it is this test that I shall apply. Ø Leaving the CPS issue
aside for a moment and the possibility of criminal charges, Ø I acknowledge your
request to have sight of the PC Geoghegan’s MG11 and notebook. Ø Such a disclosure can
be made under Schedule 3 of the Police Reform Act 2002. Ø I shall revisit this
request once the possibility of a CPS referral has been addressed. Ø However, I fully intend
to comply with such a request, subject to necessary redactions. Ø Going forward, in
addition your original points of complaint I shall also attempt to provide a
clear 3377, Ø explanation for the
issues surrounding the misconduct meeting occurring before you had the
opportunity to appeal to the IPCC. Ø As I stated to you
earlier today, the MPS can only apologise for this oversight. Ø Additionally, as
agreed, if you could send me Dean’s details, or forward mine to him, that
would be very much appreciated, of course, Ø I’ll keep you updated
every step of the away. Ø If you’ve any questions
in the meantime please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments
may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are
intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received
this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the
information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright
and/or legal privilege and are 3378, intended
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software
infection and corruption of content can still occur during transmission over
the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the
Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter:
@metpolice.uk 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 812. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (14) / Page Numbers: 3379,3380,3381,3382,3383, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 07 August 2017 17:31 To: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Dear Jamie Ø Thank you for the update reply. Ø Due to never seeing PC G
statement written after what happened on the day, and never having access to
any documents since, Ø I rely on what was said in court
from PC G and also the 1st report after the 1st investigation that the DPS
did, which you are now redoing due to what the IPCC said. Ø PC G stated there was no notebook
in court; he stated Mr Cordell was arrested due to him not giving his
details so they could be confirmed he stated Mr Cordell had said he was
homeless. Ø But Mr Cordell knew there was a
notebook he saw PC G writing in it on the day he was arrested, and knew he
had given his details as if he had not how would PC G have been able to speak
to the insurance companies. Ø In the Crown Court Appeal in went
a lot deeper my son had a barrister and he knew what to ask. Ø When PC G got into trouble after
the audio tapes was played and the judge got really upset due to knowing that
PC G had not told the truth the Judge asked for all documents the police
office had replied on in this case. PC G passed a statement to the judge he
had in his hand that he had been using in court. Ø The judge was not happy with the
statement as there was no date and timed marked, PC G said to the Judge that
the statement he was using was a copy, it was my son barrister said there
seemed to be a time on the back. My son's barrister had also PC G about the
ticket issues and PC G said he did not have it in court, the judge stated at
the start of the hearing he was on the understanding the notebook had been
used. Ø The judge was really not happy
and told PC G to leave the court room but not the court building, and that he
wanted all the original document in court for him to see regarding this case.
Ø The judges heard the summing up
and went out to decide. Ø The CPS went outside in this time
I believe to speak to PC G. Ø As when the Judges came back in
and said my son had won his appeal and that he was not happy with what had
gone on in this case, the CPS stated to the judge this was a paper-based file
case and things get mislaid in this sort of files. Ø The judge asked if the audio
could be kept and placed on file in case it needed to be used later. Ø Which we agreed to, and we then
left the court. It was not until we got the 1st report from the DPS and the
notebook was in there that it was confirmed there was in fact a notebook all
a long so why did PC G lie to us and the judges saying it was only a proforma
and the statement he wrote when he got back to the police station. Ø Until we got the DPS report the only
word we had that PC G used his notebook on that day was my son. Ø And I am sorry but it does not
cut it that PC G could get away with saying his arrest was needed due to
uncertainty as to the address provided. Ø When a person is stopped or
spoken to the police like my son was a radio check would be carried out to
check to see if the person was wanted or anything else. Ø The police have my son's address
on their system so the address my son gave would have been checked and shown
as correct on the police system. Ø My son did not need to lie he
give PC G his insurance cert with no problem he had done nothing wrong, so
would have had no need to give a wrong address as he would know it would have
shown on the police system, why would my son say he was homeless? It was not
my son that lied it was PC G and I believe that has already been proven. Ø I believe 3 weeks is enough time
for PC G to come forward and is acceptable. Ø If the inspector had done his job
when he come to the road side when my son asked if one could have been called
this could have all been avoided, but instead he just went with what the
police officer said 3380, Ø and did not brother to check what
my son was saying. Ø Something always come to mind
here and that is what was written in the subject access request I got back
from my son's insurance company, this was after the time we spent trying to
stop the insurance company cancelling my son's insurance and going to courts.
Ø When I saw this, it hurt as we
knew the police had not told the truth and in the subject access request
there was nothing to say my son was not in the wrong. Ø There was no sorry there was
nothing and this is just wrong. Ø My son was the one that had the
bad mark against his name for a long time until it was proven in the appeal
court, not the police officer and this is still the case to this day the
police officer has done nothing wrong in everyone's eyes when he did do
wrong. Ø He has been allowed to move on in
his life, my son was the one spending all the time to clear his name not the
police officer when my son had done nothing wrong. "[ ...] Which is
obviously ... we're in an awkward situation as well because [Data Subject]
and [Data Subject] mum is constantly ringing us up. Ø They don't understand that
obviously we are going to take a police officer's views over obviously one of
our policyholders because obviously a police officer's job is obviously to
tell the truth and not to lie." Ø This is the action of most
people’s view but in this case the police officer was not telling the truth
my son was. And my son was the one being made to suffer when he had not done
anything wrong. Ø But yet people believe the police
in everything they say. Ø I know you have said PC G's
current occupation; I can assure you it would have no bearing on this
matter whatsoever. Ø Maybe I see it another way his
occupation is Head of Criminal Justice, Centre for Social Justice, can’t you
see the irony in this he is trying to find justice for people, but what he
did in this case was never justice at his own hands, the DPS never served
justice for my son, yet they knew PC G had lied in this whole case, and that
PC G took it to the courts and again never told the truth and perjury himself
two times in a court of law. Ø PC G seems to think this is
acceptable he still applied for his job roll where he is working to make sure
justice is fair for all. Ø I am sure if he had admitted to
breaking the law in what he did he would not be in the position he is in now
I do find this very relevant that is how I feel and my son does. Best Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 07 August 2017
09:44 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Morning
Lorraine, Ø Firstly, apologies for
my delayed reply! Ø I had intended to reply
much sooner. Ø I think I’m correct in
saying that the necessity for your son’s arrest was associated with PC G’s
uncertainty as to the address provided. Ø This is something I’ll
discuss in the report. Ø Can I ask, from where
did you get the impression that your son’s name was not in PC G’s pocketbook? Ø To reiterate, I’d be
more than happy share documents with you at the end of the investigation. Ø As per the Police
Reform Act, subject to the harm test. Ø Was there any
particular reason you’d want them sooner? Ø I expect the
investigation to conclude in October incidentally. Ø I was intending on
giving PC G three weeks, what are your thoughts on that? 3381, Ø Re PC G’s current
occupation, Ø I can assure you it
would have no bearing on this matter whatsoever. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the
bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 July 2017
17:43 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Thank you for the
update email and I also hope you are well; Ø can I ask a few things
please now that you have had time to go over the documents and information. Ø Regarding PC G notebook
is my son's name at the top and has it been checked if a radio check was done
on my son on that day, Ø I find it hard to
believe that my son's name is not in PC G notebook as and my son refused to
give his name and that is why he was arrested, how would he have had my son's
details to talk to the insurance companies which there is no dispute that he
did and he would have needed my son's details to be able to give them to the
insurance companies, which would mean he unlawfully arrested my son. Ø I know you said you
would have no problem giving us the notebook and his statement and other
information, does this mean we cannot get this information until after the
investigation is completed? Ø What will happen if PC
G does not want to assist in this investigation, how long will you give him
to reply to your letter before you decide he is not willing to assist in the
investigation? Ø I know this time we
will have the right to appeal to the IPCC, if we are not happy, but I do
believe there is enough information and I cannot see why the CPS would not
want to take this further, the only reason I can see them not wanting to take
this on is due to PC G is now Head of Criminal Justice, Centre for Social
Justice. How long do you think it will take you to complete the
investigation? Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 31 July 2017
14:14 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Our meeting
today. Good
Afternoon Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Further to our meeting
last month I have written to PC G to give him the opportunity to participate
in the reinvestigation, Ø I await his reply. Ø When and if he replies
I shall of course let you know. Ø Regarding a CPS referral,
having reviewed the evidence I am currently of the view that such a referral
should be left to the determination of our Appropriate Authority (A.A. ‐
senior officer who reviews my report) upon the conclusion of the
investigation. Ø As it stands, I see
nothing to prohibit such a referral, should the A.A. think it appropriate. Ø As you know, should the
A.A. elect not to refer the matter to the CPS, Ø you would of course
have a right of appeal to the IPCC along those lines. Ø If you have any
questions for me please do let me know. 3382,3383, |
||||
|
|
|
08/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 820.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police
_ (3) / Page Numbers: 3420,3421,3422,3423,3424,3425, |
16/08/2017 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 820. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police (3) / Page Numbers: 3420,3421,3422,3423,3424,3425, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 16 August 2017 12:20 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Hello Lorraine, Ø Many apologies again for my
delayed reply, it’s been a busy week or so. Ø I’ve had no response from PC G,
the letter was sent recorded delivery. Ø So far, there’s nothing to say he
no longer resides at the address etc. Ø I’ll keep you updated on that
front. Ø As it stands, should PC G choose
to not assist then presently there is little we could do to compel him to
provide an account in the furtherance of the investigation. Ø I note all of your comments in
your email, Ø I can assure you they will be
taken into account when I come to write my report. Re PC G’s current
occupation, I note your views. Ø All I can say is that my review
of the evidence will be objective and governed by the information available
to me. Ø If you’ve any questions for me at
this stage, as ever, please do put them to me. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 07 August 2017
17:31 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie Ø Thank you for the
update reply. Ø Due to never seeing PC
G statement written after what happened on the day, and never having access
to any documents since, Ø I rely on what was said
in court from PC G and also the 1st report after the 1st investigation that
the DPS did, which you are now redoing due to what the IPCC said. Ø PC G stated there was
no notebook in court; he stated Mr Cordell was arrested due to him not
giving his details so they could be confirmed he stated Mr Cordell had said
he was homeless. Ø But Mr Cordell knew
there was a notebook he saw PC G writing in it on the day he was arrested,
and knew he had given his details as if he had not how would PC G have been
able to speak to the insurance companies. Ø In the Crown Court
Appeal in went a lot deeper my son had a barrister and he knew what to ask. Ø When PC G got into
trouble after the audio tapes was played and the judge got really upset due
to knowing that PC G had not told the truth the Judge asked for all documents
the police office had replied on in this case. PC G passed a statement to the
judge he had in his hand that he had been using in court. Ø The judge was not happy
with the statement as there was no date and timed marked, PC G said to the
Judge that the statement he was using was a copy, it was my son barrister
said there seemed to be a time on the back. My son's barrister had also PC G
about the ticket issues and PC G said he did 3421, not
have it in court, the judge stated at the start of the hearing he was on the
understanding the notebook had been used. Ø The judge was really
not happy and told PC G to leave the court room but not the court building,
and that he wanted all the original document in court for him to see
regarding this case. Ø The judges heard the
summing up and went out to decide. Ø The CPS went outside in
this time I believe to speak to PC G. Ø As when the Judges came
back in and said my son had won his appeal and that he was not happy with
what had gone on in this case, the CPS stated to the judge this was a
paper-based file case and things get mislaid in this sort of files. Ø The judge asked if the
audio could be kept and placed on file in case it needed to be used later. Ø Which we agreed to, and
we then left the court. It was not until we got the 1st report from the DPS
and the notebook was in there that it was confirmed there was in fact a
notebook all a long so why did PC G lie to us and the judges saying it was
only a proforma and the statement he wrote when he got back to the police
station. Ø Until we got the DPS
report the only word we had that PC G used his notebook on that day was my
son. Ø And I am sorry but it
does not cut it that PC G could get away with saying his arrest was needed
due to uncertainty as to the address provided. Ø When a person is
stopped or spoken to the police like my son was a radio check would be
carried out to check to see if the person was wanted or anything else. Ø The police have my
son's address on their system so the address my son gave would have been
checked and shown as correct on the police system. Ø My son did not need to
lie he give PC G his insurance cert with no problem he had done nothing
wrong, so would have had no need to give a wrong address as he would know it
would have shown on the police system, why would my son say he was homeless?
It was not my son that lied it was PC G and I believe that has already been
proven. Ø I believe 3 weeks is
enough time for PC G to come forward and is acceptable. Ø If the inspector had
done his job when he come to the road side when my son asked if one could
have been called this could have all been avoided, but instead he just went
with what the police officer said and did not brother to check what my son
was saying. Ø Something always come
to mind here and that is what was written in the subject access request I got
back from my son's insurance company, this was after the time we spent trying
to stop the insurance company cancelling my son's insurance and going to
courts. Ø When I saw this, it
hurt as we knew the police had not told the truth and in the subject access
request there was nothing to say my son was not in the wrong. Ø There was no sorry
there was nothing and this is just wrong. Ø My son was the one that
had the bad mark against his name for a long time until it was proven in the
appeal court, not the police officer and this is still the case to this day
the police officer has done nothing wrong in everyone's eyes when he did do
wrong. Ø He has been allowed to
move on in his life, my son was the one spending all the time to clear his
name not the police officer when my son had done nothing wrong. "[ ...]
Which is obviously ... we're in an awkward situation as well because [Data
Subject] and [Data Subject] mum is constantly ringing us up. Ø They don't understand
that obviously we are going to take a police officer's views over obviously one
of our policyholders because obviously a police officer's job is obviously to
tell the truth and not to lie." Ø This is the action of
most people’s view but in this case the police officer was not telling the
truth my son was. And my son was the one being made to suffer when he had not
done anything wrong. Ø But yet people believe
the police in everything they say. Ø I know you have said PC
G's current occupation; I can assure you it would have no bearing on
this matter whatsoever. Ø Maybe I see it another
way his occupation is Head of Criminal Justice, Centre for Social Justice,
can’t you see the irony in this he is trying to find justice for people, but
what he did in this case was never justice at his own hands, the DPS never
served justice for my son, yet they knew PC G had lied in this whole case,
and that PC G took it to the courts and again never told the truth and
perjury himself two times in a court of law. Ø PC G seems to think
this is acceptable he still applied for his job roll where he is working to
make sure justice is fair for all. Ø I am sure if he had
admitted to breaking the law in what he did he would not be in the position
he is in now I do find this very relevant that is how I feel and my son does. Best
Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 07 August 2017
09:44 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Morning
Lorraine, Ø Firstly, apologies for
my delayed reply! Ø I had intended to reply
much sooner. Ø I think I’m correct in
saying that the necessity for your son’s arrest was associated with PC G’s
uncertainty as to the address provided. Ø This is something I’ll
discuss in the report. Ø Can I ask, from where
did you get the impression that your son’s name was not in PC G’s pocketbook? Ø To reiterate, I’d be
more than happy share documents with you at the end of the investigation. Ø As per the Police
Reform Act, subject to the harm test. Ø Was there any
particular reason you’d want them sooner? Ø I expect the investigation
to conclude in October incidentally. Ø I was intending on
giving PC G three weeks, what are your thoughts on that? Ø Re PC G’s current
occupation, Ø I can assure you it
would have no bearing on this matter whatsoever. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 July 2017
17:43 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Thank you for the
update email and I also hope you are well; Ø can I ask a few things
please now that you have had time to go over the documents and information. Ø Regarding PC G notebook
is my son's name at the top and has it been checked if a radio check was done
on my son on that day, Ø I find it hard to
believe that my son's name is not in PC G notebook as and my son refused to
give his name and that is why he was arrested, how would he have had my son's
details to talk to the insurance companies which there is no dispute that he
did and he would have needed my son's details to be able to give them to the
insurance companies, which would mean he unlawfully arrested my son. 3423, Ø I know you said you
would have no problem giving us the notebook and his statement and other
information, does this mean we cannot get this information until after the
investigation is completed? Ø What will happen if PC
G does not want to assist in this investigation, how long will you give him
to reply to your letter before you decide he is not willing to assist in the
investigation? Ø I know this time we
will have the right to appeal to the IPCC, if we are not happy, but I do
believe there is enough information and I cannot see why the CPS would not
want to take this further, the only reason I can see them not wanting to take
this on is due to PC G is now Head of Criminal Justice, Centre for Social
Justice. How long do you think it will take you to complete the
investigation? Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 31 July 2017
14:14 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Our meeting
today. Good
Afternoon Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Further to our meeting
last month I have written to PC G to give him the opportunity to participate
in the reinvestigation, Ø I await his reply. Ø When and if he replies
I shall of course let you know. Ø Regarding a CPS
referral, having reviewed the evidence I am currently of the view that such a
referral should be left to the determination of our Appropriate Authority (A.A.
‐ senior officer who reviews my report) upon the conclusion of the
investigation. Ø As it stands, I see
nothing to prohibit such a referral, should the A.A. think it appropriate. Ø As you know, should the
A.A. elect not to refer the matter to the CPS, Ø you would of course
have a right of appeal to the IPCC along those lines. Ø If you have any
questions for me please do let me know. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 30 June 2017
17:23 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: Our meeting
today. Good
Afternoon Lorraine, Ø Thank you for taking
the team to meet with this afternoon, I found our meeting very useful in
enabling me to better understand your complaint. Ø To confirm, the first
thing I shall consider is a referral to the CPS. Ø I shall begin by
examining what 3424, consideration
was given to such a referral by the previous investigator, Jeannette Riley. Ø Under the legislation
that governs police complaints it is possible to seek guidance from the CPS
where there is an indication that a criminal offence may have been committed;
it is this test that I shall apply. Ø Leaving the CPS issue
aside for a moment and the possibility of criminal charges, Ø I acknowledge your
request to have sight of the PC Geoghegan’s MG11 and notebook. Ø Such a disclosure can
be made under Schedule 3 of the Police Reform Act 2002. Ø I shall revisit this
request once the possibility of a CPS referral has been addressed. Ø However, I fully intend
to comply with such a request, subject to necessary redactions. Ø Going forward, in
addition your original points of complaint I shall also attempt to provide a
clear Ø explanation for the
issues surrounding the misconduct meeting occurring before you had the
opportunity to appeal to the IPCC. Ø As I stated to you
earlier today, the MPS can only apologise for this oversight. Ø Additionally, as
agreed, if you could send me Dean’s details, or forward mine to him, that
would be very much appreciated, of course, Ø I’ll keep you updated
every step of the away. Ø If you’ve any questions
in the meantime please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook:
Facebook.com/metpolice.uk 3425, Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter:
@metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
|
17/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
28/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/08/2017 |
|
|
|
|
||||
Simulation September 2017
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
September 2017 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
06/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: Lemmy Nwabuisi RE
Anti-Social Behavior Allegations against Mr. Simon Cordell /
Page Numbers: 2860,2861,2862,2863,2864,2865, 2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 826.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police
_ (4) / Page Numbers: 3436,3437,3438,3439,3440,3441,3442, |
22/09/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The
Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 04 Lemmy Nwabuisi RE Anti-Social Behavior Allegations
against Mr. Simon Cordell / Page Numbers: 2860,2861,2862,2863,2864,2865, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 22 September 2017 16:35 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
Our meeting today. Hello Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds you well.
Ø Alas I’ve heard nothing from PC
G, now I am entertaining the possibility that he may have moved. Ø As such, I will briefly examine
ways in which to confirm any potential new address before going on to write
the report, in my view you’ve waited long enough. Ø What are your thoughts? Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 16 August 2017
12:20 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø Many apologies again
for my delayed reply, it’s been a busy week or so. Ø I’ve had no response
from PC G, the letter was sent recorded delivery. Ø So far, there’s nothing
to say he no longer resides at the address etc. Ø I’ll keep you updated
on that front. Ø As it stands, should PC
G choose to not assist then presently there is little we could do to compel
him to provide an account in the furtherance of the investigation. Ø I note all of your
comments in your email, Ø I can assure you they
will be taken into account when I come to write my report. Re PC G’s current
occupation, I note your views. Ø All I can say is that
my review of the evidence will be objective and governed by the information
available to me. Ø If you’ve any questions
for me at this stage, as ever, please do put them to me. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone 0207
161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] 2861, Sent: 07 August 2017
17:31 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie Ø Thank you for the
update reply. Ø Due to never seeing PC
G statement written after what happened on the day, and never having access
to any documents since, Ø I rely on what was said
in court from PC G and also the 1st report after the 1st investigation that
the DPS did, which you are now redoing due to what the IPCC said. Ø PC G stated there was
no notebook in court; he stated Mr Cordell was arrested due to him not
giving his details so they could be confirmed he stated Mr Cordell had said
he was homeless. Ø But Mr Cordell knew
there was a notebook he saw PC G writing in it on the day he was arrested,
and knew he had given his details as if he had not how would PC G have been
able to speak to the insurance companies. Ø In the Crown Court
Appeal in went a lot deeper my son had a barrister and he knew what to ask. Ø When PC G got into
trouble after the audio tapes was played and the judge got really upset due
to knowing that PC G had not told the truth the Judge asked for all documents
the police office had replied on in this case. PC G passed a statement to the
judge he had in his hand that he had been using in court. Ø The judge was not happy
with the statement as there was no date and timed marked, PC G said to the
Judge that the statement he was using was a copy, it was my son barrister
said there seemed to be a time on the back. My son's barrister had also PC G
about the ticket issues and PC G said he did not have it in court, the judge
stated at the start of the hearing he was on the understanding the notebook
had been used. Ø The judge was really
not happy and told PC G to leave the court room but not the court building,
and that he wanted all the original document in court for him to see
regarding this case. Ø The judges heard the
summing up and went out to decide. Ø The CPS went outside in
this time I believe to speak to PC G. Ø As when the Judges came
back in and said my son had won his appeal and that he was not happy with
what had gone on in this case, the CPS stated to the judge this was a
paper-based file case and things get mislaid in this sort of files. Ø The judge asked if the
audio could be kept and placed on file in case it needed to be used later. Ø Which we agreed to, and
we then left the court. It was not until we got the 1st report from the DPS
and the notebook was in there that it was confirmed there was in fact a
notebook all a long so why did PC G lie to us and the judges saying it was
only a proforma and the statement he wrote when he got back to the police
station. Ø Until we got the DPS
report the only word we had that PC G used his notebook on that day was my
son. Ø And I am sorry but it
does not cut it that PC G could get away with saying his arrest was needed
due to uncertainty as to the address provided. Ø When a person is
stopped or spoken to the police like my son was a radio check would be
carried out to check to see if the person was wanted or anything else. Ø The police have my
son's address on their system so the address my son gave would have been
checked and shown as correct on the police system. Ø My son did not need to
lie he give PC G his insurance cert with no problem he had done nothing
wrong, so would have had no need to give a wrong address as he would know it
would have shown on the police system, why would my son say he was homeless?
It was not my son that lied it was PC G and I believe that has already been
proven. Ø I believe 3 weeks is
enough time for PC G to come forward and is acceptable. Ø If the inspector had
done his job when he come to the road side when my son asked if one could
have been called this could have all been avoided, but instead he just went
with what the police officer said 2862, and
did not brother to check what my son was saying. Ø Something always come
to mind here and that is what was written in the subject access request I got
back from my son's insurance company, this was after the time we spent trying
to stop the insurance company cancelling my son's insurance and going to
courts. Ø When I saw this, it
hurt as we knew the police had not told the truth and in the subject access
request there was nothing to say my son was not in the wrong. Ø There was no sorry
there was nothing and this is just wrong. Ø My son was the one that
had the bad mark against his name for a long time until it was proven in the
appeal court, not the police officer and this is still the case to this day
the police officer has done nothing wrong in everyone's eyes when he did do
wrong. Ø He has been allowed to
move on in his life, my son was the one spending all the time to clear his
name not the police officer when my son had done nothing wrong. "[ ...]
Which is obviously ... we're in an awkward situation as well because [Data
Subject] and [Data Subject] mum is constantly ringing us up. Ø They don't understand
that obviously we are going to take a police officer's views over obviously
one of our policyholders because obviously a police officer's job is
obviously to tell the truth and not to lie." Ø This is the action of
most people’s view but in this case the police officer was not telling the
truth my son was. And my son was the one being made to suffer when he had not
done anything wrong. Ø But yet people believe
the police in everything they say. Ø I know you have said PC
G's current occupation; I can assure you it would have no bearing on
this matter whatsoever. Ø Maybe I see it another
way his occupation is Head of Criminal Justice, Centre for Social Justice,
can’t you see the irony in this he is trying to find justice for people, but
what he did in this case was never justice at his own hands, the DPS never
served justice for my son, yet they knew PC G had lied in this whole case,
and that PC G took it to the courts and again never told the truth and
perjury himself two times in a court of law. Ø PC G seems to think
this is acceptable he still applied for his job roll where he is working to
make sure justice is fair for all. Ø I am sure if he had
admitted to breaking the law in what he did he would not be in the position
he is in now I do find this very relevant that is how I feel and my son does. Best
Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 07 August 2017
09:44 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Morning
Lorraine, Ø Firstly, apologies for
my delayed reply! Ø I had intended to reply
much sooner. Ø I think I’m correct in
saying that the necessity for your son’s arrest was associated with PC G’s
uncertainty as to the address provided. Ø This is something I’ll
discuss in the report. Ø Can I ask, from where
did you get the impression that your son’s name was not in PC G’s pocketbook? Ø To reiterate, I’d be more
than happy share documents with you at the end of the investigation. Ø As per the Police
Reform Act, subject to the harm test. Ø Was there any
particular reason you’d want them sooner? Ø I expect the
investigation to conclude in October incidentally. Ø I was intending on
giving PC G three weeks, what are your thoughts on that? 2863, Ø Re PC G’s current
occupation, Ø I can assure you it
would have no bearing on this matter whatsoever. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 31 July 2017
17:43 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Thank you for the
update email and I also hope you are well; Ø can I ask a few things
please now that you have had time to go over the documents and information? Ø Regarding PC G notebook
is my son's name at the top and has it been checked if a radio check was done
on my son on that day, Ø I find it hard to believe
that my son's name is not in PC G notebook as and my son refused to give his
name and that is why he was arrested, how would he have had my son's details
to talk to the insurance companies which there is no dispute that he did and
he would have needed my son's details to be able to give them to the
insurance companies, which would mean he unlawfully arrested my son. Ø I know you said you
would have no problem giving us the notebook and his statement and other
information, does this mean we cannot get this information until after the
investigation is completed? Ø What will happen if PC
G does not want to assist in this investigation, how long will you give him
to reply to your letter before you decide he is not willing to assist in the
investigation? Ø I know this time we
will have the right to appeal to the IPCC, if we are not happy, but I do
believe there is enough information and I cannot see why the CPS would not
want to take this further, the only reason I can see them not wanting to take
this on is due to PC G is now Head of Criminal Justice, Centre for Social
Justice. How long do you think it will take you to complete the
investigation? Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 31 July 2017
14:14 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Our meeting
today. Good
Afternoon Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Further to our meeting
last month I have written to PC G to give him the opportunity to participate
in the reinvestigation, Ø I await his reply. Ø When and if he replies
I shall of course let you know. Ø Regarding a CPS
referral, having reviewed the evidence I am currently of the view that such a
referral should be left to the determination of our Appropriate Authority
(A.A. ‐ senior officer who reviews my report) upon the conclusion of
the investigation. Ø As it stands, I see
nothing to prohibit such a referral, should the A.A. think it appropriate. 2864, Ø As you know, should the
A.A. elect not to refer the matter to the CPS, Ø you would of course
have a right of appeal to the IPCC along those lines. Ø If you have any
questions for me please do let me know. Kind
regards Jamie Newman
| Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional
Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 30 June 2017
17:23 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: Our meeting
today. Good
Afternoon Lorraine, Ø Thank you for taking
the team to meet with this afternoon, I found our meeting very useful in
enabling me to better understand your complaint. Ø To confirm, the first
thing I shall consider is a referral to the CPS. Ø I shall begin by
examining what consideration was given to such a referral by the previous
investigator, Jeannette Riley. Ø Under the legislation
that governs police complaints it is possible to seek guidance from the CPS
where there is an indication that a criminal offence may have been committed;
it is this test that I shall apply. Ø Leaving the CPS issue
aside for a moment and the possibility of criminal charges, Ø I acknowledge your
request to have sight of the PC Geoghegan’s MG11 and notebook. Ø Such a disclosure can
be made under Schedule 3 of the Police Reform Act 2002. Ø I shall revisit this
request once the possibility of a CPS referral has been addressed. Ø However, I fully intend
to comply with such a request, subject to necessary redactions. Ø Going forward, in
addition your original points of complaint I shall also attempt to provide a
clear Ø explanation for the
issues surrounding the misconduct meeting occurring before you had the
opportunity to appeal to the IPCC. Ø As I stated to you
earlier today, the MPS can only apologise for this oversight. Ø Additionally, as agreed,
if you could send me Dean’s details, or forward mine to him, that would be
very much appreciated, of course, Ø I’ll keep you updated
every step of the away. Ø If you’ve any questions
in the meantime please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ Total Policing is the Met's
commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, 2865 prevent
crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make
our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not print this email
unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement
on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total Policing
is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch
offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working
with you to make our capital safer. Consider
our environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter:
@metpolice.uk 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 826. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police _
(4) / Page Numbers: 3436,3437,3438,3439,3440,3441,3442, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 22
September 2017 16:35 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Alas I’ve heard nothing
from PC G, now I am entertaining the possibility that he may have moved. Ø As such, I will briefly
examine ways in which to confirm any potential new address before going on to
write the report, in my view you’ve waited long enough. Ø What are your thoughts? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 16 August 2017
12:20 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø Many apologies again for
my delayed reply, it’s been a busy week or so. Ø I’ve had no response
from PC G, the letter was sent recorded delivery. Ø So far, there’s nothing
to say he no longer resides at the address etc. Ø I’ll keep you updated
on that front. Ø As it stands, should PC
G choose to not assist then presently there is little we could do to compel
him to provide an account in the furtherance of the investigation. Ø I note all of your
comments in your email, Ø I can assure you they
will be taken into account when I come to write my report. Re PC G’s current
occupation, I note your views. Ø All I can say is that
my review of the evidence will be objective and governed by the information
available to me. Ø If you’ve any questions
for me at this stage, as ever, please do put them to me. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From:
Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] 3437, Sent: 07 August 2017
17:31 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie Ø Thank you for the
update reply. Ø Due to never seeing PC
G statement written after what happened on the day, and never having access
to any documents since, Ø I rely on what was said
in court from PC G and also the 1st report after the 1st investigation that
the DPS did, which you are now redoing due to what the IPCC said. Ø PC G stated there was
no notebook in court; he stated Mr Cordell was arrested due to him not
giving his details so they could be confirmed he stated Mr Cordell had said
he was homeless. Ø But Mr Cordell knew
there was a notebook he saw PC G writing in it on the day he was arrested,
and knew he had given his details as if he had not how would PC G have been
able to speak to the insurance companies. Ø In the Crown Court
Appeal in went a lot deeper my son had a barrister and he knew what to ask. Ø When PC G got into
trouble after the audio tapes was played and the judge got really upset due
to knowing that PC G had not told the truth the Judge asked for all documents
the police office had replied on in this case. PC G passed a statement to the
judge he had in his hand that he had been using in court. Ø The judge was not happy
with the statement as there was no date and timed marked, PC G said to the
Judge that the statement he was using was a copy, it was my son barrister
said there seemed to be a time on the back. My son's barrister had also PC G
about the ticket issues and PC G said he did not have it in court, the judge
stated at the start of the hearing he was on the understanding the notebook had
been used. Ø The judge was really
not happy and told PC G to leave the court room but not the court building,
and that he wanted all the original document in court for him to see
regarding this case. Ø The judges heard the
summing up and went out to decide. Ø The CPS went outside in
this time I believe to speak to PC G. Ø As when the Judges came
back in and said my son had won his appeal and that he was not happy with
what had gone on in this case, the CPS stated to the judge this was a
paper-based file case and things get mislaid in this sort of files. Ø The judge asked if the
audio could be kept and placed on file in case it needed to be used later. Ø Which we agreed to, and
we then left the court. It was not until we got the 1st report from the DPS
and the notebook was in there that it was confirmed there was in fact a
notebook all a long so why did PC G lie to us and the judges saying it was
only a proforma and the statement he wrote when he got back to the police
station. Ø Until we got the DPS
report the only word we had that PC G used his notebook on that day was my
son. Ø And I am sorry but it
does not cut it that PC G could get away with saying his arrest was needed
due to uncertainty as to the address provided. Ø When a person is
stopped or spoken to the police like my son was a radio check would be
carried out to check to see if the person was wanted or anything else. Ø The police have my
son's address on their system so the address my son gave would have been
checked and shown as correct on the police system. Ø My son did not need to
lie he give PC G his insurance cert with no problem he had done nothing
wrong, so would have had no need to give a wrong address as he would know it
would have shown on the police system, why would my son say he was homeless?
It was not my son that lied it was PC G and I believe that has already been
proven. Ø I believe 3 weeks is
enough time for PC G to come forward and is acceptable. Ø If the inspector had
done his job when he come to the road side when my son asked if one could
have been called this could have all been avoided, but instead he just went
with what the police officer said and
did not brother to check what my son was saying. Ø Something always come
to mind here and that is what was written in the subject access request I got
back from my son's insurance company, this was after the time we spent trying
to stop the insurance company cancelling my son's insurance and going to
courts. Ø When I saw this, it
hurt as we knew the police had not told the truth and in the subject access
request there was nothing to say my son was not in the wrong. Ø There was no sorry
there was nothing and this is just wrong. Ø My son was the one that
had the bad mark against his name for a long time until it was proven in the
appeal court, not the police officer and this is still the case to this day
the police officer has done nothing wrong in everyone's eyes when he did do
wrong. Ø He has been allowed to
move on in his life, my son was the one spending all the time to clear his
name not the police officer when my son had done nothing wrong. "[ ...]
Which is obviously ... we're in an awkward situation as well because [Data
Subject] and [Data Subject] mum is constantly ringing us up. Ø They don't understand
that obviously we are going to take a police officer's views over obviously one
of our policyholders because obviously a police officer's job is obviously to
tell the truth and not to lie." Ø This is the action of
most people’s view but in this case the police officer was not telling the
truth my son was. And my son was the one being made to suffer when he had not
done anything wrong. Ø But yet people believe
the police in everything they say. Ø I know you have said PC
G's current occupation; I can assure you it would have no bearing on
this matter whatsoever. Ø Maybe I see it another way
his occupation is Head of Criminal Justice, Centre for Social Justice, can’t
you see the irony in this he is trying to find justice for people, but what
he did in this case was never justice at his own hands, the DPS never served
justice for my son, yet they knew PC G had lied in this whole case, and that
PC G took it to the courts and again never told the truth and perjury himself
two times in a court of law. Ø PC G seems to think
this is acceptable he still applied for his job roll where he is working to
make sure justice is fair for all. Ø I am sure if he had
admitted to breaking the law in what he did he would not be in the position
he is in now I do find this very relevant that is how I feel and my son does. 3438,3439,3440,3441,3442, |
||||
|
|
|
23/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 827.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (13) / Page Numbers: 3443,3444,3445,3446,3447,3448,3449, |
24/09/2017 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 827. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (13) / Page Numbers: 3443,3444,3445,3446,3447,3448,3449, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 24 September 2017 15:52 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Hello Jamie Ø Maybe you can send to his work
email I believe this is his work email address rory.geoghegan@centreforsocialjustice.org.uk Ø well, that's what it says when I
do a Google search on his name. Ø Maybe you could also get a phone
number for him there not sure; but if you sent to his work email you
would know he got it or if you called and was able to talk to him you would
know if he even wanted to help in this, maybe he has had the letters but know
he does not need to help if he does not want to, maybe send someone round to
the address you have. Ø This is just some ideas not sure
if you can use them. Regards Lorraine Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 22
September 2017 16:35 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Alas I’ve heard nothing
from PC G, now I am entertaining the possibility that he may have moved. Ø As such, I will briefly
examine ways in which to confirm any potential new address before going on to
write the report, in my view you’ve waited long enough. Ø What are your thoughts? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 16 August 2017
12:20 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø Many apologies again
for my delayed reply, it’s been a busy week or so. Ø I’ve had no response
from PC G, the letter was sent recorded delivery. Ø So far, there’s nothing
to say he no longer resides at the address etc. Ø I’ll keep you updated
on that front. Ø As it stands, should PC
G choose to not assist then presently there is little we could do to compel
him to provide an account in the furtherance of the investigation. Ø I note all of your
comments in your email, Ø I can assure you they
will be taken into account when I come to write my report. Re PC G’s current
occupation, I note your views. Ø All I can say is that
my review of the evidence will be objective and governed by the information
available to me. Ø If you’ve any questions
for me at this stage, as ever, please do put them to me. 3444,3445,3446,3447,3448,3449, |
||||
|
|
|
25/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 828.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police _
(5) / Page
Numbers: 3450,3451,3452,3453,3454,3455,3456,3457, |
26/09/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 828. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police _ (5) / Page Numbers: 3450,3451,3452,3453,3454,3455,3456,3457, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 September 2017 08:33 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Morning Lorraine, Ø Thanks for your reply,
appreciated. Ø You’re right, we don’t know for sure
that he has not received the letter, even if he had moved, he may have had
his post re‐directed etc. Ø I had considered contacting him
at his workplace and is stands it does seem like the most efficient way to
proceed. Ø I shall discuss the matter with my
inspector and revert to you with a decision. Ø Speak soon Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 24
September 2017 15:52 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello Jamie Ø Maybe you can send to
his work email I believe this is his work email address rory.geoghegan@centreforsocialjustice.org.uk Ø well, that's what it
says when I do a Google search on his name. Ø Maybe you could also
get a phone number for him there not sure; but if you sent to his work
email you would know he got it or if you called and was able to talk to him
you would know if he even wanted to help in this, maybe he has had the
letters but know he does not need to help if he does not want to, maybe send
someone round to the address you have. Ø This is just some ideas
not sure if you can use them. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 22
September 2017 16:35 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Alas I’ve heard nothing
from PC G, now I am entertaining the possibility that he may have moved. Ø As such, I will briefly
examine ways in which to confirm any potential new address before going on to
write the report, in my view you’ve waited long enough. Ø What are your thoughts? 3451,3452,3453,3454,3455,3456,3457, |
||||
|
|
|
27/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
28/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/09/2017 |
|
|
|
|
||||
Simulation October 2017
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
October 2017 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
06/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 840.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police _
(6) / Page
Numbers: 3486,3487,3488,3489,3490,3491,3492,3493, |
26/10/2017 |
|
|
|
2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 840. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police _ (6) / Page Numbers: 3486,3487,3488,3489,3490,3491,3492,3493, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 October 2017 13:43 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Hello Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds you well. Ø I apologise for the delay in
providing you with an update. Ø Over the past few days, Ø I have been discussing this
matter with my supervisor, Ø we hope to conclude our
discussions tomorrow upon which I’ll be able to provide you with a more
meaningful update. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 24 September
2017 15:52 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello Jamie Ø Maybe you can send to his
work email I believe this is his work email address rory.geoghegan@centreforsocialjustice.org.uk Ø well, that's what it
says when I do a Google search on his name. Ø Maybe you could also get
a phone number for him there not sure; but if you sent to his work email
you would know he got it or if you called and was able to talk to him you
would know if he even wanted to help in this, maybe he has had the letters
but know he does not need to help if he does not want to, maybe send someone
round to the address you have. Ø This is just some ideas
not sure if you can use them. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 22
September 2017 16:35 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Alas I’ve heard nothing
from PC G, now I am entertaining the possibility that he may have moved. Ø As such, I will briefly
examine ways in which to confirm any potential new address before going on to
write the report, in my view you’ve waited long enough. Ø What are your thoughts? 3487, Kind
regards Jamie Newman
| Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional
Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 16 August 2017
12:20 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø Many apologies again
for my delayed reply, it’s been a busy week or so. Ø I’ve had no response from
PC G, the letter was sent recorded delivery. Ø So far, there’s nothing
to say he no longer resides at the address etc. Ø I’ll keep you updated
on that front. Ø As it stands, should PC
G choose to not assist then presently there is little we could do to compel
him to provide an account in the furtherance of the investigation. Ø I note all of your
comments in your email, Ø I can assure you they
will be taken into account when I come to write my report. Re PC G’s current
occupation, I note your views. Ø All I can say is that
my review of the evidence will be objective and governed by the information
available to me. Ø If you’ve any questions
for me at this stage, as ever, please do put them to me. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 07 August 2017
17:31 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie Ø Thank you for the
update reply. Ø Due to never seeing PC
G statement written after what happened on the day, and never having access
to any documents since, Ø I rely on what was said
in court from PC G and also the 1st report after the 1st investigation that
the DPS did, which you are now redoing due to what the IPCC said. Ø PC G stated there was
no notebook in court; he stated Mr Cordell was arrested due to him not
giving his details so they could be confirmed he stated Mr Cordell had said
he was homeless. Ø But Mr Cordell knew
there was a notebook he saw PC G writing in it on the day he was arrested,
and knew he had given his details as if he had not how would PC G have been
able to speak to the insurance companies. 3488,3489,3490,3491,3492,3493, |
||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 841.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today /
Page Numbers: 3494,3495,3496,3497,3498,3499,3500,3501,3502, |
27/10/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 841. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today / Page Numbers: 3494,3495,3496,3497,3498,3499,3500,3501,3502, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 27 October 2017 21:26 To: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Dear Jamie Newman Ø Thank you for the update I hope
you are well. Ø I was wondering if there is any
update, Ø I think you have given PC G enough
time in order to address this and work with you in this matter which it seems
so far, he has failed to do so. Ø It has been 3 months since you
sent the recorded letter and you have not heard anything Ø and I believe that in itself
shows he is not willing to address this. Ø I know by past the DPS would not
have given us so long to reply they would have just gone ahead without us to
complete their report. Ø I know a lot of years was spent
on the 1st investigation and overall, Ø this has now been ongoing since 2013
when this started, it is now 5 years in Nov 2017 this case has been on
going I know some of this was due to the DPS not being able to do anything as
court action was ongoing, but this court action should have never started in
the 1st place. Ø In fact, this whole thing should
never have happened if PC G had done his job correctly. Ø Could I please get an update as
to where we are and how long this is going to take as you did state I should
have the report by October 2017 but I can’t see this happening now due
to the time you have waited for PC G, which I do not think is fair. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 October 2017
13:43 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø I apologise for the
delay in providing you with an update. Ø Over the past few days,
Ø I have been discussing
this matter with my supervisor, Ø we hope to conclude our
discussions tomorrow upon which I’ll be able to provide you with a more
meaningful update. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress
State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 24 September
2017 15:52 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello Jamie 3495, Ø Maybe you can send to his
work email I believe this is his work email address rory.geoghegan@centreforsocialjustice.org.uk Ø well, that's what it
says when I do a Google search on his name. Ø Maybe you could also get
a phone number for him there not sure; but if you sent to his work email
you would know he got it or if you called and was able to talk to him you
would know if he even wanted to help in this, maybe he has had the letters
but know he does not need to help if he does not want to, maybe send someone
round to the address you have. Ø This is just some ideas
not sure if you can use them. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 22
September 2017 16:35 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Alas I’ve heard nothing
from PC G, now I am entertaining the possibility that he may have moved. Ø As such, I will briefly
examine ways in which to confirm any potential new address before going on to
write the report, in my view you’ve waited long enough. Ø What are your thoughts? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 16 August 2017
12:20 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø Many apologies again
for my delayed reply, it’s been a busy week or so. Ø I’ve had no response
from PC G, the letter was sent recorded delivery. Ø So far, there’s nothing
to say he no longer resides at the address etc. Ø I’ll keep you updated
on that front. Ø As it stands, should PC
G choose to not assist then presently there is little we could do to compel
him to provide an account in the furtherance of the investigation. Ø I note all of your
comments in your email, Ø I can assure you they
will be taken into account when I come to write my report. Re PC G’s current
occupation, I note your views. Ø All I can say is that
my review of the evidence will be objective and governed by the information
available to me. Ø If you’ve any questions
for me at this stage, as ever, please do put them to me. 3496,3497,3498,3499,3500,3501,3502, |
||||
|
|
28/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/10/2017 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 842.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police
_ (7) / Page Numbers: 3503,3504,3505,3506,3507,3508,3509,3510,3511,3512, 2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 843.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (1) / Page Numbers: 3513,3514,3515,3516,3517,3518,3519,3520,3521,3522,3523, |
31/10/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 842. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police _ (7) / Page Numbers: 3503,3504,3505,3506,3507,3508,3509,3510,3511,3512, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 31 October 2017 09:10 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Hello Lorraine, Ø I apologise for my delayed reply.
Ø I appreciate your concerns re
timeliness. Ø As you know I discussed this
matter with my supervisor last week. Ø Being the matter of greatest
importance to you I first discussed the possibility of a CPS referral prior
to the matter being sent to our appropriate authority for a final
determination. Ø Here, my supervisor was not of
the mind to refer the matter to the CPS, citing that PC G’s actions likely
did not constitute a criminal offence. I understand this will come as a
disappointment to you, however our appropriate authority may still decide the
matter should be referred to the CPS upon the conclusion of the re‐investigation,
of course, should this not be the case you will still have a right of appeal
to the IPCC on this issue. Ø Going forward, I do not propose
to continue to seek a further account from PC G, instead I shall set to work
on completing the report with the information I have in my possession. Ø Here I note your wish for the
matter to be concluded quickly and the potential benefit that such a further
account would add to the investigation. Ø Although it is difficult to give
definitive timescales, Ø I hope to have the report
completed by the end of November. Ø As previously promised, as per
your requests under the Police Reform Act, upon the completion of the report
I shall send out a copy of PC G’s notebook, together with any other documents
that may be of interest to you. Ø If you’ve any further questions
please do get in touch. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 27 October 2017
21:26 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Thank you for the
update I hope you are well. Ø I was wondering if
there is any update, Ø I think you have given
PC G enough time in order to address this and work with you in this matter
which it seems so far, he has failed to do so. Ø It has been 3 months
since you sent the recorded letter and you have not heard anything Ø and I believe that in
itself shows he is not willing to address this. Ø I know by past the DPS
would not have given us so long to reply they would have just gone ahead
without us to complete their report. 3504, Ø I know a lot of years
was spent on the 1st investigation and overall, Ø this has now been
ongoing since 2013 when this started, it is now 5 years in Nov 2017
this case has been on going I know some of this was due to the DPS not being
able to do anything as court action was ongoing, but this court action should
have never started in the 1st place. Ø In fact, this whole
thing should never have happened if PC G had done his job correctly. Ø Could I please get an
update as to where we are and how long this is going to take as you did state
I should have the report by October 2017 but I can’t see this happening
now due to the time you have waited for PC G, which I do not think is fair. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 October 2017
13:43 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø I apologise for the
delay in providing you with an update. Ø Over the past few days,
Ø I have been discussing
this matter with my supervisor, Ø we hope to conclude our
discussions tomorrow upon which I’ll be able to provide you with a more
meaningful update. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 24
September 2017 15:52 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello Jamie Ø Maybe you can send to
his work email I believe this is his work email address rory.geoghegan@centreforsocialjustice.org.uk Ø well, that's what it
says when I do a Google search on his name. Ø Maybe you could also
get a phone number for him there not sure; but if you sent to his work
email you would know he got it or if you called and was able to talk to him
you would know if he even wanted to help in this, maybe he has had the
letters but know he does not need to help if he does not want to, maybe send
someone round to the address you have. Ø This is just some ideas
not sure if you can use them. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 22
September 2017 16:35 3505,3506,3507,3508,3509,3510,3511,3512, 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 843. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (1) / Page Numbers: 3513,3514,3515,3516,3517,3518,3519,3520,3521,3522,3523, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 31 October 2017 15:55 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Dear Jamie Newman Ø Thank you for the update. Ø What I cannot understand is how
your supervisor could say PC G’s actions likely did not constitute a criminal
offence. Ø PC G wrote his statement around 2
hours after this took place, knowing he left facts out so he had a case
against my son to take him to court, thinking we could not get the audio
recording which you have copies off, now from what I know he wrote down the
person name he spoke to in his notebook, Ø and I believe that would be in
his notebook, Ø and I believe when a police officer
is writing his statement, he would also use his notebook to make sure he did
not forget anything in his statement, so how could he have written the
statement the way he did forgetting so much out? Ø Maybe it was because he knew we
had already put a complaint in? Ø I am sorry but a police officer
would not forget what he said to the insurance company when he lied to them
to void Mr Cordell's insurance which he nearly did. Ø He then carried on with the lies
to take my son to court, and due to us not having the recordings at that 1st
hearing my son was found guilty due to these lies, and PC G lying in court. Ø We then took it to appeal, but
this time I did have the audio tapes, he stood in that court and admitted he
had not even searched the van, but yet he told the insurance company there
was loads of tools and Mr Cordell was going round doing odd jobs, so know he
lied to my son's insurance company, in the lower court to get my son found
guilty, then lied in the Crown Court at the appeal hearing, how much more
lies is needed so it would be classed as a criminal offence? Ø At the appeal hearing if we did
not have them audio tapes, I am 100% my son would have been found guilty
again. Ø If this was my son that done this
and not a police officer my son would have been charged and would have had to
face the courts and would likely have gone to prison, because Judges do not
like any person lying in their courts. Ø I am upset as I do know if this
was my son who did this he would have been charged by the CPS and had to face
a court, why is it when the police do something wrong nothing ever happens. Ø I do know I will have the right
to Appeal to the IPCC once I get your report, but if this investigation was
done correct the 1st time and the DPS did not breach their own codes of
conduct to allow this police officer off with a slap on the hands and by not
giving us the right of appeal before this was done and I had been allowed to
take this to the IPCC before this process happened, this police officer would
have not been allowed to leave the police force as he would have been under
investigation still. Ø As it stands this police officer
who lied in 2 courts, wrote a statement that was not the truth and full
facts, has now been able to get a job as head of criminal justice. Ø Please explain how what this
police officer done would not constitute a criminal offence? Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 31 October 2017
09:10 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello Lorraine, Ø I apologies for my delayed reply. 3514, Ø I appreciate your
concerns re timeliness. Ø As you know I discussed
this matter with my supervisor last week. Ø Being the matter of greatest
importance to you I first discussed the possibility of a CPS referral prior
to the matter being sent to our appropriate authority for a final
determination. Ø Here, my supervisor was
not of the mind to refer the matter to the CPS, citing that PC G’s actions
likely did not constitute a criminal offence. I understand this will come as
a disappointment to you, however our appropriate authority may still decide
the matter should be referred to the CPS upon the conclusion of the re‐investigation,
of course, should this not be the case you will still have a right of appeal
to the IPCC on this issue. Ø Going forward, I do not
propose to continue to seek a further account from PC G, instead I shall set
to work on completing the report with the information I have in my
possession. Ø Here I note your wish
for the matter to be concluded quickly and the potential benefit that such a
further account would add to the investigation. Ø Although it is
difficult to give definitive timescales, Ø I hope to have the
report completed by the end of November. Ø As previously promised,
as per your requests under the Police Reform Act, upon the completion of the
report I shall send out a copy of PC G’s notebook, together with any other
documents that may be of interest to you. Ø If you’ve any further
questions please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 27 October 2017
21:26 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Thank you for the
update I hope you are well. Ø I was wondering if
there is any update, Ø I think you have given
PC G enough time in order to address this and work with you in this matter
which it seems so far, he has failed to do so. Ø It has been 3 months
since you sent the recorded letter and you have not heard anything Ø and I believe that in
itself shows he is not willing to address this. Ø I know by past the DPS
would not have given us so long to reply they would have just gone ahead
without us to complete their report. Ø I know a lot of years
was spent on the 1st investigation and overall, Ø this has now been
ongoing since 2013 when this started, it is now 5 years in Nov 2017
this case has been on going I know some of this was due to the DPS not being
able to do anything as court action was ongoing, but this court action should
have never started in the 1st place. Ø In fact, this whole
thing should never have happened if PC G had done his job correctly. Ø Could I please get an
update as to where we are and how long this is going to take as you did state
I should have the report by October 2017 but I can’t see this
happening now due to the time you have waited for PC G, which I do not think
is fair. 3515,3516,3517,3518,3519,3520,3521,3522,3523, |
||||
|
|
||||
Simulation November 2017
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
November 2017 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
15/11/2017 |
|||
|
|
|
16/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 845.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (2) / Page Numbers: 3526,3527,3528,3529,3530,3531,3532,3533,3534, 2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 846.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police
_ (8) / Page Numbers: 3535,3536,3537,3538,3539,3540,3541,3542,3543,3544, |
21/11/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 845. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (2) / Page Numbers: 3526,3527,3528,3529,3530,3531,3532,3533,3534, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 21 November 2017 17:12 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Dear Jamie Newman Ø I was just wondering if you were
still on track to have the report ready by the end of Nov 2017 to send
to me. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 27 October 2017
21:26 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Thank you for the
update I hope you are well. Ø I was wondering if
there is any update, Ø I think you have given PC
G enough time in order to address this and work with you in this matter which
it seems so far, he has failed to do so. Ø It has been 3 months
since you sent the recorded letter and you have not heard anything Ø and I believe that in
itself shows he is not willing to address this. Ø I know by past the DPS
would not have given us so long to reply they would have just gone ahead
without us to complete their report. Ø I know a lot of years
was spent on the 1st investigation and overall, Ø this has now been
ongoing since 2013 when this started, it is now 5 years in Nov 2017
this case has been on going I know some of this was due to the DPS not being
able to do anything as court action was ongoing, but this court action should
have never started in the 1st place. Ø In fact, this whole
thing should never have happened if PC G had done his job correctly. Ø Could I please get an
update as to where we are and how long this is going to take as you did state
I should have the report by October 2017 but I can’t see this happening
now due to the time you have waited for PC G, which I do not think is fair. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 October 2017
13:43 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø I apologise for the
delay in providing you with an update. Ø Over the past few days,
Ø I have been discussing
this matter with my supervisor, Ø we hope to conclude our
discussions tomorrow upon which I’ll be able to provide you with a more
meaningful update. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ 3527,3528,3529,3530,3531,3532,3533,3534, 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 846. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police _ (8) / Page Numbers: 3535,3536,3537,3538,3539,3540,3541,3542,3543,3544, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 21 November 2017 17:50 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Hi Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds you well.
Ø The report will almost certainly
be complete by the end of this month, very likely it will be complete by the
end of this week. Ø However, there is a supervision
process to follow which can take a little bit of time. Ø Of course, I will keep you
updated throughout that process, it should take no longer than a week or so. Ø If you’ve any questions in the
interim please do get in touch. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 21 November
2017 17:12 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie
Newman Ø I was just wondering if
you were still on track to have the report ready by the end of Nov 2017
to send to me. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 27 October 2017
21:26 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Thank you for the
update I hope you are well. Ø I was wondering if
there is any update, Ø I think you have given
PC G enough time in order to address this and work with you in this matter which
it seems so far, he has failed to do so. Ø It has been 3 months
since you sent the recorded letter and you have not heard anything Ø and I believe that in
itself shows he is not willing to address this. Ø I know by past the DPS
would not have given us so long to reply they would have just gone ahead
without us to complete their report. Ø I know a lot of years
was spent on the 1st investigation and overall, Ø this has now been
ongoing since 2013 when this started, it is now 5 years in Nov 2017
this case has been on going I know some of this was due to the DPS not being
able to do anything as court action was ongoing, but this court action should
have never started in the 1st place. Ø In fact, this whole
thing should never have happened if PC G had done his job correctly. Ø Could I please get an
update as to where we are and how long this is going to take as you did state
I should have the report by October 2017 but I can’t see this
happening now due to the time you have waited for PC G, which I do not think
is fair. 3536,3537,3538,3539,3540,3541,3542,3543,3544, |
||||
|
|
22/11/2017 |
|||
|
|
|
23/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
26/11/201 |
|||
|
|
|
27/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/11/2017 |
|
|
|
|
||||
Simulation December 2017
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
December 2017 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 848.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police
_ (9) / Page Numbers: 3547,3548,3549,3550,3551, 3552,3553,3554,3555,3556, 2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 849.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (7) / Page Numbers: 3557,3558,3559,3560,3561, 3562,3563,3564, |
01/12/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 848. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police _ (9) / Page Numbers: 3547,3548,3549,3550,3551,3552, 3553,3554,3555,3556, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 01 December 2017 09:20 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
Our meeting today. Good Morning Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds you well.
Ø To confirm the report is complete
and awaits supervision. Ø As soon as it’s signed off, I’ll
send it to you, I’m hopeful this will be by the end of next week, Ø if you’ve any questions in the
interim please do let me know. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 21 November
2017 17:50 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hi
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø The report will almost
certainly be complete by the end of this month, very likely it will be
complete by the end of this week. Ø However, there is a
supervision process to follow which can take a little bit of time. Ø Of course, I will keep
you updated throughout that process, it should take no longer than a week or
so. Ø If you’ve any questions
in the interim please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional
Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding
standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 November
2017 17:12 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie
Newman Ø I was just wondering if
you were still on track to have the report ready by the end of Nov 2017
to send to me. 3548, Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 27 October 2017
21:26 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Thank you for the
update I hope you are well. Ø I was wondering if
there is any update, Ø I think you have given
PC G enough time in order to address this and work with you in this matter
which it seems so far, he has failed to do so. Ø It has been 3 months since
you sent the recorded letter and you have not heard anything Ø and I believe that in
itself shows he is not willing to address this. Ø I know by past the DPS
would not have given us so long to reply they would have just gone ahead
without us to complete their report. Ø I know a lot of years
was spent on the 1st investigation and overall, Ø this has now been
ongoing since 2013 when this started, it is now 5 years in Nov 2017
this case has been on going I know some of this was due to the DPS not being
able to do anything as court action was ongoing, but this court action should
have never started in the 1st place. Ø In fact, this whole
thing should never have happened if PC G had done his job correctly. Ø Could I please get an
update as to where we are and how long this is going to take as you did state
I should have the report by October 2017 but I can’t see this
happening now due to the time you have waited for PC G, which I do not think
is fair. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 October 2017
13:43 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø I apologise for the
delay in providing you with an update. Ø Over the past few days,
Ø I have been discussing
this matter with my supervisor, Ø we hope to conclude our
discussions tomorrow upon which I’ll be able to provide you with a more
meaningful update. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the
bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] 3549, Sent: 24
September 2017 15:52 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello Jamie Ø Maybe you can send to
his work email I believe this is his work email address rory.geoghegan@centreforsocialjustice.org.uk Ø well, that's what it
says when I do a Google search on his name. Ø Maybe you could also
get a phone number for him there not sure; but if you sent to his work
email you would know he got it or if you called and was able to talk to him
you would know if he even wanted to help in this, maybe he has had the
letters but know he does not need to help if he does not want to, maybe send
someone round to the address you have. Ø This is just some ideas
not sure if you can use them. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 22
September 2017 16:35 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Alas I’ve heard nothing
from PC G, now I am entertaining the possibility that he may have moved. Ø As such, I will briefly
examine ways in which to confirm any potential new address before going on to
write the report, in my view you’ve waited long enough. Ø What are your thoughts? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 16 August 2017
12:20 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø Many apologies again
for my delayed reply, it’s been a busy week or so. Ø I’ve had no response
from PC G, the letter was sent recorded delivery. Ø So far, there’s nothing
to say he no longer resides at the address etc. Ø I’ll keep you updated
on that front. Ø As it stands, should PC
G choose to not assist then presently there is little we could do to compel
him to provide an account in the furtherance of the investigation. 3550, Ø I note all of your
comments in your email, Ø I can assure you they
will be taken into account when I come to write my report. Re PC G’s current
occupation, I note your views. Ø All I can say is that
my review of the evidence will be objective and governed by the information
available to me. Ø If you’ve any questions
for me at this stage, as ever, please do put them to me. Kind
regards Jamie Newman
| Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional
Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 07 August 2017
17:31 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie Ø Thank you for the
update reply. Ø Due to never seeing PC
G statement written after what happened on the day, and never having access
to any documents since, Ø I rely on what was said
in court from PC G and also the 1st report after the 1st investigation that
the DPS did, which you are now redoing due to what the IPCC said. Ø PC G stated there was
no notebook in court; he stated Mr Cordell was arrested due to him not
giving his details so they could be confirmed he stated Mr Cordell had said
he was homeless. Ø But Mr Cordell knew
there was a notebook he saw PC G writing in it on the day he was arrested,
and knew he had given his details as if he had not how would PC G have been
able to speak to the insurance companies. Ø In the Crown Court
Appeal in went a lot deeper my son had a barrister and he knew what to ask. Ø When PC G got into
trouble after the audio tapes was played and the judge got really upset due
to knowing that PC G had not told the truth the Judge asked for all documents
the police office had replied on in this case. PC G passed a statement to the
judge he had in his hand that he had been using in court. Ø The judge was not happy
with the statement as there was no date and timed marked, PC G said to the
Judge that the statement he was using was a copy, it was my son barrister
said there seemed to be a time on the back. My son's barrister had also PC G
about the ticket issues and PC G said he did not have it in court, the judge
stated at the start of the hearing he was on the understanding the notebook
had been used. Ø The judge was really
not happy and told PC G to leave the court room but not the court building,
and that he wanted all the original document in court for him to see
regarding this case. Ø The judges heard the
summing up and went out to decide. Ø The CPS went outside in
this time I believe to speak to PC G. Ø As when the Judges came
back in and said my son had won his appeal and that he was not happy with
what had gone on in this case, the CPS stated to the judge this was a
paper-based file case and things get mislaid in this sort of files. Ø The judge asked if the audio
could be kept and placed on file in case it needed to be used later. Ø Which we agreed to, and
we then left the court. It was not until we got the 1st report from the DPS
and the notebook was in there that it was confirmed there was in fact a
notebook all a long so why did PC G lie to us and the judges saying it was
only a 3551, Ø proforma and the
statement he wrote when he got back to the police station. Ø Until we got the DPS report
the only word we had that PC G used his notebook on that day was my son. Ø And I am sorry but it
does not cut it that PC G could get away with saying his arrest was needed
due to uncertainty as to the address provided. Ø When a person is
stopped or spoken to the police like my son was a radio check would be
carried out to check to see if the person was wanted or anything else. Ø The police have my
son's address on their system so the address my son gave would have been
checked and shown as correct on the police system. Ø My son did not need to
lie he give PC G his insurance cert with no problem he had done nothing
wrong, so would have had no need to give a wrong address as he would know it
would have shown on the police system, why would my son say he was homeless?
It was not my son that lied it was PC G and I believe that has already been
proven. Ø I believe 3 weeks is
enough time for PC G to come forward and is acceptable. Ø If the inspector had done
his job when he come to the road side when my son asked if one could have
been called this could have all been avoided, but instead he just went with
what the police officer said and did not brother to check what my son was
saying. Ø Something always come
to mind here and that is what was written in the subject access request I got
back from my son's insurance company, this was after the time we spent trying
to stop the insurance company cancelling my son's insurance and going to
courts. Ø When I saw this, it
hurt as we knew the police had not told the truth and in the subject access
request there was nothing to say my son was not in the wrong. Ø There was no sorry
there was nothing and this is just wrong. Ø My son was the one that
had the bad mark against his name for a long time until it was proven in the
appeal court, not the police officer and this is still the case to this day
the police officer has done nothing wrong in everyone's eyes when he did do
wrong. Ø He has been allowed to
move on in his life, my son was the one spending all the time to clear his
name not the police officer when my son had done nothing wrong. "[ ...]
Which is obviously ... we're in an awkward situation as well because [Data
Subject] and [Data Subject] mum is constantly ringing us up. Ø They don't understand
that obviously we are going to take a police officer's views over obviously
one of our policyholders because obviously a police officer's job is
obviously to tell the truth and not to lie." Ø This is the action of
most people’s view but in this case the police officer was not telling the
truth my son was. And my son was the one being made to suffer when he had not
done anything wrong. Ø But yet people believe
the police in everything they say. Ø I know you have said PC
G's current occupation; I can assure you it would have no bearing on
this matter whatsoever. Ø Maybe I see it another
way his occupation is Head of Criminal Justice, Centre for Social Justice,
can’t you see the irony in this he is trying to find justice for people, but
what he did in this case was never justice at his own hands, the DPS never
served justice for my son, yet they knew PC G had lied in this whole case,
and that PC G took it to the courts and again never told the truth and
perjury himself two times in a court of law. Ø PC G seems to think
this is acceptable he still applied for his job roll where he is working to
make sure justice is fair for all. Ø I am sure if he had
admitted to breaking the law in what he did he would not be in the position
he is in now I do find this very relevant that is how I feel and my son does. Best
Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 07 August 2017
09:44 3552, To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Morning
Lorraine, Ø Firstly, apologies for
my delayed reply! Ø I had intended to reply
much sooner. Ø I think I’m correct in
saying that the necessity for your son’s arrest was associated with PC G’s
uncertainty as to the address provided. Ø This is something I’ll
discuss in the report. Ø Can I ask, from where
did you get the impression that your son’s name was not in PC G’s pocketbook? Ø To reiterate, I’d be
more than happy share documents with you at the end of the investigation. Ø As per the Police
Reform Act, subject to the harm test. Ø Was there any
particular reason you’d want them sooner? Ø I expect the
investigation to conclude in October incidentally. Ø I was intending on
giving PC G three weeks, what are your thoughts on that? Ø Re PC G’s current
occupation, Ø I can assure you it
would have no bearing on this matter whatsoever. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 31 July 2017
17:43 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Thank you for the update
email and I also hope you are well; Ø can I ask a few things
please now that you have had time to go over the documents and information. Ø Regarding PC G notebook
is my son's name at the top and has it been checked if a radio check was done
on my son on that day, Ø I find it hard to
believe that my son's name is not in PC G notebook as and my son refused to
give his name and that is why he was arrested, how would he have had my son's
details to talk to the insurance companies which there is no dispute that he
did and he would have needed my son's details to be able to give them to the
insurance companies, which would mean he unlawfully arrested my son. Ø I know you said you
would have no problem giving us the notebook and his statement and other
information, does this mean we cannot get this information until after the
investigation is completed? Ø What will happen if PC
G does not want to assist in this investigation, how long will you give him
to reply to your letter before you decide he is not willing to assist in the
investigation? Ø I know this time we
will have the right to appeal to the IPCC, if we are not happy, but I do
believe there is enough information and I cannot see why the CPS would not
want to take this further, the only reason I can see them not wanting to take
this on is due to PC G is now Head of Criminal Justice, Centre for Social
Justice. How long do you think it will take you to complete the
investigation? Regards Lorraine Cordell 3553, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 31 July 2017
14:14 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Our meeting
today. Good
Afternoon Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Further to our meeting
last month I have written to PC G to give him the opportunity to participate
in the reinvestigation, Ø I await his reply. Ø When and if he replies
I shall of course let you know. Ø Regarding a CPS
referral, having reviewed the evidence I am currently of the view that such a
referral should be left to the determination of our Appropriate Authority
(A.A. ‐ senior officer who reviews my report) upon the conclusion of
the investigation. Ø As it stands, I see
nothing to prohibit such a referral, should the A.A. think it appropriate. Ø As you know, should the
A.A. elect not to refer the matter to the CPS, Ø you would of course have
a right of appeal to the IPCC along those lines. Ø If you have any
questions for me please do let me know. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 30 June 2017
17:23 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Our meeting
today. Good
Afternoon Lorraine, Ø Thank you for taking the
team to meet with this afternoon, I found our meeting very useful in enabling
me to better understand your complaint. Ø To confirm, the first
thing I shall consider is a referral to the CPS. Ø I shall begin by
examining what consideration was given to such a referral by the previous
investigator, Jeannette Riley. Ø Under the legislation
that governs police complaints it is possible to seek guidance from the CPS
where there is an indication that a criminal offence may have been committed;
it is this test that I shall apply. Ø Leaving the CPS issue
aside for a moment and the possibility of criminal charges, Ø I acknowledge your
request to have sight of the PC Geoghegan’s MG11 and notebook. Ø Such a disclosure can
be made under Schedule 3 of the Police Reform Act 2002. Ø I shall revisit this
request once the possibility of a CPS referral has been addressed. Ø However, I fully intend
to comply with such a request, subject to necessary redactions. Ø Going forward, in addition
your original points of complaint I shall also attempt to provide a clear Ø explanation for the
issues surrounding the misconduct meeting occurring before you had the
opportunity to appeal to the IPCC. Ø As I stated to you
earlier today, the MPS can only apologise for this oversight. 3554, Ø Additionally, as
agreed, if you could send me Dean’s details, or forward mine to him, that
would be very much appreciated, of course, Ø I’ll keep you updated
every step of the away. Ø If you’ve any questions
in the meantime please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment
- please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total Policing
is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch
offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working
with you to make our capital safer. Consider our environment - please do not
print this email unless absolutely necessary. 3555, NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Consider our environment - please do
not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Consider our environment -
please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the 3556, extent
permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by
monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any
binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no
responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or
agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Consider our environment - please do
not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email
and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal
privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it
from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not
distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of
the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted
by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring
staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility
for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The
security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email
messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and
corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet.
Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 849. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (7) / Page Numbers: 3557,3558,3559,3560,3561,3562,3563,3564, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 01 December 2017 11:46 To: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject:
Re: Our meeting today. Dear Jamie Ø Thank you for the reply, Ø now you have completed the report
can you send the document over you said I could have? Lorraine Sent from my iPhone On 1 Dec
2017, at 09:20, <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> wrote: Good
Morning Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø To confirm the report
is complete and awaits supervision. Ø As soon as it’s signed off,
I’ll send it to you, I’m hopeful this will be by the end of next week, Ø if you’ve any questions
in the interim please do let me know. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent: 21 November
2017 17:50 To: 'Lorraine
Cordell' Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hi Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø The report will almost
certainly be complete by the end of this month, very likely it will be
complete by the end of this week. Ø However, there is a
supervision process to follow which can take a little bit of time. Ø Of course, I will keep
you updated throughout that process, it should take no longer than a week or
so. Ø If you’ve any questions
in the interim please do get in touch. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress
State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 21 November
2017 17:12 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie
Newman Ø I was just wondering if
you were still on track to have the report ready by the end of Nov 2017
to send to me. 3558, Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk B Sent: 27 October 2017
21:26 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie
Newman Ø Thank you for the
update I hope you are well. Ø I was wondering if
there is any update, Ø I think you have given
PC G enough time in order to address this and work with you in this matter
which it seems so far, he has failed to do so. Ø It has been 3 months since
you sent the recorded letter and you have not heard anything Ø and I believe that in
itself shows he is not willing to address this. Ø I know by past the DPS
would not have given us so long to reply they would have just gone ahead
without us to complete their report. Ø I know a lot of years
was spent on the 1st investigation and overall, Ø this has now been
ongoing since 2013 when this started, it is now 5 years in Nov 2017
this case has been on going I know some of this was due to the DPS not being
able to do anything as court action was ongoing, but this court action should
have never started in the 1st place. Ø In fact, this whole
thing should never have happened if PC G had done his job correctly. Ø Could I please get an
update as to where we are and how long this is going to take as you did state
I should have the report by October 2017 but I can’t see this
happening now due to the time you have waited for PC G, which I do not think
is fair. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 October 2017
13:43 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø I apologise for the
delay in providing you with an update. Ø Over the past few days,
Ø I have been discussing
this matter with my supervisor, Ø we hope to conclude our
discussions tomorrow upon which I’ll be able to provide you with a more
meaningful update. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the
bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 24
September 2017 15:52 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hello Jamie Ø Maybe you can send to
his work email I believe this is his work email address rory.geoghegan@centreforsocialjustice.org.uk Ø well, that's what it
says when I do a Google search on his name. Ø Maybe you could also
get a phone number for him there not sure; but if you sent to his work email
you would know he got it or if you called and was able to talk to him you
would know if he even wanted to help in this, maybe he has had the letters
but know he does not need to help if he does not want to, maybe send someone
round to the address you have. Ø This is just some ideas
not sure if you can use them. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] 3559,3560,3561,3562,3563,3564, |
||||
|
|
|
02/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 850.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police
_ (10) / Page Numbers: 3565,3566,3567,3568,3569, 3570,3571,3572,3573,3574,3575,3576, 2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 851.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (6) / Page Numbers: 3577,3578,3579,3580,3581, 3582,3583,3584,3585,3586, |
04/12/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 850. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police _ (10) / Page Numbers: 3565,3566,3567,3568,3569,3570,3571,3572,3573,3574,3575,3576, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 04 December 2017 12:13 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Hello Lorraine, Ø Absolutely, to confirm it was the
pocket note book wasn’t it? Ø Was there anything else? Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 01 December
2017 11:46 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: Re: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie Ø Thank you for the
reply, Ø now you have completed
the report can you send the document over you said I could have? Lorraine Sent from
my iPhone on 1 Dec 2017, at 09:20, Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk wrote: Good
Morning Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø To confirm the report
is complete and awaits supervision. Ø As soon as it’s signed
off, I’ll send it to you, I’m hopeful this will be by the end of next week, Ø if you’ve any questions
in the interim please do let me know. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the
bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Sent:
21 November 2017 17:50 3566,3567,3568,3569,3570,3571,3572,3573,3574,3575,3576, 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 851. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (6) / Page Numbers: 3577,3578,3579,3580,3581,3582,3583,3584,3585,3586, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 04 December 2017 21:58 To: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject:
Re: Our meeting today. Hi Jamie Ø You said you would give me the
pocket notebook and statements and anything else you could. Regards Lorraine Sent from
my iPhone on 4 Dec 2017, at 12:12, <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> wrote: Hello
Lorraine, Ø Absolutely, to confirm
it was the pocket note book wasn’t it? Ø Was there anything
else? Kind
regards Jamie Newman
| Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 01 December
2017 11:46 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: Re: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie Ø Thank you for the
reply, Ø now you have completed
the report can you send the document over you said I could have? Lorraine Sent from
my iPhone on 1 Dec 2017, at 09:20, <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> wrote: Good
Morning Lorraine, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø To confirm the report
is complete and awaits supervision. Ø As soon as it’s signed off,
I’ll send it to you, I’m hopeful this will be by the end of next week, Ø if you’ve any questions
in the interim please do let me know. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional
Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk 3578,3579,3580,3581,3582,3583,3584,3585,3586, |
||||
|
|
|
05/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
06/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
4 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 857.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (5) / Page Numbers: 3599,3600,3601,3602,3603,3604, 3605,3606,3607,3608,3609, |
14/12/2017 |
|
|
|
4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 857. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (5) / Page Numbers: 3599,3600,3601,3602,3603,3604,3605,3606,3607,3608,3609, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 14 December 2017 13:15 To: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject:
Re: Our meeting today. Hi Jamie Newman Ø Was just wondering if there was
any update as to when we would get the report and documents. Regards Lorraine Sent from
my iPhone on 4 Dec 2017, at 21:58, Lorraine Cordell lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk wrote: Hi Jamie Ø You said you would give
me the pocket notebook and statements and anything else you could. Regards Lorraine Sent from
my iPhone on 4 Dec 2017, at 12:12, Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk wrote: Hello
Lorraine, Ø Absolutely, to confirm
it was the pocket note book wasn’t it? Ø Was there anything
else? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional
Standards | Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 01 December
2017 11:46 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: Re: Our meeting
today. Dear Jamie Ø Thank you for the
reply, Ø now you have completed
the report can you send the document over you said I could have? Lorraine 3600,3601,3602,3603,3604,3605,3606,3607,3608,3609, |
||||
|
|
|
15/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 860.
Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ Our meeting today / Page Numbers: 3612,3613,3614,3615,3616, 3617,3618,3619,3620,3621,3622,3623,3624, 2 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 861.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (3) / Page Numbers: 3625,3626,3627,3628,3629,3630,3631,3632, 3633,3634,3635,3636,3637,3638,3639,3640, 3 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 862.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police _
(11) / Page Numbers: 3641,3642,3643,3644,3645,3646,3647,3648, 3649,3650,3651,3652,3653,3654,3655,3656,3657, 4 ·
The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 863.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (4) / Page Numbers: 3658,3659,3660,3661,3662,3663,3664,3665, 3666,3667,3668,3669,3670,3671,3672,3673,3674,3675, |
18/12/2017 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 860. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ Our
meeting today / Page Numbers: 3612,3613,3614,3615,3616,3617,3618,3619,3620,3621,3622,3623,3624, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 18 December 2017 14:06 To: Lorraine Cordell Subject:
Fwd.: Our meeting today. Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Lorraine
Cordell Date: 14 December
2017 at 13:15:23 GMT To: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: Re: Our meeting
today. Hi Jamie
Newman Ø Was just wondering if there
was any update as to when we would get the report and documents. Regards Lorraine Sent from
my iPhone on 4 Dec 2017, at 21:58, Lorraine Cordell wrote: Hi Jamie Ø You said you would give
me the pocket notebook and statements and anything else you could. Regards Lorraine Sent from
my iPhone on 4 Dec 2017, at 12:12, <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> wrote: Hello
Lorraine, Ø Absolutely, to confirm
it was the pocket note book wasn’t it? Ø Was there anything
else? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate
of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email 3613,3614,3615,3616,3617,3618,3619,3620,3621,3622,3623,3624, 2 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 861. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (3) / Page Numbers: 3625,3626,3627,3628,3629,3630,3631,3632,3633,3634,3635,3636,3637,3638,3639,3640, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 18 December 2017 14:12 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Hi Jamie Newman Ø Hope you are doing well; Ø I have not had a reply to some of
the below emails and was wondering if there was any update on the report and
information you said I could get as to when I will get everything, Ø I know you said on the 01/12/2017
I should have had the report within a week but as of yet we still do not have
anything, if I could get an update, I would be grateful. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine
Cordell Date: 14 December
2017 at 13:15:23 GMT To: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: Re: Our meeting
today. Hi Jamie
Newman Ø Was just wondering if
there was any update as to when we would get the report and documents. Regards Lorraine Sent from
my iPhone on 4 Dec 2017, at 21:58, Lorraine Cordell > wrote: Hi Jamie Ø You said you would give
me the pocket notebook and statements and anything else you could. Regards Lorraine Sent from
my iPhone on 4 Dec 2017, at 12:12, <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> wrote: Hello Lorraine, Ø Absolutely, to confirm
it was the pocket note book wasn’t it? Ø Was there anything
else? Kind regards 3626,3627,3628,3629,3630,3631,3632,3633,3634,3635,3636,3637,3638,3639,3640, 3 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 862. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police _ (11) / Page Numbers: 3641,3642,3643,3644,3645,3646,3647,3648,3649,3650,3651,3652,3653,3654,3655,3656,3657, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 18 December 2017 14:58 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Attachments:
Redacted PNB.pdf Hello Lorraine, Ø I apologise for my delayed reply. Ø The report is still awaiting what
we call a Reg 19 determination, once that’s made, Ø I’ll send the report to you. Ø I apologise for the delay. Ø Re the additional material, a
redacted copy of the relevant pages of PC G’s pocket book are attached. Ø If you could have a look at the
original report, in particular what documents it refers to, and let me know
what you’re not in possession of I’d be grateful. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or
favour’ From: Lorraine
Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 18 December
2017 14:12 To: Newman
Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting
today. Hi Jamie
Newman Ø Hope you are doing
well; Ø I have not had a reply
to some of the below emails and was wondering if there was any update on the
report and information you said I could get as to when I will get everything,
Ø I know you said on the
01/12/2017 I should have had the report within a week but as of yet we
still do not have anything, if I could get an update, I would be grateful. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine
Cordell Date: 14 December
2017 at 13:15:23 GMT To: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: Re: Our meeting
today. Hi Jamie
Newman Ø Was just wondering if
there was any update as to when we would get the report and documents. Regards 3642,3643,3644,3645,3646,3647,3648,3649,3650,3651,3652,3653,3654,3655,3656,3657, 4 The Enfield Gov /
Email’s Issue: 863. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (4) / Page Numbers: 3658,3659,3660,3661,3662,3663,3664,3665,3666,3667,3668,3669,3670,3671,3672,3673,3674,3675, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 18 December 2017 17:24 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Hi Jamie Ø Thank you for the document but
can I please ask something has PC G notebook been edited in anyway as from
the images they really look to have been edited, Ø I have shown a few people what
you sent me and each have said the same thing. Ø Also, I knew PC G said my son was
arrested because he would not give his address, which is clearly wrong
because my son did give his address and it is clearly in the notebook. Ø I just told you the wrong court
as I was thinking he said this in the appeal case at the crown court when my
son won his case, but it was not it was in the lower court when PC G said
this as I just checked both the appeal case notes and the lower courts clerk
notes, and it is clearly in the lower court clerks notes when PC G said this,
so when the appeal came, he changed what he said to the reason why my son was
arrested. Ø
(See below clerk notes lower court) Ø I established his name – had
difficulties with his address Ø In the end arrested him as he
would not provide his address. Ø At Peckham custody he provided
details I issued penalty notice. Ø I believe if you check the clerk
court notes you will see this clearly. Ø So why was my son arrested
unlawfully? Ø Why did he even tell the appeal
judge he did not have a notebook? Ø Seeing as we never had any of PC
G's statements could I get them, the one that he made when he got back to the
police station, the one that should have come when we were told about a court
date. Ø and if I am allowed the statement
he wrote in regards to the complaint, I sure he must have made a statement
when the 1st investigation was ongoing when he was still a police officer
before he left, and any other information that can be given, maybe the police
officer statement that was with PC G on that day and maybe his notebook, also
the inspectors who was called to the road side and never done anything, maybe
his statement and notebook, as there was more than one officer that day and
they should have an account what happened. Ø I also cannot understand why when
my son was arrested why no one can found the custody record as I would like
that. And any other reports or information I am allowed. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 18 December 2017 14:58 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject:
RE: Our meeting today. Hello Lorraine, Ø
I apologies for
my delayed reply. 3659,3660,3661,3662,3663,3664,3665,3666,3667,3668,3669,3670,3671,3672,3673,3674,3675, |
||||
|
|
|
19/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
28/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/12/2017 |
|
|
|
|
||||
Simulation January 2018
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
January
2018 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 864.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (12) / Page Numbers: 3676,3677,3678,3679,3680,3681,3682,3683, 3684,3685,3686,3687,3688,3689,3690,3691,3692,3693, |
04/01/2018 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 864. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (12) / Page Numbers: 3676,3677,3678,3679,3680,3681,3682,3683, 3684,3685,3686,3687,3688,3689,3690,3691,3692,3693, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 04 January 2018 17:46 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi Jamie Ø I hope this email finds you well
and you had a good Christmas and New Year, Ø I was wondering if there is any
update on the report and the below email, Ø I cannot understand what is
taking too long with the report and document. Ø If you can let me have an update,
I would be grateful Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 December 2017 17:24 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi
Jamie Ø Thank you for the
document but can I please ask something has PC G notebook been edited in
anyway as from the images they really look to have been edited, Ø I have shown a few
people what you sent me and each have said the same thing. Ø Also, I knew PC G said
my son was arrested because he would not give his address, which is clearly
wrong because my son did give his address and it is clearly in the notebook. Ø I just told you the
wrong court as I was thinking he said this in the appeal case at the crown
court when my son won his case, but it was not it was in the lower court when
PC G said this as I just checked both the appeal case notes and the lower
courts clerk notes, and it is clearly in the lower court clerks notes when PC
G said this, so when the appeal came, he changed what he said to the reason
why my son was arrested. Ø (See below clerk notes
lower court) Ø I established his name
– had difficulties with his address Ø In the end arrested him
as he would not provide his address. Ø At Peckham custody he
provided details I issued penalty notice. Ø I believe if you check
the clerk court notes you will see this clearly. Ø So why was my son
arrested unlawfully? Ø Why did he even tell
the appeal judge he did not have a notebook? Ø Seeing as we never had
any of PC G's statements could I get them, the one that he made when he got
back to the police station, the one that should have come when we were told
about a court date. Ø and if I am allowed the
statement he wrote in regards to the complaint, I sure he must have made a
statement when the 1st investigation was ongoing when he was still a police
officer before he left, and any other information that can be given, maybe
the police officer statement that was with PC G on that day and maybe his
notebook, also the inspectors who was called to the road side and never done
anything, maybe his statement and notebook, as there was more than one
officer that day and they should have an account what happened. 3677, Ø I also cannot
understand why when my son was arrested why no one can found the custody
record as I would like that. And any other reports or information I am
allowed. Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 18 December 2017
14:58 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hello
Lorraine, Ø I apologise for my
delayed reply. Ø The report is still
awaiting what we call a Reg 19 determination, once that’s made, Ø I’ll send the report to
you. Ø I apologise for the
delay. Ø Re the additional material,
a redacted copy of the relevant pages of PC G’s pocket book are attached. Ø If you could have a
look at the original report, in particular what documents it refers to, and
let me know what you’re not in possession of I’d be grateful. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met
Phone 786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email
Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine Cordell mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 December 2017
14:12 To: Newman Jamie M ‐
HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi
Jamie Newman Ø Hope you are doing
well; Ø I have not had a reply
to some of the below emails and was wondering if there was any update on the
report and information you said I could get as to when I will get everything,
Ø I know you said on the
01/12/2017 I should have had the report within a week but as of yet we
still do not have anything, if I could get an update, I would be grateful. Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell Date: 14 December 2017 at 13:15:23 GMT To: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: Re: Our meeting today. 3678,3679,3680,3681,3682,3683,3684, 3685,3686,3687,3688,3689,3690,3691,3692,3693, |
||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 865.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police
_ (12) / Page Numbers: 3694,3695,3696,3697,3698, 3699,3700,3701,3702,3703, 3704,3705,3706,3707,3708, 3709,3710,3711,3712, 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 866.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (11) / Page Numbers: 3713,3714,3715,3716,3717, 3718,3719,3720,3721,3722, 3723,3724,3725,3726,3727, 3728,3729,3730,3731,3732, 3 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 867.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police
_ (13) / Page Numbers: 3733,3734,3735,3736,3737, 3738,3739,3740,3741,3742, 3743,3744,3745,3746,3747, 3748,3749,3750,3751, |
05/01/2018 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 865. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police _ (12) / Page Numbers: 3694,3695,3696,3697,3698,3699, 3700,3701,3702,3703,3704,3705, 3706,3707,3708,3709,3710,3711, 3712, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 05 January 2018 12:30 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi Lorraine, Ø A Happy New Year to you. Ø Have you a telephone number I can
call you on? Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct
Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor,
Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards
without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 04 January 2018 17:46 To: Newman Jamie M ‐
HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi
Jamie Ø I hope this email finds
you well and you had a good Christmas and New Year, Ø I was wondering if
there is any update on the report and the below email, Ø I cannot understand
what is taking so long with the report and document. Ø If you can let me have
an update, I would be grateful Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 December 2017
17:24 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi
Jamie Ø Thank you for the
document but can I please ask something has PC G notebook been edited in
anyway as from the images they really look to have been edited, Ø I have shown a few
people what you sent me and each have said the same thing. Ø Also, I knew PC G said
my son was arrested because he would not give his address, which is clearly
wrong because my son did give his address and it is clearly in the notebook. Ø I just told you the
wrong court as I was thinking he said this in the appeal case at the crown
court when my son won his case, but it was not it was in the lower court when
PC G said this as I just checked both the appeal case notes and the lower
courts clerk notes, and it is clearly in the lower court clerks notes when PC
G said this, so when the appeal came, he changed what he said to the reason
why my son was arrested. Ø (See below clerk notes
lower court) Ø I established his name
– had difficulties with his address Ø In the end arrested him
as he would not provide his address. Ø At Peckham custody he
provided details I issued penalty notice. Ø I believe if you check
the clerk court notes you will see this clearly. Ø So why was my son
arrested unlawfully? Ø Why did he even tell
the appeal judge he did not have a notebook? Ø Seeing as we never had
any of PC G's statements could I get them, the one that he made when he got
back to the police station, the one that should have come when we were told
about a court date. Ø and if I am allowed the
statement he wrote in regards to the complaint, I sure he must have made a
statement when the 1st investigation was ongoing when he was still a police
officer before he left, and any other information that can be given, maybe
the police officer statement that was with PC G on that day and maybe his
notebook, also the inspectors who was called to the road side and never done
anything, maybe his statement and notebook, as there was more than one
officer that day and they should have an account what happened. Ø I also cannot
understand why when my son was arrested why no one can found the custody
record as I would like that. And any other reports or information I am
allowed. 3695,3696,3697,3698,3699,3700,3701,3702,3703,3704,3705,3706,3707,3708,3709,3710,3711,3712, 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 866. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today_ (11) / Page Numbers: 3713,3714,3715,3716,3717,3718, 3719,3720,3721,3722,3723,3724, 3725,3726,3727,3728,3729,3730, 3731,3732, From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 05 January 2018 14:31 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi Jamie Ø You can contract me on 07807
333545 Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 05 January 2018 12:30 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi
Lorraine, Ø A Happy New Year to
you. Ø Have you a telephone
number I can call you on? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met
Phone 786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email
Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 04 January 2018 17:46 To: Newman Jamie M ‐
HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi
Jamie Ø I hope this email finds
you well and you had a good Christmas and New Year, Ø I was wondering if
there is any update on the report and the below email, Ø I cannot understand
what is taking too long with the report and document. Ø If you can let me have
an update, I would be grateful Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 December 2017 17:24 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi Jamie 3714,3715,3716,3717,3718,3719,3720,3721,3722,3723,3724,3725,3726,3727,3728,3729,3730,3731,3732, 3 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 867. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police _ (13) / Page Numbers: 3733,3734,3735,3736,3737,3738,3739,3740,3741,3742,3743,3744,3745,3746,3747,3748,3749,3750,3751, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 05 January 2018 17:48 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi Lorraine, Ø I did try to call you just now to
no avail. Ø I shall call you on Monday
morning, Ø I hope this is convenient? Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct
Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor,
Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards
without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 05 January 2018 14:31 To: Newman Jamie M ‐
HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi
Jamie Ø You can contract me on
07807 333545 Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 05 January 2018 12:30 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi
Lorraine, Ø A Happy New Year to
you. Ø Have you a telephone
number I can call you on? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met
Phone 786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email
Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine Cordell mailto:
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 04 January 2018 17:46 To: Newman Jamie M ‐
HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi Jamie 3734, Ø I hope this email finds
you well and you had a good Christmas and New Year, Ø I was wondering if
there is any update on the report and the below email, Ø I cannot understand
what is taking too long with the report and document. Ø If you can let me have
an update, I would be grateful Regards Lorraine From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 18 December 2017
17:24 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: Our meeting today. Hi
Jamie Ø Thank you for the
document but can I please ask something has PC G notebook been edited in
anyway as from the images they really look to have been edited, Ø I have shown a few
people what you sent me and each have said the same thing. Ø Also, I knew PC G said
my son was arrested because he would not give his address, which is clearly
wrong because my son did give his address and it is clearly in the notebook. Ø I just told you the
wrong court as I was thinking he said this in the appeal case at the crown
court when my son won his case, but it was not it was in the lower court when
PC G said this as I just checked both the appeal case notes and the lower
courts clerk notes, and it is clearly in the lower court clerks notes when PC
G said this, so when the appeal came, he changed what he said to the reason
why my son was arrested. Ø (See below clerk notes
lower court) Ø I established his name
– had difficulties with his address Ø In the end arrested him
as he would not provide his address. Ø At Peckham custody he
provided details I issued penalty notice. Ø I believe if you check
the clerk court notes you will see this clearly. Ø So why was my son
arrested unlawfully? Ø Why did he even tell
the appeal judge he did not have a notebook? Ø Seeing as we never had
any of PC G's statements could I get them, the one that he made when he got
back to the police station, the one that should have come when we were told
about a court date. Ø and if I am allowed the
statement he wrote in regards to the complaint, I sure he must have made a
statement when the 1st investigation was ongoing when he was still a police
officer before he left, and any other information that can be given, maybe
the police officer statement that was with PC G on that day and maybe his
notebook, also the inspectors who was called to the road side and never done
anything, maybe his statement and notebook, as there was more than one
officer that day and they should have an account what happened. Ø I also cannot
understand why when my son was arrested why no one can found the custody
record as I would like that. And any other reports or information I am
allowed. 3735,3736,3737,3738,3739,3740,3741,3742,3743,3744,3745,3746,3747,3748,3749,3750,3751, |
||||
|
|
|
06/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 868.
Jamie.Newman @met.pnn _
(13) / Page Numbers: 3752, 2 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 869.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Investigation Report – Attached / Page Numbers: 3753,3754, |
24/01/2018 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 868. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn _ (13) / Page Numbers: 3752, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 24 January 2018 14:54 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Investigation Report Attached Attachments: DEC 17 Outcome Letter Mr Cordell.pdf PC G's Statement.pdf Hello Lorraine, Ø Attached is the outcome report we
discussed the other day and a copy of PC G’s statement, disclosed to you
under the Police Reform Act 2002, with redactions to protect the personal
data of others. Ø For the avoidance of doubt, our
Chief Inspector decided not to refer the matter to the CPS. Ø I’m sorry for the amount of time
it has taken to bring this matter to its conclusion, Ø please do pass on my apologies to
your son. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct
Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor,
Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards
without fear or favour’ Consider our environment - please do not
print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any attachments may be
confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended
solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid
incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information
in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems
are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email.
The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with
other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments
cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during
transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this
communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find us at: Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk 2 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 869. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Investigation Report – Attached / Page Numbers: 3753,3754, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 24 January 2018 17:05 To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk' Subject: RE: Investigation Report
Attached Dear Jamie Ø Thank you for the report and
documents Ø but I am having a little issue it
is saying both attachments are damaged and I can’t open them could you please
resend them to me Regards Lorraine From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 24 January 2018 14:54 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: Investigation Report
Attached Hello
Lorraine, Ø Attached is the outcome
report we discussed the other day and a copy of PC G’s statement, disclosed
to you under the Police Reform Act 2002, with redactions to protect the
personal data of others. Ø For the avoidance of
doubt, our Chief Inspector decided not to refer the matter to the CPS. Ø I’m sorry for the amount
of time it has taken to bring this matter to its conclusion, Ø please do pass on my
apologies to your son. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met
Phone 786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email
Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ Consider
our environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised
agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security of this email
and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely
scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content can still
occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed
in this communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find
us at: Facebook:
Facebook.com/metpolice.uk 3754, Twitter:
@metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 870.
Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Investigation Report - Attached _ (1) / Page Numbers: 3755,3756, |
25/01/2018 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 870. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Investigation Report - Attached _ (1) / Page Numbers: 3755,3756, From: Lorraine Cordell Sent: 25 January 2018 11:07 To: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: Re: Investigation Report
Attached Hi Jamie Ø Nope you are well Ø Not sure if you got my email
yesterday with regards to the attached documents. Ø Could you please resend them not
sure what went wrong but both the documents the report and PC G statement was
damaged or corrupt and I could not open them. Regards Lorraine Sent
from my iPhone on 24 Jan 2018, at 14:53, <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> wrote: Hello
Lorraine, Ø Attached is the outcome
report we discussed the other day and a copy of PC G’s statement, disclosed
to you under the Police Reform Act 2002, with redactions to protect the
personal data of others. Ø For the avoidance of
doubt, our Chief Inspector decided not to refer the matter to the CPS. Ø I’m sorry for the
amount of time it has taken to bring this matter to its conclusion, Ø please do pass on my
apologies to your son. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards
| Met
Phone 786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email
Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ Consider
our environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find
us at: Facebook:
Facebook.com/metpolice.uk 3756, Twitter: @metpolice.uk <DEC 17 Outcome Letter Mr Cordell.pdf> <PC G's Statement.pdf> |
||||
|
|
1 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 871.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn
_ (14) / Page Numbers: 3757,3758, 2 ·
My
Birthday! |
26/01/2018 |
|
|
|
1 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 871. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn _ (14) / Page Numbers: 375,3758, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 26 January 2018 13:59 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: Investigation Report
Attached Attachments: DEC 17 Outcome Letter Mr
Cordell.pdf PC G's Statement.pdf Hi Lorraine, Ø Apologies for the inconvenience
this has caused you. Ø Here’s my second attempt at
sending the documents! Ø Please confirm whether you can
open them. Ø If you need the original report
please do let me know. Kind regards Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct
Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards | Met Phone 786675 Telephone 0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor,
Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting the bar and upholding standards
without fear or favour’ From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Sent: 25 January 2018 11:07 To: Newman Jamie M ‐
HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: Re: Investigation Report ‐ Attached Hi
Jamie Ø Nope you are well Ø Not sure if you got my
email yesterday with regards to the attached documents. Ø Could you please resend
them not sure what went wrong but both the documents the report and PC G
statement was damaged or corrupt and I could not open them. Regards Lorraine Sent
from my iPhone on 24 Jan 2018, at 14:53, Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk wrote: Hello
Lorraine, Ø Attached is the outcome
report we discussed the other day and a copy of PC G’s statement, disclosed
to you under the Police Reform Act 2002, with redactions to protect the
personal data of others. Ø For the avoidance of
doubt, our Chief Inspector decided not to refer the matter to the CPS. Ø I’m sorry for the
amount of time it has taken to bring this matter to its conclusion, please do 3758, Ø pass on my apologies to
your son. Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards
| Met
Phone 786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email
Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR 'Setting
the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’ Consider
our environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find
us at: Facebook:
Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk <DEC 17 Outcome Letter Mr Cordell.pdf> <PC G's Statement.pdf> Consider
our environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find
us at: Facebook:
Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
27/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/01/2018 |
|
|
|
|
5 ·
The Enfield Gov / Email’s
Issue: 872.
Jamie.Newman@met.pnn
_ (1) / Page Numbers: 3759,3760,3761, |
30/01/2018 |
|
|
|
5 The
Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 872. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn _ (1) / Page Numbers: 3759,3760,3761, From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 30 January 2017
12:56 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Hello Ms
Cordell, Ø I hope this email finds
you well. Ø Have you had a chance
to look at the document attached to my last email? Kind
regards Jamie
Newman Serious
Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards
| Met Phone
786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR From: Lorraine Cordell
[mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 23 January 2017
13:58 To: Newman Jamie M ‐
HQ Directorate of Professional Standards Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear
Jamie Newman Ø Yes, I am dealing with
on behalf of my son have been from the start. Ø So, if everything can
be done via this email, I would be grateful. Ø I will look at the
attached document today, but do believe you have had contact with Martin
Jerkins and he confirms that the Police officer did not say about any tools
or Mr Cordell going around doing odd jobs on that call. Ø As the police officer
did when he made the call to KGM. Regards Lorraine
Cordell From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk Sent: 23 January 2017
10:24 To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Good
Morning, Ø You are correct, I am
to re‐investigate the matter. Ø I look forward to
working with you to bring this matter to a satisfactory conclusion. Ø Early in December I
wrote to Mr Cordell though received no reply. Ø I wrote to him again in
early January though again received no reply. Ø If you’re dealing with
this matter on his behalf then that explains it. Ø Am I to assume I’m to
communicate with you going forward? Ø I’ve attached the
letter I sent to Mr Cordell. I’d appreciate it if you could respond to my
request at your earliest convenience. Ø Any questions please do
ask. 3760, Kind
regards Jamie
Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of
Professional Standards | Met
Phone 786675 Telephone
0207 161 6675 Email
Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk Address
Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR From: Lorraine Cordell
[mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: 22 January 2017
12:56 To: Newman Jamie M ‐
HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk> Subject: RE: PC/6804/13 Dear
Jamie Newman Ø I believe you are the
person taking over the reinvestigation of the case PC/6804/13. Ø Could you please tell
me how far you got with the reinvestigation? Ø Also, could all contact
be made via this email as I am the one dealing with this for my son Mr. Simon
Cordell. Regards Lorraine
Cordell Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. Consider
our environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from
your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or
copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find
us at: Facebook:
Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk Total
Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities
to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for
London, working with you to make our capital safer. 3761, Consider
our environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. NOTICE This email and any
attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege
and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received
this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the
information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS
communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law.
Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for
unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security
of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are
routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content
can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions
expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Find
us at: Facebook:
Facebook.com/metpolice.uk Twitter: @metpolice.uk |
||||
|
|
|
31/01/2018 |
|
|
|
last email |
||||
Simulation February 2018
(Click here to go back to the
Index)
|
last email February
2018 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
27/02/2018 |
|||
|
|
|
27/02/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/02/2018 |
|
|
|
March
2018 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
27/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/03/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/03/2018 |
|
|
|
April
2018 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
27/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/04/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/04/2018 |
|
|
|
May 2018 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
06/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
27/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/05/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/05/2018 |
|
|
|
June
2018 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
06/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
27/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/06/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/06/2018 |
|
|
|
July
2018 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
06/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/07/2018 |
|
|
|
24/07/2018 |
|
|||
|
|
|
24/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/07/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/07/2018 |
|
|
|
August 2018 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
06/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
28/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/08/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/08/2018 |
|
|
|
September 2018 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
06/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
28/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/09/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/09/2018 |
|
|
|
October 2018 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
06/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
28/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/10/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/10/2018 |
|
|
|
November 2018 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
06/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
07/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
15/11/2018 |
|||
|
|
|
16/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
22/11/2018 |
|||
|
|
|
23/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
26/11/2018 |
|||
|
|
|
27/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
28/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
29/11/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/11/2018 |
|
|
|
December 2018 |
||||
|
Dates |
Incidents |
|||
|
|
|
01/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
02/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
03/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
04/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
05/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
06/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
08/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
09/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
13/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
14/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
15/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
16/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
17/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
18/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
19/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
20/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
21/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
22/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
23/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
24/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
25/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
26/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
27/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
28/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
30/12/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
31/12/2018 |
|
|